Employee and applicant infotype

HI all,
I need to know the concept of employee and applicant master data.
Also, the difference between employee and applicant infotype?.
Regards,
Shanthi

Hi,
Find below characteristics of few applicant infotypes.
1. IT4000(Applicant action):-The Applicant Actions infotype (4000) serves as a record of all applicant actions carried out for an applicant. These applicant actions can be:
Data entry procedures (e.g. Initial entry of basic data, Enter additional data )
Procedures that change the overall status of the applicant (e.g. Reject applicant, Put applicant on hold)
The time constraint for this infotype is 1.
2. IT4001(Applications):- The Applications infotype (4001) is used to store information on whether an application was made in response to an advertisement, or is an unsolicited application.
The time constraint for this infotype is 3.
3. IT4002 (Vacancy Assignment):-You can assign the applicant to a vacancy. The applicant will then be included in the selection procedure for this vacancy. The applicantu2019s vacancy assignment status shows where the applicant is in the selection procedure.
The time constraint for this infotype is 2.
4. IT4003 (Applicant Activities):- Applicant activities are administrative stages through which an applicant passes during the course of the application procedure. Correspondence with applicants is also handled by means of applicant activities.
The time constraint for this infotype is 3.
5. IT4004 (Status of Applicant Activity):-The Status of Applicant Activity (4004) infotype is a technical infotype that stores the status of the activities you have performed for the applicant.
6. IT4005 (Applicantu2019s Personnel Number):-The system enters this number automatically in the corresponding Applicantu2019s Personnel Number infotype (4005) for all internal applicants. This means that it contains a data record for each internal applicant.
The time constraint for this infotype is B.
7. IT0139 (Employeeu2019s Applicant Number):- This infotype can be used for following purposes.
An external applicant enters the company as an employee.
The internal applicant who is already a company employee occupies the vacant position
I think it will help you.
Regards,
Purnima

Similar Messages

Ex-Employees and Applicants appearing in newly created Learner Groups

Hi :-)
I have created a learner group and added an organization 'XYZ' as a component assignment.
If I see the members of the learner group, I could see Active, Ex-Employees and Applicants of 'XYZ' org in the list.
Why are Ex-Employees and Applicants added as members of the group ?
Is this an intended functionality or a bug?
Thanks in Advance :)
Thanks,
Versa.

Not in the current release.
But in the next version (will be released very soon), it is possible to use Eligibility Profiles to define Learner Groups. And in Eligibility Profiles you can define whether they should include applicants, employees etc.
Regards
Anders

Conversion of Employees and Applicants.

We are in the process of designing the conversion mapping and scripts.
Our client has requested that we migrate all Histroy data pertaining to an Employee which means a person could have been an applicant and then later becomes an Employee.
In such a scenario how would we migrate an applicant and later also migrate the same person as an employee. Pls advice.
Also can an employee creation be date tracked when importing using the create_employee API .
I see that the effective_start_date and effective_End_date are out parameters and not in parameters.
Thanks,
Muthu.

Hi Muthu,
From where are you migrating the data ?
Is it from one instance of Oracle Apps to another ? say 11i to R12 ?
Are you merging systems ?
Not many people would do migration of such extent.
I'm afraid you might have to loop through all the records for each person and then use APIs suitable.
HR_APPLICANT_API;
HR_EMPLOYEE_API;
HR_EX_EMPLOYEE_API;
Also log an SR with Oracle to see if there is any conversion utility to ease the process.
Cheers,
Vignesh

Correct DFF Values do not display for Employee.Ex-Applicants

Applicants are entered in self service. When pulled up in the forms, the correct dff context displays. The applicants are then hired (person type is now Employee.Ex-Applicant). When the person is pulled up in the forms, the dff context for applicant is still displayed.
Correct dff contexts are displayed if all transactions are entered via the forms, which is not part of the business process, and is therefore not a workaround.
Has anyone else seen this behavior? Other than physically changing the context in the form, is there a way to get this to work?
Any suggestions are appreciated!
Best wishes,
Nicole

it looks like the value of the column atribute_category is not changed, so self still thinks he is an applicant.
A little script to help the application can be a work around.

LSMW for PA70 Tcode and APPRAISAL infotype in HR ABAP

Hi Experts,
Please help on this, how to create LSMW for PA70 transaction and appraisal Infotype in HR ABAP.
Thanks,
Kumar.

Try searching BDC for table control.
Lot of things are available you need to include that .
For Appraisal.
Check using below FM and try to develop a legacy data upload prog
RHPA_APPRAISAL_DELETE - To delete the appraisal
RHPA_APPRAISAL_ACTIVATE - To activate appraisal before modification
RHPA_APPRAISAL_READ - To change rating and status for an employee
RHPA_APPRAISAL_1045_MODIFY - To modify rating and change date for appraisal
RHPA_APPRAISAL_HISTORICIZE - To change status of appraisal to completed
Performing all actions in order should help to load appraisals.
Thanks

Need to upload employee photos against infotype 0002

Hi,
We have an urgent reqirement to load the photos of all the employees agianst the infotype 0002 which need to be accesed by the employees and managers via enterprise portal.
Can anybody help me....
Thanks in advance
Krishna

The steps provided you are very appropiate , but you can also check the following settings incase you dnt achieve your requirements.
Q. How to attached the Photo in IT0002
1.Create a number range for SAP Archive Link :
IMG>Basis Components>Basis Services>SAP Archive Link>Basic Settings>Maintain number ranges.
Tcode OANR. Create range 01 from 0000000001 to 9999999999 without the external number flag.
2.Document type HRICOLFOTO must exist with document class JPG.
IMG>Basis Components>Basis Services>SAP Archive Link>System Settings>Maintain document types.
Table TOAVE, Tcode OAC2.
3.Document type HRICOLFOTO must be linked to object type PREL and IT0002.
IMG>Personnel Management>Personnel Administration>Tools>Optical Archiving>Set up Optical Archiving in HR.
View V_T585O, no Tcode. In all three columns there ara minuses, dont put a flag in the check box.
4.Check which content repository (Archive) is linked to document type HRICOLFOTO and object type PREL.
IMG>Basis Components>Basis Services>SAP Archive Link>Basic Settings>Maintain Links.
Table TOAOM_C, Tcode OAC3
5.Create this content repository with storage type FILE archive.
IMG>Basis Components>Basis Services>SAP Archive Link>Basic Settings>Maintain content repositories.
Tcode OAC0
Storage type FILE archive can be attained by clicking on the field Storage type and clicking somewhere else in the screen with the right mouse button. Choose Possible entries and only then you get a list of all values. FILE Archive is entry number 08. Choose Version no. 0031 and Archive path something (e.g. C:\).
6.Link photo to personnel number.
Menu>Tools>Business Documents>Miscellaneous>Stored Documents. Tcode OAAD.
Click on the Create button. Business object PREL and Docyment type HRICOLFOTO. Click on create (fill in the right personnel number in the pop up and click Continue). Choose the photo (as a JPG file) from the place where it is saved (e.g. hard disk). SAP will notify that the Stored Document was created succesfully. Photo is visible via PA10, PA20, PA30, PA40. Double-click to magnify photo.
To delete archived document :
Tcode OAAD, click Find. In docyment type field select HRICOLFOTO and after execute you get a list of all documents. Select appropriate document and click on delete icon.
thnkx
bhanu

PO13 and 0001 infotype (HR_INFOTYPE_OPERATION + badi HRBAS00INFTY

Hello Friends,
We have cretaed a position description subtype and assigned it to 1002 infotype.
Query: 1) Adding 2 customer fields(Subtype and description) to infotype 0001 (This is done using PM01).
2) Using Po13, they assign a subtype(position description) for a particular Position.
Now the requirement is When they assign subtype to a postion in PO13 and save then these subtype
and subtype description should be stored in 0001 infotype.
the position should use to locate the employee and once the employee have been located update 0001.
for ths I have implemented a PO13 badi HRBAS00INFTY(IN updating method) and inside the BADI we are calling
HR_INFOTYPE_OPERATION' to update the eMPLOYEE(0001 INFOTYPE).
Problem: Now the problem is , when we open PO13 in change mode to assign a subtype to Position ,sap creates a lock entry and when svae we are call
HR_INFOTYPE_OPERATION' to update the eMPLOYEE(0001 INFOTYPE).but HR_INFOTYPE_OPERATION' also internally tries to lock the position but raising a
message "You have already locked object/infotype S50000024".
Pleae find below function and follwoing parameter I am suing for updating the person(0001 infotype) .
I dont understand why HR_INFOTYPE_OPERATION is trying to lock position when I pass Pernr and 0001 as a parametr.
CALL FUNCTION 'HR_INFOTYPE_OPERATION'
EXPORTING
infty = c_infty
number = wa_pernr-pernr
SUBTYPE =
OBJECTID =
lockindicator = 'X'
validityend = wa_pernr-endda
validitybegin = wa_pernr-begda
RECORDNUMBER =
record = it_0001
operation = 'MOD'
tclas = 'A'
dialog_mode = '0'
NOCOMMIT =
VIEW_IDENTIFIER =
SECONDARY_RECORD =
IMPORTING
Please help me .
Thanks In advance
Best Regards
Trupthi

Hi,
Onemore thing I couldn't find the code for IF_EX_HRBAS00INFTY-in_update.
For every BADI there will be an example interface. Here for this BADI example is IF_EX_HRBAS00INFTY. If u want to see the model code, go to SE24 and give the name :IF_EX_HRBAS00INFTY and click on display. Then you can find the methods and respective exapmle code.
One more thing
Some BADIs will not allow calling commit work. In your BADI also already one LUW is opened, so it will not allow to open another LUW and the respective commit work.
Thanks and Regards,
Chandra

Global employee and authorization

Hi,
I've got the following issue from our business:
A administrator from one foreign country without any access (no authorization) to an germany employee should be able to create a short or long term assignment action. The administrator knows the Global ID of the employee and wants to make a new hire action with this global ID (we have tested this procedure with a unlimited user and it works fine).
We have already tested it with a limited User and we failed because of missing reading authorization to infotyp 0000.
Does anyone see a change to realize this issue without opening the "normal" authorization?
Are there any customizing settings for the Global ID, that we forgot?
And if we have to "open" the authorization, what do you think are the minimum required infotypes (I would guess 0000, 0001)?
Thanks
Walter

Hi Walter ,
when ever you face such missing authourisations, then you just open another session with the TCODE -SU53 which will describes the detailed missing Authourisations then u will come to know which Authourisations were missing for your perticular action. and ask your Basis consultant to look into these missing authourisation, he will resolve it for you.
Regards,
Narendra Kumar Katuri.

Where is link between 0007 and 0008 infotype

Dear Members,
Where is link between 0007 and 0008 infotype.How the system automatically populating WORK HOURS/PERIOD AND CAPACITY UTIL .LEVEL.where is integration .
Regards
Nandhini

Hi,
>For your first question: Working Hours/Period field in IT 0008 is determined by the Planned Working Time infotype (0007).
>The Weekly / Monthly Working Hours field in IT 0007 are system determined the specified value from the work schedule rule. Capacity utilization level is related to Infotype 0008. The relationship is that an employees basic salary and its related components are stored here and are paid based on the working hours of the employee which is obtained from Infotype 0007 and multiplied by the capacity utilzation which under normal circumstances is 100 %. If the employee belonging to the same pay scale group and level works part time say half of the normal time, you can maintain his capacity utilisation as 50% instead of maintaining seperate values in the wage types.
Regards
Chandrashekar

Who holds Verizon employees and management accountable and where can I file a complaint.

I feel that writing this letter is a waste of time, but I feel the way customer service reps (not all) as well as their managers (again not all) need to held accountable for lies and disrespectful business practices they place on loyal customers. This is a long and confusing issue, but in as short as possible, I have been a loyal Verizon Wireless customer for several years. This past September 2014, I along with about 200 other loyal customers waited for several hours in anticipation of the IPhone 6 being released outside of a big box Verizon Store located at 7790 Montgomery Rd, Cincinnati, OH 45236, phone number (513) 984-9939. Because of my early arrival, I was number two in line and number two to enter the store once opened. At approximately 7:30 a.m., Verizon Store employees and an unknown woman claiming to be a manager came from the store with flyers in hand and explained the purchase process. She advised customers were able to buy a maximum of three phones, but could only buy one phone at retail price without contract. I informed the manager that I was not eligible for an upgrade at the time, as my wife and I still had about a year of service left on my current contract. At that time I was told “too bad, there are a lot of customers here for the same thing, and if you want the iPhones you will have to add two lines of service.” I had about $2000.00 in my hand willing to pay full price for phones and have them swapped out for my current devices and was told “too bad.” Well after waiting in line for the amount of time I had, I pretty much had no other choice, entered the store, and paid for two new lines of service in order to get two IPhone 6 plus devices with 128 gb of storage.
Immediate upon returning home, I contacted Verizon customer service (phone call one 9/19/14) and requested to terminate both lines, and move the IPhone 6 plus phones to my original lines. Upon explaining the situation to the customer service rep, he was confused as to why I was told I had to open two new lines, but complied. Later in the night, I had realized service was still not activated on the lines after switching the IPhone 6 plus to my original numbers and call customer service again (call two 9/19/14). After explaining the whole situation over again, I was again informed that the store was wrong and should not have made me add two new lines. This customer service rep informed me of the cancellation fees ($350.00 per line x 2), which I told her I was aware, and had planned to pay $950.00 per phone originally so had no problem paying the termination fee. The customer service rep again told me that all had been completed and the lines would be turned off.
On Saturday September 20, 2014, I signed on to my Verizon wireless.com account and saw that I still had two lines (previously told were shut off) still active on my account, with no phones associated with the numbers. Again, upon contacting customer service (call 3 9/20/2014) I had to explain the entire situation all over. At that time I was advised by the customer service rep, that because I was not returning the phones and just wished to pay the termination fees, that I would need to wait until after 14 days of service to call in and cancel the lines, and also have to request a refund on the activation fees (should be waived if canceled within 72 hours of activation) and any service charges associated with having two lines with no physical phones actually being attached to them. At this point I thanked the customer service rep and was informed that all notations to the account were visible in the account to anyone I spoke with.
Friday October 3, 2014, I again contacted Verizon customer service (call 4 10/3/2014) to cancel these lines. Upon explaining the situation again to the customer service rep, I was informed the store I got the phones from (A VERIZON WIRELESS OWNED STORE) had lied to me in that I needed to add lines. At this point, the female representative informed me the activation fees would be waived, along with any other fees, and the lines were cancelled.
Saturday October 4, 2014 I again logged onto my Verizon Wireless.com account and saw that the lines I was told had twice been removed, were still active and alive with no physical devices actually being associated with the lines of service. AGAIN, calling customer service (call 5 10/4/2014) I spoke with a gentleman and expressed my frustrations as to being misinformed several times thus far. At this point, the customer service rep, after keeping me on hold for about 45 minutes, returned to the phone and advised my that the lines were set for cancelation, but not until my next billing cycle, and that I would need to call in again once all service, activation, and whatever else charges were put on my account to have them removed. During the conversation, (without me asking for a single thing at any point during the conversation except just to have the lines turned off and refund the fees) The customer service rep informed me that he was sorry and his manager was sorry for inconvenience that VERIZON had caused me, as a small toke of VERIZON’s appreciation, VERIZON would waive any and all fees associated with the two lines I was forced to add, to include any and all early termination fees. Again, I never once asked for anything, but was offered by VERIZON employees and a VERIZON manager. I was also informed that when I did call back in, the next customer service rep would see all of these offers in my account notations and would comply.
Tuesday October 7, 2014, I was able to view my bill and had observed the added charges associated with account activation, and lines of service. At that point I again called Verizon customer service (Call 6, 10/7/2014) to have these charges removed. Upon calling and AGAIN explaining the two weeks of hell VERIZON had caused me, I was again apologized to, and informed that the last customer service rep had notated everything as I had explained and was informed and exactly quoted by the representative from VERIZON “We are nothing without our integrity at VERIZON, and VERIZON told you we would waive all of these fees (as notated in my account) VERIZON will stand by our word.” At that point, I was told I would need to be placed on hold as the charges and fees were large (about $263.00 in service fees and $700.00 in early termination fees) it would take a while for the customer service rep to work with his manager to have these charges removed (and in the case of the ETFs, not post to the account at my next billing cycle). After one hour of sitting on hold, I was again in contact with the customer service rep and told, he and his manager had put in for every single refund and credit, the VERIZON MANAGER had approved all, but one final approval was needed which may take a day or two. AGAIN all of this is notated in the account as to offers and promises made by VERIZON wireless employees and managers, and again I had NEVER asked for a single penny refunded, but was offered. I AGAIN was completely willing to pay for the phones and the ETFs without problem, but was again and again offered such refunds and credits by VERIZON employees.
Wednesday October 9, 2014, because of the continual misinformation I have been given by VERIZON employees, I contacted VERIZON customer service again (call 7, 10/9/2014) to check on the status of the credits and refunds. At that time, I was informed, that many of the credits had been approved, but both ETF fees were denied and would only be refunded if I returned the devices. As frustrated and confused as I was, I calmly explained every single thing that was offered to me again by VERIZON and was confused as to why a MANAGER for VERIZON would offer such things and then they would be denied. The female customer service rep informed me that she was unfamiliar with the situation, would message the male customer service rep and or manager I spoke with on October 7, 2014 and have them reach out to me to explain. I was also told I would hear from them within a “few hours.” This call was placed at about 9:00 a.m., and by 6:00 p.m. I had still not heard anything back from VERIZON. At that time I again called VERIZON customer service (call 8, 10/9/2014) and spoke with another customer service rep. Again for the 8th time explained the entire VERIZON lying situation, and was told that he (VERIZON representative) saw was I had been offered several times (refunds and credits) in the account notations and “too bad, VERIZON does not offer refunds or waivers of ETFs.” At this point in the conversation, without completely cursing out the representative, I asked to speak with his supervisor and was turned over to another supervisor to speak with. Upon speaking with the supervisor, I was informed (for the first time) that although VERIZON WIRELESS employees / MANAGERs had offered me refunds of ETFs, WHICH WAS DOCUMENTED NUMEROUS TIMES BY VERIZON in my account details, VERIZON simply could not waive these fees. I again informed the manager that I didn’t care about the fees and was willing to pay, but I was tired of being LIED TO. At that point in the conversation, I was again apologized to over and over again and as a token of apology from VERIZON, he a VERIZON MANAGER offered me a $70.00 bill credit in order to help with the ETFs. Again, I never once asked for anything, but was offered time and time again from VERIZON EMPLOYEES and MANAGERS. I thanked him for his offer and the call ended.
October 10, 2014 (AGAIN after repeatedly being lied to contacted VERIZON customer service to check on the status of my credits (call 9, 10/10/2014). At that time, I spoke with a female representative and again explained the entire dilemma caused by VERIZON. Again, I was apologized to countless times and was informed that a bill credit for $70.00 was pending as I was informed on the previous night by a VERIZON WIRELESS MANAGER, but she did not have access to see any further details. After again apologizing countless times, the customer service representative seemed to be frustrated that I had been treated so negatively and informed me she was going to address this with her manager. Upon her return to the line, and again without ever asking for one single thing, the VERIZON representative with her VERIZON MANAGER offered to meet “half way” with regards to the lowest ETF fees associated with my accounts and provide a $235.00 bill credit to help me and as a token of “sorry for VERIZON’s screw up and constant lies.” I was also told I would be contacted by her manager within four hours at approximately or before 2:00 p.m. 5:00 p.m. on that same date, after not hearing anything back I again called VERIZON customer service (call 10, 10/10/2014) spoke with another customer service rep and told her the entire story over again. I told the rep I wanted to speak with a manager right at that moment and was placed on the phone with a woman named Linda I believe. Linda informed me that the credit I was previously told I would be given earlier on that date was rejected and I would not be given it. Again without completely going nuts, I calmly explained my complete disgust with VERIZON and the constant lies I was being told. Again after countless apologies from another VERIZON MANAGER, she politely explained to me again the whole VERIZON cannot offer such refunds or credits associated with ETFs and was appalled that anyone in VERIZON would offer such things knowing they could not be given. While working with her, she informed me the best solution to saving money was to cancel my original phone accounts and keep the two new lines that were pending deactivation, which would result in a $250.00 reduced ETF as opposed to a $700.00. I agreed based on her advice without argument and was informed it may take a few hours for the new numbers to be placed back on the IPhones. Two hours later, my phones still not turned on, I contacted VERIZON again. I had also noted that every single bill credit previously applied to my account was back on the account. At this point being as furious as I was, I again called VERIZON WIRELESS (call 11, 10/10/2014) demanded to speak with a MANAGER and was placed on hold. After waiting for an hour on hold (no exaggeration) the customer service representative returned, apologized for everything including the wait time, and placed a male MANAGER on the phone. After explaining the entire three plus week VERIZON lying dilemma, which he was able to see in the account notes where every VERIZON employees acknowledged the misinformation of the previous employee I had spoke with, he again apologized and explained that I did not lose the bill credits, but because two lines had been canceled, the credits were instead applied to my unbilled ETFs, and they would appear on my next bill. He also informed the SIM cards in my devices would still require more time to activate and that they should be turned on by 7:00 a.m. the next day.
While doing research on the SIM issue, I found that VERIZON policy was immediate and SIMs would not require rebooting time to come out of I believe it is called “AG” or “aging” status. Again contacting VERIZON customer service (call 12, 10/10/2014) spoke with a female customer service agent, who actually looking back was the only one not to represent falsehoods or lies, informed me that because the SIM cards were previously associated with cancelled lines, I would need to go to a VERIZON wireless store and get two new SIM cards. At this point in the day it was about 10:00 p.m. and all VERIZON stores were closed for the day. With no choice in the matter, I agreed, and asked just out of curiosity, on the status of the$70.00 bill credit, I was promised on October 9, 2014. At that point the rep informed me that she was able to see that the VERIZON MANAGER had notated and put a credit request in while I was speaking with him, but then immediately cancelled his own request and closed the situation immediately following the completion of our call. I believe at this point in the entire situation I was so fed up this did not surprise me whatsoever so who could I complain to. The very nice customer service representative again apologized for the continued lies I was told and offered me (not a bill credit), but a data GB credit for 12 months (again without me asking for anything). In her own words “I do not want to promise you the world and then lie to you and get your hopes up thinking it will happen as has happened to you numerous times.”    I truly appreciated her honesty and her acknowledgement of the complete disgusting actions by previous VERIZON employees and MANAGERS.
The next day October 11, 2014 I drove with both IPhones to the Verizon big box store, explained the entire story to the employee, was apologized to for a 20 minutes, the manager came out and apologized as well, GREAT CUSTOMER SERVICE! The store is located at 2028 Florence Mall Rd, Space 1139, Florence, KY, (859) 746-3790 (Manager was great so was employee). Never once offered me anything to make up for mistakes VERIZON had made in the past, which I really didn’t care because I never asked nor expected anything, but were truly grateful for my service (I am military and a Federal Law Enforcement Officer) and truly apologized for the actions of the Verizon Sore in Cincinnati Ohio (Again the manager stated the manager at the Cincinnati store lied), and especially apologized for all the lies and mis-information given to me over a three plus week time period.
            Finally, October 15, 2014, I log in to my Verizon wireless account to view my features and reactivate VERIZON’s high definition calling features and see that since September 19, 2014 (original date I purchased the IPhones) I have been charged for Verizon Cloud storage. I HAVE NEVER AGREED TO THESE SERVICES, NEVER REQUESTED THESE SERVICES, NEVER EVEN NEW THEY WERE THERE!!!! Again had to call VERIZON for the fraud and lies they are perpetrating on a daily basis, COMPLAIN to another customer service rep (call 13 10/15/2014) in order to get the fraudulent charges removed from my bill.
Conclusion
            Here I sit writing this long complaint that no one in VERIZON will ever be held accountable for, no one will answer for the lies, mis-information, and disrespect employees and VERIZON MANAGERS perpetrate even though each lie was documented by VERIZON in account notations, and no one will be accountable for the lies the retail stores tell in order to increase their QUOTA to activate a certain amount of new lines per month. I am utterly disgusted with the treatment I have received, will be requesting these notations (if they have not been deleted from my account), have documented each conversation, and recorded many of the conversations, with an end result of pretty much nothing. VERIZON does not care about their customers and could probably care less about my terrible experience. While there are several other cellular options available, they are all crooks and liars just as the perfect documented examples of VERIZON employees and management lying in this case.
Christopher

    Giogetz,
Thank you for taking the time to share your experience. I am shocked by the many representatives that you had to speak to regarding your first request. This situation should have never gotten to be complicated and resulting in multiple calls from you. I apologize on behalf of those representatives for dropping the ball. I do agree that the representatives do need to be held accountable and I would like to submit feedback for those that you worked with. I have sent you a direct message. Please reply to the direct message so I can begin submitting feedback.
AndreaS_VZW
Follow us on Twitter @VZWSupport

Employee and Group responsible being overwitten when clicking "Change".

Hi All,
I have searched the forums for a solution to a problem I have had but did not get the bottom of it.
I have done some debugging and managed to sort it and thought I'd share my findings with you.
Problem:
You are in the Web interaction centre (CRM 5.0 in my case) and you navigate to a previously saved activity.
You click the "Change" button and the Employee Responsible and the Group Responsible are changed to the ones for the currently logged on user.
You want to stop this happenning. In our case we have a call centre who amend activities and we do not want the details for employee and group changing.
Solution:
Go to SE18.
Open BADI CRM_IC_INBOX_BADI.
Go to an active implementation or create a new one.
go to method DETERMINE_GROUP_RESPONSIBLE
Add the following line of code to the method:
C_SKIP_DEFAULT_LOGIC = 'X'.
Hope this helps someone.
Many thanks
Gary Hawkins

Thank You Gary. Appreciate it.
Best Regards,
Masood Imrani S.

HR LDB PNP and customer infotypes in 640

Hello,
I encountered the following problem during an upgrade from 4.6C to SAP ERP Central Component 5.0. When using logical database PNP and customer infotypes the syntax check produces the following syntax error:
- INCLUDE report "%_HR9731" not found
I have added an example program below. Prerequisite for this program is that the cutomer infotype 9731 exists in the system.
Has anyone experienced this problem before? And if so, is there a solution? I can program some workarounds, but I prefer a solution, which does not involve changing my code.
Regards,
Marcel
REPORT ZTESTINFOTYPES.
tables: pernr.
infotypes: 0000,
0001,
0002,
9731 mode n.
start-of-selection.
get pernr.
write / p0002-pernr.
end-of-selection.

Hi all,
"You will have to run report RPUMS40CCI (XPRA for generation of
infotype include) for existing customer-defined infotypes.
If you have not run this report then please do so.
The report RPU40CCI creates the infotype include %_HRnnnn (nnnn =
infotype number) and the additional data structure Pnnnn_AF (nnnn =
infotype number) for the given infotype, provided that the correspondin parameter ("generate infotype include" or "generate additional data
structure") are set on the selection screen. If the parameter "maintain only T77ID" is set, no infotype include or additional data structure is maintained, only those entered in table T77ID."
Best Regards
Silvio Galery

Can we show total enrolled employee and employee no field as well

guys
we are using oracle Learning Administrator 11.5.10,i have two query for enrollment screen in self service page,one is regarding total count show of enrolled employee ,because we have to count manually no of participant instead of automate,and 2nd one is ,we need to show to employee no field as well,right now we can't understand by name becuase in same case may appear name duplicate,
please help this regard.. thanks for supporting.

Thanks for your reply and supporting..
When we go in class detail ,where we can see information about the class like tile ,calass location etc,at the left sied of top there are four option link which are,
Clasee
Enrollments
Resource Booking
Learner Access
But when we click to entrollment link system display all enrolled employee those who pertain that class,after appearing enrollment page ,there is not field(Total enrolled employee) and we have to count manually. How can we display total filed at the bottom.
second query is,we need to display employee no field as well,is there any possibility,
hope you understand...
Thanks.

Technical Link b/w Employee and Appraisal Template

Hi,
Can anybody please help me in finding the technical link b/w an Employee and an Appraisal Template? In other words, I need to know the table name(s) in which data is stored while appraisal processed is going on. I can view the appraisal form in IT0024 and IT0025 in PA. I can also see the objects VA, VB & VC in PP01, but where are these entries stored in the table.
We are on SAP R/3 4.7 (Enterprise) and using new Objective Setting and Appraisal Component.
Thanks
Vikas Bhatia

Hi there,
Function module 'HRHAP_DOCUMENT_GET_LIST' can be used for this purpose.
In order to find the objects you want, make sure you set the appraisal templates for calling this function as well as all of the other required parameters. If you need help for the other parameters then let me know.
The fields for the template table import parameter need to be set as follows:
plvar = Active plan version
otype = VA or VB or VC
objid = appraisal template id
This returns two tables - the appraisals and the associated documents.
Other tables you may be interested in are :
HRHAP_T
HRHAP
HRHAP_APPER
HRHAP_APPEE
Hope this helps you out. Any questions, let me know.
If this works, please award the points for this advice.
Cheers
Colin.

Setup needed for ACH payments to the Employee and Supplier

Hi,
I am looking for a document to know the setup steps needed for ACH payment to the Employees and the Suppliers. Can anybody give me a detailed document on that or let me know where I will find one?
Thanks,
Arun
Edited by: 834011 on Feb 4, 2011 3:55 PM

hi
I am working on 11i to R12 upgrade project.
All I have is SQL and flatfile from 11.5.10 instance..I need to implement ACH in R12...
How this flatfile is created in R12
Do I need to create a Etext RTF template in R12? My bank is wellsfargo
I need to create and implement ACH/credit/debit format in R12 environment.
whate are the steps to create a bank accepting flat file in R12
Can you please tell me how should create the flat file in r12? Should i create etext template or
XML RTF template..
appreciate your reply
kp

Employee and applicant infotype

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for