Duplicate check for non inventory vendor invoices in Finance

Hi,
SAP provides duplicate check for non inventory vendor invoices posted through transactions F-43 and FB01 etc. The field values checked for duplicate invoice include Document date and Reference field.
I want to know, is there any flexibility of removing Document date from checking criteria?
This is to facilitate picking more invoices in duplicate check net.
Regards,
Vijay

Dear Vijay
Yes, you can control this via business transaction events. Please review the below explanation.
In Rel 4.6, duplicate invoices are checked using function module
FI_DUPLICATE_INVOICE_CHECK which is called when invoices are posted via trans FB60. Duplicate invoice checking criteria can be customized using the open FI interface SAMPLE_PROCESS_00001110 (custom function module) starting from Rel 4.6. Please verify if the open FI interface 00001110 is being used in your system and review duplicate invoice selection criteria via trans BERP. You may wish to omit the document date (BLDAT field from the duplicate invoice check criteria to trigger error msg F5117. In addition, table BSIP (vendor duplicate documents) may need to be updated. (see note 114563 for further info).
Please also check note 537213, and note 31771 for your information.
If this helps please reward with points.
Best Regards
Kesav

Similar Messages

Activation of duplicate check for vendor or customer account by matchcode

Hi,
Could you please me know how to do the activation of duplicate check for vendor as well as customer account by matchcode.
Many Thanks,
Panneer

solved

Vendor code shall be editable for non-po based invoice

hi,
how to do Vendor code shall be editable for non-po based invoice.

Hi Praveen,
You cannot create a Invoice without reference to PO through MIRO,
You can create a Invoice witout reference to PO throughj FB60 where you can enter the vendor of your choice.
Cheers
Chris

Error Message Posting a Non-PO Vendor Invoice

The instance is ECC 6.0.
While trying to post a non-PO vendor invoice, I am getting the below error message:
"RKEAK-FIELD(12) is not an input field
Parked document could not be posted 00 S 347 RKEAK-FIELD"
Does anyone ever bumped into the same error message or have an idea what is generating the error?
The issue started happening after one of the accounts in posting (Vendor Discounts) which is a CE was changed to post to Profitability Segment in OKB9. This error was not faced earlier when the account was posting to Cost Centers.
We are using new GL and Doc Splitting functionality.

Thanks for your reply.
I checked the note and it says the affected release are 3.0 D to 3.1G. But we are on ECC 6.0. Moreover, as per the note this is an issue with Tcode FB01, but I am using tcode FB60 for creating the non-PO invoice...
Please let me know your thoughts...

Credit memo for non inventory item

Hi MM consulatnats,
My client need to know the best practices to handle teh credit memo for non inventory item ??
We have two options like FB65 in FI part where it wont update in PO history.
In MIRO also we can make credit memo w.r.to PO.
What they want to know is if FB65 is the correct way to do this to fully reverse the effect that the receipt and invoicing of the item had on the financial accounts.
What is the best pracise to adopt ??
Need your views
Thanks
A.Gururajan

Hi,
You can use MIRO for credit Memo with ref to PO.
This will update both PO history as well as your FI accounts/Vendor Balance.
Thanks & Regards,

GRPO for Non-Inventory Items

Hi Mentors,
This is again the issue on doing a GRPO(Item Type) of a non-inventory item not creating a JE. Based on inventory perspective, there is nothing to update in the warehouse stock level. But from an accounting perspective, it should debit inventory expense account and credit "Goods Received not invoiced" account?
I'm not an accountant so I'm not sure if my reasoning/understanding on this is correct. Please do enlighten me on this.
We have a GRPO which does not have any JE tied to it, how will such a transaction be Invoiced? The "Copy to AP Invoice" or "Copy From GRPO" does not seem to work? The base document of the GRPOs are POs', and the POs' themselves don't have a tied JE.
Currently using SAP B1 2004B and will be upgrading to 8.81 soon. As I checked the forums, this would be a normal feature of B1. Based on this [link|Re: J/E for Goods Receipt P.O.] here in the forums.
I want to have a clear conceptual understanding of this, inventory and accounting wise, so I can explain this to the concerned parties in the company.
Thanks in advance!
Sean

Hi Sean......
System is behaving properly as per its logic. Infact it does same in all the previous or upcoming versions.
If you have Item Type GRPO for Non Inventory Item it does not create any accounting but you can see the same during AP invoice.
GRPO for such type is only optional. For further clarification you can discuss this with your CA what he suggests. But i suggest you to raise AP invoice also for getting Account effect. Just see doing this in test DB you get your answer......
Regards,
Rahul

GR/IR Clearing for Non-Inventory Items in PO

Hi all,
Can anybody explain if GR/IR reconciliation can be done for non-inventory items in PO. For example, I've raised a PO for a service and received invoice before the service is delivered (little hypothetical, of course, but incase).
If so, will it show in the same MR11?
Thanks
durga.

Hi,
First of all , in case of Service ,Only SR/IR reconcilation can be done.....second ,if your service is not delivered then you can give advance against service PO.
Regards

Workflow for non PO base invoice (FV60)

Dear All,
I am trying to customizing workflow for non po base invoice. I have done all the nessary customization setting - obwa , obwj , obwb, obwc, obwd.obwe,obwf & using subworkflow WS10000051. Also I have checked that both Released Necessary & Doc. complited marked when document parked. I refered the following thread for the customization setting.
Re: Hi Csaba Soltesz, How can you activate workflow
Now the workflow is not triggering when I a document parked(save as complited). I am checking this via. FB03 ---> workflow --> Workflow overview
Please not that workflow is working perfectly for other company code in the same client. Hence nessary workflow setting already maintiained in the client.
*Kindly let me know whether I have missed some step?
Thanks in advance.
Regards
spsahu

answered

Duplicate check for Contracts

Dear Gurus,
While creating Contracts, we would like to put a duplicate check for the Contracts. Currently, the system allows us to create a duplicate Contract for the same Vendor, Material, Validity period, etc.
Please suggest if there is a way to handle this critical requirement.
Awaiting your speedy response.
Regards
Ramu

Hi
As per SAP standard there is no check for duplicate contracts,
But you can implement the check using the BAdi
ME_PROCESS_OUT_CUST
Typical applications for this BAdI include:
Processing of own objects
Processing of additional data on standard objects
Implementation of additional validations and derivations
Data changes in standard fields
Change in field selection (also relevant to BAPIs)
In the standard system, the BAdI is not active.
The BAdI is filter-independent and can be used multiple times.
The BAdI is released internally only
In the implementation process, use the Methods
PROCESS_HEADER
PROCESS_ITEM
Thanks & Regards
Kishore

Formatted Search - Calculate GP Base Price for Non Inventory Items

Hi Experts,
On one of our customer's 8.8 PL 15 installation, requirement was to calculate GP for Non Inventory Items (on SO screen). Since SAP does not automatically calculates it we proposed and implemented following solution.
1. Have all Non Inventory Items to be costed at Standard cost so that you can manually enter the cost in the Item Master.
2. Write following formatted search on GP Base Price field so as to calculate the GP Base Price for the Non Inventory Items only. The formatted search must not make any changes to Inventory Items as we want system to calculate the GP automatically (just in case cost changes from SO to Delivery or Invoice).
DECLARE @II AS nVarchar(1)
DECLARE @COST AS Numeric(19,2)
SET @II = (SELECT OITM.InvntItem FROM OITM WHERE OITM.ItemCode = $[RDR1.ItemCode])
SET @COST = (SELECT (OITW.AVGPrice * $[RDR1.NumPerMsr]) FROM OITW WHERE OITW.ItemCode = $[RDR1.ItemCode] AND
OITW.WhsCode = $[RDR1.WhsCode])
IF (@II = 'N')
BEGIN
SELECT @COST
END
3. Formatted search achieves what was originally required however if a user overwrites the Item Code (Inventory Item) in the SO then above formatted search clears the GP Base Price field and sets the GP basis for the item as "Manual". By obverwrite means user first selected item A0001 on line 1 and then entered A0002 on same line i.e. Line 1.
My question here is what is wrong in the formatted search that is resulting in this behaviour.
Any questions please let me know.
Thanks in advance.
Regards
Devinder

Hi Gordon,
Thanks for taking out time to help me however Key requirement here is
Write formatted search on GP Base Price field so as to calculate the GP Base Price for the Non Inventory Items only.
Your query sets the base price for GP Base Price for Inventory Item to ZERO and Base Price By to Manual.
Note that my Formatted search has a problem only when an Inventory Item line is overwritten. I am not sure if this is a problem with SAP itself rather than my query.
Any other ideas please?
Regards
Devinder

Duplicate Check for Business Partners

Hi,
I was checking the Application COMM_CONTACT. When I create a new contact person, there is a duplicate check. When you want to create a new business partner of type person, the system raises an pop-up. This pop up appears when you want to create a new contact person of an company, which already exists.
I would like to have this kind of functionality for the creation of an business partner of type organisation.
Does any of you folks have an solution for that issue without an third party product.
Or do you have any clue, why the explained problem on the top does not work with business partners (organizations), as it is working with business partners (person).
Thanks in advance
Stephan

Hi
goto Table:CRMV_BP_DCIFL and choose table =ADRC and required filed name at waht level you want to have Duplicate check for ORG and fill other relevant data as you filled for ADRP table entry
Try this....
Phani K

Duplicate check for Connection Objects in CRM

Hi,
I want to implement a duplicate check for connection objects in CRM. The duplicate check shall use the address of the connection object and perhaps additonal attributes. I have found a duplicate check for business partners using the basis address service and TREX as index pool. However, I couldn't find a similar functionality for connection objects. Does somebody know:
1) How to implement a duplicate check for connection objects which is based on the address of the connection object?
2) Is there a way to use the TREX-based duplicate check which is integrated into the basis address service for connection objects?
Thanks in advance!
Best regards,
Frank

I also have a requirement to check for duplicate address at connection object level and we are using SAP data servies to validate the address. Can anyone share their experience.

Standard IDoc Type for Inbound NonPO Vendor Invoices - FB60

What should be the perfect standard IDoc Type for Inbound NonPO Vendor Invoice posting. Tcode FB60.
I found IDoc Type FIDCCP02 but the Function Module 'IDOC_INPUT_FIDCC2' for FIDCCP02 is not released.
In the same way many other standard function modules like - IDOC_INPUT_ACLPAY, IDOC_INPUT_FIDCCH, IDOC_INPUT_ACC_INVOICE_RECEIPT and few more are not released.
My question : If at all I have to use standard IDoc Type, Message type and Function module (Released) for Inbound NonPO Vendor Invoices, then what should be the solution from SAP ?
Thanks,
Veeru.

Hi,
IDOC_INPUT_FIDCC2 for FIDCCP02 works for us in ECC6.0
If you want Automatic tax calculation functionality using FIDCCP02.. then FIDCC2 is not correct message type for you. In that case you should probably go for :
Msg: INVOIC
Basic type: INVOIC02
FM: IDOC_INPUT_INVOIC_FI
Process code: INVF
Thanks,
Kumar

Excise tab comes for non excisable vendor also

Hi,
I am facing the issue at the time of GRN that I am getting excise tab for the non-excisable materials also.How can i remove this error message and excise tab for non-excisable vendors.
I didn't maintain the Excise details for Non-excisable vendor and tax code selected as VAT in purchase order.
Regards,
Dinesh

Hi,
In MIGO, excise tab appears in following cases:
1) When we maintain material & chapter ID combination for that plant.
2)CENVAT Determination
3)Vendor excise details.
If this material is not excisable/CENVATABLE, then select the option "No excise entry" at header excise tab & post the document.
Regards,
Piyush

Recommendations, samples, etc for creating a "Vendor Invoice" Content Type.

I am developing a "Vendor Invoice Approval" application in SharePoint 2013. My development platform is "Visual Studio 2013". This will be an "Intranet only" application running only on our internal SharePoint
2013 Farm.
I am planning on using a "Document Library" to store all of the Invoices. I believe the "correct" approach (or one of many, probably, lol) would be to create a "Content Type" called "Vendor Invoice". The "content
type" would then need to have the following functionality:
Custom Columns. Some columns would be "required", some would be "optional".
Vendor Name - Chosen from a “Vendors” list (a SharePoint "custom" list that contains "Vendor Name" and "People Responsible" (which will be a "People" type column and allow multiple choices/people from
a SharePoint Group called "Vendor Invoice Person Responsible"). The user may also enter a new Vendor Name.
Person Responsible - Limited to the users in the “Vendor Invoice Person Responsible” SharePoint Group. Will allow the selection of 1 or more "people" from that Group. (When a Vendor Name is "chosen" (above), this field
should be populated with the values from the "People Responsible" record for that Vendor. The user can then ONLY choose between those users or choose them all. Optionally, I may just store a single Person in the "Vendors" list and use that
to populate this field with a "default" value, but then allow the user to pick ANY user from the "Vendor Invoice Person Responsible" SharePoint Group).
Invoice Number (Will probably renamed the “Title” column.)
Invoice Date
Invoice Amount
PO Number (When entered, look it up in our ERP system and populate as many fields as possible, such as the Vendor Name, Account Number and Plant.)
Status - Most likely this field will only be adjusted via "workflows". Choices are:
“Created” – The initial Status when an Invoice is created (BEFORE any “Issue” or “Approved”).
"Pending Issue" - An "Issue" needs to be resolved. (See "Issue" below.)
“Issue Resolved” – The current “Issue” has been resolved. The next status could be “Pending Issue” (if there is another Issue to resolve) or “Approved”.
“Approved” – All Issues have been resolved.
“Issue Check” – The Invoice was “Approved” and a check may now be issued to the Vendor.
“Completed” – The Invoice has been “Approved” and the vendor has been issued a check.
Issue - Chosen from an “Invoice Issues” list (a SharePoint "custom" list that contains "Issue" and the name of a "WorkFlow" to execute on the "Invoice" in order to resolve that particular "Issue").
When an Issue is chosen, this will trigger a "Workflow" (or more than one?? probably only one...) to start.
Account Number
Plant (Choices: 1-New York, 2-Los Angeles,99-Headquarters)
Invoice Notes
Template/Forms (Insert/Update)/Development/Event Receivers/Display Template/"UI". This is the part that I am unsure of and where "Visual Studio" will be used. (I have quite a bit of experience developing "SharePoint
Solutions". I am not interested in using the new "App Model". I have read about it, studied it, setup a local "App Store", etc, but for this particular application, I am going to stick with the "old" Solution based model.
I am more familiar with it and "believe" it will give me the most "power" and "flexibility". As I said.... I am unsure how to "categorize" the following "needs", so I am just going to lump the rest of the "features"
I need into the list below and ask for any feedback and/or help. :)
Adding Invoices - Ideally, the "drag and drop" feature will (can) be utilized by the user to add the new Invoices (I can force them to only add one Invoice at a time). If this is just "too much trouble", I
could require the user to only add them using the "Upload Document" control. Or, I could develop the UI (or just the Insert/Update UI) using traditional "ASP .Net" controls and insert/update the data using the Server
Object Model or the Client Object Model (CSOM).
Preview Invoices - There are several times I would like to show the Invoice (pdf) as a "preview" (when the Invoice is being Added or Edited, when the user is "Approving" or "Denying"
on Invoice via a "WorkFlow", or when an Invoice is "hovered" over in a Document Library View). Basically, anytime the Invoice needs to be acted on by a user, I would like to show the PDF in a "preview" window and
I don't mean just open it in a separate Tab or Window. I mean use something like an "IFrame" in a certain area of the page (depending on what the page is doing: Inserting/Editing/Viewing/etc) to show that preview. (For the "hover
preview", I believe I can use the same skills I learned when modifying how the "Enterprise Search Center" works with PDFs. Basically, it involved adding a new Display Template for the Search Item and referencing that template
in a new "Search Result Type". The new Display Template created an "IFrame" and populated it using our Office Web App Server via "WOPI". Anyway, I believe I can simply do the same thing in a Document Library View and most
likely in whatever "form" or "page" is responsible for the Insert/Edit. I suppose I am just looking for someone to tell me if this is "doable" (and as "easy" as I think it might be), what the "best"
way to accomplish it would be, or if it is a bad idea, etc. etc.)
"Auto Populate" the columns. When a new Invoice is added, I would like to use the (Enterprise) Search functionality (OCR and "graphic matching") to somehow populate as many of the columns (metadata) as possible.
This might involve looking for some particular "text" or graphic(s) (like a company logo?) to determine the Vendor. Then, once the Vendor is determined, I might be able to figure out other items, such as the "Invoice Number" and "PO".
Usually our Vendor Invoices don't change very often. This would only serve as "default" values, so it wouldn't have to be 100% correct. Anything I can do to save the user time or make it easier to enter new Invoices will go along way towards
acceptance of this application. (Currently, they use an Excel Spreadsheet, along with email. So, from their point of view, the existing "system", "works" and is very "easy" to use, etc....)
More uses for the "Search Index Results". It would also be "nice" if we could setup some "weighted rules" on a "per Vendor" basis to help determine who the "responsible user" is. (For instance,
we may get Invoices from a single Vendor that could possibly go to 1 of several "responsible users". In order to determine the correct user, I would like to setup some "rules" for each vendor to give "weighted" values to
certain "keywords". For instance, if the word "Computer" appears on the invoice, that might be worth "100 points" towards the "IT Manager". So, when the user is selecting the person responsible for this particular invoice,
I could order the list they are choosing from by the "total points" (as calculated from the "weighted rules") which would put the "Person" who is most "likely" the "Person Responsible" at
the top of the list, followed by the second most likely, and so on. I don't think this be that "hard" to do. I would simply need to store "keywords" and "values" and have access to the "Search Index Results" for the
document (Invoice) the user is currently adding.
**Another "option" I have for developing this application is to basically develop it using a traditional "ASP .Net" framework and controls (which I definitely have more experience with, but as I mentioned, I also
have quite a bit (4-5 years) of SharePoint development experience) and just using the "out of the box" features of SharePoint (and Custom Lists, Document Libraries, SharePoint Security Groups, WorkFlows), etc. What I am trying to describe is that
I would develop the "UI" (add/change/delete) using traditional "ASP .Net" controls and just use SharePoint for my "Data Source". (I DO need to AT LEAST use SharePoint as the "Data Source". This is for reasons that
I don't want to get into here and just bog down the discussion. I certainly realize this application could easily be a "traditional" "ASP .Net" application using "SQL" for the Data Source. So that part really isn't what I am looking
for "advise" on.)
Any help/advice/samples would be very MUCH appreciated!
Shayne

You should generate the XSD form the DTD files. Also you should list values unless necessary. XMLSpy is good tool I use.
You can send the XML schema file to me if you can't register it to XML DB. I will help you take a look.

Duplicate check for non inventory vendor invoices in Finance

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for