Empty Aggregation Level - Need user to put in entries when none exist

Hi, I have an aggregation level for Version, Material Family, and a Key Figure.  The Cube has no data planned at this level when the user 1st starts to work with their version. 
I am trying to find a way to get the user to be able to input a Key Figure Value for some Material Families.
I would either like the users to see a list of Material Families and input the Key Figure Next to the Material Family
or
I would like the user to input a Material Familly and the associated Key Figure for each family value they have.  Thus creating entries for the Material Family Values they would like to run a planning function on.
I have been able to create a query that shows a list of Material Families and an input enabled Key Figure Field.  When I put the value in and Save the Value gets saved to "Unassigned" Material Family even though I put the Key Figure Value next to a displayed Material Family.
I have also been able to create a query that does not show the Families but has an input record.  The same thing seems to happen.  I input a family value and key figure value, save, and it gets saved to "Unassigned".
I have tried working with Characteristic Relationships, but it doesn seem to work when I'm just working with 1 characteristic like Material Family.  Here's an example of my issue:  Link:[http://i27.tinypic.com/n1a1wn.png|http://i27.tinypic.com/n1a1wn.png]
Am I going about this in the right Way
Is there a way to have the user add data where there is none?
It seems I have such a simple scenario.

Hi, Thanks for following up.  I simply need to have users input the Key Figure Values for a single "Family" Characteristic.  I am simply trying to create "Family" Records for which no planning data exists and it is totally eluding me.  The Aggregation Level only has Family, Version, InfoProvider.  Version and InfoProvider are in the filter. 
I have successfully created an input enabled query and also added a input line at the bottom.  If I input input a value next to a Family or if I input a new family and save the data the values just end up in the unassigned family.   To get the families to show up in the query I have the Family Characteristic Advance settings (in query settings) set to Master Data
Please take a look at the below link for an example.
Please let me know what I have to do so users or myself can create Family records in my aggregation level!
Link: [http://i25.tinypic.com/1qmz5w.png|http://i25.tinypic.com/1qmz5w.png]

Similar Messages

  • Need user name in header data when posting f-65

    Hi all,
    I had a problem while posting accounting Document through Workflow. Whever i am posting the document manually my user name is entered in the header data of posted document. But whenever i am posting it through workflow i am getting the entered username as wf-batch. But i want the user name of the user who excuted the work item.
    please let me know ASAP.
    Thanks
    chandu

    This is a very common issue. The user name is the name of the user who actually put the record in the database which is WF-BATCH in case of workflow. You can then find out the time the record was created and look for the actual user in the workflow log (transaction SWI1). If you still want the actual user, I'm afraid that you'll need to create a custom field and enhance your workflow.

  • Aggregation level and planning filter question

    Hi,
    I have below questions on aggregation levels and planning fitlers.
    Scenario: An Aggregation level is built on a multiprovider( Actual Cub1(5 chars, 4 keyfig), Actual Cube2(8 chars, 6 key fig), and Real Time Cube3(8 chars and 3 keyfig)). A FOX copy function has to be built on this aggregation level in which data from cube1 will be copied to cube 3.
    1. Does an Aggregation level need to have all chars and keyfigures from cube 1 and cube 3? or it should have structure of Cube 3 only as data will be written to cube 3?
    - what are the standard design considerations for defining aggregation level?
    2. In planning filter, both cube1 and cube3 are to be restricted or only cube3?
    Is it necessary that only target planning cube is to be resricted? In that case how function will get the source data from cube1?
    - what are the standard design considerations for defining planning filter?
    Please provide some info on this...
    any document on design consderations for planning object will be great.
    Thanks,
    Pundari.

    Please go thru the following link u will find step by step procedure for IP:
    http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/e0568315-7727-2d10-d4ba-88ab69e16577?quicklink=index&overridelayout=true
    Please provide ur valuable points if it is helpful:)
    Regards,
    Prasad.

  • Need user exit to put filter on field ( customer item due by ) in F110

    i'm having the requirement to put filter on the transation f110 on the paramater tab  of customer item due date that shoud consider  only 10 days back date form the sy-datum .  so i need user exit to pace the logic in automatic payment transaction.
    Thanks
    sarfraz

    Hi used the BET for process 1820 copied the function module and configure it and i have put the break point but when i have process the transaction f110 its not triggering.
    i have done as the below config
    In FIBF Tcode, Products -> of Customer for BTE 1820 : created a ZZ<Product> and made Active
    In Process Modules-> of Customer for BTE 00001820 : added ZZ<Function Module> and ZZ<Product>

  • Customer Exit in query on aggregation level

    Hi,
    I try to have variables filled with a customer exit.
    The coding of the customer exit is correct, this have been tested in queries on multiproviders.
    Unfortunately it is not working when these variables are used on level of aggregation levels.
    What I would like to achieve:
    We have some planning queries on aggregation levels. Different users can plan on the same query (and aggregation level), but not for the same set of data. Therefore the query should be restricted to the authorized values. Unfortunately we can not switch to the new authorization concept (analysis authorizations) yet, but we already need this functionality very soon.
    The customer exits are the only possible option. Unfortunately it seems that the customer exits are not being executed when the variables are used in queries on aggregation levels.
    The variables are not ready for input and should be filled in I_STEP = 2
    Is this normal? If so, is there a work around?
    Thanks in advance for quick replies!
    Kind regards,
    Bart

    Hi,
    You can debug your query by putting the break-point in your exit code and execute the query in RSRT. This way you will be able to find if your customer exit is actually being called or not. If it is being called then there can be some logical problem with your code due to which the variable values are not getting populated.
    Regards,
    Deepti

  • How data update when there is two planning cubes in one aggregation level

    If we have two planning cubes and a multi-cube includes these two planning cubes.
    then we have the aggregation level defined based on this multi-cube.
    if the characteristics and key figures defined in aggregation level all are included in these two planning cubes. When we plan the data with plan query based on this aggregation level, which plan cube will be updated with plan data, or both of them?

    HI Wang,
    yes as Bindu said you need to restrict the layout based on the infoprovider.
    Lets assume that we have a multi provider M1 and it has two planning cubes cube1 and cube1.
    in case u develop a layout for updating cube 1 give the restriction in the filter section as infoprovider = cube1.
    or the vice versa.
    Else ur layout must input values for both the cubes simultaneously, then in that case create two restricted KF with each having a restriction for cube1 and cube 2.
    so wen the user enters value for the first restricted KF it will get saved in cube1 and wen he enters value for the second  restricted KF it will gets saved in cube2.
    This is how it works. Guess this was useful to u.
    Regards.
    Shafi.

  • Aggregation Level in not prepared to run on HANA

    Hello Experts,
    I've the following system configuration:
    CPMBPC 810: SP 0001
    POASBC 100_731: SP 0005
    HANABPC 810: SP 0001
    Hence we've PAK and BPC license too for working with PAK.
    Now, I've created an Aggregation level: ZTPM_AG01 on top of a Multiprovider which encompasses 2 real time and 1 standard cube. By default all three are HANA Optimized.
    Then why I'm getting a red traffic light for both the  aggregation level 'ZTPM_AG01' as well as the MultiProvider as shown below:
    I've gone through below link:
    How to Check whether a Planning Function or a Disaggregation in PAK is executed in Memory
    and noted that we were in alignment for the most of the below points except the one in bold:
    Is note 1637148 implemented?
    Is the system switched to PAK (see note 1637199)?
    Is the InfoCube HANA optimized?
    Is the InfoCube/DataStore Object entered in the list of HANA optimized InfoCubes?
    Is a characteristic relationship type exit or type hierarchy used in the InfoProvider?
    Is a data slice type Exit used in the InfoProvider?
    Is any virtual object used (virtual InfoCube, master data with own read class etc.)?
    Is a key figure type TIMS or DATS used (input enabled)?
    Is the user parameter RSPLS_HDB_SUPPORT set to ‘HDB_ON’ (if necessary, see note 1637199)?
    Global emergency exit switch is not set using report SAP_RSADMIN_MAINTAIN with parameter object RSPLS_HDB_PROCESSING_OFF with blank or empty value.
    I've made user parameters RSPLS_HDB_SUPPORT to HDB_ON.
    Can you please let me know, what am I missing here ?
    Thanks & regards,
    Jomy

    Dear DonB evis!
    I had exactly the same problem with lightroom as you:
    "C:\Program Files\Adobe Photoshop Lightroom\lightroom.exe
    This application has failed to start because the application configuration is incorrect. Reinstalling the application may fix this problem."
    Event log indicates, that "Component identity found in manifest [inside Lightroom - Microsoft.VC80.MFC.MANIFEST] does not match the identity of the component requested".
    The theory is that files called manifests tell the system loader that application X (here: lightroom.exe) depend on assembly Y (Microsoft.VC80.MFC). This very CRT assembly is a shared one, and it resides in C:\Windows\WinSxS\.
    SO this is a problem of your Windows not Lightroom, which refers to windows shared element which cannot be found (due to .NET installation and policies mess).
    Side by side assemblies use publisher configuration files (POLICIES) to globally redirect applications and assemblies from using one version of a side-by-side assembly to another version of the same assembly.
    There is a problem on certain machines caused by Windows SP1 to .NET 2.0 which causes problems messing with policies and redirecting applications from using proper shared assemblies.
    After installing SP1 (which installs with Windows Update) to .NET 2.0 on those machines it was impossible to reinstall .NET unless you delete the policies inside the C:\Windows\WinSxS\Policies\ folder (I do not know exactly why, but it was my case and several other people too).
    In my previous post I described you the process I did two days ago on my system (WinXP Pro with SP2) and after that lightroom start to run.
    I am sorry you are experiencing such difficulties, but I would not post my way of solving the problem if I did not test it successfully on my system.
    Hope you manage to solve it.
    Best regards.

  • Aggregation level - design  question

    Hi, All
    we are in BI-IP ( Netweaver 2004s SPS16).
    I have a design question for this scenario.
    User needs to plan the amounts for a duration (start period and end period), Jan2008 -Dec2008 (001.2008, 012.2008) = 12000.
    We need to distribute this to the periods equally. 001.2008 = 1000, 002.2008 =1000 .... 012.2008=1000.
    If the user changes the period amounts, it should be reflected back in the duration amount.
    Pl suggest the design for the aggregation levels to achieve this.
    Thanks in advance.
    velu

    Hello Velu,
    As the name also goes, creating an "aggregation level" will only result in "aggregation". What your requirement is, is called disaggregation or distribution - this cannot happen automatically - you will either have to use the feature in input queries or use the distribution planning function or create your own planning function using fox/exit.

  • DP Disaggregation and Aggregation levels

    Hi all,
    I have a question regarding disaggregation and aggregation levels.
    KFu2019s and disaggregation setup:
    KF001:
    Calculation type: I (not relevant)
    Disag. Key Fig.: KF000 (not relevant)
    Time-Based Disaggregation: K (not relevant)
    Time-Based Disag. Key Figure: (not relevant)
    KF002:
    Calculation type: I
    Disag. Key Fig.: Keyfigure001
    Time-Based Disaggregation: P
    We are now interested on the KF002. KF002u2019s disaggregation is based on KF001. I am trying to copy KF001 values to KF002 with a macro that is attached to a background job. Macro doesnu2019t do anything else than copy values from KF001 to KF002.
    Background job setup:
    Selection:
    Sales organization: 2000AB
    Location: 1000EF
    Product: 1 to 2000 (consists 2000 products, including products that do not belong to above location)
    Excluded values:
    Customer group 1: 2500AB
    Aggregation level:
    Sales organization
    Location
    Product
    Customer group 1
    What I try to accomplish (through background job - mass processing):
    I am trying to copy values with above setup so that the most detailed level which is Customer group 2 would have values through disaggregation. I have successfully copied values to product level, location level, sales organization level but the customer group 2 level values are not as KF001u2019s. Values are right in the SUM level, but not disaggregated right to customer group 2 level.
    I get right results when I choose Customer group 2 to the aggregation level but this is not something we can do as it causes way too long runtimes. What I am also interested in is that how come the disaggregation does not work properly or does it? How can I get the disaggregation work so that I only have to select the aggregation levels which are defined in the selection and get proper results through disaggregation to customer group 2 level?
    Thanks in advance,
    Juha

    Hello Juha,
    You do not need another macro, just make the above change to your original one, and the macro should work.
    Your aggregation level in the job should also be OK.
    Since you mentioned that the values at detailed level are not the same as key figure 1, it sounds to me that the system did a pro rata disaggregation. Do you have the key figure 2 totally cleared out before copy? Since you're using disaggregation type 'I', it only disaggregates based on another key figure when the key figure value is initial.
    So my suggestion is, you can try to change the key figure's disaggregation tyep to 'P' and check if the macro works.
    Or if you have to use type 'I', you should add a step in the macro before the copy step, to initialize key figure 2 first.
    To initialize a key figure, just put the row in the step, and for the 'Change Mode', select 'Initialization'.
    Best Regards,
    Ada

  • Access on aggregated levels with virtual key figures

    Hi all,
    I need access to the aggregated view of a BEx report within user-exit RSR00002 for processing virtual key figures. Currently I only get access to the lowest non-aggregated level.
    My requirements in detail:
    I get certain key-figures (250 historical values)on the lowest aggregation level - so-called folders. Then I have to aggregate this vector of values at the next hierarchy level up to the top-level, say along-side a company's business department structure. Drill-down, slice&dice should be possible. So far so good - this is done easily with standard BEx features.
    Then, on each aggregation level, i.e. hierarchy node, I need to get the third lowest of the 250 aggregated values to assign this to my vkf. This is not an issue of the algorithm but of the internal data representation or access to the OLAP processor because I don't get this vector on the same aggregated level such as I could see it in my BEx report but on the lowest non-aggregated folder level.
    The question is now:
    a. Is data access on aggregated levels and drill-downs because of the internal representation generally not possible within this user-exit and would I have to supply the aggragation logic myself or
    b. do I have overlooked something critical - did I miss the trick?
    Every idea or hint is deeply welcome!!
    Thanks a lot,
    Michael
    Message was edited by: Michael Kronenberger

    First check in <b>Technical Information</b> in <b>RSRT</b> , whether the
    <b>Virtual Char/Key</b> Fig is<b> Y</b> or <b>N</b>.

  • How to do Invoice Automation ( Converted PDF needs to be put in DMS)

    Hi All,
    i do have one requirement for Invoice Automation.
    i need to develop the report to do invoice Automation.
    the logic - first we need to run the tcode - VF31.
    after the Printing of invoice i need to convert into PDF, then converted PDF need to be put into DMS.
    i am not getting how to take forward .
    kindly can u help me.
    Thanks,
    Manjunath

    The attached form will help you in understanding the dynamic calculations.
    Reading the table data with changes in the future..
    a) If your application is a standalone application, (means you distribute the .PDF file directly to the users instead of rendering the PDF based on request), then you may need to hard code the data inside the form itself. - In this case, if the table data changes, you need to change the PDF and re-distribute the form.
    b) If you are rendering the PDF on the fly based on the request, then you have the option of reading the data from the table (you need to do this in the parent application which is invoking the rendering process) and make it part of the input XML at the time of rendering. You need to write your code to read the XML and do the calculations for each request. - In this case, if the table data changes, PDF will get the latest information beacause the latest info is available in the input XML.
    Thanks
    Srini

  • Aggregation level doesnt support non-cumulative kf

    hello
    IP planer generates an error "Infoobject 0AMOUNT (version A) is not compunded" when I include non-cumulative kf into aggregation level of infoprovider.
    KF ZAMOUNT is non-cumulative and depends on 0AMOUNT. Both kf are active.
    I need non-cumulative kf just for informative purposes, i dont want to plan with this kf.
    Does anyone know is it possible to use non-cumulative kf in aggregation level of multicube?

    Hi,
    no non-kumulative key figures are not supported in aggregation levels.
    But one can use a MultiProvider on the cube with the non-cumulative key figure. Create an aggregation level for the objects you want to plan and use this aggregation level also in the MultiProvider. Then you can integrate the 'plan objects' and the non-cumulative key figure in a query defined on the MultiProvider.
    Regards,
    Gregor

  • Need User Exists

    Hello Friends,
    i need User Exists for PR,PO,MIGO,MIRO Creation transactions , i need to save data in one Custom table for all these transactions. so that i can details for purchase life cycle from refering the single table . i donot require to refer all other tables.
    similar way for SD Transactions ,,
    if any of you came across these type of  reqirement, just guide me
    Thanks and Regards
    Kumar M

    Hi,
    Migo User exits:
    Enhancement/ Business Add-in            Description                                                                               
    Enhancement                                                                               
    MB_CF001                                Customer Function Exit in the Case of Updating a Art. Doc.     
    MBCF0011                                Read from RESB and RKPF for print list in  MB26                
    MBCF0010                                Customer exit: Create reservation BAPI_RESERVATION_CREATE1     
    MBCF0009                                Filling the storage location field                             
    MBCF0007                                Customer function exit: Updating a reservation                 
    MBCF0006                                Customer function for WBS element                              
    MBCF0005                                Article document item for goods receipt/issue slip             
    MBCF0002                                Customer function exit: Segment text in article doc. item                                                                               
    Business Add-in                                                                               
    MB_RESERVATION_BADI                     MB21/MB22: Check and Complete Dialog Data                      
    MB_QUAN_CHECK_BADI                      BAdI: Item Data at Time of Quantity Check                      
    MB_PHYSINV_INTERNAL                     Connection: Core Inventory and Retail AddOn                    
    MB_MIGO_ITEM_BADI                       BAdI in MIGO for Changing Item Data                            
    MB_MIGO_BADI                            BAdI in MIGO for External Detail Subscreens                    
    MB_DOC_BADI_INTERNAL                    BAdIs when Creating an Article Document (SAP Internal)         
    MB_DOCUMENT_UPDATE                      BADI when updating article document: MSEG and MKPF             
    MB_DOCUMENT_BADI                        BAdIs when Creating an Article Document                        
    MB_CIN_MM07MFB7_QTY                     Proposal of quantity from Excise invoice in GR                 
    MB_CIN_MM07MFB7                         BAdI for India Version exit in include MM07MFB7                
    MB_CIN_LMBMBU04                         posting of gr                                                  
    MB_CHECK_LINE_BADI                      BAdI: Check Line Before Copying to the Blocking Tables         
    ARC_MM_MATBEL_WRITE                     Check Add-On-Specific Data for MM_MATBEL                       
    ARC_MM_MATBEL_CHECK                     Check Add-On-Specific Criteria for MM_MATBEL       
    Miro userexits:
    Enhancement/ Business Add-in            Description                                                                               
    Enhancement                                                                               
    LMR1M001                                User exits in Logistics Invoice Verification                    
    LMR1M002                                Account grouping for GR/IR account maintenance                  
    LMR1M003                                Number assignment in Logistics Invoice Verification             
    LMR1M004                                Logistics Invoice Verification: item text for follow-on docs    
    LMR1M005                                Logistics Inv. Verification: Release Parked Doc. for Posting    
    LMR1M006                                Logistics Invoice Verification: Process XML Invoice             
    MRMH0001                                Logistics Invoice Verification: ERS procedure                   
    MRMH0002                                Logistics Invoice Verification: EDI inbound                     
    MRMH0003                                Logistics Invoice Verification: Revaluation/RAP                 
    MRMN0001                                Message output and creation: Logistics Invoice Verification                                                                               
    Business Add-in                                                                               
    INVOICE_UPDATE                          Business Add-In: Logistics Invoice Verification                                                                               
    PO userexits:
    Enhancement/ Business Add-in            Description                                                                               
    Enhancement                                                                               
    MEQUERY1                                Enhancement to Document Overview ME21N/ME51N                   
    MEVME001                                WE default quantity calc. and over/ underdelivery tolerance    
    MM06E001                                User exits for EDI inbound and outbound purchasing documents   
    MM06E003                                Number range and document number                               
    MM06E004                                Control import data screens in purchase order                  
    MM06E005                                Customer fields in purchasing document                         
    MM06E007                                Change document for requisitions upon conversion into PO       
    MM06E008                                Monitoring of contr. target value in case of release orders    
    MM06E009                                Relevant texts for "Texts exist" indicator                     
    MM06E010                                Field selection for vendor address                             
    MMAL0001                                ALE source list distribution: Outbound processing              
    MMAL0002                                ALE source list distribution: Inbound processing               
    MMAL0003                                ALE purcasing info record distribution: Outbound processing    
    MMAL0004                                ALE purchasing info record distribution: Inbound processing    
    MMDA0001                                Default delivery addresses                                     
    MMFAB001                                User exit for generation of release order                      
    MRFLB001                                Control Items for Contract Release Order                       
    MELAB001                                Gen. forecast delivery schedules: Transfer schedule implem.    
    AMPL0001                                User subscreen for additional data on AMPL                     
    LMEDR001                                Enhancements to print program                                  
    LMELA002                                Adopt batch no. from shipping notification when posting a GR   
    LMELA010                                Inbound shipping notification: Transfer item data from IDOC    
    LMEQR001                                User exit for source determination                             
    LMEXF001                                Conditions in Purchasing Documents Without Invoice Receipt     
    LWSUS001                                Customer-Specific Source Determination in Retail               
    M06B0001                                Role determination for purchase requisition release                                                                               
    M06B0002                                Changes to comm. structure for purchase requisition release    
    MEFLD004                                Determine earliest delivery date f. check w. GR (only PO)      
    MEETA001                                Define schedule line type (backlog, immed. req., preview)      
    ME590001                                Grouping of requsitions for PO split in ME59                   
    M06E0005                                Role determination for release of purchasing documents         
    M06E0004                                Changes to communication structure for release purch. doc.     
    M06B0005                                Changes to comm. structure for overall release of requisn.     
    M06B0004                                Number range and document number                               
    M06B0003                                Number range and document number                                                                               
    Business Add-in                                                                               
    ME_PROCESS_PO                           Enhancements for Processing Enjoy Purchase Order: Intern.      
    ME_PROCESS_COMP                         Processing of Component Default Data at Time of GR: Customer   
    ME_PO_SC_SRV                            BAdI: Service Tab Page for Subcontracting                      
    ME_MMPUR_EINM_CUST                      BAdI Methods for Processing IDoc Data in the SUS Scenario      
    ME_MMPUR_EINM                           BAdI Methods for Processing IDoc Data in the SUS Scenario      
    ME_HOLD_PO                              Hold Enjoy Purchase Orders: Activation/Deactivation            
    ME_GUI_PO_CUST                          Customer's Own Screens in Enjoy Purchase Order                 
    ME_FIELDSTATUS_STOCK                    FM Account Assignment Behavior for Stock PR/PO                 
    ME_DEFINE_CALCTYPE                      Control of Pricing Type: Additional Fields                     
    ME_COMMTMNT_REQ_RE_C                    Check of Commitment Relevance of Purchase Requisitions         
    ME_COMMTMNT_REQ_RELE                    Check of Commitment Relevance of Purchase Requisitions         
    ME_COMMTMNT_PO_REL_C                    Check for Commitment-Relevance of Purchase Orders              
    ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST                      Enhancements for Processing Enjoy Purchase Order: Customer     
    EXTENSION_US_TAXES                      Extended Tax Calculation with Additional Data                  
    MM_EDI_ORDERS_OUT                       Enhancements for IDoc Output of Purchase Order: Internal       
    MM_EDI_DESADV_IN                        Supplementation of Delivery Interface from Purchase Order      
    MM_EDI_DELFOR_OUT                       Enhancements for IDoc Output of SA Releases: Internal          
    ME_TRIGGER_ATP                          Triggers New ATP for Changes in EKKO, EKPO, EKPV               
    ME_TAX_FROM_ADDRESS                     Tax jurisdiction code taken from address                       
    ME_REQ_POSTED                           Purchase Requisition Posted                                    
    ME_REQ_OI_EXT                           Commitment Update in the Case of External Requisitions                                                                               
    ME_PURCHDOC_POSTED                      Purchasing Document Posted1                                    
    ME_PROCESS_REQ_CUST                     Enhancements for Processing Enjoy PReqs: Customer              
    ME_PROCESS_REQ                          Enhancements for Processing Enjoy PReqs: Internal              
    ME_COMMTMNT_PO_RELEV                    Check for Commitment-Relevance of Purchase Orders              
    ME_BSART_DET                            Change document type for automatically generated POs           
    ME_BAPI_PR_IBS                          BAdI: Enjoy BAPIs for Purchase Requisitions                    
    ME_BAPI_PR_CUST                         Customer BAdI for Enjoy Purchase Requisition BAPIs             
    ME_BAPI_PR_CREATE_02                                                                               
    ME_BAPI_PR_CREATE_01                                                                               
    ME_BAPI_PO_IBS                          BAdI for Inbound/Outbound Mapping BAPI_PO_CREATE1 IBS          
    ME_BAPI_PO_CUST                         Customer BAdI for BAPI_PO_CREATE1 and BAPI_PO_CHANGE           
    ME_BAPI_PO_CREATE_02                                                                               
    ME_BAPI_PO_CREATE_01                                                                               
    ME_ACTV_CANCEL_PO                       BAdI for Activating the Cancel Function at Header Level        
    MEGUI_LAYOUT                            BAdI for Enjoy Purchasing GUI                                  
    SMOD_MRFLB001                           Control Items for Contract Release Order                       
    ME_CCP_ACTIVE_CHECK                     BAdI to check whether CCP process is active                    
    ME_COMMITMENT_STO_CH                    BadI for checking if commitments for STOs are active           
    ME_CIP_REF_CHAR                         Facilitates Reference Characteristics in Purchasing            
    ME_CIP_ALLOW_CHANGE                     Configuration in Purchasing: Changeability Control             
    ME_CIN_MM06EFKO                         Copy PO data for use by Country version India                  
    ME_CIN_LEINRF2V                         BADI for LEINRF03 excise_invoice_details                       
    ME_CIN_LEINRF2R                         BADI for CIN India - Delivery charges                          
    ME_CHECK_SOURCES                        Additional Checks in Source Determination/Checking             
    ME_CHECK_ALL_ITEMS                      Run Through Items Again in the Event of Changes in EKKO        
    ME_CHANGE_OUTTAB                        Enrich ALV Output Table in Purchasing                          
    ME_CHANGE_CHARACTER                     Customer-Specific Characteristics for Product Allocation       
    ME_CCP_DEL_DURATION                     Calc. of Delivery Duration in CCP Process (Not in Standard)    
    ME_CCP_BESWK_AUTH_CH                    BAdI for authorization checks for procuring site                                                                               
    If these helpful rewards points
    Regards
    Pratap.M

  • Planning level to be added in aggregation level

    Hi,
    Currently my aggregation level has the following elements:
    1. Plant
    2. Sales Group
    3. Cutomer
    Now I need to change from Plant to Customer Plant. Following are my queries on the same:
    1. Can I add customer plant in addition to plant in the aggregation level?
    2. Hence forth I would be doing planning on customer plant level, will that be an issue?
    3. Will there be any issue with the historical data already planned at plant level?
    Kindly help me with the above issue.
    Regards,
    Bhushan

    Hi Bhushan,
    1. You can add freely your additional characteristic and your model will technically keep on working ,of course you will need to adjust the filters and functions to the new aggregation level of data
    2. Again you will need to adjust your business logic in all components of the aggregation level (filters ,functions)
    3.Historical data is apearing currently under Customer Plant = '#' ,you should consider reposting historical data in order to align current with historical data
    Regards,
    Eitan.

  • Aggregation level includes filter objects...

    Hi,
    We are using a BO universe on top of a BEX query to create WebI reports.
    We now run into the following problem when filtering on a certain characteristic in the BO query.
    The result set of rows is limited to the correct values, but not aggregated up to the requested aggregation level. The problem exists whether the key figure is defined as having an aggregation to be database delegated or sum.
    In the query results we see the number of rows being pulled back is too high, the results displayed are correct (because aggregated by WebI). In the example below we selected three stores, but not store as a result object.
    *** Query Name:Query 1 ***
    ** Query Properties:
    Universe:Retail Sales and Stock
    Last Refresh Date:9/2/10 2:29 PM
    Last Execution Duration: 33
    Number of rows: 4,947
    Retrieve Duplicate Row: ON
    ** Query Definition:
    Result Objects: Style Code, NSLS @ PCS
    Filters ( Only RMS Billing Documents Infoprovider
    AND Given Legacy Division Set
    AND Given Currency Conversion Type
    AND Store Key In List { 1001; 1002; 1003 }
    AND NSLS @ PCS Not Equal 0
    We cannot attach a document, but the actual amount of rows should have been 2,856,
    the number of different style in these 3 stores.
    When we include the store object in the results, we can see the number of rows stays the same (proof that it did indeed return rows on a store level and not aggregated upt to the style code...
    *** Query Name:Query 1 ***
    ** Query Properties:
    Universe:Retail Sales and Stock
    Last Refresh Date:9/2/10 2:09 PM
    Last Execution Duration: 13
    Number of rows: 4,947
    Retrieve Duplicate Row: ON
    ** Query Definition:
    Result Objects: Style Code, Store Key, NSLS @ PCS
    Filters ( Only RMS Billing Documents Infoprovider
    AND Given Legacy Division Set
    AND Given Currency Conversion Type
    AND Store Key In List { 1001; 1002; 1003 }
    AND NSLS @ PCS Not Equal 0
    Is this behaviour fixed in any fix pack? Or did noone address this problem?
    The problem becomes a real problem when the user wants to select everything u/i a certain date.
    The number of rows are then pulled back on a style/store/day combination and easily reached 100.000 rows.
    Thanks for any insight you can give on this,
    Marianne

    Hi Rik,
    Thanks for at least trying
    I didn't try this before, so I just did, despite the fact that the aggregation level only has something to do with the way data aggregates within webi. (I'm that desperate)
    No difference, other then the fact that I now get #MULTIVALUE in the cells with multiple underlying rows.
    Anyone else?
    Marianne

Maybe you are looking for