Duplicate payments in Payment list of F110 payment run

Hello all,
We had run APP trhu F110 payment run was as expected with amount 100000 EUR but when we checked payment list (EDIT- Payment - Payment list) there are duplicate entries and total is showing as 200000 EUR.
Following are onservations
1) In SAP posting made correctly to all vendors with a total of 100000 EUR. So no double payments posted in vendor account
2) Payment list is showing amounts with a doument numbers. Duplicate payments also having document numbers but which are not exists in SAP
3) Documents posted with doc type ZP in sap is not in serial i.e 1,2,3,4 Its posted like 1,3,5,7... the document no 2,4 can be seen in the payment list
4) Also I checked log for the payment run and I found one warning message as "Check whether a duplicate payment medium has been created"
5) Also status of payment run is "Posting orders: 1,174 generated, 605 completed"
6) I also checked setting in FBZP which is also correct
We need to correct the DME file with correect postings
If anyone has faced issue then please share your inputs
Thanks & regards

Dear Rajan,
the payment document validation works as follows:
If you select this parameter, a form is only printed if the related
payment document has already been posted.
Note that it is not advisable to schedule the payment program and the
data medium programs to run at the same time, if you want the system to
be able to carry out validation of the payment documents - because the
system does not start posting the documents at the same time as the
program runs, and in order to ensure that the payment program generally
finishes its run before all the payment documents have been posted, the
payment medium program (started after the payment program) would display
in the error list any documents that have not (yet) been found.
As a result double payments are not possible as no payment media is
created if the payment document is not posted. The items are still
open and are selected in the next payment run again.
If the payment document validation is not used, the payment media is
created but the open item is not cleared as the payment document is
not posted. In this case you have to clear the open items manually
(if a repeat update is not possible) to avoid double payments.
dear Prashant,
It is normal that if the automatic payment does not pay all the items, You can find them hanging into sm13.
However, in general, when this happens you could try to use the edit >
payments > after termination > draw up again option, if it is
available. If there is an entry in SM13, as in Your case, you should process it.
But sometimes the System does not allow to do it.
Anyway the only problem I can see is the one reported by the note 545340:
When the payment program is terminated, it may be the case that not all
payment documents exist on the updated database while the entries
already exist in the tables REGUH and REGUP. However, this basic
procedure has the advantage that the payment media can already be
created for the purpose of fast forwarding to the bank when for example
the payment documents update is delayed.
For this problem please refer to the Note 545340 point [4]
that answers to it.
Furthermore please be aware that:
as I told You in the beginning, If the payment program does not pay
all the invoices contained into the payment proposal, It will depend on
the fact that during the payment proposal run time and the payment
proposal time, something changed respect one of the selected invoices.
This means that one document number was NOT posted even if It is
contained in the tables REGUH and REGUP.
Please be informed payment data tables REGU* are used by only payment
program and no need to take any corrective action and should not be a
problem with auditors.
So You can pay the invoices manually or by the next automatic payment
run without any problem.
I hope now the System behaviour is more clear.
Mauri

Similar Messages

AP Scenario: Refund of Payment (Payt which resulted from F110 Payment Run)

Hi!
Would anybody know the tcodes to follow when there's refund of payment?
This goes on the assumption that Payment Run F110 was done.
Thanks
Fern

Hello,
We have analyzed the payment method supplement field. We have entered a value in the invoice and on processing of F110, this is not flowing into the payment document. So, the validation that we wrote is also not checked. Is there a way to ensure that the payment method supplement field flows into the payment docment or we should write an exit in the validation in order to check the same.
BR,
Akhil

F110: payment doc spliting

Dear all,
After F110, we expect to have one payment doc per vendor. However, same payment doc number lists twice. each payment doc group different doc type. eg. we have RE, KA and ZE in the open invoice. after f110, ZP shows twice with same doc number. One ZP groups RE and KA.
One ZP groups ZE. This happens after we upgrade to ECC 6.0 and ZP doc is generated via BAPI (MIRO). Before upgrade ZE was posted via BDC( MR01).
Did anyone have this type of issue before? Can anyone please advise the possible solution?
Thank you very much in advance.
Molly

HI,
This is possible to different year, but isn't your case. Documents number must entered without overlap. You've checked it.
You should try to find a SAP note on ths situation. If doesn't work you have to send a SAP message.
Rgds

F110 Issue:there is diff between of 1000usd in F110 payment list & dme file

H i experts
F110 Issue: there is difference between of 1000 usd in F110 payment list and Dme file.
please let me know reason
regards
sachin

Check the amount field in the DME as to which value it is picking. I think it is mapped incorrectly.
Ravi.

Adding custom message in exception list of F110 transaction without adding payment block

Hi All,
My requirement is to add custom message in exception list of F110 transaction based on certain fields validation without adding payment block .
I tried using BTE 1820 where I can add my validation but am not able to add the custom message in exception list.
Thanks,
Mihika.

Hi Raymond,
Thanks for your reply.
I did checked the document and tried giving the S and I message in my BTE with trace option checked on Additional log screen.
But Success and information message doesn't showed in Exception List.
If I set the Error message the Proposal gets cancelled and I can see my error message in log. (We don't want this option as in this option proposal is not getting created)
If I set the Payment block I can see that logged in exception list. But we don't want to set the payment block but the message should appear in exception list.
I added the message using simple message statement. Will you please advice if any other way to add the message other than using the MESSAFE statement.
Thanks,
Mihika.

How to avoid duplicate posting of noted items for advance payment requests?

How to avoid duplicate posting of noted items for advace payments request?

Puttasiddappa,
In the PS module, we allow the deletion of a component pruchase requisition allthough a purchase order exists. The system will send message CN707 "<i>A purchase order already exists for purchase requisition &</i>" as an Iinformation message by design to allow flexible project management.
If you, however, desire the message CN707 to be of type E you have to
modify the standard coding. Doing so, using SE91, you can invoke the
where-used-list of message 707 in message class CN, and to change the
i707(cn)
to
e707(cn)
where desired.
Also, user exit CNEX0039 provides the possibility to reject the
deletion of a component according to customers needs e. g. you may
check here whether a purchase order exists and reject the deletion.
Hope this helps!
Best regards
Martina Modolell

Payment proposal Exception list - Add additional items to the exception lis

Hi,
We have a requirement to add additional vendor open items (having Bank type as ABC and Payment method as Y) to the Exception list of the payment proposal when we run F110. Along with other open items which are may be blocked for payment or which require corrections that normally appear in the exception list, we also need the vendor open items satisfying the criteria of (having Bank type as ABC and Payment method as Y) to be appearing in the exception list.
We don't want to exclude these items altogether by putting them in the 'Free selection' tab of F110 but rather want them to be in the exception list.
Any inputs are appreciated.

Hi
All payments due will be selected by the payment run depending on the selection criteria you enter. I.e. if you need invoices due with payment method Y, enter Y in the payment method selection.
I am not clear to what you mean by Bank type. However, do note that in the "Free Selection" tab allows you to include specific fields as well. I.e. by not selecting "Exclude values".

Open items (F110 payment proposal)

Hi All,
Can someone clarify what are open items
1: invoices that are not cleared
2: credit memos
3:credit memos applied to an invoice
4:residuals
(When i run FBl5N credit memos are also shown as open items)
Also when i run F110 payment proposal it selects open items. Does it also select credit memo's?
Any help appreciated
Thanks,
Prashanth

1: invoices that are not cleared - YES
2: credit memos - YES, if not cleared against any invoice
3:credit memos applied to an invoice - YES
4:residuals - once you do the payment system create new invoice for balance , that will open item
When i run FBl5N credit memos are also shown as open items - if not cleared against any invoice that will come under open item list.
Also when i run F110 payment proposal it selects open items. Does it also select credit memo's? - YES, which are in red , are called as open items...all the items in open will come in F110 proposal run
VVR

APP - F110 - Payment of multiple invoices with different document type

Hi
Vendor X has been assigned with payment method same with two document types. One document type got 4 invoices and other document type got 1 invoice.
During payment run (F110) for each document type, the system picked up both the document type but listed them as two separate lines in the proposal list. When we process the payment the system also created two payment documents.
Is there a way for these two document types to be processed as a single proposal and payment.
Any suggestion how can we process these invoices together in a single proposal/payment document?
Thanks & Regards,
Sam

Thanks

Priority or payment method and Vendor in F110

Hi All,
During APP (F110) which takes the priority. Payment Method or Vendor.
For Example we have given Payment Methos as A & F in payment Run and Vendor as 30000. This vendor has payment method H on its master.
Now when we are running payment run it is picking this vendor in exception list;
Error#016 Pmnt methods for this run are not specified in master record or in item
Is it because we specified this vendor in Payment run and the payment method used is different.
Please correct me if my understanding is wrong.
Thanks!
Regards,
Vivek

Hi Vivek,
Your Question as to which one takes priority in F110, the vendor or the Payment Method.. so please understand, that System will have vendors mentioned as the base for checking.. the question of priority does not come here..it will check for all documents posted for this vendor with payment method A & F and propose for Payment, and if it does not find anything, it will show this vendor in the exception list.
I guess you are asking, whether system would propose, all vendors line items with Payment method A & F as per your question of priority, then the answer is "No'. System does not behave like that.
For all vendors that you have specified in the list of vendors in the parameters, it will check whether the Payment method mentioned in parameters exists or not, if yes, it will propose all line items with that payment method and if none found, it will show that vendor in exception list.
Hope it clarifies..
Regards,
SAPFICO

Run F110 Payment Proposal in Custom Z Report

Hi Folks,
I have a requirement to run payment proposal part of the F110 transaction from a Z program without having to create a payment proposal.
It's a little tricky to explain so I will try to say it in these terms:
My desired output is the "Display Payment Proposal: Payments" table that can be viewed by clicking Display Proposal button in F110.
My desired input is Company Code, Pament Methods, Next Payment Date and the list of Vendors (i.e. the values that are entered when creating the payment parameters.)
So, is this achieve able without going through tons of F110 code to replicate the functionality.
Many thanks for any help,
Colm

I created a function module to do the work. Hopefully somone finds it useful
FUNCTION z_run_dummy_pay_proposal.
*"*"Local Interface:
*" IMPORTING
*"     REFERENCE(I_LAUFD) TYPE F110V-LAUFD
*"     REFERENCE(I_ZWELS) TYPE F110V-ZWELS
*"     REFERENCE(I_NEDAT) TYPE F110V-NEDAT
*"     REFERENCE(I_LAUFI) TYPE F110V-LAUFI
*" EXPORTING
*"     REFERENCE(EXCEPTION) TYPE CHAR255
*" CHANGING
*"     REFERENCE(T_LIFNR) TYPE ZTT_LIFNR
*"     REFERENCE(T_BUKRS) TYPE ZTT_BUKRS
*"     REFERENCE(T_REGUH) TYPE ZTT_REGUH
*"     REFERENCE(T_REGUP) TYPE ZTT_REGUP
*"     REFERENCE(T_BSIK) TYPE ZTT_BSIK
DATA: ls_rfdt TYPE rfdt, "Cluster Table that stores the Payment Parameters
        lv_seconds TYPE i, "Seconds used to control the wait time
        ls_lifnr TYPE lifnr,
        ls_bukrs TYPE bukrs.
*RFTD table is the parameter cluster table for F110 amoung others
CONSTANTS: lc_relid TYPE rfdt-relid VALUE 'FB', "CHAR02 data element for SYST from RFDT table
             lc_parm TYPE c LENGTH 4 VALUE 'PARM', "Constant value to pass into the RFDT table
             lc_f110 TYPE c LENGTH 4 VALUE 'F110'. "Constant value to pass into the RFDT table
*The values are needed to store the parameters correctly in the Parameter Cluster Table
f110v-laufd = i_laufd.
f110v-laufi = i_laufi.
f110c-budat = i_laufd.
f110c-grdat = i_laufd.
rfdt-mandt = sy-mandt.
rfdt-relid = lc_relid.
CONCATENATE lc_f110 i_laufd i_laufi lc_parm INTO rfdt-srtfd.
f110id-progr = lc_f110.
f110id-laufd = i_laufd.
f110id-laufi = i_laufi.
f110id-objkt = lc_parm.
*Build up the Vendors that are being stored in the parameters
LOOP AT t_lifnr INTO ls_lifnr.
    r_lifnr-sign = 'I'.
    r_lifnr-option = 'EQ'.
    r_lifnr-low = ls_lifnr.
    APPEND r_lifnr.
ENDLOOP.
*Build up the Company Codes that are being stored in the parameters
LOOP AT t_bukrs INTO ls_bukrs.
    fkttab-bugrp = sy-tabix.
    fkttab-zwels = i_zwels.
    fkttab-nedat = i_nedat.
    fkttab-bukls = ls_bukrs.
    fkttab-xpruf = 'X'.
*To match the SAP standard I put in 6 blank lines
    APPEND fkttab.
    CLEAR fkttab.
    APPEND fkttab.
    CLEAR fkttab.
    APPEND fkttab.
    CLEAR fkttab.
    APPEND fkttab.
    CLEAR fkttab.
    APPEND fkttab.
    CLEAR fkttab.
    APPEND fkttab.
    CLEAR fkttab.
    APPEND fkttab.
ENDLOOP.
LOOP AT fkttab WHERE bugrp IS NOT INITIAL.
    buktab-bukrs = fkttab-bukls.
    buktab-bugrp = fkttab-bugrp.
    SELECT SINGLE land1
      FROM t001
      INTO buktab-land1
      WHERE bukrs = fkttab-bukls.
    SELECT SINGLE zbukr
      FROM t042
      INTO buktab-zbukr
      WHERE bukrs = fkttab-bukls.
    APPEND buktab.
ENDLOOP.
*Use the SAP standard to format the Vendors
PERFORM selektion_lifnr.
*Create the Payment Parameters
PERFORM sichern.
*Commit the work and wait for the Payment Parameters to be written to the database
COMMIT WORK AND WAIT.
*Wait up to 4 minutes for the Payment Parameters to be created, if they aren't after
*4 minutes raise an exception
CLEAR lv_seconds.
DO 240 TIMES.
    SELECT SINGLE *
      FROM rfdt
      INTO ls_rfdt
      WHERE relid = lc_relid
      AND srtfd = rfdt-srtfd.
    IF sy-subrc = 0.
      EXIT.
    ELSE.
      WAIT UP TO 1 SECONDS.
      lv_seconds = lv_seconds + 1.
      IF lv_seconds = 240.
        exception = 'parameter_create_failed'. "Old and new exceptions cannot be used at the same time
        EXIT.
      ENDIF.
    ENDIF.
ENDDO.
*Once the payment parameters have been created we can create a payment proposal
CALL FUNCTION 'SCHEDULE_PAYMENT_PROPOSAL'
    EXPORTING
      i_laufd           = i_laufd
      i_laufi           = i_laufi
      i_xstrf           = 'X' "Create immediatly
    EXCEPTIONS
      startdate_wrong   = 1
      parameters_missed = 2
      lock_failed       = 3
      job_open_failed   = 4
      job_close_failed = 5
      OTHERS            = 6.
IF sy-subrc <> 0.
    exception = 'proposal_create_failed'. "Old and new exceptions cannot be used at the same time
ENDIF.
*Trigger the Job
COMMIT WORK AND WAIT.
*Clear out the tables that are used to store the cluster table
*values for the parameters
REFRESH: buktab, fkttab, slktab, sldtab, trctab, usrtab,
           faetab, jobtab.
CLEAR:   buktab, fkttab, slktab, sldtab, trctab, usrtab,
           faetab, jobtab, f110c, trcopt, f110versionpar.
*Import the Payment Parameters Values
IMPORT buktab fkttab slktab sldtab trctab usrtab
         faetab jobtab f110c trcopt f110versionpar
         FROM DATABASE rfdt(fb) ID f110id.
*Check to see has the job finished
CLEAR lv_seconds.
DO 240 TIMES.
    READ TABLE jobtab INDEX 1.
    SELECT SINGLE *
      FROM tbtco
      WHERE jobname = jobtab-jobname
      AND jobcount = jobtab-jobcount
      AND status = 'F'.
    IF sy-subrc = 0.
      EXIT.
    ELSE.
      WAIT UP TO 1 SECONDS.
      lv_seconds = lv_seconds + 1.
      IF lv_seconds = 240.
        exception = 'proposal_create_failed'. "Old and new exceptions cannot be used at the same time
        EXIT.
      ENDIF.
    ENDIF.
ENDDO.
*Store the Payment Proposal Header Values
SELECT *
    FROM reguh
    INTO TABLE t_reguh
    WHERE laufd = i_laufd
    AND laufi = i_laufi.
*Delete the values where no payment will be made
DELETE t_reguh WHERE vblnr IS INITIAL.
*Store the Payment Proposal Line Item Values
SELECT *
    FROM regup
    INTO TABLE t_regup
    FOR ALL ENTRIES IN t_reguh
    WHERE laufd = t_reguh-laufd
AND laufi = t_reguh-laufi
AND xvorl = t_reguh-xvorl
AND zbukr = t_reguh-zbukr
AND lifnr = t_reguh-lifnr
AND kunnr = t_reguh-kunnr
AND empfg = t_reguh-empfg
AND vblnr = t_reguh-vblnr.
*Get the relevant Outstanding Payment to Vendors Values
SELECT *
    FROM bsik
    INTO TABLE t_bsik
    FOR ALL ENTRIES IN t_regup
    WHERE bukrs = t_regup-bukrs
AND lifnr = t_regup-lifnr
AND umsks = t_regup-umsks
AND umskz = t_regup-umskz
AND zuonr = t_regup-zuonr
AND gjahr = t_regup-gjahr
AND belnr = t_regup-belnr
AND buzei = t_regup-buzei.
*Delete the Payment Proposal
CALL FUNCTION 'DELETE_PAYMENT_PROPOSAL'
    EXPORTING
      date                = i_laufd
      identification      = i_laufi
    EXCEPTIONS
      abnormal_end        = 1
      no_delete_authority = 2
      OTHERS              = 3.
IF sy-subrc <> 0.
    exception = 'proposal_delete_failed'. "Old and new exceptions cannot be used at the same time
ENDIF.
*Delete the Payment Parameters
CALL FUNCTION 'DELETE_PAYMENT_PARAMETERS'
    EXPORTING
      i_laufd           = i_laufd
      i_laufi           = i_laufi
      i_inter           = space
    EXCEPTIONS
      no_authority      = 1
      parameters_missed = 2
      wrong_status      = 3
      OTHERS            = 4.
IF sy-subrc <> 0.
    exception = 'parameter_delete_failed'. "Old and new exceptions cannot be used at the same time
ENDIF.
ENDFUNCTION.
Edited by: Colm Gavin on Apr 15, 2011 12:22 PM

Like ot change the View of F110 (Payment proposal)

Hi
The veiw of the payment proposal using Tcode F110 is stamdatd as attached. and i would like to change this like as ALV Grid ..Please suggest how can i change the same.

Hello,
In O7FB you can define the fields that can be used to sort the payment proposal payment.
You can define a default layout to be used in the Display/Edit Payment Proposal, and then in F110 specify the sort sequence once thelist is displayed.
FAKP > Periodic Processing > Payment autom.pmnts > Line Layout
FAKP > Periodic Processing > Payment autom.pmnts > Default values >
and for transaction FBZ0 select the defined Layout
From release 5.0 the payment proposal processing was changed to the ALV. With this tool the line structure is determined - as in all ALV lists -within the application. During the use of the ALV the "old" Customizing settings are obsolete. Hence in your case with ALV option, the Proposal -> edit -> Settings -> Line Layout is greyed out. The note number 617492 is useful to understand this new funcionality.
As an alternative also I would suggest you to use proposal list , program RFZALI20.
I hope this helps.
Oscar

F110 Payment Run

I am having a problem with F110 Payment run. It's showing the error as: 'Item cannot be paid due to inconsistent withholding tax'. I have done the payment run for the same vendor, same company code and it worked well. Later, I deleted one of the WH Tax type in Vendor Master. Has anyone come across this or similar issue?. What can I do to solve this?.

hi,
I am not able to see the Deleted WH Tax info. when I run the RFWT0010. I tried to do the payment run after executing RFWT0010, but am not able to resolve the problem. I have run the S_P00_07000134(the 1099 report) a few days back(before posting the new Invoices). Do you think this has anything to do with the existing problem. And I have checked the config. again for the tax type, Tax codes and their assignments to Co.Cd. which everything seems to be correct. I tried to pay using f-53 which is showing the same error.
As Hein said i tried to look in the Invoice doc. for the WHTax info.(I have the setting to do calculate the WHTax amount @ the Payment level). So, its not possible to delete the Tax code and make the settings in VM.
As per suresh, I have checked the validity of the tax code its(1/1/2000-12/31/9999). And the tax type, tax code are assigned in the VMR.
I am not able to resolve this. Has anyone come across the same/similar issue and resolved it?.

Open Items run (F110 payment proposal)

Hi All,
Can someone please help me with a problem that I am facing when running F110.
We pay our vendors through F110 but also we have customers who we need to issue dividend equity check and their loan payout's. So when I do FB75 and create a credit note for customer and than I go FBL5N I see it there with other open invoices. Than I go to F110 and do a payment run and it creates a check for the difference. I don't want that to happen, I want the check issued for the credit amount that I posted in FB75. Is there any way I can print checks for the credit memos only and not mess with the customer open invoices. Please help if you know how to fix this problem. Thank you in advance for your help.
Happy Holidays!
Monika

You have a couple of options (select whichever is possible for your current system config):
First, you can specify different payment methods in cust. invoices and cust. credit memos. Then, in F110, specify only the cust. credit memo payment method, and the system should pick up only the credit memos.
Secondly, if the payment methods can't be different for both the document types, and if there are not too many invoices open, you can block all the open invoices. This way, F110 will not process the invoices with the credit memos.
Thirdly, there is a checkbox in the cust. master data (Company Code Data - Payment transactions) named "Single payment". Place your cursor on it, and hit <F1>. SAP says that "If this indicator is set, every customer/vendor open item is paid separately during automatic payment transactions. This means that open items are not grouped together for payment."
Fourthly, you can define Payment Groupings (T.Code OBAP).
IMG path Fin. Acctg. --> AR and AP --> Buss. Trans. --> Outgoing Payments --> Autom. Outgoing Payments --> Payment Method / Bank Selection for Payment Prog. --> Define Payment Groupings.
You can then specify these groupings in the cust. master screen (Company Code Data - Payment transactions) using field "Grouping Key".
Remember to assign points if found useful.
Regards,
Gulshan

How to restrict vendor line items to be picked to 6 in f110 payment run?

Hai
how we can allow F110 programme to generate a clearing document for every 6 line items.Means if a vendor has 15 open items which are due for payment at the time of Automatic Payment Run . The System should generate 3 clearing documents. Means the split up should be 663. Means for the first 6 open items (1-6) one clearing document. For next 6 Open items (7-12) and for the last 3 Open Items(13-15) , One clearing Document to be generated.
Kindly Advice me. Surely Iam going to reward the ponits.
Thanks In Advance, Have A Great Day
Akash Narayana

1)block all doc's where count > 6 (per vendor) and do f110
2)unlock and repeat 1)
.. until all doc's are paid
A.
Message was edited by:
Andreas Mann

Duplicate payments in Payment list of F110 payment run

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for