Enhancing 2LIS_04_P_ARBPL for STATUS of Operation

Hi,
I need the status of the operations of the production orders.
NOT the status of the production order head(Thats in the attributes of the 0PRODORDER)
I thought on enhancing the Datasource 2LIS_04_P_ARBPL for the statusfields.
As I see, the status comes from the table JEST.
Any Ideas how to select the status from JEST in a routine?
So that I enhance the datasource and fill the field via a routine.?
Or is there any other way to get the status of the operations into BI?
We are already loading the table AFRU via a VIEW into BI - could I include the status into this View?
Thanks

Hi,
If you just need the confirmation counter, that I guess is the number of Confirmation that happens after the TECO at the R/3 side (I guess you can check the same at the R3 side using Report COOIS). Have you considered the option of managing the same at the reporting level.
At the Bex level you can get the number of confirmation (Counter) for a period. This can be achieved by multiple ways, the simples one is
- Create one formula (while creation of formula give 1 in the Formula box then go to Aggregation tab in the formula then select reference infoobject as confirmation number then save, it will work)
1 = Numeric one constant in the formula
go to calculation tab then select as sum or total .
There is another way please check
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/index?rid=/library/uuid/009819ab-c96e-2910-bbb2-c85f7bdec04a
Regards,

Similar Messages

User Status Profile for Process Order Operations

Hello Experts.
I have a need to set up a User Status at the Process Order Operation level that will prevent operation confirmation when the status is Active .
I have been successful at the following:
   --- Created a new Status Profile (transaction BS02),
   --- Creating a u201CHoldu201D status,
   --- Defined the Influence on Business Transactions,
   --- Set the allowed Object Types for the profile.
   --- In an individual Process Order operation, I can now select the Status Profile, and set the Hold status, and it functions correctly.
My problem is that I canu2019t figure out how to set my new profile as a default for Process Order Operations. For Production Orders, this is done in the IMG definition for the Order Type (transaction OPJH), updating field T003O-VRG_STSMA. However the Order Type definition for Process orders (transaction CORN) only has a field for a status profile at the header level. Iu2019ve searched through Configuration and the Recipe, and the Production Version, and the Control Key, but can find no where to set the default status profile for a Process Order Operation..
As a final desperate act, I manually edited a T003O record for a Process Order Type in our test system, but even this failed to set a default Operation Status Profile for subsequently created Process Orders.
If you have any knowledge about this, then please help.

As of this date, we have still not implemented a fix, but I did get some information from someone else who has.
I'll post his information here for all to see. Hope you find it helpful.
From: Joe
Yes we managed to do it.
After several false starts and CMOD/projects which suffered because only the default keys (for order number, aufpl etc) were in place and not the actual, we coded up the IN_UPDATE method in the WORKORDER_UPDATE badi. This gives us the final format after the DB save (but before the commit). The update of the STATUS using the SAP std function module was actioned successfully but the status profile was not actually passed through. We assumed that this was because of the update task - so we introduced an INSERT into JSTO instead (a bit naughty I know, but desperate needs etc). If you require anything more let me know.
Best Regards
Joe

Opportunity Search for Status NE (is not) is not supported by SAP Standard

Hi experts,
due to wiki entry
Searching for business transactions in the web ui using the Status criteria - CRM - SCN Wiki
the opportunity search for a status with operator NE is not supported.
Is there any SAP proposal for an appropriate workaround?
Thank you and best regards
Vanessa

Hello Vanessa,
This is a fresh development for my current customer which is not yet completely tested. The last customer had the same requirement, created an OSS-message for it, SAP told him in standard it is not possible and gave up. I think I already heard that too many selection parameters are not supported but I haven't seen it yet in our project. But I have seen that with mabye 100000 excluded transactions there is a time out.
The alternative would be to create a sub-class of the GENIL-class (I think this is CL_CRM_QOPP_RUN_BTIL in your case - search for CL*OPP*IL* ) where the SQL-statement is triggered and redefine the relevant method (which is normally GET_DYNAMIC_QUERY_RESULT) and enhance the SQL-statement. Somewhere is customizing you have to replace the original class with the new class afterwards but right now I don't know where. I have not yet done this from scratch and I need to investigate this a little bit further.
The second alternative would be to modify the select statements in a BADI. I guess it is CRM_BADI_RF_Q1O_READ. But there I only the the possibility to change the STATUS_COMMON-criteria to OBJECT_ID criterias as still STATUS_COMMON NE is not supported in the SQL-statement of the GENIL-class.
Best regards,
Thomas

You have insufficient privileges for the current operation-Getting error running OAF page in R12

I have a custom OAF page in R11 which is working fine.
Same page is giving below errors in R12.
Any suggestions how to resolve this issue..please advice.
[167]:STATEMENT:[fnd.framework.webui.OAPageSecurity]:MAC validation status = false
[167]:STATEMENT:[fnd.framework.webui.OAPageSecurity]:Request parameters validation status = false
[167]:ERROR:[fnd.framework.webui.OAPageSecurity]:You cannot run a page which is not SelfSecured when the MAC fails.
[169]:ERROR:[fnd.common.Message.auto_log]:FNDFND_INSUFF_PRIVILEGES
[169]:ERROR:[fnd.framework.OAException]:You have insufficient privileges for the current operation. Please contact your System Administrator.
[170]:EVENT:[fnd.framework.webui.OAPageContextImpl]:OAF LOG: Event : Redirect Page, in: oracle.apps.fnd.framework.webui.OAPageContextImpl: OA.jsp?akRegionCode=FNDDIALOGPAGE&akRegionApplicationId=0&transactionid=817211813&oapc=10&oas=YyMjRI6buFwrYehD8b25iQ..&retainAM=Y&addBreadCrumb=S&OAMC=G
[170]:PROCEDURE:[fnd.profiles.Profiles]:getProfileOptionValue: name=JTF_PF_MASTER_ENABLED; levelID=10001; levelValue=0; levelValueApplID=0
[170]:EVENT:[jtf.activity.CorePageObject]: PATBE START currentPageObject : PAT STATUS:false
[170]:EVENT:[jtf.activity.CorePageObject]: PATBE END currentPageObject : return factory.dummyProxyUser():
[322]:EXCEPTION:[fnd.framework.webui.OAPageBean]:java.lang.NullPointerException
Thanks in Advance
Sridevi K

Hi Sridevi,
The custom page is a selfsecured page?
ie, it will be accessed without login?
What is the profile option fnd_debuging_level 's value set to.
I Could see one your other thread
Re: You have insufficient privileges for the current Operation error
you mentioned that you did tried setting the profile options
Framework Validation Level
FND Function Validation LEvel
FND Validation Level
to none, still you are facing the issue,
At what level you tried the profile options.
Thanks,
With regards,
Kali.
OSSi.

Creating Enhancement Implementation for the Enhancement spot in ECC 6.0

Hi All,
I have an urgent requirement of creating an Enhancement implementation for the existing Enhancement Spot in ECC 6.0 ..
I never worked on enhancement in ECC 6.0.
There is an existing enhancement spot called "ES_SAPLIQS0" in the package " IWOC". which has got three existing implementations
1. DI_ROT_SAPLIQS0
2. ISU_SAPLIQS0
3. DIMP_GENERAL_SAPLIQS0
I need to create another implementation for the same enhancement spot.. Please let me know the detailed procedure to create the enhancement implementation for the same spot..
Thanks-
Shrikant
useful answers will be rewarded.

First of all find out the include program where you want to write the logic.. Click the spiral button to go to enhancement mode.. then click on Edit > Enhancement operations> Show implicit enhancement points.
This will hightlight all the enhancement points in your include program. Right click on exact enhancement point and select Enhancement Implementations --> Create,, It should give you the same Enhancement spot you are talking about. select that and write the code.. This code will be automatically appear in the same enhancement spot. You can see one more Enhancement implementation in the same Enhancement spot from the transaction code se19.
Hope my explanation is clear, if you have any doubts, send me a mail at [email protected]
All the best.
Shrikant

Inspection lot status per operation

hi,
Is there an overview in SAP to get the status of an inspection lot per operation (other than QE51N). I've an operation for each laboratory. I'd like to get an overview of the status per operation. If not which tables should i use?
Thanks.

Use Bapi : BAPI_PRODORD_GET_DETAIL
or
Table : TJ02T along with JSTO & JEST
Refer
Operation status of the production order

Enhancement implementation for enhancement spot DPR_EVENTS

Hi. SAP Export.
I created an enhancement implementation for enhancement spot DPR_EVENTS, and set the filter value equal to ON_TTO_IN_PROCESS, it means the code executed when user set system status to u2018IN PROCESSu2019.
I added my code to do some logical check in the method IF_EX_DPR_EVENTS~ON_EVENT, if the check failed. I can show an error message on the cProjects, BUT I CAN STILL SAVE THE DATA with ERROR. It looks like the error message is not useful.
Could some one please kindly help with provide a solution to solve this issue?

Can you please elaborate, what exactly is the requirement? Do you want that the message should be displayed as warning & processing should continue or something else?

How to view Work process status from Operating System level???

Hi,
How can I check work process status from Operating System in Unix. For example : In Windows, I can see the work process status from SAP MMC in WP Table.
How can I view from Unix?
Appreciate your feedback. Thanks.

Hi,
You can terminate. Please look into the menu given by DPMON carefully. You can kill the process using the k option.
Otherwise you can also kill the process kill -9 <PID of the process>.
Please do not terminate update and ENQ work process. This may lead to data loss. If the condition can not be control by killing some processes and again all the WPs are occupied. I recommend SAP system restart.
Restart will ensure that all necessary roll backs happen and no data loss.
With Regards,
Saurabh

Status control table - 'Perform update for status control table for cube '

Hello Experts,
While loading data to DSO, I am getting this message - 'Perform update for status control table for cube Z3MLQUA'.
What is status control table ? and can I have some inputs as to how to solve this issue
Regards,
arjun

Hi,
This message is not a issue in itself. It is just a SAP message which means that the system is checking/updating the system tables to carry out the operation whether it can be done or not.
If your loads are failing at this step or after this message there can be many reasons, check some of the possible reasons below
Performing check and potential update for status control table
Update from PSA error in Process Chain
problem in deleting request
Reporting not available ,even if Data is sucessfully loaded into DT
Hope this helps,
Kush kashyap

Performance check for status control table

Hi,
When ever we activate any ODS or delete the request ,a message 'Performance Check for Status control Table ' appears.
What does it mean?Please explain what is status control table and how it performs?
Thanks & Regards,
Dinakar.

Hi,
This message is not a issue in itself. It is just a SAP message which means that the system is checking/updating the system tables to carry out the operation whether it can be done or not.
If your loads are failing at this step or after this message there can be many reasons, check some of the possible reasons below
Performing check and potential update for status control table
Update from PSA error in Process Chain
problem in deleting request
Reporting not available ,even if Data is sucessfully loaded into DT
Hope this helps,
Kush kashyap

User defined fields for PM order operation

I want to restrict the users from changing the object (Key word for User defiened fields) in the Enhancement tab of PM order Operations.
I have created one object (TCode OPEC) by configuring the required fields. Created one authorisation object by considering SLWID (Key word for User defiened fields) and activity type fields and assigned the same to the Object in the authorisation object field. Activity type values restricted to display only.
I have checked the user exit IWO10018 for the same but while changing the Key word for User defiened fields, it is not hitting the same user exit (i checked by debugging)
Still Key word field is getting changed without checking any authorisation. Can anybody give the solution for the same.

hi ramesh
i think you can assign the screen and tranaction variants in the SHD0 T code itself,selet the standard variant tab ,in that select variant groups in that you can assign to the user
regards
thyagarajan

Tag for status alert

Is there a way to disable Tag for status alert on clients?

Hi Toolshed,
I did some research and found still no way to disable this feature.
Some similar threads for your reference.
https://social.technet.microsoft.com/forums/lync/en-US/ef21869b-eede-4076-a8d2-0c506d5b7f34/turn-off-tagging-for-status-change-alerts
https://social.technet.microsoft.com/forums/lync/en-US/46562ad6-95ff-4045-ad90-381b552592fa/turn-off-tag-for-status-change-alerts-globally
In addition, You can have a look at the “Lync Server enhanced presence privacy mode” ,
with enhanced presence privacy mode, users can restrict their presence information so that it is visible only to the contacts listed in their Lync 2013 Contacts list.
Best regards,
Eric
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]

WCS difference between "admin status" and "oper status"

Can anyone explain what the difference is between admin status and oper status within the WCS GUI. It appears that disbaling either on effectively disables the radio...is that correct?

I think I got it figured out...thanks for lookin....

IPC control for added rework operations

Dear Experts,
Can you please, help me with the following case:
I have a production order and IPC control for certain operations.
The system has created an inspection lot (03).
During the results recording (with operation confirmation) one piece is reported to be for rework.
The trigger point was activated and a new operation for rework was added to the production order.
The new operation for rework also has an inspection point (the same as in the production order - freely defined, no quantity or time dependency) and also has a quality characteristic.
My expectation was that after the new operation has appeared in the production order either the created inspection lot should be updated for the new operation and its characteristic or a new inspection lot should be created for the new operation.
However nothing happened - where did I go wrong or what is missing?
I will gladly supply additional information on demand.
Looking forward to hearing from you,
Rumi

either the created inspection lot should be updated for the new operation
This is not possible in std SAP ,As Once lot is created it will not updated automatically after changes made in the task list or routing etc.
new inspection lot should be created for the new operation.
This will also not possible because lot is already created for the said Qty in Production order.
Now what remains is if you have not taken UD of the existing lot & status of the Inspection lot is REL then,
go to QA02>enter lot number->click on Reset sample--->save
Now status of lot will become CRTD.
Now again go to QA02>enter lot number->click on inspection specification>click on sample>save
check the status .It should be REL & here you can see the new operation attached to the task list.

How do I clone a fully operational system that relies on Windows 7 for the underlying operating system?

I'm a retired IT professional desiring to assist a friend who owns a small business who recently experienced very malicious attacks on her computers from unknown parties operating anonymously on the Internet. Because
of her lack of preparation for such events, her future ability to continue to conduct her business was seriously threatened. The incident revealed, to my friend, the need to be prepared to deal with spontaneously occurring problems that create suspicious conditions
that arise with modern computer software before they can be analyzed in a sufficiently comprehensive manner to have an opinion regarding the appropriate course of action for obtaining a permanent remedy. In that, the ability to quickly react on the basis of
only suspicion is the goal.
I want to recommend an approach that involves maintaining an offline image of an operational system that is capable of running any of her computers. This image needs to include all of the software required to run
her business. In that, it is not limited to the operating system. This single image could then be used to restore any computer to a known reliable state should the need arise. This technique will also insure that each computer has sufficiently similar capability
to allow them to substitute for each other. Insofar as image restoration is itself an operation susceptible to causing unacceptable business delay I'm also recommending that each of the identical computers (i.e., from a hardware perspective) operate in a multi-boot
environment where a virtually offline backup can be instantiated via a simple reboot (i.e., an operation that all users of the Windows operating systems turn to when strange behavior is first observed). My intention is to limit the cloned system (i.e., partition
or C: drive) to the operational software. The business data along with storage for temporary data will be isolated on other partitions (i.e, mounted with other drive letters) accessible by each instance of the software eligible for multi-boot operation.
This kind of operation is something that I know how to setup on older versions of the Windows operating system. However, Microsoft has now dropped support for all of those operating systems and my much more limited
experience with the currently supported operating systems reveals that changes to the boot process will necessitate making changes to the specific preparations needed to build such an environment.
Before recommending that my friend replace all of her computers with new ones, that includes paying for new operating system (i.e., Windows) licenses, I need some assurance that the new operating systems are as
good as the old ones in this respect. These need to be relatively inexpensive desktop computers and we're only talking about a few of them. Let's say fewer than half a dozen. My friend is a sole proprietor and even though her business has become completely
dependent on what was once called personal computers she must operate on a fairly tight budget. This especially includes the budget for technology.
The articles I've been able to find on the Microsoft support websites seem to treat multi-boot as a situation where someone is running different versions of possibly difference operating systems whereas my need
to produce a single image that will both run on multiple computers as well as multiple partitions on the same computer. I'd appreciate finding some technical advice that applies to building such a system using a supported version of Windows.

I tried the image creation/restoration described by Jared. I don't think it makes much sense to rely on an operational system to do such a restoration therefore I opted for method 3 which involves using a "System Repair Disk". My first
reaction is what a crude tool. The image creation process had no trouble putting the image on a simple network share. However, it appeared as though the restoration couldn't even connect with the device. I then copied the files to a USB drive.
In this case the repair disk said it couldn't find the files even though they were there. It offered no mechanism to even look and see what was there. It appears as though it will only find the image if it is located in a folder by the certain
name used on creation and it is in root directory. Not very handy.
As ugly as all that was when we finally come to the point of making the restore it looks like the only option is to restore the entire disk, which in my case would mean also restoring both the windows partition and the recovery partition. This just
isn't what I want to do. It is also something I wouldn't even consider doing unless it was the only possible way to recover from a failed hard drive.
In summary, unless I've completely failed to notice how it works that just isn't going to work.
I hope there is something better than this. What about WinPE and ImageX?
Absent anything useful from Microsoft it will be necessary to try using other software. Time to try Acronis! I guess.

Enhancing 2LIS_04_P_ARBPL for STATUS of Operation

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for