EEWB and EBT

I am working on a task to add custom fields to a standard SAP BP tab. I was going to use EEWB to update BUT000 and create the custom tab in BP, then use BDT to move the fields over to the SAP standard tab. I have never done this before, so here are my questions.
1. After I use EEWB to add the fields to the table/screen, will I need to add code to the BADI? Or, can I take care of the rest with BDT?
2. Is a combination of BDT and EEWB the best way to accomplish my goal?
3. If so, please clarify what part of this development do I use EEWV for, and what part do I use BDT for?
Thanks for your help. It is greatly appreciated!
Regards,
Jason

Hi Jason,
BDT is a framework and EEWB is a tool. The thingsw hich you can manually do with BDT can be automatically generated using EEWB. So, ultimately the changes done using either is same.
You can generated the custom field and related coding using EEWB and then use BUPT transaction to move your field to standard tab.
Smita.

Similar Messages

  • What is the main difference between eewb and aet tool ?

    Dear all,
    What is the main difference between eewb and aet? Both ways we can create fields and coming to aet is in crm 7.0 and eewb is in 6.0.when we are creating fields through eewb we should have technical knowledge but aet tool is a simple tool as a function people also can easily add the fields. I want to know is there any main difference between both these tools.
    Regards,
    Jemmi.

    EEWB works from SAP GUI whereas AET works from WEB UI. AET is developed on top of the EEWB. Most the Objects are supported barring a few through AET. It's a very usefull tool for SAP CRM.
    Since in CRM SAP GUI will be phased out soon, AET will be prominent. One will see lot more features in upcoming relase in AET tool.
    Regards,
    Harshit

  • Adding a new field in  EEWB and pulling this to IC 4.0

    Hi All
    i am trying to add a new field thro EEWB in CRM 40 and link to CRM IC . I have successsfully added the field and the same is now appearing in the IC webclient.
    Now  I need to passvalues Yes and No and the deafult shall be blank  in a drop down list box
    How to pass the values. Please forward the code to attach in BSP and where.
    Also I need to make this field as mandatory and  a error message should be visible in the IC
    I shall reward points
    SURYA

    Hello,
    I have looked at wiki below [http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/CRM/Howtoaddanexistingfieldtoasearchpageofadifferent+component]
    Kindly suggest ways to acheive adding new field in Opportunity Search ( employee responsible which is not the main contact like I mentioned ) which belongs to another component ...Can it be done without coding eg. adding to design layer.
    Can you please give steps to do the same.
    Thanks.
    Regards,
    Monica

  • EEWB and adding additional fields to the IBASE header

    Hello,
    I have used the EEWB (Easy Enhancement WorkBench) to add additional fields to the IBASE header. The process ends with a success state and in all steps there are no logs. The objects are generated and visible in the database table of the IBASE header and activated.
    When I go to the IB53 transaction the systems starts compiling. After the compiling there are no additional fields visible?
    In the EEWB no more actions are possible and it seems only an append structure was created with the new fields (GENERIC_IC_TASK).
    How do I get the fields to be visible in the IBASE transaction?
    I am using CRM 5.0.

    Ramakanth/Kiran,
    For creating screen structures or additional fields on the IBase header screen you would need to manually append entries in Database Tables T371D.... through T371Z, it is a set of around12-14 tables depending on the scenario which would need updations.
    Once updated in the right sequence you can see the EEWB fields on the Ibase header screen.
    Hope this helps.
    Amit Sitlani

  • Adding new field at leasing contract using EEWB and using it for pricing

    Using the Easy enhancement workbench, I have created a new tab containing a new field at the item level of contract. Then in SPRO, in the field catalog, I added a new entry using the same field name and data element name. Created a new condition table with this new field. created access sequence and assigned it to a condition type.
    I tried to maintain condition record for the condition type but initially it was showing some error for which I had to implement a new method for the BAdi /SAPCND/ROLLNAME.
    Now. condition record is also maintained successfully.
    But, the problem is that the value is not reflected at the contract.
    Somehow, the condition record is not being picked up.
    Please suggest some solution.
    Regards,
    Anindita RoyChowdhury.

    Hi Anindita,
    Stpes mentioned in your questions are fine.
    You have created new Screen @ item level in Order txn, right?
    Did u checked value passed to the method of BAdI ?
    As per my knowledge, pricing call must have happened before you fill the Zfield which u added in new screen. Hence no value in field and no effect on pricing.
    Regards,
    Deven

  • Adding new field using EEWB and using it for Pricing

    Using the Easy enhancement workbench, I have created a new tab containing a new field at the item level of contract. Then in SPRO, in the field catalog, I added a new entry using the same field name and data element name. Created a new condition table with this new field. created access sequence and assigned it to a condition type.
    I tried to maintain condition record for the condition type but initially it was showing some error for which I had to implement a new method for the BAdi /SAPCND/ROLLNAME.
    Now. condition record is also maintained successfully.
    But, the problem is that the value is not reflected at the contract.
    Somehow, the condition record is not being picked up.
    Please suggest some solution.
    Regards,
    Anindita RoyChowdhury.

    Hi Anindita,
    Stpes mentioned in your questions are fine.
    You have created new Screen @ item level in Order txn, right?
    Did u checked value passed to the method of BAdI ?
    As per my knowledge, pricing call must have happened before you fill the Zfield which u added in new screen. Hence no value in field and no effect on pricing.
    Regards,
    Deven

  • What is the use of AET? What are the differences between AET and EEWB?

    Hi,
    I would like to know about AET? What is the use of AET? What are the differences between AET and EEWB? Please help me out?
    Thanks,
    Satish

    Hi
    You can refer the following links for your question.
    Difference between AET and EEWB
    What is the use of AET? What are the differences between AET and EEWB?
    Difference between EEWB - UI Configuration Tool - AET
    http://senthilsapcrm.wordpress.com/2010/02/04/adding-custom-fields-in-sap-crm-7-0-using-aet/
    What is the main difference between eewb and aet tool ?
    Hope it is useful.
    Thanks and regards
    Preeti Viswanath

  • AET and EEWB

    Hi,
    I'm new to CRM. In CRM i came to know that EEWB and AET is used to add custom fields to web UI.  Who does this - the functional team or the technical team?
    Sujatha

    Hi there,
    Till CRM2007, EEWB was the only available tool to add custom fields to the Business Object.
    EEWB was more on technical side as it needed the knowledge of BOL and veruify the structures etc after the addition of fields and also to execute the dependable steps for further enhancements.However, till that point also Functional Consultants were used to use EEWB and in case of a difficulty, the technical consultants was supposed to help. the BO extension was not a specific technical consultant's work but more of Functional consultant's Job but due to the technical knowledge involved in EEWB, its often redirected to a Technical Consultant.
    Now, even after the field is added thought BO extension via EEWB, there were technical developments needed to make this newly added field available on UI ( Webclient/ BSP/ PCUI any sort of UI before CRM2007 web ui ) and this was definitely Technical consultant's Job.
    So before CRM2007, functionals often used EEWB and give the newly added field's details to technical along with details as where to make the field available and the technical guy used to do the screeen/UI programming to make field available to the users.
    With CRM2007, AET is introduced. The biggest advantage of AET is no need of technical knowledge . AET is run directly on the new WEB UI in configuration mode and you can add a new filed to the existing BOL just like a drag and drop through runing an AET wizard on the view in which you want the additional field that is not available in the present BOL.
    Thus, AET completely removed the functional consultant's dependency on technical guys to add a field by BO extension . So earlier, the same work that used to take 1 to 2 days now got reduced to merely half an hour job with AET.
    With CRM2007 and onwards, now functionals themselves add the fields to the UI view without any help of technical consultants. However its always recommended that a technical consultant should also be familiar with AET tool and its use.
    The only advantage of EEWB over AET is that fields added through EEWB are also available for SAP GUI enhancements( Custom Fields Tab on SAP GUI ), however fields added thought AET are available only on WEB UI. You can not have them on SAP GUI screens. I will not see it as a drawback but this is merely due to the fact that SAP now recommends SAP GUI to be used only for administrative purpose and not more than that. WEB UI should be used for every thing else and thus now onwards AET will be dominant over EEWB.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Suchita

  • Mapping Z-fields of BP in CRM to ECC and vice versa

    Hi Gurus,
    Z-fields for BP were created in CRM using EEWB and AET tool. These z-fields need to be transferred from CRM to ECC, standard fields like KNB1-ALTKN, KNKK-REVDB,KNKA-KLIME... etc.
    Now, that these z-fields are added in the BDoc. I believe no enhancement is required on CRM.
    Please guide me on how to map these z-fields from CRM to standard feilds of ECC.
    Thanks & Regards
    Praveen
    Edited by: Praveen on Apr 19, 2010 10:19 AM

    Hi,
    Thats right! C03 best practices would be certainly helpful to you.
    Few important steps for BP repllication from CRM to ECC would be
    In CRM , First define your Logical destination in BD54 .
    1) SU01 Transaction to create users : create user in CRM & R/3
    2) Transaction code SM59 : Create RFC DESTINATION .. here u use the users created for reaching into R/3 from CRM
    3) transaction code: SMOEAC: ADMINISTRATION CONSOLE:-
    here define Publication, subscription and site ( OLTP) , and define replication objects ( like BUPA_MAIN, BUPA_REL)
    4) define Queue: SMQR and SMQS - inbound and outbound queue /
    Que registration .
    5) check entry in R/3 side tables:- Make the proper entry into R/3 side tables in SM30
    a)CRMRFCPAR
    b)CRMPAROLTP
    c)CRMSUBTAB
    d) CRMCONSUM
    These are important steps for Middleware settings between CRM & R/3
    In addition to this , you need to correctly define your
    1) in CRM ,BP GROUPINGS with Internal Number range
    2) in R/3 define "Account Group" with "External Number Range" for BUSINESS PARTNER
    3) In R/3 , Mapping of CRM CLASSIFICATION with R/3 account group...e.g. Classification B for customer with ACCOUNT group of R/3
    You need to also map in CRM  correctly the partner functions and R/3 Partner functions.
    regards,
    PD
    Reward points if it helps...

  • EEWB Fields in PCUI Screen

    Hi All
    I am facing a weird problem for a long time and have not got any documentation to refer.
    I have created a new field through EEWB and want to see it in both Form & List View of Accounts transaction(CRMM_ACCOUNT) in PCUI.
    I realised that extended field through EEWB are created in a Field Group(FG) "CI_EEW_BUT000".  However the "Search Result Area" Field Group  (ACC_SRES_01) contains a 32 Digit Number Field Group in it. Example (4A934616C4104543B9A972B516D6C4E9) . This Field Group in turn contains Field Group "CI_EEW_BUT000".
    However what I have realised is that this dynamic field group number keeps on getting changed.
    But today I can not locate this dynamic field group in the main field group table (Transaction: CRM_BSP_VCLS_FLDGRP) but to my surprise I still find it included in the Field Group "ACC_SRES_01".
    Now the implication is that, I can not see my extended field properly in List View of accounts transaction(crmm_account). I have tried umpteen times to include this field in List view through CRM designer but it is not working. However field is visible in FORM View.
    Does anybody have any idea that how can extended field groups be controlled and how can I display my extended field in List View ?
    Thanks in advance<b></b><b></b>

    Hi Vishal,
    The naming convention sometimes is wrong although it has been created by a standard SAP function or program. Don't worry about this. Many standard PCUI applications are wrong in name conventions terms. Don't care.
    However, naming convention is not the problem with your layout generation (100%), but I'm not sure what's the problem.
    The option you have is to create a new field group, based on the same screen structure than CI_EEW_BUT000 with the same fields. Try to follow the name convention but this is not very important. Regenerate your new field group (with the correspondant view) and try it.
    If not, perhaps the perhaps the Weblog PC-UI and Easy Enhancement Workbench (EEW) Integration helps you.
    Here's the link : <a href="/people/tiest.vangool/blog/2005/07/24/pc-ui-and-easy-enhancement-workbench-eew-integration">/people/tiest.vangool/blog/2005/07/24/pc-ui-and-easy-enhancement-workbench-eew-integration</a>
    Regards
    Message was edited by: Javier Merino Vivar

  • How to delete the structure created from Tx: EEWB ?

    Hi SAP Guru’s
    I have an issue at hand. I have added three components in the structure <b>BUS000___I</b> and the components are <b>ZZ1, ZZ2, ZZ3</b>, I was following the <b>EEWB</b> wizard and from there these three components were made, now I cannot delete these components directly from <b>SE11</b>. Because after adding these components the system is not allowing me to do so and is asking for the access code.
    I am getting a syntax error in all the tx where <b>Business Partner</b> is used. No old versions for this structure was found in the system. The only structure that has come into this BP structure is <b>ZBSTC0000000000</b> followed by three data elements of this structure.
    I know the <b>Project and the enhancement</b> that was created and I have tried deleting the enhancement from EEWB but when i try deleting it, it always fall into an intermediate stage where it leaves some entries and due to these left over entries these errors are coming.
    Another imp thing is that the structure that i have reported is a newly created one I cannot find this anywhere else. looks like this structure was created after executing the EEWB transaction only.
    Now when I try activating the enhancement again the <b>magic wand button</b> used to activate an enhancement and the <b>generate button</b> is also inactive in EEWB and now it is not getting activated, even after rt click enhancement then clicking change or by clicking on the edit-change button on the top tool bar. Do you think if I create another enhancement this button might get activated?
    Please let me know how do I delete these components.
    Kindly reply at the earliest.
    Regards,
    Amit

    Hi, I had the similar problem (and here the solution):
    Spezifikation: Deletion of EEWB fields manually, error in middleware bdoc,  
    Kurztext 
    Deletion of EEWB fields manually, error in middleware bdoc, 
    Langtext 
    BDOC-Error from function module BAPI_CRM_SAVE. no further using of the
    middleware for sales activities (sales order) possible.
    see steps for reconstruction
    Schritte zur Rekonstruktion 
    what done before:
    - added one field via transaction code EEWB to business object
    SALES_TRANSACTION (Verkaufsvorgang), "Erweiterungstyp CUSTOMER_I
    (Positions-Zusatzextension erweitern) with one existing data element
    type Z_, Geschäftsvorgangstypen = Verkauf
    no selection of "Datenaustausch mit den Mobile Clients",
    "Datenaustausch mit R/3 Supply Chain Execution" or
    "Business Information Warehouse".
    - deleted the extension manually, deleted the eewb project manually
    (successful)
    - got an short dump on saving a sales order via transaction code
    CRMD_ORDER:
    dump type: LOAD_TYPE_VERSION_MISMATCH
    Der Abbruch trat im ABAP-Programm "SAPLCRM_UPLOAD" auf, und zwar in
    "CRM_UPLOAD_BUS_TRANS_MSG". Das Hauptprogramm war "CRM_1O_FRAME ".
    Im Quelltext befindet sich die Abbruchstelle in Zeile 5
    des (Include-)Programms "LCRM_UPLOAD$18".
    (bei Anwahl des Editors: 50) der ABAP-Source "LCRM_UPLOAD$18".
    000040 *********************************************************
    FUNCTION $$UNIT$$ CRM_UPLOAD_BUS_TRANS_MSG
    000060
    000070 IMPORTING
    000080 REFERENCE(IV_GUID) TYPE !CRMT_OBJECT_GUID
    000090 EXPORTING
    000100 REFERENCE(ES_BDOC_HEADER) TYPE !SMW3_FHD
    000110 REFERENCE(ES_BDOC_MESSAGE) TYPE !/1CRMG0/BUS_TRANS_MSG
    000120 REFERENCE(ES_BUS_TRANS_MSG) TYPE !BAD_BUS_TRANSN_MESSAGE
    000130 EXCEPTIONS
    000140 !ERROR_OCCURED .
    - re-generation of a lot of of function modules
    (e.g. CRM_UPLOAD_BUS_TRANS_MSG)
    and some corresponding structures (e.g. CRMT_CUSTOMER_I_COM)
    - fixed the short dumps with this gereration
    Current Errors:
    - the crm middleware (mBdoc) cannot copy sales orders from crm to r/3
    - via transaction code CRMD_ORDER i copy an existing sales order and
    save or try to change just one field and save.
    - saving is succesfull (message type s), but on changing again, the
    order is locked by middleware
    - bdoc in transaction SMW02 is on state yellow "An Empfänger gesendet
    (nicht alle haben bestätigt) BUS_TRANS_MSG"
    - in transaction code SMW02 occurs:
    Mdt Benutzer Funktionsbaustein Queue-Name
    100 CPIC_FILO BAPI_CRM_SAVE R3AD_SAL_ERR
    Datum Zeit
    12.04.2007 17:52:10
    Statustext
    Inkonsistenz zwischen den DDIC-Typen CRMT_CUSTOMER_I_COMT und ABAP-
    genera
    SOLUTION:
    re-generation of *ALL* code which using structure CRMT_CUSTOMER_I_COMT had solved it.

  • How to delete the structure created from EEWB ?

    Hi SAP Guru’s
    I have an issue at hand. I have added three components in the structure <b>BUS000___I</b> and the components are <b>ZZ1, ZZ2, ZZ3</b>, I was following the <b>EEWB</b> wizard and from there these three components were made, now I cannot delete these components directly from SE11. Because after adding these components the system is not allowing me to do so and is asking for the access code.
    I am getting a syntax error in all the tx where<b> Business Partner</b> is used. No old versions for this structure was found in the system. The only structure that has come into this <b>BP</b> structure is <b>ZBSTC0000000000</b> followed by three data elements of this structure.
    I know the Project and the enhancement  that was created and I have tried deleting the enhancement from <b>EEWB</b> but when i try deleting it, it always fall into an intermediate stage where it leaves some entries and due to these left over entries these errors are coming.
    Another imp thing is that the structure that i have reported is a newly created one I cannot find this anywhere else. Looks like this structure was created after executing the EEWB transaction only.
    Now when I try activating the enhancement again the <b>magic wand button</b> used to activate an enhancement and the <b>generate button</b> is also inactive in EEWB and now it is not getting activated, even after rt click enhancement then clicking change or by clicking on the edit-change button on the top tool bar.  Do you think if I create another enhancement this button might get activated?
    Please let me know how do I delete these components.
    Kindly reply at the earliest.
    Regards,
    Amit

    Hi Rahul,
    thnx for coming again.......
    this is the error log that is coming up
    Short Descrip            Prog ID      Obj typ        Object name
    Function Module     LIMU       FUNC     ZZG00_BUPA_EVENT_DLVE1
    Function Module     LIMU       FUNC     ZZG00_BUPA_EVENT_DSAVB
    Function Module     LIMU       FUNC     ZZG00_BUPA_EVENT_ISDST
    Function Module     LIMU       FUNC     ZZG00_BUPA_EVENT_ISSTA
    Function Module     LIMU       FUNC     ZZG00_BUPA_EVENT_XCHNG
    Function Module     LIMU       FUNC     ZZG00_BUPA_PAI_ZG000100
    Function Module     LIMU       FUNC     ZZG00_BUPA_PAI_ZG000101
    Function Module     LIMU       FUNC     ZZG00_BUPA_PAI_ZG000102
    Function Module     LIMU       FUNC     ZZG00_BUPA_PBO_ZG000100
    Function Module     LIMU       FUNC     ZZG00_BUPA_PBO_ZG000101
    Function Module     LIMU       FUNC     ZZG00_BUPA_PBO_ZG000102
    Function Module     LIMU       FUNC     ZZTB0000000000T_SELECT_SINGLE
    Function Module     LIMU       FUNC     ZZTB0000000000_SELECT_SINGLE
    Function Module     LIMU       FUNC     ZZTB0000000001T_SELECT_SINGLE
    Function Module     LIMU       FUNC     ZZTB0000000001_SELECT_SINGLE
    Function Module     LIMU       FUNC     ZZTB0000000002T_SELECT_SINGLE
    Function Module     LIMU       FUNC     ZZTB0000000002_SELECT_SINGLE
    Report Source Code     LIMU       REPS                 LZZG00BUPAF01
    Report Source Code     LIMU       REPS                 LZZG00BUPAG24
    Report Source Code     LIMU       REPS                 LZZG00BUPAG27
    Report Source Code     LIMU       REPS                 LZZG00BUPAG30
    Report Source Code     LIMU       REPS                 LZZG00BUPAI00
    Report Source Code     LIMU       REPS                 LZZG00BUPAI01
    Report Source Code     LIMU       REPS                 LZZG00BUPAO01
    Report Source Code     LIMU       REPS                 LZZG00BUPATOP
    Report Source Code     LIMU       REPS                 SAPLZZG00BUPA
    Function Group     R3TR       FUGR     ZZG00BUPA
    Function Group     R3TR       FUGR     ZZG00BUPA_VIEW01
    Function Group     R3TR       FUGR     ZZG00BUPA_VIEW02
    Function Group     R3TR       FUGR     ZZG00BUPA_VIEW03
    DataSource (Active Version)       R3TR                 OSOA     0BPARTNER_ATTR
    DataSource (Active Version)        R3TR     OSOA     Z_ZBU_00000000_TEXT
    DataSource (Active Version)        R3TR     OSOA     Z_ZBU_00000001_TEXT
    DataSource (Active Version)        R3TR     OSOA     Z_ZBU_00000002_TEXT
    Table                            R3TR       TABL     CI_EEW_BUT000_X
    Table                            R3TR       TABL     ZTB0000000000T
    Table                            R3TR       TABL     ZTB0000000001T
    Table                            R3TR       TABL     ZTB0000000002T
    Table Contents     R3TR       TABU     TBZ0A
    Table Contents     R3TR       TABU     TBZ0B
    Table Contents     R3TR       TABU     TBZ0C
    Table Contents     R3TR       TABU     TBZ1C
    Table Contents     R3TR       TABU     TBZ1F
    Table Contents     R3TR       TABU     TBZ3A
    Table Contents     R3TR       TABU     TBZ3B
    Table Contents     R3TR       TABU     TBZ3C
    Table Contents     R3TR       TABU     TBZ3D
    Table Contents     R3TR       TABU     TBZ3E
    Table Contents     R3TR       TABU     TBZ3F
    Table Contents     R3TR       TABU     TBZ3I
    Table Contents     R3TR       TABU     TBZ3K
    Table Contents     R3TR       TABU     TBZ3R
    Table Contents     R3TR       TABU     TBZ3S
    Table Contents     R3TR       TABU     TBZ3W
    Table Contents     R3TR       TABU     TBZ3X
    Table Contents     R3TR       TABU     TDDAT
    Table Contents     R3TR       TABU     TVDIR
    View Maintenance: Data        R3TR     VDAT     V_TBZ3H
    View                      R3TR       VIEW     ZTB0000000000V
    View                      R3TR       VIEW     ZTB0000000001V
    View                      R3TR       VIEW     ZTB0000000002V
    and there is a delete icon by the side of every line but when i try deleting any entry it says object name does not exist.
    Please help.
    Regards,
    Amit

  • Need to add extra fields in Custom tab  using EEWB.

    hi ,
    I extended business partner with 10 custom fields using EEWB by creating an custom tab. I would like to add 2 more fields in the same custom tab . I am unable to find the provision to add new field to the existing project. so i am deleting the existing project and creating new project and adding all the =and new fields.
    Now when I am creating new project  i am loosing the old field names. It creating the new fields with new field names.
    My requirement is I should create a new fields without changing the old field names.
    So Please can any one help me as how to approach these without deletion or changing the existing field names.
    Finally my custom tab should contain 12 fields.
    Thanks
    viswa

    Hi viswa,
    I have a requirement to add 2 new fields to the Standard Transaction (called <b>BP</b> ).
    I have gone through various concepts like <b>EEWB and BDT</b> tools. But, still I am not able to get the things well.
    So please provide me with the procedure to explore things and work on the requirement.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Vishnu.

  • Without EEWB Is it Possible to add field to standard tab

    Hi Experts!
    Without EEWB and enhancing Screen Is it Possible to adding field to standard tab. Any body can help out in this.
    URGENT
    Thanks
    vikram.c

    Yes it is possible, but we are talking a modification of SAP standard here. Also the effort needed will be at least 10 times higher than using EEWB as you have to reprogram all generated code / screen helps that SAP provides. Moreover these fields are then still not exchanged with the interfaces / BDocs etc which will be also some more days of work. There is no usable documentation on this - at least not by SAP and I am not aware of another one. It is much easier to create an EEWB enhancement and then move the fields from one tab to another.
    Doing this all by hand is like adding a second processor to an existing motherboard for more performance compared to exchanging the existing one with one of higher specifications.This is possible, but requires a) more work/time/material b) more experience c) you lose warranty d) in the end you do not know for sure what the outcome will be
    Regards, Kai

  • BP EEWB field in CRM to  ECC zfield in KAN1

    Hello  all ..
    I have added  few custom fields to BP through EEWB  and want them to replicate to ECC .
    Here are the steps I followed ...
    We are on CRM 5.0 and ECC 6.0
    1) Added the fields in same order as EEWB in  BSS_CENTIX (component type GB_BAPIUPD ) and BSS_CENTI ( data element/domain same as in BUT000)  in ECC
    2) Maintained table TBE24, Create a product and mark it active in ECC.
        Maintained  table TBE34 for the event DE_BALE with same product  and Function module = Z_INTERFACE_DE_BALE
    ( copy of SAMPLE_INTERFACE_DE_BALE  ) in ECC
    3) I wrote  the code in Z_INTERFACE_DE_BALE and mapped the custom fields to structures in the CT_IDOC_DATA.
    I have mapped custom field/Z field in KNA1 to  the eewb field  in  Z_INTERFACE_DE_BALE   like this...
    extended the Idoc  i.e added a custom segment ZE1KNA1M under E1KNA1M
    But still the field is not getting replicated. ( though eewb fields are replicated to standard fields in Kna1)
    Hope Iu2019m clear with my question.
    Thanks in advance.

    Hi Aday,
    We have similar kind of requirement. Would like to know whether you are using BDOC to transfer BP created in CRM to R3? In this function module Z_INTERFACE_DE_BALE, if we populate the idoc structure for the required fields will it update the customer with required field information.
    Thanks in advance. Your help is highly required.
    Regads,
    Ranadev

Maybe you are looking for