EHSM: Use Auth Check BAdI to hide Incident

Hi all,
I have enhanced the standard Auth Check BAdI BADI_EHHSS_INC_EXT_AUTH_CHECK for EHSM. Works like a charm. But I just got another requirement and thought maybe someone else has done this before.
Right now, I have it set up so people with out the correct access can only view incidents. Is there a way to use the BAdI to completely hide an incident when a user clicks on it?
Hope this makes sense.
Cheers,
Kevin

Hey all,
Our requirements ended up changing a bit but ended up putting authorization checks into class methods that control visibility for the sections of EHSM that we wanted to hide. So, we got the result we were looking for.
Cheers,
Kevin

Similar Messages

BRFPlus - Control Rule maintenance using Auth checks (BADI?)

Hello BRFPlus gurus,
We are reviewing BRFPlus for use in our global project and here is our question.
We want to develop some rules, for use in Business Workflow, using BRFPlus and make them available for change to users. Some of these rules are going to be based on company code and we want to control rule maintenance based on company code to ensure users can only modify/create/display rule (e.g. decision table entries) entries only for the company code that they belong to. e.g. user for company code 0001 should not be able to change decision table entry for company code 0002.
currently we have similar rules maintained using ECC custom table maintenance and we use table maintenance Events' to code authority checks for custom auth objects.
I am wondering if BRFPlus has any BADI (or similar mechanism) available to allow us program these auth checks depending on 'Element' values.
I would greatly appreciate your response.
Thanks,
Saurabh

Hi Carsten,
Thanks for making us aware of that hidden feature that we could use.
would you mind sharing some high-leve steps that we could follow to complete the BRFPlus prototype we are doing?
Ability to control modification of these objects using auth is one of the key criteria for prototype success .
Looking forward to learn more about this rule engine.
Thanks,
Saurabh

Mixed bag 1.     I have a security app on my computer, Flashbrief. I have it checked in the hide column but whenever I turn on the computer it appears in the top menu line. 2.     Whenever I turn on the computer, a new blank document window in MS Word

mixed bag
1.         I have a security app on my computer, Flashbrief. I have it checked in the hide column but whenever I turn on the computerit appears in the top menu line.
2.         Whenever Iturn on the computer, a new blank document window in MS Word 2011 appears. I do not have this listed in the login items.
3.         I have a current model of Apple wireless mouse. It keeps getting stuck in text or e-mails and I have to somehowotherwise move the cursor to break it free.
Help with any of these will be appreciated.
BF

1.         I have a security app on my computer, Flashbrief. I have it checked in the hide column but whenever I turn on the computerit appears in the top menu line.
I've never heard of this software, and cannot find any reference to it online, which is a bit concerning. What is it supposed to do? There really isn't much need for security software on a Mac.
2.         Whenever Iturn on the computer, a new blank document window in MS Word 2011 appears. I do not have this listed in the login items.
In Mac OS X 10.7, any applications left open when you shut down or restart are re-opened at startup, and any documents left open in an app when you quit are re-opened when you launch them again. The former can be controlled by unchecking the box in the restart/shutdown alert:
You will need to do this each time you shut down or restart, it won't remember that setting.
The latter can be deactivated by unchecking the box in System Preferences -> General:
3.         I have a current model of Apple wireless mouse. It keeps getting stuck in text or e-mails and I have to somehowotherwise move the cursor to break it free.
That does not sound normal, but I don't use a mouse with my MBP, so I can't provide a solution, other than to try replacing the batteries in the mouse.

BBP_PD_MSG_ADD issue in CHECK badi

Hi all,,
SRM 5.0 ECS
I want to display an error message in the cofnirmation screen bit in the form op a POP UP !
I tried using the FM BBP_PD_MSG_ADD in the CHECK badi but it doesnt display the message in the pop up format!
The strange thing is that the pop up msg is being displayed in the search list screen before I click on CREATE CONFIRMATION button!
I want the pop up msg to be displayed after the user clicks on the next screen after user clicks on create confirmation button...
Please help as to where I am going wrong....
Here is my code:
IF flt_val = 'BUS2203'.
    IF sy-ucomm = 'BUTTON_CHECK'.
REFRESH et_messages.
      CALL FUNCTION 'BBP_PD_CONF_GETDETAIL'
        EXPORTING
          i_guid          = iv_doc_guid
          i_with_itemdata = 'X'
        IMPORTING
          e_header        = lt_conf_header
        TABLES
          e_item          = lt_conf_item.
      LOOP AT lt_conf_item INTO ls_conf_item.
*get the PO # and doc type
        lv_po = lt_conf_header-be_refobj+0(10).
        CALL FUNCTION 'BBP_PD_PO_GETDETAIL'
          EXPORTING
            i_object_id = lv_po
          IMPORTING
            e_header    = lt_po_header.
        IF lt_po_header-process_type = 'ECV' .
CALL FUNCTION 'BBP_PD_MSG_ADD'
              EXPORTING
                i_msgty       = 'W'
                i_msgid       = 'BBP_SC'
                i_msgno       = '014'
                i_msgv1       = text-001
*            i_doc_guid    = iv_doc_guid
                i_field_name = 'EXPRESS'
              EXCEPTIONS
                log_not_found = 1
                OTHERS        = 2.
EXIT.
ENDIF.
ENDLOOP.
    ENDIF.

Thanks Jay.
If I change the SY_UCOMM to that of "CREATE CONFIRMATION" button,custom message does get displayed in POP UP form,but then the next screen (which should be displayed after lcicking on CREATE CONFIRMATION button) is not dsplayed and controlstays on the same screen which is worse!
Please let me know if something wrongly written in my code or if SRM CONFIRMATION screen is designed in such a way that custom messages cannot be diplaye din form of pop up!

My file names have disappeared in grid view. Thery have been replaced with a dark bar along the bottom of the previews. If I toggle using the command u it hide the bar but I still can't see the file name. In list view all the file names are OK.

My file names have disappeared in grid view. Thery have been replaced with a dark bar along the bottom of the previews. If I toggle using the command u it hide the bar but I still can't see the file name. In list view all the file names are OK.

The dark bar is caused by the option "Show metadata below image".
Check the settings for the metadata overlays in Grid view (basic and expanded) by clicking the little "badge" icon below the Browser and selecting "Edit". Is the filename still enabled in the list? And in a high enough position to have precedence for other metadata tags, if the space does not suffice to show all selected tags?
Regards
Léonie

What FM can I use to check the budget in shopping cart?

Hi Gurus,
I want to check budget in shopping cart in badi BBP_DOC_CHECK_BADI in SRM.
Budget information is in ERP system (ECC 6.0).
What function module can I use to check budget in shopping cart?
How can I off standard budget check for specific cases?
My system is:
SRM 7.0 (SRM_SERVER 700 Level 8)
ECC 6.0 (SAP_APPL 604 Level 6)

Hi,
Please look at FM B470_BUDGET_READ in SRM.
Regards,
Masa

Can we give more than one value for an Authorization field in Auth-Check.

Hi all,
Can we give more than one value for an Authorization field in Auth-Check.
Ex: AUTHORITY-CHECK OBJECT 'S_TRVL_BKS'
ID 'ACTVT' FIELD '02'
ID 'CUSTTYPE' FIELD <Value 1> <Value 2> <Value 3>.
IF SY-SUBRC 0.
MESSAGE E...
ENDIF.
If yes, please help me with exact syntax.
Think it will be like
ID 'CUSTTYPE' FIELD: <Value 1>, <Value 2>, <Value 3>.

Hi,
yes we can give more than one field.
program an AUTHORITY-CHECK.
AUTHORITY-CHECK OBJECT <authorization object>
   ID <authority field 1> FIELD <field value 1>.
   ID <authority field 2> FIELD <field value 2>.
   ID <authority-field n> FIELD <field value n>.
The OBJECT parameter specifies the authorization object.
The ID parameter specifies an authorization field (in the authorization object).
The FIELD parameter specifies a value for the authorization field.
The authorization object and its fields have to be suitable for the transaction. In most cases you will be able to use the existing authorization objects to protect your data. But new developments may require that you define new authorization objects and fields.
please reward points, if it is useful.
satish.

Need to deactivate structural auth. check for a custom Report

Hi all experts:
I have a report that is based on PNPCE logical database and it displays work hours for a project, all non-sensitive information. We would like a wide range of users to have access to this but since this is based on PNPCE logical database whenever a user runs it, the str. authorization check is performed. I have tried deactivate this check with P_ABAP object and coers 2 but it only ignores infotype auth. check but still checks the structural. We don't want to expand str. profile for users.
Do you know if there is a way to deactive this just for one report?
Your help will be greatly appreciated.
Regards,
Net

Thanks Kiran. I had tried that value but still got the same message. I am having problem understanding exactly when this value 2 ignores structural authorization because it works on some reports and not others. Anyway, we implemented BADI for this report to ignore structural auth. check and it is working fine.
Thanks again,
NT

Sec. Optimization self-service - Customer specific auth Checks

Hi There,
checking some automatic check like 0750 I see in SolMan there are some tabs like Green, Red, Recommendation (0705)
checking the Customer specific auth Checks I found out only some of them.... I would be interested to know if it is possible to configure "something" in order to have the tab Recommendation (9XXX) for Customer specific auth Checks .
Thanks
FedeX.

Hi,
I still test and no quit sure if I am doing the right process...what I have done:
use st13 to create my own alerts > 9000.
use st14 for creating the report on target system... I check on the target system and by viewing data of the generated report there is a list of users because security specification > 9000.
export report to SolMan ... successfully
on SolMan ... what are the steps that I have to do?..I am not quit sure ... I go to session workbench ...here there are already some info of the previous check that I did days before ...... I click on the option collect data (ST13, ST14)..I delete the old number and introduce the new GUI Number and click on collect button... the rest of the fields are filled in ... and no additional message appear..
one of the existing entries on the left side is Customer specific Auth check ...it is in red..
being on the collect data (ST13, ST14) entry I just click on save + next open check an the focus/cursor jump automatically to the last entry check session consistency I do not identify any change in the entry Customer specific Auth check which still red and not showing the expected list ( what I see in target system)
well hope this give some idea about the issue and possible solution
Thanks
FedeX

Deselect auth. check for infocubes (Checks for infocubes) in RSSM

Hi,
An infocube I installed contains an authorisation relavant object (already exists) in BW3.5 system. By default the infocube is selected for auth. check in RSSM.
After I transported the cube to target system I realised the auth check in RSSM has also been transported with the cube.
Hence, I have deselected the auth. check for the infocube "Checks for infocubes" in RSSM and saved it. Then, I created a second transport and only transported the cube. But the changes I made in RSSM hasn't been transported.
Please can you advise me how to transport the changes I made in "Checks for infocubes" in RSSM?
Thanks a lot
Murali

Hi,
check this threads:
Re: RSSM: Checks Authorization Objects for Infoprovider are not activ
Re: RSSM Transports
Normally system would check all the authorization relevant objects whenever a new Info cube is imported and in case if you want to transport these changes to Production system manually then follow the below listed steps:
1) In Development system, check or un-check the authorization relevancy using the transaction RSSM on a given Info provider
2) These changes are stored in table RSSTOBJDIR
3) Create a manuall transport request and include these entries covering the required Authorization objects manually.
R3TR TABU RSSTOBJDIR
Ex: If Info object 'A' is authorization relevant in Development system but not in Production system and you want to transport this change to Production system then include object 'A' table entries manually.
Regards
Andreas

Using AUTHORITY-CHECK

I would like to add a checking whether the user allow access va02 or not. I've created an authorization object. And i know i have to program using AUTHORITY-CHECK. But i don't know where should I place the code. Thanks!

In general different users will be given different authorizations based on their role in the orgn.
We create ROLES and assign the Authorization and TCODES for that role, so only that user can have access to those T Codes.
USe SUIM and SU21 T codes for this.
Much of the data in an R/3 system has to be protected so that unauthorized users cannot access it. Therefore the appropriate authorization is required before a user can carry out certain actions in the system. When you log on to the R/3 system, the system checks in the user master record to see which transactions you are authorized to use. An authorization check is implemented for every sensitive transaction.
If you wish to protect a transaction that you have programmed yourself, then you must implement an authorization check.
This means you have to allocate an authorization object in the definition of the transaction.
For example:
program an AUTHORITY-CHECK.
AUTHORITY-CHECK OBJECT <authorization object>
ID <authority field 1> FIELD <field value 1>.
ID <authority field 2> FIELD <field value 2>.
ID <authority-field n> FIELD <field value n>.
The OBJECT parameter specifies the authorization object.
The ID parameter specifies an authorization field (in the authorization object).
The FIELD parameter specifies a value for the authorization field.
The authorization object and its fields have to be suitable for the transaction. In most cases you will be able to use the existing authorization objects to protect your data. But new developments may require that you define new authorization objects and fields.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/52/67167f439b11d1896f0000e8322d00/content.htm
To ensure that a user has the appropriate authorizations when he or she performs an action, users are subject to authorization checks.
Authorization : An authorization enables you to perform a particular activity in the SAP System, based on a set of authorization object field values.
You program the authorization check using the ABAP statement AUTHORITY-CHECK.
AUTHORITY-CHECK OBJECT 'S_TRVL_BKS'
ID 'ACTVT' FIELD '02'
ID 'CUSTTYPE' FIELD 'B'.
IF SY-SUBRC 0.
MESSAGE E...
ENDIF.
'S_TRVL_BKS' is a auth. object
ID 'ACTVT' FIELD '02' in place 2 you can put 1,2, 3 for change create or display.
The AUTHORITY-CHECK checks whether a user has the appropriate authorization to execute a particular activity.
This Authorization concept is somewhat linked with BASIS people.
As a developer you may not have access to access to SU21 Transaction where you have to define, authorizations, Objects and for nthat object you assign fields and values. Another Tcode is PFCG where you can assign these authrization objects and TCodes for a profile and that profile in turn attached to a particular user.
Take the help of the basis Guy and create and use.
Sy-SUBRC values
4 User has no authorization in the SAP System for
such an action. If necessary, change the user
master record.
8 Too many parameters (fields, values). Maximum
allowed is 10.
12 Specified object not maintained in the user
master record.
16 No profile entered in the user master record.
24 The field names of the check call do not match
those of an authorization. Either the
authorization or the call is incorrect.
28 Incorrect structure for user master record.
32 Incorrect structure for user master record.
36 Incorrect structure for user master record.
Pls reward pts if help.

High memory use when checking downloads folder through browser

High memory use when checking downloads folder through browser.
I have a total of 3 DDR2 Gbytes of ram. Pentium(R) Dual-Core CPU T4500 @ 2.30GHz Win 7 home pr. 64bit. Firefox 27.0 beta
I right click on a file to "open containing folder" from the drop down menu in downloads.
When the folder has been opened, explorer is trying to index the folder (which it never does completely or well after 5 minutes I close the folder and shut down the dllhost process cause laptop is blazing hot) and memory keeps increasing till no more is available.
I checked task manager and see that dllhost is the particular process that is causing the spike in memory usage even after closing the folder I right click and stop the process and memory is restored after awhile.

Hello,
'''Try Firefox Safe Mode''' to see if the problem goes away. Safe Mode is a troubleshooting mode, which disables most add-ons.
''(If you're not using it, switch to the Default theme.)''
* On Windows you can open Firefox 4.0+ in Safe Mode by holding the '''Shift''' key when you open the Firefox desktop or Start menu shortcut.
* On Mac you can open Firefox 4.0+ in Safe Mode by holding the '''option''' key while starting Firefox.
* On Linux you can open Firefox 4.0+ in Safe Mode by quitting Firefox and then going to your Terminal and running: firefox -safe-mode (you may need to specify the Firefox installation path e.g. /usr/lib/firefox)
* Or open the Help menu and click on the '''Restart with Add-ons Disabled...''' menu item while Firefox is running.
[[Image:FirefoxSafeMode|width=520]]
''Once you get the pop-up, just select "'Start in Safe Mode"''
[[Image:Safe Mode Fx 15 - Win]]
'''''If the issue is not present in Firefox Safe Mode''''', your problem is probably caused by an extension, and you need to figure out which one. Please follow the [[Troubleshooting extensions and themes]] article for that.
''To exit the Firefox Safe Mode, just close Firefox and wait a few seconds before opening Firefox for normal use again.''
''When you figure out what's causing your issues, please let us know. It might help other users who have the same problem.''
Thank you.

System error message while using maps check in

today i got a lot of system error messages while using maps check in feature, and i tried everything from factory default to reinstalling mobile software and formating everything and yet nothing changed idk what to do and i use the maps application a lot of times so i need this problem fixed please
am using Nokia 500 btw

today i got a lot of system error messages while using maps check in feature, and i tried everything from factory default to reinstalling mobile software and formating everything and yet nothing changed idk what to do and i use the maps application a lot of times so i need this problem fixed please
am using Nokia 500 btw

What command would you use to check for allocation, structural, or logical integrity problems?

What command would you use to check for allocation, structural, or logical integrity problems?

Wondering if you are looking for DBCC CHECKDB command? For more information, on that command, try to look at this:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms176064.aspx

I have bought a used macbook, to bad i do not have the admin password. is there any way to bypass this issue with out the Mac OS X disk? (without loosing my obtained files?)

i have bought a used macbook, to bad i do not have the admin password. is there any way to bypass this issue with out the Mac OS X disk? (without loosing my obtained files?) I NEED HELP BADLY PLEASE....

What version of the Mac OS X are you running. Go to the Apple in the upper left corner and select About This Mac and post the version.

EHSM: Use Auth Check BAdI to hide Incident

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for