Edge composition loads perfectly, but it needs long time to load. Why?

Hello again,
the edge animate composition loads perfectly, but it needs around 12 seconds to load. Can someone here explain me if there is problem something in the code below or anything else?
It demonstrates sticky menu. Plugin used from garand sticky.
This is the code:
<!doctype html>
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="X-UA-Compatible" content="IE=Edge">
<script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8" src="edge_includes/edge.5.0.1.min.js"></script>
<title>Sticky Plugin</title>
<script type="text/javascript" src="http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.4.2/jquery.min.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="jquery.sticky.js"></script>
<script>
    $(window).load(function(){
      $("#sticker").sticky({ topSpacing: 0 });
</script>
<style>
    body {
      height: 10000px;
      padding: 0;
      margin: 0;
</style>

<style>
          .edgeLoad-EDGE-16697612 { visibility:hidden; }
</style>
<script>
   AdobeEdge.loadComposition('Untitled-1', 'EDGE-16697612', {
    scaleToFit: "none",
    centerStage: "none",
    minW: "0",
    maxW: "undefined",
    width: "550px",
    height: "400px"
}, {dom: [ ]}, {dom: [ ]});
</script>

</head>
<body>
<p>This is test this is text this is text at the top.</p>
<div id='sticker' class='clearfix'>
        
        <div id="Stage" class="EDGE-16697612">
    </div>
        
</div>
<p>This is test this is text this is text at the bottom.</p>
</body>
</html>
Thanks,
CP
EA version CC 2014.1.1

Hi Rani,
I have had similar experience of adding huge group of users to the collaboration rooms. I was in a situation where around 22,000 users had to be added and we were on SPS16 believe me it consumes a lot of time to add users of this size, we upgraded to SPS18 and the issue was resolved as SPS17 and upwards allows you to add user groups. In your case when you add user groups, the users in the group are expanded and added to the room maintenance page hence the loading is so slow and the same thing happens again if you make any changes and save. I sincerely suggested upgrading as I have gone through the similar situation.
About SAP webdispatcher, you are thinking in the right direction if your requirement is load balancing. Accessing portal through internet is another dimension to it. Do you know how many users will be accessing it through internet? Have you already explored alternates like VPN ( if the user base is not too large)?
Message was edited by:
Anupama ghorpade

Similar Messages

I am trying to update my ipad mini but taking too long time 5 hours

i am trying to update my ipad mini to ios 7 but taking too long time 5 hours so what i have to do
Message was edited by: GOPAL DHRUW

You can try resetting your iPad by simultaneously pressing and holding the Home and Sleep/Wake buttons until you see the Apple Logo. This can take up to 15 seconds so be patient and don't release the buttons until the logo appears.
Try again to see if the problem persists.

I have enabled junk mail filtering to move designated junk mail to junk mailbox when it arrives. But it no longer does so. Why not? I am using an iMac with version 10.10.1

I have enabled junk mail filtering to move designated junk mail to junk mailbox when it arrives. But it no longer does so. Why not? I am using an iMac with version 10.10.1

Try resetting the Junk Mail filter. This will start it on a new learning curve. Mail/Preferences/Junk Mail.

HT201304 my i phone says its disabled until i die just jokes but for a long time and i cant figure out what to do its my phone

my i phone says its disabled until i die just jokes but for a long time and i cant figure out what to do its my phone

Follow the instructions in this support document for a disabled iPhone. iOS: Forgot passcode or device disabled

Time Machine/Time Capsule backups successful, but take a long time

I purchased a 512GB Time Capsule about a year ago. Since I got it, backups have been successful, but very slow. An average backup takes about 40-50 minutes, usually for less than 20 MB transferred.
Here are a couple summaries of recent backups (see end of post for full logs):
BACKUP 1:
11 minutes to detect if pre-backup thinning was necessary
18 minutes to copy 281 MB
5 minutes to copy 5.4 MB
4 minutes to start post-backup thinning
2 minutes to delete 1 expired backup
There were no error messages.
BACKUP 2:
4 minutes to detect if pre-backup thinning was necessary
12 minutes to copy 15 MB
5 minutes to detect if pre-backup thinning was necessary
15 minutes to copy 3.8 MB
1 minutes to start post-backup thinning
2 minutes to delete 1 expired backup
This time, there were error messages about "Unable to rebuild path cache for source item. Partial source path:"
My Time Capsule is placed about 5 feet from my laptop, with no obstructions between them. I don't think it's a wireless speed issue, because I use the Time Capsule as my router, and my connection to the net is fine. Also, operations that don't require wireless connections, like detecting pre-backup thinning, also take a long time.
Does anyone have any idea what might be going wrong to cause my regular backups to take so long?
BACKUP 1:
14/09/09 2:09:47 PM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[18612] Starting standard backup
14/09/09 2:09:55 PM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[18612] Mounted network destination using URL: afp://Peter%[email protected]/turban
14/09/09 2:09:55 PM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[18612] Backup destination mounted at path: /Volumes/turban
14/09/09 2:10:02 PM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[18612] Disk image /Volumes/turban/buttercup_001ec2146608.sparsebundle mounted at: /Volumes/Backup of buttercup
14/09/09 2:10:02 PM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[18612] Backing up to: /Volumes/Backup of buttercup/Backups.backupdb
14/09/09 2:21:15 PM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[18612] No pre-backup thinning needed: 860.3 MB requested (including padding), 280.02 GB available
14/09/09 2:39:05 PM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[18612] Copied 12159 files (281.3 MB) from volume butternut.
14/09/09 2:39:08 PM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[18612] No pre-backup thinning needed: 529.5 MB requested (including padding), 280.02 GB available
14/09/09 2:44:18 PM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[18612] Copied 11775 files (5.4 MB) from volume butternut.
14/09/09 2:48:43 PM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[18612] Starting post-backup thinning
14/09/09 2:50:11 PM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[18612] Deleted backup /Volumes/Backup of buttercup/Backups.backupdb/buttercup/2009-09-13-132947: 280.02 GB now available
14/09/09 2:50:11 PM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[18612] Post-back up thinning complete: 1 expired backups removed
14/09/09 2:50:11 PM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[18612] Backup completed successfully.
14/09/09 2:50:18 PM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[18612] Ejected Time Machine disk image.
14/09/09 2:50:22 PM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[18612] Ejected Time Machine network volume.
BACKUP 2:
14/09/09 9:09:46 AM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[15833] Starting standard backup
14/09/09 9:09:54 AM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[15833] Mounted network destination using URL: afp://Peter%[email protected]/turban
14/09/09 9:09:54 AM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[15833] Backup destination mounted at path: /Volumes/turban
14/09/09 9:10:07 AM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[15833] Disk image /Volumes/turban/buttercup_001ec2146608.sparsebundle mounted at: /Volumes/Backup of buttercup
14/09/09 9:10:10 AM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[15833] Backing up to: /Volumes/Backup of buttercup/Backups.backupdb
14/09/09 9:14:06 AM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[15833] No pre-backup thinning needed: 542.2 MB requested (including padding), 280.02 GB available
14/09/09 9:23:27 AM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[15833] Unable to rebuild path cache for source item. Partial source path:
14/09/09 9:23:27 AM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[15833] Unable to rebuild path cache for source item. Partial source path:
14/09/09 9:24:30 AM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[15833] Unable to rebuild path cache for source item. Partial source path:
14/09/09 9:24:30 AM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[15833] Unable to rebuild path cache for source item. Partial source path:
14/09/09 9:26:00 AM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[15833] Copied 1223 files (15.3 MB) from volume butternut.
14/09/09 9:31:35 AM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[15833] No pre-backup thinning needed: 527.5 MB requested (including padding), 280.02 GB available
14/09/09 9:46:07 AM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[15833] Unable to rebuild path cache for source item. Partial source path:
14/09/09 9:46:07 AM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[15833] Unable to rebuild path cache for source item. Partial source path:
14/09/09 9:46:07 AM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[15833] Unable to rebuild path cache for source item. Partial source path:
14/09/09 9:46:07 AM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[15833] Unable to rebuild path cache for source item. Partial source path:
14/09/09 9:46:20 AM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[15833] Copied 11336 files (3.8 MB) from volume butternut.
14/09/09 9:47:06 AM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[15833] Starting post-backup thinning
14/09/09 9:49:14 AM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[15833] Deleted backup /Volumes/Backup of buttercup/Backups.backupdb/buttercup/2009-09-13-082428: 280.02 GB now available
14/09/09 9:49:14 AM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[15833] Post-back up thinning complete: 1 expired backups removed
14/09/09 9:49:15 AM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[15833] Backup completed successfully.
14/09/09 9:49:19 AM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[15833] Ejected Time Machine disk image.
14/09/09 9:49:25 AM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[15833] Ejected Time Machine network volume.

peterjm wrote:
I checked all of the steps in #D2 of the Troubleshooting Guide.
One other thing thing you might try, is a +*Verify Disk+* (not permissions) on your internal HD. That will not take anything like 40 hours! If it reports problems, you'll have to boot from your Install disc and use it's copy of DU to repair it. Post back if you need to do this but aren't sure how.
I think it's very fishy that Repair Disk took 40 hours -- it seems like any operation that touches the hard drive on the Time Capsule takes a long time. Maybe the hard drive is having problems? What sort of problems could a drive have that would make everything VERY slow, but still successful?
Try connecting via an Ethernet cable; see what effect that has. Everything should be faster, of course, but not wildly. Just as an example, I'm doing backups to a USB hard drive via my Airport Extreme, about 15 feet from my iMac. When I first started that way, I did a full backup via Ethernet (about 21 gb/hour), then erased it and ran again wirelessly (about 12 gb/hour).
Even 5 feet apart, you may have some sort of interference or other communications problem; if Ethernet is many times faster, then you may need to have your TC and/or wireless card examined.

OD-Clientusers need long time to login

Hi there,
I hope, I can get some help here...
Running an OD-Master (10.5.8) with nor replikas, I have the problem, that sometimes the User-Login needs some minutes for successfull login.
What I can do to solve the problem for the moment is to remove and reconnect the clients to the server. But this doesn't solve the problem permanent.
The DNS is running fine and does not make trouble.
In serveradmin in the replik-tree window I recognized, that there are three IPs listet (10.0.11.6 (the correct OD-Master), 10.0.11.5 (just LOM of the server) and 10.0.11.7 (another xserve, which does only serve DHCP, DNS and Softwareupdates).
So I think, here is the reason for my trouble.
What do you think?
$ dscl /LDAPv3/127.0.0.1 read /Config/KerberosClient XMLPlist
offers following:
XMLPlist:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE plist PUBLIC "-//Apple//DTD PLIST 1.0//EN" "http://www.apple.com/DTDs/PropertyList-1.0.dtd">
<plist version="1.0">
<dict>
<key>edu.mit.kerberos</key>
<dict>
<key>domain_realm</key>
<dict>
<key>.local</key>
<string>XSERVER.LOCAL</string>
<key>local</key>
<string>XSERVER.LOCAL</string>
</dict>
<key>libdefaults</key>
<dict>
<key>default_realm</key>
<string>XSERVER.LOCAL</string>
</dict>
<key>realms</key>
<dict>
<key>XSERVER.LOCAL</key>
<dict>
<key>KADM_List</key>
<array>
<string>xserver.local</string>
<string>10.0.11.6</string>
<string>10.0.11.7</string>
<string>10.0.11.5</string>
</array>
<key>KDC_List</key>
<array>
<string>xserver.local</string>
<string>10.0.11.6</string>
<string>10.0.11.7</string>
<string>10.0.11.5</string>
</array>
</dict>
</dict>
</dict>
<key>generationID</key>
<integer>1320874315</integer>
</dict>
</plist>
$ dscl /LDAPv3/127.0.0.1 read /Config/passwordserver PasswordServerList
offers the same three IPs in the plist.
Should I edit the plist(s)?
If yes: How can I do this?
What else could I do?
Thank you for your assistance,
Peter.

Peter
You're welcome!
Running the "changeip" command is not necessarily a guarantee of anything - especially when it comes to LDAP Services. When doing the initial Promotion to OD Master you should have noticed this disparity? At that point you should have stopped and double-checked everything again. The "scutil" command in conjunction with a properly configured DNS Service is particularly useful in getting things back on track quickly and efficiently.
It's possible this disparity happened because you used the Server Setup Assistant after the initial Server Install? Unfortunately - if you did - that was your first mistake. Never use the Server Setup Assistant to configure anything other than defining the Server's default administrator account details, its network address and its hostname. As for its hostname you have to decide right at the beginning before doing anything else what this is going to be and you have to try and stick to it. Changing your mind afterwards can potentially break things in a major way.
If there are no existing DNS servers on your private network you will have to configure the DNS Service on the Server itself (as well as getting the Server fully up to date) before doing anything else. If there is an existing DNS Service create the appropriate records there.
I don't think the advice in the support document will actually help? Although you could try it if you wish. You might get more mileage from using the "changeip" command? This might bring things back on track and 're-align' the Kerberos Realm to the Server's true hostname? However depending on how mature and extensive your LDAP Database is it may make things actually worse. Even if it worked it may not necessarily help with other services you may or may not be using that depend on LDAP Services. Services such as iCal etc may end up not working at all or being problematic afterwards.
Ultimately you may be looking at Demotion and Re-promotion? with everything that that means. You have to make sure you prepare the ground properly first. Demotion blows everything to do with your LDAP Database away - users, passwords etc but not home folders.
For your future reference this is not the appropriate forum to post your question. The 10.5 Server Open Directory Forum is here:
http://discussions.apple.com/forum.jspa?forumID=1239
The OSX Server Forum as a whole is here:
http://discussions.apple.com/category.jspa?categoryID=96
Tony

Mail need long time to deliver inbound Message

Hi,
i send from my external Client (other Domain) an Testmail to my Account on my OS X Server, and in CC to my iCloud Address. The Mail delivers in iCloud direct, but on my OS X Server Account it needs up to 30-60 Minutes.
My OS X Server is direct connected (105 Mbit down/5 MBit upload) - no traffic on Line, DNS has only my OS X Server as MX Entry (no backup or so on), Mails deliviered direct via NAT-Forwarder. Before i used OS X Server i used MS Exchange Server, in this Scenario the Mails delivered too direct.
What ist the problem, works something like greylisting - so that the first connection is not accepted and only the next connection will work?

It turns out that within OS X Server (mountain lion, 10.8) the solution is a lot simpler and my previous one did not stick... Executing one line of code is sufficient,:
sudo serveradmin settings mail:postfix:greylist_disable = yes
Hope this helps.
Run this line of code on the receiving mail server.

Firefox need long time for start, downloads everytime at starting, reset useles, safe mode works

when starting the firefox.exe or the link, firefox need way too long till opening the window, everytime it starts it starts and cancel a download in download manager,
in safe mode it starts normal, with addons disabled it starts normal, disable the addons else do not work reset dont work either

You said that there was no problem in safe mode? Try this; disable
'''ALL of your add-ons''' and '''ALL your plug-ins'''. See if there is a problem.
If not, pick a few (two or three) items to enable. Keep going like this
until you have the problem again.

Mac Mini very slow at 4 gig memory, upgrade to 16 still slows down but takes a longer time

I bought a Mac mini a year ago. With an i7 and i terabyte and it cam with only 4 gig of ram. It worked fine for a while and i installed some apps then it started to get very slow. seeing the colorful "hourglass " turn round and round quite a few times. Then i went to the activity monitor where it told me that the memory used was about 3.89 gigs. I purchased a memory cleaner app from thr app store which helped a bit.
Today i upgraded to 16 gig memory and bang my computer ripped. The activity manager said i was using 6 gigs of ram and had 9.8 remaining.
after being on the internet for a couple of hours and using Firefox with about ten tabs open the computer started to get very slow again.
I checked the activity manager and it read 6 gigs used and the cash read a whopping 9 gigs. Did not think i would need the memory cleaner any more but after doing a clean it worked better.
Why did i get a whopping 9 gigs in the cash ? which is what it read after my computer slowed down again.

You may want to post in the Mac Mini forum, this is the iMac forum. If you would like me to I will ask the moderator to move the thread.

Wifi is connected to internet but takes a long time to work?

When i open my computer and connect to any kind of wifi it does it fine. But when i go to safari or firefox it claims it has no connection. I test the connect through network diagnostics and its all working just fine. Still no internet. After a couple of minutes pass and restarting the programs multiple times it works great no issues. But once i put it to sleep or connect to a new wifi same thing.It was working fine up until i did a recent firmware update? Wondering if thats the problem.... Its a brand new macbook running lion.. Any help would be great! Kinda irretating to wait for your internet for awhile.

I am also having the same exact issue. I thought my MBP was having issues and was about to bring it to Geeksquad to have them check it out. It takes me a full 2 minutes to connect. Its also having issues waking up from sleep (takes longer than before) and when the screen dims, it takes much longer to get bright once I interect with the MBP.
In the words of Liz Lemon. Blerg...

IE needs longer to load using Dynadock V10 on Satellite Pro M70

Hi,
when I'm using the Dynadock V10 on the Sattelite Pro M70 every time when a program has pictures in it, the need long time to load, and for this time the mouse curser is jumping. It appears in MS Internet Explorer as well as in MS Word.
Is there maybe a bottleneck with all those different data coming throw one simple USB cable?
When I don't use the Dynadock, connecting all the different cables directly with the Sattelite Pro the error doesn't happen!
Grafik driver is on the newest realease and the Operating System Windows XP has SP3 and newest Updates!
I tried to deinstall the Dynadoc Software, but the problem still occures.
How can I fix the problem, because now working is so bad, that the Dynadoc doesn't make sense!
Thanks in Advance!

I dont think anyone here will be able to offer some logic explanation and I think you must search best combination how to connect all devices together to have best performance.
We can ask here so many stuff but if this will help.... I dont think so.
What Im interesting here is follow: have you tried to change devices connectivity to get best performance? For instance I would never connect LAN to the Dynadock.
Why to send signal to external device and not directly to the notebook?

Photo editor window takes a long time to load

when i try to open a JPEG photo in photo editor in safari 2.0.4 with Java 1.4.2.
During the first try, the photo editor didnt load. Just the blank window got displayed.
After a system restart, the photo editor displays the Java screen, but takes a long time to load(more than an hour and it is still loading) and while it is loading, user is unable to use safari browser
Mac OS X (10.4.7) Java 1.3.1 and Java 1.4.2 is installed in the Mac OS X machine.

Hi arunarun,
What site are you visiting for the photo editor?

Process chain taking long time to complete

Hi,
I am having following issues in the process chain daily loads
1) The PSA deletion is taking very long time on fridays only (nearly 3 hrs). Other days it gets deleted in 1 hr max.
2) Just to load 381 records via dtp from DSO to cube takes nearly 2 hrs(Delta load). No major routines are written in the transformation.
How to analyse a process in process chain which does not fail, but takes very long time to complete. Is there any tool or transaction in BW which can help us to analyse why the process chain takes so long time to complete in different days. One day it completes in 8 hrs, another day it takes 12 hrs.
None of the transactions, SM37, SM50, SLG1, LOGS etc are giving me any help to analyse this issue.
If it fails we have error logs to check and analyse, but without failing how we can analyse and fix the delay and reduce the time of loading data. Please guide me.
Thanks in advance.
Vishwanath

Hi.......
1) This might be due to the poor performance of the system ..there wont be enoughwork processes avilabe in teh system .- What needs to be done if it does not have enough work processes available. Though I can find that lots of dialog processes were free during these jobs as well some Background processes were also free.?
Look to increase Work Process.......................u can do two things..............U can cancel some Job...........which r not progressing...........or which r not very important for the time being..........
Or if possible........u can increase number of servers..........
Look When a Job will start...............first it will run in background.............u can start in in Dialog also..........but for Dialogue after some time ..load will go to time out.................now many Child jobs will be created for a single background jobs..............they may run in Dialogue..........u can monitor them through SM66............
2) Check ST04 for lock waits and dead locks ..if the same lock persist for long then check with basis team.
What needs to be conveyed to the basis team when these locks happen?
generally these will be temporary Locks.............after some time locks will be realeased..............if they persist for a long time...........then u can contact Basis people..........Or if u can understand that which job is creating the lock.............like if u double click on the job >> click on Job details...............from there u will find the PID................copy that.............and check in ST04..........whether they matches or not..............now suppose it match.............and u know that job is not very important............then u can cancel the job.............
Check also the table space availba in St04 . the usuage should nt be more than 90%
What needs to be conveyed to the basis team if the usage is more than 90%.?
U can ask them to increase the Table space........
Check the sm37 >> delay column it should nt be high
What needs to be done if delay column is high. Actually it is high for these jobs (PSA deletion and load from DSO to Cube visa DTP (Delta load)?
If Delay is more.............it means ...........that there is no free work process...jobs r going to Release state............solution I had already given u.......
Check the PID refeclting in lock waits in sm66 wether they are progressing or nt ..
If they are not progressing what action needs to be taken?
Actually...........suppose one Dialogue job is running............it may change..........ie that Dialogue job will go to Stop status.........some other job will start............anyways if it does'nt progress............u can cacel the JOb.........
Check OS07 for DB if the idle time is less then 20% then its a problem ..
If the Idle time is less than 20% what action needs to be taken?
U can contact the Basis people.......
Check sm21 and RFC connection with other source systems in sm59 ..
What needs to be checked in SM21 and SM59 specifically? What parameter i need to check?
In SM21.............if red status is there............check the Log beside that..............may be it will be some Terminal disconnected.......
In SM59...........clck on test connection..........
if the problem is occuring due to only one source system then check the performance of that system ..
How to check the performance of these systems? Any tools available in R/3 system to check its performance?
No.....in this way u can check performance for all the source system...........go to SM59............double click on the desired source system>> click on test connection......
If All these are persisting then its a performance problem and check with basis team ..
Is there any special settings which needs to be maintained to achieve better performance of Process chain loads?
U can Improve the performance of process chain by Parallel Processing..........ie split the loads by giving selections...........and execute thenm in parallel..........
Regards,
Debjani........

Interactive Report general Search is taking long time

Hi All,
I have two IR reports in my Application, Both are using same tables , same where clause, displaying column is different.
Both query returning 60000 records, In my first report , after my report gets loaded , i am using the general search button for getting some data,
when i try to find 100 in my reports , my first report displaying the search result in 5 seconds, But my second report i am doing the same steps , but its taking long time to respond.
Could some one tell me what is the cause for this problem also in what basis this search will work means how this will work?
Cheers,
San

Hi Mike,
You are right test is the View
After i enabled the debug i found the below query
Report 1 Query
SELECT "Checkbox",
"RS_TRX_NUMBER",
"EXT_TRX_NUMBER",
"ARRANGEMENT_NUMBER",
"TRX_DATE",
"TRX_STATUS",
"SOLD_TO_CUSTOMER_NAME",
"TRX_TYPE",
"CURRENCY",
"COMMITTED_AMOUNT",
"BUDGET_AMOUNT",
"TRANSACTION_BUDGET",
"TRX_DESCRIPTION",
"FILES",
"Lines",
"Events",
"TRX_Revenue",
"ARGMT_Revenue",
"Holds",
"RS_TRX_ID",
COUNT(DISTINCT "ARRANGEMENT_NUMBER") over (),
COUNT(*) over () AS apxws_row_cnt
FROM
(SELECT *
FROM
    (SELECT a.* ,
      'Events' "Events" ,
      'Billing' "Billing" ,
      'Transaction Revenue' "TRX_Revenue" ,
      'Arrangement Revenue' "ARGMT_Revenue" ,
      'Lines' "Lines" ,
      'Invoice' "Invoice" ,
      'Holds' "Holds" ,
      apex_item.hidden ( 2, a.rs_trx_number)
      || apex_item.checkbox ( 1, a.rs_trx_id, 'onchange="spCheckChange(this, ''x01'', ''P13_TRX_AJAX_NAME'', ''P13_TRX_COLLECTION_NAME'',''SELECTED_TRX'');"', c.n001, ':' ) "Checkbox"
    FROM test a,
      apex_collections c
    WHERE a.rs_trx_id        = c.n001(+)
    AND c.collection_name(+) = :P13_TRX_COLLECTION_NAME
    AND a.org_id            IN
      (SELECT DISTINCT org_id
      FROM test1
      WHERE (role_name = :APPUSER_CURRENT_ROLE)
    ) r
) r
where rownum <= TO_NUMBER(:APXWS_MAX_ROW_CNT)
Second Report
SELECT "Checkbox",
"EXT_TRX_NUMBER",
"RS_TRX_NUMBER",
"ARRANGEMENT_NUMBER",
"TRX_RM_STATUS",
"SOLD_TO_CUSTOMER_NAME",
"TRX_TYPE",
"TRX_DESCRIPTION",
"CURRENCY",
"COMMITTED_AMOUNT",
"UNEARNED",
"EARNED",
"REV_TRANSFERRED",
"REV_LINES",
"SCHEDULES",
"EVENTS",
"EXT_TRX_ID",
"PRIMARY_SALESREP_NUMBER",
"RS_TRX_ID",
COUNT(*) over () AS apxws_row_cnt
FROM
(SELECT *
FROM
    (SELECT a.* ,
      'Rev Lines' REV_LINES ,
      'Schedules' Schedules ,
      'Events' Events ,
      apex_item.hidden ( 2, a.rs_trx_number)
      || apex_item.checkbox ( 1, a.rs_trx_id, 'onchange="spCheckChange(this, ''x01'', ''P5_REV_TRX_AJAX_NAME'', ''P5_RTCN'',''SELECTED_REV_TRX'');"', c.n001, ':' ) "Checkbox"
    FROM Test a,
      apex_collections c
    WHERE a.rs_trx_id        = c.n001(+)
    AND C.COLLECTION_NAME(+) = :P5_RTCN
    AND a.org_id            IN
      (SELECT DISTINCT org_id
      FROM Test1
      WHERE (role_name = :APPUSER_CURRENT_ROLE)
    ) r
) r
WHERE rownum <= to_number(:APXWS_MAX_ROW_CNT)
ORDER BY "ARRANGEMENT_NUMBER" DESC,
"EXT_TRX_NUMBER"
In Source i am using the same query in both report , But how come order by clause has been adding in my Second query.
Also in Report 1 :
COUNT(DISTINCT "ARRANGEMENT_NUMBER") over (),
COUNT(*) over () AS apxws_row_cnt
The same is not there in Second report query .
How can i remove that order by clause from my id also how can i resolve the above change (
COUNT(DISTINCT "ARRANGEMENT_NUMBER") over (),
COUNT(*) over () AS apxws_row_cnt)
Help me out to resolve.
Cheers,
San

Installation of ECC6 on AIX/ DB2 taking long time

Hi,
I am installing SAP ECC 6 on a heavy power server with AIX 5.3 with DB2 9 and amd all the other setting is perfect with correct JDK version. The first 24 step on installation went fine in 20 min and its been more than 16 hrs where installation is on ABAP import step. The installation is running fine with out any error but its takeing long time
does it take long time on AIX with DB2?
Cheers
Arun

Hi,
The space fine here. installation directory is 94% free. and Log also same. Let me know wht is the minimum to maximum time for the installation
Cheers
Arun

Edge composition loads perfectly, but it needs long time to load. Why?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for