Enhancing LBWE for not allowed fields

Hi All,
Has anyone ever tried to enhance LBWE structures for filling fileds which are not allowed status (F) in TMCEXCFS table.
We need to report deliveries which are not invoiced status A)yet. So we need to enhance 2LIS_12_VCITM with VBUP-FKSTA field. I know it is possible with appending structure to the extractor and filling it via ABAP code. But field status is F in the TMCEXCFS table.
Thank you very much.

Hi,
I dont think you need to alter TMCEXCFS table.
You can just do it the usual way as of creating an uppend structure to your datasource structure and populating the field via CMOD.
There's been a lot of topics on the issue.
For example you can refer to
LOGISTIC COCKPIT - WHEN YOU NEED MORE - First option: enhance it !

Similar Messages

BAPI Program -Invoice_update- For not allowing MIRO if Quality not clear

Hello Gurus,
Does anybody have program done for BAPI -Invoice Update
This is for not allowing user to post MIRO-Vendor Incoming Invoice Creation & Posting if any material against that PO or GR is lying in the Quality Inspection.
Please send if you have the same.
Thanks
Rahul

hi,
You can use user exit --EXIT_SAPLMRMP_010 (LMR1M001) which definitely will solve ur issue.
revert to me if u have any doubts on it.
murali.c

Reason for not allowing static declarations inside an inner class

Is the reason for not allowing static declarations inside an inner class is due to the fact that it can never be accessed at a class level as the outer class has to create an instance of the inner class and any attributes/methods of the inner class has to be accessed through that.
Typically, an instance (non-static) variable can never be accessed in a statement or expression inside a static context but the class variable can be accessed inside a non-static context. Given this, shouldnt the static declarations be allowed inside an inner class?
Correct me if my understanding is wrong.
Thanks

I still couldnt get it clearly. Why i cant i have a static value ( variable ) for all the instances of the inner class irrespective of its enclosing instances of it ( i.e outer class instances). Say in this example below,
class Outer
static int i = 0;
public Inner inner = new Inner();
class Inner // inner class ( non-static nested class )
int j = 0;
static final int k = 2; // compile time constants are allowed
// ininner class
public void m1()
j++;
System.out.println("j is " + j);
i++
System.out.println("i is " + i);
public static void main(String[] arg)
Outer outer1 = new Outer();
outer1.inner.m1(); // j will be 1 & i will be 1
Outer outer2 = new Outer();
outer2.inner.m1() // j will be 1 again & i will be 2. But I would
// want j to be 2. Why is this not allowed?
Looks like something missing..

Status Profile for not allowing UD before RR

Hi Experts
I have customized a User Status Profile not to allow UD if no RR is done.
But how ever in the case where I go to UD and try to do a UD for the lot which has not been RR it will give me status check error. So I cancel the error window and goes out of UD transaction. But while going out of UD transaction the system asks a "Confirmation Prompt 'Do you want to save your data first' "
If Yes is pressed the system saves the UD transaction (ofcourse with out a UD code) with Inspection Lot system status ICCO which will not allow the changing of results later.
How to over come this saving of Inspection lot and changing the status ?
Thanks
Jomy

Dear VRMP
When there is a status profile which will block UD without RR and still you try to give UD and try to save the RR gets locked. Please note that UD is not given for the lot.the status of the lot will be REL ICCO. The reason being systems automaticaly updated that inspection is completed
I have come across this issue. I have not found a solution for this. But i have found how to unlock the inspection completion
Go to QA11> Go to menu button EDIT> Reset > Inspection Completion> go to Edit again> Reset > Short term inspection > save> refresh the lot
Now the status of the lot will change from REL ICCO to REL CALC. You can now do the RR & give the UD
Hope i am clear now
Regards
gajesh

Check For not allowing Subcontracting PO creation against the ROH Items

Dear Sir,
We are looking for help on the following scenario :
For PO Creation , in the Item Category we type blank for "Standard PO" and L for "Subcontracting PO" . We intend to put a check so that users are not able to create the PO for Subcontracting against the Material type "ROH" . Rather Subcontracting PO must be allowed only for the Material having the type as "HALB" .
Kindly guide me on the above scenario please .
Regards
B Mittal

Dear mittal ,
You can do this. create a separate document type in IMG>MM>PURCHASING>PURCHASE ORDER>DEFINE DOCU TYPES. Set the allowed item categories for the document type as only standard. Now raise the purchase order for ROH using this document type. Now in case if you set the item category "L" system will throw an error.
try this if it satisfies you. reward if any.
yuvi.

Userexit for not allowing release order qnty greater than contr targt qnty

hi,
I posted the same mail before, but it seems we cannot do it in configuration..plz provide me a suitable User exit for the same..
When i am creating a release order for a quantity contract, the system is allowing to save the doc if at all the quantity is more than in the contract, i.e. if the user changes the quantity in release order more than the contract quantity, the system is issuing a warning message and allowing to save.(mess no V1 501)
I want to change this warning to an error message..
I checked in OVAH but only V4 messages are available there..
In SE91 i am able to see the message but there is no way for any change..
Thanks,
Sam

hi Sadhu Kishore,
In VTAA..from qnty contract to sales order in item level document flow is updated...the following is assigned there
Create doc. flow records except for dely/goods issue/billdoc
I searched some previous threads of the same characteristics, so everybody is telling the solution will be a user exit...
plz help reg thiss
Thanks,
Sam

Is firefox responsible for not allowing me to check the box in java to enable me to delete the cache,, I cannot check that box

while playing the pogo game site, I keep getting a server error message . pogo says to empty java cache. when I go to java program and find the correct delete page, there are 3 boxes to check. the first already is checked, the second is the empty cache box, but I cannot put a check in it...won't allow me to. is this a firefox problem? I cannot find a solution on the java site

when u click on the link in your first message, and go down towards the bottom to #2 their are 3 choices, each with a box to check....I am talking about the second box down to delete cache apps...it is a box that i am supposed to put a check in and it wont allow me to

Not allow to debug.

Hello, everybody.
I know that what I wants goes against open-code ABAP' spirit, but there are people I hace dependence of who are over me, telling me to do (just for eco reasons):
Is it there any way for not allowing to debug a program o a piece of coding?
Thanks you all.

Hi santiago,
1. One simple way
2. In program attributes,
<b>specify STATUS as 'System Program'</b>
3. 'System Programs' cannot be debugged.
(just see F1 help on this field in se38 - attributes)
regards,
amit m.

Unique Constraint Not Allowed in OA Table design?

Is it really true or is just my OApps Admin /DBA is just plain stupid for not allowing unique constraint at table level?
I have to implement a EO attribute level validation that does a select on an unindexed field thru the List Validator feature.
The problem is it is taking 40-60 seconds to commit something to the EO.

Thats true, if talking about only OAF, you don't need the constraint as you can handle that in code!
--Mukul

I lost my itunes after syncing and older iphone to my powermac g4. Originally I had an older ipod nano that I would sync to the g4 and everything was fine. Lost itunes music even though preferences had been set in advance for not automatically syncing.

My itunes library had been fine. I had been using an older ipod nano to sync with my itunes library and had been doing manual syncs, with the preferences in itunes set for not allowing "ipods or iphones" to sync automatically. I found out that apple had a program to replace the battery on this older ipod nano, so I sent it in. It was great, they didn't have an exact replacement and sent me a later ipod nano. However, this ipod nano is so new - I will have to get a newer computer with a later operating system to use it.
So, I thought I'd use my old iphone to listen to my old playlists. I thought the preferences were set for not automatically syncing iphone to itunes.
I've had problems in the past with the syncs with this iphone and my computer because of the USB port (1.1). I'm thinking this was the problem.
The apple store did something to update the software on my iphone when it wasn't working one day. I think that when I tried to sync the iphone to the g4 cube via the old port (1.1) it basically wiped out everything on my itunes. Whatever was my selected playlist for my iphone - that was the only music
that remained on my computer and the iphone. I only had about 20 songs purchased on my library, but alot of music that had been downloaded, I gave away those original cds. I did have a back up on my external drive, but that thing died a few weeks ago from some random power outtages we had this fall.
I'm not looking to purchase retrieval software or have some outside third party to retrieve it for me. It's not that much music lost. I just wanted confirmation that this is what happened: that my old iphone sync is what erased the music.

The old iTunes library was lost with the old PC. However, it all that music and content is still on your iPod there are many ways you can extract this content from the iPod and import it back into iTunes.
Your iPod is designed to sync with only one iTunes library at a time. It will recognize the iTunes library on the new PC as a new library. If you sync the iPod with this new library, all content will be erased from the iPod and replaced with what is in the new library. So what you will want to do is copy everything from the iPod to your new iTunes library on your PC first.
See this older post from another forum member Zevoneer covering the different methods and software available to assist you with the task of copying content from your iPod back to your PC and into iTunes.
https://discussions.apple.com/thread/2452022?start=0&tstart=0
B-rock

Enhancement request for VAT Report of Customer and Vendor.

Hello SAP Gurus,
Have enhancement request for adding new fields in existing VAT report of Customer and Vendor like user id, GL account etc.
As I am fresher, can you please help me that how I need to approach. Thanks for your support.
Regards,
Saleem

Hello Saleem,
Almost all fields required for VAT reporting are available in standard tax report
S_ALR_87012357 .
You have to configure the layout from the selection screen as below
regards
pb

The value 4010 39 99 is not allowed for the field MARC-STEUC/BAPI_MARC-CTR

Hi all,
BAPI' BAPI_MATERIAL_SAVEDATA' throws error the below error while creating material.
'The value 4010 39 99 is not allowed for the field MARC-STEUC/BAPI_MARC-CTRL_CODE'
Any idea abt this error.
Regards,
Thiyagu

Hi,
As this BAPI is triggered from external sytem that by client in production environment , I would not be able to dig it further.
Thats why I asked if anybody confronted the same error previously.
Thanks for suggestion.

The value is not allowed for the field Cross-plant CM

Hello All
When i copy material in refernce to existin gone. I am getting this message
"The value is not allowed for the field Cross-plant CM"
I am not putting any thing in this Basic-view Cross-plant CM, but still getting this message.
Any help will be good...Thanks in advance...

Hi,
Please check the check box in front of the field config material is checked?
If so then this material is configurable material
A material that can have different variants.
For example, a car can have different paint, trim, and engines.
Configurable materials have a super bill of material (BOM) that contains all the components for producing every variant of the material. Similarly, they have a super task list that contains all the operations. When a material is configured, only the components and operations needed for a variant are selected.
Please check
BR
Diwakar

The value 1 is not allowed for the field variace key

Hi experts,
When i was creating material master i was getting the status message as "the value 1 is not allowed for the field variance key" , but its stopping there its not moving out of that screen and creating the material record. When i see this field in the material master configuration its an optional field. Can you give me suggestions, where it can go wrong.
Thanks & Regards,
Ravi.

Hi
Can u tell me the field name . I cant get that field ref key. In which view does it come.
Reg
Raja

Text not visible for the new fields created for Data Source Enhancement

Hi .... I am working on Data Source Enhancements. I created few fields and append then to the Data SourceStructure . I also have populated the fields with data. The problem with a field is that I am not getting the text displayed in RSA3 ..Instead I am getting the field name itself.
Example:
FieldName       DataElement    Datatype length dec           Text
ZZDOCTY                AUART         CHAR      4         0      Sales Document Type
ZZNOODL                ZD_NODL     NUMC      1         0      Number of Deliveries
In the above example the field ZZDOCTY is showing me the description in RSA3 i.e. Sales Document Type whereas the field ZZNOODL is not showing the text. Instead it is directly giving the fieldname ZZNOODL. Is it because of the fact that I created a Data Element for that field ??? and as I did not use the predefined data element as I did for ZZDOCTY???? Please reply me soon.....I need to display the text as "Number of Deliveries" instead of ZZNOODL........I am working on 7.0.....

May be the fields are hidden.
Go to RSA6 select your data source and on the tool bar there will be a pencil butonto change. Click that and at the bottom, you will lots of check boxes.
You go the field that you have enhanced and see whether the HIDE boxes are checked. If so, uncheck them, save and execute RSA3.
Ravi Thothadri

Enhancing LBWE for not allowed fields

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for