Blocking logistic invoice verification at company code level

Dear all,
May I know what is the system setup (SPRO) for this:
Blocking logistic invoice verification at company code level ?
Thanks
tuffy

Hi There
I think it can be solved in 2 ways,,
1. Number range, if you have not defined for the particular company code for this year,,
2. Authorization for the Comp Code level (Check with your basis team ,, it will be the easieast way to block it for CC level and when ever you want they can just remove the block, (insterad of doing the changes in config, if basis can control the authorization it will be the best way)
Hope it helps,,
Thanks
Senthil

Similar Messages

  • SAP ISU- Can you help on Invoice Rounding steps at company code level,

    Dear Friends,
    Can you help on SAP ISU Invoice Rounding steps at company code level,
    Client requirement is: - for one company code they need round the Invoice and other company codes they does not required the round option.
    We have configured some steps, which are given below,
    Contract Accounts Receivable and Payable - Basic Functions - Postings and Documents
    1.     Define Rounding Rules for Currencies
    2.     Define Accounts for Rounding Differences
    3.     Accounts for Rounding Gross Amounts (IS-U)
    4.     IS-U: Define Acct Assignment Data Relevant to Transactions
    a.     (Main Transaction 0010 and Sub Transaction 0040)
    SAP Utilities u2013 Invoicing
    1.     Define Basic Settings for Invoicing
    2.     Define Invoice Rounding Rules
    Please provide the solution; I will be appreciating for earliest answer...
    Thanks and Regards,
    Prudhvi

    Hello Christiane,
    Thanks for your quick reply, and valuable information,
    But we have u201CNo roundingu201D option available at client level, path has given below, 
    SPRO u2013 SAP Utilities Invoicing u2013 Basic setting u2013 Define Basic setting for invoicing
    We are not authorized to change any configuration at client level,
    If you can able to guide me at company code level that could be great,
    Thanks for the support
    Thanks and Regards,
    Prudhvi

  • Payment block non editable on the basis of company code level

    Dear Gurus,
    we had made payment block "A" non editable in payment praposal through transaction code ob27.as per reqeust from
    our partent company in India but our subsidiary in France wants the payment block "a"  to be editable (to be insert
    payment block "a" in document to make document deselect). Is it possible to make payment block editable on the basis of
    company code level.
    Regards,
    Rajesh

    Hi,
    In this scenario, you need to have a NEW Payment block key like Z. Create Z with reference to A in OB27.
    For Z, you need to select check box Change in Payment Proposal and SAVE.
    Now maintain this Z in vendor masters of company code, where you want the payment block can be edited.
    Note: Payment Block codes are not company code dependent.
    Regards,
    SRinu

  • Blocking Vendors on Company Code level

    Hi,
    Our Purchasing Organization has multiple Company Codes. Is it possible to block certain vendors for a Particular company code without affecting the other company codes which might be using that vendor??
    What exactly we are trying to do is block all future Purchase orders & Requisitions from being created for a list of Vendors for one company code. We do not want it to affect other Company codes within the same Purchasing Org which might be using the same suppliers.
    I know about XK05 but I think it puts a "Purchasing block" at the Purchasing Org level only and not on the Company code level. Is there any way to achieve this??
    Your inputs are really appreciated.

    Hi Martin,
    If you want to Block the Vendor for a Particular Purchase Organization and Company code then Go to XK05 and Select Vendor Pur Org and Comp Code and in Posting Block tab Activate for Selected Company code and in Purchasing Block tab Activate for Selected Purchase Organization and Save.
    Before this you need to set the following to Error.
    SPRO-MM-Purchasing-Environment data-Define attributes for System messages
    ME 023 Vendor & blocked for purchasing organization &
    ME 024 Vendor & flagged for deletion
    ME 025 Vendor & flagged for deletion for purchasing organization &
    For XK05 Message ME 023 would work.
    Regards,
    Nani.

  • Blocking a Tax code at company code level

    Hi
    I want to deactivate/block a tax code at company code level instead of country level.
    Anyone pls help
    Regards

    Hi,
    SPRO-SAP IMG-Logistics - General-Tax on Goods Movements-India-Basic Settings-Determination of Excise Duty-Condition-Based Excise Determination-Assign Tax Code to Company Codes
    Or
    Remove the gl accounts attached in OB40.
    Or
    Remove the calculation percentages in FTXP.
    Hope this is helpful.
    Regards,
    Sankar

  • Number Range for Logistic Documents For Different Company Codes

    Hi all..
    I need to numbered the logistic documents for diferent company codes (#60) but the number ranges for al those documents should be generated separately according to each CC.
    I've read in other thread that I could use the user exit MM06E003, but it seems that only works for PO. There is also a tweak for GR/GI, but..  any idea for all the other documents?
    Thanks in advance.
    Guillermo (Willy)

    Hi
    using the User exit you can change the Numbers Rnage for the LIV Documents based on the Compnay Code
    LMR1M003 Number assignment in Logistics Invoice Verification
    Thanks & Regards
    Kishore

  • Invoice verification and logistic invoice verification

    Hello,
    What is the different between invoice verification and logistic invoice verification?
    My Japanese client need to work with t.code: VXJ2 - customs declaration for import billing documents - Japan
    When i run this report, it finds no data.
    I read the help for this transaction and it says that only invoice verification (and not logistic invoice verification) is supported for this transaction.
    Best regards,
    Avishai Kaplan

    Hi Avishay, 
    Logistics Invoice Verification 
    Logistics Invoice Verification is a part of Materials Management (MM). It is situated at the end of the logistics supply chain that includes Purchasing, Inventory Management, and Invoice Verification. It is in Logistics Invoice Verification that incoming invoices [Seite 11] are verified in terms of their content, prices, and arithmetic. When the invoice is posted, the invoice data is saved in the system. The system updates the data saved in the invoice documents in Materials Management and Financial Accounting.
    Logistics Invoice Verification is closely integrated with the components Financial Accounting (FI) and Controlling (CO). It passes on the relevant information about payments or invoice analyses to these components.
    Features:
    In Materials Management, Logistics Invoice Verification has the following features:
    u2022 It completes the material procurement process, which started with the purchase requisition and resulted in a goods receipt.
    u2022 It allows invoices that do not originate in materials procurement (such as services, expenses, course costs) to be processed.
    u2022 It allows credit memos to be processed, either as invoice reversals or return deliveries.
    Invoice Verification 
    The main aim of invoice verification is to ensure that vendors are paid the correct amount at the right time ( not too late but also not too early ). The process should have a high incidence of fi rst-time matching, to ensure that as little time as possible is spent trying to manually match invoices that appear to be incorrect.it is important to include as few steps as possible in the process, considering that the process of handling payments
    does not in itself add value to the company or to the vendor.
    Main steps: 
    The capture of the vendoru2019s invoice details
      The matching of those details to the details that we
    believe to be correct
      The investigation of any mismatches
      The release for payment of matched invoices
      The accounting entries involved ( including taxes and
    delivery costs )
      The details recorded for audit purposes 
    Hope this information helps you out in understanding the differences  between the two
    I ncase of any further clarification do put a message
    In case if this information is of any help to you please do reward accordingly
    Thanks  & Rewards
    Pavan

  • Logistic Invoice Verification Amt PO Amt

    Hi,
    During logistic invoice verification(T-code:MIRO), if my PO amt is 100, GR is 100 but my invoice amt is 80, I would like to absorb the other 20 to some other account ratther than to let is auto-posted.
    How can I do so? Possible in MIRO?
    Thanks,
    CW

    Hi,
    This is possible,
    You have to maintain the material master with Standard price control i.e S.ie the material is valuated at a standard price
    A receipt posted to a stock account is generally posted at the standard price. Differences between the order price and the standard price are posted to an “Expenses/revenue from price differences” account.
    n Differences between the invoice price and the order price are posted to an “Expenses/revenue from price differences” account .
    You have to maintain the account determination for Transaction PRD -valuation class (Which is assign to material master)-Req G/L Accounts.
    when you maintained the material master by moving average price then for posting the differences bet PO price and Invoice prices ,you must have to issue all the stock material i.e the stock coverage in the company code is smaller than the quantity to be debited or credited.
    Rewards if Helpful....
    Regards
    Sanjay L

  • Manage vendor bank account in company code level - Best practice

    hi,
    we have on our client several company codes, and we are thinking how to manage the vendor bank accounts in company codes level or in centeral level.
    our problem with company codes level is that the vendor bank accounts define in a centeral level so technically with sap standard it is not possible. if anyone can tell me that this is possible i will be very happy to know.
    in centeral level our problem is with the business process because of we do not have a person (functionalism ) that can be responsible for all the company codes, basically every company shoule be responsible for her vendors
    please advice what is the best practice to manage vendor bank accounts in enviroment of several company code
    regards,
    meir

    hi Raghu,
    i know that but this is not my qusition.
    which company code will be responsible to enter the bank account in the vendor master data? as i say the vendor bank accounts manage in centeral level and not in company code level and this is our problem and i like to know how other companies with the same situation handle with this issue
    and also after we have the bank accounts in the vendor master data what happend if for one vendor has several bank accounts one for every company code? how the payment program F110 could know automaticaly which bank account to take (i know that there is an optoin to use Partner bank type in the vendor master data, and enter this PBT when posting the invoice of the vednor, but this is not good because of we do not want the the accountant will be responsible from which bank the vendor get his money).
    regards,
    meir

  • Vendor invoice and logistic invoice verification ?

    Good morning Guru,
    What is the difference between  "vendor invoice" in accounting module and "logistic invoice verification"  in MM module ?
    I know logistic invoice verification to validate between po, gr and invoice, but what vendor invoice for ?
    Thank's

    Hi
    Accounting-wise both has the same result as in both the scenarios you can debit expense and credit vendor. The advantage of Logistics Invoice Verification over Vendor Invoice is, in Logistics Invoice verification, we have three way matching of documents ie PO,GR and Invoice. So if there is any mismatch between these, the invoice will get blocked for payment. Also it checks for accuracy between PO and invoice and GR and invoice, so that the expenses are accounted accurately and price diff account also effected appropriately.
    In Vendor invoice booking, it is just like your normal journal entry and so it has not got that much authenticity over the correctness of transactions. In vendor invoice booking, there is every possibility of duplicate booking of invoice, whereas in LIV, the invoice will get blocked for payment.
    Hope it is clear.
    Regards,
    K Lakshmanan

  • MIRO number range tobe  separated at company code level

    Hi All,
    Can anybody tell me how to separate MIRO number range at Company code level. We have 3 company codes in the same client. Cant we have different company codes for 3 of them. If yes, where to do the required

    Hi
    Refer the below post
    Different No Range for invoice document no(MIRO) - company code wise.
    Thanks !
    E.Avudaiappan

  • Release Strategy @ Company Code Level

    Hi Guys:
    We have a two plants under one compant code, when we issue PO to the vendor it consists quantities that are required for both plants ( Central purchasing org).
    Release strategy for PO is at header level , I.e Total PO Value can we release strategy @ company code Level?
    with Characteristics as Company Code ,PO Document Type and PO Value?
    Thanks
    Sweth

    Hi
    For example if the release strategy set at c.code level all the documents created for several plants belonging to the c.code will affect the release strategy,so that is not the purpose of release strategy,
    The main purpose of release strategy is certain documents created for particular plant or particular purchasing group or more than the value need to be blocked based on your business,so you cant able to set the release at c.code level because thre is no logic.
    The characteristics for release strategy for external purchasing documents are
    Plant                - WERKS
    Pur.group        - EKGRP
    Pur.org            -EKORG
    Acc.assignment category-KNTTP
    Document value-GNETW
    Document type-BSART
    The table is CEKKO
    Thanks

  • Block Sensitive field basd on Company Code

    Dear Experts ,
    We are blocking sensitive fields using the Customizing Setting in SPRO
    SPRO –> REF IMG –> Financial Accounting –> Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable –> Vendors Accounts –> Mast*er Data –> Preparations for Creating Vendor Master Data –> Define Sensitive Fields for Dual Control (Vendors)
    Currently its is blokcing for all the Company Codes
    Can we include a Check that it will block only a specific Company Code ...
    We had cheked all the forums but unable to get the satisfactorily answers for the same.
    Regards,
    Saurabh Goel

    Hi,
    Sensitive fields effects at company code level and cannot be separated.
    You have two options; one is to use user-exit ZXF05U01 in order to block some vendors another one is to customize sensitive fields and approve those vendors which you don’t want to be blocked by coding.
    Best regards
    Melih

  • Blocking the invoice verification

    Hi Friends!
    My client wants to block the invoice verification (MIRO) if the material is under quality stock. Till the usage decision is not done invoice verification should not be allowed against that PO.
    Pl. Help
    Regards
    Naveen

    Hi,
    If you want GR to be blocked unless QA clears the material i.e. MIRO should be done only when Inspection lot qty is posted to Unrestricted use stock, then i am afraid it can be done only with an user exit
    only prerequisite being creation of inspection lot for GR
    way to block MIRO before UD posting is done is thru an enhancement
    LMR1M001
    Here you need to post following code to block MIRO in include:ZXM08U16
    this code will cause an error message before UD and will allow MIRO for only qty posted to Unrestricted stock
    *& Include ZXM08U16
    Declaration of variables
    DATA: w_prueflos TYPE qamb-prueflos,
    w_lmenge TYPE qals-lmenge01.
    Declaration of Internal Tables
    DATA: itab LIKE qals OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE.
    LOOP AT e_tdrseg WHERE selkz EQ 'X'.
    Checking whether the document require Inspection
    CLEAR: w_prueflos.
    SELECT SINGLE prueflos
    INTO w_prueflos
    FROM qamb
    WHERE mblnr = e_tdrseg-lfbnr
    AND zeile = e_tdrseg-lfpos.
    IF sy-subrc EQ 0.
    CLEAR: itab[], itab.
    SELECT SINGLE * INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF itab
    FROM qals
    WHERE prueflos = w_prueflos
    AND stat35 = 'X'.
    IF sy-subrc EQ 0.
    READ TABLE itab INDEX 1.
    CLEAR: w_lmenge.
    Sum of quantity (Excludes Block stock)
    w_lmenge = itab-lmenge01.
    IF e_tdrseg-menge GT w_lmenge.
    MESSAGE ID 'ZMM' TYPE 'E' NUMBER '004' WITH w_lmenge e_tdrseg-lfbnr.
    ENDIF.
    ELSE.
    MESSAGE ID 'ZMM' TYPE 'E' NUMBER '005' WITH e_tdrseg-lfbnr.
    ENDIF.
    ENDIF.
    ENDLOOP.
    Hope this helps
    Regards
    Dheeraj...

  • F.01 - extract to consolidation on company code level

    Hi everyone
    We're trying to do an extract to consolidation on company code level (1). When popup dialog "Filename for extraction file" appears we can choose between presentation server or application server.
    When choosing presentation server and logical filename ECCS_FILE we get error GC027 (Error opening file c:\temp\EXTRACT_CS_CO.txt).
    Doing so choosing application server however works (whereas path isn't the same).
    We already checked and double-checked settings of logical file name and logical path in transaction FILE.
    Any suggestions what to do or isn't it supposed to work via presentation server?
    Thanks in advance and best regards to all
    Renaud

    I have not seen anything that you have mentioned to enter file path?
    Is this being customised for your Company?
    How did you download this before?

Maybe you are looking for

  • How can I reference the parent, without using _parent or _root?

    I cannot use the following in my ActionScript due to conflicts with the host application: _level0 _root _parent references On a pop-up box I have a close button with an absolute reference: closeBtn.onRelease = function  () { unloadMovie("_level0.Page

  • OS X and Windows SMB home folders=SLOW

    Okay, Here's the rundown of our mac lab setup: 14 Mac minis (late 2006, newly imaged with Mavericks and Office 2011) 2 DNS/AD DC's (dc1.domain.local - Windows 2003R2, dc2.domain.local - Windows 2008R2) A 3rd Windows 2003R2 server (fs1.domain.local) u

  • [NEW] [IMAGES] Adding the ability to preview/live edit the source code.

    If the Muse Team added this, they could relax and not worry about adding so many other features. Sure, you can do this already in your browser. But it's not really a dynamically edit thing. Here, let me demonstrate. You could naviagate (or shortcut)

  • Vendor Change Authorization

    Client requires that" user will make a Change request to the Approved Person to change the vendor Address. Means the step will be as follows 1. user will create a request to change the address details in SAP. 2. Person having the authorization will c

  • How do I enable "copy-paste" buttons, editing a private wed site?

    I'm a school teacher. My school has a web site. I'm the site manager. The site has installed a basic editor to write articles with. The "copy- paste" buttons don't work and the following message appears "Copy/Cut/Paste is not available in Mozilla and