Encrypted response from a SOAP Sender???

Hi,
I am implementing a WS scenario SOAP<->XI<->RFC securing the exchanges (SOAP<->XI) using WSS .
The scenario works fine with an encrypted SOAP request but I would also need the SOAP response to be encrypted...
I have my communication channel configured to use the Security Profile (WSS) and a Sender agreement configured with the keys for the decryption.
I do not understand how to achieve the encryption of the SOAP response as only the decryption options are available on the sender agreement...
Please help!!!
Thanks,
Adalbert

Adalbert,
if you have have selected "Select Security Profile" in the sender soap communication channel, you should see two fields for Security Settings in the Sender Agreement, one for the request and one for the response.
Check this out: http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/1f/7e2441509fa831e10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm
What version/SP of XI are you in?
Regards,
Henrique.

Similar Messages

Request Response Bean for SOAP Sender Adapter

Hi Friends,
Is it possible to use Request Response Bean Module described (FIle to RFC to File here) for SOAP(sender) and JDBC(receiver) adapter?
I want to configure SOAP to JDBC to JDBC scenario.
http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/HOME/UsingRequestResponseBeanModuleinFILE+Adapter
Scenario:
I will do SOAP adapter call Asynchronously and JDBC receiver adapter will select data from database. This response will go back to SOAP adapter and then SOAP will divert this response to another JDBC adapter. This JDBC adapter will insert data into another database.
I do not want to use ccBPM. Is there any design approach to implement this scenario?
Thanks,
Sandeep Maurya

Hi Sandeep,
SAP says SOAP sender adapter does not support Modules. You can serch Help.sap (for SOAP sender channel) to find the same.
I would suggest to use AXIS adapter (provides all the functionality of SOAP) and supports the Modules as well.
I have used the Module beans that you mentioned in the past... but it is not consistent with its processing.. sometimes it stucks with Message ID issue... I have seen same issue faced some other friends as well .. search on SDN you will find the issue with these modules...
Using BPM would be another option...
Thanks,
Sunil Singh

Getting 400 Bad Request response from Beehive SOAP API

Hi,
I'm trying to consume beehive web services via SOAP, more specifically I'm trying to upload a file into a workspace however at this point of the implementation I'm stuck getting 400 responses from the server.
I'm trying to upload a file using the createDocument() method that's located on the contentManagementService, indeed in the line that I call to that method is in which my app stops and returns the exception of error 400
I'm attaching a sample of the message I'm sending, at this point I understand every parameter that it's being sent except for the contentStreamId parameter, I don't know what it means, the documentation doesn't explain it either.
Does anyone has an idea of what's that paremeter for and how to use it properly?
Here's a sample of code I'm using:
// add new document
String str = "Test body.Test body.Test body.Test body.Test body.Test body.\r" +
"Test body.Test body.Test body.Test body.Test body.Test body.\r" +
"Test body.Test body.Test body.Test body.Test body.Test body.\r" +
"Test body.Test body.Test body.Test body.Test body.Test body.\r" +
"Test body.Test body.Test body.Test body.Test body.Test body.\r" +
"Test body.Test body.Test body.Test body.Test body.Test body.\r" +
"Test body.Test body.Test body.Test body.Test body.Test body.\r" +
"Test body.Test body.Test body.Test body.Test body.Test body.\r" +
"Test body.Test body.Test body.Test body.Test body.Test body.\r" +
"Test body.Test body.Test body.Test body.Test body.Test body.\r" +
"Test body.Test body.Test body.Test body.Test body.Test body.\r" +
"Test body.Test body.Test body.Test body.Test body.Test body.\r" +
"Test body.Test body.Test body.Test body.Test body.Test body.\r" +
"Test body.Test body.Test body.Test body.Test body.Test body.\r" +
"Test body.Test body.Test body.Test body.Test body.Test body.\r" +
"Test body.Test body.Test body.Test body.Test body.Test body.\r" +
"Test body.Test body.Test body.Test body.Test body.Test body.\r" +
"Test body.Test body.Test body.Test body.Test body.Test body.\r";
byte[] docContent = str.getBytes("UTF8");
DocumentCreator docCreator = new DocumentCreator();
docCreator.setConflictResolutionMode(ConflictResolutionMode.OVERWRITE);
docCreator.setName("File" + System.currentTimeMillis()%10000 + ".txt");
docCreator.setParent(teamWksp.getDefaultDocumentsFolder().getCollabId());
IdentifiableSimpleContentUpdater iscu = new IdentifiableSimpleContentUpdater();
iscu.setContentStreamId(docContent.toString());
DocumentUpdater docUpdater = new DocumentUpdater();
docUpdater.setContentUpdater(iscu);
docCreator.setUpdater(docUpdater);
Document doc = contentMgmtServiceSoap.createDocument(docCreator, docContent,projFull);
here's the message being sent:
<S:Envelope>
     <S:Body>
          <ns3:createDocument>
               <creator>
                    <ns2:conflictResolutionMode>OVERWRITE</ns2:conflictResolutionMode>
                    <ns2:name>File8692.txt</ns2:name>
                    <ns2:parent>
                         <ns2:id>334B:3BF0:afrh:38893C00F42F38A1E0404498C8A6612B00023FF3F175</ns2:id>
                         <ns2:resourceType>afrh</ns2:resourceType>
                    </ns2:parent>
                    <ns2:updater>
                         <ns2:contentUpdater xsi:type="ns2:identifiableSimpleContentUpdater">
                              <ns2:contentStreamId>[B@70751932</ns2:contentStreamId>
                         </ns2:contentUpdater>
                    </ns2:updater>
               </creator>
               <dhandler>VGVzdCBib2R5LlRlc3QgYm9keS5UZXN0IGJvZHkuVGVzdCBib2R5LlRlc3QgYm9keS5UZXN0IGJvZHkuDVRlc3QgYm9keS5UZXN0IGJvZHkuVGVzdCBib2R5LlRlc3QgYm9keS5UZXN0IGJvZHkuVGVzdCBib2R5Lg1UZXN0IGJvZHkuVGVzdCBib2R5LlRlc3QgYm9keS5UZXN0IGJvZHkuVGVzdCBib2R5LlRlc3QgYm9keS4NVGVzdCBib2R5LlRlc3QgYm9keS5UZXN0IGJvZHkuVGVzdCBib2R5LlRlc3QgYm9keS5UZXN0IGJvZHkuDVRlc3QgYm9keS5UZXN0IGJvZHkuVGVzdCBib2R5LlRlc3QgYm9keS5UZXN0IGJvZHkuVGVzdCBib2R5Lg1UZXN0IGJvZHkuVGVzdCBib2R5LlRlc3QgYm9keS5UZXN0IGJvZHkuVGVzdCBib2R5LlRlc3QgYm9keS4NVGVzdCBib2R5LlRlc3QgYm9keS5UZXN0IGJvZHkuVGVzdCBib2R5LlRlc3QgYm9keS5UZXN0IGJvZHkuDVRlc3QgYm9keS5UZXN0IGJvZHkuVGVzdCBib2R5LlRlc3QgYm9keS5UZXN0IGJvZHkuVGVzdCBib2R5Lg1UZXN0IGJvZHkuVGVzdCBib2R5LlRlc3QgYm9keS5UZXN0IGJvZHkuVGVzdCBib2R5LlRlc3QgYm9keS4NVGVzdCBib2R5LlRlc3QgYm9keS5UZXN0IGJvZHkuVGVzdCBib2R5LlRlc3QgYm9keS5UZXN0IGJvZHkuDVRlc3QgYm9keS5UZXN0IGJvZHkuVGVzdCBib2R5LlRlc3QgYm9keS5UZXN0IGJvZHkuVGVzdCBib2R5Lg1UZXN0IGJvZHkuVGVzdCBib2R5LlRlc3QgYm9keS5UZXN0IGJvZHkuVGVzdCBib2R5LlRlc3QgYm9keS4NVGVzdCBib2R5LlRlc3QgYm9keS5UZXN0IGJvZHkuVGVzdCBib2R5LlRlc3QgYm9keS5UZXN0IGJvZHkuDVRlc3QgYm9keS5UZXN0IGJvZHkuVGVzdCBib2R5LlRlc3QgYm9keS5UZXN0IGJvZHkuVGVzdCBib2R5Lg1UZXN0IGJvZHkuVGVzdCBib2R5LlRlc3QgYm9keS5UZXN0IGJvZHkuVGVzdCBib2R5LlRlc3QgYm9keS4NVGVzdCBib2R5LlRlc3QgYm9keS5UZXN0IGJvZHkuVGVzdCBib2R5LlRlc3QgYm9keS5UZXN0IGJvZHkuDVRlc3QgYm9keS5UZXN0IGJvZHkuVGVzdCBib2R5LlRlc3QgYm9keS5UZXN0IGJvZHkuVGVzdCBib2R5Lg1UZXN0IGJvZHkuVGVzdCBib2R5LlRlc3QgYm9keS5UZXN0IGJvZHkuVGVzdCBib2R5LlRlc3QgYm9keS4N</dhandler>
               <projection value="FULL" xsi:type="ns2:projection"/>
          </ns3:createDocument>
     </S:Body>
</S:Envelope>

Did you manage to successfully upload the file? If you did, please give solution.
Thanks

File To Proxy : Handle the response from ECC to send mail without BPM

Hi,
Scenario: FILE To Proxy
Requirement: We are receiving xml acknowledgement file from bank with IDoc number and status in SAP PI and the file is used to send the status number, message and and IDoc number to ECC. After request is received in ECC BAPI is executed to update the original status of outbound IDOC.
There would be multiple records in file and PI will send all IDoc acknowledgement to ECC to update the IDoc status.
Issue: Since PI send all records to ecc, if any single IDoc status update is failing in ECC how would it can be communicated to support.
ECC can send success or error response in proxy but how we can use the same in PI to send mail to support. Or is there any better error handling we can go for in such scenario.
Thanks,
Vertika

Hi everyone
thanks for response.
Interface 1: IDoc (ECC) to File (Bank) --> Done
Interface 2: Acknowledgment File (Bank) to BAPI (ECC) where BAPI will update the status of IDoc sent in first interface.
For Interface 2 : PI will receive file from Bank with multiple records i.e multiple IDoc numbers and their status. PI will invoke proxy to send the IDoc number and status number (eg 16) for all the records together. Now if BAPI fails to update status of any single IDoc in that file how support team will know that the particular record is failed. To handle this error ECC is saying they can send Error and Success back to PI. But the problem is how we can use that response in PI in the same interface to send emails to support team. Bank does not want any response back in this case. This is just to ensure proper error handling since this is bank related interface.
Splitting the interface in two interfaces will definitely help. But is there some way which can be used in same interface and based on error response from ECC mail is triggered.
If any one has better suggestion for such kind of error handling, please post the same.
Thanks,
Vertika

Response delay in Soap Sender while processing large messages

Hi Experts,
              In one of the scenario our sender adapter is SOAP. After receiving the message its sending back the Response as HTTP 200 OK for success messges it is working fine when the message is small. When ever i am getting a large message that time its taking little bit processing time so my sender system not getting the HTTP 200 OK with in the time. (Suppose with in 3 seconds). In this case source system is sendin again the same message thinking that message is not success.
My Sender system they dont want to increase the waiting time from 3 second to .. Seconds
I cont use AAE becasue we are at 7.0.
I have to use Adapter Engine. I will not using direct communicatin with Integration Server.
     Can you please let me know how can i resolve this issue..
Thanks & Regards,
Puru

>>In this case source system is sendin again the same message thinking that message is not success.My Sender system they dont want to increase the waiting time from 3 second to .. Seconds
Looks like you are doing asynchronous SOAP scenario.   You could adjust the message reprocessing time little bit later. I meant Pi does automatic reprocess messages after sometime if the mesg gets in to error state.
<IRRELEVANT LINK>
Edited by: Prateek Raj Srivastava on Mar 12, 2011 6:24 PM

Getting response from Database by sending in parameters

Hi,
I am providing parameter which supplies string values to query the database using adapter. I can see the invoke activity sending the string value to the database, but respnse message does not contain anthing.
Can someone please tell me how to retrieve records from database by suplying parmeter value?
Thank You
Anil

hi Anil,
use a simple stored procedure or pl/sql function and specify the input and output parameters. We can send any no of parameters to a function and a function can able to return a value. so you can achieve your requirement using pl/sql functions. Learn about that more.
when you will define ParterLink (using DBAdapter browing databse to select your function ), you shud be able to view one OUT parameter with datatype what you have mentioned earlier in pl/sql function. When you define Invoke for that Parterlink, you should get Invoke Output variable with output variable (having name of that function.)
If you cannot browse the function in your DB Adapter, just make sure that the user you have defined in DB Adapter has enough privileges to access that function.
Regards
Rajesh A

Response from webservice needs to send as Mail content

Hello,
i have to configure a scenario as given below
IDOC --> JDBC --> WebService and response from WebService to SMTPmail receiver.
now i got strucked at Webservice response. after i got the response from WebService(SOAP), i need to send the both Request and response to Mail Receiver. So Please let me know how to capture request and response both to my SMTPmail adapter(as content or attachment).let me know the steps to proceed for SMTPmail Receiver
Regards,SARAN

Hi Raj,
Thanks for teh reply.
i have already configured teh above mentioned scenario.but i am not able to get Request and response.
Could you pelase provide teh steps how to configure BPM in this scenario..(as ia m not handson with BPM)
Reagrds,Saran

Problem with Soap Sender CC

Hi,
SOAP - Proxy.
I have 3 seperate Scenarios in PI 7.0 in different Name space, with different Message interface names, under same SWC.
I imported them to PI 7.1 and used the same format that help says... with Service:cc and gave it to the calling service.
During my import, I noticed that the Message Interface and Name space were knocked off from the SOAP Sender adapter in PI 7.1. The scenarios are configured and working currently.
I have 3 CC in this format. In Soap sender CC, we will specify NS and Interface name. Thus I had to use 3 CC.
As per SAP Note 856597, the sender CC format should be...
http://host:port/XISOAPAdapter/MessageServlet?senderParty=FP&senderService=FS&interface=IF&receiverParty=TP&receiverService=TS&interfaceNamespace=IFNamespace
Now, in 7.10 we dont need to specify NS and Message Interface in soap sender CC. Hence, I created 3 sender URL for each scenario to call to PI 7.10 ( based on the interface / NS names ) and I have created 1 CC only instead of 3. This I thought would work because the sender CC is not tied with NS or MI any more, which are included in URL, and thus I have 3 different calling URLs.
Now, when I do this and activate, it is always calling only one service all the time.
Regards,
Venkat.

I have used the other channels in the same format. only NS and MI name changed. Sender and receiver are same.
We do specify outbound Interface and its NS in sender Soap CC prior to 7.1.
Morever, I am following the format as per the note I specified above.
It is able to call PI 7.1 succesfully but failing to call proper IM and MM.
No error mesage but only one scenario is called all the time.
Its like this...
prior to 7.1, we will have MI and NS info on the sender Soap sender CC. Hence we just mention the name of the CC in the target URL along with service. so it picks up the NS and MI from CC.
in 7.1, since we dont specify NS and MI in sender Soap CC, we have to notify the sender side MI and NS and we do that in sender side URL( to be given to the calling system ).
Now as per my understanding, since no NS or MI dependant info is speicfied in CC, I thought we can use one single CC instead of 3.
See my thought looks reasonable ...
but wondering why it isnt working.
Regards,
Venkat.

Another problem with SOAP sender

I have another problem with SOAP scenario in a different environment (PI 7.0) from my earlier post.
Scenario:
Soap Sender -> PI -> Soap Receiver
Following steps from GoogleSearch SOAP scenario in the SAP How-to Guide for SAP NetWeaver '04 entitled: "How To... Use the XI 3.0 SOAP Adapter" version 1.00 - March 2006.
I have loaded in the api.google.com/GoogleSearch.wsdl file as an External definition and created the SOAP receiver as described in the How-to guide. It takes a doGoogleSearch as input and sends back a doGoogleSearchResponse (Sync Call).
Note that the GoogleSearch.wsdl contains a complex type ResultElementArray that refers to ResultElement\[\], and a DirectoryCategoryArray that refers to DirectoryCategory\[\]. The ResultElement and DirectoryCategory types are defined in the GoogleSearch.wsdl file.
Problem One:
The generated WSDL for the SOAP sender contains the ResultElementArray and DirectoryCategoryArray types but it DOES NOT contain the required ResultElement and DirectoryCategory types. XML Spy complains that this WSDL is not valid because the type ResultElement\[\] is not defined.
Problem Two:
I generate a SOAP message in XML Spy, provide values for the doGoogleSearch fields, and send. In SXMB_MONI, the SOAP sender payload contains only the <key> value from the doGoogleSearch message body, i.e. <part name="key" type="xsd:string" />
The other doGoogleSearch fields seem to be missing, i.e.
<part name="q" type="xsd:string" />
<part name="start" type="xsd:int" />
<part name="maxResults" type="xsd:int" />
<part name="filter" type="xsd:boolean" />
<part name="restrict" type="xsd:string" />
<part name="safeSearch" type="xsd:boolean" />
<part name="lr" type="xsd:string" />
<part name="ie" type="xsd:string" />
<part name="oe" type="xsd:string" />
Does anyone know why:
(1) PI/XI seems to leave out the ResultElement and DirectoryCategory types from the SOAP sender service WSDL file?
(2) The doGoogleSearch message seen in SXMB_MONI contains only the first <key> field, and not the other fields?
Thanks for any help with this.

I have another problem with SOAP scenario in a different environment (PI 7.0) from my earlier post.
Scenario:
Soap Sender -> PI -> Soap Receiver
Following steps from GoogleSearch SOAP scenario in the SAP How-to Guide for SAP NetWeaver '04 entitled: "How To... Use the XI 3.0 SOAP Adapter" version 1.00 - March 2006.
I have loaded in the api.google.com/GoogleSearch.wsdl file as an External definition and created the SOAP receiver as described in the How-to guide. It takes a doGoogleSearch as input and sends back a doGoogleSearchResponse (Sync Call).
Note that the GoogleSearch.wsdl contains a complex type ResultElementArray that refers to ResultElement\[\], and a DirectoryCategoryArray that refers to DirectoryCategory\[\]. The ResultElement and DirectoryCategory types are defined in the GoogleSearch.wsdl file.
Problem One:
The generated WSDL for the SOAP sender contains the ResultElementArray and DirectoryCategoryArray types but it DOES NOT contain the required ResultElement and DirectoryCategory types. XML Spy complains that this WSDL is not valid because the type ResultElement\[\] is not defined.
Problem Two:
I generate a SOAP message in XML Spy, provide values for the doGoogleSearch fields, and send. In SXMB_MONI, the SOAP sender payload contains only the <key> value from the doGoogleSearch message body, i.e. <part name="key" type="xsd:string" />
The other doGoogleSearch fields seem to be missing, i.e.
<part name="q" type="xsd:string" />
<part name="start" type="xsd:int" />
<part name="maxResults" type="xsd:int" />
<part name="filter" type="xsd:boolean" />
<part name="restrict" type="xsd:string" />
<part name="safeSearch" type="xsd:boolean" />
<part name="lr" type="xsd:string" />
<part name="ie" type="xsd:string" />
<part name="oe" type="xsd:string" />
Does anyone know why:
(1) PI/XI seems to leave out the ResultElement and DirectoryCategory types from the SOAP sender service WSDL file?
(2) The doGoogleSearch message seen in SXMB_MONI contains only the first <key> field, and not the other fields?
Thanks for any help with this.

Response from PI in SOAP to SOAP Scenario

Hi,
My scenario is Soap to SOAP sending purchase orders. they want acknowledgement from PI whether PI received the message or not in the form of SOAP response.
sender system not expecting the response after the message processing in receiver system, they are expecting the response when PI receives message from them.
As any way they receive HTTP200 OK acknowledgement is it necessary that to send the SOAP response from PI by developing BPM?
Is it a good way of doing it?
Is any other way of doing it?
Your suggestions will be helpful to me.
Thank you.
Santhi.

Hi Santhi,
Please refer to SAP Note 856597 - SOAP Adapter FAQ Question number 2
2. Sender Asynchronous Calls
o Q: What are the correct sender options for asynchronous calls?
When the client sends a SOAP message and checks if the response is
an HTTP 200 response message with an empty soap envelope or an HTTP
202 response message with no content, the quality of service with
AtLeastOnce can be realized. In this case, the client must resend
the message until such a successful response is returned. When the
message successfully accepted by the adapter, an HTTP 200 response
with an empty SOAP envelope or an HTTP 202 response message with no
content is returned.
You don't have to do anything. When an async message is sent, PI will either reply with a 200 with an empty SOAP Envelope or an HTTP 202 with no content . That will serve as your acknowledgement.
Regards,
Mark

SOAP Sender Adapter Attachment Handling in Response message

Hi Experts,
I have a SOAP <> XI <> Proxy scenario where an external WS client sends a SOAP request and receives a SOAP response along with an attachment.
The problem is that the WS client is unable to retrieve the attachment from the SOAP response although the SXI_MONITOR shows both the payload and attachment beign sent out. In the SOAP sender I 'DO NOT' tick the 'Keep Attachment' parameter.
If I tick the 'Keep Attachment' parameter, then the payload and attachment both goes as attachment.
I need help in writing an adapter module which would ensure that the payload remains as the main payload and only the additional attachment goes out as an attachment.
Regards,
Shobhit

Hi Shobhit
You can refer this generic guide
How to create adapter modules for J2EE engine
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/3bdc14e1-0901-0010-b5a9-a01e29d75a6a
How-to create a web service with attachments (SOAP With Attachments)
How-to create a web service with attachments (SOAP With Attachments)
Rename Attachment Adapter Module
Rename Attachment Adapter Module
Hope this will help
Thanks
Gaurav

Sending encrypted emails from the iPad is not working

I can't get sending encrypted emails working on my iPad3 running iOS 8.0.2
Let me explain what I did:
1. I created S/MIME certificates for 2 email addresses on my iMac in Keychain Access. One email address exists only on the iMac the other only on the iPad.
2. I set "When using this certificate" to "Always Trust" in both certificates.
3. I exported 1 S/MIME certificate (p12) and installed it on the iPad. Then I deleted this certificate and its private&public keys in iMac Keychain Access
4. I exchanged public certificates between the 2 devices. I installed one certificate in iMac Keychain Access and the other in iPad/Settings/General/Profiles.
5. On the iMac in the iPad certificate I set "When using this certificate" to "Always Trust"
6. I tested whether I can send and receive signed and/or encrypted emails
Results:
1. From the iMac I can send signed and/or encrypted emails to the iPad.
    On the iPad I can read the encrypted emails. The signature is not trusted
2. On the iPad I can send signed messages to the iMac. On the iMac the signature is trusted.
    I cannot send encrypted emails from the iPad to the iMac. The iPad doesn't know about the public certificate in iPad/Settings/General/Profiles
So much for the straight forward part. Now it gets a bit more complicated and confusing.
1. I deleted the iMac certificate in the iPad/Settings/General/Profiles. Then in iPad Mail I opened the signed mail coming from the iMac.
    I viewed the untrusted certificate in Mail and installed it. From this point on all signed emails from the iMac are trusted.
    Strangely the by this method installed certificate doesn't appear in iPad/Settings/General/Profiles.
    Furthermore I still cannot send encrypted messages to the iMac. This certificate installation seems to be used only to check trust worthiness of the signature.
    Installing on top the iMac public certificate in iPad/Settings/General/Profiles doesn't enable to send encrypted messages from the iPad either.
To be sure that this problem relates to the iPad certificate management and is not related to an error by me I did the following:
1. I transferred a p12 file for a certificate that I created in my iMac to a PC running Windows7.
2. I transferred a p12 file plus its public key (.pem) that I created in my iMac to another iMac into Keychain Access. (I have not tested if the pem is needed).
3. On the other iMac and the PC I made sure that the certificates are trusted.
    On the PC that means in the Certificate Manager the p12 needs to be in the "Personal" folder and in the "Trusted Root Certification Authorities" folder.
    The public keys need to be in the "Trusted People" folder and the "Other People" folder. One can just copy/paste the certificates.
4. In both cases I deleted the certificate and public/private keys on my iMac.
5. I exchanged public certificates between the devices.
6. I tested exchanging signed and/or encrypted emails between my iMac and the PC and my iMac and the other iMac.
Result:
1. I can send signed and/or encrypted emails to the other iMac and the PC
2. The PC and the other iMac trust the signature from my iMac and can read the encrypted emails
3. My iMac can read encrypted emails from the PC and the other iMac
4. My iMac trusts emails with signatures from the PC and the other iMac.
Everything is working as it should.
After the above test I wanted to see whether I can set up encrypted email exchange between the iPad and the PC. Strangely iPad Mail recognized the public certificate from the PC installed in iPad/Settings/General/Profiles and allowed me to send an encrypted email to the PC. However, on the PC I was unable to read the encrypted email. And the other way around, encrypted emails send from the PC to the iPad cannot be read on the iPad.
My conclusion from all this testing is that iPad mail encryption is still "under construction".

I was able to resolve the above described problem to some degree. Setting up sending and receiving encrypted emails between iOS and OSX I have working.
What is still not working is reading encrypted emails on the iPad/iOS8 received from Windows 7 PC. And sending encrypted emails to Windows 7 PC.
The details about how I solved part of the problem are described here.

Wrong message type while sending response from TP

Hi,
We are simulating a scenario in which the host is sending a Rosetta over RNIF request to TP. The request is getting completed and acknowledgement is reaching the host properly.
Now we are trying to send back a response from TP for the above request. But the following error is being observed:-
2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:884: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.data.MsgListener:onMessage Enter
2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:884: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) DBContext beginTransaction: Enter
2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:884: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) DBContext beginTransaction: Transaction.begin()
2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:884: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) DBContext beginTransaction: Leave
2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:884: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.data.MsgListener:onMessage Action Name: null
2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:884: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) Generic Wizard:getTradingPartnerNames Enter
2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:884: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) Generic Wizard:getTradingPartnerNames tpitValue >>
2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:884: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) Generic Wizard:getTradingPartnerNames Exit
2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:884: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.data.MsgListener:onMessage All TPs list for broadcasting[]
2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:884: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.data.MsgListener:onMessage ipmsgold.get_MSG_ID()>G20090303035936810.34565d:11fc706dc89:-7fbc@706519011<
2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:884: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.data.MsgListener:onMessage ipmsg.getMessageID() >G20090303035936810.34565d:11fc706dc89:-7fbc@706519011<
2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:884: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) AQJMSCorrelationID = 91217C8567EB4A3EAC135BD382FD14E3
2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:884: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.data.MsgListener:onMessage ipmsg.getMessageID()>G20090303035936810.34565d:11fc706dc89:-7fbc@706519011<
2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:884: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.data.MsgListener:onMessage msgIdFrmBkEnd>G20090303035936810.34565d:11fc706dc89:-7fbc@706519011<
2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:900: Thread-24: B2B - (INFORMATION) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine:processOutgoingMessage Enter
2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:900: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) DBContext beginTransaction: Enter
2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:900: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) DBContext beginTransaction: Leave
2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:900: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) calling setFromPartyId() changing from null to TPName: COMSTOR Type: null Value: null
2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:900: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) calling setToPartyId() changing from null to TPName: BTGS Type: null Value: null
2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:900: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) calling setInitiatingPartyId() changing from null to TPName: null Type: null Value: null
2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:900: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine:processOutgoingMessage To TP NameBTGS
2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:900: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine:processOutgoingMessage From TP NameCOMSTOR
2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:900: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine:processOutgoingMessage business action name: null
2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:900: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine:processOutgoingMessage doctype name: Pip3A4PurchaseOrderConfirmation
2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:900: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine:processOutgoingMessage doctype revision: V02.03.00
2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:900: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine:processOutgoingMessage AppMsgIdG20090303035936810.34565d:11fc706dc89:-7fbc@706519011
2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:915: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine:processOutgoingMessage ipmsg.get_MSG_TYPE = 1
2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:915: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) calling setInitiatingPartyId() changing from TPName: null Type: null Value: null to TPName: COMSTOR Type: null Value: null
2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:915: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) Engine AQJMSCorrelationID = 91217C8567EB4A3EAC135BD382FD14E3
2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:915: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine:processOutgoingMessage using appMsgId as b2bMsgId
2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:915: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine:processOutgoingMessage B2B Message ID is G20090303035936810.34565d:11fc706dc89:-7fbc@706519011
2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:915: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine:processOutgoingMessage RefTo B2B Message ID is null
2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:915: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine:processOutgoingMessage isSignalMsg() == false; call outgoingTPA
2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:915: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAProcessor:processOutgoingTPA() Begin TPA Processing..
2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:915: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAProcessor:processTPA() PARTIES (before calling processParty) :
initial : null
from : TPName: COMSTOR Type: null Value: null
to : TPName: BTGS Type: null Value: null
final : null
initiating : TPName: COMSTOR Type: null Value: null
2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:915: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAProcessor:processTPA() direction is outgoing
2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:915: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAProcessor:processTPA() calling processparty with : TPName: COMSTOR Type: null Value: null
2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:915: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.RepoDataAccessor:processParty() Begin..
2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:931: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.RepoDataAccessor:processParty() COMSTOR is hosted party
2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:931: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.RepoDataAccessor:processParty() End..
2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:931: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAProcessor:processTPA() after calling processparty with : TPName: COMSTOR Type: null Value: null
2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:931: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAProcessor:processTPA() PARTIES (after calling processParty):
initial : null
from : TPName: COMSTOR Type: null Value: null
to : TPName: BTGS Type: null Value: null
final : null
initiating : TPName: COMSTOR Type: null Value: null
2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:931: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAProcessor:processTPA() docTypeName: Pip3A4PurchaseOrderConfirmation docTypeRevision: V02.03.00
2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:931: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAProcessor:processTPA() actionName: PurchaseOrderConfirmationAction actionRevision: V02.03.00
2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:931: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.RepoDataAccessor:getCollaborationDetails() Begin.. Activity Name : PurchaseOrderConfirmationAction Activity Version: V02.03.00
2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:962: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) calling setMode() changing from -1 to 2
2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:977: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) calling setMode() changing from 2 to 2
2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:977: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) calling setValidationEnabled() changing from null to false
2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:977: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.RepoDataAccessor:addCollaborationDetails() End..
2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:977: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAProcessor:processTPA() eventName:<PurchaseOrderConfirmationAction>
2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:977: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAProcessor:processTPA() messageType:1
2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:977: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) calling setInitiatingPartyId() changing from TPName: COMSTOR Type: null Value: null to TPName: COMSTOR Type: null Value: null
2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:977: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAProcessor:processTPA() TPA Name : null
2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:977: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAIdentifier:identifyTPA() Begin..
2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:977: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAIdentifier:identifyTPA()
From Party -> null-null-COMSTOR-Buyer To Party -> null-null-BTGS-Seller Collaboration -> 3A4
2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:977: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) RepoDataAccessor:getAgreementName(partyNAMES) Begin..
2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:977: Thread-24: B2B - (ERROR) Error -: AIP-50501: Trading partner agreement not found for the given input values: From party [NAME-ROLE] "COMSTOR-Buyer", To party [NAME-ROLE] "BTGS-Seller", Collaboration name "3A4"; also verify agreement effectiveToDate
     at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.RepoDataAccessor.getAgreementName(RepoDataAccessor.java:2133)
     at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAIdentifier.identifyTPA(TPAIdentifier.java:180)
     at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAProcessor.processTPA(TPAProcessor.java:561)
     at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAProcessor.processOutgoingTPA(TPAProcessor.java:216)
     at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine.processOutgoingMessage(Engine.java:1041)
     at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.data.MsgListener.onMessage(MsgListener.java:833)
     at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.data.MsgListener.run(MsgListener.java:400)
     at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:534)
2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:977: Thread-24: B2B - (ERROR) Error -: AIP-50501: Trading partner agreement not found for the given input values: From party [NAME-ROLE] "COMSTOR-Buyer", To party [NAME-ROLE] "BTGS-Seller", Collaboration name "3A4"; also verify agreement effectiveToDate
     at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.RepoDataAccessor.getAgreementName(RepoDataAccessor.java:2133)
     at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAIdentifier.identifyTPA(TPAIdentifier.java:180)
     at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAProcessor.processTPA(TPAProcessor.java:561)
     at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAProcessor.processOutgoingTPA(TPAProcessor.java:216)
     at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine.processOutgoingMessage(Engine.java:1041)
     at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.data.MsgListener.onMessage(MsgListener.java:833)
     at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.data.MsgListener.run(MsgListener.java:400)
     at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:534)
2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:977: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine:processOutgoingMessage B2BDomainException
2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:977: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine:handleOutboundException Updating Error Message: Error -: AIP-50501: Trading partner agreement not found for the given input values: From party [NAME-ROLE] "COMSTOR-Buyer", To party [NAME-ROLE] "BTGS-Seller", Collaboration name "3A4"; also verify agreement effectiveToDate
2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:977: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.msgproc.DbAccess:updateWireBusinessToErrorState Enter
2009.03.03 at 11:31:22:008: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.msgproc.DbAccess:updateWireBusinessToErrorState Wire message not found.
2009.03.03 at 11:31:22:008: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.msgproc.DbAccess:updateWireBusinessToErrorState Creating new b2berror object
2009.03.03 at 11:31:22:008: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.msgproc.DbAccess:updateWireBusinessToErrorState Updating business message error information
2009.03.03 at 11:31:22:024: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.msgproc.DbAccess:updateWireBusinessToErrorState Exit
2009.03.03 at 11:31:22:024: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine:handleOutboundException Updating Native Event Tbl Row
2009.03.03 at 11:31:22:024: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.msgproc.DbAccess:DbAccess:updateNativeEvtTblRow Enter
2009.03.03 at 11:31:22:024: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.msgproc.DbAccess:
** DbAccess:updateNativeEvtTblRow:tip_wireMsg wiremsg not found
2009.03.03 at 11:31:22:024: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine:handleOutboundException notifying App
2009.03.03 at 11:31:22:024: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) Engine:notifyApp Enter
2009.03.03 at 11:31:22:024: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) Enqueue Engine AQJMSCorrelationID = 91217C8567EB4A3EAC135BD382FD14E3
2009.03.03 at 11:31:22:024: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) notifyApp:notifyApp Enqueue the ip exception message:
<Exception xmlns="http://integration.oracle.com/B2B/Exception" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<correlationId>G20090303035936810.34565d:11fc706dc89:-7fbc@706519011</correlationId>
<b2bMessageId>G20090303035936810.34565d:11fc706dc89:-7fbc@706519011</b2bMessageId>
<errorCode>AIP-50501</errorCode>
<errorText>Trading partner agreement not found for the given input values: From party [NAME-ROLE] "COMSTOR-Buyer", To party [NAME-ROLE] "BTGS-Seller", Collaboration name "3A4"; also verify agreement effectiveToDate</errorText>
<errorDescription>
<![CDATA[Machine Info: (punin1879150941)
Description: Unable to identify the trading partner agreement from the given input values. Also verify agreement effectiveToDate
StackTrace:
Error -: AIP-50501: Trading partner agreement not found for the given input values: From party [NAME-ROLE] "COMSTOR-Buyer", To party [NAME-ROLE] "BTGS-Seller", Collaboration name "3A4"; also verify agreement effectiveToDate
     at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.RepoDataAccessor.getAgreementName(RepoDataAccessor.java:2133)
     at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAIdentifier.identifyTPA(TPAIdentifier.java:180)
     at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAProcessor.processTPA(TPAProcessor.java:561)
     at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAProcessor.processOutgoingTPA(TPAProcessor.java:216)
     at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine.processOutgoingMessage(Engine.java:1041)
     at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.data.MsgListener.onMessage(MsgListener.java:833)
     at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.data.MsgListener.run(MsgListener.java:400)
     at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:534)
]]>
</errorDescription>
<errorSeverity>2</errorSeverity>
</Exception>
2009.03.03 at 11:31:22:024: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) AQJMSCorrelationID = 91217C8567EB4A3EAC135BD382FD14E3
2009.03.03 at 11:31:22:039: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) Engine:notifyApp Exit
2009.03.03 at 11:31:22:039: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine:handleOutboundException Updated the Error Message Successfully: Error -: AIP-50501: Trading partner agreement not found for the given input values: From party [NAME-ROLE] "COMSTOR-Buyer", To party [NAME-ROLE] "BTGS-Seller", Collaboration name "3A4"; also verify agreement effectiveToDate
2009.03.03 at 11:31:22:039: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) DBContext commit: Enter
2009.03.03 at 11:31:22:055: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) DBContext commit: Transaction.commit()
2009.03.03 at 11:31:22:055: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) DBContext commit: Leave
2009.03.03 at 11:31:22:055: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.data.MsgListener:onMessage Exit
As it can be seen from the logs, the message type is being set to 1. However it should be 2 in case of response.
The following header properties are being used in the AQ stub:-
msgID = G20090303035936810.34565d:11fc706dc89:-7fbc@706519011
from = COMSTOR
to = BTGS
doctypeName = Pip3A4PurchaseOrderConfirmation
doctypeRevision = V02.03.00
payload = Pip3A4_Response_POA10170020309.xml
attachment =
Can you please let us know the reason for the wrong message type being set?
Regards,
Ravi Shah

Dheeraj,
We have included msgType=2 as a part of the AQ header.
The logs show that message type is getting set to 2 but still COMSTOR is Buyer and BTGS is Seller.
Because of this, agreement look-up is getting failed.
2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:825: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.data.MsgListener:onMessage Enter
2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:825: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) DBContext beginTransaction: Enter
2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:825: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) DBContext beginTransaction: Transaction.begin()
2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:825: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) DBContext beginTransaction: Leave
2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:825: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.data.MsgListener:onMessage Action Name: null
2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:825: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) Generic Wizard:getTradingPartnerNames Enter
2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:825: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) Generic Wizard:getTradingPartnerNames Exit
2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:825: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.data.MsgListener:onMessage All TPs list for broadcasting[]
2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:825: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.data.MsgListener:onMessage ipmsgold.get_MSG_ID()>G20090304062204707.e44c79:11fcbe016e5:-7fdc@706519011<
2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:825: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.data.MsgListener:onMessage ipmsg.getMessageID() >G20090304062204707.e44c79:11fcbe016e5:-7fdc@706519011<
2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:825: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) AQJMSCorrelationID = 72E9465AA77D4B70A1D1F327F359E819
2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:825: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.data.MsgListener:onMessage ipmsg.getMessageID()>G20090304062204707.e44c79:11fcbe016e5:-7fdc@706519011<
2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:825: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.data.MsgListener:onMessage msgIdFrmBkEnd>G20090304062204707.e44c79:11fcbe016e5:-7fdc@706519011<
2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:825: Thread-13: B2B - (INFORMATION) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine:processOutgoingMessage Enter
2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:825: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) DBContext beginTransaction: Enter
2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:825: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) DBContext beginTransaction: Leave
2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:825: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) calling setFromPartyId() changing from null to TPName: COMSTOR Type: null Value: null
2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:825: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) calling setToPartyId() changing from null to TPName: BTGS Type: null Value: null
2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:825: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) calling setInitiatingPartyId() changing from null to TPName: null Type: null Value: null
2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:825: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine:processOutgoingMessage To TP NameBTGS
2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:825: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine:processOutgoingMessage From TP NameCOMSTOR
2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:825: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine:processOutgoingMessage business action name: null
2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:825: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine:processOutgoingMessage doctype name: Pip3A4PurchaseOrderConfirmation
2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:825: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine:processOutgoingMessage doctype revision: V02.00
2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:825: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine:processOutgoingMessage AppMsgIdG20090304062204707.e44c79:11fcbe016e5:-7fdc@706519011
2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:825: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine:processOutgoingMessage ipmsg.get_MSG_TYPE = 2
2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:825: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) Engine AQJMSCorrelationID = 72E9465AA77D4B70A1D1F327F359E819
2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:825: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine:processOutgoingMessage using appMsgId as b2bMsgId
2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:825: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine:processOutgoingMessage B2B Message ID is G20090304062204707.e44c79:11fcbe016e5:-7fdc@706519011
2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:825: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine:processOutgoingMessage RefTo B2B Message ID is null
2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:825: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine:processOutgoingMessage isSignalMsg() == false; call outgoingTPA
2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:825: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAProcessor:processOutgoingTPA() Begin TPA Processing..
2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:825: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAProcessor:processTPA() PARTIES (before calling processParty) :
initial : null
from : TPName: COMSTOR Type: null Value: null
to : TPName: BTGS Type: null Value: null
final : null
initiating : TPName: null Type: null Value: null
2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:825: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAProcessor:processTPA() direction is outgoing
2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:825: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAProcessor:processTPA() calling processparty with : TPName: COMSTOR Type: null Value: null
2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:825: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.RepoDataAccessor:processParty() Begin..
2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:825: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.RepoDataAccessor:processParty() COMSTOR is hosted party
2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:825: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.RepoDataAccessor:processParty() End..
2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:841: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAProcessor:processTPA() after calling processparty with : TPName: COMSTOR Type: null Value: null
2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:841: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAProcessor:processTPA() PARTIES (after calling processParty):
initial : null
from : TPName: COMSTOR Type: null Value: null
to : TPName: BTGS Type: null Value: null
final : null
initiating : TPName: null Type: null Value: null
2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:841: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAProcessor:processTPA() docTypeName: Pip3A4PurchaseOrderConfirmation docTypeRevision: V02.00
2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:841: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAProcessor:processTPA() actionName: PurchaseOrderConfirmationAction actionRevision: V02.00
2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:841: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.RepoDataAccessor:getCollaborationDetails() Begin.. Activity Name : PurchaseOrderConfirmationAction Activity Version: V02.00
2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:856: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) calling setMode() changing from -1 to 2
2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:872: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) calling setMode() changing from 2 to 2
2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:872: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) calling setValidationEnabled() changing from null to false
2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:872: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.RepoDataAccessor:addCollaborationDetails() End..
2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:872: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAProcessor:processTPA() eventName:<PurchaseOrderConfirmationAction>
2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:872: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAProcessor:processTPA() messageType:2
2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:872: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) calling setInitiatingPartyId() changing from TPName: null Type: null Value: null to TPName: COMSTOR Type: null Value: null
2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:872: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAProcessor:processTPA() cpaID=null
2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:872: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAProcessor:processTPA() TPA Name : null
2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:872: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAProcessor:processTPA() TPA Name : null
2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:872: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAIdentifier:identifyTPA() Begin..
2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:872: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAIdentifier:identifyTPA()
From Party -> null-null-COMSTOR-Buyer To Party -> null-null-BTGS-Seller Collaboration -> 3A4
2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:872: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) RepoDataAccessor:getAgreementName(partyNAMES) Begin..
2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:872: Thread-13: B2B - (ERROR) Error -: AIP-50501: Trading partner agreement not found for the given input values: From party [NAME-ROLE] "COMSTOR-Buyer", To party [NAME-ROLE] "BTGS-Seller", Collaboration name "3A4"; also verify agreement effectiveToDate
     at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.RepoDataAccessor.getAgreementName(RepoDataAccessor.java:2133)
     at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAIdentifier.identifyTPA(TPAIdentifier.java:180)
     at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAProcessor.processTPA(TPAProcessor.java:589)
     at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAProcessor.processOutgoingTPA(TPAProcessor.java:221)
     at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine.processOutgoingMessage(Engine.java:1060)
     at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.data.MsgListener.onMessage(MsgListener.java:833)
     at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.data.MsgListener.run(MsgListener.java:400)
     at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:534)
2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:872: Thread-13: B2B - (ERROR) Error -: AIP-50501: Trading partner agreement not found for the given input values: From party [NAME-ROLE] "COMSTOR-Buyer", To party [NAME-ROLE] "BTGS-Seller", Collaboration name "3A4"; also verify agreement effectiveToDate
     at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.RepoDataAccessor.getAgreementName(RepoDataAccessor.java:2133)
     at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAIdentifier.identifyTPA(TPAIdentifier.java:180)
     at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAProcessor.processTPA(TPAProcessor.java:589)
     at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAProcessor.processOutgoingTPA(TPAProcessor.java:221)
     at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine.processOutgoingMessage(Engine.java:1060)
     at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.data.MsgListener.onMessage(MsgListener.java:833)
     at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.data.MsgListener.run(MsgListener.java:400)
     at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:534)
2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:872: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine:processOutgoingMessage B2BDomainException
2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:872: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine:handleOutboundException Updating Error Message: Error -: AIP-50501: Trading partner agreement not found for the given input values: From party [NAME-ROLE] "COMSTOR-Buyer", To party [NAME-ROLE] "BTGS-Seller", Collaboration name "3A4"; also verify agreement effectiveToDate
2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:872: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.msgproc.DbAccess:updateWireBusinessToErrorState Enter
2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:872: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.msgproc.DbAccess:updateWireBusinessToErrorState Wire message not found.
2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:888: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.msgproc.DbAccess:updateWireBusinessToErrorState Creating new business message
2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:888: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.msgproc.DbAccess:DbAccess:insertMsgTblRow Enter
2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:903: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.msgproc.DbAccess:DbAccess:insertMsgTblRow toparty name BTGS
2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:903: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.msgproc.DbAccess:DbAccess:insertMsgTblRow toparty type and value nullnull
2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:903: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.msgproc.DbAccess:DbAccess:insertMsgTblRow BusinessAction for the given name PurchaseOrderConfirmationAction BusinessAction_9516
2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:903: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.msgproc.DbAccess:updateWireBusinessToErrorState Creating new b2berror object
2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:903: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.msgproc.DbAccess:updateWireBusinessToErrorState Updating business message error information
2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:903: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.msgproc.DbAccess:updateWireBusinessToErrorState Exit
2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:903: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine:handleOutboundException Updating Native Event Tbl Row
2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:903: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.msgproc.DbAccess:DbAccess:updateNativeEvtTblRow Enter
2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:919: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.msgproc.DbAccess:
** DbAccess:updateNativeEvtTblRow:tip_wireMsg wiremsg not found
2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:919: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine:handleOutboundException notifying App
2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:919: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) Engine:notifyApp Enter
2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:919: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) Enqueue Engine AQJMSCorrelationID = 72E9465AA77D4B70A1D1F327F359E819
2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:919: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) notifyApp:notifyApp Enqueue the ip exception message:
<Exception xmlns="http://integration.oracle.com/B2B/Exception" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<correlationId>G20090304062204707.e44c79:11fcbe016e5:-7fdc@706519011</correlationId>
<b2bMessageId>G20090304062204707.e44c79:11fcbe016e5:-7fdc@706519011</b2bMessageId>
<errorCode>AIP-50501</errorCode>
<errorText>Trading partner agreement not found for the given input values: From party [NAME-ROLE] "COMSTOR-Buyer", To party [NAME-ROLE] "BTGS-Seller", Collaboration name "3A4"; also verify agreement effectiveToDate</errorText>
<errorDescription>
<![CDATA[Machine Info: (punin1879150986)
Description: Unable to identify the trading partner agreement from the given input values. Also verify agreement effectiveToDate
StackTrace:
Error -: AIP-50501: Trading partner agreement not found for the given input values: From party [NAME-ROLE] "COMSTOR-Buyer", To party [NAME-ROLE] "BTGS-Seller", Collaboration name "3A4"; also verify agreement effectiveToDate
     at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.RepoDataAccessor.getAgreementName(RepoDataAccessor.java:2133)
     at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAIdentifier.identifyTPA(TPAIdentifier.java:180)
     at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAProcessor.processTPA(TPAProcessor.java:589)
     at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAProcessor.processOutgoingTPA(TPAProcessor.java:221)
     at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine.processOutgoingMessage(Engine.java:1060)
     at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.data.MsgListener.onMessage(MsgListener.java:833)
     at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.data.MsgListener.run(MsgListener.java:400)
     at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:534)
]]>
</errorDescription>
<errorSeverity>2</errorSeverity>
</Exception>
2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:919: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) AQJMSCorrelationID = 72E9465AA77D4B70A1D1F327F359E819
2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:950: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) Engine:notifyApp Exit
2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:950: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine:handleOutboundException Updated the Error Message Successfully: Error -: AIP-50501: Trading partner agreement not found for the given input values: From party [NAME-ROLE] "COMSTOR-Buyer", To party [NAME-ROLE] "BTGS-Seller", Collaboration name "3A4"; also verify agreement effectiveToDate
2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:950: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) DBContext commit: Enter
2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:950: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) DBContext commit: Transaction.commit()
2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:950: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) DBContext commit: Leave
2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:950: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.data.MsgListener:onMessage Exit
Can you please look into this?
Regards,
Ravi Shah

Hi, I am using USB 8476s to communicate to a slave unit in LIN network using LabVIEW7.1. Can anyone tell me how i can send a header file plus 1 byte of data to the slave in a LIN network. or how do i use ldf file. i want to read responses from the slave

Hi, I am using USB 8476s to communicate to a slave unit in LIN network. Can anyone tell me how i can send a header frame plus 1 byte of data to the slave in a LIN network. or how do I communictae with slave using LabVIEW7.1.
I want to read responses from the slave. When i tried with labview exapmle programs or even using MAX also, while doing some switching action in my slave, i am getting response as Device inactive with timestamp but there is no data format.
And I have Lin Description File. Can you suggest me how to use ldf file.
I am at customer place and It would be great help from you if you can suggest me at the earliest. Thank you

you may use the LDF Starter Kit to use LDF informations in your application
http://joule.ni.com/nidu/cds/view/p/id/665/lang/en

Java Client throws exception while sending NTLMV2 Response from WIN7 to W

We have written a Java client which connects to a webservices application using NTLM authentication against Windows 2008 R2 Server (using IIS7). This program works fine when running from Windows XP, Linux but failing when running from Windows 7.
Error encountered is: java.io.IOException: Authentication failure.
Here is what we have written to connect to HTTPS with credential using SSLContext as mentioned below.
SSLContext sc = SSLContext.getInstance( "SSL" );
sc.init( null, trustAllCerts, new java.security.SecureRandom() );
HttpsURLConnection.setDefaultSSLSocketFactory( sc.getSocketFactory() );
( ( HttpsURLConnection )( m_oHttpURLConnection ) ).setHostnameVerifier( this );
URL url = new URL("https://testsite...");
HttpsURLConnection m_oHttpURLConnection = (HttpsURLConnection) url.openConnection();
Following properties are set to HttpsURLConnection:
RequestMethod : GET
InstanceFollowRedirects : true
AllowUserInteraction : true
UseCaches : false
DoOutput : true
DoInput : true
After setting all the above parameters the following code is used to set credentials data and connect to site
Authenticator.setDefault(new MyAuthenticator ());
m_oHttpURLConnection.connect();
After connection is successful request XML is sent to server and expecting a response from the server. So when the below line is called exception is thrown.
m_oHttpURLConnection.getResponseCode();
Exception :
java.io.IOException: Authentication failure
     at sun.net.www.protocol.http.HttpURLConnection.getInputStream(HttpURLConnection.java:1173)
     at java.net.HttpURLConnection.getResponseCode(HttpURLConnection.java:373)
     at sun.net.www.protocol.https.HttpsURLConnectionImpl.getResponseCode(HttpsURLConnectionImpl.java:318)
After changing LAN Manager Authentication level setting of Windows 7 from Send NTLMv2 response only to Send LM & NTLM use NTLMv2 session security if negotiated, application is working fine.
Local Security Settings àSecurity SettingsàLocal Policies à Security Optionsà Network security: LAN Manager Authentication level
By default in Windows Vista, Windows Server 2008, Windows 7, and Windows Server 2008 R2: Send NTLMv2 response only , Lowering the security level at the client end is bit risk and typically is not recommended.

this subforum is about Kerberos and GSS and not about NTLM. Why are you hasseling with NTLM? Take Kerberos.

Encrypted response from a SOAP Sender???

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for