DPS 6.3.1 substring search limit?

In my DPS I have a resource limit enabled that restricts substring search size to 3 characters. However I have a unique search filter that is getting through. Example below. Any tips on how to enforce the substring search limit I have applied, or is the search too complex, or is this a bug and DPS should stop these anyway? Thanks.
scope=1 filter="(&(!(businessemail=N))(|(|(cn=m*)(cn=* m*))(|(mail=m*)(mail=* m*))))"

This is a known bug:
6417166 Resource limit policy's minimum-search-filter-substring-length doesn't work
Please log a support case and you can obtain a hotfix. It's fixed in DSEE 7.0

Similar Messages

WebHelp Pro and FlashHelp Pro not allowing Substring Search?

The parameter to enable the substring search is not showing up in the Webhelp Pro or FlashHelp Pro output format?
I read through the Adobe help file and it states that it should be there. We are trying out the RoboServer and am finding out that search results are not that accurate. I have switched from server side to client side with no real changes.
Thank you.
JC

When you report a problem you should always try to include as much relevant information as possible. Saying "it doesn't work, help me!" is not very helpful to us, because there could be a million reasons for it not working... What exactly happens when you try to convert a PDF to Word? Are there any error messages? How exactly are you trying to do it? Also, what operating system do you use? What version of Word? What exactly version of Acrobat? etc.

Substring search in HtmlHelp?

Hello again!
Is it possible to enable the substring search in HtmlHelp? If so: how?
Or is there any other possibility to show the topics "Standardeinstellungen", "Sondereinstellungen" and "Einstellungen" if somebody searches for "Einstellungen"?
Janine

Hi, Janine,
Yes, you can locate all three terms by entering the following in the "Type in the keyword to find" box on the Search tab:
*einstellungen
Here, the asterisk is a wildcard character that stands for zero or more characters.
The following page provides more information on the use of wildcards and describes other advanced search facilities that are available in HTML Help files:
http://helpware.net/htmlhelp/hhfindingtext.htm
If you want to give your users instructions on how to conduct effective searches, you can obtain a file called "ViewHlp.chm" from the Microsoft site, decompile it, and include the appropriate topics in your own Help file. You can get the ViewHlp.chm file from here:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms669985(VS.85).aspx
Pete

Substring search with Oracle context indexes

Hi,
i would like to know if it is possibile to do a substring search with one of the obtion offer with the context indexes.
(ctxcat,ctxrule,context)
example:
i would like to search the word 'berub' in a column A in table_example.
the value in the column a are :
The betther
berube
A.berube
berub
Berub
BERUB
R berube
S tartif
Y Thibeault
the rows return should be :
berube
A.berube
berub
Berub
BERUB
R berube
A simple sql could be
select * from table_example where upper(a) like upper('%berub%' );
How i can do this same action with the context indexes and a select (catsearch, contains, matches), if it is possible?
A example will be welcome
Thanks

I know how to do explain plan.
my point is not the query i post, it's just a example.
I have many query on my production we optimize many times (they past from 3min to 15 sec with optimisation, but we want to have better result). At this point we are looking to implant the context indexes to make them more efficient.
Do make this sql more efficient we have to deal with like '%xxxxxx%' and the context indexes like to be a option, but we have to be able to do some substring search with context option.
Is it possible to do it and how?
This is my question and why i post it here. The query is just a simple example to illsutrate what i want.
Thanks to anyone who can answer my question.

Running unidsdiff does not work and I get a "Search Limit Exceeded" error.

When I try to run unidsdiff to correct differences between the Calendar
Server and Directory Server databases, I get an error that the search limit was
exceeded. The strange thing is, unidsdiff works fine on other Calendar machines
in the Calendar node network.
<P>
Check to make sure you have an adequate value set for "Size Limit in Entries" on
the Directory Server. This value should be greater than the number of users you
have on the corresponding Calendar Server machine.
<P>
For example, if you have 2500 users on the Calendar Server, the Directory Server
setting for "Size Limit in Entries" should be greater than 2500. The default
value is 2000.

How To: Direct Message and Joe L

Increase search limit

Hi,
I want to search for all users to assign them a role, but when I search it shows me only 1000 users, how can I increase the search limit, to assign it to all users.
Thanks,
Swetha

Hi Swetha,
For increase search limit; Please follow below steps:
1. goto D:\usr\sap\<Inst-ID>\JCxx\j2ee\configtool -->configtoo.bat
ex: D:\usr\sap\J3E\JC01\j2ee\configtool -->configtoo.bat
2.Goto cluster-data --> Global server configuration --> services --> com.sap.security.core.ume.service
3. set below setting
ume.admin.search_maxhits=?
ume.admin.search_maxhits=?
4.Save.
5.Restart the engine.
Please Reward points;
Regards,
Nagaraju

ADF 11g: How to implement search form with automatic substring search

We have ADF search form and result table on the same page. Say, VO that this search form is based upon is famous Employee table from HR schema. What we need is a logic when user enters partial employee first name ie: 'jo'...it should return 'john', johnny, joanne etc...
just like if user would use wildcard %
What worked in 10g ADF was something like this:
        AccessServiceImpl svc = (AccessServiceImpl)JSFUtils.EL("#{data.AccessService.dataProvider}");
        BirthViewNewImpl b = svc.getBirthViewNew();
        ViewCriteria vc = b.getViewCriteria();
        String staffId = JSFUtils.getFromSession("staffId").toString();
        String studyId = JSFUtils.getFromSession("studyId").toString();
        if (vc != null) {
            System.out.print("BR " + studyId + " " + staffId + " ");
            AttributeDef[] defs = vc.getViewObject().getAttributeDefs();
            Iterator criteriaRows = vc.iterator();
            while (criteriaRows.hasNext()) {
                ViewCriteriaRow r = (ViewCriteriaRow)criteriaRows.next();
                if (r != null) {
                    for (int j = 0, numAttrs = defs.length; j < numAttrs; j++) {
                         if (JboTypeMap.isCharType(defs[j].getSQLType())) {
                             String val = (String)r.getAttribute(j);
                             String col = defs[j].getColumnName();
                             if (val != null) {
                                 System.out.print(col + "=" + val + " ");//just to see what is going on
             System.out.println("");
        b.searchRecords();//method in VO that executes query
         * This is now very wrong.... Very artificial way to eliminate % from the UI
         if (vc != null) {
             AttributeDef[] defs = vc.getViewObject().getAttributeDefs();
             Iterator criteriaRows = vc.iterator();
             while (criteriaRows.hasNext()) {
                 ViewCriteriaRow r = (ViewCriteriaRow)criteriaRows.next();
                 if (r != null) {
                     for (int j = 0, numAttrs = defs.length; j < numAttrs; j++) {
                         if (JboTypeMap.isCharType(defs[j].getSQLType())) {
                             String val = (String)r.getAttribute(j);
                             String col = defs[j].getColumnName();
                             if (val != null) {
                                 val = val.substring(0,val.length()-1);//return to normal
                                   System.out.println("Column: " + col);
                                   System.out.println("Value: " + val);
                                   r.setAttribute(j,val);
        return null;The problem is for some reason this does not quite work in 11g.
What is the best practice to achieve this functionality in 11g?

Or use a catsearch index or a contains index in your query. The will preform much better for large datasets as it doesn't do a full table scan.
Google for Oracle Text ( http://www.google.de/search?q=%27oracle+text%27+catsearch&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:de:official&client=firefox-a )
Timo

Indexed substring search

Let's say I have lots of instances of the following class:   public class Bob {
      public final String name;
      public Bob(String name) {
         if (name==null) throw new ArgumentException();
         this.name=name;
   }The name of a bob can be pretty much anything, but usually it is 5-50 characters long and consists of ordinary words.
E.g.   List bobs=new ArrayList();
   bobs.add(new Bob("I am bob"));
   bobs.add(new Bob("foo bar"));
   bobs.add(new Bob("once upon a time there was a bob with a long name, and he's me"));How do I index the bobs so that I can search for the set of all bobs whose names contain a given substring. E.g., searching for "am" should result in a set containing the first ("I am bob") and the third ("...long name...") of the three bobs above.
If the substring is a whole word or at the beginning of one then it's easy; just keep a list of &lang;String word, Bob[] bobs&rang; tuples (each one listing all bobs whose name contains the word), sorted by word. Then you can do a binary search for the words you're interested in and put all matching bobs in a set that you'll then return.
However, if the substring is not at a word boundary it gets a lot harder!
The fact that there are so many bobs (perhaps a million) also places some constraints on the relative size of the indexes. After all, we don't want the index data structures to consume many times more memory than the bobs themselves do.
Any ideas?
- Marcus Sundman

I came up with this. I don't know if it's a good solution for you or at all but it seems to work and minimizes the nodes down to the size of the alphabet.
It can surely be optimized and cleaned up. Feel free to modify. Let me know what you think:
import java.util.*;
public class FancyTree
    public static void main(String[] args)
        FancyTree tree = new FancyTree();
        tree.add("amble");
        tree.add("same");
        tree.add("name");
        tree.add("mean");
        tree.add("earn");
        tree.add("glean");
        tree.add("same meaning");
        tree.add("meanie");
        System.out.println("a: " + tree.findStrings("a"));
        System.out.println("i: " + tree.findStrings("i"));
        System.out.println("am: " + tree.findStrings("am"));
        System.out.println("sa: " + tree.findStrings("sa"));
        System.out.println("me: " + tree.findStrings("me"));
        System.out.println("samean: " + tree.findStrings("samean"));
        System.out.println("mean: " + tree.findStrings("mean"));
        System.out.println("ean: " + tree.findStrings("ean"));
        System.out.println("ea: " + tree.findStrings("ea"));
    private Node[] nodes = new Node[255];
    public void add(String s)
        Link parent = null;
        for (int i = 0; i < s.length(); i++) {
            Link link = new Link(s, parent);
            getNode(s.charAt(i)).add(link);
            parent = link;
    private Node getNode(char c)
        if (c > 255) throw new IllegalArgumentException();
        Node node = nodes[c];
        if (node == null) {
            node = new Node();
            nodes[c] = node;
        return node;
    public Set findStrings(String subString)
        Collection links = getNode(subString.charAt(0)).getLinks();
        for (int i = 1; i < subString.length() && links.size() > 0; i++) {
            links = getNode(subString.charAt(i)).getLinks(links);
        Set strings = new HashSet();
        for (Iterator i = links.iterator(); i.hasNext(); ) {
            strings.add(((Link) i.next()).getStringParent());
        return strings;
class Node
    private Map links = new HashMap();
    public void add(Link link)
        links.put(link.getParent(), link);
    public Collection getLinks()
        return links.values();
    public Set getLinks(Collection parents)
        HashSet set = new HashSet();
        for (Iterator i = parents.iterator(); i.hasNext();) {
            Object link = links.get(i.next());
            if (link != null) set.add(link);
        return set;
class Link
    private String stringParent;
    private Link linkParent;
    Link(String stringParent, Link linkParent)
        this.stringParent = stringParent;
        this.linkParent = linkParent;
    public Object getParent()
          return linkParent == null ? (Object) stringParent : linkParent;
    public String getStringParent()
        return stringParent;
}

Java API: Parallel Search limit per CatalogData instance (MDM4J)?

MDM4J (legacy API) Experts,
Have you ever run into a limit on the number of Searches than can be performed in parallel, using the same MDM session (i.e. one CatalogData instance)?
We've been consistently getting an error at > 60 searches.
The maxConnection parameter in the Login() method doesn't appear to help - set it to 100, and we still top out at 60.
If you've found a way to increase this threshold, I'm very interested in the how-to!
Cheers,
...Dee

Hi Walter,
thanks for the info.
I guess christmas is not the good time to work on serious code
In fact after going thro' the API i was able to figure out the code to write it. Just so that i would be helpful to others i am putting it here..
this link will give you a good understanding of how to get the Qualifiers.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp%5Fmdm550/helpdata/en/46/2b62d0f2b54f07e10000000a114a6b/content.htm
Read the brief explaination at the end after the block diagram, it will help save you lots of time
           RetrieveRecordsByIdCommand recordCommand = new RetrieveRecordsByIdCommand(connection);
           recordCommand.setSession(sessionId);
           recordCommand.addId(recordId);
           recordCommand.execute();
           RecordResultSet rs = recordCommand.getRecords();
           Record rec = rs.getRecord(0);
           QualifiedLookupValue qlv = (QualifiedLookupValue)rec.getFieldValue(field);
           QualifiedLinkValue[] links = qlv.getQualifiedLinks();
hope it helps others.
Cheers
Kiran

Work around for 1 year search limit on CalDAV calendars?

By researching a couple of forums and doing some of my own testing I seem to have confirmed that if a calendar on an iOS device is synced "over the air" (CalDAV) then Calendar and Spotlight search will only look 12 months into the past - regardless of how many months/years of calendar data is actually synced.
If a calendar is synced via iTunes this limitation does not seem to apply.
Accepting that this is the case, my query is what is the least onerous way to:
a) Be able to search 2-3 years into the past and
b) Have additions/changes that are made on the iPhone/iPad immediately sync into the cloud server
The specific scenario I have (for a client) involves Outlook 2010 on a Windows 7 PC syncing over the air using iCloud.
My first thought is to maintain a separate calendar in Outlook for items more than (say) 11 months old. Have that calendar sync via iTunes - on the premise that it it is unlikely to change very often. Then once a month (say) manually move the 11-12 month old items from the CalDAV calendar to the iTunes calendar.
My second thought is to simply sync the same calendar both over the air and via iTunes and live with the duplicate entries.
Does anybody have ideas that are slightly more sophisticated and/or elegant than this?
Thanks in advance,
Graham

That's a bit sketchy. There's a much simpler way around the Volume Limitation. That's removing it. Just set the Volume Limit to its maximum, and it's virtually gone.

End-user item search limit @ 250, increase?

Hello,
I am wondering if there is a way to increase the limit of items returned for a search from 250 to something more?
Example -
UserA has a mailbox. 3000+ emails, 1 year worth of data in the Inbox.
UserA has his Outlook configured in "online" mode (cache disabled). "Improve search speed by limiting the number of results shown" is disabled as well (in the Options > Search).
UserA runs a search for letter "a".
Search returns 250 items - no option to get more at the bottom of search results.
UserA logs in to OWA.
Runs a search for letter "a" again.
OWA returns 250 items and says "If you can't find what you were looking for, please try more specific terms"
Exception -
If UserA puts his Outlook in cached mode, and allows it to cache everything, the search (performed locally by the indexer on UserA's machine) will find way more than 250 items.
This behavior is observed in Outlook 2010 and Outlook 2013.
This was not an issue when UserA was on Exchange 2010 - when the user clicked "Get More" after the initial results from Search, it would load everything else it found.
Question - Where on the Exchange server can I modify the setting for this, and is it modifiable?
Answers similar to "have user use more specific terms" or "have user specify a time range" are not what I am looking for. This worked in 2010 and having to tell the user to use more specific terms will equal to a disaster.
Please advise, thanks.

Hello,
I'm afraid that there is no way to modify the setting.
Cara Chen
TechNet Community Support
You are kidding, right??
How should I explain this to our users who works on a terminal server?
Oh my god!!
We are running Outlook in Online mode on the terminal servers (Best practices).

Text Search Limit to Whole Word

I'm trying to search my catalog for all photos with the word "Fall" as a keyword. In addition to photos with "Fall", LR also gives me "Silver Falls", "Falls" - any word that has "fall" as part of the name.
I've gotten around this by adding an "!" before each word I want to exclude, but obviously this requires a lot more time to exclude every word that includes the word that you want.
Is there a way of telling LR that the word you type in is the EXACT word you want? Just as you can add "!" before words you do not want.
Thanks,
Greg

Try
+Fall+ (finds all photos containing the exact word 'fall')
+Fall (all photos starting with 'fall')
Fall+ (all photos ending with 'fall')

Search return limit

Before we added 500 users yesterday, we could use the search tool in the "User" portlet to return the list of all users. Now it throws this error:
Error: Number of results exceeded the search return limit. Please narrow the search criteria and try again.
Can whatever this default setting for the number of results be changed? And if so, how?
Mike

"orclSizeLimit" is the attribute to specify the search limit which limits the number of entries to be retrieved by a query. Modifying this attribute might help you. This is what you are looking for?
Edited by: vindla on Sep 2, 2011 2:57 AM

Product Search Using Oracle Text or By Any Other Methods using PL/SQL

Hi All,
I have requirement for product search using the product table which has around 5 million products. I Need to show top 100 disitnct products searched in the following order
1. = ProductDescription
2. ProductDescription_%
3. %_ProductDescription_%
4. %_ProductDescription
5. ProductDescription%
6. %ProductDescription
Where '_' is space. If first two/three/or any criteria itslef gives me 100 records then i need not search for another patterns
Table Structure Is as follows
Create Table Tbl_Product_Lookup
    Barcode_number                Varchar2(9),
    Product_Description Varchar2(200),
    Product_Start_Date Date,
    Product_End_Date Date,
    Product_Price Number(12,4)
Could you please help me implementing this one ? SLA for the search result is 2 seconds
Thanks,
Varun

You could use an Oracle Text context index with a wordlist to speed up substring searches and return all rows that match any of your criteria, combined with a case statement to provide a ranking that can be ordered by within an inner query, then use rownum to limit the rows in an outer query. You could also use the first_rows(n) hint to speed up the return of limited rows. Please see the demonstration below. If you decide to use Oracle Text, you may want to ask further questions in the Oracle Text sub-forum on this forum or space or whatever they call it now.
SCOTT@orcl_11gR2> -- table:
SCOTT@orcl_11gR2> Create Table Tbl_Product_Lookup
2    (
3       Barcode_number       Varchar2(9),
4       Product_Description Varchar2(200),
5       Product_Start_Date   Date,
6       Product_End_Date     Date,
7       Product_Price          Number(12,4)
8    )
9 /
Table created.
SCOTT@orcl_11gR2> -- sample data:
SCOTT@orcl_11gR2> insert all
2 into tbl_product_lookup (product_description) values ('test product')
3 into tbl_product_lookup (product_description) values ('test product and more')
4 into tbl_product_lookup (product_description) values ('another test product and more')
5 into tbl_product_lookup (product_description) values ('another test product')
6 into tbl_product_lookup (product_description) values ('test products')
7 into tbl_product_lookup (product_description) values ('selftest product')
8 select * from dual
9 /
6 rows created.
SCOTT@orcl_11gR2> insert into tbl_product_lookup (product_description) select object_name from all_objects
2 /
75046 rows created.
SCOTT@orcl_11gR2> -- wordlist:
SCOTT@orcl_11gR2> begin
2    ctx_ddl.create_preference('mywordlist', 'BASIC_WORDLIST');
3    ctx_ddl.set_attribute('mywordlist','PREFIX_INDEX','TRUE');
4    ctx_ddl.set_attribute('mywordlist','PREFIX_MIN_LENGTH', '3');
5    ctx_ddl.set_attribute('mywordlist','PREFIX_MAX_LENGTH', '4');
6    ctx_ddl.set_attribute('mywordlist','SUBSTRING_INDEX', 'YES');
7    ctx_ddl.set_attribute('mywordlist', 'wildcard_maxterms', 0) ;
8 end;
9 /
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SCOTT@orcl_11gR2> -- context index that uses wordlist:
SCOTT@orcl_11gR2> create index prod_desc_text_idx
2 on tbl_product_lookup (product_description)
3 indextype is ctxsys.context
4 parameters ('wordlist mywordlist')
5 /
Index created.
SCOTT@orcl_11gR2> -- gather statistics:
SCOTT@orcl_11gR2> exec dbms_stats.gather_table_stats (user, 'TBL_PRODUCT_LOOKUP')
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SCOTT@orcl_11gR2> -- query:
SCOTT@orcl_11gR2> variable productdescription varchar2(100)
SCOTT@orcl_11gR2> exec :productdescription := 'test product'
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SCOTT@orcl_11gR2> column product_description format a45
SCOTT@orcl_11gR2> set autotrace on explain
SCOTT@orcl_11gR2> set timing on
SCOTT@orcl_11gR2> select /*+ FIRST_ROWS(100) */ *
2 from   (select /*+ FIRST_ROWS(100) */ distinct
3              case when product_description = :productdescription            then 1
4               when product_description like :productdescription || ' %'       then 2
5               when product_description like '% ' || :productdescription || ' %' then 3
6               when product_description like '% ' || :productdescription       then 4
7               when product_description like :productdescription || '%'       then 5
8               when product_description like '%' || :productdescription       then 6
9              end as ranking,
10              product_description
11           from   tbl_product_lookup
12           where contains (product_description, '%' || :productdescription || '%') > 0
13           order by ranking)
14 where rownum <= 100
15 /
   RANKING PRODUCT_DESCRIPTION
         1 test product
         2 test product and more
         3 another test product and more
         4 another test product
         5 test products
         6 selftest product
6 rows selected.
Elapsed: 00:00:00.10
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 459057338
| Id | Operation                      | Name               | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT               |                    |    38 | 3990 |    13 (16)| 00:00:01 |
|* 1 | COUNT STOPKEY                 |                    |       |       |            |          |
|   2 |   VIEW                         |                    |    38 | 3990 |    13 (16)| 00:00:01 |
|* 3 |    SORT UNIQUE STOPKEY         |                    |    38 |   988 |    12   (9)| 00:00:01 |
|   4 |     TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| TBL_PRODUCT_LOOKUP |    38 |   988 |    11   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 5 |      DOMAIN INDEX              | PROD_DESC_TEXT_IDX |       |       |     4   (0)| 00:00:01 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
   1 - filter(ROWNUM<=100)
   3 - filter(ROWNUM<=100)
   5 - access("CTXSYS"."CONTAINS"("PRODUCT_DESCRIPTION",'%'||:PRODUCTDESCRIPTION||'%')>0)
SCOTT@orcl_11gR2>

Search not Working in Webhelp or Webhelp Pro

I am currently running Adobe Robohelp version 10. I have several different RH files that I manage (desk procedures) and in each of the ones that I manage, my latest publishings have broken search functions. What I mean by broke: it will search some words just fine, but others that I know are in my desk procedures show "no topics found".   Some of my files are published using webhelp and some webhelp pro, with the same problem.
I have done the following:
1) Gone back to a backed up file dated 05/01/2014 (that the search seems to be working just fine in) and done edits to it, published and it breaks the search.
2) I have gone back to the working 05/01/2014 file and done nothing to it except publish it and it breaks.
3) Checked the button to clear the cache
4) From Webhelp Settings Option I have:
·         Changed output folder that it publishes to (which is on a local drive before I transfer it to the network drive)
·         I have enabled substring search (which actually does allow it to render some results, but not all the results it should)
·         Tried to click “Republish All” setting
5) Created new (not duplicate) webhelp layout
6) Checked that language is set to English (US)
7) Ensured that the words that I know aren’t searching aren’t included in the ignore and stop list.
8) Tried switching from DHTML > Pure HTML to just Pure HTML
9) I noticed that the Output view generates the following message :
                Processing Full-text-search data...
Finished processing Full-Text-Search data in 0 sec(s)
10) Deleted the “webhelp” file from the !SSL! folder and then republished it
11) The biggest finds that I have are the following:
·         That publishing the file is what seems to break the search functionality
·         When the file is published a few of the files in the !SSL! folder are substantially smaller than they were in the working file:
o   WHXDATA
o   WHGDATA
Any help with this problem would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks, Shannon

Try
http://www.adobe.com/support/robohelp/downloads.html
and
http://www.wvanweelden.eu/articles/robohelp-patches-and-updates
See www.grainge.org for RoboHelp and Authoring tips
@petergrainge

DPS 6.3.1 substring search limit?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for