Eb prefix mandatory for inbound ebMS?

Hi,
I am testing Oracle B2B 11g with an ebMS client that does not use the prefix eb for the ebMS namespace.
This clients uses
xmlns:ns4="http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/ebxml-msg/schema/msg-header-2_0.xsd"
instead of
xmlns:eb="http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/ebxml-msg/schema/msg-header-2_0.xsd"
I believe this is a problem for Oracle B2B when resolving the party type.
In the log I see EBMSExchangePlugin: processParty: party type is null, setting it as ebmsIdentifier.
In the wire message we have <ns4:PartyId ns4:type="urn:osb:oin">12345678</ns4:PartyId>In the same way it is a problem to extract the service from<ns4:Service ns4:type="urn:osb:services">afleverservice</ns4:Service>which results in "B2B-51928: Message header validation failed. The received Service Type does not match with the configured {1}"
Is this a bug? Am I missing something?
Groeten,
HJH

OK Anuj.
Here is the packed message that is processed succesfully.
After changing eb to another prefix I get B2B-51928
Message header validation failed. The received Service Type does not match with the configured {1}
After reverting this change the message is processed succesfully again.
Groeten,
HJH
------=_Part_34_11367412.1302157461593
Content-Type: text/xml; charset=UTF-8
Content-Id: <soappart>
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?><SOAP-ENV:Envelope xmlns:SOAP-ENV="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/ http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/ebxml-msg/schema/envelope.xsd"><SOAP-ENV:Header xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/ebxml-msg/schema/msg-header-2_0.xsd http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/ebxml-msg/schema/msg-header-2_0.xsd"><eb:MessageHeader xmlns:eb="http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/ebxml-msg/schema/msg-header-2_0.xsd" SOAP-ENV:mustUnderstand="1" eb:version="2.0"><eb:From><eb:PartyId eb:type="ebMS Identifier">33445566</eb:PartyId></eb:From><eb:To><eb:PartyId eb:type="ebMS Identifier">12345678</eb:PartyId></eb:To><eb:CPAId>CPA_Afleverservice</eb:CPAId><eb:ConversationId>12424</eb:ConversationId><eb:Service eb:type="urn:osb:services">afleverservice</eb:Service><eb:Action>afleveren</eb:Action><eb:MessageData><eb:MessageId>[email protected]</eb:MessageId><eb:Timestamp>2011-04-07T08:24:21.515+02:00</eb:Timestamp></eb:MessageData><eb:DuplicateElimination/></eb:MessageHeader><eb:AckRequested xmlns:eb="http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/ebxml-msg/schema/msg-header-2_0.xsd" SOAP-ENV:actor="urn:oasis:names:tc:ebxml-msg:actor:toPartyMSH" SOAP-ENV:mustUnderstand="1" eb:signed="false" eb:version="2.0"/></SOAP-ENV:Header><SOAP-ENV:Body xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/ebxml-msg/schema/msg-header-2_0.xsd http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/ebxml-msg/schema/msg-header-2_0.xsd"><eb:Manifest xmlns:eb="http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/ebxml-msg/schema/msg-header-2_0.xsd" eb:version="2.0"><eb:Reference eb:id="Payload-0" xlink:href="cid:Payload-0" xlink:type="simple"/></eb:Manifest></SOAP-ENV:Body></SOAP-ENV:Envelope>
------=_Part_34_11367412.1302157461593
Content-Type: text/xml; charset=us-ascii
Content-ID: <Payload-0>
<hallo><hallo>over?</hallo></hallo>
------=_Part_34_11367412.1302157461593--

Similar Messages

  • Making Order Acknowledgement (AB) a mandatory for Inbound delivery

    Dear All
    Kindly let me know wether is it possible to make the order acknowledgement a mandatory  before creating an Inbound Delivery.
    I.e., with OA the inbound delivery is not tpo be created by user.
    If it is possible please revert your answer
    Regards
    Chaitanya

    It is not possible to make the 'AB' as mandetory in confimation in PO before creating inbound delivery but while creating inbound delivery u can check whether AB is created in PO in userexit of delivery  mv50afz1 and control user to create the inbound del if there is no ab created.

  • Mandatory fields for inbound delivery idocs

    hi all
    i want to generate inbound idocs for inbound delivery ASN
    i am using message type DESADV and idoc type /AFS/DELVRY03
    in order to generate inbound idoc what are mandatory values i have to pass to the idocs
    thanks
    Anil

    HI,
    I created inbound idoc for ASN Inbound delivery in test mode we19
    i got idoc with status 62, when i am trying to process the idoc in bd87, its allowing me
    is there any other way to process the idocs , so that status will be 53
    thanks

  • SAP System inconsistency for Inbound delivery / MIGO and a "sap note"

    Hello Friends ,
    After following SAP instruction on how to remove the inconsistency between posting GR through MIGO (Inv. mang.) and the reflection of the goods movement status in the inbound delivery document - done that using sap note 570991
    the problem is that the system start behaving in a weird way throwing unjustified Error messages for any suggested goods receipt using MIGO with reference to inbound
    for example after creating an inbound delivery document and trying to post it via migo , an error will pop up
    - Inbound delivery storage location cannot be changed to here Message no. VLA316
    the thing is i didn't even maintain any storage location entry up to that point and yet i cannot post any stock !!
    also another error  like
    - Inbound delivery batch cannot be changed to *** here
    which doesn't make any sense because there is not batches in the inbound document !!
    i think this behavior is coming from the "Document Flow Update for Stock Postings" inbound  indicator  at the shipping parameter at client level customization
    i need help on  how to overcome this annoying SAP Bug/Problem specially i am in a post go live critical situation

    Hi,
       The messages you mentioned were introduced to avoid inconsistency between inbound delivery and IM, through the note:  1050944 - GR for inbound delivery using inventory mgmt as of ECC 6.00
       If the messages are issued incorrectly, then you may check for SAP notes (I couldnt find anything relevant) or raise an OSS ticket to SAP.
    Regards,
    AKPT

  • WBS element field mandatory for specific sales order

    Hi Friends,
    I want to make the WBS element field in sale order line item to be mandatory for a specific sales order type. I am not able to add this field in incompletion log also. So can anyone let me know the solution for this.
    Ratna

    Hi,
    As solution suggest above is correct use VBAP table and Field is PS_PSP_PNR into ur incompletion log and assign this procedure to ur Item category. And If u want to WBS element check at header level the use VBAK table and field PS_PSP_PNR and assign this incompletion log to ur sales document type.
    Once more setting is required to stop the order from saving if incompletion check is unsucessful, for that you need to check a checkbox named "Incomplete. Message" in VOV8 tcode, for ur perticular sales document types.
    Hope this will resolve ur problem.
    rgds
    Dhiraj

  • Automatic TO Creation for Inbound Deliveries

    I would like to have TO created automatically for Inbound delivery for PO.
    1)  I have set the Automatic TO = A in Mvmt Type 101 for my warehouse in transaction OMKZ. 
    2)  I have set Immediate TO Creation and Mail Control = A for Mvmt Type 101, Mvmt Indicator =B, Mvmt Type 101, TR Create =X for my warehouse in transaction OMKX
    3)  I have assigned Routine #32 to Application E1 in transaction VOFM
    4)  I have created output conditon WMTA for delivery type EL with Medium =8 and Date/Time =4.
    Tranfer order is not created when the delivery is created via transaction VL34.  The output determination analysis indicates that WMTA was ignored because requirement 032 not fulfilled.  What am I missing?
    Thank you.

    Hi Julie Simonds
    I believe you are working with Inbound delivery with Item catagory as ELN.
    Please check if Relevant for putaway is checked.
    Path for your refernce :
    SPRO > LE > Shipping > Deliveries > Define Item catagory for deliveries.
    Thanks,
    Mahesh

  • New Condition TAble for Inbound Delivery

    Hello
    i want to maintain a new Condition table for the Inbound delivery picking with the combination of _Delivery type/Plant
    so that the Inbound created for the particular plant alone uses the particular output type.
    Where in IMG can i configure the new Condition table for this combination for the Inbound delivery ?

    Hi,
    Go to SPRO > Logistics Execution > Shipping > Basic Shipping Functions > Output Control > Output Determination > Maintain Output Determination for Inbound Deliveries > Here perform following;
    - Define Condition Table for Inbound Delivery
    - Define Output Types for Inbound Delivery
    - Define Access Sequence for Inbound Delivery
    - Maintain Output Determination Procedure
    - Assign Output Determination Procedures

  • Error while Check-in DC's on NWDI: No Prefix found for DC

    Hi,
    I receive the following error when I try to check-in a CAF DC creation activity on the DTR.
    FAILED: No prefix found for development component "vendorname/name_A/caf/dictionary".
    Appropriate development component prefix should be configured in SLD (Restart IDE after reconfiguring SLD).;
    No prefix found for development component "vendorname/name_A/caf/ejbmodule".
    Appropriate development component prefix should be configured in SLD (Restart IDE after reconfiguring SLD).;
    No prefix found for development component "vendorname/name_A/caf/ear".
    Appropriate development component prefix should be configured in SLD (Restart IDE after reconfiguring SLD).;
    No prefix found for development component "vendorname/name_A/caf/permissions".
    Appropriate development component prefix should be configured in SLD (Restart IDE after reconfiguring SLD).;
    No prefix found for development component "vendorname/name_A/caf/metadata".
    Appropriate development component prefix should be configured in SLD (Restart IDE after reconfiguring SLD).;
    Project "vendorname.name_A.caf": No prefix found for table file "XAP_COM_MOD_COMP_S".
    Try the default table prefix "XAP", or contact your SLD administrators for appropriate DB object prefix (Restart IDE after reconfiguring SLD).;
    Project "vendorname.name_A.caf": No prefix found for table file "XAP_COM_MOD_COMP_T".
    Try the default table prefix "XAP", or contact your SLD administrators for appropriate DB object prefix (Restart IDE after reconfiguring SLD).
    In NWDS If I create a new DC the name prefix field is disabled.
    On the SLD I have created the name prefix --> "vendorname/name_A" and restarted the SLD.
    I am using NWDS 7.1 SP05.
    Do I miss any configuration steps?
    Thanks,
    Regards,
    Yasar

    Hi,
    The issue is solved.
    The name server for the NWDI System was not configured on the SLD under Technical Landscapes. After defining the NWDI System and configuring the name server, I restarted the SLD Server and updated the CMS.
    Now Check - In and Check -Out of CAF DC's are working fine. If I define a new DC the name prefix is also editable and NWDS provides me my defined name prefixes in the name prefix combobox.
    Regards,
    Yasar

  • Error Message FMBAS202 Year of cash effectivity mandatory for budget cat 9G

    Hi all,
    I activated BCS and use update profile 000350 (Separate PB/CB budget lines; standard), we tried to post simple FI posting and the error come up
    ==============================================================
    Year of cash effectivity mandatory for budget category 9G
    Message no. FMBAS202
    Diagnosis
    The FM update profile does not support the year of cash effectivity for commitment/actual values (posting ledger 9B). However, the year of cash effectivity is mandatory in BCS budgeting for budget category 9G and FM area 0100: the minimum value in this case is 2009.
    System Response
    Processing of the commitment/actual data record stops.
    Procedure
    Deactivate the year of cash effectivity for the corresponding budget category 9G and FM area 0100 in the IMG activity Choose Budget Category.
    ===============================================================
    So I click the link and it goes to Define Budget Category screen where we assign budget category (9G) and time horizon (1) to a FM area, but not mention of deactivating year of cash activity.
    My question is:
    1. Where is the button to deactivate the year of cash effectivity?
    2. What's the difference between budget category 9B and 9G? Both are Commitment Budget.
    3. I dont remember assigning budget category 9B to an FM area. Where is the setting?
    Thanks

    Hi,
    When you go to IMG - Public Sector Management - Funds Management Government - Budget Control System (BCS) - BCS Budgeting - Basic Settings - Definition of Budget Data - Choose Budget Category, what's the settings for 'Time horizon' field? It should be blank for 9G(commitment), if you don't work with cash effectivity.
    9B is posting ledger, while 9G is budget ledger. You don't have to assign 9A/9B to FM area.
    Regards,
    Eli

  • Org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: The prefix "c" for element "c:set" is not bo

    Hi,
    When deploying the ADF aaplication in glassfish server getting error like,
    [#|2012-12-03T14:21:53.586+0530|INFO|glassfish3.1.2|oracle.j2ee.jsp|_ThreadID=22;_ThreadName=Thread-2;|unable to dispatch JSP page: The following exception occurred:.
    oracle.jsp.parse.JspParseException:
    Error: Validator com.sun.faces.taglib.jsf_core.CoreValidator reports:
    org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: The prefix "c" for element "c:set" is not bound.
         at oracle.jsp.parse.OracleJsp2Java.reportValidationMsgs(OracleJsp2Java.java:777)
         at oracle.jsp.parse.OracleJsp2Java.invokeValidator(OracleJsp2Java.java:755)
         at oracle.jsp.parse.OracleJsp2Java.checkJspTagLibValidator(OracleJsp2Java.java:653)
         at oracle.jsp.parse.OracleJsp2Java.transformImpl(OracleJsp2Java.java:522)
         at oracle.jsp.parse.OracleJsp2Java.transform(OracleJsp2Java.java:593)
         at oracle.jsp.runtimev2.JspPageCompiler.attemptCompilePage(JspPageCompiler.java:691)
         at oracle.jsp.runtimev2.JspPageCompiler.compileBothModes(JspPageCompiler.java:490)
         at oracle.jsp.runtimev2.JspPageCompiler.parseAndGetTreeNode(JspPageCompiler.java:457)
         at oracle.jsp.runtimev2.JspPageInfo.compileAndLoad(JspPageInfo.java:624)
         at oracle.jsp.runtimev2.JspPageTable.compileAndServe(JspPageTable.java:645)
         at oracle.jsp.runtimev2.JspPageTable.service(JspPageTable.java:385)
         at oracle.jsp.runtimev2.JspServlet.internalService(JspServlet.java:810)
         at oracle.jsp.runtimev2.JspServlet.service(JspServlet.java:734)
         at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:770)
         at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapper.service(StandardWrapper.java:1542)
         at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:343)
         at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:217)
         at oracle.adf.library.webapp.LibraryFilter.doFilter(LibraryFilter.java:180)
         at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:256)
         at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:217)
         at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationDispatcher.doInvoke(ApplicationDispatcher.java:807)
         at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationDispatcher.invoke(ApplicationDispatcher.java:671)
         at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationDispatcher.processRequest(ApplicationDispatcher.java:505)
         at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationDispatcher.doDispatch(ApplicationDispatcher.java:476)
         at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationDispatcher.dispatch(ApplicationDispatcher.java:355)
         at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationDispatcher.forward(ApplicationDispatcher.java:305)
         at com.sun.faces.context.ExternalContextImpl.dispatch(ExternalContextImpl.java:546)
         at javax.faces.context.ExternalContextWrapper.dispatch(ExternalContextWrapper.java:93)
         at javax.faces.context.ExternalContextWrapper.dispatch(ExternalContextWrapper.java:93)
         at oracle.adfinternal.view.faces.config.rich.RecordRequestAttributesDuringDispatch.dispatch(RecordRequestAttributesDuringDispatch.java:44)
         at javax.faces.context.ExternalContextWrapper.dispatch(ExternalContextWrapper.java:93)
         at javax.faces.context.ExternalContextWrapper.dispatch(ExternalContextWrapper.java:93)
         at javax.faces.context.ExternalContextWrapper.dispatch(ExternalContextWrapper.java:93)
         at org.apache.myfaces.trinidadinternal.context.FacesContextFactoryImpl$OverrideDispatch.dispatch(FacesContextFactoryImpl.java:167)
         at com.sun.faces.application.view.JspViewHandlingStrategy.executePageToBuildView(JspViewHandlingStrategy.java:363)
         at com.sun.faces.application.view.JspViewHandlingStrategy.buildView(JspViewHandlingStrategy.java:154)
         at org.apache.myfaces.trinidadinternal.application.ViewDeclarationLanguageFactoryImpl$ChangeApplyingVDLWrapper.buildView(ViewDeclarationLanguageFactoryImpl.java:341)
         at oracle.adfinternal.view.faces.lifecycle.LifecycleImpl._renderResponse(LifecycleImpl.java:990)
         at oracle.adfinternal.view.faces.lifecycle.LifecycleImpl._executePhase(LifecycleImpl.java:342)
         at oracle.adfinternal.view.faces.lifecycle.LifecycleImpl.render(LifecycleImpl.java:236)
         at javax.faces.webapp.FacesServlet.service(FacesServlet.java:509)
         at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapper.service(StandardWrapper.java:1542)
         at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:343)
         at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:217)
         at oracle.adf.model.servlet.ADFBindingFilter.doFilter(ADFBindingFilter.java:173)
         at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:256)
         at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:217)
         at oracle.adfinternal.view.faces.webapp.rich.RegistrationFilter.doFilter(RegistrationFilter.java:125)
         at org.apache.myfaces.trinidadinternal.webapp.TrinidadFilterImpl$FilterListChain.doFilter(TrinidadFilterImpl.java:468)
         at oracle.adfinternal.view.faces.activedata.AdsFilter.doFilter(AdsFilter.java:60)
         at org.apache.myfaces.trinidadinternal.webapp.TrinidadFilterImpl$FilterListChain.doFilter(TrinidadFilterImpl.java:468)
         at org.apache.myfaces.trinidadinternal.webapp.TrinidadFilterImpl._doFilterImpl(TrinidadFilterImpl.java:293)
         at org.apache.myfaces.trinidadinternal.webapp.TrinidadFilterImpl.doFilter(TrinidadFilterImpl.java:199)
         at org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.webapp.TrinidadFilter.doFilter(TrinidadFilter.java:92)
         at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:256)
         at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:217)
         at com.ge.ohr.dm.ui.sessionHandler.GEDMSessionExpiryHandler.doFilter(GEDMSessionExpiryHandler.java:61)
         at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:256)
         at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:217)
         at com.ge.ohr.dm.ui.filter.GEDMSecurityFilter.doFilter(GEDMSecurityFilter.java:173)
         at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:256)
         at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:217)
    The code which in .jspx page is like;
    <jsp:root xmlns:jsp="http://java.sun.com/JSP/Page" version="2.1"
    xmlns:f="http://java.sun.com/jsf/core"
    xmlns:c="http://java.sun.com/jsp/jstl/core"
    xmlns:af="http://xmlns.oracle.com/adf/faces/rich"
    xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
    <c:set var="gedmuiBundle" value="#{adfBundle['com.ge.ohr.dm.ui.UIBundle']}"/>
    When including the 'xmlns:c="http://java.sun.com/jsp/jstl/core' it shows the error;
    The server encountered an internal error (OracleJSP error: oracle.jsp.parse.JspParseException: <br>Error: Validator com.sun.faces.taglib.jsf_core.CoreValidator reports:<br>org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: The prefix "c" for element "c:set" is not bound.<br>) that prevented it from fulfilling this request.
    Please help me on this.
    Thanks and Regards
    Binsy

    This is an ADF application, so you will probably find more help in the JDeveloper and ADF forum here:
    JDeveloper and ADF
    Best Regards,
    Chris

  • IDOC for inbound delivery

    Hi Gurus,
    Pls help me to understand this functionality:
    Shipments destined for a Distribution Center will generate ASNu2019s(advance shipping notification) to alert the Distribution Center  to the upcoming receipt.
    There are two variations of the transaction that will initiate the ASN:
    u2022  Receipt of an ASN from a vendor to a Distribution Center  will result in the creation of an Inbound Delivery.  That Inbound Delivery must be sent to WM via  IDOC.
    u2022  Shipments from Distribution Center to DC will create an Outbound Delivery from the u201CClose Loadu201D process in Warehouse M.  Creation of the Outbound Delivery to another DC is the trigger for the IDOC to WM.
    The IDOC to be used could be a variation of the DELVRY03.
    My doubts includes:
    1. can I use one idoc for both the scenarios?
    2. both are outbound idocs or not?
    3. Any suggestions how to do this?
    Thanks..
    SD

    >
    Shibu David wrote:
    > My doubts includes:
    > 1. can I use one idoc for both the scenarios?
    Yes you can use IDOC DELVRY03 for both scenarios
    >
    Shibu David wrote:
    > 2. both are outbound idocs or not?
    No.
    ASN sent to DC will be outbound message.
    ASN received by DC, which creates Inbound delivery is inbound message.
    >
    Shibu David wrote:
    > 3. Any suggestions how to do this?
    As far as I know message type used in SAP for ASN is DESADV.
    For inbound ASN use process code DELS and for outbound use DELV

  • Confirmation control key check for inbound delivery creation

    Hi,
    Currently, in the Client's company, the process of receiving goods from purchase orders looks like that (SAP-wise):
    - create a purchase order,
    - receive goods using MIGO and automatically create an inbound delivery,
    - pack the delivery and post goods receipt.
    Recently, some patches have been installed, including one described by note 1602047 (which basically enforces checking confirmation control keys if goods receipt assignment and goods receipt relevance are activated for inbound deliveries). Note says that it only affects two-step stock transfer and creation of automatic inbound deliveries using SPED output but it seems it also affects other basic processes like PO receipt in MIGO.
    Now, when using the old control key (that had MRP-Relevant and GR-Relevant fields checked), the system is unable to automatically create an inbound delivery after the goods receipt is posted with MIGO (with message VL148 - Not possible to create an inbound delivery). I learned that this is because the "GR Assignment" field must be checked in the confirmation control key so it's possible to automatically create aninbound delivery after receiving a purchase order in MIGO.
    After changing the confirmation control key to have the missing field checked it's not possible anymore to receive goods from PO in MIGO as the PO requires shipping notification in order to be processed in MIGO thus requiring of manual creation of an inbound delivery.
    Is there any way to skip this check so the process would remain the same (this model has been working fine for few years in the Client's system) and the inbound delievery would be created automatically after posting the receipt in MIGO?
    Thanks in advance,
    Piotr

    Hi,
    don't know if you found a solution, but we received the following message from SAP:
    The advent of the new version requires some attention to the users. It
    was necessary to avoid inconsistencies which in the past version the
    system was susceptible.
    Main Program SAPMM07M
    Source code of MM07MLVS
    sy-msgid VL sy-msgty E sy-msgno 148
    I have checked the process and through debugged I could confirm the
    following information SAP is providing to all similar incidents reportedfor us:
    Error message VL 148 is issued if in the confirmation control key used
    in the purchase order, the fields for MRP-relevance (T163G-KZDIS),
    GR relevance (T163G-WEREL) and GR assignment indicator (T163G-WEZUO)
    are not set.
    The correction of note 1602047 was necessary to avoid inconsistencies
    (table EKES) in the purchase order. Without having the GR assignment
    (T163G-WEZUO) set, there is no unique reference created between the
    purchase order history (table EKBE) and the inbound delivery
    confirmation (table EKES) at goods receipt which leads to a problem if
    several inbound deliveries exist for the same purchase order.
    If you set T163G-WEZUO to 'X', this assures that, for an inbound
    delivery, the confirmation record (EKES) belonging to this inbound
    delivery (EKES-VBELN) is also accurately updated at goods receipt.
    How to solve the issue?
    Use a confirmation control key with the GR assignment indicator set
    and then create the inbound delivery with VL31N. If you want to be able
    to create the inbound delivery with reference to a certain line item in
    the PO, use transaction VL34.
    If you still want to use transaction MIGO, there is the following
    workaround:
    - Create a purchase order without any confirmation control key
    - Create a goods receipt (GR) in transaction MIGO with reference to this PO and post the GR to a non-HU-managed storage location
    - Create a transfer posting with MIGO using movement type 311 to
    transfer the goods from the non-HU-managed storage location to the
    HU-managed storage location.
    As the transfer posting is an additional step for the user, the whole
    process could be automated using a partner storage location
    (T001l-PARLG) for the GR which then triggers (through a modification)
    the BAPI 'BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE' to create the transfer posting without
    user interaction.
    I hope to have satisfied you on the reason why it is now happening and
    also I believe you can explain to business that it is a new behavior
    necessary done from SAP side to avoid worse situations, we are aware of
    potential dissatisfaction it might cause. SAP Support is always
    available to clarify any issue.
    Sorry for not having a more positive answer.
    I hope it helps!
    Leentje

  • Issue at the time of creation of transfer order for inbound delivery

    Hello,
    I am facing one issue at the time of creation of transfer order for inbound delivery.
    If I create inbound delivery for purchase order with account assignment as 'M' (Ind. cust. w/o KD-CO), inbound delivery is not updated. Also document flow for inbounde delivery s not updated. I can create N number of transfer orders for on inbound delivery. Need help to resolve issue.
    If I create inbound delivery for purchase order with account assignment other than 'M' (Ind. cust. w/o KD-CO), inbound delivery and document flow is updated.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Nikhil

    Hi
    In OMS2 t-code
    for your material type and  plant ,you have to mark value based and qunaity based updation mark
    Regards
    kailas Ugale

  • Post Goods Receipt for Inbound Delivery using WHSCON IDoc

    Dear All
    Currently I am working on a big project dealing with EDI connections to our logistics partner for the Export business. The entire message flow between Lindt and our partner should be via EDI. Our SAP release is (still) 4.6c.
    We will create two kinds of despatch advice messages, one for inbound deliveries and one for outbound deliveries for customers.
    I would appreciate your support in the following problem that I am facing with the inbound delivery scenario:
    We create stock transport orders (purchase orders, POs) for the goods intended to be delivered into the plant at our partner
    We create a delivery (type NL = replenishment delivery) for this POs
    As soon as we post the goods issue we send the despatch advice (as EANCOM D96A DESADV message) to our partner.
    At this point the delivery is basically completed, i.e. packing status (PS) and goods movement status (GM / GS) are equal to 'C' (= completed).
    Our logistics partner uses the same EDI message to send us the goods receipts data, e.g.:
    We dispatched 50 units of a product => QTY:50:12
    The partner received indeed 50 units => QVR:50:66
    Please note that we do not use the QVR segment for the quantity difference (between despatched and received quantity) but it contains the received units. This way we avoid negative values in the QVR segment.
    When the logistics partner sends back the DESADV message containing the received quantities (QVR segment) we want to make
    the goods receipts for the products in the original stock transport order and
    upate the message flow in the delivery
    My idea was to transform the incoming DESADV message into a WHSCON.DELVRY03 IDoc based on the documentation in: [Delivery Interface|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_crm40/helpdata/en/e2/654b15a9f411d184ec0000e81ddea0/content.htm]
    In the delivery header control E1EDL18 I used QUALF = 'PGI' (Post goods issue).
    I prepared an inbound WHSCON IDoc according to the documentation mentioned below. I managed to get some feedback from the Idoc processing implying that the system tried to do the goods receipt in the PO but failed.
    To make a long story short here are my questions:
    Can an inbound WHSCON IDoc used for doing both the goods receipt in the PO and the update of the message flow in the delivery?
    Does anybody have an example on how to fill the WHSCON IDoc?
    Or is my approach a cul-de-sac ?
    Kind Regards
       Uwe
    PS: A related question can be found here: Goods Receipt in PO AND Message Flow Update in Inb. Delivery using WMMBXY

    Hi Uwe,
    Can an inbound WHSCON IDoc used for doing both the goods receipt in the PO and the update of the message flow in the delivery?
    The binary answer would be no. You should use WMMBXY or MBGMCR instead.
    But if we are doing goods receipt against Inbound delivery then answer is YES with additionally E1EDL18-QUALF = 'PIC' populated. But please remember no partial receipt is possible against Inbound Delivery.
    We should populate E1EDL20-VBELN with our Inbound delivery number and line item info should go to E1EDL24.
    I have done a similar interface recently where we are doing receipt against Inbound delivery. But our case was a bit complex because we had to support against Inbound delivery. So we had to go for a custom solution on top of IDOC_INPUT_DELVRY.
    Hope this helps. Let me know if you have more questions.
    Regards,
    Rudra

  • Goods Receipt for Inbound Delivery before Transfer Order

    Hello Experts,
    Below is the normal process in case of GR via inbound delivery.
    PO -> Inbound Delivery -> TO -> Confirm TO -> Post Goods Receipt in Delivery.
    My client wants as per the normal Purchase Order cycle as below.
    PO -> Inbound Delivery -> Post goods receipt in Delivery -> TO - > Confirm TO.
    I have found some config for this as per below path.
    Logistics - General -> Handling Unit Management -> Basics -> Delivery -> Define Sequence of Transfer Order - Goods Receipt.
    I have done these settings but still it is not working.
    I have couple of questions here.
    1. Are there some more settings required?
    2. Why SAP has designed this process in such a way for inbound delivery.
    Thanks in advance for your help.
    Navin

    Hi,
    I am working with non HU managed storage location. Can I still use this settings & process for inbound delivery?
    I am stuck with one more question. SAP is not allowing me to create Inbound delivery for QM active materials.
    The message it is saying is ....
    Material CH-1440 1000 cannot be used in inbound delivery because QM is active
    Message no. L9528
    Diagnosis
    QM is active for material CH-1440 in plant 1000. As a result, the material cannot be used in an inbound delivery item because the item is relevant for picking and because WM is active for the item.
    This process is not supported in the current release.
    Procedure
    Execute the putaway using a goods receipt posting with subsequent
    putaway in the Warehouse Management system.
    Can you please help me with this one also?

Maybe you are looking for