EDI DESADV

Hi all,
I have an SHPMNT05 IDOC in SAP with custom segments. In the custom segment, I need to add a new field. With this change, the EDI DESADV is also affected. May I know the steps on how to proceed on this? I think further coordination with the EDI subsystem (middleware) and receiver is required.
What is the feasible estimate per activities on this?
Thanks!
Edited by: Vijay Babu Dudla on Apr 27, 2009 9:59 AM

Hi,
The below mentioned steps need to be done:-
You need to make necessary changes to the existing IDOC type, by creating a new segment for the new field or add the new field in any of the existing custom segment.
Make changes to the existing program to populate the new field.
If you are creating a new extension type, then you need to make changes in the WE82 transaction for that message type
Change the corresponding partner profile as it is a outbound interface.
The below mentioned changes has to be done in your EDI sub system:-
The source idoc structure has to be enhanced, and check whether the new field which you have added in SAP is already available in the EDI message or not. We can also use any of the dummy field in the EDI message for this purpose.
If the EDI team and partner have decided to add a new segment then it will include lot of work in the EDI sub-system on your side and as well on the partner side.
If the EDI team and the partner has decided to put this new SAP field into a existing field of the EDI message then its going to be a minor changes on both sides.
Please let me know if you have any further queries.
Thanks,
Mahesh.

Similar Messages

GI (Good Issue ) date in EDI DESADV

Hi Friends,
I want to map the GI (Good Issue ) date in EDI EDIFACT DESADV . Can you please tell me the which qualifier in DTM segment i have to map this?
Regards
Venkatesh

Hi ,
May be this info could help you .
Iam working on same requirement but using DESADV.DELVRY03 (IDOC) -> FILE.
Good 's issue details:
Segment: E1EDT13 .
This has the field called qualifier (QUALF = 006) -- 006 for : '006' = Goods Issue
Another Field : NTANF - Goods Issue Date
Hope this helps:)

Inbound Delivery: Inbound WHSCON IDoc with Batch Split - HowTo...?

Hello
We have another tricky problem to solve on our ERP 6.0 system.
My colleagues of Lindt UK create manually inbound deliveries (VL33N) which are replicated to the warehouse (DESADV IDoc -> TRADACOMS.ORDHDR).
When the goods arrive at the warehouse they send back a good receipts message (TRADACOMS.DLCHDR -> WHSCON IDoc).
In some cases we have a batch split because the goods have been put into different storage locations. Example:
- item 10: 200 Cases of product 4711, batch 10-2011, in storage location '0001' (free available for Sale)
- item 10:     5 Cases of product 4711, batch 10-2011, in storage location '0004' (damaged)
I am aware that in the inbound WHSCON item 10 is a main position and the two actual batch split positions are sub-items (900001 & 900002 with HIPOS = '10'). I tried to used E1EDL19-QUALF = 'BAS' (= batch split) with the sub-items but failed so far to update the inbound delivery that I can see the batch split.
I have managed to get one sub-item but not 2 of them. Somehow the system aggregates the quantities for both sub-items into the single item that shows up in the inbound delivery.
When we send the inbound delivery to the warehouse the item looks like this:
- item 10: 200 Cases (no batch yet, Putaway quantity = 0, because these data are coming from the warehouse).
QUESTION: Has anybody else been faced with a similar (if not identical) problem and how did you solve it?
Thanks a lot in advance for your valuable input.
Regards
Uwe

Hello Finbarr
I assume that you do NOT send any (suggested) batches to your warehouse. Otherwise you would have the same problem like we have that the WHSCON cannot overwrite a (suggested) batch.
However, if you just send the quantity per item then the batch split is much simpler than you suggested:
"First E1EDL24 segment:
POSNR     50
MATNR     000000000000602006
MATWA     000000000000602006
CHARG     L1519   " <<< first batch
LFIMG     37.000
VRKME     CT
"Second E1EDL24 segment:
POSNR     50
MATNR     000000000000602006
MATWA     000000000000602006
CHARG     L1880   " <<< second batch
LFIMG     37.000
VRKME     CT
Well, and as qualifier we use: E1EDL19-QUALF = 'XYZ' " a dummy
The SAP system is smart enough the realize that these two E1EDL24 segment belong to the same item yet have different batches and, therefore, yield a batch split in the delivery. The system generated the 9xxxxx numbers for this sub-item lines automatically.
Although I believe that it is not possible to change a batch in the delivery using an inbound WHSCON I would appreciate to have a final proof of this assumption. I could imagine that if you first delete the item containing the suggested batch and then add a new item with the actual batch from the warehouse it might works. However, this would require to implement a user-exit which I do not prefer.
Regards
Uwe
PS: It seems I gave an answer to the wrong question (should be EDI (DESADV): Can batches be overwritten by an inbound WHSCON (pick conf)? )

Inbound Delivery Idoc with batch split then PIC and PGI using DELIVERY03

Dear Experts,
Requirement to split the delivery item then PIC and PGI, while Processing Inbound Idoc using basic Idoc type DELIVERY03
I have searched forum already but it vain. Please advice.
Thanks and Regards,
Thiru.
Moderator message : Spec/requirements dumping not allowed, show the work you have already done. Thread locked.
Edited by: Vinod Kumar on Nov 16, 2011 5:09 PM

Hello Finbarr
I assume that you do NOT send any (suggested) batches to your warehouse. Otherwise you would have the same problem like we have that the WHSCON cannot overwrite a (suggested) batch.
However, if you just send the quantity per item then the batch split is much simpler than you suggested:
"First E1EDL24 segment:
POSNR     50
MATNR     000000000000602006
MATWA     000000000000602006
CHARG     L1519   " <<< first batch
LFIMG     37.000
VRKME     CT
"Second E1EDL24 segment:
POSNR     50
MATNR     000000000000602006
MATWA     000000000000602006
CHARG     L1880   " <<< second batch
LFIMG     37.000
VRKME     CT
Well, and as qualifier we use: E1EDL19-QUALF = 'XYZ' " a dummy
The SAP system is smart enough the realize that these two E1EDL24 segment belong to the same item yet have different batches and, therefore, yield a batch split in the delivery. The system generated the 9xxxxx numbers for this sub-item lines automatically.
Although I believe that it is not possible to change a batch in the delivery using an inbound WHSCON I would appreciate to have a final proof of this assumption. I could imagine that if you first delete the item containing the suggested batch and then add a new item with the actual batch from the warehouse it might works. However, this would require to implement a user-exit which I do not prefer.
Regards
Uwe
PS: It seems I gave an answer to the wrong question (should be EDI (DESADV): Can batches be overwritten by an inbound WHSCON (pick conf)? )

Automatic packaging with cover

Hallo,
would you be so kind and answer my question:
-I would like to make packaging of materials into boxes(f.e. 6) makes packaging instruction 1),
-boxes(packaging instruction 1) on the pallet makes packaging instruction 2)
-and I have a cover of the box as a separate material which I put on the (6) boxes which makes packaging instruction 3 AND NO sense because man cannot pack palet into cover or opposite.
So I have:
boxes with material on one pallet and it is cover by one cover.
How to make aut. pakaging and additionaly the EDI DESADV should be correct
Many thanks for help in advance yet!!!!!!!
Regards
Marceli

Hi,
The automatic packing proposal provides you with the option of proposing shipping units for the items to be packed. The proposal covers both the shipping material as well as the contents for each shipping unit.
To configure the automatic packing in shiping , please go through following Link
[Automatic Packing in Shipping |http://help.sap.com/saphelp_45b/helpdata/en/ac/f6fe7b931a11d184d10000e81ddea0/content.htm]
The definition of the packing proposal covers several user exits. You can process the user exits using the transaction Project Management of SAP Exits. This is an SAP user exit with the name PACKMODI.
Regards...
imran

EDI / Idoc DESADV Inbound Delivery

Hello,
we send IDocs (DELVRY03,DESADV) as shipping notifications to another R/3 system. The inbound deliveries in the receiving system, generated automatically, are also containing the handling units as delivery positions, which are specified in the IDOC.
How can we prevent this, so that only the actual delivery positions are listed in the inbound delivery? Customizing?
Thanks you in advance.

Hello Mario,
I assume that you have plant and item category filled in your HUs. In this case a delivery item is generated although the corresponding flag at the item category is switched off (this is the 'old' logic of item generation).
Therefore if you want to prevent the item generation you could prevent the determination of an item category (see trx. 0184, entries for EL, PACK).
If you need a more detailed control of the item generation e.g. only for some special packing materials, you might also use the 'ItemRequirement' at the delivery type (in standard 202), which specifies if an item without reference can be added to an delivery (can be maintained by using transaction VOFM - Copy requirements - Delivery).
Best regards,
Ulrich

EDI Inbound delivery DESADV delvry03

I'm waiting on a translator for the mapping the above to create inbound deliveries but while I wait I'd like to set up a few scenarios on our system. Does anyone have a mapping documnet I could have a look at? If so could you send it to the e-mail address below.
Thanks for your help, Mark
[email protected]

Hai Mark,
Check this mapping template for delvry03 ...
<b>http://www.sapgenie.com/sapgenie/docs/o856v4010_template.xls</b>
Hope it will surely help u...
Regards,
Sridhar

EDI:Sale order and delivery order

hi friends
1.Our process is customer send the PO Through B2B Server (third party system)
my how i get the notification throgh mail..what i do for configuration.....iam sure this is for inbound message ..is it require EDI Configuration or master data
2. Parner profile WE20
MESSAGE CONTROL
MESSAGE TYPE--RD04 What is the purpose maintain there
PROCESS CODE -SD09 What is the purpose maintain there
3..During delivery document
Partner profile shall i maitain out boud parameter is DESADV For Partner function SP, INVOIC For Partner function BP, DESADVI For Partner function SH.
Isit right way? any thing missing pls suggest me to maintain the data
wiht regards
dinesh

You are right. If your customer is sending you a purchase order, then it can come thro' EDI.
For this, you should have your customer in WE20 with inbound. Partner is KU. It is standard. You can go to WE60/61 to see the documentation on the same. If you have the connections properly done (which Basis has to help you with), you should be able to get the sales order into the system.
For delivery, desadv is correct. However, WE20 should have to be configured on SH.
RD04 is usually used for intercompany invoice posting to MM within SAP. You need not have to use it. You can use a diffient out put type configured to EDI output. INVOIC01 is the one used to send the customer invoices out of SAP.
Invoices are usually configured on BP or PY. Usually BP and PY are same in most of the scenarios.

Update "Delivery Completed" Indicator in PO Item via EDI

Hello
We have another challenging task regarding purchase order confirmations that we would like to tackle (SAP Release is ERP 6.0).
The 2 partner in our scenario are distribution companies (= DC) which order goods and production companies (= PC) which deliver the goods:
(1) DC sends purchase oder via EDI (ORDERS IDoc)
    -> creates sales order in ERP of PC
(2) PC splits sales order into multiple deliveries.
   Each delivery is sent as outbound DESADV
   -> creates inbound delivery in ERP of DC.
(3) At some point the PC has completed the sales order
   yet it is possible that less was delivered than was ordered
      (i.e. we can have under-deliveries).
Now the question is:
How can the PC transmit the final information "SalesOrder completed" implying that the "Delivery Completed" indicator in the PO items should be updated (= 'X')?
My assumption is that we need to look at the sales order (ERP of PC) because this is the document which "collects" the information from all the split deliveries.
Any help related to understanding how the (standard) business process would look like and how to translate this into a technical solution (EDI / IDoc) is more than welcome.
Regards
Uwe

Hello Uwe,
As you mentioned, I tried to check with the Workflow solution by tracking the events through Business Object BUS2032 (Order) or LIKP (Outbound Delivery) but failed to get successful results.
Problem with BUS2032, event CHANGED is that it doesn't get triggered when the Header/Item level status changed during delivery Processing.
While using BO- LIKP (Outbound Delivery Processing), Events - Changed,Created, I am successful in triggering the event, but the problem with BO-LIKP is that, it does not have the item level details in the ATTRIBUTES list. To get the balance quantity available for order line item (mentioned in my earlier reply)Item details are necessary to findout the Reference Sales Order & Line item. With this, the Option of Triggering of Workflow using LIKP didn't give the required result.

Inbound delivery creation in STO via EDI/Idoc

Hello experts,
My requirement is like this:-
Stock transfer order is created for supplying plant 2000 & receiving plant 2010.
When the supplying plant 2000 posts an outbound delivery & PGI, at same time an Inbound delivery should be created in receiving plant 2010.
I know theoretically that this is achieved by making confirmation settings & output types. But don't know exactly how to configure it.
Can you please mention the process?
I have referred the scn threads:
Outbound Delivery to Inbound delivery by using IDOC
how to configure the message control for DESADV
SAP note 111903
Receiving Vendor Confirmations via EDI - Purchasing (MM-PUR) - SAP Library
But there is lack of clarity from my side.

You do not need to use EDI messages to get an inbound delivery created when a PGI is done on the outbound delivery.
Search for the config on the SPED output type. This SPED output message can be triggered during the PGI which results in the creation of an inbound delivery in the receiving plant.
The receiving plant will have to maintain the confirmation control key 0004 at item level in the purchasing document.
Link to SAP help Automatic Creation of Inbound Delivery - Transfer and Inventory Management - SAP Library
Refer SAP note 1119073 point 3 and note 965176
Regards,

Creation of Inbound Deliveries via DESADV using EAN's

Hi all,
I've tried to get an answer/feedback on this in the SCM Logistics Execution, but didn't get a bite, so I'm trying this forum as the type of question seems more aligned to the content in it...
I am trying to simulate an inbound delivery creation process using DELVRY06/DESADV for a PO. The issue I have is that the EDI provider will not be sending the material number in either the E1EDL24 (delivery line item) or E1EDL44 (HU item) segments - only the barcode (which causes a second issue).
E1EDL24 has a field EAN11 which I have populated with the relevant EAN/UPC code and removed the MATNR and KDMAT values for the R/3 material. However I cannot get the inbound delivery to create without populating the material number.
Also for the HU, we have the scenario of having multiple materials (E1EDL44) packed into a HU (E1EDL37). The DL44 segment only has material fields and no corresponding EAN field to identify the materials to be packed.
If anyone has experience with this issue then I would love to hear what I can do. If there is something that is 'out of the box' i.e. SAP standard then that will be first prize for sure, but if I have to, then an enhancement may be required - hopefully not.
Kind regards and many thanks,
Paul...

Hi Alex - I was hoping you wouldn't say that! It just seems a bit odd that an EAN being a universal product identifier isn't utilised within the inbound delivery process as they are supposed to unique.
Thanks for the input. Much appreciated...

Idoc DELVRY03/DESADV for Inbound delivery with serial number

Hi,
We have set up am EDI process between our vendors ERP system and our SAP. We will send purchase order Idocs to our vendor, once our vendor has shipped the goods (to our customer) he send an DESADV/DELVRY03 Idoc back to our system. This Idoc will create a statistical inbound delivery and a statistical goods receipt will be automatically created in our SAP system.
This process runs fine as long as we use materials without serial numbers. Unfortunately we have some materials which need to have a serial number assigned by our vendor and we want to keep track of this information in our SAP system.
The only place where I found a serial number field in the Idoc is in the 'E1EDL46 : Serial Numbers HU' segment in the DELVRY03 Idoc, but unfortunately we don't have handling units activated in our SAP system. So if we fill this information the Idoc processing fails.
Is there any other way to create an inbound delivery containing serial number information without activating handling units?
Thanks for your help,
Frank

Hi,
is there anyone who has experience with EDI inbound delivery postings containing serial number information?
Thank you,
Frank

Mapping IDoc-2-EDI

Hi,
i am trying to configure a mapping from DELVRY03(DESADV) to AVIEXP (Odette).
I just want to ask some of the experts, if there are any templates for this mapping.
Or is there some misunderstanding in my point of view because i was also thinking to use the Conversion Agent to do this mapping!?
Can someone help?!
best regards, Jens

hi,
>>>Or is there some misunderstanding in my point of view because i was also thinking to use the Conversion Agent to do this mapping!?
use need to use some conversion tool:
you can check if Conversion Agent has your EDI standard inside
(you can download it and check youself for free)
Regards,
michal
<a href="/people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/06/28/xipi-faq-frequently-asked-questions"><b>XI / PI FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions</b></a>

EDI using seeburger

Hi Friends,
Recently I have worked on EDI scenarios using Seeburger adapter.
there are so many in and outs for EDI / Seeburger ,
out of that I need some inputs on finalization of error handling framework for EDI implementation using Seeburger.
Please give your thoughts on error handling in EDI /Seeburger.

Beside my two cents above, your question can't really be answered without defining some business rules around it. So for the sake of discussion i am going to make up a scenario. And the cycle upto Despatch advice.
So business rules are:
1) Over supply not do able. Which implicitly means no manual changes in the incoming ORDER.
2) Under supply allowed as in the real world this will always happen as at the time of ORDER, the supplier side could be out of stock on a particular item ordered.
Message Cycle:
1) Order (Inbound)
2) Order confirmation (Outbound)
3) Dispatch advice (outbound) - DESADV
So briefly speaking based on how the Order confirmation is setup (based on business guidelines) will determine what we are suppose to handle.
If order confirmation is allowed to change the Order i.e. If no stock available and hence line item rejected it would update the original Order in the sending partners system hence no issues at the time of desadv (this is situation one). However if due to some human error more stock shipped than agreed upon in the DESADV then 'excess stock' process can be invoked and based on business rule it can be returned e.g.. This wouldn't require any message amendment. However if short delivered then what was agreed in DESADV partner can always request amends and new DESADV (corrected) can be issued.
I will stop here; I am hoping that i am making sense above? Will continue if i am making sense and then we can talk about technical side for addressing different situations.
regards,

Seeburger EDI conversion Vs XI Conversion Agent EDI conversion?

We have implemented Seeburger's EDI solution at a client, and our another client wants to an EDI solution for them.
I cam across this weblog, and it is very interesting. I have some questions.
1. Does Converstion Agent support the converstion of all versions of native EDI X12 and EDIFACT to the corresponding XML verions, and vice versa.
2. What are the differences between Seeburger's and XI Conversion Agent's EDI soultions?
Your feedback would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks a lot.
Karma

Hi Karma,
SAP Conversion Agent by Itemfield is a data conversion system that enables you to create interfaces between any data formats and XML-based systems. The Conversion Agent can convert unstructured, semi-structured, and structured formats to XML, and the other way around.
Have a look at these links:
/people/william.li/blog/2006/03/17/how-to-get-started-using-conversion-agent-from-itemfield
/people/paul.medaille/blog/2005/11/17/more-on-the-sap-conversion-agent-by-itemfield
http://www.stylusstudio.com/edi/XML_to_X12.html
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/b0b355ae-0501-0010-3b83-8f2bb566fa47
Seeburger EDI Adapter provides an EDI solution on internet via HTTP or AS2 to replace the expensive VAN. It provides some pre-built mappings for IDOC to ANSI X12(810,850,855,856 etc.,) and Idoc to EDIFACT(ORDERS,DESADV,INVOIC etc.,) and has the ability to build your own. These pre-defined mappings transform the IDOC-XML to EDI-XML format.
These transformed EDI-XML messages are then converted to EDI specific format using the Seeburger's BIC(Business Integration Converter)adapter. In addition, Seeburger provides adapters like AS2,FTP(EDI specific) and so on to route these EDI messages to external EDI Partners.
For more i would suggest you to go through these links:
http://www.seeburger.it/fileadmin/it/pdf/2005_04_sapphire_Ferrero_transcript.pdf
http://www.seeburger.com/fileadmin/com/pdf/Butler_Group_SEEBURGER_Technology_Audit.pdf
http://www.seeburger.com/fileadmin/com/pdf/AS2_General_Overview.pdf
Seeburger EDI Adapter leverages SAP XI's Adapter Framework. This Adapter is used to perform conversion between EDI and XML format. It also provides some canned EDI layouts and the ability to build your own. It is used to transfer the EDI message via HTTP or AS2 protocols.
The most direct way of using the Seeburger adapters is to configure the BIC as a module. There is a software component from seeburger called bicmapper which will allow you to do the following:
1. define or import the inbound message metadefinition in various formats ( edifact, xml,...)
2. using a mapping create an xml variant as the output metadefinition or edifact in the other direction.
3. create a one to one mapping between input en output.
4. export the metadata in xsd or sda format for import in XI.
5. generate an SDA which can be deployed in XI and used as a module.
Please go through the following links which clearly explains what you want and it also helps you in understanding the same in depth:
http://www.seeburger.com
http://www.seeburger.it/fileadmin/it/pdf/2005_04_sapphire_Ferrero_transcript.pdf
http://www.seeburger.com/fileadmin/com/pdf/Butler_Group_SEEBURGER_Technology_Audit.pdf
http://www.sap.com/france/company/events/2006/02-01-Automotive-Seeburger.pdf
http://h41123.www4.hp.com/presentations/ISUG/XISeeBurger.ppt
http://www.sap.com/asia/company/events/nwtechdays/presentation/australia-slides/Pre-Built_Integration.pdf
There are also a few ways to use EDI with the ALE system of R3.
inbound EDI to R3
1.use a 3rd party adapter for the EDI protocol(eg.SEEBURDER) from the EDI system,send the produced XML to the XI ,map the xml message to a matching IDoc using the IDoc adapter.
outbound ALE message from R3 to EDI system
1. Configure the ALE system to point to the XI the relevant IDoc (SM59,WE21,WE20...)
2.use a file adapter3rd party EDI adapter and map the fields to the target structure.
have a look at this example:
http://www.ean.se/EANCOM%202000/iftmin/example.htm
Details on how to configure can be found on SDN
I hope this helps....
Regards,
Abhy

EDI DESADV

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for