♕ Does Meraki Deliver Sourcefire, WAAS, Prime, ISE, and basic Routing in 1 Box?
Rob Boyd on TechWiseTV: Meraki and the Cisco Cloud coming to the realization himself that Meraki is misunderstood within Cisco as a niche SMB product.
Does a Meraki MX100 (500Mbps/500Users) Security Device acting as the layer 3 Ethernet aggregation switch and WAN gateway deliver the following all in 1 dashboard under 2 affordable part#’s without installing a single server?
L7-ALG/ Firewall
Basic Routing
ISE
SourceFIRE
Prime/ LMS
WAAS
Websense
4G failover backup capability
Thanks for the feedback Collin. Would you be able to help me understand the value of getting Cisco System vs Meraki Security Device. Nothing too specific. I simply had a look at the MX100 and was impressed at the leaps in innovation. Colin what are you concerns regarding the MX100?
Similar Messages
-
WAAS network module and 2821 router?
What WAE network modules will work in a 2821 router? This 2821 has a dual-T1 Multipoint connection back to our data center and I know that the users will benefit greatly from WAAS, but I'd rather not have to upgrade the router to a 3800 just to install a WAE module
NME-WAE-502 will give you full functionality with the enterprise licence. This is the NME that is the most widely used for WAAS.
NME-WAE-302 is available, but only supports the transport license which give you TCP optimizations only (no application AO support).
NME-WAE-522 is only supported in the 3800 series routers.
Hope that helps,
Dan -
How does QoS work with WAAS WCCP? What's the interaction between Router QoS Traffic Classification and WAE Traffic Application Policy?
By default, WAAS preserves the DSCP marking on intercepted packets. There is a configuration option to set/override the DSCP value at the global (device), application, and classifier levels. Currently WAAS provides marking only. There is no action taken by WAAS based on the DSCP value.
Regards,
Zach -
Hi there,
I'm deploying Cisco UC Integration Lync 9.2(5). There's a QoS portion which states that you can install Cisco Media Services Interface on the user's PC and is to be used with Cisco Prime Collaboration or MediaNet:
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucilync/9/CUCI_BK_C0545A41_00_cisco-uc-integration-for-microsoft/CUCI_BK_C0545A41_00_cisco-uc-integration-for-microsoft_chapter_010.html#CUCI_CN_IDBE72E9_00
If we don't have Cisco Prime Collaboration or MediaNet, does Cisco Media Services Interface mark RTP and Siganling packets on the outbound regardless? Or do I have to manually set the DSCP values for the PC?
Thanks,
JohnWhen you were placing the internal test calls, where was your phone located? The RTP streams are usually only set up between the two endpoints (assuming no transcoder or MTP is used).
Have you have already checked calls between IP phones at your central site (where Unity is located) and IP Phones at site A? Are these working fine? If not, then it's likely you do have a QoS issue over the WAN to Site A.
Have you confirmed whether or not calls from the PSTN gateway at site A experience any voice QoS issues when transferred to an IP Phone at the central site?
Is the same codec is being used for the MGCP gateway as for IP Phones at that site (check the Region settings for the Device Pool it's in)?
If these things have all been checked, then you may want to consider collecting a simultaneous sniffer trace from each end of a single call, and comparing what's seen at the two endpoints.
Kind regards,
Craig -
ISE and WLC for posture remediation
Please can anybody clarify a few things in relation to ISE and wireless posture.
1) Is the ACL-POSTURE-REDIRECT used for remediation, or is it just an ACL to redirect only some traffic to kickoff posture checking?
2) Can/Should a dACL/wACL be specified as a remediation ACL?
3) Do the WLC ACLs have to be written in long format (manually specifying source and dest ports/doesny direction any work?)
4) Does anybody have working example ACLs for posture redirect (cpp) and remediation (dACL)?
5) Any other advice or pointers would be helpful too as no docs i have found so far, be it TrustSec2, CiscoLive or anything else, dont seem to help me understand WLC posture and remediation
thanks
NickNick,
Answers are inline:
1) Is the ACL-POSTURE-REDIRECT used for remediation, or is it just an ACL to redirect only some traffic to kickoff posture checking? This is for both (if ports 8905..are included) then this is for initial redirection, and remediation
2) Can/Should a dACL/wACL be specified as a remediation ACL? Wireless does not support DACL, you will have to reference another ACL in the the authorization policy, the new versions have the Airespace ACL field, where you will have the ACL defined locally on the wlc.
3) Do the WLC ACLs have to be written in long format (manually specifying source and dest ports/doesny direction any work?) Yes you have to add two entries, for example for all traffic redirection to ise...source = any, destination=iseipadd, source port=any, destination port=any direction=any action=permit
source=iseipaddr, destination ip = any, source port=any, destination port=any, direction=any action permit. Its not the easiest but I will attach a screenshot that will show you my example.
4) Does anybody have working example ACLs for posture redirect (cpp) and remediation (dACL)? ISE doesnt support DACLs so when you build your authorization profile in ISE you select the web authentication type (Posture Discovery) after that the ACL field will come up, there you will "call" the posture ACL which is defined on your controller.
5) Any other advice or pointers would be helpful too as no docs i have found so far, be it TrustSec2, CiscoLive or anything else, dont seem to help me understand WLC posture and remediation Keep in mind that you have to have radius NAC and AAA override enabled under the advanced settings for COA to work.
You have to turn on COA under the global settings in ISE (Administration > Profiling > Coa Type > Reauth)
Then you have to build your policies so that when a user connects to the network they are redirected to the download the nac agent (this is where the Posture Discovery and redirect ACL work in tandem).
Once the client download the nac agent and is compliant the report is forwarded to ISE where a COA event is triggered.
Then the client will reauthenticate and will hit another policy that will give them access once their machine is compliant, you can set the ACLs for restricted access, use dynamic vlan assignment, or just send the access-accept.
Thanks,
Tarik Admani
*Please rate helpful posts* -
Hp prime Copy and pasting problems
Does any one know why the HP prime copy and paste function does not work properly. For example when I copy and past form the spreadsheet to the statistics 1 var app nothing happens. Perhaps there is a work around that will allow me to avoid this problem or another firmware that I can download.
Please note that i am using Software version: 2015 6 17 (8151)
Hardware Version: A
CAS Version: 1.1.2-11
Operating System: 4CY35605VB I don’t think I’m doing anything wrong, however I should point out that when I copy from statistic 1 or 2 Var apps and paste to the spreadsheet app that everything works fine. The problem persists when when I reverse the direction, and copy from the spreadsheet and paste to the statistics 1 or 2 Var apps. I should also note that this problem does not occur with the HP Prime emulator.Hi!, mu271314: I'm have a HP PRIME GRAPHING CALCULATOR, with same Software Version and run OK. Try ...In the Statistic 1Var, write your data, p.e.D1 D2 D312 9 936 9 9 2 9 6Now, for copy you must, select with More, the option 3Select and 3BoxIn Choose Prog Function, select Row's and Column, as ...Row: 1 Column: 1Row: 3 Column: 3Press Ok. Now with arrow, select the box and press Shift+CopyNow, with Esc, select Apps, Statistics 2Var and StartIn C1, put block and press Shift+Paste ... 1{{12,9,9},{36,9,9},{ > Press Ok and 1 Grid data Note: You can see, with examples, from ... www-fourier.ujf-grenoble.fr/~parisse/calc/hprime.pdf
-
Hello, we currently run NAC for our wired (OOB), wireless (IB) and VPN (IB) enviroments. We are looking at migrating over to ISE for our wireless enviroment as a first step, with follow-up projects to move the VPN and wired clients over. I have been reading that ISE will still use the NAC agent. Our current NAC enviroment is at 4.7.2 and we are running the 4.7.2.10 agent. We do not want to upgrade this enviroment, we would rather focus on migrating to ISE. So our thought was to upgrade the clients to the latest NAC agent version 4.9.1.5. This agent is supported against the 4.7.2 NAC Manager. The problem is, I do not see this agent version listed as supported in the ISE compatibility matrix. Instead, they list a NAC agent of 4.9.0.37, which ironically, is NOT listed in the NAC compatiblity matrix. So what version of NAC agent should we run in a mixed enviroment? I am hoping 4.9.1.5 is supported against ISE, and the matrix is simply not updated yet. Thank you in advance for your help.
Not sure I understand. The 4.9.1.5 NAC agent does run against our CAM, as we have tested that and it is listed in the support matrix. So if we upgrade our NAC applainces, we would still run that agent. Does that agent tun against ISE, and if not, what is Cisco's recommendation to bring ISE into the enviroment? We have to have a migration path, and wireless seemed like a logical first step. But we need a NAC agent that will work against Clean Access AND ISE as our laptops will be wireless and wired at different times. Which Agent would be recommended?
-
Hello
We are in the process of evaluating the Cisco ISE VMWare appliance with a view to replace our existing FreeRADIUS installation as authentication provider for our wireless network and VPN service. As a part of this we are hoping to migrate our user authentication to Microsoft Active Directory - we have previously authenticated against a different identity store (not MS AD). Because of this legacy our Windows domain is not the same as our RADIUS realm name - the Windows domain is "win.mydomain" whereas we wish to allow users to authenticate using "username@mydomain" or even "[email protected]" as they are doing today. We are experiencing an issue where authentication requests with the format "[email protected]" will be forwarded to the Windows AD whereas authentication requests with the format "username@mydomain" will fail with the log message "User not found in Active Directory". We do not know if the ISE itself is validating the username and triggering this error, or if the error originates from AD. We suspect the that the ISE is not even asking AD because "win.mydomain" is the domain configured in "Active Directory" in "External Identity Sources".
Authentication requests against the AD without a realm are successful (that is, using only "username"). With this in mind we located a post on the Cisco support forums that described a process of proxying the request back to the ISE and strip the realm information, but this was specific for the ACS platform. We have attempted to implement this solution but it is still not working as we would have hoped, and we are not entirely certain where the fault might lie. We are currently using PEAP with MSCHAPv2 for authentication in our WLAN where the main problem is. We suspect that the "proxy-to-self" with realm stripping is an issue with PEAP.
Is there a supported method of achieving our goal, or should we abandon the ISE platform as our scenario is simply not supported?Seems like your issue maybe related to DNS, when ISE receives the format [email protected], the dns request is failing. However, there is a setting for alternate UPN Suffixes that can be configured to include domain.com and student.domain.com.
Here is a windows article that should fix this for you. Once you get this updated please reboot ISE so it rejoins AD. Try your tests again.
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc772007.aspx
Thanks,
Tarik Admani
*Please rate helpful posts* -
ISE and Citrix Netscaler for LB
I'm working on a solution where we have NetScaler load balancers distributing radius requests from the NADs to respectvie PSNs. Authentication works and redirect URLs work etc.. The challenge we're having is with EAP-TLS sessions. The user get's a provisioned certificate and chain that checks out on the endpoint fine. When the user tries to connect with the device we see EAP timeouts from the ISE session to the supplicant. Each PSN has the internal identity cert configured for EAP authentication that has been configured from the same internal CA within the customers PKI.
Has anyone configured a NetScaler for use with ISE and besides the general guidlines below are there more specific things that need to be done to make this work with Citrix NetScalers?
Load Balancing guidelines.
No NAT.
Each PSN must be reachable by the PAN / MNT directly, without having to go through NAT (Routed mode LB, not NAT).
Each PSN must also be reachable directly from the client network for redirections (CWA, Posture, etc…)
Perform sticky (aka: persistence) based on Calling-Station-ID and Framed-IP-address
Session-ID is recommended if load balancer is capable (ACE is not).
VIP for PSNs gets listed as the RADIUS server on each NAD for all RADIUS AAA.
Each PSN gets listed individually in the NAD CoA list by real IP address (not VIP).
If ”Server NAT" the PSN-initiated CoA traffic, then can list single VIP in NAD CoA list.
Load Balancers get listed as NADs in ISE so their test authentications may be answered.
ISE uses the Layer 3 address to identify the NAD, not the NAS-IP-Address in the RADIUS packet. This is a primary reason to avoid Source NAT (SNAT) for traffic sent to VIP.Does anyone have a working configuration for this? I'm getting successful authentications from the supplicant, but CoA fails. When I perform a CoA I get two of each of the following messages:
1) Event & Failure reason "5436 RADIUS packet already in the process"
then
2) Event "5417 Dynamic Authorization failed" / Failure reason "11215 No response has been received from Dynamic Authorization Client in ISE"
The policy nodes are not physically located behind the NetScaler, so I have them pointing to the NetScaler as the default GW. I'm not sure if we have the policy on the NS configured correctly though, because I had to add the NetScaler as a Network Device and I was under the impression that the switch and PSN should continue to talk directly to each other.
Any help would be greatly appreciated!
Cheers!
Ken -
Ise and windows CA cert issues during tls
Hi All,
We are having some issues when doing eap-tls during onboarding. The setup is to have a single ssid network. Clients initially gets connected via peap and after onboarding it is eap-tls. The environment is a 2 tier CA hirearchy having a root-ca (offline) and intermediate CA (this is the AD domain enterprise CA and scep server). ISE cert was signed by the intermediate CA for https and eap. Also imported the certificate chain from the intermediate CA to ISE cert store (converted from .p7b to .der). It also has the scep RA certificate and scep communication between ise and scep server looks ok.
The issue is during the onboarding process (tested with windows xp) after the redirection to guest poral, windows SPW wizard starts and prompts to confirm the user certificate. This keeps on prompting after 'ok' is clicked and does not proceed further. The 'view certificate' shows the following error " The issuer of this ccertficate is not found". ISE shows the following errors in authentication details (jpg attached). Windows SPW logs shows that it keep on retrying authentication.
The issuer of the client cert which is the intermediate CA cert is already in the ISE certificate store. Therefore shouldn't that client get this issuer CA details from ISE and ISE should be able to authenticate client during onboarding to start the tls connection? Do we have to import seperate certs for root-ca, Intermediate ca in ise store instead of the chain?
Does anybody had this issue with ISE in a hirearchical CA environment?
Thanks in advance.Review this link
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/ise/1.0/user_guide/ise10_troubleshooting.html#wp1044440 -
Hi,
Does anyone know if node groups are purely for policy server nodes behind a load balancer such as ACE. If you have a pair of policy server nodes at a site with no load balancer, and both nodes configured in all NAS's can these be in a node group.
Does anyone know if you can use a load balanced set of policy nodes with LWA and WLC. There has to be affinity between the portal ISE and the AAA ISE configured in the WLC, these would be two different sessions one Radius and one HTTP, so the ACE would not be able to distinguish.
Thanks.
GaryHi Pon -
Do you mean groups of users or group of pages?
If you mean groups of users, you can create your sub-groups as a regular groups, and then when assigning users to your Main Finance group ... add the 2 groups which are your subGroups.
If you are talking about the Portal Page Group structure, you cannot nest page groups, but you can create pages and subpages.
Hope this helps,
Candace -
ISE and 802.1x - Retrieve User Cert from AD for Auth without it being in the Personal Store?
Hello,
We are implementing 802.1x EAP-TLS wired at the moment with Cisco ISE, and wireless is to come after that, along with our internal PKI. I set up the PKI, and our network engineer is setting up the ISE. We currently have it set to first authenticate the computers with a computer certificate (allowing access to AD, among some other things), and then further authenticate the users with user certificates.
I don't have much knowledge of Cisco ISE, and plan to learn as we go, but I'm wondering:
Is it possible to authenticate the computer via the computer certificate, getting access to AD, and then have the ISE check AD for the User certificate INSTEAD of the User certificate being in the local Personal store of the client computer? We have autoenrollment going for user certificates, but it seems to be cumbersome (in thought) that once 802.1x is enabled, a new computer/employee coming on the network has to first go to an unauthenticated port to be able to download the User certificate in the Personal store, before then being able to use an 802.1x port?
I guess that makes two questions:
1) Can ISE pull the user cert from AD, without needing it in the local Personal store?
2) What's the easiest way to handle new computers/users that don't already have the User cert in their local Personal store once 802.1x is enabled?1)No
2)Use EAP-Chaining with EAP-TLS and PEAP
For this scenario, i would go with Cisco AnyConnect NAM, and then use EAP-Chaining, with EAP-TLS for machine auth, and then PEAP for user authentication. This way you can make sure that both the machine and the user is authenticated, and more importantly, that a user can not get on the network with their user identity only and no machine identity. Using windows own supplicant for this, gives no garantee that the user has logged in from an authenticated machine. The feature that used to be used for this before EAP-Chaining was introduced, is called MAR, and has many problems, making it almost useless in a corporate environment. Security wise, the PEAP-MSCHAPV2 is tunneled in EAP-FAST and does not have the same security issues as regular PEAP. -
Is ASA integration with ISE and RSA for 2 factor authentication a valid/tested design
Hi,
Customer currently uses ASA to directly integrate with RSA kind of solution to provide 2 factor authentication mechanism for VPN user access. We're considering to introduce ISE to this picture, and to offload posture analysis from ASA to ISE. And the flow we're thinking is to have ASA interface to ISE and ISE interface to RSA and AD backend infrastructure. And we still need the 2 factor authentication to work, i.e., customer gets a SMS code in addition to its login username and password. I'm wondering if ASA/ISE/RSA/AD integrated solution (and with 2 factor authentication to work) is a tested solution or Cisco validate design? Any potential issue may break the flow?
Thanks in advance for any input!
TinaHi,
I have an update for this quite broad question.
I have now came a bit further on the path.
Now the needed Radius Access Attribute are available in ISE after adding them in
"Policy Elements" -> "Dictionaris" -> "System" -> "Radius" -> "Cisco-VPN3000".
I added both the attribute 146 Tunnel-Group-Name which I realy need to achive what I want(select diffrent OTP-backends depending on Tunnel Group in ASA) and the other new attribute 150 Client-Type which could be intresting to look at as well.
Here the "Diagnostics Tools" -> "Generel tools" -> "TCP Dump" and Wireshare helped me understand how this worked.
With that I could really see the attributes in the radius access requests going in to the ASA.
Now looking at a request in "Radius Authentication details" I have
Other Attributes:
ConfigVersionId=29,Device Port=1025,DestinationPort=1812,RadiusPacketType=AccessRequest,Protocol=Radius,CVPN3000/ASA/PIX7.x-Tunnel-Group-Name=SMHI-TG-RA-ISESMS,CVPN3000/ASA/PIX7.x-Client-Type=,CPMSessionID=ac100865000006294FD60A7F,.....
Ok, the tunnel group name attribute seems to be understood correct, but Client-Type just say =, no value for that.
That is strange, I must have defined that wrong(?), but lets leave that for now, I do not really need it for the moment being.
So now when I have this Tunnel-Group-Name attribute available I want to use it in my Rule-Based Authentication Policy.
Problem now is that as soon as I in an expression add a criteria containing Cisco-VPN3000:CVPN3000/ASA/PIX7.x-Tunnel-Group-Name matches .* (just anything), then that row does not match any more. It still work matching against NAS-IP and other attributes.
What could it be I have missed?
Best regards
/Mattias -
CWA using ISE and mobility anchor
My team is trying to demo wireless guest access using CWA with an ISE server. We appear to be hitting an issue when combining this with mobility anchoring.
When we don't use a mobility anchor the authentication goes off without a hitch seemingly proving that the ISE configuration is sound. The test laptop associates and gets redirected, auths, moves to the RUN state and access to the network is granted.
When the mobility anchor is enabled, the test laptop does get redirected, authentication is successful, but the process does not fully complete, as on the foreign controller the user is in RUN state whereas on the anchor the user is still stuck at CWA required.
Now, I've read the L2 auth occurs between the foreign controller and ISE, and the L3 auth occurs between the anchor controller and ISE, but this does not appear to borne out in packet captures of the process where both parts of the auth seems to go to and from the foreign controller and ISE.
I'm curious to know if anyone else has come across this issue, or has ideas where I should be looking in the config or debugs to find the root cause.
When setting up the controllers and ISE this guide (linked below) was used and the controllers are 2504 controllers on 7.5 series software and ISE is on the latest 1.2 patches:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps11640/products_configuration_example09186a0080bead09.shtml
To me it seems to be mobility related, but the authentication flow does seem to be off compared with what the guide says.FOREIGN
*apfMsConnTask_4: Jan 28 23:04:59.525: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 Adding mobile on LWAPP AP 0c:d9:96:ba:7d:20(1)
*apfMsConnTask_4: Jan 28 23:04:59.525: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 Association received from mobile on BSSID 0c:d9:96:ba:7d:2f
*apfMsConnTask_4: Jan 28 23:04:59.525: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 Global 200 Clients are allowed to AP radio
*apfMsConnTask_4: Jan 28 23:04:59.525: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 Max Client Trap Threshold: 0 cur: 0
*apfMsConnTask_4: Jan 28 23:04:59.525: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 Rf profile 600 Clients are allowed to AP wlan
*apfMsConnTask_4: Jan 28 23:04:59.525: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 Applying Interface policy on Mobile, role Unassociated. Ms NAC State 0 Quarantine Vlan 0 Access Vlan 0
*apfMsConnTask_4: Jan 28 23:04:59.525: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 Re-applying interface policy for client
*apfMsConnTask_4: Jan 28 23:04:59.525: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 0.0.0.0 START (0) Changing IPv4 ACL 'none' (ACL ID 255) ===> 'none' (ACL ID 255) --- (caller apf_policy.c:2164)
*apfMsConnTask_4: Jan 28 23:04:59.525: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 0.0.0.0 START (0) Changing IPv6 ACL 'none' (ACL ID 255) ===> 'none' (ACL ID 255) --- (caller apf_policy.c:2185)
*apfMsConnTask_4: Jan 28 23:04:59.526: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 apfApplyWlanPolicy: Retaining the ACL recieved in AAA attributes 255 on mobile
*apfMsConnTask_4: Jan 28 23:04:59.526: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 apfApplyWlanPolicy: Apply WLAN Policy over PMIPv6 Client Mobility Type
*apfMsConnTask_4: Jan 28 23:04:59.526: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 In processSsidIE:4565 setting Central switched to TRUE
*apfMsConnTask_4: Jan 28 23:04:59.526: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 In processSsidIE:4568 apVapId = 1 and Split Acl Id = 65535
*apfMsConnTask_4: Jan 28 23:04:59.526: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 Applying site-specific Local Bridging override for station 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 - vapId 1, site 'AP-Group-CHEC.default', interface 'management'
*apfMsConnTask_4: Jan 28 23:04:59.526: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 Applying Local Bridging Interface Policy for station 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 - vlan 84, interface id 0, interface 'management'
*apfMsConnTask_4: Jan 28 23:04:59.526: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 processSsidIE statusCode is 0 and status is 0
*apfMsConnTask_4: Jan 28 23:04:59.526: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 processSsidIE ssid_done_flag is 0 finish_flag is 0
*apfMsConnTask_4: Jan 28 23:04:59.526: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 STA - rates (8): 140 18 152 36 176 72 96 108 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
*apfMsConnTask_4: Jan 28 23:04:59.526: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 suppRates statusCode is 0 and gotSuppRatesElement is 1
*apfMsConnTask_4: Jan 28 23:04:59.526: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 apfProcessAssocReq (apf_80211.c:7830) Changing state for mobile 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 on AP 0c:d9:96:ba:7d:20 from Idle to AAA Pending
*apfMsConnTask_4: Jan 28 23:04:59.526: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 Scheduling deletion of Mobile Station: (callerId: 20) in 10 seconds
*radiusTransportThread: Jan 28 23:04:59.550: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 Username entry (00-1E-C2-C0-96-05) created for mobile, length = 253
*radiusTransportThread: Jan 28 23:04:59.550: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 Username entry (00-1E-C2-C0-96-05) created in mscb for mobile, length = 253
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:04:59.550: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 Received SGT for this Client.
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:04:59.550: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 Redirect URL received for client from RADIUS. Client will be moved to WebAuth_Reqd state to facilitate redirection. Skip web-auth Flag = 0
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:04:59.550: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 Resetting web IPv4 acl from 255 to 255
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:04:59.550: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 Resetting web IPv4 Flex acl from 65535 to 65535
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:04:59.550: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 Applying Interface policy on Mobile, role Unassociated. Ms NAC State 2 Quarantine Vlan 0 Access Vlan 84
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:04:59.550: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 Re-applying interface policy for client
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:04:59.550: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 0.0.0.0 START (0) Changing IPv4 ACL 'none' (ACL ID 255) ===> 'none' (ACL ID 255) --- (caller apf_policy.c:2164)
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:04:59.550: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 0.0.0.0 START (0) Changing IPv6 ACL 'none' (ACL ID 255) ===> 'none' (ACL ID 255) --- (caller apf_policy.c:2185)
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:04:59.550: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 apfApplyWlanPolicy: Retaining the ACL recieved in AAA attributes 0 on mobile
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:04:59.551: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 apfApplyWlanPolicy: Apply WLAN Policy over PMIPv6 Client Mobility Type
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:04:59.551: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 Inserting AAA Override struct for mobile
MAC: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05, source 2
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:04:59.551: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 0.0.0.0 START (0) Initializing policy
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:04:59.551: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 0.0.0.0 START (0) Change state to AUTHCHECK (2) last state START (0)
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:04:59.551: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 0.0.0.0 AUTHCHECK (2) Change state to L2AUTHCOMPLETE (4) last state AUTHCHECK (2)
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:04:59.551: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 Not Using WMM Compliance code qosCap 00
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:04:59.551: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 0.0.0.0 L2AUTHCOMPLETE (4) Plumbed mobile LWAPP rule on AP 0c:d9:96:ba:7d:20 vapId 1 apVapId 1 flex-acl-name:
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:04:59.551: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 0.0.0.0 L2AUTHCOMPLETE (4) Change state to DHCP_REQD (7) last state L2AUTHCOMPLETE (4)
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:04:59.551: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 apfMsAssoStateInc
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:04:59.551: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 apfPemAddUser2 (apf_policy.c:333) Changing state for mobile 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 on AP 0c:d9:96:ba:7d:20 from AAA Pending to Associated
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:04:59.551: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 apfPemAddUser2:session timeout forstation 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 - Session Tout 1800, apfMsTimeOut '1800' and sessionTimerRunning flag is 0
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:04:59.551: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 Scheduling deletion of Mobile Station: (callerId: 49) in 1800 seconds
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:04:59.551: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 Func: apfPemAddUser2, Ms Timeout = 1800, Session Timeout = 1800
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:04:59.551: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 Sending Assoc Response to station on BSSID 0c:d9:96:ba:7d:2f (status 0) ApVapId 1 Slot 1
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:04:59.551: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 apfProcessRadiusAssocResp (apf_80211.c:3066) Changing state for mobile 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 on AP 0c:d9:96:ba:7d:20 from Associated to Associated
*DHCP Socket Task: Jan 28 23:04:59.567: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 DHCP received op BOOTREQUEST (1) (len 308,vlan 84, port 13, encap 0xec03)
*DHCP Socket Task: Jan 28 23:04:59.567: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 DHCP (encap type 0xec03) mstype 0ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
*DHCP Socket Task: Jan 28 23:04:59.567: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 DHCP dropping packet due to ongoing mobility handshake exchange, (siaddr 0.0.0.0, mobility state = 'apfMsMmQueryRequested'
*DHCP Socket Task: Jan 28 23:05:01.523: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 DHCP received op BOOTREQUEST (1) (len 308,vlan 84, port 13, encap 0xec03)
*DHCP Socket Task: Jan 28 23:05:01.523: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 DHCP (encap type 0xec03) mstype 0ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
*DHCP Socket Task: Jan 28 23:05:01.523: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 DHCP dropping packet due to ongoing mobility handshake exchange, (siaddr 0.0.0.0, mobility state = 'apfMsMmQueryRequested'
*mmMaListen: Jan 28 23:05:02.362: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 0.0.0.0 DHCP_REQD (7) State Update from Mobility-Incomplete to Mobility-Complete, mobility role=ExpForeign, client state=APF_MS_STATE_ASSOCIATED
*mmMaListen: Jan 28 23:05:02.362: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 apfMsRunStateInc
*mmMaListen: Jan 28 23:05:02.362: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 0.0.0.0 DHCP_REQD (7) Change state to RUN (20) last state DHCP_REQD (7)
*mmMaListen: Jan 28 23:05:02.362: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 0.0.0.0 RUN (20) Reached PLUMBFASTPATH: from line 5793
*mmMaListen: Jan 28 23:05:02.362: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 0.0.0.0 RUN (20) Adding Fast Path rule
type = Airespace AP Client
on AP 0c:d9:96:ba:7d:20, slot 1, interface = 13, QOS = 0
IPv4 ACL ID = 255, IPv6 ACL ID = 255,
*mmMaListen: Jan 28 23:05:02.362: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 0.0.0.0 RUN (20) Fast Path rule (contd...) 802.1P = 0, DSCP = 0, TokenID = 15206 Local Bridging Vlan = 84, Local Bridging intf id = 0
*mmMaListen: Jan 28 23:05:02.363: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 0.0.0.0 RUN (20) Successfully plumbed mobile rule (IPv4 ACL ID 255, IPv6 ACL ID 255, L2 ACL ID 255)
*pemReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:05:02.364: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 Set bi-dir guest tunnel for 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 as in Export Foreign role
*pemReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:05:02.364: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 0.0.0.0 Added NPU entry of type 1, dtlFlags 0x4
*pemReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:05:02.364: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 Skip Foreign / Export Foreign Client IP 0.0.0.0 plumbing in FP SCB
*DHCP Socket Task: Jan 28 23:05:03.869: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 DHCP received op BOOTREQUEST (1) (len 308,vlan 84, port 13, encap 0xec03)
*DHCP Socket Task: Jan 28 23:05:03.869: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 DHCP (encap type 0xec03) mstype 0ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
*DHCP Socket Task: Jan 28 23:05:03.869: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 DHCP processing DHCP REQUEST (3)
*DHCP Socket Task: Jan 28 23:05:03.869: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 DHCP op: BOOTREQUEST, htype: Ethernet, hlen: 6, hops: 0
*DHCP Socket Task: Jan 28 23:05:03.869: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 DHCP xid: 0xafea6bc9 (2951375817), secs: 5, flags: 0
*DHCP Socket Task: Jan 28 23:05:03.869: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 DHCP chaddr: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05
*DHCP Socket Task: Jan 28 23:05:03.869: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 DHCP ciaddr: 0.0.0.0, yiaddr: 0.0.0.0
*DHCP Socket Task: Jan 28 23:05:03.869: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 DHCP siaddr: 0.0.0.0, giaddr: 0.0.0.0
*DHCP Socket Task: Jan 28 23:05:03.869: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 DHCP requested ip: 10.130.98.8
*DHCP Socket Task: Jan 28 23:05:03.887: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 DHCP received op BOOTREPLY (2) (len 320,vlan 84, port 13, encap 0xec07)
*DHCP Socket Task: Jan 28 23:05:03.887: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 DHCP processing DHCP ACK (5)
*DHCP Socket Task: Jan 28 23:05:03.887: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 DHCP op: BOOTREPLY, htype: Ethernet, hlen: 6, hops: 0
*DHCP Socket Task: Jan 28 23:05:03.887: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 DHCP xid: 0xafea6bc9 (2951375817), secs: 0, flags: 0
*DHCP Socket Task: Jan 28 23:05:03.887: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 DHCP chaddr: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05
*DHCP Socket Task: Jan 28 23:05:03.887: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 DHCP ciaddr: 0.0.0.0, yiaddr: 10.130.98.8
*DHCP Socket Task: Jan 28 23:05:03.887: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 DHCP siaddr: 10.30.4.173, giaddr: 0.0.0.0
*DHCP Socket Task: Jan 28 23:05:03.887: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 DHCP server id: 1.1.1.2 rcvd server id: 1.1.1.2
*DHCP Socket Task: Jan 28 23:05:03.887: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 10.130.98.8 RUN (20) DHCP Address Re-established
*DHCP Socket Task: Jan 28 23:05:03.887: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 10.130.98.8 RUN (20) Reached PLUMBFASTPATH: from line 6978
*DHCP Socket Task: Jan 28 23:05:03.887: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 10.130.98.8 RUN (20) Replacing Fast Path rule
type = Airespace AP Client
on AP 0c:d9:96:ba:7d:20, slot 1, interface = 13, QOS = 0
IPv4 ACL ID = 255, IPv6 ACL ID
*DHCP Socket Task: Jan 28 23:05:03.887: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 10.130.98.8 RUN (20) Fast Path rule (contd...) 802.1P = 0, DSCP = 0, TokenID = 15206 Local Bridging Vlan = 84, Local Bridging intf id = 0
*DHCP Socket Task: Jan 28 23:05:03.888: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 10.130.98.8 RUN (20) Successfully plumbed mobile rule (IPv4 ACL ID 255, IPv6 ACL ID 255, L2 ACL ID 255)
*DHCP Socket Task: Jan 28 23:05:03.888: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 Assigning Address 10.130.98.8 to mobile
*DHCP Socket Task: Jan 28 23:05:03.888: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 DHCP success event for client. Clearing dhcp failure count for interface management.
*DHCP Socket Task: Jan 28 23:05:03.888: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 DHCP success event for client. Clearing dhcp failure count for interface management.
*DHCP Socket Task: Jan 28 23:05:03.888: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 DHCP successfully bridged packet to STA
*pemReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:05:03.889: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 Set bi-dir guest tunnel for 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 as in Export Foreign role
*pemReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:05:03.889: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 10.130.98.8 Added NPU entry of type 1, dtlFlags 0x4
*pemReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:05:03.890: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 Skip Foreign / Export Foreign Client IP 10.130.98.8 plumbing in FP SCB
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:05:18.716: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 Received SGT for this Client.
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:05:18.716: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 Resetting web IPv4 acl from 0 to 255
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:05:18.716: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 Resetting web IPv4 Flex acl from 65535 to 65535
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:05:18.716: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 AAA redirect is NULL. Skipping Web-auth for Radius NAC enabled WLAN.
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:05:18.716: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 apfApplyWlanPolicy: Retaining the ACL recieved in AAA attributes 255 on mobile
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:05:18.716: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 apfApplyWlanPolicy: Apply WLAN Policy over PMIPv6 Client Mobility Type
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:05:18.716: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 Inserting AAA Override struct for mobile
MAC: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05, source 2
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:05:18.717: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 Setting session timeout 3600 on mobile 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:05:18.717: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 Session Timeout is 3600 - starting session timer for the mobile
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:05:18.717: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 Applying cached RADIUS Override values for mobile 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 (caller pem_api.c:2307)
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:05:18.717: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 Setting session timeout 3600 on mobile 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:05:18.717: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 Session Timeout is 3600 - starting session timer for the mobile
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:05:18.717: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 10.130.98.8 RUN (20) Applied RADIUS override policy
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:05:18.717: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 10.130.98.8 RUN (20) Replacing Fast Path rule
type = Airespace AP Client
on AP 0c:d9:96:ba:7d:20, slot 1, interface = 13, QOS = 0
IPv4 ACL ID = 255, IPv6 ACL ID
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:05:18.717: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 10.130.98.8 RUN (20) Fast Path rule (contd...) 802.1P = 0, DSCP = 0, TokenID = 15206 Local Bridging Vlan = 84, Local Bridging intf id = 0
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:05:18.717: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 10.130.98.8 RUN (20) Successfully plumbed mobile rule (IPv4 ACL ID 255, IPv6 ACL ID 255, L2 ACL ID 255)
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:05:18.717: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 Not Using WMM Compliance code qosCap 00
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:05:18.717: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 10.130.98.8 RUN (20) Plumbed mobile LWAPP rule on AP 0c:d9:96:ba:7d:20 vapId 1 apVapId 1 flex-acl-name:
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:05:18.717: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 10.130.98.8 RUN (20) Change state to RUN (20) last state RUN (20)
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:05:18.717: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 apfMsAssoStateInc
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:05:18.717: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 apfPemAddUser2 (apf_policy.c:333) Changing state for mobile 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 on AP 0c:d9:96:ba:7d:20 from AAA Pending to Associated
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:05:18.717: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 apfPemAddUser2:session timeout forstation 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 - Session Tout 3600, apfMsTimeOut '1800' and sessionTimerRunning flag is 1
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:05:18.717: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 Scheduling deletion of Mobile Station: (callerId: 49) in 3600 seconds
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:05:18.717: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 Func: apfPemAddUser2, Ms Timeout = 1800, Session Timeout = 3600
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:05:18.718: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 Sending Assoc Response to station on BSSID 0c:d9:96:ba:7d:2f (status 0) ApVapId 1 Slot 1
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:05:18.718: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 apfProcessRadiusAssocResp (apf_80211.c:3066) Changing state for mobile 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 on AP 0c:d9:96:ba:7d:20 from Associated to Associated
*pemReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:05:18.720: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 Set bi-dir guest tunnel for 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 as in Export Foreign role
*pemReceiveTask: Jan 28 23:05:18.720: 00:1e:c2:c0:96:05 10.130.98.8 Added NPU entry of type 1, dtlFlags 0x4 -
ISE and WLC for CWA (Central Web Auth)
Hello All,
As we know that WLC (i.e. 5508) does not support MAB (MAC Auth Bypass) and it supports CWA in 7.2.x.
CWA is a result of successfull MAB. So how CWA work for wireless? So it means WLC support MAB?I've been playing around with this and have it working on 7.3.101 on the WLC 5508, however, I don't seem to be receiving the web redirect correctly. When I look under the client connections on the WLC I see that the URL is received on the WLC from ISE, but it appears to be truncated, unless that's just a limitation of the display. I see hits on the ACL-WEBAUTH-REDIRECT ACL on the controller, but it doesn't seem to be redirecting. I have this similar configuration on the wired side of the house and it works fine. ISE just shows pending webauth, as it should.
Security Policy Completed No
Policy Type N/A
Encryption Cipher None
EAP Type N/A
SNMP NAC State Access
Radius NAC State CENTRAL_WEB_AUTH
CTS Security Group Tag Not Applicable
AAA Override ACL Name ACL-WEBAUTH-REDIRECT
AAA Override ACL Applied Status Yes
AAA Override Flex ACL none
AAA Override Flex ACL Applied Status Unavailable
Redirect URL
https://.com:8443/guestportal/gateway
IPV4 ACL Name none
IPv4 ACL Applied Status Unavailable
IPv6 ACL Name none
IPv6 ACL Applied Status Unavailable
Maybe you are looking for
-
After upgrading one of our PCs to Windows 8, not all of the bookmarks were in FireFox upon opening the browser for the first time after the upgrade. Only A-C were brought in. We've tried several methods of getting the rest back into the browser with
-
How do you play mine craft on a mac with 2 screens fullscreen
how do you play mine craft on a mac with 2 screens fullscreen i play mine craft and i have a mac pro with 2 screens and i want to know how to play mine craft with both screens
-
How to parse xml file to read the tags
Hi All, I am having a requirement to read the tags from the xml file(xml parsing). The main issue is *xml file is stored in the table with xml type column* (not placed directly in the server) and we have to read the tags from that xml file. Please he
-
How to hide "Create Requisition Request" link in MSS
Hi All How to hide "Create Requisition Request" link which is in Recruiting services in MSS? Rgrds Sri
-
I have a LaCie DVD burner which I successfully use with iDVD and have had no problems. Today I have added a 250GB LaCie 250GB hard disk for extra video editing space. I have edited and successfully saved a trial project on to the new disc. When I fir