DIY 2 routers w/o cascading

Hi, just wanted to share my exprience with adding a linksys wireless router wrt54gs v.6 to my existing network which already has a router on it. You might ask why did you add another router and the answer is simple it was cheaper to get then the standard WAP by about $30 US dollars "they were running a special".
I currently have this setup
Wall to cable modem
Cable modem to Netgear router w/firewall & vpn
Netgear "last port" to linksys port 4
computers connected to netgear
servers, printers & wireless connected to linksys
all on the same ip scheme.
My network uses a netgear as the dhcp and everything on the linksys looks to it for dhcp.
When I first got the linksys I tried to follow the instructions and cascade the 2 routers then came to find out that by doing that everything on the Netgear would not talk to the computers on the linsys. So its easy to say that is not what I was looking for. This is what I did
Attached linksys router to my computer and started it up went into the configuration "refer to your documentation" SAVE YOUR SETTINGS AFTER EACH CHANGE!
Turn off dhcp "very important" SAVE
Assign a static ip address to your router from your current network. Example...Main router is 192.168.0.1 so make your linksys 192.168.0.5 SAVE
Go to setup and advanced routing and select the drop down box that says Gateway and switch it to router. Was the top selection on my menu. SAVE
Reattach your computer to your existing network and cycle the power or just pull a new ip address.
Go into your current network router/gateway which is curretnly assigningyour IP address and tell it to start at giving out address at 192.168.0.50. By doing this you have about 49 static ip's to use for servers, wap's & printers.
Plug in your Linksys home router into the network there are a few ways can do this.
Make a crossover cable or buy one and plug it into your main router "ex port 4" then take the cable and plug it into the linksys router "ex port 4" DO NOT CONNECT TO THE DESIGNATED INTERNET PORT
If your current router has a uplink port "check your documentation" you can use a standard ethernet cable and plug into that and then plug into your linksys router. DO NOT CONNECT TO THE DESIGNATED INTERNET PORT
Message Edited by Konoko on 10-29-200611:13 AM

actually, you can still do that
1) add static routes for all your vpn servers ip addresses, e.g, route add europe.myvpn.com gw <my isp's default gateway> dev <my device>
for ease of use, add all your routes to a bash script, and then run it from rc.local
2) before connecting to the vpn, you need to disable your default route through eth0/etc , but doing so, you will not be able to connect at all as your myCon config file uses a dns name in the pty parameter instead of the vpn servers ip address, either change it in the config file, or add all those dns-ip mappings to /etc/hosts
3) create multiple ppp config files with different pty parameters, and you can then execute them using a normal bash script containing, pon myEuropeVPN, pon myAsiaVPN, etc.
Last edited by Sin.citadel (2010-06-10 18:14:23)

Similar Messages

  • EA3500 in bridge/repeater mode - can't get it working!

    Hi all,
    I have a EA3500 as my primary wireless router. I have cable service and my EA3500's WAN port is connected to my cable modem. I have a few devices (NAS, etc) connected to LAN ports via Ethernet and other devices that connect wirelessly. With the single router, everything works fine.
    My issues are when trying to add a second EA3500 to extend the range of my network. I've tried following Linksys' instructions on bridge mode as well as cascading (LAN to LAN).
    No matter what I try, I can't get the second router to work properly. My main router is set to a LAN address of 192.168.11.1 and I am setting the second to 192.168.11.2. I am also setting the SSID and security settings the same on both routers. However, once the second router reboots I have devices connecting to it which are then unable to reach the Internet.
    My end goal is to have the second router in a media room where my PlayStation, TV, and audio components will be able to connect to it and access both my NAS on the LAN and the Internet. Can anyone provide instructions on exactly how to set these things up? I'm about to throw both of these in the trash and start over with a different brand. 
    Thanks in advance!
    Jim

    Hello lootcorp,
    Try checking the connections between the modem, 1st EA3500, and the 2nd EA3500. See which ethernet cables are connected from one port to another (from the modem to the 1st and 2nd router. Try changing ethernet cables if possible. To cascade the routers using LAN to LAN method, here's a link:
    Cascading or Connecting a Linksys router to another router
    Do not forget to reset the routers before you cascade them. I would opt for the LAN to WAN method of cascading. That way, you have 2 sets of wireless networks with different SSIDs and passwords.
    Bonne Chance and keep us in the loop.

  • Guest Network DHCP

    Hi All,
    Here's my situation, I have installed 5 Cisco Linksys EA2700 wireless routers in a cascade fashion off of my main switch throughout the building. I have turned off DHCP and NAT since I have a DHCP server assigning IP's. Basically I'm using them as Access Points.
    and they are working well!
    Now, I would like to advertise the guest network.
    When I enable the guest network on one of the routers I do see the SSID. But I cannot connect to the network. It doesn't even prompt me for a password. From my reading it is supposed to give me a 192.168.33.x address, but I don't think it is serving out IP's
    Any ideas?
    Thanks in advance!

    you will be prompted for the guest network password when you open a web browser. once you entered the correct password, your device will then be assigned an IP address to access the Internet.

  • E3000 to SPA2102 VOIP Adapter

    I have seen this question asked, but never answerd http://homecommunity.cisco.com/t5/Wireless-Routers/Linksys-E3000-cascaded-VoiP-router-not-working/td...
    What is the best method (the one that works) to connect the E3000 with the SPA2102 phone adapter? Or, is it not possible? Thanks.

    Wow. That is one REALLY messed up guide. I now have more questions than before I read the guide!
    I am not at all familiar with networking. Please bear with me. I am trying to connect a Cisco E3000 with a SPA2102 voip router.
    1. From the guide, it appears I want to use a LAN-LAN setup. That would have the Voip router downstream from the E3000, right?
    2. The guide indicates the local IP address for what I will call the E3000 (since the guide does not reference a specific model, but instead refers to "router", "second router", "voip router", and "Linksys router", and references a different IP address for the non-voip router than used by the E3000) should be "on the same IP segment". Does this mean identical IP adddress, or does it mean setting the two at different IP addresses, such as the E3000 at its default setting of 192.168.1.1 and leaving the voip router at  its default of 192.168.0.1? Or would I need to change the Voip router to 192.168.1.2?
    3. Next, the Guide indicates the internet connection type as set to Automatic Configuration - DHCP. My internet connection uses PPPOE. I assume I may leave that setting at PPPOE.
    4. The guide then indicates the Network Addres Server Settings in the E3000 should be set to "DHCP Server: Disable". I would need to reset the range to include the Voip router IP, right?
    5. The guide then indicates that the operating mode of the E3000 must be set to "router" instead of "advanced routing". However, the Cisco Setup in that router does not have an option to make that change, under Advanced Routing the only choices are "NAT", "Dynamic Routing (NAP)", and "Static routing" and each have enable/disable or, with static, various input options.
    I would think there are many users with the E3000 that use Voip service. And, since I am using two Cisco Linksys products this set up should be something that is not this confusing. Any clarification or assistance anyone might offer is much appreciated. Thanks.

  • Cascaded routers as one mega-wifi--network?

    Hi,
    Right now, I have 3 Cisco/linksys routers linked together in my house.
    1) Master (connected to modem)WRT160Nv3
    2) WRT54G2
    3) WRT54G
    As of now, I have them cascaded properly, and they each have their own wi-fi name.
    You can acces the internet from any of them, because they are all connected to the WRT160Nv3
    Is there any way to make these one big, single wi-fi network, not 3 separate ones? ex, with seamless transitions between routers?

    Yes. Set them up as access point. Assuming the WRT160N is still on LAN IP 192.168.1.1 set up the second WRT as follows:
    1. Internet connection type to Automatic/DHCP.
    2. LAN IP 192.168.1.2
    3. Disable DHCP server.
    4. Wire one of the LAN ports of the second WRT to a LAN port of the main.
    Do the same with the third except choosing 192.168.1.3 for LAN IP address.
    For a wireless roaming network, choose identical SSID, wireless encryption, and passphrase. Make sure SSID broadcast is enabled on all WRTs. Choose different channels on each, e.g. 1,6,11 for best performance on all access points.
    Good wireless clients should now be able to roam seamlessly between access points. But how well it works depends on the wireless card and the driver implementation. Some drivers will remain connected until the connection is lost and will then reconnect which will result in a brief interruption.

  • Opening ports on cascading routers

    hello everyone this is my first time here so hopefully I'll post up all the info you need the first time. I have 2 wrt54g routers cascading off of each other. The first wrt54g(#1) is connected directly to my cable modem the wrt54g(#2) is connected to wrt54g(#1) by a cable running from the Lan port on wrt54g(#1) to the WAN port on wrt54g(#2). All devices connected to both routers work fine except my Xbox360 that's connected to my wrt54g(#2). I can get onto xbox live but my Nat setttings are set to moderate keeping me from finding alot of games online. What I need to do is get ports 3074 & 88 open but I can't figure out how to do this with the cascading routers. How would I go about opening those ports? Do I need to give you more information?

    As you have 2 Wireless Router and they are setup in a 2 Different Networks, If you open the ports on your 2nd router, your 1st Router will Block the Ports for XBOX. So i think in this case you need to Open the Ports on your Both the Routers.
    First you need to login to your 2nd Router setup page, click Here and this will guide you how to enable port forwarding on your router for XBOX. 
    Once you do the settings on your 2nd router, now you need to login to the 1st router setup page and again you need to do the Port tirgerring and click on save settings. Now check if you are able to play and join the games on your XBOX. I might think this should solve the problem. 

  • Cascading two Linksys routers questions

    wanted to clear up some things before I purchase my 2nd router.
    So currently, i have a wrt54g2 connected to my cable modem.
    What I want to do is add a wireless n router with gigabit to my LAN.
    So I would just follow the instructions on cascading the routers here: http://linksys.custhelp.com/cgi-bin/linksys.cfg/php/enduser/std_adp.php?p_faqid=3733&p_created=11520...
    This makes the router a repeater pretty much and uses the same IP for the new computers, 192.168.1.x
    So my question is, if I connected to the 2nd router via LAN will I be also in the same IP range and can see the other computers on the first router?
    Reason why I'm doing this, old router hosts just normal everyday computers via wifi and lan ports.
    New router will handle htpc and media storage server via lan ports and netflix streaming via wifi.
    Thats why I want the gigabit ports, b/c there will be alot of media transferred between the htpc and media storage server.
    I'm using the wireless n for a samsung blu-ray player that can do netflix, pandora and also read shared drives.  It can read divx and h.264, so I thought the wireless n throughput will be fine on N and not bogged on g.
    any opinions and help would be appreciated.

    Yes, the second router will be in the same network range and the device which will be connected to the second router wil get the IP from the first router. To do so you need to the disable the DHCP on your second router.

  • Cascading two linksys routers

    I am trying to cascade my two WRT54GL routers, but can't get my second router to see internet.
    My problem:
    I want to have to separate wireless networks. One network from router 1 (main router, both wireless and wired IP "clients") and a pure wireless network from router 2. I want to be sure that the guy in 1st floor that shares my adsl connection, is using the wireless network from router 2, and dont have access to network from router 1.
    I thought I could accomplish this following alt 2 on the link:
    Cascading the linksys router to Another Linksys Router (WAN-LAN)http://www.extremepcmakeovers.com/tips/ho w-tos/cascade_linksys/ 
    My setup is:
    The main router IP. 10.104.211.197
    specified as gateaway in router seup
    DHCP server gives out IP adresser from 10.104.211.65 to 10.104.211.xx.
    I have internet connection using network from main router. All the IP clients/ consumers connected to main router has internet connection.
    So now I want to isolate the guy in first floor to another network. I have connected ethernet cable from my main router LAN to my second router WAN (internet side).Second router is specified as gateaway IP 10.104.211.70
    DHPCP server and gives out IP adresses from 10.104.211.71 to 10.104.211.xx
    Router IP adress is not taken by IP clients connected to main router, that means no IP conflict. But I can not get internet connection from second router.
    I really appreciate if someone could help me with this.

    I did get some help using live chat with linksys support yesterday. I now have internet connection from both networks. It is working now without configuration in the advanced routing tab. On both routers default values are used there (gateway and no destination IP are given).
    Here is my setup:
    Router 1= main router
    Router 2 have cable from router 1 port 3 to internet side of router.
    Router 1 is configured as DHCP server with local ip adress of 10.104.211.197, and gives out IP adresses starting from 10.104.211.64
    Router 2 is configured as a static IP with local IP adress of 10.104.210.70, and internet IP adress 10.104.211.50
    gateaway and static DNS1 is defined as the local IP adress of router 1.
    DNS2 is defined as 4.2.2.2
    Router 2 gives out IP adresses from 10.104.210.71.
    In the status tab
    Router 1 has the IP adress, gateaways, DNS1 of 193.xxxxxxxxx
    Router 2 has login type static, ip adress 10.104.211.50, default gateaway and DNS1 as local IP adress of router 1.
    So using this configuration I now have two separated networks that both can see internet. However, I have lost the internet connection several times the last 30 hours. I suspect there is something in my setup that leads to a unstable router/routers. When I loose internet connection I go to the status tab on router 1 and sees that the IP adresses are not 193.xxx but "default" values like 10.0.0.138 etc...so I then have to release and reneaw DHCP before I am online again.
    Does anyone have any clue if my setup gives poor stability???

  • Cascaded routers: no internet access when second router not use NAT

    Cascaded routers: no internet access when second router not use NAT
    Here is my setup:
    [pre]
    WAN
    |
    | 74.96.170.x (WAN IP)         |
    | Router1(Verizon FiOS Router) |
    | Model: MI424WR-GEN2 (Rev F)  |
    | Firmware: 20.21.0.2          |
    | Def router: 74.96.170.1      |
    | 192.168.1.1 (Local IP)       |
    |
    |  192.168.1.22 (WAN IP)   |
    |  Router2(Linksys)        |
    |  Model: WRT54GL v1.1     |
    |  Firmware: v4.30.16      |
    |  Def Router: 192.168.1.1 |
    |  192.168.2.1 (Local IP)  |
    |
    | Computer 192.168.2.160   |
    | Def Router: 192.168.2.1  |
    "q.route" 120L, 4441C written
    [m.wang@m-wang-ltm2:/Users/m.wang/m/Network]
    $ more q.route 
    Cascaded routers: no internet access when second router not use NAT
    Here is my setup:
    [pre]
    WAN 

    | 74.96.170.x (WAN IP)         | 
    | Router1(Verizon FiOS Router) | 
    | Model: MI424WR-GEN2 (Rev F)  | 
    | Firmware: 20.21.0.2          |
    | Def router: 74.96.170.1      |
    | 192.168.1.1 (Local IP)       | 
    |
    |  192.168.1.22 (WAN IP)   | 
    |  Router2(Linksys)        | 
    |  Model: WRT54GL v1.1     |
    |  Firmware: v4.30.16      |
    |  Def Router: 192.168.1.1 |
    |  192.168.2.1 (Local IP)  |
    |
    | Computer 192.168.2.160   | 
    | Def Router: 192.168.2.1  | 
    | NO iptables, basic setup |
    [/pre]
    On computer, I have:
    [pre]
    # route
    Kernel IP routing table
    Destination     Gateway         Genmask         Flags Metric Ref    Use Iface
    default         192.168.2.1     0.0.0.0         UG    2      0        0 enp2s0
    loopback        localhost       255.0.0.0       UG    0      0        0 lo
    192.168.2.0     *               255.255.255.0   U     0      0        0 enp2s0
    [/pre]
    On Router2, I have:
    [pre]
    Routing Table Entry List
    Destination LAN IP | Subnet Mask   | Gateway   | Hop Count | Interface
    192.168.2.0          255.255.255.0   0.0.0.0     1           LAN & Wireless
    192.168.1.0          255.255.255.0   0.0.0.0     1           WAN (Internet)
    0.0.0.0              0.0.0.0         192.168.1.1 1           WAN (Internet)
    [/pre]
    Router2's Operating Mode is Gateway. On Router1, I have: 
    [pre]
    [Router1] Routing Table
    Name                  Destination Gateway      Netmask       Metric   Status
    Network (Home/Office) 192.168.2.0 192.168.1.22 255.255.255.0 0        Applied 
    Network (Home/Office) 192.168.1.0 192.168.1.1  255.255.255.0 0        Applied 
    Routing Protocol: Internet Group Management Protocol (IGMP)
    Default Gateway: 74.96.170.1
    [/pre]
    On computer, I can run tcptraceroute to yahoo.com OK:
    [pre]
    # tcptraceroute yahoo.com
    Selected device enp2s0, address 192.168.2.160, port 46596 for outgoing packets
    Tracing the path to yahoo.com (206.190.36.45) on TCP port 80 (http), 30 hops max
     1  192.168.2.1  0.610 ms  0.729 ms  0.735 ms
     2  192.168.1.1  1.843 ms  1.378 ms  1.363 ms
     3  l100.washdc-vfttp-107.verizon-gni.net (96.241.146.1)  13.620 ms * *
    ... /* It reached the destination. */
    [/pre]
    I want to change Router2's Operating Mode from "Gateway" to "Router" because I
    want to turn off NAT on Router2 so that I can access all computers attached to
    Router2 by their individual IP instead of using port forwarding at Router2.
    The problem is after the mode change from "Gateway" to "Router", and regardless
    whether I disable RIP or enable RIP, and on what interfaces it is enabled, computer
    192.168.2.160 does not have internet connection. 
    Observations:
    [0] INTRAnet works as I can reach computer 192.168.2.160 from computer behind Router1
    192.168.1.x and vice versa.
    [1] ping and traceroute *work* on Router2 itself using the built-in dianostic tool.
    [2] nslookup on computer 192.168.2.160 always works on new lookup. It uses
    192.168.2.1 as the resolver.
    [3] tcptraceroute stops after step 2:
    [pre]
    # tcptraceroute yahoo.com
    Selected device enp2s0, address 192.168.2.160, port 45999 for outgoing packets
    Tracing the path to yahoo.com (98.139.183.24) on TCP port 80 (http), 30 hops max
     1  192.168.2.1  2.553 ms  0.534 ms  0.638 ms
     2  192.168.1.1  1.342 ms  0.964 ms  0.867 ms
     3  * * *
    [/pre]
    [4] tcpdump shows that computer 192.168.2.160 tries to reach out and nothing is returned:
    [pre]
    13:34:03.172828 IP 192.168.2.160.45999 > 98.139.183.24.http: Flags [S], seq 1122548929, win 0, length 0
    13:34:06.175786 IP 192.168.2.160.45999 > 98.139.183.24.http: Flags [S], seq 1122548929, win 0, length 0
    13:34:09.178804 IP 192.168.2.160.45999 > 98.139.183.24.http: Flags [S], seq 1122548929, win 0, length 0
    [/pre]
    This is not expected because NAT to internet should still be done by Router1, no? Computer
    behind Router1 with IP 192.168.1.x has internet connection.
    [5] It looks like I cannot change the Routing Table Entry on Router2. I do not think I need to change anything,
    just an observation.
    [6] If I use LAN to LAN connection, then both intranet and internet works. [The internet IP of Router2 can be
    anything not in the same subnet of the Router1, and DHCP on the local side should be disabled to avoid conflict
    with the the DHCP on Router1].

    I have a question. Unfortunately in order to ask my question, I have to have a lengthy description of my setup. Basically, I have a second Linksys router in "router" operating mode with NAT disabled connected to the Verizon router, and I have a computer which is in a different subnet (192.168.2.x) behind the Linksys router. This computer can communicate with computers behind Verizon router in subnet (192.168.1.x), but cannot reach internet. This is a simplified version of my question, full details are in the original post.
    If I setup the Linksys router in "gateway" operating mode, which means with NAT enabled, then both intranet and internet works, but there is no easy way to setup port forwarding for 10 compueters in 192.168.2.x network to communicate with 10 computers in 192.168.1.x network.
    If I setup the Linksys router in a LAN to LAN configuration with Verizon routers, but this way all computers are in the same subnet, I want them to be in different subnet for access control and things like that.
    I hope this makes things a little clear.
    Thanks.

  • Cascading Routers and DCHP issues........

    I am having trouble getting the wrt54g not to be a DCHP server even though  I have turned off that option.  I have cascaded the wrt54g to a Netgear 814 wireless router. The 814 has had DCPH turned off and all IP addresses are assigned by the DLS modem in the 172.16.1.xx range. This set has worked fine for several years.  I have successfully cascaded the wrt54g to the 814 and assigned the wrt54g an IP address in the correct range and any devices that are connected to the wrt54g via the Ethernet ports get assigned IP address on the 172.xxx subnet and can see and access all shared devices on the network. But when I connect to the wrt54g via wireless, my laptop  gets assigned an IP address in the 192.168.1.xx range, preventing me from accessing any shared devices on the network.  I’ve got the wrt54g set as a router, no DCHP, with an IP address of 172.16.1.39. the connection between the two routers is Ethernet to Ethernet. Any suggestions on what I am doing wrong? thanks

    Follow this LINK and let us know if you still have problems.  The one thing I can see now is that the Netgear router or the WRT54G's IP address needs to changed so they match.  Example:  Netgear: 192.168.1.1   WRT54G: 192.168.1.2 but can be in either IP range.
    Richard Aichner (Ikester)

  • Can I use the PLEK500 Powerline Home Plug AV2 to cascade two EA6700 routers, plus?

    Can I use the PLEK500 Powerline Home Plug AV2 to cascade two EA6700 routers?  In otherwords, can I connect my “main router” to a PLEK500 on the third floor . . . then plug in another PLEK500 in the basement (same power lines) and use the Ethernet socket on the PLEK500 to plug into the second EA6700 in a LAN to LAN cascade?  And, if so, can I also use that second EA6700 to run an Ethernet cable to an access point at one end of the house and a different Ethernet cable underground to an out building where I can connect a third EA6700? Finally, from there to a second out building by connecting an Ethernet cable from the third router, underground again, to a 4th EA6700 in the second out building?  All connected LAN to LAN to the main router?  My problem in a nutshell: the main router is on the third floor with no way to run Ethernet cable to the rest of the house.  If I can make the first cascade via the PLEK500 to the basement router, I have access to run an Ethernet cable, via underground pipe, from the basement to the first out building and from that building to the second out building.  I need wireless access to the lower floors of the main house as well as the two out buildings.

    Yes, that is theoretically possible. You just need to make sure that you are using the same circuit for those two power lines to work. You could also refer to this link: http://kb.linksys.com/Linksys/ukp.aspx?vw=1&docid=83217d7598ad44d68d9cc60f1cea9887_Different_ways_in... for different ways on how to configure a router.

  • Wanting to cascade 2 Linksys WRT310N wireless routers

    What would be the most likely settings for cascading a pair of WRT310N wireless routers together so that 1) all computers on the network operate as if it's a LAN, 2) all retain gigabit 'wired' capability, and 3) both routers can also be used as wireless access points (or one as a range extender to the original hooked to the modem)? 
    I've tried it via the AskLinksys directions with little success.  I had initial success in briefly having internet on the 2nd router-equipped computer (via wired) but had no access to other computers on the LAN (i.e. could not share iTunes libraries nor do file transfers via Appletalk).  Trying to follow the directions and switch the second router to 192.168.2.1 leaves the 2nd router unable to be reaccessed via browser to adjust settings.  It also doesn't appear to achieve anything.  I have better luck with router 2 at 192.168.1.2 in that at least you can access and adjust settings on router 2 thereafter but...  after the brief success in having internet, I've not been able to get internet access on the computers on the 2nd router since (I did happen to have the 3 Macs notice each other but the 2nd pair of Macs on router 2 couldn't surf the internet).
    The running tally of devices intended to be included in the network:
    3 Macs (iMac and 2 mini's)  -- 1 in one room with a PC, the others in another room together with a Wii.
    1 PC (running XP)
    1 XBox 360 (upstairs, sharing router access with the iMac and PC)
    1 Nintendo Wii (sharing router 2 with the 2 Mac mini's via wireless)
    I also have a pair of Gigabit switches (5 port) I am hoping to include in the network at some point in the event I need room to expand the wired access.  At the moment though I'm more curious about getting both routers enabled and working.  I want to have one be the primary router (connected to an Arris Telephony Cable Modem via Comcast as well as the iMac and PC and an XBox360) and the other work as a switch for additional computers (2 Mac mini's) in another room as well as a wireless access point/range extender (set forth for wireless connection to a Wii).
    Both WRT310N's are running the latest firmware available (v1.0.07 build 014-LS-HNDreplace_date("Dec. 1, 2008");Dec 1, 2008).
    Any help would be greatly appreciated!

    1. Connect your modem to Router #1 on it's Internet Port, configure the Router #1 for initial internet access(I hope it is already)...
    2. Do not connect Router 1 to Router 2...Just connect a computer to Router #2 on Port1 and access router #2, change the LAN/Local IP Address of Router #2 to 192.168.1.2(assuming router #1 is running an IP Address of 192.168.1.1) and disable the DHCP/DHCP Server(Router 2) and click on Save Settings...
    3. Connect Router #1 from it's Ethernet Port to the Router #2 on it's Ethernet Port(LAN - LAN Connection)...This way you will have just one network and computer's connected to Router 1 will be able to communicate with the computer's connected to Router 2...
    4. You may now connect your Switch to any unused ethernet port on your router...

  • Cascade 2 EA2700 routers, what settings

    I have two EA2700 routers that I'm cascading.  I have the main router with DHCP on and the second router with DHCP off.  The second router is connected to the main router via the LAN port.  I seem to be getting very poor speed and even connectivity errors when devices are connected to the second router wirelessly.  What other settings need to be changed on the second router?  I haven't changed anything on it other than setting DHCP off.  Also, both main and secondary router have the same wireless network name but many of my devices seem to be connected to the second one since it's closer.
    Any help or suggestions?  As of now, my wireless connection is basically useless.

    Try to upgrade the router’s firmware and then reset the router afterwards. This would eradicate any bugs from the router. You can actually change the router’s wireless settings or better yet, consider using different SSIDs for each router. Use a wifi analyzer tool like http://www.metageek.net/products/inssider/ to select a non-overlapping channel to your router. You can also relocate the router to a more central and elevated location for a better signal coverage. Another option is to set the 2nd router to bridge. You can refer to this link: http://kb.linksys.com/Linksys/ukp.aspx?pid=80&vw=1&articleid=24583 for more information.  

  • Cascade 2 routers?

    New to the forum, so I apologize if this has been covered. It probably has and if so directions to the correct thread would be appreciated.
    I originally installed a Linksys 4 port router in my home. When we had this house built I wired it for ethernet myself. The point where the router is installed is very near the phone company debark as it enters the house. Problem is back then wireless was a thing of the future and since everything ran on cables it didn't matter that this thing was off on one end of the house.
    Now it does matter, because with the advent of wireless I have upgraded to a Linksys WRT54G2 a couple years ago (I think). But NOW I'm developing 2 new problems. The first (1) is that I don't have enough ports to support all the wired devices we could have connected - I'm flat out of ports and need at least 2 more. The second (2) problem is the wireless signal is just weak enough to drop signals on some devices in the farthest reaches of our network. Most work fine (laptops) but some do not (Kindle, smart phones).
    What I want to do is install a new 8 port router at the current router location (solves problem 1). I want to then move the existing WRT54G2 to a more central location and connect it to the first router which I hope will solve problem (2).
    I'd like some advice on what 8-port router to buy, and any advice on installation of a cascade system of routers like this.
    It seems like all I see nowadays are wireless routers. If the new 8-port router is a wireless router will it interfere with the other wireless router, or can they be used together to boost the signal even more?
    Thanks in advance for any help you may offer!
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    Again: do you have an ethernet cable running between both rooms??
    If you have an ethernet cable or it's relatively easy too install one you want to use an ethernet cable and not a wireless bridge, in particular of you have a media center on one end and think about video streaming or similar.
    If you have an ethernet connection you don't want a wireless bridge nor a wireless repeater. You don't want a WES610N nor a RE1000. Both devices connect wirelessly to your main router. You don't want to do that if you have a wired connection already.
    A wired connection is far superior to a wireless link. It's like 95 MBit/s error-free compared to maybe 20 Mbit/s (under very good circumstances, no interference and both devices not too far apart). And the wireless link is "shared" with your neighbors. The 95 Mbit/s on the cable are yours only.
    If you have an ethernet cable you thus want a switch like the SE2500. And you want an access point. An access point connects wireless clients to your wired network. Directly. Not through another wireless link to your main router. You connect an access point like the WAP610N.
    Or a wireless router like the new E series router. You can configure the E series router as access point. And the E series router comes with a 4 port LAN port, i.e. you get 4 ethernet ports on that end.

  • Cascaded Routers: BEFSR81 primary, WRT54GX2 secondary

    I have had a Linksys, 8-port ethernet router for about 7 years and it works fine. I recently got a laptop with a Linksys WPC54GS pc-card wireless adapter. I purchased a Linksys WRT54GX2 wireless router for the laptop. I wanted to add (cascade) the wireless router to the ethernet router. I had a lot of trouble getting it to work, so, long story short, I spent a couple hours on the phone with Linksys support and here's what I learned: The proper wiring configuration is: High-speed internet connection connected to the ethernet (primary) router. Wireless (secondary)router connected to the ethernet router using a regular, numbered port on each. Don't use the "uplink" port on the primary router or the "ethernet" port on the wireless router. I have Windows XP on my laptop, so I needed to use WEP security, not WPA. As far as IP addresses for the routers, the subnet number (192.168.x.#, where x is the subnet) had to match. Disable DHCP and NAT on the wireless router. I did the initial configuration of the wireless router with an ethernet cable connected to the laptop. After that(turned off DHCP), getting to the internal configuration page on the wireless router over the ethernet cable required a static IP address with the default gateway set to the IP address of the wireless router. Now that the entire system is up and running, I can get to the wireless router config page wirelessly using a DHCP address, static address not required. Hope all this helps someone, sometime. -J

    Thank you for sharing your experience and information. Hope it will help many users.

Maybe you are looking for