DPI vs PPI - a definitive answer?

I've looked back at some previous discussions of the DPI setting in Aperture, and I've also read some online explanations of DPI vs PPI. Apparently software applications sometimes confuse the two, and I suspect that this is the case with Aperture but I haven't seen this definitely specified. Photography competitions that ask for high-res files often ask that you use 300 PPI (not DPI); but previous discussions of Aperture suggest that the DPI option (there isn't a PPI option) should be set to 300 for high-res exports. In other words, Aperture seems to refer to DPI when it should be referring to PPI. Is this correct?

LondonDave wrote:
Photography competitions that ask for high-res files often ask that you use 300 PPI (not DPI); but previous discussions of Aperture suggest that the DPI option (there isn't a PPI option) should be set to 300 for high-res exports.
PPI and DPI are often incorrectly used interchangeably but most of the time the improper usage does not hurt anything. However IMO we should ourselves endeavor to use the terms properly. Aperture uses the dpi term correctly because it is referring to an output device.
Much of the time "photography competitions" are just stealing your image one way or another, so the image spec is just to get it into the form they want to harvest. <OK I am a cynic...>
When the contest spec is making sense usually it is just specifying linear size (inches or centimeters) x ppi (like 300 ppi) to achieve consistent linear pixel dimensions, which are what really matter. So if they want to harvest what would be typical 8x10 print quality image files they specify 8" x 10" at 300 ppi: the important net result is that every contestant provides a (8x300) x (10x300) = 2400 pixels x 3000 pixels file.
Or they could specify 24" x 30" at 100 ppi: net result (24x100) x (30x100) = 2400 pixels x 3000 pixels file.
Or maybe it is a size-righteous competition, in which size as viewed matters. After all, we all know some pix show well small while others demand large presentation. In that case they may only specify the ppi. The photog determines the presentation size. E.g. 300 ppi is specified and one wants to present at 4" x 4" it would be a 1200 pixels by 1200 pixels image submission.
-Allen

Similar Messages

I want to cut and paste iCal entries on iPad. Have seen a number of questions raised but no definitive answer - is it possible or not? (I use Bento but that doesn't sync with ICal now so can use that solution)

I want to cut and paste iCal entries on iPad. Have seen a number of questions raised but no definitive answer - is it possible or not?
(I use Bento but that doesn't sync with ICal now so can use that solution)
Hope to hear helpful news soon....
C

No, the camera connection kit only supports the copying of photos and videos to the Photos app, it doesn't support copying content off the iPad. For your second camera instead of the SD reader part of the kit, does the iPad to camera cable not work with it for direct transfer to the iPad ?
For Lightroom and Nikon software again no - you can only install apps that are available in the iTunes app store on your computer and the App Store app on the iPad, 'normal' PC and Mac (OS X) software are not compatible with the iPad (iOS). There are some apps that perform fairly basic editing functions that are available in the store, but nothing as sophisticated as, for example, Lightroom.

Sending chinese HTML with javamail - is there no definitive answer ?

I'm using the following code to send a HTML and text e-mail
(text for people with HTML-challenged email clients). I sent
2 emails to 2 email addresses which reside on the same server
- eg. [email protected] and [email protected] - and read the
emails with the same e-mail client (Eudora) on the same PC.
The HTML and Chinese displays perfectly when it's sent to one
of the email addresses ([email protected]) but the HTML and
Chinese are always corrupt when I send them to the other.
This is a repeatable error and it has me completely stumped.
     // Example Initial values (drawn from a database) :
     String smtpHost = "mail.mydomain.com";
     String sender = "[email protected]";
     String subject = "Give me strength.... ";
     InternetAddress sender = new InternetAddress("[email protected]");
     InternetAddress receiver = new InternetAddress("[email protected]");
     String txtMsg = "a long text message blah...";
     String htmlMsg = "<h1>Wooo</h1><img src='http://mydomain.com/blink.gif'>";
     String language = "zh-tw" // can also be "en-us" or "zh-cn"
     // CREATE MAIL MESSAGE & HEADERS
     Properties props = System.getProperties();
     props.put("mail.smtp.host", smtpHost);
     Session session = Session.getDefaultInstance(props, null);
     Message msg = new MimeMessage(session);
     msg.setFrom(sender);
     msg.addRecipient(Message.RecipientType.TO, receiver);
     msg.setSubject(subject);
     msg.setSentDate(new Date());
     msg.setHeader("Mime-Version" , "1.0" );
     msg.setHeader("Content-Transfer-Encoding", "quoted-printable");
     // MESSAGE BODY - TEXT & HTML
     MimeMultipart mimeAllContent = new MimeMultipart("alternative");
     MimeBodyPart mimeText = new MimeBodyPart();
     MimeBodyPart mimeHtml = new MimeBodyPart();
     mimeText.setText(textMsg);
     mimeText.setHeader("Mime-Version" , "1.0" );
     mimeText.setHeader("Content-Type" , "text/plain");
     mimeText.addHeader("Content-Type", "charset=UTF-8");
     if (!language.equals("")) {
          mimeText.setHeader("Content-Language", language);
     mimeText.setHeader("Content-Transfer-Encoding", "quoted-printable");
     mimeHtml.setContent(htmlMsg, "text/html");
     mimeHtml.setHeader("Mime-Version" , "1.0" );
     mimeHtml.setHeader("Content-Type" , "text/html");
     mimeHtml.addHeader("Content-Type", "charset=UTF-8");
     if (!language.equals("")) {
          mimeHtml.setHeader("Content-Language", language);
     mimeHtml.setHeader("Content-Transfer-Encoding", "quoted-printable");
     mimeAllContent.addBodyPart(mimeText);
     mimeAllContent.addBodyPart(mimeHtml);
     msg.setContent(mimeAllContent);
     msg.setHeader("Content-Type" , mimeAllContent.getContentType());
     // SEND THE MESSAGE
     msg.saveChanges();
     Transport.send(msg);
     return true;
Let me repeat - Using the code below, a HTML & Text ("Alternative"
MimeMultiPart) message is sent, and arrives at the recipient's
mailbox. When it is sent to one user ([email protected]), it never
renders properly. When it is sent to another ([email protected]), it's
OK. The destination server, email client, PC are the same in both
cases and the only variable is the recipient's email address.
How can this be ?
I think I've gone overboard by setting the Content-Transfer-Encoding
for both the HTML and Text MimeParts as well as the actual Message.
Could somebody please confirm which parts I should set the Content-
-Language, Content-Transfer-Encoding and Content-Type b/c I'm
going in circles at the moment.
Thanks indeed, to anybody who has experience sending doublebyte
with Javamail and can help me clear this up once and for all.
I find it incredible that after 3 years, there is still no
definitive answer to accomplishing this, and it remains an
elusive black art.
Regards,
chas
ps. The data being sent is in MySQL not that that matters at all.

Try adding code to validate submitted email addresses before they go into your database.
String emailAddress = (from where ever)
if(emailAddress != null) emailAddress = emailAddress.trim();
if(emailAddress == null) // skip this address
// I also check for a list of illegal internet email address characters, as I think the email addresses allowed by Javamail are too lenient.

Ok. can any one tell me: will Final Cut Pro 6 fcs2 bundle) install on my GeForce 6600 LE Video Card on my G5 powerpc dual core 2.0? Thanks Much to anyone who can give me a definitive answer. also if not any fix aka .plist?

ok. can any one tell me: will Final Cut Pro 6 (fcs2 bundle) install on my GeForce 6600 LE Video Card on my G5 powerpc dual core 2.0? Thanks Much to anyone who can give me a definitive answer. also if not any fix aka .plist?

Look at this technical specs document, your system should be fine with the possible exception of Color.
As for managing your preference files, use Digital Rebellion's tool.
Good luck.
Russ

Definitive answer? Touch apps on the Nexus 7

Hello,
I've been searching around now for a while but have not come to a definitive conclusion and would hate to waste my money on something that doesnt do the job.
Some posts on here feature people complaining about the lack of support for the nexus 7, however the following video suggests Photoshop touch works on the device.
Also, the following article suggests all touch apps work on the Nexus 7:
http://robertoblake.com/blog/2012/07/google-nexus-7-will-change-graphic-design/
I would really appreciate it if somebody could please offer up a definitive answer to the compatability of these touch apps on the Nexus 7 and hopefully you can help prevent me from wasting any money :-).
Many thanks,
James

Hi David,
Thanks for getting back to me.
Do you know if Adobe would be happy for users to test the other software on their (currently) unsupported devices for the purposes of beta testing?
It would be nice to see them supported at a later date and I would be happy to trial the software and provide feedback.
Kind regards,
James

What's the definitive answer ?

I have a question which I'm sure has been asked but I cant seem to find it. I have 12" PB G4, 1.5GHz. I have order iLife 08 but in reading the discussion boards I'm not sure it will work. Some say it will ,other say there is a work around for imovie. others say return
So, here's the questions:
Will imovie be the only issue?
If so, Can I still use imovie 06?
Should I just return it ?
What's the definitive answer ?
Thanks

Sounds like you've seen a few posts on this, but I'll confirm what I know, which does not include a work around for iMovie'08:
I installed iLife'08 and iWork'08 on three machines last night.
iMovie'08 would not even try to install on our G-4, 1.25gHz, the line item and check box were always grayed out. iLife'08 did not bother my existing iMovie'04, or '05, and installed the other components fine.
The G-5 and Intel machines both loaded everything fine.
Joe

HT4060 I can't find a definite answer anywhere regarding whether or not you need to turn the iPad mini off before charging. So my question is should I turn the iPad mini off or leave it on before charging? Thanks in advance.

I can't find a definite answer anywhere regarding whether or not you need to turn the iPad mini off before charging. So my question is should I turn the iPad mini off or leave it on before charging? Thanks in advance.

I rarely if ever turn my iPad off. I charge it when the battery is low or at night while I'm sleeping. Even then I close the Smart Cover and let it sleep but I do not turn it off. It doesn't matter when you charge the iPad.
The most efficient way to charge the iPad is to use the charger that came with it and plug that into a known good wall outlet.

DO WE HAVE A DEFINITIVE ANSWER ON WHEN OUR AP ASSOCIATED PRESS WIDGET WHEN WILL IT BE RESTORED

SINCE MARCH THE AP WIDGET HAS BEEN OUT OF SERVICE. ARE WE EVER GOING TO GET IT BACK?  MY ZIPCODE is 08879.
PLEASE JUST GIVE US (CUSTOMERS A DEFINITIVE ANSWER WE AT LEAST DESERVE TO KNOW.
I FIND IT HARD TO BELIEVE IT TAKES OVER 2 MONTHS TO UPGRADE THIS SERVICE. THIS IS A VERY VALUED SERVICE TO ALL CUSTOMERS.   I WILL NOT CONSIDER THIS ISSUE RESOLVED UNTIL ALL CUSTOMERS GET THE AP WIDGET BACK IN SERVICE. PLEASE PASS THIS MESSAGE ON TO MANAGEMENT.
THANK YOU.
Solved!
Go to Solution.

I have called verizon tech support, etc. numerous times regarding this issue to get an answer. Unfortunately I just get bounced around to different departments and put on hold for a long time or disconnected and no one can give me a definitive answer. Otherwise I would not continue to post on this forum regarding this issue.
An Answer to all of your Customers regarding this issue would be nice either Yes or No. Someone must have an answer At Verizon. Check with Your Management Team or that particular Technical Department and let your Customers know either Yes it's coming back or No. This was an Exceptional Service that all of your Customers Valued.
Thanking you in advance.

I-pod touch checking email (definite answer)

Sorry to keep bringing this up, but has anybody had succes using the i-pod touch to log into an microsoft outlook web exchange server to check email? I have gotten it to prompt me for user name and password, but it never actually logs onto the web page.
Does anybody know if this is something that would work with the i-phone using wi-fi?
I am debating weather or not to take my i-touch back and get the iphone and just not use the phone features. However the extra 8 GB in the i-touch is nice.
I am also wondering if anybody has a definite answer on this.
Thanks
Jamie

Not even .Mac members can access their mail over the internet.
Prof.

DPI and PPI in Aperture 'Export' and 'Print' windows

Hi,
As mentioned in an earlier post, I just bought an Epson 3880 printer and some Epson Hot Press paper, so now I have to pay attention to PPI (term used for displays) and DPI (term used for printers).
In Aperture however, files being exported require DPI specs(!), while files being printed require that we specify PPI specs. How is that?
Also, my Epson manual indicates that I can print at 5 distinct "DPI" settings, from 180 to 2880. My Aperture Print window, however, only offers 3 options with 360 "PPI" as the highest (considered Draft quality by Epson - if "DPI"), plus a 4th referred to as Custom.
Also, I have a note jotted down a while back that says: "1440 dpi for most papers with 240 dpi files, at 2880 if 360" - whatever that meant 6 months ago at an Epson 3880 seminar, before I got the printer.
Can you guys sort this out for me? Please?
Thanks a lot,
Raphael

I'm not at my studio. My current driver is 8.x. The newest driver is 9.33. My remarks here may not fit with your more current version of the driver (but that would surprise me — the printer came out about 4 years ago, iirc).
The profiles are not, afaik, included with the driver, at least when you download it from Epson's site.
There are two profiles for each Epson Fine Art paper — one at 1440 and one at 2880. You should try each with every kind of print you make, and determine which is better. IME, _for my needs_, 2880 was never worse. I use the 2880 profiles.
The profile is selected from the "Color Profile" drop-down at the top of the "Rendering" section of Aperture's "Print" dialog.
(Set "Render Intent" to "Perceptual" for, in general, photographs or anything with smoothly graduated changes in color. Set "Render Intent" to "Relative Colorimetric" for, in general, graphics or anything with smooth areas of constant color and sharp transitions between areas of color. Generally, if "Render Intent" is "Perceptual", check "Black Point Compensation"; otherwise uncheck it.)
Leave "Print Resolution" at "Auto". I know of no reason to ever change this. (I don't, in fact, know what this control does, and have never changed it.)
When you click "Print" in Aperture's "Print" dialog, a short dialog opens asking you if you want to save any changes you made to your Preset. I always save my changes. Prints often need to be immediately remade — all transitions of data from electronic to physical media are problematic — and I like to return to my Preset ready to print the same Image(s) again.
When that dialog closes, the OS print dialog opens. Your 3880 printer should already be selected in the "Printer" drop-down. You need to create and should save an OS Preset for your paper. Note that on the "Color Matching" page (this dialog has pages, not tabs; direct complaints to Cupertino), all (two) options should be grayed-out. This indicates that Aperture is handling color matching, which is what you want (for best prints and anything approaching a color-calibrated workflow). On the "Paper Handling" page, the "Destination Paper Size" drop-down is grayed-out, but should show you the selection you made in the Aperture Print dialog. The "Printer Settings" page has two tabs. On the "Basic" tab, in the "Media Type" drop-down, select your paper ("Fine Art Paper ▹ Hot Press [Bright or Natural])*. The "Ink" drop-down should be grayed-out, but show "Matte". Matte is proper selection for Hot Press [Bright or Natural]. This dialog knows this from your color profile selection in the Aperture Print dialog. Chose "16-bit" output and any other options your want (you can experiment; I find no difference). I ignore the warning about print quality at the bottom area — this has never been an issue. On the "Advanced" tab of the "Printer Settings" page, it should tell you that "Epson Driver Color Management is Off". That's what you want. You want Aperture to manage the color.
Save your OS print dialog Preset. Use it every time you print to the same paper.
*If you cannot select your paper, you have not selected the correct paper size in the "Printer" section of Aperture's Print dialog. Note that the "Paper Size" selection includes not only the paper size, but also whether the feed is by sheet-feeder or manual, and whether or not the print is borderless. (I didn't design this; I assume there are reasons to have shoe-horned these options into the "Paper Size" selection.
This is all tricky on top of being actually complex and next to being new. It takes everyone time and mistakes (read: ink and paper) to canalize a flow that works for producing the prints they want. I hope this gets you there a little faster. Report back with what doesn't work.
—Kirby.

DPI or PPI

Hello Adobe,
In Photoshop, under Image > Image Size, the resolution is labelled ppi, pixels per inch. This is correct.
In Bridge, with metadata showing, the label says dpi. This is not correct.
Could we fix this?
Mike Witherell in Washington DC

Thanks for you feedback. You wish has been granted. Check out the free beta of Bridge CS3 (http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/photoshopcs3/)
Cheers,
Arno.
Bridge Engineering Manager, Adobe.

DPI or PPI during cropping?

Is there a way to get a readout of the PPI or DPI in real time during cropping?
Regards,
David

"Set one of them that you prefer to either cropped dimensions or megapixels."
Yes, that shows the info I often need to see when cropping, but shouldn't there be something approaching instant feedback showing latest cropped dimensions (as in Photoshop)? On my Mac G4 1.47GHz (dual processor with 2 Gb RAM), LR seems to require approx 10 seconds before updating the info display to show current cropped dimensions. Is this typical? That's painfully slow feedback and makes cropping to a fixed pixel dimension a very tedious process.
Phil

A definitive answer? : Can you use Audition on a Mac??!

I have heard all sorts of conflicting views on this and I thought someone here would be able to set the record straight! I wanted to get a Mac, because I like them, but I use Audition all the time for my work. Is a Mac a good idea? If not, could anyone recommend the best sort of laptop to get if you're going to be doing a lot of audio editing (for radio).
Thanks a lot!
Rachel

Hey - I've just signed up to get the benefit of the experience & wisdom of audio experts. It looks like I can expect plenty of that so thank you in advance.
From this thread, seems like I can also get some opinion without much basis in fact and outright paranioa too. Just an observation and not a criticism - I have my own foibles to bring to the party too ;-)
here's some facts from me.
I run and work in an environment of mixed Windows and Macs - initially, around 30 Windows audio workstations and a handful of Macs. I've been here since the days of analogue tape; my first audio editor was Cool Edit on Windows 3.11.
The cheaper purchase price of the Win machines is soon offest by the much higher cost of maintenance, repair and replacement. Windows workstations need replacing after 3 years - some of them will have broken beyond repair in that time. The Macs are on a five year replacement program - but they often run longer than that. Yes, Macs break down but nowhere near as much as the Win PCs. This is true for towers and laptops. I refuse to buy any more Win laptops as even the best brands fail so quickly. I now by mac laptops and often they're used in Windows only. Last year we replaced 20 Win workstations with dual boot Macs so we now use both OS's side by side. We only still run Windows because Audition is our audio tool of choice.
Macs do not get viruses. Period. We have no virus or malware protection measures on the Mac side and we have no problems. Zero. We've had massive virus issues on the Windows side, particularly spread by USB memory sticks. With later versions of XP and now 7, it's got a lot better but we still have to run extra software (that slows down performance) on Windows and spend a lot of time updating definitions etc.This is a high cost and should be factored into cost considerations.
Macs are suspecptible to trojans of course - but not as much as Win. There are simply fewer of them and the OS is implemented in an inherently more secure way. That said, if some plonker is going to open dodgy email attachments or going clicking around 'exotic' websites, then they are effectively inviting the vampire over the threshold- whatever the OS and hardware! But Macs do not 'catch' viruses like Windows.
I've been running Audition on my Mac laptops for years under emulation and straight Windows - since Windows 98 SP2. I'm writing this on a five year old MacBook Pro - it's a laptop and it gets hammered and carried everywhere daily in a tatty padded bag. On it I run Audition 1.5 under Parallels (XP), happily getting sound in and out, using a variety of internal and external sound cards (FW & USB). There was once a problem with an M-Audio driver but it was fixed next update and none since. As it's one of the earliest ones, it's maxed out at 2GB RAM and it has the standard 5200 rpm hard drive & 2.16 Core Duo (note: mine's not a Core 2 Duo, which is the current spec and much faster), so you can see it's way below the current models' spec. If I'm doing a big project in Audition with lots of resources running, I use a dedicated modern desktop computer, but for my day in,day out work, my old laptop copes well. I tried Audition 3 on it and it seemed to work ok but the licence was for another machine so I didn't test it in anger. Two people I know with recent Macbook Pros run Windows & Mac OS together and I'm amazed at the ease and speed of them. When my employer allows me, I hope to upgrade to one of those but as long as this old faithful keeps going, I've no chance.
If I had my personal choice it would be Mac all the way - not because it's perfect, but cos it's the better option. But I know and work with people whose knowledge and experience I respect who think the same about Windows. We get on well together.
BTW, the information from someone about one button mouses is a decade or more out of date. With my mac I use the trackpad (which gets 'right-clicks' & more) and often a two button+scroll wheel Microsoft mouse. If we're going to help each other out today, lets not talk ancient history.
I'm about to make more purchases for streaming audio on the web. I'll be installing Audition on these, of course. I'll probably be buying Windows computers to do this because the start budget is too small. But I'll expect to be replacing these in a couple of years and I know from experiecne they'll be less reliable than a Mac tower that would cost almost twice as much. That's a false economy and false efficiency in my view, but it's a strategic choice and it will work well till it breaks.
To summarize, so far I've found no perfect solutions to computer based audio issues - all setups will have their problems. But it is both possible - and to me prefereable - to run Audition on current Macs. And while the initial purchase price of Mac options looks expensive, the total cost of ownership is probably at least equal if not less - but the experience along the way is much less troublesome, more productive and happier.
Enjoy your audio editing whatever it's on.
SnubberD

Best webcam / camera for iChat - definitive answer?

So,
loving my iChat with iSight, I need to get a friend a camera to use with their Mac Pro (2007) / Leopard to communicate with us; and of course, not having the luxury of iSight to purchase anymore, is there a definitive 'best' camera to buy that works 'flawlessly' with iChat ?
I liked the Quickcam 9000 per spec, but it looks like people have a lot of problems with it (5 frames a second is not acceptable). Is there a better / more reliable option?
Thanks,
Dan

Hello Dan
Because of system configurations and other possible webcam uses, what it "better / more reliable" for one may not be for you.
Your Leopard equipped Mac Pro can use any of the suggestions offered in this post:
http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=5725045&#5725045
For lowest cost, best picture, and great zoom capability, (albeit with less convenience than a webcam.) I suggest you use your Mac compatible Firewire-equipped DV camcorder if you have one. The only possible problem I know with Firewire connected cameras is possible hardware or software conflicts for some of us.
A UVC cam will avoid that problems with your Firewire ports. However, understand that every USB device that shares one of your Mac Pro's USB channels also shares its bandwidth. Therefore, you will get best performance from a UVC webcam if you disconnect other devices from the channel that your UVC cam is using while you perform your video tasks.
I started with my DV Camcorder, but I have been using my old Rev A iSight since I got it about four years ago. Therefore, if you want actual users' experiences with USB webcams, we will need to await input from others.
EZ Jim
PowerBook 1.67 GHz w/Mac OS X (10.4.11) G5 DP 1.8 w/Mac OS X (10.5.2) External iSight

Compressor and dissolves -- a definitive answer?

I’ve been reading through many online forums, and although I see this problem posted often, I have yet to read a well-informed answer. Most of the solutions are based on guesswork or contradictory answers. To begin with, I am using FCP 4.5, OS X 3.9, Compressor 2, and DVDSP 3.0.2, and like many people I’m surprised by how poorly mpeg-2 encoding from Compressor renders fades to black and dissolves. I’m basically going from an edit in FCP to compressor and then to DVDSP.
I could be more specific in how I am editing my project, but I’ve seen this problem apply to progressive, interlaced, NTSC, and PAL projects. It also seems to apply to projects that are exported directly from the timeline, and to those that go through an extra quicktime step. Also, this problem has nothing to do with upgrades (I have a clean install, and keep my updates, well, updated).
Some folks blame compressor, while others blame mpeg-2 in general. It seems to me that it cannot be mpeg-2, because thousands of DVDs are produced every year with near-perfect fades, so the problem must lie somewhere in the software.
Is there any definitive source as to how to produce reasonable fade in mpeg-2 (book, forum, online tutorial)? It seems strange no one has nailed this down in any forum.
Much thanks.
Dual 2 Ghz Power Mac G5 Mac OS X (10.3.9)

On 1 - 1.5s duration dip to color (black) transitions
in FCP I find the results with Compressor v1.2.1 to
be v. good - that is to say no blockiness and a
professional result to the level of supplying DVD to
clients who express satisfaction.
Apart from C v.2 and OSX I use the same ver. of Apps
as you - I suspect the C v2 is the culprit. Have you
tried going back to 1.2.1 to see if the problem
persists?
I'd like to go back to Compressor 1.2.1 because that worked fine. But I'm having difficulty installing it. When I used the DVD Studio 3 install DVD, and try to install just Compressor (DVD Studio 3 is still on the hard drive in a "Previous Version" folder), it seems to install but never shows up. And when I try to install both Compressor AND DVD Studio Pro 3, it says the installation was successful, but NO Compressor appears in the Applications folder.
Any suggestions?
Thanks,
Brad

DPI vs PPI - a definitive answer?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for