Display Stock level for every user

Hi
I need to display the stock level for each user (partdetail.aspx). So they know how many they can order.
I know it is only displaying for the superusers. Is there anyway of display the stock level for other users as well rather than just showing the message "in stock"
Thanks
Sanjaya

Hey Sanjaya, that would probably require writing your own control ... but even if you do it, remember that stock levels in WebTools are not immediately reduced when an order is placed. For example if you have 10 in stock and someone places an order for 5, another customer will still see 10 in stock. It isn't until the next synch when the order is placed in SBO and its inventory is affected that the new inventory numbers are reflected in WebTools.
I guess you could write a smarter control that looked up the last inventory and subtracted any orders that haven't synched yet to get a better "real-time" inventory count. However this still doesn't help if an order is placed directly in SBO and WebTools doesn't know about it.
At least this is the way it worked the last time I looked into it.
Steve

Similar Messages

How to control the data to display for every users?

Hello Experts,
Im creating a module in ORACLE forms6i and I want to control all the data to display for every USERs. I have 1 Table and it has 5 columns.
My module has 5 columns and 5 rows of records to display.
Problems:
For USER1, I want to display all DATA in column3 and column4 only and all remaining columns shoud be null.
For USER2 , I want to dislplay all data in Column1 only and all remaining columns should be null.
How can i control all the data to display for each columns? Can you help me please. Im using the Clear_Items but its not working only the first row are null but the remaining
rows has its records.
Thanks.
Lala

I understand that you want certain columns not to show at all on the canvas when a certain user opens the form. Then, in the when-new-form-instance trigger, you should set_item_property(x_item, visible, property_false) for each item you do not want to be dislayed, depending on the user.

How to Default what fields and assignment blocks appear for every user?

Is there a standard way to default what users see in the webui? We'd like to display certain assignment blocks, fields, etc without having the user go thru the personalization process. There are certain pieces we need to display across the board for every user and would like to set this up in advance of them logging into the WebUI.
Thanks in advance

Hi James,
With the business roles you can define what the user is allowed to see or do and not.
So you create your special user business role e.g. Z_USER_SALESPRO and then you can create a business role specific configuration of the views (add/ remove fields) or overview pages (add/remove assignment blocks).
If you want to you can also deny user with this business role the possibility to personalize their pages at all.
If you want to show information to all user in the same way then just maintain the default configuration in the enhanced component. As the WebUI always looks for the most specific key found within the configurations available.
Please make sure you work in default configuration of the enhanced component, else you change SAP standard cheat sheet.
Hope this helps.
Best regards,
Thea

How to create an default profile for every user on one machine? Deployment of configurations?

On firefox 3.5.X i can copy an configured profile from an user-folder to the programm folder of firefox. \mozilla firefox\defaults\profiles.
After an new user log in to the machine the default profile will get the actual profile of the new user. With all bookmarks, configurations and so on.
But this doesn't work with the firefox 3.6.10? What changed? What will be the way i can get an default configuration for every user on one machine? I want to deploy the firefox with an default configuration in our enterprise? Why does the behaviour change?
What to do?
Thanks...

No - there are no missing data, because nothing will be copied. The profile - folder does not work.
There are the standard first start behavior.
There might be another trick? Hint? Todo?
Thanks.

Authority Check at the T.Code level for the user in particular User Group

Hi Friends,
I have created a ZREPORT and assigned this report to a ZTRANSACTION CODE.
Need to give Authority Check at the T.Code level for the user in particular User Group.
I have searched in SCN, but not get suitable pages.
How to solve this?
Regards,
Viji.

Hi Viji.
Saha way is actual way for authority tcode but user authority in TCODE:- SE38 he/she can run report(ZREPORT) wise program is run is no authority check.
Another way is you have also check authority in program level.
DATA: T_ROLE_USERS TYPE STR_AGRS OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE.
   INITIALIZATION.
CALL FUNCTION 'ESS_USERS_OF_ROLE_GET'
    EXPORTING
      ROLE       = 'ZROLE'' " Role define
    TABLES
      ROLE_USERS = T_ROLE_USERS.
READ TABLE T_ROLE_USERS WITH KEY UNAME = SY-UNAME.
   IF SY-SUBRC NE 0.
   RETURN.
   ENDIF.
Thanks & Regards
Rahul

WHY PGA IS REQUIRED FOR EVERY USER ?

Good Morning Everyone ;
I have a question about PGA.
WHY PGA IS REQUIRED FOR EVERY USER ?
What i got from google ..
Even though the parse information for SQL or PL/SQL may already be available in library cache of shared pool,
the value upon which the user want to execute the select or update statement cannot be shared.
I cant realize it Can anyone show clear example , if possible ?
DB Version is 10.2.0.4.0
OS : oracle linux 5.5
Thanks in advance ..

Thanks aman and heok.
My Question :
Your explanation is clear. I think i am getting little bit confused.
Could you please clarify little more ?
>> session 1 :
user is HR
SQL>select * from tab1 ORDER BY name;
>> session 2 :
user is scott
SQL>select * from tab1 where ORDER BY name;
>> session 3 :
user is USER1
SQL>select * from TAB1 where ORDER BY name;
>> session 4 :
user is USER2
SQL>select * from TAB1 where ORDER BY name;
IS this right aman ?
Already sql statements are avail in SGA ,Even though all above users needs same information.
Oracle does sorting operation in PGA. If PGA exceeds , oracle will use temporary tablespace .
Thanks heok and aman.

Display a label for every other category on a graph

I have a line graph created in Illustrator with years on the horizontal axis (1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, etc.). There is data for each year that will be plotted on the line, however I would only like to display every other year (1998, 2000, 2002, 2004, 2006, etc.). Is there a way to show every other year on the horizontal axis.

I can't leave the years out because there is data for those years. In Excel, there is an option to 1 display a label for every category, 2 to display a label for every other category, 3 to display a label for every third category. How do you do it in Illustrator. My table looks something like this but begins in 1980.
"2001"
52
"2002"
56
"2003"
81
"2004"
84
"2005"
91
"2006"
97
"2007"
102
"2008"
103
"2009"
104
"2010"
110
"2011"
106

Adobe Reader Pro 9 requires password for every user after seciurity updates?

Everytime I installe any Adobe Reader Pro seciurity updates like 9.4.3 and 9.4.4 on our Macs 10.6.6 and 10.6.7,
I had to input admin password for every user as reader is stoppng on install updates screen,
We have some hotmacs that are shared so it's a bit of a pain. Users don't have admin acess
to be able to install software on them.
How do I resolve this?
Here's what I tried. None of these things resolved the problem for me.
Repair disk permissions.
Restart the Mac.
Repair Adobe installation

Hi Sorry, the product in qusitons is Adobe Acrobat Pro 9.4.4 and 9.3.4 updates.
If you launch Acrobat Pro as the admin user, then authorise when requested, does that fix the problem for all users?
Or does this happen every time, for each user?
It does prompt for password for every user, thefore my flustration we have multiple editors using a Hotmac.
And we have to enter the password at least one time for every user after stupid seciurity update.
Presumably, Acrobat is trying to write to a location that Standard users don't have permission for.
Standard users don't have admin access to Mac but still I find adobe behevior very annoying.
I think this is normal enterpirse practise.
What happens if you allow write access to the Acrobat application folder and subcontents? Make sure you know what you're doing and how to restore it.
Would try this but still I would expect adobe to fix it updates.
Thanks,

Is it possible to save System preference settings for every user that logins to a Mac OS X?

I work at a school and we have iMacs running Mavericks 10.9 in our environment. We have them binded to our Windows domain so that way students can use their own login to access the Macs. I have a number of System preference settings that I would like to take a effect, but I only see that these settings take effect for every user. So even if I login as the Main administrator account and set settings in System Preferences, such as not allowing the Wifi symbol to show, the next user that logins will still see the wifi symbol because the setting isn't taking effect for their System preferences. Does anyone know a way to get System Preference settings to take affect for every user that logins? Maybe a script?

Modifying the user template is not supported. You can Google for people who have done it in the past. I would recommend going to official route, if possible. Here are a couple of training documents. I'm sure there is more available though more official channels.
http://training.apple.com/pdf/wp_osx_configuration_profiles_ml.pdf
https://www.apple.com/education/docs/l521219b_osx_deployment_guide_030513.pdf
http://training.apple.com/pdf/wp_integrating_active_directory_mav.pdf

SharePoint 2013 check permissions unable to find permission level for AD user

In our environment for SharePoint AD groups are associated with individual AD members and AD group is given access to SharePoint group with a permission level. When I want to check for a user who are part on the AD group using check permission to find their
SharePoint permission level it returns "none", but when I check what permission level the AD group has check permission returns correct permission level.
I am not sure if this is the right behavior for SharePoint 2013 not to display individual AD user permission using check permission, business users have to request IT every time they have to find a user permission level.

Hi,
As far as I know, the user permissions which set in AD Groups is not updated immediately to SharePoint Site. The AD group informations are converted into claims and packed into security token issued by the STS (Security Token Service).
For troubleshooting your issue,you can configure the Token Cache to a smaller value and check the permission level of the user who is granted permissions through AD group:
https://sergeluca.wordpress.com/2013/07/06/sharepoint-2013-use-ag-groups-yes-butdont-forget-the-security-token-caching-logontokencacheexpirationwindow-and-windowstokenlifetime/
Thanks,
Eric
Forum Support
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact
[email protected]
TechNet Community Support
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact
[email protected]

How to dynamically populate a manager name and level for any user who login

Hi All,
I need some help in doing this in my DB:
Table 1 is the the manager hierarchy {which basically shows the structure of every employee's org).
Table 2 is a list of all people manager ( all these usernames will also be in table 1). What i need to find is using the username from Table 2, the highest level that username exists in the manager hierarchy.
For ex:
Table 1: { What this shows is Sam is CEO and Jeff reports to him. So for Sam, he will exist on all 15 levels and Jeff will have Sam has his top level manager and then Jeff will repeat for all remaining levels till 15.
Manager Level 0 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3...Level15
Sam                       Sam     Sam     Sam         Sam
Sam                        Jeff     Jeff        Jeff          Jeff
Now in Table 2:
User Name   Manager Level/Name
Sam               Manager Level 0 Sam
Jeff                 Manager Level 1 Jeff
As you see, for each user name in Table i want to populate their high level from the manager hierarchy {their record in manager hierarchy).
Hope This helps to clear the confusion.
Thanks

Hello,
this is the forum for the tool {forum:id=260}. Please mark this question as answered, so others know that they can ignore it.
Then post again in {forum:id=75}
Regards
Marcus

Problem with "Group By" in Views - Not Displaying the Same for All Users

We have an Announcements List with its only View being set up to group by a metadata category field. We've done this many times on other kinds of lists and never had a problem. But with this list, about half the users can see only the ungrouped
set of announcements, whereas others actually see the items within their groups.
Those with "View" rights only can't see the grouped items - but that appears to be a coincidence as I promoted them to the same rights as others who can see them correctly, and that did NOT solve the problem. Everyone is using the exact same browser.
Note: the users who do NOT see the groupings see only a single category entry that displays only the name of the category list (but not the names of the actual categories within the category list). All the announcements are grouped under that one
entry for those users. This display looks exactly like it would if the categories had been left blank when the original announcements were created. But the categories are NOT blank, and the rest of the users can see them just fine, and the announcements display
within their appropriate groups.
I can't find anything in the View, the List Settings, or the User Permissions to explain this. What could be causing it, and how can I fix it?

Browser settings are controlled by central IT and are all identical.
The only difference I can detect is the second set of users (that don't see the category options) have only Read rights, whereas those with Contribute (or above) rights can see the categories. It doesn't make
sense that permissions would affect this, but I can't come up with any other differences.
Microsoft will not allow me to upload images. it says I can't upload images until they have verified my account, but there is no clue as to how, if or when that might happen. If you can tell me how to fix that, I can provide samples.

Display different level for same hierarchy value in BO 4.0

Hi Expert,
I have one question for Webi for BO 4.0
We have one hierarchy in BW side and we hope to display differet level in same report for different column
For example, column A is for level 6. column B is for level 7.
Do you know how to releaze this in Webi side?
In the 3.X version, we have different dimension for different level.
But now in BO 4, it has been combined into one\
Thanks and best regards
Alex yang

Hi,
You can still do this in BI 4.0, if you use the old 'legacy' MDX OLAP.unv from Universe Designer tool .
Yes, with the BICS connection, you are getting a native hierarchy, as it would be displayed in an OLAP environment.
Cheers,
H

To create a room for every user or not?

My application requires that guest/participants do not need to login. They only enter names. Also the meetings are not scheduled. It's on walk in basis where host waits for the guests. In my case, I will have hundreds and eventually thousands of hosts. For every host, do I need to create a new room and allocate it to only that user? Is that how the rooms supposed to used or there is any other data structure such as groups which I can use? Are there limitations to how many rooms one application can create?

Same answer, you can do both
I wouldn't create a room per customer, but you could potentially create one room per agent. You'll need to build your own application that would allow your to select the correct agent given the customer needs, but you need to do that anyway.
Once you know the agent, again, having the agent always enter his/her room and wait for customers, or have the agent enter a random room and then pair it with a customer is pretty much the same.
Fixed rooms will save you to manage room creation/deletion (you will still need to create a room when a new agent joins a company and remove it when he leaves, but that can be part of the normal management of agents).
One feature that we are planning to add is rooms that "autodelete" when the session terminate, so you can easily create a random room on the fly and don't have to remeber to cleanup.
But basically I think what you do depends on a couple of workflows :
1) A host (teacher, agent, advisor) has routinely scheduled sessions with customers (or students). In this case it may be easier to have a fixed room for the host and direct the guests to that room for the scheduled session (again, using external authentication you can guarantee that only users registered or authorized for that session can join that room)
2) Two users (host/guest, agent/customer, two random users, etc.) wants to initiate an ad-hoc conversation. In this case it may be easier to create a room on the fly (or pick a room from a pool of existing rooms) and direct both users to that room.
As I said in the previous post the serverIntegration modules are your friends here: they have all the methods to create/delete rooms, create authentication tokens and in general manage your account.

Actions not displaying in Overview for ONE user ID

Hi Frnz...
For only ONE user ID Actions not displaying in Overview tab.
For this User ID Overview details are visible for some Employee IDs and for some its not visible.
Already checked Roles & Authorisations and IT 0302 & 0000 are active. Have also run RPUEVSUP.
Just to add.. this query is happening while a technical upgrade has happened from 4.6 to 6.0.
Pls help me ..
Rgds.. Raj

Hi,
I hope you have done this but FYR
Before clicking on the overview button maintain the dates as 01.01.1900 and 31.12.9999
Thanks
ABHI

Display Stock level for every user

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for