Doubt in Firing Query with multiple opportunities UUID/IDs

HI Folks!
I might have simple doubt but please help me on this!
1. I have a custom BO with association to opportunities.
[DeploymentUnit(CustomerRelationshipManagement)] businessobject Sy_Trade {
[AlternativeKey] [Label("Trade Id")] element tradeid : BusinessTransactionDocumentID;
node RelatedOpportunities [0,n]{
                              element BusinessTransactionDocumentReference : BusinessTransactionDocumentReference;
                              element BusinessTransactionDocumentRelationshipRoleCode : BusinessTransactionDocumentRelationshipRoleCode;
                               association RelatedOpportunity[0,1] to Opportunity;
2. I have success fully used association and i am able to view create all the opportunities related to my custom Bo.
ISSUE : I want a facet where i just want DISPLAY the activities and sales document assigned in the RELATED OPPORTUNITIES ( N opportunities )
How do i query with Multiple opportunities ID and fetch the activities against it?
Btw I want to use query in UI Designer... I have created an advanced list pane and there i want the result list
I hope i am clear!
Thanks in adavance...
Regards
Dhruvin

Hi Ludger,
I have successfully displayed Related Opportunities associated with trade.( i am able to create , delete also )
Issue : I am not able to "Display" ( i don't need to edit or create ) all the activities created against all the opportunities in a different tab.
I tried to approaches :
1: Query : Created a Query on Activity BO and tried to pass multiple related opportunities ( but seems not possible , please tell me any possibility to pass range of opportunity via transformation or anything? )
2 : binding : I have a Node Related Opportunity so just tried to bind it with BO model but problem is it is displaying all the activities of first opportunity of the list...
i think why because :
In Data model I have created a table bind with Related Opportunities...
now that node is 1 to N , association to opportunity 0 to 1 , hence i think it fetches only 1 opportunities activity
should i create like below ( Or is it possible)
Node Reltdoppts[0,1]
association [0,N] to opportunity BO ?
Although i strongly feel SAP should provied us two things :
1. We need to pass range of opportunities in a query.
2. We need to just write some absl code where i can fill the table and display it
and also is there any possibility to create a report or something to display activities as we just want to display the activities!
P.S : I have been getting a lot of bashing from client because some of the product restriction in cloud! i hope and wish SAP give developers free hand to develop right now its like our hands are tied to many things

Similar Messages

BaseTableName blank when calling GetSchema on a query with multiple tables

I am using ODP.NET 11.2.0.3.0 and when calling GetSchemaTable on a DataReader that contains a join the returned SchemaTable has the BaseTableName and BaseColumnName fields blank - this is different than what I see with the Oracle OLE DB Provider and with how SQL Server's native provider works. I can't find any discussion of this - is this on purpose or is it a bug? why does the available schema information vary so drastically between a single table query and a query with multiple tables joined?
Thanks,
Bryan Hinton

Hi Bryan,
I am also facing the same issue. Did u find any work around or any suggestions will be well appreciated.
Thanks,
Naresh.

Oracle hangs on query with multiple joins

To test the sotftware from the LMS-vendor that are out partners we use virtual machines where we install Windows 2003 servers and Oracle XE
While we were testing the software I've found that a particular query with multiple unions causes the CPU of the virtual machine totally claimed by oracle
The query causes oracle to hang.
I've found that the subcomponents of the query all return 0 rows (and response all immediately) combined into a query with at least 2 unions the query hangs the system
I'm not familiar with with Database Management at all
I've read something about SGA and PGA that could be the issue and tried to increase the target for both but it doesn't seem to do anything
Some characterics
Target Current
Maximum System Global Area (SGA) Size: 380 MB 380 MB
Program Global Area (PGA) Aggregate Target: 360 MB 38 MB
Current Configuration: (SGA + PGA): 740 MB 418 MB
Tablespaces Percent Used Allocated (MB) Used (MB) Datafiles
SYSAUX 98.21% 460.00 451.75 1
SYSTEM 73.09% 510.00 372.75 1
DATA 99.13% 440.00 436.19 1
UNDO 6.48% 160.00 10.38 1
USERS 1.63% 100.00 1.63 1
sort_area_size 65536
shared_pool_reserved_size 5452595 TRUE size in bytes of reserved area of shared pool
shared_pool_size 0 TRUE size in bytes of shared pool
What other parameters are important? How could I get a good picture to see what's really going on?
Some pointers, help would be appreciated.
Regards,
Remco

Below is the base-query that is causing the problems
SELECT /* Public - Internal learner */ r.id reg_id, i.id order_item_id, o.id order_id, o.order_no order_number, e.id person_id, format_name(e.fname , e.lname , @@005) learner_name , c.id company_id, c.name2 , ent.id entid, ctype.id ctypeid, ctype.name , i.status , items.description item_desc, substr ( i.flags , 1 , 1 ) is_conf , r.status status1, rs.description description1 , r.wlist_priority , r.reg_no , r.flags , o.status status2, o.split, null learnerViewOnly, null statusViewOnly, i.approved_status, decode(substr(r.flags,2,1),'1','true','false') isWalkIn, oa.id offering_action_id, oa.status profile_status ,c.name2 org_name ,ctype.name audience_sub_type ,items.description description ,o.order_no order_no ,orderList.description order_status ,approvalList.description approval_status ,e.fname learner_first_name ,e.lname learner_last_name FROM tpt_registration r INNER JOIN tpt_oe_order_items i ON i.reg_id = r.id INNER JOIN tpt_oe_order o ON i.order_id = o.id INNER JOIN cmt_person e ON r.student_id = e.id INNER JOIN tpt_company c ON e.company_id = c.id INNER JOIN tpt_offering_action oa on r.offering_action_id = oa.id LEFT OUTER JOIN tpt_roster_template_entry ent ON r.ros_temp_ent_id = ent.id LEFT OUTER JOIN tpt_customer_type ctype ON ent.customer_type_id = ctype.id INNER JOIN fgt_ext_sys_list_of_val rs ON to_char ( r.status ) = rs.name INNER JOIN fgt_ext_sys_list_of_val items ON to_char ( i.status ) = items.name INNER JOIN fgt_ext_sys_list_of_val orderList ON to_char ( o.status ) = orderList.name INNER JOIN fgt_ext_sys_list_of_val approvalList ON to_char(i.approved_status) = approvalList.name WHERE e.type = 100 AND r.class_id = @@001 AND r.status = nvl ( to_number(@@002) , r.status ) AND rs.locale_id = @@005 AND rs.list_id = 'sysli000000000000100' AND items.locale_id = @@005 AND items.list_id = 'sysli000000000000131' AND orderList.list_id = 'sysli000000000000129' AND orderList.locale_id = @@005 AND approvalList.list_id = 'sysli000000000000165' AND approvalList.locale_id = @@005 AND ((@@003 is null) or (@@003 is not null and r.student_id = @@003))
UNION
SELECT /* Public - External learner */ r.id reg_id, i.id order_item_id, o.id order_id, o.order_no , e.id person_id, format_name(e.fname , e.lname , @@005) , c.id company_id, c.name2 , ent.id entid, ctype.id ctypeid, ctype.name , i.status , items.description , substr ( i.flags , 1 , 1 ) is_conf , r.status status1, rs.description description1, r.wlist_priority , r.reg_no , r.flags , o.status status2, o.split, null learnerViewOnly, null statusViewOnly, i.approved_status, decode(substr(r.flags,2,1),'1','true','false') isWalkIn, oa.id offering_action_id, oa.status profile_status ,c.name2 org_name ,ctype.name audience_sub_type ,items.description description ,o.order_no order_no ,orderList.description order_status ,approvalList.description approval_status ,e.fname learner_first_name ,e.lname learner_last_name FROM tpt_registration r INNER JOIN tpt_oe_order_items i ON i.reg_id = r.id INNER JOIN tpt_oe_order o ON i.order_id = o.id INNER JOIN cmt_person e ON r.student_id = e.id INNER JOIN tpt_offering_action oa on r.offering_action_id = oa.id LEFT OUTER JOIN tpt_company c ON e.company_id = c.id LEFT OUTER JOIN tpt_roster_template_entry ent ON r.ros_temp_ent_id = ent.id LEFT OUTER JOIN tpt_customer_type ctype ON ent.customer_type_id = ctype.id INNER JOIN fgt_ext_sys_list_of_val rs ON to_char ( r.status ) = rs.name INNER JOIN fgt_ext_sys_list_of_val items ON to_char ( i.status ) = items.name INNER JOIN fgt_ext_sys_list_of_val orderList ON to_char ( o.status ) = orderList.name INNER JOIN fgt_ext_sys_list_of_val approvalList ON to_char(i.approved_status) = approvalList.name WHERE e.type = 200 AND r.class_id = @@001 AND r.status = nvl ( to_number(@@002) , r.status ) AND rs.locale_id = @@005 AND rs.list_id = 'sysli000000000000100' AND items.locale_id = @@005 AND items.list_id = 'sysli000000000000131' AND orderList.list_id = 'sysli000000000000129' AND orderList.locale_id = @@005 AND approvalList.list_id = 'sysli000000000000165' AND approvalList.locale_id = @@005 AND ((@@003 is null) or (@@003 is not null and r.student_id = @@003))
UNION
SELECT /* Public - Unassigned learner */ r.id reg_id, i.id order_item_id, o.id order_id, o.order_no , null person_id, null , null company_id, null , ent.id entidd, ctype.id ctypeid, ctype.name , i.status , items.description , substr ( i.flags , 1 , 1 ) is_conf , r.status status1, rs.description description1, r.wlist_priority , r.reg_no , r.flags , o.status status2, o.split, null learnerViewOnly, null statusViewOnly, i.approved_status, decode(substr(r.flags,2,1),'1','true','false') isWalkIn, oa.id offering_action_id, oa.status profile_status ,'' org_name ,ctype.name audience_sub_type ,items.description description ,o.order_no order_no ,orderList.description order_status ,approvalList.description approval_status ,'' learner_first_name ,'' learner_last_name FROM tpt_registration r INNER JOIN tpt_oe_order_items i ON i.reg_id = r.id INNER JOIN tpt_oe_order o ON i.order_id = o.id INNER JOIN tpt_offering_action oa on oa.id = r.offering_action_id LEFT OUTER JOIN tpt_roster_template_entry ent ON r.ros_temp_ent_id = ent.id LEFT OUTER JOIN tpt_customer_type ctype ON ent.customer_type_id = ctype.id INNER JOIN fgt_ext_sys_list_of_val rs ON to_char ( r.status ) = rs.name INNER JOIN fgt_ext_sys_list_of_val items ON to_char ( i.status ) = items.name INNER JOIN fgt_ext_sys_list_of_val orderList ON to_char ( o.status ) = orderList.name INNER JOIN fgt_ext_sys_list_of_val approvalList ON to_char(i.approved_status) = approvalList.name WHERE r.class_id = @@001 AND r.status = nvl ( to_number(@@002) , r.status ) AND r.student_id is null AND rs.locale_id = @@005 AND rs.list_id = 'sysli000000000000100' AND items.locale_id = @@005 AND items.list_id = 'sysli000000000000131' AND orderList.list_id = 'sysli000000000000129' AND orderList.locale_id = @@005 AND approvalList.list_id = 'sysli000000000000165' AND approvalList.locale_id = @@005 AND @@003 is null
UNION
SELECT /* Private - Internal learner */ r.id reg_id, i.id order_item_id, o.id order_id, o.order_no , e.id person_id, format_name(e.fname , e.lname , @@005) , c.id company_id, c.name2 , ent.id entid, ctype.id ctypeid, ctype.name , i.status , items.description , substr ( i.flags , 1 , 1 ) is_conf , r.status status1, rs.description description1 , r.wlist_priority , r.reg_no , r.flags , o.status status2, o.split, null learnerViewOnly, null statusViewOnly, i.approved_status, decode(substr(r.flags,2,1),'1','true','false') isWalkIn, oa.id offering_action_id, oa.status profile_status ,c.name2 org_name ,ctype.name audience_sub_type ,items.description description ,o.order_no order_no ,orderList.description order_status ,approvalList.description approval_status ,e.fname learner_first_name ,e.lname learner_last_name FROM tpt_registration r INNER JOIN let_pvt_offering_request pvt_offreq ON pvt_offreq.class_id = r.class_id INNER JOIN tpt_offering_action oa on oa.id = r.offering_action_id LEFT OUTER JOIN tpt_oe_order_items i ON i.part_id = pvt_offreq.id LEFT OUTER JOIN tpt_oe_order o ON i.order_id = o.id INNER JOIN cmt_person e ON r.student_id = e.id LEFT OUTER JOIN tpt_company c ON e.company_id = c.id LEFT OUTER JOIN tpt_roster_template_entry ent ON r.ros_temp_ent_id = ent.id LEFT OUTER JOIN tpt_customer_type ctype ON ent.customer_type_id = ctype.id INNER JOIN fgt_ext_sys_list_of_val rs ON to_char ( r.status ) = rs.name LEFT OUTER JOIN fgt_ext_sys_list_of_val items ON to_char ( i.status ) = items.name AND items.locale_id = @@005 AND items.list_id = 'sysli000000000000131' LEFT OUTER JOIN fgt_ext_sys_list_of_val orderList ON to_char ( o.status ) = orderList.name AND orderList.list_id = 'sysli000000000000129' AND orderList.locale_id = @@005 LEFT OUTER JOIN fgt_ext_sys_list_of_val approvalList ON to_char(i.approved_status) = approvalList.name AND approvalList.list_id = 'sysli000000000000165' AND approvalList.locale_id = @@005 WHERE e.type = 100 AND r.class_id = @@001 AND r.status = nvl ( to_number(@@002) , r.status ) AND rs.locale_id = @@005 AND rs.list_id = 'sysli000000000000100' AND ((@@003 is null) or (@@003 is not null and r.student_id = @@003))
UNION
SELECT /* Private - External learner */ r.id reg_id, i.id order_item_id, o.id order_id, o.order_no , e.id person_id, format_name(e.fname , e.lname , @@005) , c.id company_id, c.name2 , ent.id entid, ctype.id ctypeid, ctype.name , i.status , items.description , substr ( i.flags , 1 , 1 ) is_conf , r.status status1, rs.description description1 , r.wlist_priority , r.reg_no , r.flags , o.status status2, o.split, null learnerViewOnly, null statusViewOnly, i.approved_status, decode(substr(r.flags,2,1),'1','true','false') isWalkIn, oa.id offering_action_id, oa.status profile_status ,c.name2 org_name ,ctype.name audience_sub_type ,items.description description ,o.order_no order_no ,orderList.description order_status ,approvalList.description approval_status ,e.fname learner_first_name ,e.lname learner_last_name FROM tpt_registration r INNER JOIN let_pvt_offering_request pvt_offreq ON pvt_offreq.class_id = r.class_id INNER JOIN tpt_offering_action oa on r.offering_action_id = oa.id LEFT OUTER JOIN tpt_oe_order_items i ON i.part_id = pvt_offreq.id LEFT OUTER JOIN tpt_oe_order o ON i.order_id = o.id INNER JOIN cmt_person e ON r.student_id = e.id LEFT OUTER JOIN tpt_company c ON e.company_id = c.id LEFT OUTER JOIN tpt_roster_template_entry ent ON r.ros_temp_ent_id = ent.id LEFT OUTER JOIN tpt_customer_type ctype ON ent.customer_type_id = ctype.id INNER JOIN fgt_ext_sys_list_of_val rs ON to_char ( r.status ) = rs.name LEFT OUTER JOIN fgt_ext_sys_list_of_val items ON to_char ( i.status ) = items.name AND items.locale_id = @@005 AND items.list_id = 'sysli000000000000131' LEFT OUTER JOIN fgt_ext_sys_list_of_val orderList ON to_char ( o.status ) = orderList.name AND orderList.locale_id = @@005 AND orderList.list_id = 'sysli000000000000129' LEFT OUTER JOIN fgt_ext_sys_list_of_val approvalList ON to_char(i.approved_status) = approvalList.name AND approvalList.locale_id = @@005 AND approvalList.list_id = 'sysli000000000000165' WHERE e.type = 200 AND r.class_id = @@001 AND r.status = nvl ( to_number(@@002) , r.status ) AND rs.locale_id = @@005 AND rs.list_id = 'sysli000000000000100' AND ((@@003 is null) or (@@003 is not null and r.student_id = @@003)) ORDER BY 34,35,28,29,31,30,33,32

APD using Query with multiple structures as a data source

All,
I want to set up an automatic process which executes a query and exports it to a shared drive as a csv file. I have tried various options , when I try to use APD to set up the extract, I get an error and this is because the query that I am trying to use has Strucutres in both rows and columns. Hence, I am unable to use this option. I tried RSCRM_BAPI, It works well, but there is an issue with scheduling this in Process chain. I created an event and scheduled this as a job to trigger after "event" as per SAP instructions, but the job does not exist and it is not possible to trigger it through the Process chain unless the variables are hard coded in the query which I do not want to do.
Can any one tell me if there is a way to deal with APD using Query with multiple structures?
Would really appreciate if some one can give me the right solution...
Thanks

Hi Tanu ,
APD is an option but its not very good with large amount of data or hiearachies or if you have attributes in you query structure .
One more option for this requirement is use of report program using function module RRW3_GET_QUERY_VIEW_DATA .
This will work fine with multiple structure etc .
There are some overheads with this FM ex: if amount of data is too much then program will give dump .Solution for that is we call the FM in LOOP by diving amount of data need to be fetched .ex: we can read data quarter wise.
For using this function module what you can do is write an ABAP program (At SE38 ) .which will call this FM and then write the output into a flat file which you can save at application server (AL11) .From there other system can read it .
To automate this whole process you can further add all the report programs into a process chain (RSPC) which can be schedule as per requirement .
To pass input parameters you can use variants that will pass the values to the report .
Check thi link for sample code :
[http://www.tricktresor.de/content/index.php?navID=696&aID=496]
Hope this will be helpful .
Regards,
Jaya Tiwari

Query with multiple outer joins

I had a doubt with whether the following kind of query is valid with multiple outer-joins. The format of the query is something like this:-
select A.col1, B.col2
from table1 A, table2 B, table3 C where
A.col3=B.col4(+) and B.col5=C.col6(+)
This would mean the follwoing with regard to outer-joins in the query.
1) fetch records with col3 in table A matching or not matching col4 in table B
2) fetch records with col5 in table B matching or not matching col6 in table C
So, this query is valid?
I hope, my question is clear.
Please, help in solving the doubt.
regards

This is valid and it works fine

Spatial Query with multiple geometries from 2 tables

Hi,
I'm using Oracle 8.1.7. I am trying to do a spatial query on two tables with multiple geometries. There are two spatial tables. One made up of points and one made up of polygons. There are 829551 rows in the table of points and 1817795 rows in the table with polygons...
I want to find all polygons where one of this points is within it...
This query is pretty intensive querying two large spatial tables against each other and so I need to find the most efficient way of running this query. I've been running variations of my query for the last two week and every time it's bombed out with various errors after 12-24 hrs processing like out of memory, out of tablespace, out of processing, invalid index etc etc etc. I need to get this query run asap... Any tips would be gratefully appreciated..
For the session running the query I've allocated 16M sort area with
ALTER SESSION SET SORT_AREA_SIZE=16777216;
Below is the query I'm running... How can I improve this please? BTW PARCEL_OVERLAPS contains the points and TP$_PARCEL_AREAS the polygons.
SELECT lu.LNU_PARCEL_ID
     FROM
          seventy.PARCEL_OVERLAPS po,
          imap_topol.TP$_PARCEL_AREAS pa,
          TP$_PARCEL_CENTROID_AREA pca,
          TDCR_LAND_UNIT lu
     WHERE
          SDO_FILTER(po.geometry, pa.area,
          'querytype=WINDOW') = TRUE and
          sdo_within_distance(po.geometry,pa.area,'distance=0')='TRUE' and
          pa.delete_date is null and
          Lu.LNU_LAND_UNIT_UNIQUE_NUM = pca.CENTROID_ID and
          pa.AREA_ID = pca.AREA_ID and
          pca.DELETE_DATE IS NULL and
          pa.DELETE_DATE IS NULL;

Albert,
Thanks for your reply and the tips you've given. The tp$_parcel_areas table will always be bigger so I've changed the order to sdo_within_distance(pa.area,po.geometry,'distance=0')='TRUE'. The requested counts for those queries are
12:26:29 [email protected]:SQL> select count(*)
13:46:22 2 from seventy.PARCEL_OVERLAPS;
COUNT(*)
612
13:48:12 [email protected]:SQL> select count(*)
13:48:17 2 from imap_topol.TP$_PARCEL_AREAS pa,
13:48:21 3 TP$_PARCEL_CENTROID_AREA pca
13:48:21 4 where pca.DELETE_DATE IS NULL
13:48:21 5 and pa.DELETE_DATE IS NULL
13:48:21 6 and pa.AREA_ID = pca.AREA_ID;
COUNT(*)
1310665
There was no reason for both filter and within_distance. I did try use the anyinteract but for some reason that does not return the desired results(I've added one id row as a test to make sure it returns desired results). Plus Oracle have recomended using the within distance for better performance..
so the explan plan for
14:38:37 [email protected]:SQL> EXPLAIN PLAN FOR
14:38:50 2 SELECT lu.LNU_PARCEL_ID
14:38:50 3 FROM
14:38:50 4 seventy.PARCEL_OVERLAPS po,
14:38:50 5 imap_topol.TP$_PARCEL_AREAS pa,
14:38:50 6 TP$_PARCEL_CENTROID_AREA pca,
14:38:50 7 TDCR_LAND_UNIT lu
14:38:50 8 WHERE
14:38:50 9 sdo_within_distance(pa.area,po.geometry,'distance=0')='TRUE' and
14:38:50 10 pa.delete_date is null and
14:38:50 11 Lu.LNU_LAND_UNIT_UNIQUE_NUM = pca.CENTROID_ID and
14:38:50 12 pa.AREA_ID = pca.AREA_ID and
14:38:50 13 pca.DELETE_DATE IS NULL and
14:38:50 14 pa.DELETE_DATE IS NULL;
is
Plan Table
| Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes| Cost | Pstart| Pstop |
| SELECT STATEMENT | | 4G|32920G| 547M| | |
| NESTED LOOPS | | 4G|32920G| 547M| | |
| MERGE JOIN | | 547M| 2029G| 230124 | | |
| SORT JOIN | | 1M| 36M| 85014 | | |
| MERGE JOIN | | 1M| 36M| 50019 | | |
| SORT JOIN | | 1M| 17M| 21650 | | |
| TABLE ACCESS FULL |TP$_PARCE | 1M| 17M| 485 | | |
| SORT JOIN | | 1M| 22M| 28369 | | |
| TABLE ACCESS FULL |TDCR_LAND | 1M| 22M| 2127 | | |
| SORT JOIN | | 42K| 160M| 145111 | | |
| TABLE ACCESS FULL |TP$_PARCE | 42K| 160M| 12697 | | |
| TABLE ACCESS FULL |PARCEL_OV | 817 | 3M| 1 | | |
14:43:14 [email protected]:SQL> explain plan for
14:43:23 2 SELECT pa.AREA_ID
14:43:23 3 FROM seventy.PARCEL_OVERLAPS po,
14:43:23 4 imap_topol.TP$_PARCEL_AREAS pa
14:43:23 5 WHERE SDO_RELATE(po.geometry, pa.area,'mask=ANTINTERACT querytype=WINDOW') = 'TRUE'
14:43:23 6 and pa.DELETE_DATE IS NULL;
Plan Table
| Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes| Cost | Pstart| Pstop |
| SELECT STATEMENT | | 6M| 50G| 10M| | |
| NESTED LOOPS | | 6M| 50G| 10M| | |
| TABLE ACCESS FULL |PARCEL_OV | 817 | 3M| 1 | | |
| TABLE ACCESS FULL |TP$_PARCE | 850K| 3G| 12697 | | |
14:45:03 [email protected]:SQL> explain plan for
14:45:04 2 SELECT pa.AREA_ID
14:45:05 3 FROM seventy.PARCEL_OVERLAPS po,
14:45:05 4 imap_topol.TP$_PARCEL_AREAS pa
14:45:05 5 WHERE SDO_RELATE(pa.area, po.geometry,'mask=ANTINTERACT querytype=WINDOW') = 'TRUE'
14:45:05 6 and pa.DELETE_DATE IS NULL;
Plan Table
| Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes| Cost | Pstart| Pstop |
| SELECT STATEMENT | | 6M| 50G| 863554 | | |
| NESTED LOOPS | | 6M| 50G| 863554 | | |
| TABLE ACCESS FULL |TP$_PARCE | 850K| 3G| 12697 | | |
| TABLE ACCESS FULL |PARCEL_OV | 817 | 3M| 1 | | |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

How to create the query with multiple node types

Hi,
I am having an issue in creating a query to search multiple node types.
The requirement is to query documents/pages of the type dam:Asset and cq:Page present under a path.
I tried the following code snippet with no luck .
path=/content
1_type=cq:Page
2_type=dam:Asset
property=jcr:content/metadata/@cq:tags
property.1_value=<tag Name>
I was able to write a query with single type. However i could not find any documents/ materials with multipe types as shown above.
Thanks in advance.
Regards
Sudhi

I don't think multiple type is possible. Instead use super type like nt:base that will cover both page and asset.
Yogesh
www.wemblog.com

SAP Query with Multiple lines

HI Team,
Can we create multiple lines in an SAP Query? If yes, how (pls explain the steps)?
Like can we have a line for the employee, next for spouse & then the next for child, so on...and then the next employee details.
Also, there might be fields which will repeat in most of these lines for each employee.
Thanks
RL

Hi RL:
HR module have PA0021 table (HR Master Record: Infotype 0021 (Family), with this table into TCODE: SQ02 is naturally obtain the result that you ask, or Do you are customizing "Z" program with ALV?
Regards
José Luis

Hierarchical query with multiple roots

Hi,
I'm trying to write a sql query to find blocking lock in database. The idea is to get the blocker in 1st column, comma separated list of waiters in 2nd column and number of waiters in 3rd column.
As of now i use below query to get a tree structure
WITH lk AS
     (SELECT blocking_session||' (Inst-'||blocking_instance || ')' blocker,
             SID||' (Inst-'||inst_id || ')' waiter
        FROM gv$session
       WHERE blocking_instance IS NOT NULL AND blocking_session IS NOT NULL)
SELECT     LPAD (' ', 2 * (LEVEL - 1)) || waiter lock_tree
      FROM (SELECT *
              FROM lk
            UNION ALL
            SELECT DISTINCT 'root', blocker
                       FROM lk
                      WHERE blocker NOT IN (SELECT waiter
                                              FROM lk))
CONNECT BY PRIOR waiter = blocker
START WITH blocker = 'root';
Result:-
===========
LOCK_TREE
1966 (Inst-1)
908 (Inst-1)
1906 (Inst-1)
1900 (Inst-1)
981 (Inst-1)
921 (Inst-1)
937 (Inst-1)
962 (Inst-1)
1889 (Inst-1)
1904 (Inst-1)
974 (Inst-1) But what i expect is like below. My below query works when there is only one root blocker, but fails when there are multiple root node.
WITH lk AS
     (SELECT blocking_session || '(Inst-' || blocking_instance || ')' blocker,
             SID || '(Inst-' || inst_id || ')' waiter
        FROM gv$session
       WHERE blocking_instance IS NOT NULL AND blocking_session IS NOT NULL)
SELECT     blocker, SUBSTR (SYS_CONNECT_BY_PATH (waiter, ';'), 2) waiters
      FROM (SELECT   blocker, waiter, ROW_NUMBER () OVER (ORDER BY waiter)
                                                                          val
                FROM lk
            GROUP BY blocker, waiter)
     WHERE CONNECT_BY_ISLEAF = 1
START WITH val = 1
CONNECT BY PRIOR val = val - 1
Result:-
===========
WAITERS# BLOCKER                                                                                 WAITERS
         3 981(Inst-1)                                                                             1904(Inst-1);921(Inst-1);937(Inst-1)
....lot of duplicates
expected result:-
===========
WAITERS# BLOCKER                                                                                 WAITERS
         4 981(Inst-1)                                                                             1904(Inst-1);921(Inst-1);937(Inst-1);974(Inst-1)
         3 1966(Inst-1)                                                                             908 (Inst-1);1906 (Inst-1);1900 (Inst-1) can you please help me correct above query or suggest other ways to archive this result.
Thanks in advance
MidhunGT

Hi All,
Thank you all for your support. I never knew these many ways to see blocking lock in database :)
Somehow i was able get the desired result for my specific requirement with below query
sql> WITH lk AS
2       (SELECT blocking_session || ' (Inst-' || blocking_instance
3               || ')' blocker,
4               SID || ' (Inst-' || inst_id || ')' waiter
5          FROM gv$session
6         WHERE blocking_instance IS NOT NULL AND blocking_session IS NOT NULL)
7 SELECT     blocker,
8             LTRIM
9                (MAX (SYS_CONNECT_BY_PATH (waiter, ','))KEEP (DENSE_RANK LAST ORDER BY cnt),
10                 ','
11                ) AS waiters,
12             MAX (cnt) waiters#
13        FROM (SELECT blocker, waiter,
14                     ROW_NUMBER () OVER (PARTITION BY blocker ORDER BY waiter)
15                                                                         AS cnt
16                FROM lk)
17    GROUP BY blocker
18 CONNECT BY cnt - 1 = PRIOR cnt AND blocker = PRIOR blocker
19 START WITH cnt = 1;
BLOCKER         WAITERS                                                                            WAITERS#
1946 (Inst-1)   1987 (Inst-1),879 (Inst-1),910 (Inst-1)                                                3
930 (Inst-1)    1919 (Inst-1),1945 (Inst-1),1953 (Inst-1),1983 (Inst-1)                                4please advice, if any scope for improvement
Thanks and Regards,
MidhunGT

Sql query with multiple joins to same table

I have to write a query for a client to display business officers' names and title along with the business name
The table looks like this
AcctNumber
OfficerTitle
OfficerName
RecKey
90% of the businesses have exactly 4 officer records, although some have less and some have more.
There is a separate table that has the AcctNumber, BusinessName about 30 other fields that I don’t need
An individual account can have 30 or 40 records on the other table.
The client wants to display 1 record per account.
Initially I wrote a query to join the table to itself:
Select A.OfficerTtitle, A.OfficerName, B.OfficerTitle, B.OfficerName, C.OfficerTtitle, C.OfficerName, D.OfficerTitle, D.OfficerName where A.AcctNumber = B.AcctNumber and A.AcctNumber = C.AcctNumber and A.AcctNumber = D.AcctNumber
This returned tons of duplicate rows for each account ( number of records * number of records, I think)
So added
And A.RecKey > B.RecKey and B.RecKey > C. RecKey and C.RecKey . D.RecKey
This works when there are exactly 4 records per account. If there are less than 4 records on the account it skips the account and if there are more than 4 records, it returns multiple rows.
But when I try to l join this to the other table to get the business name, I get a row for every record on the other table
I tried select distinct on the other table and the query runs for ever and never returns anything
I tried outer joins and subqueries, but no luck so far. I was thinking maybe a subquery - if exists - because I don't know how many records there are on an account, but don't know how to structure that
Any suggestions would be appreciated

Welcome to the forum!
user13319842 wrote:
I have to write a query for a client to display business officers' names and title along with the business name
The table looks like this
AcctNumber
OfficerTitle
OfficerName
RecKey
90% of the businesses have exactly 4 officer records, although some have less and some have more.
There is a separate table that has the AcctNumber, BusinessName about 30 other fields that I don’t need
An individual account can have 30 or 40 records on the other table.
The client wants to display 1 record per account.As someone has already mentioned, you should post CREATE TABLE and INSERT statements for both tables (relevant columns only). You don't have to post a lot of sample data. For example, you need to pick 1 out of 30 or 40 rows (max) for the same account, but it's almost certainly enough if you post only 3 or 4 rows (max) for an account.
Also, post the results you want from the sample data that you post, and explain how you get those resutls from that data.
Always say which version of Oracle you're using. This sounds like a PIVOT problem, and a new SELECT .... PIVOT feature was introduced in Oracle 11.1. If you're using Oracle 11, you don't want to have to learn the old way to do pivots. On the other hand, if you have Oracle 10, a solution that uses a new feature that you don't have won't help you.
Whenever you have a question, please post CREATE TABLE and INSERT statements for some sample data, the results you want from that data, an explanation, and your Oracle version.
Initially I wrote a query to join the table to itself:
Select A.OfficerTtitle, A.OfficerName, B.OfficerTitle, B.OfficerName, C.OfficerTtitle, C.OfficerName, D.OfficerTitle, D.OfficerName where A.AcctNumber = B.AcctNumber and A.AcctNumber = C.AcctNumber and A.AcctNumber = D.AcctNumber Be careful, and post the exact code that you're running. The statement above can't be what you ran, because it doesn't have a FROM clause.
This returned tons of duplicate rows for each account ( number of records * number of records, I think)
So added
And A.RecKey > B.RecKey and B.RecKey > C. RecKey and C.RecKey . D.RecKey
This works when there are exactly 4 records per account. If there are less than 4 records on the account it skips the account and if there are more than 4 records, it returns multiple rows.
But when I try to l join this to the other table to get the business name, I get a row for every record on the other table
I tried select distinct on the other table and the query runs for ever and never returns anything
I tried outer joins and subqueries, but no luck so far. I was thinking maybe a subquery - if exists - because I don't know how many records there are on an account, but don't know how to structure that
Any suggestions would be appreciatedDisplaying 1 column from n rows as n columns on 1 row is called Pivoting . See the following link fro several ways to do pivots:
SQL and PL/SQL FAQ
Pivoting requires that you know exactly how many columns will be in the result set. If that number depends on the data in the table, then you might prefer to use String Aggregation , where the output consists of a huge string column, that contains the concatenation of the data from n rows. This big string can be formatted so that it looks like multiple columns. For different string aggregation techniques, see:
http://www.oracle-base.com/articles/10g/StringAggregationTechniques.php
The following thread discusses some options for pivoting a variable number of columns:
Re: Report count and sum from many rows into many columns

MDM ABAP API: Query with Multiple Parameters

I would like to query MDM repository passing multiple parameters. I used the following code, however, it didn't work.
If I pass only one parameter, it works fine.
DATA lt_query                  TYPE mdm_query_table.
DATA ls_query                 TYPE mdm_query.
DATA lv_search_text       TYPE string.
DATA lt_result_set            TYPE mdm_search_result_table.
DATA ls_result_set           LIKE LINE OF lt_result_set.
* Fill query structure with FIRST parameter
    ls_query-parameter_code = 'Name'.
    ls_query-operator        = 'CS'.
    ls_query-dimension_type = mdmif_search_dim_field.
    ls_query-constraint_type = mdmif_search_constr_text.
    lv_search_text = 'BMW'.
    GET REFERENCE OF lv_search_text INTO ls_query-value_low.
    APPEND ls_query TO lt_query.
* Fill query structure with SECOND parameter
    ls_query-parameter_code = 'Model'.
    ls_query-operator        = 'CS'.
    ls_query-dimension_type = mdmif_search_dim_field.
    ls_query-constraint_type = mdmif_search_constr_text.
    lv_search_text = '2009'.
    GET REFERENCE OF lv_search_text INTO ls_query-value_low.
    APPEND ls_query TO lt_query.
* Query on records (search for value 'BMW' model '2009' in table Products)
    CALL METHOD lr_api->mo_core_service->query
      EXPORTING
        iv_object_type_code = 'Products'
        it_query            = lt_query
      IMPORTING
        et_result_set       = lt_result_set.

Hi,
I see you are not clearing your local structure "ls_query". This could be reason of problem, try this and let us know the result:
DATA lt_query                  TYPE mdm_query_table.
DATA ls_query                 TYPE mdm_query.
DATA lv_search_text       TYPE string.
DATA lt_result_set            TYPE mdm_search_result_table.
DATA ls_result_set           LIKE LINE OF lt_result_set.
Fill query structure with FIRST parameter
    ls_query-parameter_code = 'Name'.
    ls_query-operator        = 'CS'.
    ls_query-dimension_type = mdmif_search_dim_field.
    ls_query-constraint_type = mdmif_search_constr_text.
    lv_search_text = 'BMW'.
    GET REFERENCE OF lv_search_text INTO ls_query-value_low.
    APPEND ls_query TO lt_query.
CLEAR ls_query.
Fill query structure with SECOND parameter
    ls_query-parameter_code = 'Model'.
    ls_query-operator        = 'CS'.
    ls_query-dimension_type = mdmif_search_dim_field.
    ls_query-constraint_type = mdmif_search_constr_text.
    lv_search_text = '2009'.
    GET REFERENCE OF lv_search_text INTO ls_query-value_low.
    APPEND ls_query TO lt_query.
CLEAR ls_query.
Query on records (search for value 'BMW' model '2009' in table Products)
    CALL METHOD lr_api->mo_core_service->query
      EXPORTING
        iv_object_type_code = 'Products'
        it_query            = lt_query
      IMPORTING
        et_result_set       = lt_result_set.

Display a query with multiple results and a little addon :D

Hello everybody,
I wanna make a JSP page that displays multiple results from a query.
I wanna those results to appair in a table, a row each one, and also a little "square radio form buttton" that makes me select rows I wanna delete (with another button at the end)
any idea?
Better if you post the code, I'm not a good JSP writer
thanks everybody for your attention and your time
Kind regards

You're right.. I'd post nothing..
But it's all still in progress and I don't know what to post..
I understand is really difficult to invent some code without an origin (variables, functions, the bean), but also some general info would be really appreciated,also making a streched example if you can..
REQUESTS:
1) I need make a new JSP page, where will be visualize rows returned from a precise query selection
2)I use Beans, and my idea was to create Bean in JSP, open connection, make the query and create "some kind of FOR cycle" that fills a table, row by row
3)Every row must got a little "radio button" for a delete selection; the delete function will start when I press a specific button in this page(i'll use a servlet for this function)
4)The biggest and important trouble is HOW to display multiple rows in the Table

Update query with multiple foreign key parameters

I am trying to perform an update query on one field that uses multiple foreign key parameters from one table to update the other table. The data in all three foreign key parameter fields are not constant. Accuracy is absolutely critical. I tied this as well as other various scenarios with no success. Can anyone help?
Update A_table a
set a.rate = (
select b.rate
from B_table b
where b.id = a.id
and b.transdate = a.transdate
and b.orgnum = a.orgnum
and b.transdate = to_date('31/12/2007', 'dd/mm/yyyy')
)

I would check symbols by a user name and number of posts before calling anyone a hot shot, especially damorgon. 
Yes version matters (due to bugs and features in each version). 
DDL matters because of indexes and associations. 
Data matters because it makes a difference on how SQL can be written. 
Reasons why an SQL statement don't work is because we aren't looking over your shoulder at your screen. 
damorgon did leave off his list that the best place for this question is on the PL/SQL, where they will ask you similar questions in addition to your explain plan and data volumes.

SQL query with multiple tables - what is the most efficient way?

Hello I am learning PL/SQL. I have a simple procedure where I need to find number of employees and departments per location as per user input of location_id.
I have 3 Tables:
LOCATIONS
location_id (pk)
location_name
DEPARTMENTS
department_id (pk)
location_id (fk)
department_name
EMPLOYEES
employee_id (pk)
department_id (fk)
employee_name
1 Location can have 0-MANY Departments
1 Employee has 1 Department
Here is the query I came up with for PL/SQL procedure:
/*Ecount, Dcount are NUMBER variables */
SELECT SUM (EmployeeCount), COUNT(DepartmentNumber)
     INTO Ecount, Dcount
     FROM
     (SELECT COUNT(employee_id) EmployeeCount, department_id DepartmentNumber
          FROM employees
          GROUP BY department_id
          HAVING department_id IN
                    (SELECT department_id
                    FROM departments
                    WHERE location_id = userInput));
I do get the correct result, but I am just wondering if my query is on the right track and if there is a more "efficient" way of doing this.
Thanks in advance for helping a newbie out.

Hi,
Welcome to the forum!
Something like this will be more efficient:
SELECT    COUNT (employee_id)               AS ECount
,       COUNT (DISTINCT department_id)     AS DCount
FROM       employees
WHERE       department_id IN (     SELECT     department_id
                    FROM      departments
                    WHERE      location_id = :userInput
;You should also try a join instead of the IN subquery.
For efficiency, do only the things you need to do.
For example, you don't need a count of employees in each department, so don't compute one. That means you won't need the in-line view, so don't have one.
You don't need PL/SQL for this job, so don't use PL/SQL if you don't have to. (I realize this question was out of context, so you may have good reasons for doing this in PL/SQL.)
Do all filtering as early as possible. Don't waste effort computing things that won't be used .
A particular example of this is: Never use a HAVING clause when you can use a WHERE clause. What's the difference between a WHERE clause and a HAVING clause? The WHERE clause is applied before aggregate functions are computed, and the HAVING clause is applied after; there's no other difference. Therefore, if the HAVING clause isn't referencing an aggregate function, it could be done in a WHERE clause instead.

Tricky query with multiple hierarchial sub queries

Here's a pussle that I cannot solve. Who can help me?
Given table F (records form a binary tree with levels 0, 1, and
2):
Id IdParent
F1 null
F2 F1
F3 F2
F4 F2
F5 F1
F6 F5
F7 F5
and given table D (records form a similar binary tree with
levels 0, 1, and 2):
Id IdParent
D1 null
D2 D1
D3 D2
D4 D2
D5 D1
D6 D5
D7 D5
and given table P (cross referencing tables F and D):
IdF IdD
F2 D6
F3 D2
F5 D7
and given table S (which holds the seed to the query):
IdF
F3
and given table I (just any collection of records that reference
table D which we want to select records from):
Id IdD
I1 D1
I2 D2
I3 D3
I4 D4
I5 D5
I6 D6
I7 D7
I8 D1
I9 D5
all together being related like in figure 1:
S.IdF =>> F.Id
F.Id <- P.IdF
P.IdD -> D.Id
D.Id <<= I.IdD
where =>> denotes 'is or is a descenden of'
and -> denotes 'is'
I want to build a query that lets me select all records from
table I, which reference table D, such that the referenced
records in table D are hierarchial descendents of any record
that is referenced by records in table P, for which they
reference records in table F, which are ancestors to records
referenced by records in table S.
If it wasn't for the hierarchial approach on both sides of the
cross referencing table, matters would have been easy. Then the
releational map would have been like in figure 2:
S.IdF <- P.IdF
P.IdD -> I.IdD
and the query would have been:
SELECT I.Id
FROM I, P, S
WHERE I.IdD = P.IdD
AND P.IdF = S.IdF
So in what I am looking for, you may say that the '='-signs in
this select statement should denote 'is or is a descenden of'
going towards the side of table P.
Given the tables listed above and given the query I am seeking,
I expect to retrieve the following result set:
I.Id
I2
I3
I4
I6
Tricky, eh? I belive the figures are the best angles to
understand this problem.

You do this with subqueries and hierarchical queries...
First the hierarchal subquery on F...
SQL> SELECT f.id
2 FROM f
3 CONNECT BY PRIOR f.idp = f.id
4 START WITH f.id IN ( SELECT idf FROM s )
5 ;
ID
F3
F2
F1
Then join with the cross reference table...
SQL> SELECT p.idd
2 FROM p
3 , ( SELECT f.id
4 FROM f
5 START WITH f.id IN ( SELECT idf FROM s )
6 CONNECT BY PRIOR f.idp = f.id
7 ) s
8 WHERE s.id = p.idf
9 ;
ID
D6
D2
Use this as a subquery in a hierarchial query for the
descendents in D...
SQL> SELECT d.id
2 FROM d
3 START WITH d.idd IN ( SELECT p.idd
4 FROM p
5 , ( SELECT f.id
6 FROM f
7 START WITH f.id IN ( SELECT
idf FROM s )
8 CONNECT BY PRIOR f.idp = f.id
9 ) s
10 WHERE s.id = p.idf
11 )
12 CONNECT BY PRIOR d.id = d.idp
13 ;
ID
D2
D3
D4
D6
Then use that as a subquery to return the I result set...
SQL> SELECT i.id
2 FROM i
3 WHERE i.idd IN ( SELECT d.id
4 FROM d
5 START WITH d.id IN ( SELECT p.idd
6 FROM p
7 , ( SELECT
f.id
8 FROM f
9 START
WITH f.id IN ( SELECT idf FROM s )
10 CONNECT
BY PRIOR f.idp = f.id
11 ) s
12 WHERE s.id = p.idf
13 )
14 CONNECT BY PRIOR d.id = d.idp
15 )
16 ;
ID
I2
I3
I4
I6Good Luck...

Doubt in Firing Query with multiple opportunities UUID/IDs

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for