Empty files are getting created at receiver FTP server

Hi Experts,
I have an Idoc to File scenario where I am sending an XML file to receiver FTP server.
Scenario is working fine but sometimes an empty file is getting generated at receiver FTP server.
I have already selected ignore empty file at receiver channel so issue is not within PI system configuration.
When I checked the message log I can see that almost all the files are getting created successfully without any issues, but
for some files/messages I can see that there are below error logs.
"Transmitting the message to endpoint <local> using connection IDoc_AAE_http://sap.com/xi/XI/System failed, due to: com.sap.engine.interfaces.messaging.api.exception.MessagingException: Could not get FTP connection from connection pool (1 connections) within 5,000 milliseconds; increase the number of available connections"
"Exception caught by adapter framework: Could not get FTP connection from connection pool (1 connections) within 5,000 milliseconds; increase the number of available connections."
And after there is again success message log in the same message and it creating a file successfully during that time stamp.
but the third party is sometime receiving empty file which I am not able to find in any trace or log (my file name is SD_timestamp.xml).
Can you please let me know what is the solution and what adjustments FTP server need to do in order to resolve this issue.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Rahul Kulkarni

The error you are getting that says "Could not get FTP connection from connection pool (1 connections) within 5,000 milliseconds; increase the number of available connections" has probably nothing to do with the empty files problem.
I second Hareesh Gampa that you first should try "temporary file creation". You might also need to tell the FTP owner that he should only pick up files with that are written completely and that do comply with a negotiated file name schema. The temp file should have another schema of course then. He should not pick up just every file that is written. See here for details
http://help.sap.de/saphelp_nw74/helpdata/en/44/6830e67f2a6d12e10000000a1553f6/content.htm
HTH
Cheers
Jens

Similar Messages

EREC: Multipal IDOC are getting created in receiver system for one IDOC

Hello Experts,
I ran in to one wearied issue in IDOC creation in Receiver system. I am running PFAL in sender system for only Person but 10 IDOC are getting created in receiver system. I don't know why is this happening.
This issue started popping up after we ran RBDAPP01-Inbound Processing of IDocs Ready for Transfer. We ran this to change IDOC to 53 status. Now I don't know what went wrong but Perner distribution is behaving
Appreciate your help.
Regards,
Krishna Bidwai
Losangeles USA.
818 527 0204.

Yes, employee is getting created after adding 0003 into the filter, but can u please answer my another question, i.e. PERNR in sender and receiver system should be same.
So in Receiver system (ECC) do i need to maintain external number range for PERNR?
Thanks

File not getting created in a different server

My requirement.
I have written a code in the BI system and now need to write an empty file (say a.done)in a directory /interfaces of PI system.
I wrote using open data set and close data set however the file (a.done) is not getting created in the PI system even though the directory /interfaces exist.
When I give any directory of that of BI system ,the file(a.done) is getting created i.e the file is getting created on the same server and not on the different server.
Is there any function module or any other way for the file to get generated in the PI system.
Please explain with an example.
Regards,
Vish

Try to use search FTP in se37 or checkout the below FM
CALL FUNCTION 'EPS_FTP_MPUT'
EXPORTING
    RFC_DESTINATION            =
*   FILE_MASK                  = ' '
*   LOCAL_DIRECTORY            = ' '
*   REMOTE_DIRECTORY           = ' '
*   OVERWRITE_MODE             = ' '
*   TEXT_MODE                  = ' '
*   TRANSMISSION_MONITOR       = 'X'
*   RECORDS_PER_TRANSFER       = 10
*   MONITOR_TITLE              =
*   MONITOR_TEXT1              =
*   MONITOR_TEXT2              =
*   PROGRESS_TEXT              =
* IMPORTING
*   LOCAL_DIRECTORY            =
*   REMOTE_DIRECTORY           =
*   LOCAL_SYSTEM_INFO          =
*   REMOTE_SYSTEM_INFO         =
* TABLES
*   FILE_LIST                  =
* EXCEPTIONS
*   CONNECTION_FAILED          = 1
*   INVALID_VERSION            = 2
*   INVALID_ARGUMENTS          = 3
*   GET_DIR_LIST_FAILED        = 4
*   FILE_TRANSFER_FAILED       = 5
*   STOPPED_BY_USER            = 6
*   OTHERS                     = 7
IF SY-SUBRC <> 0.
* Implement suitable error handling here
ENDIF.

Empty file is getting generated at Target FTP Folder side

HI all,
I have scenario like Idoc to File In Target FTP folder is empty file is generated, In adapter engine (communication channel) it shows the successfull status and pay load is getting created at Message display tool in the Message ID tab.But FTP server will receive only Empty file.
Please Give me some advise to resolve this issue..
Regards,
satya Tanuku

Hi Satya,
If you are using FCC then troubleshoot using this blog...
/people/arpit.seth/blog/2005/06/02/file-receiver-with-content-conversion
Regds,
Pinangshuk.

Some files never getting transferred to our FTP Server

We are moving configuration changes from one instance to another using 'Manage Implementation Projects' functionality. This PeopleTools functionality creates DM scripts to transfer functionality like Billing, Contracts, etc to another instance when you click 'Export'
It is supposed to send the scripts to 'FTP Server > psdata > PSFILEDIR' on a Windows system in Financials 9.1 using PT 8.53.04. We constantly get a 'Permission Denied' from this process when trying to do this.
This problem happens in all DEV instances, yet the process works fine in the Prod instance. I have examined the permissions in the PSFILEDIR and compared them in DEV and PROD and find no differences

I guess you didn't like my last answer. So I'll try again. First off, forget FTP. We don't even care about FTP and adding it to the Title of the question just confuses things and maybe gets you less responses. In production, does this open a Dialog box/Save window when the export finishes?
My assumption is that you have the variable PS_FILEDIR set to \\s-wpstbftp1\s$\psdata\PSFILEDIR for the app server. Is that true?
You are failing on line 10 which is
&PROJECT_FILE = GetFile(&FILENAME, "W", %FilePath_Relative);
The PSAPPSRV process is trying to open a file in write mode. It's using Relative Path which appends &FILENAME to the path which is determined by either PS_FILEDIR or PS_SERVDIR. This part of the code is not even the part where the file is supposed to be placed at a final destination. This is very initial step in creating the file, nothing is being written yet. The PSAPPSRV process at this point knows nothing about FTP or other network transfer protocols, it simply knows that it should use \\s-wpstbftp1\s$\psdata\PSFILEDIR as the path. To the PSAPPSRV process this is a path that is locally available on the server,wWhen the system call comes through to the OS to attempt to open this file, the operating system is what allows this to seamlessly connect to a network resource.
There are two potential points where for this and they both relate to the user running the PSAPPSRV process.
You are using the Admin share for the S: drive on s-wpstbftp1. This means any connection to this PATH must be made as a user that is an Administrator on server s-wpstbftp1.
The PSAPPSRV processes must be running as a user that is an Administrator on the other server. This requires configuring the Oracle ProcMGR Windows service to run as a user that has access to the resources in question.
So to fix this you need to look at the ProcMGR service and set it to run as an Administrator user from s-wpstbftp1. This may require additional tasks such as setting up that user on the PeopleSoft server. Use task manager to look at what user is running the PSAPPSRV processes and make sure it's the user you need it to be.
In my humble opinion though, this is bad configuration:
You shouldn't be using Admin shares
I don't like relying on remote server paths that aren't redundant storage devices (NAS or SAN). What if this server is down and other processes need to use this path?
You appear to be expecting this file at a location where it is created for further processing by the code, not the final destination. The file is intended to be downloaded by the user. I don't know why the developer decided to leave the file on the file system, but they may decide to clean up after themselves or change how this works in the future. The file is created, inserted into the database, then read from the database, sent to the user, and deleted from the database. The code calls DetachAttachment which the PeopleCode Language Reference book says:
Use the DetachAttachment function to download a file from its source storage location and save it locally on the end-user machine. The file is sent to the browser with appropriate HTTP headers to cause the browser to display a save dialog box to the user.

Noticed my hard drive getting filled, didn't save 500 Gb of data on it. I made the observation that hidden files are been created on the Hd. I assumed they were unnecessary and deleted most of them. To my dismay am getting a kernel panic msg. what to do?

I noticed my hard drive getting filled, didn't save 500 Gb of data on it. I made the observation that hidden files are been created on the Hd. I assumed they were unnecessary and deleted most of them. To my dismay am getting a kernel panic message. How do i go about getting this fixed?

Depending on what directory or directories you were erasing from you've certainly erased important system files and perhaps important applications files as well. If you have been using TimeMachine to back your computer up you should reboot into recovery mode (restart and hold Command + R until you see the Apple icon) and perform a restore.
If you haven't, boot into recovery mode anyway and choose the install OS option. Keep your fingers crossed that the OS is the only thing you deleted and that this works. You may also find it necessary to reinstall some of your software.

Weird filename are getting created in archive directory.

Hi All,
Weird filename are getting created in archive directory.
I have one ftp adapter,after the file getting processed the file's are getting moved to archive directory.
But with some different file name/ filename are randomly generated. But the content of the file remains the same.
Pls suggest.
Thanks.

This is standard functionality, it uses the original filename with a suffix of the datetime.
cheers
James

.xel file not getting created

Hi All,
I am using 9.1.0.2 version. I archived the xel.log file as it was getting very bigger in size after stopping oim_server through Weblogic console.
I expected that after I start the oim_server all log files will get created automatically.
I see some log files got created when I started OIM application but not xel.log.
Should I create it manually or should it get created automatically?
Thanks in advance,
Manohar

Open log.properties file. You can see entry for xel.log file. Create this file manually and restart OIM server. Make sure you create it manually using the same user, using which you are starting servers.
Alternativley, in log.properties configure loggers and provide there path.xel.log in case entry for xel.log is not there.
regards,
GP

Temporary tables are getting created, name starting with BIN$.....

Hi,
I am using Oracle 10.2 and am experiencing an issue that doing some operations on existing tables, some temporary tables are getting created starting with BIN$.
For ex: BIN$HULdSlmnRZmbCXAl/pkA9w==$0
But I dont see these tables in the database after two or three days. I found that these temporary tables are a replica of existing tables and these contain only the table structure but not the data. I even not able to drop them from database.
Can anyone throw some pointers on this?
Thanks and Regards,
Siva

These tables are in the Oracle recycle bin. When you drop a table, Oracle just renames it to BIN$xxx so that you can undrop the table if you made a mistake.
- You can ignore tables in the recycle bin if you would like. Oracle will automatically purge them when it needs the space.
- You can prevent a table from going in to the recycle bin by adding the purge command to the drop, i.e.
DROP TABLE table_name PURGE- You can empty out the recycle bin using the command
SQL> purge dba_recyclebin(or just recyclebin if you only want to clear out the objects you own from the recyclebin).
Justin

How the ASN in or out messages are getting created whenever there is any action performed related to these messages.

Hi ,
Can any one please let me know with an example like,
I have receive the ASNin message in SIM and then ASNOUT will get created and flowes to RMS.
How these ASNin or out messages are getting created.

Hi Keith,
You stated that "I think Geoff's showing remarkable tolerance by not just deleting the whole thread." Are we in the third world countries that there are no freedom of speech?!!!
I appreciate your help.
Some of you mentioned that I don't know how to use it. I have a question for you where did you learn how to use Lightroom? I learned the same way everyone learns. Study the subjects by reading books, videos, taking classes and enroll in some kind of training. I am following all the instructions that I can my hand on. I wish that instead of accusing me of not knowing have a different view of the issue. What if there is a bug in the program? Some of you were and are very successful and that does not mean that the program does not have some issues. We all use the program differently, and with these differences ways in using it some problems will come out for some and not for others.
I am not promoting one program over the other, and I am not putting Lightroom down. I am just expressing how I feel. Put yourself in my shoes and spent just hours creating some renaming templates and suddenly you find out that it is not there anymore and all your efforts are gone with the wind. I then go and search through the internet to find out what did I do wrong and how to solve it. I find out that I am not alone, and there others that still waiting for the solution to come.
Let be open and do not hush people, and when you do that it will be the end of any progress or improvement on how everything is.
I would like to express my deepest gratitude to all of you. You are all supportive and very helpful.
Thank you and have a very Happy New Year.
Mo

DefaultTrace. x .trc are getting creating around 6 for minute

Hi Gurus,
In one of our production system at \j2ee\cluster\server0\log\defaultTrace.<x>.trc these traces files are getting generated around 6 for every minute with 10 MB each. Not sure why these many are getting created and everytime 10 MB each?
Please help me with some fix
Thanks in adavance
Regards
Sekhar

Old logs are compressed (zipped up) to save disk space. By default, logs are written to a maximum of five files with 10MB capacity of each file. Thus, when this set of five files are full, it will rotate back to the first file and start overwriting the old logs. Before overwriting the old logs, the Log Configurator service backs up the five files into a zip file. So, each zip file contains a set of five log files. The logs within these zip files are called archive logs

Backups of the JVM.CONFIG file are not created

Backups of the JVM.CONFIG file are not created.
CF10 > Server Settings > Java and JVM in part says:
Backups of the jvm.config file are created when you hit the submit button. You can use this backup to restore from a critical change.
CF10 Help page indicates jvm.bak will be created:
http://help.adobe.com/en_US/ColdFusion/10.0/Admin/WSc3ff6d0ea77859461172e0811cbf3638e6-7ff c.html#WSc3ff6d0ea77859461172e0811cbf3638e6-7feb
Note Help indicates incorrectly JVM.CONFIG and BAK are in cf_root\runtime\bin where as JVM.CONFIG is located cf_root\instance\bin .
Thanks in advance, Carl.

I must have not had enough coffee - JVM.BAK is created in where JVM.CONFIG is found. Pardon me.

The words in the .docx (MSWord 2010) file are getting merged when the file is transferred to another computer for printing. What could be the reason?

The words in my .docx file are getting merged when the file is transferred to another computer for printing. For eg. the sentence "rate of success ......" is displayed as "rateof success" on the other computer. What could
be the reason for this? How to solve this issue?

Have you checked that the document is using the exact same font on both machines? If the second machine doesn't have the font installed that's used in the original document on the first machine, Word will pick the closest matching font, and that may
display slightly differently.

Why 2BDOCS are getting created for sending Sold to Party to ECC.

Hi,
I have a question, when BP (Sold to) gets create in CRM & replicates in successfully ECC.When I see Tran SMW01, I found two bdocs are getting created for same Sold to. Why this is happening!! How I can remove the another Bdoc type (VEND_MAIN).
Please suggest.

Hello Developer,
Yes, I've checked the combinations of webshop(In Shopadmin) and Product Catalog.(Sales Area)
All of them are compatible.
Hey DJ,
When you say: u201Cthe first entry maintained in the USAPPLREF tableu201Du2026.in our case, there are 2 entries for my user (PPELA3). The first one is for object type BUS1006001 and object key nr° 23263-my contact person, linked to sold-to nr° 1000003), which is the employee that I 've created in the ISAUSERADMIN.
The second entry is with object type KNA1 with object key nr° 1000003 (which is the sold-to).
Those are the only entries for my user in this table.
Does this sequence have the influence described by you? Is that what you want to say?
Other point: Does the REFERENCE CUSTOMER is important for the B2B scenario? (Our case) Since I thought it was important just for B2C scenarios, It was the same number in SHOPADMIN Webshop creation.
In the meantime, I will create a new reference customer and change the webshop parameters.
Thanks for your inputs.
Regards,
Paulo Pela

Coded UI - Test Results/Out - The binary files are getting copied to the TestResults/Out folder

Hi,
I am using Visual Studio 2013 for developing the Coded UI Automation Scripts.
Whenever I execute a Coded UI Automation Script, the binary files are getting copied to the TestResults/Out folder.
I do not want these binary files to be copied to OUT folder, and I have tried disabling the Deployment option under Test Settings > Deployment, but still the behavior is the same.
Could you please advice, how to disable copying binary files into the Out directory.
Thanks in Advance.
Regards,
Karthick K

Hi Karthick K,
From your description, as far as I know that when we enable Tracing and HtmlLogger for Coded UI Test and then run the coded UI test, we will get the Test Results/Out folder automatically.
So it is default that the Out folder includes some files like codeduitestproject6.dll, CodedUITestProject6.pdb etc, we could not disable copying binary files into the Out directory.
However, there have a replace workaround is I suggest you can disable Tracing and HtmlLogger for Coded UI Test. After you disable the Tracing and HtmlLogger for Coded UI Test, it will not generate the Out folder.
Similarly, it will not get the binary files.
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/visualstudioalm/archive/2012/11/08/enabling-htmllogger-in-coded-ui-test.aspx
If you still want to this feature, I suggest you could submit this feature request:
http://visualstudio.uservoice.com/forums/121579-visual-studio. The Visual Studio product team is listening to user voice there. You can send your idea there and people can vote. If
you submit this suggestion, I hope you could post that link here, I will help you vote it.
Thanks for your understanding.
Best Regards,
We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
Click
HERE to participate the survey.

Empty files are getting created at receiver FTP server

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for