Does my boolean logic make sense?

Hello. I am currently working on a linked list assignment, but for some reason my boolean doesn't seem to do what I want it to do. can someone take a look to see why I am getting a black screen?
public boolean addEmployee(Employee newEmployee) //if there is fresh meat coming, returns true. I think something's wrong here
      EmployeeNode previous = search(newEmployee);
      EmployeeNode present= setPresent(previous);
      EmployeeNode add = new EmployeeNode();
          boolean freshMeat = false;
          add.data = new Employee(newEmployee);
          while((present!=null)&&(present.data.compareTo(newEmployee)<0))
          {     previous = present;
               add.link = present;
               present = add;
                System.out.println("present is: "+present.data);
                System.out.println("previous is: "+previous.data);
               freshMeat = true;
          return freshMeat;
   }if I remove the while loop and the condition, it will display everything that I am adding to it:
public boolean addEmployee(Employee newEmployee) //if there is fresh meat coming, returns true. I think something's wrong here
      EmployeeNode previous = search(newEmployee);
      EmployeeNode present= setPresent(previous);
      EmployeeNode add = new EmployeeNode();
          boolean freshMeat = false;
          add.data = new Employee(newEmployee);
          previous = present;
          add.link = present;
          present = add;
          System.out.println("present is:" + present.data);
          freshMeat = true;
          return freshMeat;
   }why can't I have my previous.data display if i type it into SOPLN?

I did a couple of linkedlist assignments not long ago, of which one is employee related.
I thought that the method names are a bit ambigous to me, and it will definitely help if you can outline your algo.
Putting your while condition to words, i have, if (current node exists) AND (newEmployee is "bigger" than the employee data in the current node) perform loop content. I am not sure if that is what you want.
Furthermore, I am not sure if you are traversing forward or backward, or if you are traversing your list at all in your while loop.
if your add.link refers to to next node in the list, shouldn't you do something like
previous = present;
present = add.link;
....again, it will greatly help if you are provide more info on what exactly are you trying to do.

Similar Messages

  • Does a singleton thread make sense?

    I'm new to developing with threads and the project I'm on has some Thread classes that are implemented as singletons.
    Does this make sense to do? It seems like from what I'm seeing (since thread.stop() is deprecated) that we should start a thread going and just let it finish. When I tried working with this thread, it would never finish since it was holding one to an instance of itself. (thread.isAlive() always returned true even after the run() method finished)
    Another developer I work with suggested looking into ThreadGroup instead of using a singleton. Is this the proper way to ensure a limited number of threads are started?
    The reason we only want one of these threads running at once is because they are very processing intensive.
    Thanks!

    http://java.sun.com/javase/6/docs/api/java/util/concurrent/Executors.html

  • Does this VoIP strategy make sense?

    I have a VoIP gateway that is marking packets with DiffServ CS1 and CS2 levels. These packets first hit an internal router that has a GRE/IPSec transport mode tunnel to another router on the public Internet. The internal router uses its FastEthernet port to connect to a second in-house router that has a T1 connection to the Internet. In order to setup some QoS I would like do the following:
    1) On the internal router I am not going to setup any actual QoS policies but I want to use the "qos pre-classify" commands on the crypto map and the tunnel interface in order preserve the DCSP info on the IPSec encrypted packets that will be processed by the Internet router
    2) On the Internet router I will setup a policy that matches DCSP packets and assigns them to a LLQ using the "priority" command.
    Since the IPSec tunnel also carries non-VoIP traffic my objective here is to prioritize only IPSec packets that have voice. Non-voice IPSec and all other traffic will be treated in best-effort mode.
    Does my plan make sense?
    Thanks,
    Diego

    Since IOS 11.3T, the TOS bits of the IP header is copied automatically to the TOS bits of the GRE header. However, there was a problem. While the subsequent routers could use this info in the TOS field of the GRE header, the router doing this initial copying itself was unable to prioritize based on the TOS bits. The 'qos pre-classify' command solves this problem. With the command configured, the packets will be correctly classified and the qos policy applied on the headend router too.
    The information ultimately copied into the TOS bit of the new header, mirrors the TOS bit in the original header. Also, the TOS bit is copied regardless of the 'qos pre-classify' command.

  • JPA persistence tier / does two different layers make sense ?

    I'm building a little application to illustrate performance issues we are encountering in our production system.
    I will create a proof of concept a change we think it will resolve our problems. The change consist in building a specific lighter ejb layer with read only entities only with necessary attributes and relationships into to show data for selection and navigation into the application.
    Does make any sense to put all this new ejbs in a different persistence model the one that already exists ?
    What is the consequence to have two persistence model instead one for the project ?
    My preference is to build two different layers (and related persistence model) and I think it is a good idea to separate the persistence layer because they have two different use, one for showing data and for navigation, one as a really persistence layer.
    But i don't know what are the consequences ?

    Accessories
    Page 32
    " 一天到晚游泳的鱼"
    [email protected]
    我的个人网站:LabVIEW——北方客栈 http://www.labview365.com
    欢迎加入《LabVIEW编程思想》组——http://decibel.ni.com/content/groups/thinking-in-labview
    Attachments:
    DevDaysPerformance.ppt ‏1009 KB

  • Animation logic doesn't make sense....

    I know this probably should go to a suggestion/feature request or what not but A. I haven't been able to find the place for that and B. I felt like it'd make sense to see what others thought of this as well....
    Firstly....I'm learning flash right now and the animation in it is simply put...."backwards". Every other animation program I've touched made sense but here....its mind boggling. After effects, 3dsmax, maya, just about any other animation software you ALWAYS do the animation THEN place the keyframe.
    Why is this important? Because then if you move your object just to see how it would be placed elsewhere temporarily and don't like it, you don't have to undo...or if you moved it accidentally you don't have to try and move it back into place. It doesn't key unless you tell it to key. Unless there's some feature in flash I've not yet discovered that reverses this. The other reason is for the sake of conformity. Sure flash isn't the same as other animation programs but if ctrl+Z is undo universally why do you have to go and change it, just to be different?
    Thats not all. It doesn't make sense to have to push a button to edit multiple key frames. Why can't we just select them all and then edit, why add in a useless extra step to edit frames?
    Lastly and the most annoying part, is the fact that you need to add in 'blank' keyframes to see your animation play. How did this even make sense from inception? Every other animation program your object will always exist ad infinitum unless you make it disappear. Why force us to add keyframes just to see what we have so far...doesn't it make more sense to just push the play button and see it playing endlessly and then during output you set the amount of frames u want rendered? Even more mind boggling is the fact that if you have an element animated within its own timeline you cannot see that animation in the main stage unless you add blank keyframes? Whats the purpose of these blank keyframes? Its so far as I can see just a needless step that never should have been there.
    Well thats my rant.
    Again, I don't script, I'm still learning it, but I come from a heavy background of animation of after effects/fcp/premiere and 3d packages. They are all consistent with how animation works, but here it just seems like it wasn't very thought out.
    Maybe there are some reasons for the way its done for the sake of actionscript or some other reasons I'm not yet aware of. So forgive me if what I'm saying in actuality doesn't make sense. But if it does.....sure this would require what would most likely be a huge overhaul of flash's animation system, certainly not enough time to make it in for cs5....but at least as a future patch or in cs6 it would really make things more logical and flat out less complicated.
    Thanks for reading, comments/critiques are welcome.

    What is your problem?

  • How can I restore a single image from an aperture time machine backup, do I have to restore the entire library? that does not make sense

    I hope there has been found a more efficiant solution for this,  how can I restore a single image from an aperture time machine backup, I really hope I don't have to restore the entire library? that does not make sense
    any suggestions?

    Did you try browsing your backups in the Finder ?  That is, do not go and "Enter Time Machine".  Instead, navigate to your Time Machine backup via Finder and then manually go to the time period (by folder name) you are looking for ... when you find your Aperture library you can then "Show Package Contents" and find the Master you are looking for.

  • GW2012 move: Does it make sense to move users to a new PO?

    Moving from GW8 on OES-NW to GW2012 on OES11: Does it make sense to create new post office and move users?
    We have a medium size GroupWise 8 system with a single post office holding less than 600 user accounts, 128 resources and 77 distribution lists.
    Due to politics we also have a non-GroupWise external domain that contains a non-GroupWise external post office with a large number of "users".
    The post office is on the primary domain.
    3 secondary domains hold a GWIA and two web access agents.
    I've never been real clear where the external stuff exists...
    One of the web access gateways resides on an OES11 server.
    The other webaccess agent and the GWIA are on OES-NW servers.
    All reside in NSS volumes.
    Given the lack support for NSS volumes on Linux servers by most backup applications (including mine), I've pretty much determined that it makes sense to move my GW system to EXT3 volumes.
    Even if I change backup software and stick with NSS, and even though all my data is stored on SAN arrays, from what I've read on the forums and from Danita's books, it's preferable to copy your GW system files to a new NSS volume, as opposed to just re-attaching the OES-NW LUN to the new OES11 server.
    Point being, whatever I do will involve copying the entire system via dbcopy and at some point, will also involve shutting down the existing domain and PO for the last phase of the copying process.
    So..., I'm contemplating the following scenario:
    Create a new OES11 server with EXT3 volumes sufficient for holding my GroupWise system.
    Create new GroupWise 8 domain on the server.
    Promote the new domain to primary and upgrade this new domain to GroupWise 2012.
    Once the new domain is upgraded, create new GW2012 post office on new server/primary domain and migrate the users, resources and distribution lists to the new post office.
    In the past I've had an additional post office and had migrated a about 20-25 users to that post office.
    It wasn't a terrible process, and fortunately, I didn't run into any problems with the migration of those users.
    When I re-consolidated my system, moving them back was also problem free
    On the pro side:
    No downtime of entire system
    Relatively simple
    Any issues in the migration process would be user-specific and would not effect the entire system.
    On the con side:
    Process could take far longer, since you can't move a lot of users simultaneously.
    In addition, we have a small group of users with anywhere from 40,000 to 80,000 email in their account, so I'd have to factor that into haw many users I migrate at one time.
    The chance of running into a stalled migration, for whatever reason, is probably much higher than running into a problem with moving the domain and PO via dbcopy.
    The unknown factors for me and my level of experience:
    It's been a while since I've had multiple post offices, so I don't recall what changes the users might see with regard to distribution lists, web access or external email.

    Originally Posted by gathagan
    Moving from GW8 on OES-NW to GW2012 on OES11: Does it make sense to create new post office and move users?
    Is there any reason you think that warrants to do so?
    If the system is performing normally I'd opt to stick to upgrading the current setup as is.
    I'm also curious, are you intending to upgrade to 2014 after the 2012 upgrade?
    Originally Posted by gathagan
    The post office is on the primary domain.
    3 secondary domains hold a GWIA and two web access agents.
    I've never been real clear where the external stuff exists...
    Ok, that setup makes the upgrade easier. As you will start the upgrade with the primary holding the PO's... the PO's can be upgraded right after or during the domain upgrade (depending on if the MTA and POA are running on the same server).
    That means you don't have to think about upgraded webaccess/GWIA connectivity issues with a lower PO version.
    The external stuff are simply configurations found in the existing GroupWise domain databases. Or do you mean where those connected systems actually run?
    Originally Posted by gathagan
    One of the web access gateways resides on an OES11 server.
    The other webaccess agent and the GWIA are on OES-NW servers.
    All reside in NSS volumes.
    And the primary Domain and PO are also still on NetWare (version 6.5 SP8 I presume), correct?
    Originally Posted by gathagan
    Given the lack support for NSS volumes on Linux servers by most backup applications (including mine), I've pretty much determined that it makes sense to move my GW system to EXT3 volumes.
    Which backup application is that? With GroupWise op Linux not much NSS support is needed IMO.... as long as the files get backed up properly other metadata (rights, ownerships, etc) is irrelevant.
    As for EXT3 vs NSS, when dealing with OES I always choose NSS. But that's me.
    Another option could be to use XFS instead of ext3. That does perform much better, but has to be noted that it is more prone to file corruption in unexpected power loss situations.
    With ext3, watch out for the scheduled filesystem check cycles at boot, that is one thing I really dislike about ext3 as disabling that check completely is not recommended and it means at least once a year the system will take an extensive amount of time to complete a (re)boot due to the check running on the ext3 filesystem. That usually pops up on you when you are not counting on it and "just quickly" want to reboot the server in a patching routine or other.
    Originally Posted by gathagan
    Even if I change backup software and stick with NSS, and even though all my data is stored on SAN arrays, from what I've read on the forums and from Danita's books, it's preferable to copy your GW system files to a new NSS volume, as opposed to just re-attaching the OES-NW LUN to the new OES11 server.
    Yes, it's always good if you can start with a clean volume when transitioning from NetWare to OES.
    Depending on how long you can afford to have the system down during upgrade, you can also choose the route of moving the NetWare LUN to the new OES server. Adding a second new LUN to the OES server with the needed size and initializing it with a new NSS volume and then just simply do a volume to volume copy using the cp of rsync command. As it's on the same server that can go quite quickly within an acceptable maintenance window to complete all move/upgrade steps.
    Originally Posted by gathagan
    Point being, whatever I do will involve copying the entire system via dbcopy and at some point, will also involve shutting down the existing domain and PO for the last phase of the copying process.
    Sure, though you don't necessarily have to use dbcopy... depending on what you are planning to do. An offline copy won't require it for example.
    How much data are we talking about (in GB's)?
    Originally Posted by gathagan
    So..., I'm contemplating the following scenario:
    Create a new OES11 server with EXT3 volumes sufficient for holding my GroupWise system.
    Create new GroupWise 8 domain on the server.
    Promote the new domain to primary and upgrade this new domain to GroupWise 2012.
    Once the new domain is upgraded, create new GW2012 post office on new server/primary domain and migrate the users, resources and distribution lists to the new post office.
    If you really want to move users.... sure. I'd again opt for upgrading the existing system.
    Also, it's a good rule to have the PO's running the same GroupWise version and patchlevel before commencing user moves. Moves between PO's with a different GroupWise version can lead to issues.
    Originally Posted by gathagan
    In the past I've had an additional post office and had migrated a about 20-25 users to that post office.
    It wasn't a terrible process, and fortunately, I didn't run into any problems with the migration of those users.
    When I re-consolidated my system, moving them back was also problem free
    If you would want to move users, for whatever reason, I'd opt to first upgrade to the latest version first, then move. There have been many enhancements and bugfixes made in the move procedure over these last couple of years.
    Originally Posted by gathagan
    On the pro side:
    No downtime of entire system
    Relatively simple
    Any issues in the migration process would be user-specific and would not effect the entire system.
    On the con side:
    Process could take far longer, since you can't move a lot of users simultaneously.
    In addition, we have a small group of users with anywhere from 40,000 to 80,000 email in their account, so I'd have to factor that into haw many users I migrate at one time.
    The chance of running into a stalled migration, for whatever reason, is probably much higher than running into a problem with moving the domain and PO via dbcopy.
    I prefer a system upgrade over moving users. The process of moving when dealing with 100+ users, requires more effort and there are always things that need attention for a portion of the users. Also things like mobile devices can require some extra attention after having moved an account for example.
    True, problems during a system upgrade can potentially affect all users. That is a factor. From the many upgrades I've done that's rarely really been an issue and problems encountered during an upgrade did not cause too much delay. Just make sure you always have a good full backup handy so you can reverse the upgrade if ever needed.
    Originally Posted by gathagan
    The unknown factors for me and my level of experience:
    It's been a while since I've had multiple post offices, so I don't recall what changes the users might see with regard to distribution lists, web access or external email.
    If by this you are referring to user moves and address book visibility between PO's, that should not be different to what users are seeing now. At least, the default is that within a GroupWise system all is visible throughout the system. If you have specifically set GroupWise objects to Postoffice visibility... then that would be something to check.
    Cheers,
    Willem

  • Help.  Does use of .txt file make sense or code directly into an ArrayList

    I am writing my first program and I want to put a series of information in various .txt files. This is because I will have a lot of different objects that I will create that will needed to be iterated over (most of the objects are similar in many ways). It seemed to me that a .txt file would be better than writing the items directly in an arraylist (if you know what i mean). What do you think?
    There will be 7 different objects that will be iterated over (and there will be 12 other objects doing other things as well, they will not be in .txt format), and I thought instead of having to maintain it through the actual code, I would just have .txt files that I create in notepad or something so that when I need to make changes to one of the 7 objects I only have to get the .txt file instead of having to wade through the code to find that object.
    Does this make sense?
    It seems that I will now have to do a lot of I / O to make it work, so now I am thinking maybe it is better to simply use the arrylist. Is there a benefit of one over the other in this circumstance?
    Also one of the objects has jpeg files that will need to be iterated over. Actually for these I will put them in an array list, because I can't seem to figure out yet how to get an image and the information about the image to display within I/O (like CD covers and their titles).
    Thank you for any help and suggestions I feel a little overwhelmed, but hopeful, with you kind folks.
    Peace
    NB I know that I am not using the correct terminology, but I hope that you can understand what I mean.
    Message was edited by:
    peacerosetx

    I am writing my first program and I want to put a
    series of information in various .txt files. Thisis
    because I will have a lot of different objects thatI
    will create that will needed to be iterated over
    (most of the objects are similar in many ways). It
    seemed to me that a .txt file would be better than
    writing the items directly in an arraylist (if you
    know what i mean). What do you think? I think I do not know what you mean. I also think
    that ArrayLists and files shouldn't replace eachI am going to use an ArrayList. Merci
    other.
    There will be 7 different objects that will be
    iterated over (and there will be 12 other objects
    doing other things as well, they will not be in.txt
    format),Seven objects? Twelve objects? Huh? Why not use
    arrays? And how do you get an object into a text
    file?
    and I thought instead of having to maintain
    it through the actual code, I would just have .txt
    files that I create in notepad or something sothat
    when I need to make changes to one of the 7 objectsI
    only have to get the .txt file instead of havingto
    wade through the code to find that object.
    Does this make sense? Your description? Not to me.
    It seems that I will now have to do a lot of I / Oto
    make it work, so now I am thinking maybe it isbetter
    to simply use the arrylist. Is there a benefit of
    one over the other in this circumstance? Uh, ArrayList is way faster and much easier
    modifyable.
    Also one of the objects has jpeg files that willneed
    to be iterated over. Actually for these I will put
    them in an array list, because I can't seem tofigure
    out yet how to get an image and the informationabout
    the image to display within I/O (like CD coversand
    their titles). "Display within I/O"? This makes no sense.
    NB I know that I am not using the correct
    terminology, but I hope that you can understandwhat
    I mean.If you're not using the correct terminology, there's
    no chance for us to understand you. If you say
    "objects" but mean "classes", then say classes.

  • I need to work on documents in both my iMac and air book. But I have to download document and them upload it, and when I upload it I can't open it unless I open it on my phone first. Yet changes made on phone appear straight away. Does this make sense????

    I need to work on documents in both my iMac and air book. But I have to download document and them upload it, and when I upload it I can't open it unless I open it on my phone first. Yet changes made on phone appear straight away. Does this make sense????

    On your Macs open System Preferences > iCloud
    Deselect the box next to Documents & Data, then reselect that box then restart your Macs.
    On the iPhone tap Settings > iCloud. Switch Documents & Data off then back on then reset the iPhone.
    Hold the On/Off Sleep/Wake button and the Home button down at the same time for at least ten seconds, until the Apple logo appears.
    See if you can open the files now without opening on the iPhone first.

  • My ipod 5 wont connect to wifi, all the other devices in the house will does not make sense

    Ipod 5 wont conect to wifi in my house when other devices do. does not make sense, went to apple store connected no problem there. Funny thing is it has worked since christmas now all the sudden i have problems, any ideas?

    Does the iPod connect to other networks?
    Does the iPod see the network?
    Any error messages?
    Do other devices now connect?
    Did the iPod connect before?
    Try the following to rule out a software problem:                 
    - Reset the iOS device. Nothing will be lost
    Reset iOS device: Hold down the On/Off button and the Home button at the same time for at
    least ten seconds, until the Apple logo appears.
    - Power off and then back on the router
    - Reset network settings: Settings>General>Reset>Reset Network Settings
    - iOS: Troubleshooting Wi-Fi networks and connections
    - iOS: Recommended settings for Wi-Fi routers and access points
    - Restore from backup. See:
    iOS: How to back up
    - Restore to factory settings/new iOS device.
    If still problem make an appointment at the Genius Bar of an Apple store since it appears you have a hardware problem.
    Apple Retail Store - Genius Bar

  • Proxy to JMS Scenario: switch from sync to async proxy,does it makes sense?

    Hi @all,
    i've implemented a sync proxy to JMS scenario that works well. Backend is ECC 6.0 and Middleware is PI 7.1.
    Business Case: Run a request with a number and get a response back with a corresponding entry for the number. That means, there is always a response expected.
    Now the following thing appears: the receiver system could not handle many calls at one time (200 calls are planned at each run), the calls reduces the performance. Now gys at receiver system likes to develope a buffer of 10 seconds between the requests to handle some kind of load balancing with that. That means for the request that it the response takes +10 seconds back to backend. It is also possible to handle that in SAP backend with a waiting-statement in coding, so there is no need to go from sync to async - but the customer requested us to implement this scenario in async.
    JMS is always async, I know. But the Service Interfaces for Inbound and Outbound are of mode sync - so I can call my outbound Interface class in backend with Importing Output and Exporting Input.
    My question is: makes it sense to go from sync to an async scenario?
    And how looks the coding in backend for the response? I guess that it only makes sense to switch to async when no response entry is needed (example: for write operations).
    Thanks in Advance,
    Stefan

    > But in case of switching, what is the best way?
    > Should I implement 2 senarios? Or is it ok to switch the Inbound and Outbound Service Interface from sync to async?
    I don't think you need 2 scenarios for this. Just one is enough with different RDs.
    Over all in this case you have to re-create/modify the service interfaces and also you have to create 2 interface mappings. You have to also create the new inbound and outbound proxies since service interface mode will be changed. For outbound proxy the code can be reused and for inbound proxy also logic and code can be taken from your old code.

  • When I installed Lion on my macbook, I lost some apps on my iPhone.  Does that make sense?

    When I updated my Macbook to LIon, I seemed to have lost apps on my iPhone.  Does that make sense?

    just re-download them.

  • Does it makes sense to create an index on a column used for partitioning

    I am new to using partitions along with index. Can someone help me with the situation below?
    I have a table defined like below
    CREATE TABLE FACT_MASTER
    PERIODCODE NUMBER(8) NOT NULL,
    PRODUCT_CD NUMBER(10) NOT NULL,
    DPT_CD NUMBER(3),
    FACT_VALUE1 NUMBER,
    FACT_VALUE2 NUMBER,
    FACT_VALUE3 NUMBER,
    FACT_VALUE50 NUMBER
    PARTITION BY RANGE (PERIODCODE)
    partition P1 values less than (2002),
    partition P2 values less than (2003),
    partition P3 values less than (2004),
    This table is partitioned by range on Period code.
    In a select query on this table, period code and product code are being used. I am planning to create an index to boost the performance. Does it make sense to include the period code column also in the index? I am planning to create index only for the product code column. I am thinking that the partition itself will act like an index for periodcode. Can someone tell me if this is correct? I am using 10g.
    Edited by: user6794035 on Jan 21, 2010 8:47 AM
    Edited by: user6794035 on Jan 21, 2010 8:50 AM

    In your scenario I think it's better not to create an index on PERIODCODE because this column probaly has a only few distinct values.
    In other scenarios, when in the same partition there are many distinct values of the partitioning key, creating an index can be an advantage for query performances..
    But it depends on the specific context...
    Max
    [My Italian Oracle blog|http://oracleitalia.wordpress.com/2010/01/17/supporto-di-xml-schema-in-oracle-xmldb/]

  • When does proactive caching make sense?

    Hi all!
    An standard pattern for multi-dimensional cube is to have
    one cube doing heavy time-consuming processing and then synchronize it to query cubes.
    In this setup, will pro-active caching makes sense?
    Best regards
    Bjørn
    B. D. Jensen

    Hello Jensen,
    Proactive Cache is useful low volume data cubes where data is updating frequently like inventory, forecasting etc. But I will tell you with my own experience Proactive cache in SSAS is not worth. It behaves unexpectedly some times when data update/insert/Delete
    in source table the cube doesn't start its processing ,  better you create a SQL Job to process the cube after specified time .
    If you want to process the cube in specified interval then I would suggest you to go with SQL JOB
    blog:My Blog/
    Hope this will help you !!!
    Sanjeewan

  • By default in BPC values are sum in node level, It does not make sense to sum averages on parent nodes.

    HI Guys
    we have an business requirement to store data in average figures ,
    The values  are entered on the base member level but in reports we need to show average values  on the parents level instead of sum
    ( by default in BPC values are sum in node level),it does not make sense to sum averages on parent nodes.
    we managed it with excel formulas ,but we r facing the problem with dimensions which are in context.
    (i tried using dim memeber formulas but AVG key word is not accepting the system in member formulas)
    at last by using formula we managed the report but im worried abt that if there is no formulas ,how we will manage
    pls suggest any solution to show average values on the node level in specific reports

    Hi Krao,
    Please define what do you mean by average - arithmetic average or weighted average (has more business sense to my mind).
    Also, please provide some samples, explaining dimensions used in average calculation.
    In our case we use dimension member formulas to show average prices, discounts etc. in the reports.
    B.R. Vadim

Maybe you are looking for

  • How to add layers from different images?

    I would like to use layers from several images in a single image. The idea is to give an x-ray view so that you can see images of different views of an object by selecting the opacity of the various layers. It would be similar to an image of the anat

  • How to add user from domain A to a group in domain B

    How would you acheive adding a user from domain A to a group that is in domain B via powershell without the Quest cmdlets? I've been trying to figure this out for about a week now. Please let me know if the scripting guy has seen this issue before. L

  • My edited photos will not display when clicked on, a large triangle with exclmation comes up

    my edited photos will not display when clicked on, instead a large grey area comes up wiht a triangle /exclamation sign. 

  • Dynamic host address in FTP channel...

    Hi, My requirement is to send the file to a particular FTP server depending on the value in input. Can i give FTP Server address dynamically? If its possible please explain me to achieve this. I would be glad if anyone could provide me the alternativ

  • Some errors occured.(6a88)

    I've found some errors on the jcshell and I don't know what they really are. I'm using eclipse 3 with jcop 3.1 plug-in. Is there anyone tell me about this problem please. thnk u in advance:D cm> delete 63617264746573742e617070 => 80 E4 00 00 0E 4F 0C