Userexit for not allowing release order qnty greater than contr targt qnty

hi,
I posted the same mail before, but it seems we cannot do it in configuration..plz provide me a suitable User exit for the same..
When i am creating a release order for a quantity contract, the system is allowing to save the doc if at all the quantity is more than in the contract, i.e. if the user changes the quantity in release order more than the contract quantity, the system is issuing a warning message and allowing to save.(mess no V1 501)
I want to change this warning to an error message..
I checked in OVAH but only V4 messages are available there..
In SE91 i am able to see the message but there is no way for any change..
Thanks,
Sam

hi Sadhu Kishore,
In VTAA..from qnty contract to sales order in item level document flow is updated...the following is assigned there
Create doc. flow records except for dely/goods issue/billdoc
I searched some previous threads of the same characteristics, so everybody is telling the solution will be a user exit...
plz help reg thiss
Thanks,
Sam

Similar Messages

BAPI Program -Invoice_update- For not allowing MIRO if Quality not clear

Hello Gurus,
Does anybody have program done for BAPI -Invoice Update
This is for not allowing user to post MIRO-Vendor Incoming Invoice Creation & Posting if any material against that PO or GR is lying in the Quality Inspection.
Please send if you have the same.
Thanks
Rahul

hi,
You can use user exit --EXIT_SAPLMRMP_010 (LMR1M001) which definitely will solve ur issue.
revert to me if u have any doubts on it.
murali.c

Reason for not allowing static declarations inside an inner class

Is the reason for not allowing static declarations inside an inner class is due to the fact that it can never be accessed at a class level as the outer class has to create an instance of the inner class and any attributes/methods of the inner class has to be accessed through that.
Typically, an instance (non-static) variable can never be accessed in a statement or expression inside a static context but the class variable can be accessed inside a non-static context. Given this, shouldnt the static declarations be allowed inside an inner class?
Correct me if my understanding is wrong.
Thanks

I still couldnt get it clearly. Why i cant i have a static value ( variable ) for all the instances of the inner class irrespective of its enclosing instances of it ( i.e outer class instances). Say in this example below,
class Outer
static int i = 0;
public Inner inner = new Inner();
class Inner // inner class ( non-static nested class )
int j = 0;
static final int k = 2; // compile time constants are allowed
// ininner class
public void m1()
j++;
System.out.println("j is " + j);
i++
System.out.println("i is " + i);
public static void main(String[] arg)
Outer outer1 = new Outer();
outer1.inner.m1(); // j will be 1 & i will be 1
Outer outer2 = new Outer();
outer2.inner.m1() // j will be 1 again & i will be 2. But I would
// want j to be 2. Why is this not allowed?
Looks like something missing..

Scheduling not possible; duration cannot be greater than interval

Hi,
i am runing one yard management scenario.When i am trying to schedule the activity of a vehicle in yard monitor system showing the message "Scheduling not possible; duration cannot be greater than interval
Could you please help in this regard?
Sandip

can you tell me which version it is >
i try to fix in dtexec
getting following error :
Started: 2:02:13 PM
Error: 2015-01-30 14:02:14.68
Code: 0xC000F427
Source: Member Eligibility
Description: To run a SSIS package outside of SQL Server Data Tools you must
install Member Eligibility of Integration Services or higher.
End Error
Warning: 2015-01-30 14:02:14.69
Code: 0x80019002
Description: SSIS Warning Code DTS_W_MAXIMUMERRORCOUNTREACHED. The Execution
method succeeded, but the number of errors raised (2) reached the maximum allow
ed (1); resulting in failure. This occurs when the number of errors reaches the
number specified in MaximumErrorCount. Change the MaximumErrorCount or fix the e
rrors.
End Warning
DTExec: The package execution returned DTSER_FAILURE (1).
Started: 2:02:13 PM
Finished: 2:02:14 PM
i cannot upgrade original package

Enhancing LBWE for not allowed fields

Hi All,
Has anyone ever tried to enhance LBWE structures for filling fileds which are not allowed status (F) in TMCEXCFS table.
We need to report deliveries which are not invoiced status A)yet. So we need to enhance 2LIS_12_VCITM with VBUP-FKSTA field. I know it is possible with appending structure to the extractor and filling it via ABAP code. But field status is F in the TMCEXCFS table.
Thank you very much.

Hi,
I dont think you need to alter TMCEXCFS table.
You can just do it the usual way as of creating an uppend structure to your datasource structure and populating the field via CMOD.
There's been a lot of topics on the issue.
For example you can refer to
LOGISTIC COCKPIT - WHEN YOU NEED MORE - First option: enhance it !

Status Profile for not allowing UD before RR

Hi Experts
I have customized a User Status Profile not to allow UD if no RR is done.
But how ever in the case where I go to UD and try to do a UD for the lot which has not been RR it will give me status check error. So I cancel the error window and goes out of UD transaction. But while going out of UD transaction the system asks a "Confirmation Prompt 'Do you want to save your data first' "
If Yes is pressed the system saves the UD transaction (ofcourse with out a UD code) with Inspection Lot system status ICCO which will not allow the changing of results later.
How to over come this saving of Inspection lot and changing the status ?
Thanks
Jomy

Dear VRMP
When there is a status profile which will block UD without RR and still you try to give UD and try to save the RR gets locked. Please note that UD is not given for the lot.the status of the lot will be REL ICCO. The reason being systems automaticaly updated that inspection is completed
I have come across this issue. I have not found a solution for this. But i have found how to unlock the inspection completion
Go to QA11> Go to menu button EDIT> Reset > Inspection Completion> go to Edit again> Reset > Short term inspection > save> refresh the lot
Now the status of the lot will change from REL ICCO to REL CALC. You can now do the RR & give the UD
Hope i am clear now
Regards
gajesh

ITunes will not allow me 2 add more than 3 songs at one time in2 my library

iTunes won't allow me to add more than 3 songs at one time into my library. I just want to select a number of songs in 'My Music' folder on my pc and then add them in one go. I used to be able to on older versions of iTunes, but now it will only let me add 3 songs (using the 'add file to library' option), and no more then one (using the 'import' option). It's just very annoying as it takes aaages to add songs into my library, when it shouldn't. if anyone knows how to overcome this, please let me know! Thanks
Message was edited by: 5Gmel

how did u do it i've being trying for a long itme now and it takes forever to add music please share

Formatting external drive for read/write PC/Mac & files greater than 4GB

I'm on Snow Leopard and deliver an external drive off-site to a video editor who needs to read/write to the drive and return the edited files and then I need to read/write all over again. All video files are greater than 4GB. How would I go about this? Third party applications like MacDrive create too much overhead when processing video files. FAT32 limits file sizes to 4GB.

Hi WillDuffy;
Your requirement of files greater than 4GB eliminates FAT.
In your case since you don't have access to the PC, I am afraid you are forced to use the NTFS. This will require you to use the reverse engineered effort called NTFS-3G to be able to write to the disk from your Mac. Sorry.
Allan
Message was edited by: Allan Eckert

UserExit for priority in production order

Hi SAP-Gurus,
a friend of mine told me that they had an userexit in place which automatically determines the priority of an order according to the reduction level in the production order...
Supposedly it works according to the following logic...
reduction strategy 4 (100% reduction) -> priority 1
reduction strategy 3 (75% reduction) -> priority 2
reduction strategy 2 (50% reduction) -> priority 3
reduction strategy 1 (25% reduction) -> priority 4
reduction strategy ' ' (no reduction) -> priority ' '
Moreover, the exit has three different triggers. Creating/saving & releasing a production order. At first glance doesn't seem to be to complicated, however I need more info....
Has anybody ever heard of such a functionality and is able to give me the number of the exit?!?
Any help is greatly appreciated....
Regards,
Bobby

Dear Boban,
maybe you mean BAdI Workorder_Update instead of Userexit? In workorder_update you have methodes for at_release, at_save and in_update. You can check in SE18.
Otherwise you can check the user exits in SMOD, the exits in production order start with PPCOxxxx.
Regards,
Sabine

Check For not allowing Subcontracting PO creation against the ROH Items

Dear Sir,
We are looking for help on the following scenario :
For PO Creation , in the Item Category we type blank for "Standard PO" and L for "Subcontracting PO" . We intend to put a check so that users are not able to create the PO for Subcontracting against the Material type "ROH" . Rather Subcontracting PO must be allowed only for the Material having the type as "HALB" .
Kindly guide me on the above scenario please .
Regards
B Mittal

Dear mittal ,
You can do this. create a separate document type in IMG>MM>PURCHASING>PURCHASE ORDER>DEFINE DOCU TYPES. Set the allowed item categories for the document type as only standard. Now raise the purchase order for ROH using this document type. Now in case if you set the item category "L" system will throw an error.
try this if it satisfies you. reward if any.
yuvi.

Credit Check for "Not Relevant" sales order items

Hello All,
I am having a situation where my client takes advance reservations almost an year in advance.
The sales order items have schedule line category to not consume inventory and so the overall status on each line item is "not relevant". The credit status on the order is "not performed". Since the overall status is "not relevant", the sales order amount is not added to the credit master receivables.
We have around 100K orders and I am trying to see if there is a good solution to do a credit check on all these orders.
I am in a desperate situation and would really appreciate a quick response.
Thanks very much for your help.
AM

Hi Shiva Ram,
Thanks very much for your reply.
When I change the schedule line category on the items, the overall status on the line item changes to "Open". The credit status of the order will be "not performed".
If I were to create an advance order with items consuming inventory, it goes through a credit check with the existing configuration.
AM

Why is Apple NOT allowing pre-orders of the iPhone 4 in some countries (AU)

I went on the Apple website for one of their Melbourne stores (Chadstone) and to my disgust I saw that the iPhone 4 would be available on a first come, first serve basis and you WILL NOT be able to pre-order them online. Why??? Come on Apple, answer this!

Why are you posting your question here? This is a USER forum. Apple won't answer you on this forum.

Business Catalyst will not allow me to add more than 11 items to Web Map? Is there any fix for this?

Basically I cannot add more than 11 items on to a web app map. If I add more than 11 than the rest of the items appear of the coast of Africa for some reason. I am not sure why this happens but I was wondering if anyone else has had a similar problem and found a fix.

Basically I cannot add more than 11 items on to a web app map. If I add more than 11 than the rest of the items appear of the coast of Africa for some reason. I am not sure why this happens but I was wondering if anyone else has had a similar problem and found a fix.

Is firefox responsible for not allowing me to check the box in java to enable me to delete the cache,, I cannot check that box

while playing the pogo game site, I keep getting a server error message . pogo says to empty java cache. when I go to java program and find the correct delete page, there are 3 boxes to check. the first already is checked, the second is the empty cache box, but I cannot put a check in it...won't allow me to. is this a firefox problem? I cannot find a solution on the java site

when u click on the link in your first message, and go down towards the bottom to #2 their are 3 choices, each with a box to check....I am talking about the second box down to delete cache apps...it is a box that i am supposed to put a check in and it wont allow me to

Router will not allow PC to filter more than once

I've been using the Restrict Access MAC filtering for awhile. For some reason, however, the router (BEFW11S4 v.4) will only allow a computer to edit the access list once. After that access, clicking on the "Edit Access List" will yield no response, not even an error message. This has been the case with two or three different Mac computers, a PC, and an iPod Touch. Beyond resetting the router and reentering all the MAC addresses (of which I'm tiring), do you have any suggestions? I can't find any other anecdotes or information on this problem. We've had this router for several years; should it be replaced? Thanks...
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Yes, I've tried from PC and Macs, even from an iPod Touch– all the same result: one access per computer.
BUT...For some reason, today was the magic day. Firmware updated. I'm guessing that the previous firmware (from 2003) was the reason for my access problems. I have always had issues upgrading firmware in the past though.
I am very grateful for your help. This has been bugging me for a long time.
Many thanks!

Userexit for not allowing release order qnty greater than contr targt qnty

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for