Enhanced interface determination IN BPM

Hello experts,
Question is in the title.
I'm in PI 7.0 and i think it's not possible. Can you confirm it ?
Thank you for your responses.
Regards.

Yes ! ;o)
But, i have a scenario with BPM : file -> synchronous call bapi -> 2 split mapping (using enhanced interface determination) -> possibility 4 files.
It's not a problem for me, because i will 'stop' BPM afterthe Bapi call, but i have to create most CC.
It was just an quastion for me.
Thanks.

Similar Messages

Error with Enhanced Interface determination

Hi Experts,
In enhanced interface determination for message splitting w/o BPM, i have given the interface mapping.
But while testing the configuration.......... i am getiing an error at Interface Determination & Mapping which is not showing any processing log.
My mapping program works fine.
could anyone tell me where the problem is....

Hi,
Can you post the error message that you are getting....it will help experts solve your problem accurately.
Regards,
Abhishek.

Error in enhanced interface determination...

Hi All,
we have a file to file and to mail scenario.
We have created one sender CC , one file receiverCC and one MailCC.
In enhanced interface determination the respective interface mapings are specified .now the issue we are facing is if the processing of the file fails mail should not be sent.
but in our scenario even if the file processing fails the ail is being sent.
pls suggest wat might be the problem.
regards,

Hi,
In Receiver Determination, the File receiver and Mail Rceiver works independently.
There will not be such sequence maintained in Receiver determination that the failure of one receiver should affect to other one.
Although there is one option in Receiver determination that if the receiver determination get failed then you could stop the processing.
This will help you out.
If in case this will not work for you then BPM will the confirmed solution for it.
Thanks
Swarup

Enhanced Interface Determination in PI 7.1

Hi All,
My scenerio will work as follows
The changes in the process order will triggered by the client system .I will get the already converted XML file.I have used the file adapter in the sender side to pick the file.At the receiver side I am using the 3 custom BAPIs.I have used 3 message interface instead of multi-mapping as the inbound interfaces.
The Logic is like that:
If the Process order status is = 1 then call BAPI 1,if it 2 then call BAPI 2 & call BAPI 3.
Please tell me the following
1.Is there Enhanced Interface Detrmination option available in PI 7.1?If so then can I mention or call 2 BAPIs in one condition over there?Do I need to write ABAP condition?
2.Is Enhanced interface Determination possible when I have used 3 inbound interfaces instead of multi-mapping?
3.From my point of view I need the following in my scenerio
- 3 message mappings(Graphical Mappings),
- 3 interface mappings,
- 1 sender agreement,
- 1 receiver determination,
-1 interface determination(with 2 conditions in it),
-3 receiver agreements.
Am I right?
4.How many sender and receiver agreements do I need?
5.Do I need to go for Enhanced receiver determination?
Thanks in advance.

the same status node in the source file on which I will impose check will call the selective inbound interface based on the
status node.Is it?If so,then do I need to mention anything other than the check condition in XPATH e.g.do I need to mention any
mapping program or inbound interface (though I dont thing so but I am still confused) ?
Yes, apart from specifying the condition in the Condition Editor you also should mention the corresponding Inbound Service Interface and Interface Mapping (if any).
Condition will only cause the execution of that particular line and wont automatically call the mapping/ interface (unless these are specified in the Interface Determination).
Is XPATH the alternative option in condition editor which can be skipped though I would surely like to go through it as
much as possible?
XPATH is the easiest option to specify a condition....other option includes the use of a Context Object.
So as of now think that you cannot skip XPATH (for this particular requirement).
Once you become an expert in using a XPATH (which you can in a days period) you can try out for Context Objects.
Regarding Test Case:
There is no standard template for this.....i would suggest check with peers in your company.....many a times companies have their own templates for test cases alongwith the possible cases....then referring to those test cases you can build the cases for your scenario. Avoid a direct copy of the test cases.....many wont be relevant for your case.
Regards,
Abhishek.

Enhanced Interface Determination - does not work!

Hi guys,
well i have a scenario where i have done a multi mapping where MT_TYPSCH is generated for each new value which occurs in one special source field.
<NO>1</NO>
<NO>2</NO>
<NO>3</NO>
..so three MT will be generated.
Now i would like these messages devided to different Business Services where each one has on FTP-CC to write a file with a certain filename, e.g. File1.txt, File2.txt, File3.txt.
Therefore i thought i use different receivers in Receiver Determination with using Conditions and pointing to a value in field with XPATH. So depending on field <NO> the message should be routed to the given receiver targets.
I surely use the enhanced Interface Determination because i use multi mapping.
But when i run test, i receive 3 files with different names but same content. For me the receiver determination is not working that good.
Can someone help me on this?!
source:
<ZBC0>
<IDOC BEGIN="">
<EDI_DC40 SEGMENT="">
<ZBC0 SEGMENT=""> 0...9999
<NO>1</NO>
<TYPE>1B20-6</TYPE>
<SPEC>152J</SPEC>
</ZBC0>
<ZBC0 SEGMENT="1">
<NO>2</NO>
<TYPE>1B20-6</TYPE>
<SPEC>152J</SPEC>
</IDOC>
</ZBC0>
target:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<MT_TYPSCH> 1..1
<TYPSCHRecordSet> 1..1
<TYPSCHDetailsStruc> 1..unbounded
<FELD1/> {represents content of <No>}
<FELD2/>
<FELD3/>
</TYPSCHDetailsStruc>
</TYPSCHRecordSet>
</MT_TYPSCH>

Hi Mario,
ok here is my requirement.
We get ONE IDoc in which several items are listed. These have one field <NO> which can have the values 1,2 and 3. Depending on this value the items should be collected and written to different files on FTP.
My approach is that i divide all the items in mapping in different Message Types. This MT should be routet to different business services which has one CC to write on FTP.
To get the items with e.g. <NO>1</NO> i took condition in reciever determination using xpath. ((/ZBC21/IDOC/ZBC21/NO = 1).
So depending on the mapping everything runs - in my point of view but the different messages are not routed to the different services to write them to different files.
Source
<ZBC0>
<IDOC BEGIN="">
<EDI_DC40 SEGMENT="">
<ZBC0 SEGMENT=""> 0...9999
<NO>1</NO>
<TYPE>1B20-6</TYPE>
<SPEC>152J</SPEC>
</ZBC0>
<ZBC0 SEGMENT="1">
<NO>2</NO>
<TYPE>1B20-6</TYPE>
<SPEC>152J</SPEC>
</IDOC>
</ZBC0>
target:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<MT_TYPSCH> 1..1
<TYPSCHRecordSet> 1..1
<TYPSCHDetailsStruc> 1..unbounded
<FELD1/> {represents content of <NO>}
<FELD2/>
<FELD3/>
</TYPSCHDetailsStruc>
</TYPSCHRecordSet>
</MT_TYPSCH>
The output should be files with content of items depending on field <NO>.
file1.txt (all items with <NO>1</NO>)
file2.txt
file3.txt
I hope i made it clearer!
br

Enhanced Interface Determination for IDOCs

Hi All,
I've a query on the usage of Enhanced Interface Determination for IDocs.
I've to create IDocs based on the condition in the Message Mapping i.e. say if recordtype in the source is A then IDoc1 should be created and if recordtype is B then IDoc2 should be created.
Is it possible to use Enhanced Interface Determination to achieve this??.. Because I was told by someone that Enhanced Interface Determination can't be used for IDoc based scenarios though am using External Definitions for the mapping purpose. Please clarify.
Thanks in advance
Regards,
Joe.

Hi Sridhar/ Bhavesh,
Thanks for your prompt reply. I think I wasn't clear in my previous post.
The scenario is the input file has three different record types (3 different structures) and the IDocs should be created based on the record type. I don't think I can use the condition based scenario as the record types are totally different. Please suggest.
Thanks,
Joe.

Abap proxy with attachments in enhanced interface determination/mapping

Hi guys.
We were receiving a abap proxy from ECC with a pdf attached in the header.
This was the scenario PROXY ---> FILE
We used the PayloadSwapBean Module in a Receiver File Adapter to get this document and put it in a FTP Server.
Now we have to make and improvement in the scenario and we have to generate two receiver interfaces so the scenario looks like this:
PROXY ---> FILE and JDBC.
So we have to use an enhanced interface mapping and an enhanced interface determination.
The problem is that with this enhanced interface determination/mapping the attached document is lost.
Any solution?
Thanks a lot.
Regards.

> The problem is that with this enhanced interface determination/mapping the attached document is lost.
I know there was an issue in early PI 7.1 SP versions. maybe you find a bug fix for this?
Otherwise report to SAP.

Extended receiver and enhanced interface determination

Hi,
Can somebody list me the business cases when we use the extended receiver and enhanced interface determination.In which scenarios we have to use them?
Where we can use these features and whom they can replace?
Regards,
Anoop

Hi Anoop
have alook at thses URl's also
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/43/01322a7af25285e10000000a1553f7/frameset.htm
:Dynamic file and variable substitution
Similarly Extended Receiver determination is used to determine the receiver at runtime.
Refer my reply:Re: Condition In Receiver Determination Not Working
enhancement in ID
Enhanced Receiver Determination:
You use an enhanced receiver determination to have a mapping program determine the receivers of the message dynamically at runtime. Instead of creating the receivers in the receiver determination manually, you assign a mapping to the receiver determination and this returns a list of receivers at runtime.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/43/a5f2066340332de10000000a11466f/content.htm
Enhanced (Mapping-Based) Interface Determination
In an enhanced interface determination you do not enter the inbound interfaces manually, but instead first select a multi-mapping. You get the inbound interfaces from the target interfaces of the multi-mapping. The inbound interfaces are determined at runtime during the mapping step.
You typically use an enhanced interface determination if the source message has an element with occurrence 0 ... unbounded (for multiple items of a data record) and you want multiple messages (for the individual items) to be generated at runtime.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/42/ed364cf8593eebe10000000a1553f7/frameset.htm
<b>enhanced interface determination</b>
/people/robin.schroeder/blog/2006/11/15/using-dynamic-receiver-determination-with-sync-interface
/people/venkataramanan.parameswaran/blog/2006/03/17/illustration-of-enhanced-receiver-determination--sp16
List of receivers can be dyamically determined and assigned at runtime using enhanced receiver determination .
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/43/a5f2066340332de10000000a11466f/content.htm
Thanks
Pls reward if useful

Enhanced Interface Determination gives Empty Payload

Hi,
I am using Enhanced Interface Determination in my scenario.
1:3 Message Types(Interfaces).
The thing is that split occurs, but after Message Mapping I get empty Payloads..
I am using External Definitions instead of Message types.
Another question: Can there be multiple dynamic confgiurations during splits. i.e one Dynamic Configuration for each message split.
Note: testing the Interface mapping from IR with payload from MONI gives proper output.
Regards,
Sundar.

Hi All,
I copied the entire XML which i used for testing in Interface Mapping which i should not have....
I gave as
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<ns0:Messages xmlns:ns0="http://sap.com/xi/XI/SplitAndMerge">
   <ns0:Message1>
      <ns1:SAP_HR_MT xmlns:ns1="http://com.cognizant/sapr3/all">
         <Participant>....
                     </Participant>
         <Dependent>
            ....         </Dependent>
         <Coverage>
            ....         </Coverage>
      </ns1:SAP_HR_MT>
   </ns0:Message1>
</ns0:Messages>
But the input should have been
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
      <ns1:SAP_HR_MT xmlns:ns1="http://com.cognizant/sapr3/all">
         <Participant>....
                     </Participant>
         <Dependent>
            ....         </Dependent>
         <Coverage>
            ....         </Coverage>
      </ns1:SAP_HR_MT>
now the output is perfectly coming....:-)
Regards,
Sundar )

Integration Scenario for Enhanced Interface determination

Hello Friends,
I am modeling the integration scenario for 1:N Mapping case, that is 1 outbound Interface and 3 inbound Interfaces. I am finding difficultly in modeling the integration scenario for enhanced interface determination.
Kindly provide me inputs in configuring this case.
Thanks

Have you look this help?
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/42/ed364cf8593eebe10000000a1553f7/frameset.htm
2.      Integration Directory: Define the interface determination.
Note the following:
○     The outbound interface of the multi-mapping must be entered as the sender interface in the key of the interface determination.
○     The interface determination type must be set to Enhanced.
○     Select the multi-mapping you defined previously from the Integration Repository.
To select the interface mapping, use the input help ().
The target interfaces of the interface mapping are displayed in the Inbound Interfaces frame.
The number of messages (for an inbound interface) created in the mapping step is displayed in the Occurrence column.

Question related to enhanced interface determination option in ID

HI All,
I am trying to create a 1:N message mapping and here are the steps which I have done.
1. Created a Source Data type, Message type , Message Interface and activated
2. Created 3 Target Data types, 3 Message types and 3 Message interfaces and activated.
3. Created a Message mapping and Interface Mappings in Message interface and activated.
While creating the configuration(ID) i have to use the enhanced interface determination but my interface mapping is not getting reflected in the popup.
All of the above objects are created in a Customer Specific software components but however if i create the Message Mapping and Interface Mapping in SCV SAP_BASIS and Namespace http://sap.com/xi/XI/System then i am able to select the interface mapping through enhanced interface determination option during configuration.
What i wanted to know is do I need to create the Interface mapping in SCV SAP_BASIS instead of Customer Specific SCV.
Regards,
Swaroop

Which version of PI are you working on?We develop objects in customer SWC not SAP Basis.
Create Interface determination and add 3 operation mappings by using + button , write a condition if you required.I hope you created one Bussiness compoenent for Target.

Acknowledgments in scenario having enhanced interface determination

Dear Experts,
I have noticed that in case of Idoc sender scenarios where PI is having an enhanced interface determination, the acknowledgments are not sent back to R/3. Is this something standard or is there a way to enable the acknowledgements in these case.
Regards
Varun

Hello,
Is this something standard or is there a way to enable the acknowledgements in these case.
You can enable/disable acknowledgement by running report IDX_NOALE. From there filter the sender port/client and then click execute. You can then turn on/turn off acknowledgements for idocs sent from that port.
Hope this helps,
Mark

Enhanced Interface Determination?

Hi All,
I have a scenario where i need to do a header validation . if validation succeeds i have to map source to target data and sent to SAP system. if validation fails i need to map source to error data and sent it to MQ system.
I am using enhanced receiver determination for selecting proper receiver based on the header validation. but in this case inspite of failed header validation there is no error message in SXMB_MONI...
what i wanted is that when header validation fails , error message should be displaced in moni and also a error message (xml ) should be sent to MQ system.
for implemention the above mentioned feature , i took another message mapping and interface mapping where i am explicitly throwing error -- Repository work.
In configuration , i just create one more receiver determination with new message type and in existing interface determination , i added the additional interface mapping ( throwing error ).
due to above changes , i am getting three message in Moni.. if header validation fails.
1. which indicated that there is message splitting.
2. one successful message ( source to error xml file ) to be sent to MQ system.
3. error message where i am explicitly throwing error .
can we have a situation where we have only one error message in moni and also the error is sent to MQ system?..
i guess there is some feature in interface determination.. what is enhaced interface determination..
I hope i am clear with my requirement..
Ranjeet Singh...

Have a look
/people/robin.schroeder/blog/2006/11/15/using-dynamic-receiver-determination-with-sync-interface
/people/venkataramanan.parameswaran/blog/2006/03/17/illustration-of-enhanced-receiver-determination--sp16
List of receivers can be dyamically determined and assigned at runtime using enhanced receiver determination .
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/43/a5f2066340332de10000000a11466f/content.htm
Thanks

Enhanced Receceiver Determination and BPM

Hi Expert,
Based on some conditions in the input file I need to route it to BPM or file receiver? Please let me know if I can use enhanced receiver determination?
Thanks
Suma

My scenario is actually soap to rfc synchronous...
I want to check if in soap request the fields are having blank value.
case1 : If the input fields are having blank value then I need not call the RFC and I have to sent the response as Fields are missing.
case2 : If the fields are not having blank value then I need to check whether XI is able to connect to R/3. If XI is not able to connect to R/3 then I need to send the soap response as "R/3 server is down". This one am doing with BPM using exceptions.
case 3: when fields are not blank and XI is able to connect to R/3 then call rfc and send soap response to third party
How can I validate step1?
Thanks
Suma S

BPM interface determination error

Hi All,
i have BPM scenario. scenario like three files coming from the sender once picking the all file i have to merge these file based on the common filed in three files.
for this i used correlation in BPM
i followed the below steps:
1) i creatd three out bound service interfaces for the sender three files
2) one inbound service interface for the receiver.
3) four abstract service interfaces for the BPM.
5) Operation mapping between the abstract interfaces.
ID objects creation :
imported the integration process in ID from IR.
communication componets created for the sender & receiver
4 receiver determinations created 3 RD between Sender bussiness component & BPM ,1 RD between BPM & receiver business component
4 Interfaces determinastion created as per as RD
3 sender agreements
1 receiver agreement
while testing i got this error in SXMB_MONI
RCVR_DETERMINATION">CX_RD_PLSRV</SAP:Code>
<SAP:P1>Problem while determining receivers using interface mapping: No operation with XML root tag
i got confusion while creatin the Interfaces Determination i.e weather do we need mention Operation mapping between outbound service interface & abstract service interface
please correct what is the correct process to create the Interface determination in BPM like this scenario.
thanks in advance

Are you doing any content conversion in Sender file Adapter then check whether the Flat file properly converted to XML file or not?
You need to create Interface determination but if source and target interface message type is same then no need to specify operation mappinhg in Interface determiination.
So interface determination should be there without any operation mapping

Enhanced interface determination IN BPM

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for