EPMA 11.1.2.1 – member formula – from "local" to "shared" ?

Planning application created using shared dimensions in EPMA 11.1.2.1
From the “Application Library” editing a Planning application you go to “Dimension Library” whith 3 sections of the window open: “Shared Library”, “Application”, “Properties”.
When you modify a member formula in the “Application” window the member formula from “Shared Library” does not change, thus generating a misalignment between the “shared formula” and the “application formula”
Basically this member becomes “local” for the application…and afterwards if you change the formula from the “Shared Library” window does not change it for the “Application” as well.
So, this is how a “Shared member” becomes “Local member” in a “Shared dimension”.
My question is: Which are the steps to make a “Local member” to become a “Shared member”.
I have tried:
- Remove dimension from application and re-drag and drop it
- Exclude member..and after re-including.
Neither of the above worked…Once that a “Shared member” became a “Local member” I cannot change to make it again “Shared”.
This is very annoying because a formula can be changed by mistake in the Application window and cannot be restored to “Shared”.
Any suggestion on how to solve it ?
Thanks.

Hi,
Have you installed the latest EPMA patches? I know one of them addresses issues with the shared library.
Seb

Similar Messages

IF Statement in Member formula V11 -EPMA

Hi,
As any one used IF and ENDIF statement in the member formula on EPMA V11? I am using the same but it fails to deploy and I have no clue whatsoever.
Does it require an expression OpenInputvaluebox and closedInputvaluebox
Thanks in advance

Hi,
This is the member formula formula I am trying to load:
IF (@IsMbr("Local"))
IF (@IsMbr(Hsp_InputValue))
IF (@IsMbr("No Year"))
IF (@IsMbr("BegBalance"))
IF (@IsMbr("Forecast"))
"RTD" = "Apr"->"Periodic" ->&FcstYear1: "Mar" ->"Periodic"->&FcstYear1;
ELSEIF (@IsMbr("RF1"))
"RTD" = ("Jul"->"Periodic" ->&FcstYear1: "Mar" ->"Periodic"->&FcstYear1) + ("Apr"->"Periodic"->&FcstYear2 : "Jun"->"Periodic"->&FcstYear2);
ELSEIF (@IsMbr("RF2"))
"RTD" = ("Oct"->"Periodic" ->&FcstYear1: "Mar" ->"Periodic"->&FcstYear1) + ("Apr"->"Periodic"->&FcstYear2 : "Sep"->"Periodic"->&FcstYear2);
ELSEIF (@IsMbr("RF3"))
"RTD" = ("Jan"->"Periodic" ->&FcstYear1: "Mar" ->"Periodic"->&FcstYear1) + ("Apr"->"Periodic"->&FcstYear2 : "Dec"->"Periodic"->&FcstYear2);
ENDIF;
ENDIF;
ENDIF;
ENDIF;
ENDIF;
Is there a syntax error here?
Cheers

How to use local variable in member formula?

Hi Expert,
We would like to use a {local variable} in a member formula, so that it can pick up the prompt from webform upon save. Would like to know if it is possible to do? If so, what is the correct syntax?
We attempted to use brace {scenario}, blacket [scenario], blacket with quote ["scenario"]. None of these work.
We are using 11.1.2.1 version, EPMA, Hyperion Planning.
Thanks in advance for your help!

One other pointer. Where did you define your variable? Hopefully you went into Calc Manager and selected <Tools>, <Variables>. From there, navigate to your application or database. Right-click on your application or database and select "New". In the bottom panel, you'll need to select your Variable Type. Make sure you select "Member", and not "Members". You cannot pass "Members" (plural) to a web input form. Also, if you want to define a variable for a custom dimension, you'll need to do it at the database level. Standard dimension member variables can be defined at the app level. (Not sure why this is the case, especially when my custom dimension exists in all plan types . . . . )
Anyway, hope this helps,
- Jake

Help needed in BPC 10 Member Formula

Hello Experts,
We are in BPC 10 NW SP 11.
Facing below error in report for Ratios hierarchy after
member formula is built.
Formulas is related to ratio
IIF([ACCOUNT_GL].[RE_IREV]=0, NULL, [ACCOUNT_GL].[RE_IAADJ]/[ACCOUNT_GL].[RE_IREV]);SOLVE_ORDER=10
RE_IREV is Income node
RE_IAADJ is expense node.
I have tried formula by removing square brockets for ACCOUNT
DIM member. Still no success.
Surprisingly, same formula, same hierarchy works fine in
another Model.
I have also compared measures in both the models, both are
identical.
Error in the report as below.
Server message:
code: UJO_READ_EXCEPTION_018
severity: error
description: MDX statement error: Value RE_IREV
/CPMB/WADNXJI for characteristic /CPMB/WADNXJI unknown
log id: KoFXP08mHM3X08002fJHZW
DATAVALUE: Value RE_IREV /CPMB/WADNXJI for characteristic
/CPMB/WADNXJI unknown
MDX: WITH MEMBER
[Measures].[PERIODIC] AS 'IIF([/CPMB/WADNXJI
PARENTH2].[2/CPMB/ACCTYPE]="INC",-[Measures].[/CPMB/SDATA],IIF([/CPMB/WADNXJI                 PARENTH2].[2/CPMB/ACCTYPE]="EXP",[Measures].[/CPMB/SDATA],IIF([/CPMB/WADNXJI
PARENTH2].[2/CPMB/ACCTYPE]="AST",([Measures].[/CPMB/SDATA],
CLOSINGPERIOD([/CPMB/WADBQQD
PARENTH1].[LEVEL02])),IIF([/CPMB/WADNXJI                 PARENTH2].[2/CPMB/ACCTYPE]="LEQ",-([Measures].[/CPMB/SDATA],
CLOSINGPERIOD([/CPMB/WADBQQD
PARENTH1].[LEVEL02])),-[Measures].[/CPMB/SDATA]))))' SOLVE_ORDER=3 MEMBER [/CPMB/WADNXJI                 PARENTH2].[RE_ALAE_RATIO] AS
'IIF([/CPMB/WADNXJI
PARENTH2].[RE_IREV                         /CPMB/WADNXJI]=0,
NULL, [/CPMB/WADNXJI
PARENTH2].[RE_IAADJ
/CPMB/WADNXJI]/[/CPMB/WADNXJI                 PARENTH2].[RE_IREV                         /CPMB/WADNXJI])'
SOLVE_ORDER=10 SELECT NON EMPTY {[/CPMB/WADBQQD                 PARENTH1].[2013.Q1                         /CPMB/WADBQQD]
,[/CPMB/WADBQQD
PARENTH1].[2013.Q2                         /CPMB/WADBQQD]
,[/CPMB/WADBQQD                 PARENTH1].[2013.Q3                         /CPMB/WADBQQD]
,[/CPMB/WADBQQD
PARENTH1].[2013.Q4                         /CPMB/WADBQQD]
,[/CPMB/WADBQQD
PARENTH1].[2013.TOTAL                      /CPMB/WADBQQD] } * {[/CPMB/WADNXJI                 PARENTH2].[RE_ALAE_RATIO]
,[/CPMB/WADNXJI
PARENTH2].[RE_ALL_RATIOS                   /CPMB/WADNXJI] ,[/CPMB/WADNXJI                 PARENTH2].[RE_COMBINED_RATIO]
,[/CPMB/WADNXJI
PARENTH2].[RE_EXPCOMM_RATIO] ,[/CPMB/WADNXJI                 PARENTH2].[RE_LOSS_RATIO]
,[/CPMB/WADNXJI
PARENTH2].[RE_OTHERCOMM_RATIO] ,[/CPMB/WADNXJI                 PARENTH2].[RE_STAT_COMB_RATIO]
,[/CPMB/WADNXJI
PARENTH2].[RE_STAT_EXP_RATIO] ,[/CPMB/WADNXJI                 PARENTH2].[RE_TOT_EXP_RATIO]
,[/CPMB/WADNXJI
PARENTH2].[RE_TOT_LOSS_RATIO] ,[/CPMB/WADNXJI                 PARENTH2].[RE_ULAE_RATIO] } ON
0 from
[/CPMB/WAMSZKS/!!O/CPMB/WAMSZKS]
WHERE ( [Measures].[PERIODIC] ,[/CPMB/WAD3OFZ                 PARENTH1].[ACTUAL]
,[/CPMB/WAD0VHV
PARENTH1].[ALL_CHANNELS                    /CPMB/WAD0VHV] ,[/CPMB/WAD021F                 PARENTH1].[LEGAL                           /CPMB/WAD021F]
,[/CPMB/WADME7W                 PARENTH1].[ALL_DATASRC                     /CPMB/WADME7W]
,[/CPMB/WAD0DZ0
PARENTH1].[FGI
/CPMB/WAD0DZ0] )
V1:Value RE_IREV /CPMB/WADNXJI for characteristic /CP
V2:MB/WADNXJI unknown
V3:
V4:
Thanks,
Senoy

Hello Vadim,
Thanks for the reply.
I am able to process ACCOUNT_GL dimension.
Also, I am using standard TIME dimension.
I found that the virtual provider(created by using source of data for my model) too is showing the error, when I place above member formula.
I am attaching the error messae when I try to do list records in the virtual provider.
When I remove the member formula, everything is fine
Thanks

Which is faster - Member formula or Calculation script?

Hi,
I have a very basic question, though I am not sure if there is a definite right or wrong answer.
To keep the calculation scripts to a minimum, I have put all the calculations in member formula.
Which is faster - Member formula or calculation scripts? Because, if i am not mistaken, FIX cannot be used in member formulas, so I need to resort to the use of IF, which is not index driven!
Though in the calculation script,while aggregating members which have member formula, I have tried to FIX as many members as I can.
What is the best way to optimize member formulas?
I am using Hyperion Planning and Essbase 11.1.2.1.
Thanks.

Re the mostly "free" comment -- if the block is in memory (qualification #1), and the formula is within the block (qualification #2), the the expensive bit was reading the block off of the disk and expanding it into memory. Once that is done, I typically think of the dynamic calcs as free as the amount of data being moved about is very, very, very small. That goes out the window if the formula pulls lots of blocks to value and they get cycled in and out of the cache. Then they are not free and are potentially slower. And yes, I have personally shot myself in the foot with this -- I wrote a calc that did @PRIORS against a bunch of years. It was a dream when I pulled 10 cells. And then I found out that the client had reports that pulled 5,000. Performance when right down the drain at that point. That one was 100% my fault for not forcing the client to show me what they were reporting.
I think your reference to stored formulas being 10-15% faster than calc script formulas deals with if the Formulas are executed from within the default calc. When the default Calc is used, it precompiles the formulas and handles many two pass calculations in a single pass. Perhaps that is what you are thinking of.^^^I guess that must be it. I think I remember you talking about this technique at one of your Kscope sessions and realizing that I had never tried that approach. Isn't there something funky about not being able to turn off the default calc if a user has calc access? I sort of thing so. I typically assing a ; to the default calc so it can't do anything.
Regards,
Cameron Lackpour

Member Formula Verifies in EAS but not Planning. Error [1200497]

All I am trying to construct a member formula with multiple IF statements. The formula will verify and work in EAS but when we try to refresh the database from planning we receive the error 1200497. We are on version 11.1.13. The offending member formula is below. Any help with what may be wrong is appreciated.
If (@ismbr("020 Pallet","020 Case","020 Each"))
     If ("Tier 2 Low" == #missing)
          "Tier 1 Price";
     Elseif ("Volume"->"020 Bulk Fulfillment"<"Tier 2 Low")
          "Tier 1 Price";
     Elseif ("Volume"->"020 Bulk Fulfillment"<"Tier 3 Low")
          "Tier 2 Price";
     Elseif ("Volume"->"020 Bulk Fulfillment"<"Tier 4 Low")
          "Tier 3 Price";
     Elseif ("Volume"->"020 Bulk Fulfillment"<"Tier 5 Low")
          "Tier 4 Price";
     Elseif ("Volume"->"020 Bulk Fulfillment"<"Tier 6 Low")
          "Tier 5 Price";
     Else
          "Tier 6 Price";
     Endif;
Else
     If (@ismbr("014-003","014-004","014-034","014-035"))
          If ("Tier 2 Low" == #missing)
          "Tier 1 Price";
          Elseif ("Volume"->"014 QA"<"Tier 2 Low")
          "Tier 1 Price";
          Elseif ("Volume"->"014 QA"<"Tier 3 Low")
          "Tier 2 Price";
          Elseif ("Volume"->"014 QA"<"Tier 4 Low")
          "Tier 3 Price";
          Elseif ("Volume"->"014 QA"<"Tier 5 Low")
          "Tier 4 Price";
          Elseif ("Volume"->"014 QA"<"Tier 6 Low")
          "Tier 5 Price";
          Else
          "Tier 6 Price";
          Endif;
     Else
          If ("Tier 2 Low" == #missing)
          "Tier 1 Price";
          Elseif ("Volume"<"Tier 2 Low")
          "Tier 1 Price";
          Elseif ("Volume"<"Tier 3 Low")
          "Tier 2 Price";
          Elseif ("Volume"<"Tier 4 Low")
          "Tier 3 Price";
          Elseif ("Volume"<"Tier 5 Low")
          "Tier 4 Price";
          Elseif ("Volume"<"Tier 6 Low")
          "Tier 5 Price";
          Elseif ("Volume"<"Tier 7 Low")
          "Tier 6 Price";
          Elseif ("Volume"<"Tier 8 Low")
          "Tier 7 Price";
          Elseif ("Volume"<"Tier 9 Low")
          "Tier 8 Price";
          Elseif ("Volume"<"Tier 10 Low")
          "Tier 9 Price";
     Else
          "Tier 10 Price";
     Endif;
Endif;
Endif;

Is it being applied to plan types that don't include all the members being referenced in the formula, it could be that it validates on one plan type but not another.
Cheers
John
http://john-goodwin.blogspot.com/

Block creation problem in member formula

Hi,
I have a member formula as below :
IF(.....)
x = a/b;
ENDIF
where a,b have their own member formulas.
There is no issue with the calculations of x,a or b, but I am facing an issue with block creation of x.
Is there a way to handle block creation through member formulas? I know the way out through calc scripts, but i am trying to limit the use of calc scripts.
Thanks!
Note:The storage property of all three members is store. Also, a and b lie in the same intersection (same block), and x lies in another intersection.

In the following section of the dbag: http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E12825_01/epm.111/esb_dbag/frameset.htm?dcaoptcs.htm...
Under the sub-section: In Equations in a Dense Dimension...
It states as follows:
In Equations in a Dense Dimension
When you use a cross-dimensional operator in an equation in a dense dimension, Essbase does not automatically create the required blocks if both of these conditions apply:
Resultant values are from a dense dimension.
The operand or operands are from a sparse dimension.
You can use the following techniques to create the blocks and avoid the performance issue.
Ensure that the results members are from a sparse dimension, not from a dense dimension. In this example, the results member Budget is from a sparse dimension:
FIX(Sales)
Budget = Actual * 1.1;
ENDFIX
FIX(Expenses)
Budget = Actual * .95;
ENDFIX
Use the DATACOPY calculation command to create and then calculate the required blocks. See Using DATACOPY to Copy Existing Blocks.
Use a member formula that contains the dense member equations:
FIX(Sales, Expenses)
Budget (Sales = Sales -> Actual 1.1;*
Expenses = Expenses -> Actual .95;)*
ENDFIX
The phrasing of that last part would lead me to believe that block creation via a member formula is possible. Though I'm not sure of the member to which that formula should be applied. Furthermore, the code looks funky in that we're fixing on Sales and fixing on Expenses, and them on the left side of the equation within the fix.
Thoughts anyone?

Need help in member formula

Hi All,
i need a help in memberformula
i've two sparce dimenions as below:
Dim1:
A
--B
--C
Dim2:
a
---b
---c
d
---e
---f
i need to write member formula on C from Dim1 if member is parent level member from dim2 then its to sum up with its childen values against B from dim1.
If member is parent level memer from dim2 ex:d
C->d = B->e + B->f
Thanks in advance,
Kiran
Edited by: kirannch on Oct 16, 2012 4:16 PM

Hi Tim,
Thanks for your response.
I'm using all HFM dimensions in Essbase Except Cust2 and Cust4.
In my outline Account, Period and Year are dense dimensions and rest are Sparse.
i'm comparing the data at parenttot with usdtot, contr as we are using flat members.
Below script is not updating any parent level value of USDTOT combination. i'm running the aggregation with exclude elim data before executing this calc script.
USDTOT,Contr are sparse dimension members and Entity also sparse.
Please can you help on the below scripts.
SET CALCPARALLEL 3;
SET AGGMISSG OFF;
SET FRMLBOTTOMUP OFF;
SET CACHE HIGH;
SET LOCKBLOCK HIGH;
EXCLUDE ( "Elim")
/Calculation "USDTOT" at Parent level of Entity Dimension with sum of children same parent entity with Contr member */
SET UPDATECALC OFF;
FIX("ACT","FY12")
"USDTOT"(
IF(NOT @ISLEV("ENTITY", 0));
"USDTOT" = @SUM(@CHILDREN(@CURRMBR("ENTITY"->"Contr")));
ENDIF;);
ENDFIX;
ENDEXCLUDE;
Thanks in advance,
Kiran
Edited by: kirannch on Oct 24, 2012 7:38 PM

Issue in Member Formula after enabling parallelization

Hi all,
System Details :
                SAP BW      - 731 Release - SP9
               CPMBPC     - 801 Release - SP4
               EPM Excel - 10.0 SP 15 Patch 1
Model Details :
              Periodic Model
Background Information :
          Sometimes back I had a performance issue in my BPC 10.0 report. So I implemented the steps mentioned in the SAP NOTE 1854228. After this, the report performance increased very signifiacntly.
Issue Details :
     There are few reports where in the Column axis we were trying to fetch data of both Periodic and YTD Measure along with Time Period. and in the row Axis I have accounts.
     My Issue is if in a single report I keep accounts :
                        CATEGORY 1 - Don't have member formula
                         CATEGORY 2 - have member formula : but accounts used in the formula of member formula are of same account type
                         CATEGORY 3 - have member formula : but accounts used in formula are of different account types ( e.g mix of INC and AST )
     Then the values fetched for any accounts for YTD measure is same as Periodic Measure.
But If I separate this single report to 2 different reports, where
                    1. In one report I kept accounts of Category 1 & 2.
                    2. In 2nd report I kept accounts of Category 3
Then the values for both YTD and Periodic are same.
As an developer I can do this. But this creates problem when user creates some Adhoc reports, where they want all there category of accounts in a single report. So if any body has any idea about how to overcome this issue, then it's very much appreciated.

Thanks Valdim. I was really expecting some respose from you.
Example :
ANNUAL CHURN = ( Disconnection / Avg Base YTD ) * -12.
     Where Disconnection : EXP type account
                 Avg Base YTD : AST Type Account.
                                            = Avg Base Periodic / Month Num of Current Month.

Member formula returning text

I am not sure Essbase has the capacity to do this but I figured this would be the place to ask. Can you set a member formula to return text instead of a number? For example, in Excel you can set up an If statement that will return a number or text depending on set variables. Can Essbase do this as well?
We have some calculations that depending on whether certain variables are positive or negative could return a result that really has no meaning. So, if this were to be the case I would like it to return a N/A instead of the number. I can do this in Excel based on data pulled from Essbase but it would be much easier and less to maintain if Essbase was able to do it for me.
Thanks

Currently, Essbase databases can only store and return numbers. You can, however, mark the cell as '#Missing' and thus meaningless data would not be returned. The #Missing cells can have a string label associated with them (on the client if you are using Excel).
Tim Tow
Applied OLAP, Inc

Member formula restriction problem

I have made a customized form in Capex the layout of the form is that on row side i have Line Item dimension with 5 members and their parent and on coloumn side i have account dimension with 7 members selected.
I am using a member formula on the parent of the line item member on row side and in that member formula i have restricted one of the 7 account dimension member on the column with the help of IF statement. My problem is that if i dont use that if statment the member formula works fine but it also works on the other 6 members of the account dimension (on column) and if i use the IF statment then the member fornmula does not work at all.
My requirement is that the member formula should work on the combination of that 1 member of account dimension and parent of line item on row side.
Can anybody help me with that?

Hi Nilanjan,
1) all the members are in the same hierarchy (in fact, there is only one hierarchy)
2) all these members come from different branches of the hierarchy, they are not siblings, some are parents of others, however.
The values I specified are real values which I actually get when putting the accounts in an EVDRE report. Therefore, separately in EVDRE I see the calculated value 6 for account A and the fixed value 1 for account C. So, I expect to see also the value 1 for the account B and instead I see 2 meaning that for BPC 6 <= 1.
That is why I assume that BPC does not recalculate the account A used in the account B. And that is why I assume that solve_order is the problem. And I can not make this solve_order work in any way. What are the rules of SolveOrder's usage?
Thanks for help.
Valera

Do the custom rollup member formulas work recursively for parent child dimension?

Hi
We have custom rollup set up for Account dimension which is parent child.
It seems to work fine when the custom member formula refers to a base account member i.e. if the formula for MemberKey4 is (MemberKey1 + MemberKey2) then it shows the sum of the underlying members 1 and 2.
But if the formula for MemberKey10 is (MemberKey3 + MemberKey4) then it should evaluate the value for MemberKey4 first and then add to it value for MemberKey3 to come up with final number for MemberKey10.
Do the custom rollup work fine with the recursive calculations? Is this recursion limited to some level?
Thanks
Shailesh

Hi Jorg,
Thanks for your input.
Actually the hierarhcy is more determined by the parent child relationship. So we cannot move the members as per the formula. And further the formulas are not always additive, there are divisions and multiplactions happening also.
Further the calculated members (account members) are used in different places, the usage level of calculated members could be 3 in some cases i.e. MemberKey15 = (calculated using MemberKey10 = (calculated using MemberKey7 = (Calculated using MemberKey4 = (calculated using base members)))). Now inserting the base members in place of a calcuated member becomes more of string manipulation.
And on the top of above complexity, the formulas are not static and they are more user defined, they may change between time periods, which forces us to write a dynamic procedure to translate the 'business formula' into SSAS formula. We expect the custom rollup to work as expected (i.e. if the formula contains a calculation involving the calculated member, it should resolve that first and so on) and we have written generic procedure to replace the Account Code in the 'business formula' with the accont key value with the account hierarchy char string.
In the link http://doc.ddart.net/mssql/sql2000/html/olapdmad/agmdxadvanced_6jn7.htm for AS2000, it talks about the calculation pass deapth, it says:
.......If a cube has custom rollup formulas or custom rollup operators, a second calculation pass is performed to handle the computations needed to calculate these features.......
Now from the above, it is obvious that the OLAP engine will automatically go into recursion if the formula contains a cacluated member and it knows that the calculated member has to be resolved first before calculating the final formula result. The above article also talks about 'Calculation Pass Number' property in the AdvanceCube Editor (AS2000), which can be set to the value depending on the expected number of passes required in a given scenario. I don't find such an equivalent peoperty for SSAS 2005.
Would anybody please throw some more ideas / insights on this issue?
Jorg, thanks again for your input...
Shailesh

Dynamic calc member formula problem

Hello Gurús!
We are using a member called "Full Year" that is a Dynamic calc with a member formula that calls another dynamic calc. For any reason, it is not working when we try to retrieve it from Excel Add-in.
Any ideas? Any problem for put a Dynamic Calc as member formula of antoher Dynamic calc?
Thanks for your time!
Regards,
Ariel

that can be the problem, depending on what dimension they are in, the order the two pass occurs could couse you issues. In cases like this I've had to put the entire calculation into the member I wanted to calculate and bypass the dependency

Problem with member formulas and allocation

Hi guys,
I am experiencing a problem I am not currently able to solve. I'm building a planning application in which
volumes can be inputed in different units of measure (5 are currently available). For example a user can input in liter or KG, and the
system converts this data in all the different units of measure available, executing a script logic after
the input (for every bas member is also stored a conversion factor, which is used by the logic for conversion).
Two are the major issues of this approach:
1) storing 5 different volumes for every SKU is consuming in term of disk and DB space;
2) script logic must be executed every time the user sends data and in some cases this could be time-consuming.
The solution I'm trying is to use member formulas in order to calculate different units of measure, storing
only one of these. However, this way lead to another problem: when I try to input data with a top-down approach, using BPC
ALLOCATION ENGINE, I cannot use the correct unit of measure as a driver for the spread.
For example, if I input volumes is KG, and the unit of measure stored is only liter, I cannot use nor KG as a driver (because is not stored,
but only a member formula) neither liter, because the spread using this driver would lead to a wrong result.
What I would like to do is to give the user the possibility to input in the desired unit of measure at an aggregated level and spread data
using the existing mix, which must be volumes with the same unit of measure used for input.
Does anyone has an idea that could help me?
Regards
Edited by: utenza pubblica Public on Oct 23, 2009 4:48 AM

hi
i found a solution for the Problem in another Forum
http://businessintelligence.ittoolbox.com/groups/technical-functional/hyperion-admin-l/dynamic-calc-formulas-not-refreshed-1719379?cv=expanded
The suggestion is
1. change the Member from Dynamic Calc to Store
2. Refresh (After these Step the Formulas where still out of sync)
3. change the Member from Store to Dynamic Calc
4. Refresh
After these Steps the Formulas are in sync again.
Kevin Kraft
Edited by: Kevin Kraft on Mar 25, 2009 12:33 PM

EPM add-in for Excel question : How to send data from local member?

Dear experts,
for EPM add-in for excel, how do I send data from local member?
best regards,
Evans.

Hello Evans,
Could you please explain what is your requisite? What is the formula on your local member?
You can also apply formulas to formatting sheet. This way you can reference the cells in your formatting sheet formulas and save the values in the report area.
Please check this blog:
How to use Excel formulas in BPC Input Schedules
Thank you
Best regards,
Raquel Oliveira

EPMA 11.1.2.1 – member formula – from "local" to "shared" ?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for