EA4.0 Errors

Question

Hi
After upgrading to SQL Dev and the ODM repository (on a 11.2.0.3 DB), I've gone into some of my existing workflows.  After a few minutes I noticed in the Logging Page-Log tab at the bottom of the screen the following errors. I don't know what I did to cause these, but you might be able to work out something
SEVERE
183
36204
oracle.ide.controller.IdeAction
Error during handleEvent on action 'null' (id=785). None of the attached controllers handled the action..
SEVERE
180
73994
oracle.ide.controller.IdeAction
Error during handleEvent on action 'null' (id=784). None of the attached controllers handled the action..
SEVERE
179
1331716
oracle.ide.controller.IdeAction
Error during handleEvent on action 'null' (id=784). None of the attached controllers handled the action..
SEVERE
164
0
oracle.dmt.dataminer.repository.StringUtils
null - java.lang.String.compareTo(String.java:1139)
Another thing. I try to re-run the Explore node on an existing workflow that was running against MINING_DATA_BUILD_V and after 5 minutes it is still running.  An ideas?
This used to take a few seconds before the upgrade.
Completed after 10 minutes!!!
Opening a workflow, opening a node, etc all seems to take a few seconds longer that ver 3.2.2.   or is it me?  this is not just for the ODM part but for most things in SQL Dev 4.
Regards
Brendan

Answer 1

Interesting. That is the timing I was expecting-ish.
Typical it might be something to do with me so
I started with SQL Dev 3 and upgraded with each release and EAs
I've tried it again and this time it took 6 minutes. From watching the Workflow Jobs progress bar it get to the 3/4 point quickly and then spends the rest of the time (approx 5.25 minutes) at this point before completing.
It seems to be something just before or starting the cleanup
Event
Job
Node
Sub Node
Time
Message
Duration
END(WORKFLOW)
ODMR$WFJOB4368
19/07/13 22:02:15
D:0 H:0 M:6 S:17
END(CLEANUP)
ODMR$WFJOB4368
19/07/13 22:02:15
D:0 H:0 M:0 S:0
START(CLEANUP)
ODMR$WFJOB4368
19/07/13 22:02:14
END(NODE)
ODMR$WFJOB4368
Explore Data 1
19/07/13 21:57:18
D:0 H:0 M:0 S:45
END(STATISTICS)
ODMR$WFJOB4368
Explore Data 1
19/07/13 21:57:18
D:0 H:0 M:0 S:23
END(CREATE HISTOGRAMS)
ODMR$WFJOB4368
Explore Data 1
19/07/13 21:57:14
D:0 H:0 M:0 S:9
START(CREATE HISTOGRAMS)
ODMR$WFJOB4368
Explore Data 1
19/07/13 21:57:06
END(CREATE EXPLORE STATISTICS)
ODMR$WFJOB4368
Explore Data 1
19/07/13 21:57:06
D:0 H:0 M:0 S:11
START(CREATE EXPLORE STATISTICS)
ODMR$WFJOB4368
Explore Data 1
19/07/13 21:56:55
START(STATISTICS)
ODMR$WFJOB4368
Explore Data 1
19/07/13 21:56:55
END(CREATE HISTOGRAM SAMPLE)
ODMR$WFJOB4368
Explore Data 1
19/07/13 21:56:55
D:0 H:0 M:0 S:0
START(CREATE HISTOGRAM SAMPLE)
ODMR$WFJOB4368
Explore Data 1
19/07/13 21:56:54
END(CREATE SAMPLE DATA)
ODMR$WFJOB4368
Explore Data 1
19/07/13 21:56:54
D:0 H:0 M:0 S:13
START(CREATE SAMPLE DATA)
ODMR$WFJOB4368
Explore Data 1
19/07/13 21:56:42
END(SAMPLE)
ODMR$WFJOB4368
Explore Data 1
19/07/13 21:56:38
D:0 H:0 M:0 S:0
START(SAMPLE)
ODMR$WFJOB4368
Explore Data 1
19/07/13 21:56:38
END(VALIDATE)
ODMR$WFJOB4368
Explore Data 1
19/07/13 21:56:38
D:0 H:0 M:0 S:6
START(VALIDATE)
ODMR$WFJOB4368
Explore Data 1
19/07/13 21:56:38
START(NODE)
ODMR$WFJOB4368
Explore Data 1
19/07/13 21:56:38
END(NODE)
ODMR$WFJOB4368
MINING_DATA_BUILD_V1
19/07/13 21:56:25
D:0 H:0 M:0 S:20
END(SAMPLE)
ODMR$WFJOB4368
MINING_DATA_BUILD_V1
19/07/13 21:56:25
D:0 H:0 M:0 S:13
START(SAMPLE)
ODMR$WFJOB4368
MINING_DATA_BUILD_V1
19/07/13 21:56:12
END(VALIDATE)
ODMR$WFJOB4368
MINING_DATA_BUILD_V1
19/07/13 21:56:12
D:0 H:0 M:0 S:7
START(VALIDATE)
ODMR$WFJOB4368
MINING_DATA_BUILD_V1
19/07/13 21:56:11
START(NODE)
ODMR$WFJOB4368
MINING_DATA_BUILD_V1
19/07/13 21:56:11
START(WORKFLOW)
ODMR$WFJOB4368
19/07/13 21:55:57
Is there are way to automatically expand the all the Workflow Editor tabs, or is there a setting to do this.  Otherwise I have to expand them each time I go into ODM.   I should have asked for/about something like this before now.
I've make the memory changes to the SQL Dev VM as you suggested and it seems to have made a difference and getting the response that I'm used to.
Message was edited by: Brendan