Downpayment Clearing in Logistic Invoice verification
Hi All,
we have activated Business Function " LOG_MMFI_P2P " and
Switch "MM_SFWS_CI_01 - Enhanced Functions in EhP4 for Applications in
Materials Management" using Tcode SFW1. And followed all instructions
documented when activated Business Function " LOG_MMFI_P2P ". The
Busines function is activated to order to clear downpayments at the
time of invoice posting in MIRO or MIR7. When I post the invoice in
MIRO system is posting 2 indepedent document as below.
1. Invoice posting,
Dr GR/IR
Cr Vendor
2. Downpayment Recovery
Dr Vendor
Cr Vendor with SP GL Indicator "C"
My point is, as per the link
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/48/b42c22e8603095e10000000a421937/frameset.htm, it says "You can use the Down Payment Clearing
function to clear down payments that you have posted with reference to
a purchase order without going to the relevant financial accounting
transactions, directly in logistics invoice verification."
But, in my case, the system is not clearing the downpayment but instead
is just posting a Credit memo account entry with SP GL indicator (refer
to th Downpayment Entry).
Please advice if SAP is designed to clear the downpayment in LIV or
just to post the downpayment recovery entry.
If advice on any corrections to be applied.
Best regards
Abishay Solomon
Hi
I am not sure, but as per your link
"The system displays the Down Payment Clearing pushbutton at header level"
are you getting any button there?
Regards
Kailas Ugale
Similar Messages
-
Vendor invoice and logistic invoice verification ?
Good morning Guru,
What is the difference between "vendor invoice" in accounting module and "logistic invoice verification" in MM module ?
I know logistic invoice verification to validate between po, gr and invoice, but what vendor invoice for ?
Thank'sHi
Accounting-wise both has the same result as in both the scenarios you can debit expense and credit vendor. The advantage of Logistics Invoice Verification over Vendor Invoice is, in Logistics Invoice verification, we have three way matching of documents ie PO,GR and Invoice. So if there is any mismatch between these, the invoice will get blocked for payment. Also it checks for accuracy between PO and invoice and GR and invoice, so that the expenses are accounted accurately and price diff account also effected appropriately.
In Vendor invoice booking, it is just like your normal journal entry and so it has not got that much authenticity over the correctness of transactions. In vendor invoice booking, there is every possibility of duplicate booking of invoice, whereas in LIV, the invoice will get blocked for payment.
Hope it is clear.
Regards,
K Lakshmanan -
Hello,
Would You help me with input fields during Logistic Invoice Verification? We have GR-based invoice verification and purchase order is created with order unit, which differs from order price unit. For example, PO quantity is 10 packing units (1 PAC = 10 pieces) and price is 1EUR per 1 piece. Goods receipt is done in packing units, but invoice is sent to us in pieces. During invoice verification I want to enter quantity in purchase order price unit (this field is read for input) and I expect that system will automatically calculate quantity in order unit using denominator for converting condition units to base units. But it does not happen so. See an example: GR 9 PAC (=90pieces), quantity invoiced 100 pieces. In trn.MIRO I want to enter 100 pieces and 10 PAC should be calculated automatically.
Would You help me with this problem?
Best regards,
NatalijaHi ,
LIV can be done with respect to GR . And system picks the data from PO and GR only . So there is no way you can change the unit in MIRO .
Its better you educate your vendor to send the invoice in units the way it has been made in PO .
Others can add to this if I am wrong .
Thanks
Dipak -
Out put logistic invoice verification (print out need in chinese language)
Hi All
In MR90 out put logistic invoice verification I am getting output (Printout) in English the requirement is chinese language has to add in output.I know however I need to take help of abaper.I want to know what r the configuration steps to fill this requirement.can any one help me regarding this. Points will be added..
Thanks
SriniHello
Check this link and coordinate with ABAper.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005vp/helpdata/en/d1/27d457f17b11d287d0080009b98822/frameset.htm
Reg
*assign points if useful -
Invoice verification and logistic invoice verification
Hello,
What is the different between invoice verification and logistic invoice verification?
My Japanese client need to work with t.code: VXJ2 - customs declaration for import billing documents - Japan
When i run this report, it finds no data.
I read the help for this transaction and it says that only invoice verification (and not logistic invoice verification) is supported for this transaction.
Best regards,
Avishai KaplanHi Avishay,
Logistics Invoice Verification
Logistics Invoice Verification is a part of Materials Management (MM). It is situated at the end of the logistics supply chain that includes Purchasing, Inventory Management, and Invoice Verification. It is in Logistics Invoice Verification that incoming invoices [Seite 11] are verified in terms of their content, prices, and arithmetic. When the invoice is posted, the invoice data is saved in the system. The system updates the data saved in the invoice documents in Materials Management and Financial Accounting.
Logistics Invoice Verification is closely integrated with the components Financial Accounting (FI) and Controlling (CO). It passes on the relevant information about payments or invoice analyses to these components.
Features:
In Materials Management, Logistics Invoice Verification has the following features:
u2022 It completes the material procurement process, which started with the purchase requisition and resulted in a goods receipt.
u2022 It allows invoices that do not originate in materials procurement (such as services, expenses, course costs) to be processed.
u2022 It allows credit memos to be processed, either as invoice reversals or return deliveries.
Invoice Verification
The main aim of invoice verification is to ensure that vendors are paid the correct amount at the right time ( not too late but also not too early ). The process should have a high incidence of fi rst-time matching, to ensure that as little time as possible is spent trying to manually match invoices that appear to be incorrect.it is important to include as few steps as possible in the process, considering that the process of handling payments
does not in itself add value to the company or to the vendor.
Main steps:
The capture of the vendoru2019s invoice details
The matching of those details to the details that we
believe to be correct
The investigation of any mismatches
The release for payment of matched invoices
The accounting entries involved ( including taxes and
delivery costs )
The details recorded for audit purposes
Hope this information helps you out in understanding the differences between the two
I ncase of any further clarification do put a message
In case if this information is of any help to you please do reward accordingly
Thanks & Rewards
Pavan -
Blocking logistic invoice verification at company code level
Dear all,
May I know what is the system setup (SPRO) for this:
Blocking logistic invoice verification at company code level ?
Thanks
tuffyHi There
I think it can be solved in 2 ways,,
1. Number range, if you have not defined for the particular company code for this year,,
2. Authorization for the Comp Code level (Check with your basis team ,, it will be the easieast way to block it for CC level and when ever you want they can just remove the block, (insterad of doing the changes in config, if basis can control the authorization it will be the best way)
Hope it helps,,
Thanks
Senthil -
Logistic Invoice Verification Amt PO Amt
Hi,
During logistic invoice verification(T-code:MIRO), if my PO amt is 100, GR is 100 but my invoice amt is 80, I would like to absorb the other 20 to some other account ratther than to let is auto-posted.
How can I do so? Possible in MIRO?
Thanks,
CWHi,
This is possible,
You have to maintain the material master with Standard price control i.e S.ie the material is valuated at a standard price
A receipt posted to a stock account is generally posted at the standard price. Differences between the order price and the standard price are posted to an Expenses/revenue from price differences account.
n Differences between the invoice price and the order price are posted to an Expenses/revenue from price differences account .
You have to maintain the account determination for Transaction PRD -valuation class (Which is assign to material master)-Req G/L Accounts.
when you maintained the material master by moving average price then for posting the differences bet PO price and Invoice prices ,you must have to issue all the stock material i.e the stock coverage in the company code is smaller than the quantity to be debited or credited.
Rewards if Helpful....
Regards
Sanjay L -
GR/IR Freight Clearing Account - GR & Invoice Verification
Dear Gurus,
I have made a PO for 1200 pcs unit price 69.20$. (GR based IV). (Valuation - Moving average price)
Delivery costs - Freight (FRB1) - 1200$
I have splitted the PO quantity in to 3 different Inbound deliveries
Inbound 1 - 400 pcs
Inbound 2 - 400 pcs
Inbound 3 - 400 pcs
I have made the Goods receipt for the 1st Inbound - 400 pcs.
Goods Receipt 1 - 400 pcs. The value in the GR/IR freight clearing a/c credited by 400$
Invoice Verification1 - 400 pcs. The value in the Invoice verification is 1000$.
The value in the GR/IR freight clearing a/c debited by 1000$
Goods Receipt2 - 400 pcs. The value in the GR/IR freight clearing a/c got credited by 400$
Invoice Verification2 - 400 pcs. The value in the Invoice Verification is 2000$
The value in the GR/IR freight clearing a/c got debited by 200$ and Stock in Hand debited by 1800$
Goods Receipt3 - 400 pcs. The value in the GR/IR freight clearing a/c got credited by 200$
Invoice Verification3 - 400 pcs. The value in the Invoice Verification is 1500$
The value in the GR/IR freight clearing a/c got debited by 133.33$ and Stock in Hand debited by 1366.67$
I don't understand how the logic works for seggreating the amount to GR/IR freight clearing account and GR/IR account.
For the first 2 GR and IV I could understand that there is a balance in the PO condition but for the Invoice verification 3. The value debited to GR/IR freight account is 133.33$. Can anyone help me how the calculation is taking place and how the system has arrived to figure 133.33$ in the Invoice verification for GR/IR freight clearing a/c
Strangely when I have cancelled the Invoice Verification document 3.
The value Credited to GR/IR freight clearing account is 333.33$ instead of 133.33$
Can somebody help me to figure out the calucation for IR after the GR for planned delivery costs.
If any SAP notes or help files can be provided then it would be really helpful.
Regards
Fazal.Refer this note 311496 & 460244, 129066
Symptom
Delivery costs were planned for a purchase order item.
A goods-receipt-based invoice verification is set.
Several goods receipts are posted. For invoice entry, both in conventional invoice verification (transaction MR01/MRHR) and in logistics invoice verification (transaction MR1M/MIRO), the delivery costs for each purchase order item are displayed in total.
This is the same as when, for example, only one of several GR documents/delivery notes is selected.
Example of a purchase order history:
Cat. Doc. no. Itm MvT Pstg.dt. Qty.in BUoM Value in local curr
GR 5200002605 0001 101 June 16, 2000 5 PC 50,00 DEM
GR 5200002606 0001 101 June 16, 2000 5 PC 50,00 DEM
Sum of goods receipts 10 PC 100,00 DEM
DCGR 5200002605 0001 June 16, 2000 5 PC 3,33 DEM
DCGR 5200002605 0001 June 16, 2000 5 PC 5.00 DEM
DCGR 5200002606 0001 June 16, 2000 5 PC 3,33 DEM
DCGR 5200002606 0001 June 16, 2000 5 PC 5.00 DEM
Total delivery cost GR 16,66 DEM
If you only select the first GR document in the selection, you get
the following default values for the delivery costs:
Amount Quantity BUoM Itm Decription Vendor
6,67 10 PC 10 Freight value VEND01
10,00 10 PC 10 Freight/quantity VEND01
(and not, as sometimes expected: - 3,33 DEM 5 PC
- 5,00 DEM 5 PC)
Other terms
WEBRE, delivery costs, planned delivery costs, goods-receipt-based invoice verification, invoice verification
Reason and Prerequisites
A function such as the goods-receipt-based invoice verification is not available for delivery costs.
Solution
This is not an error; this is a consulting note. -
Error message in Logistic Invoice verification.
Hi.
When I am doing Invoice verification with reference to purchase order. I am facing a error message as
"Tax code V1 country IN does not exist in procedure ZAXINN
Message no. FF713
Diagnosis
You entered a tax code, which is not defined for the country of the company code to be posted to in the tax calculation procedure.
System Response
Procedure
Check and, if necessary, correct the entry."
In spite I have assigned the calculation procedure to the country and created the tax code in the transaction code FTXP.
Can any body help me how to resolve this error message. An immediate response would be appreciated.
Cheers
GuruprasadHi Guru,
For This error Pls find out the Folowing.
1)Any Purchase order history is there or not if it is there check previous Tax code.
2)Check Authirization.
3)Check PO tax code and MIGO tax code.
4)Check validity Period.(This is not the reason)
Even Though U maintain all Basic settings, this error is comming in Some time when some GUDBUD.
Pls Check all relate objects then ur Problem will solved.
Thanks,
Raghu -
Special GL posting in Logistic Invoice Verification
Hi..
We want to post / clear down payment / Deduct the amount t to special GL Account. . SAP Standerd not suuport such functionality. Any one using such functionality in LIV (MIRO TRANSACTION).
Need your help / suggestion for same.
Thanks in advance
Thanks
RakeshHi The answer from SAP for your question as follows
It is not possible to post an invoice to a special G/L account in transaction MIRO as the field UMSKZ is not available there.
The reason is, that the field UMSKZ is not available in the runtime structures of the used program in logistics IV and doesn´t exist in the database tables for MM. So if the field would be populated in transaction MIRO it could lead to problems when parking or cancelling an invoice as the field value could not be saved. Furthermore the field could not be filled in automated IV-processes.
The transaction MIRO does not cover all functionalities of the transaction FB60. Its main function is to create invoices with reference to a purchase order where it is normaly not necessary to post a different
reconciliation account.
Regards
Antony -
Tcode: MR8M---Logistic invoice verification'document can't be reversed
Dear Experts.
I have a logistic invoiceverification' document and use tcode:MR8M to reverse it ,but can't be reverseed ,the system issue the wrong information :"No reversal possible. Reverse value must be reset".please tell me how I should do? thanks!
Fanny.Hello Fanny Chen,
In certain situations, the reversal of posting documents may be cancelled with an error. This may, for example, occur in the following situations:
The specified posting date is in a posting period that is already closed.
At the time of the reversal, the posting of the original document had not been completed.
Account assignment objects (for example, cost centers) which were posted to in the original document are closed at the time of the reversal.
Posting items that were created by the original document are already cleared at the time of the reversal (for example to customer and vendor accounts).
In your case it seems that the posting items that were created by original document are already cleared so you need to first reverse the cleared document which the system is trying to mean by saying"No reversal possible, reverse value must be reset.
UNDER THESE CIRCUMSATNCE PROBABLY YOU NEED TO USE THE TRANSACTION FOR WHICH ALL CLEARED DOCUMENT CAN BE RESET AND REVERSE
1) TCODE : FBRA
2) CLEARING DOCUMENT : ENTER THE CLEARED DOCUMENT NUMBER
3) COMPANY CODE : ENTER COMPANY CODE
4) FISCAL YEAR : RELEVANT FISCAL YEAR
5) CLICK THE SAVE BUTTON
6) IN THE NEXT SCREEN CLICK YES
7) THE SYSTEM WILL GIVE ANOTHER MESSAGE BOX WITH THREE OPTIONS :
ONLY RESETTING
RESETTING & REVERSE CLICK ON THIS
CANCEL
8) SELECT THE MIDDLE ONE I.E. RESTTING & REVERSE
9) THE SYSTEM WILL ASK FOR REVERSAL REASON.
10) ENTER 01 AND THEN PRESS ENTER
11) THE SYSTEM WILL RESET THE DOCUMENT
After this resetting is done you can use MR8M Tcode.
Hope I had been able to help you. Please assign points and close the thread.
Rgds
\Manish -
Logistic Invoice Verification - OMR6 vs. Vendor specific tolerance
Hi, a question on the relationship between PP tolerance limit and vendor specific tolerance.
In OMR6 I have defined an upper an lower limit of 5% for a company on PP. In Vendor specific tolerances I have defined a tolerance group with lower 1% and upper 2%. This group is attached to a specific vendor.
The purchase order for this vendor shows an amount of 100 euros. When posting the invoice for this purchase order I enter a purchase price of 102,50 ( so 2,5% difference). I did expect that SAP would issue at least a warning when entering and posting the invoice using the MIRO transaction, however I am able to post the invoice without any warning/error.
Does anyone has a clue why things are not working as expected?
Thx, PaulI did already setup vendor specific tolerances using the path you indicate. Settings are:
On percentage lower limit
Check limit : Checked
PercLowerAccLim : 2%
On percentage upper limit
Check limit : Checked
PercUpperAccLim : 1%
Thx, Paul -
Report Logistic Invoice verification
Hi guys,
is there a standard report which,starting from Invoice receipt number as input field,give me the Goods receipted linked?
I have tried by ME2N,L,M with scope of list 'Alles' but I don't start from Invoice...
thanks
ByeYou can use the table EKBE to retrieve the data you want.
Use the field VGABE (Trans./event type) = 2 for Invoice Receipt and
Enter the Invoice Number on the field BELNR (Material Document) and the year on GJAHR (Material Doc. Year).
Then Execute.
Then you can find the Reference PO Number, PO item number, Material, Posting Date, Ref GR Doc Year (LFGJA), Ref GR Doc Number (LFBNR) and Ref GR Doc Item (LFPOS).
Note: The GR Document number can be seen as reference, only if the invoice was made with reference to the GR Material document number. -
Logistis Invoice Verification(LIV) process
Hi Experts,
Can you please tell me abt the LIV process in details.In my scenario,When an IDOC of type INVOIC02 message type INVL/INVM is successfully posted to SAP system form XI system,it will trigger LIV process.But I dont know how this actually happens and what code i have to write for this interface.
Also provide me some code for this.
Thanks a lot
Regards
KrishanLIV is the process to pay the vendor
once you create the PO, you can receive the GR agianst the PO and than Post the invoice if your PO is GR based IR checked OR
you can Post the invoice before GR also but in this case the GR based IV should not be checked in the PO.
Now this process has nothing to do with ABAP Implementaion.
ABAP can develope for this transction if somthing require for custom logic. -
Downpayment clearing for opentext automatic invoice posting
Hello everyone. My client is using OpenText VIM ( Vendor Invoice Management ) for incoming invoices. VIM automatically triggers FB60 (in case of PO invoice) & MIRO ( In case of PO invoice ). The invoice posting happens automatically in the background which doesn't allow automatic vendor downpayment clearing against these invoices ( done my a 'down payment clearing' push button in normal circumstances in MIRO when posting the invoice manually ). My client doesnt want to use F-54 for downpayment clearing after MIRO. Many of your clients now-a-days would be using automatic invoice posting , how are you guys managing the automatic downpayment process. I would really appreciate any kind of help. Thanks in advance
IN A090 metioned the account under down payment clearing account field.
Maybe you are looking for
-
When I send an imessage on my ipad to someone, my husband also gets the message, even though he was not selected as a receipient. This just started when I got my ipad and sent a message for the first time. As a side note, my daughter received an it
-
Look. I don't care how much time and effort apple put into the creation of iOS 7. If I wanted an Android device, I could've gone out to the store and bought one. iOS 7 ***** ***. I friggin' hate it. It's eating away at my battery and the color scheme
-
Hello All, I've run into a glitch that I can't seem to get out of. I was having some timeline difficulties (playback freezing, etc.), so as I have in the past I closed FCP7 and trashed my preferences. When I went to reopen FCP7, I get to the Final Cu
-
"An error occured during operation" this message comes up when I try to print from the internet
This message comes up when I try to print from the internet...."An error occured during operation" I have to screen print if I want to print anything from internet. Can anyone help with this. Bob
-
hi to all suppose i want to develop my own custom tag for example <mine:while var="abc" items=${x} > </mine:while> so how can i develop this while loop this is exactly same as <c:forEach > loop in standard tag core library. plz give me the coding of