ERP application and multiple tablespaces

Hi All,
I am trying to build a ERP style application in my company...modules are Accounting, Purchase, Sales, Export, Payroll & HR.
So far I have finished Accounting..What I did is.
1. Created one table space called ERPShared and created tables in it which are shared among all the applications.
script is as follows.
CREATE TABLESPACE "ERPSHARED_DATA"
LOGGING
DATAFILE 'D:\XP\oracle\product\HGDB\oradata\ERPShared\SHARED_DATA01.DBF' SIZE 100M
AUTOEXTEND ON
EXTENT MANAGEMENT LOCAL UNIFORM SIZE 3M
SEGMENT SPACE MANAGEMENT  AUTO ;
CREATE USER "ERPADMIN"  PROFILE "DEFAULT" IDENTIFIED BY "erpadmin"
DEFAULT TABLESPACE "ERPSHARED_DATA"
TEMPORARY TABLESPACE "TEMP" 
    QUOTA UNLIMITED ON "ERPSHARED_DATA"
    QUOTA UNLIMITED ON "ERPSHARED_DATA_INDX"
    QUOTA 0         ON "SYSTEM"
    ACCOUNT UNLOCK;
GRANT CREATE SESSION TO "ERPADMIN";
GRANT CREATE TYPE TO "ERPADMIN";
GRANT CONNECT, RESOURCE TO "ERPADMIN";
GRANT CREATE ANY TRIGGER TO ERPADMIN;
GRANT ALTER ANY TRIGGER TO ERPADMIN;
GRANT DROP ANY TRIGGER TO ERPADMIN;
GRANT CREATE ANY PROCEDURE TO ERPADMIN;
GRANT ALTER ANY PROCEDURE TO ERPADMIN;
GRANT DROP ANY PROCEDURE TO ERPADMIN;
GRANT CREATE VIEW TO ERPADMIN;First of all plz tell me is this the right way of creating tablespace?
Second I want guidance from you guys that I have another user "Purchase" and other users too and HOW to assign this ERPShared tablespace to other users or shoud I keep all the tables in one ERPShared tablespace with one user? what is the correct method performance wise and concept wise.
Thanks

You should create seperate Users for different modules of the applications.
This will keep the system neat and clean.
Modularization is the key, and that is why you are creating seperate modules rather than creating 1 big application :)
HOW to assign this ERPShared tablespace to other users or shoud I keep all >>the tables in one ERPShared tablespace with one userRefer to the script for creating user (in your post)
CREATE USER "ERPADMIN" PROFILE "DEFAULT" IDENTIFIED BY "erpadmin"
DEFAULT TABLESPACE "ERPSHARED_DATA"DEFAULT TABLESPACE clause will assign this user objects onto the given tablespace name ("ERPSHARED_DATA" in your case). So to assign the same tablespace to other users, you must mention this tablespace while creating other USERS.
Generally, it is advisable to keep seperate tablespaces for different Users.
Example:
TABLESPACE USER
ERPSHARED_DATA ERPADMIN
ERP_PURCHASE_DATA PURCHASE
ERP_SALES_DATA SALES
In many cases, more than 1 tablespace for 1 user. For instance, if all the Large tables will be created in 1 common tablespace which will have big datafile.
You can find more:
http://72.14.235.104/search?q=cache:Z3DayME5gSEJ:proligence.com/noug_dw.doc+advantages+of+creating+separate+tablespaces&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=2&gl=in
Search for keyword "Tablespaces"
Cheers,
Aalap Sharma :)

Similar Messages

  • Multiple applications and Tablespaces

    Hi All,
    I am currently an SQL Server DBA and Admin but I'm currently trying to learn a little more about how Oracle does its thing. As such, could someone help me with the following:
    In SQL Server we might have up to 70 -> 80 "Databases" attached to a single database "Instance". Each database could be for a particular application we are developing for one of our clients, or it could even be for a specific internal system.
    I know Oracle has a different definition of what a "Database" is so I'm wondering if someone could give some guidance on how I would create my 70 or 80 databases under Oracle (if I were so inclined).
    The nearest analogue I can see in Oracle would perhaps be Tablespaces, but that doesn't seem like a perfect fit either. Is it even possible or common to have several database applications running under one instance of Oracle, or is Oracle perhaps just meant for single uber applications?
    Many thanks to anyone who can help
    Best Regards
    Simon

    [email protected] wrote:
    Hi All,
    I am currently an SQL Server DBA and Admin but I'm currently trying to learn a little more about how Oracle does its thing. As such, could someone help me with the following:
    In SQL Server we might have up to 70 -> 80 "Databases" attached to a single database "Instance". Each database could be for a particular application we are developing for one of our clients, or it could even be for a specific internal system.
    I know Oracle has a different definition of what a "Database" is so I'm wondering if someone could give some guidance on how I would create my 70 or 80 databases under Oracle (if I were so inclined).
    The nearest analogue I can see in Oracle would perhaps be Tablespaces, but that doesn't seem like a perfect fit either. Is it even possible or common to have several database applications running under one instance of Oracle, or is Oracle perhaps just meant for single uber applications?
    Many thanks to anyone who can help
    Best Regards
    SimonThe analogy is that a "database" in SQLServer is more like a "schema" in Oracle. A schema is the collection of all objects (tables, indexes, procedures, etc.) that are owned by one given user account. That user account can be created for the sole purpose of owning the objects. Real users (humans, or apps that connect with their own credentials on behalf of a human) can be granted access to the schema objects.
    There is no inherent relation between any of this and a tablespace. While a user account will have a default tablespace for it's objects, the user can actually have objects in any tablespace for which it has quota. And a given tablespace can contain objects from multiple schemas. Many DBA's will make a one-for-one relationship between a schema/user and a tablespace, but that is strictly an organizational decision and there is nothing defined in the database to enforce it.

  • One db and user for multiple tablespaces or schemas per server?

    Hello again.
    I installed Oracle 11g on server_1 and created one database db_1.
    Using Enterprise Manager, I did the following:
    Created a tablespace myname_1.
    Created a user myname_1.
    Logged in as myname_1 and created a table into the default tablespace myname_1.
    When creating this table, the schema field defaulted to myname_1.
    Created another tablespace myname_2.
    My confusion about the relationship between tablespaces, users, and schemas starts here:
    When I try to create a new table for tablespace myname_2, I get an error:
    "user myname_2 does not exist"
    I am seeking some clarification on these levels of organization in Oracle.
    My goal is to setup my server with one database each and one user each per database.
    Then, I think I want to create multiple tablespaces and organize objects per tablespace.
    Or should it be per schema?
    Eventually each tablespace will be moved to a separate server.
    Any comments and suggestions are greatly appreciated.
    Thank you for helping.

    Hello,
    This error means user MYNAME_2 doesn't exists and you have to create one.
    Example 1:
    CREATE USER MYNAME_2
      IDENTIFIED BY "my_password"
      DEFAULT TABLESPACE MYNAME_1
      TEMPORARY TABLESPACE TEMP
      PROFILE DEFAULT
      ACCOUNT UNLOCK;
      -- 4 Roles for KLONDIKE
       GRANT RESOURCE TO MYNAME_2; ---> This privs give unlimited quota on all the tablespaces
      GRANT CONNECT TO MYNAME_2;
      ALTER USER MYNAME_2 DEFAULT ROLE NONE;
    Then create your table (you were missing "AS" )
    create table myname_2.mytable_1 as
    select * from source_table@dblink_2;Example 2: If you want to create table mytable_1 in tablespace myname_2 then you have to create tablespace myname_2 first. To create table in different tablespace than user default tablespace
    create table mytable_1 tablespace myname_2 as select * from source_table@dblink;Regards
    OrionNet

  • Pros and Cons of Application Isolation/Multiple server instances?

    Hi. I'm setting a new server using ColdFusion Enterprise with Apache to migrate several web application from and old server with ColdFusion 7 server. I'm currently doing research regarding multiple server instances in order to have a separate server for production apps and another for development apps (see http://help.adobe.com/en_US/ColdFusion/10.0/Admin/WSc3ff6d0ea77859461172e0811cbf363c31-7ff 5.html and https://wikidocs.adobe.com/wiki/display/coldfusionen/Using+Multiple+Server+Instanceshttp:/ /). In addition, I'm also doing research regarding application isolation to have separate production application in separate servers. I'm trying to identify all pros and cons for both "Application Isolation" and "Multiple Server Instances" to make a decision on whether I will proceed in applying these techniques. I have found several links that talk about some of the advantages but have not been able to find anything regarding possible disadvantages. Have anyone in this forum has used any of the techniques, and can provide more information/experiences regarding the pros and cons?

    Hi Ricardo_Lorenzo,
    Whether to go for Multiserver instances or Single server, is totally a user requirement based decison. If a user has Single website, or multiple websites (of the same nature, in terms of functionality), usually the part of same domain, then they would go for Single sever installation. One single instance will handle the requests from all the websites (if there are multiple). There would not be a clustering/failover setup within ColdFusion and can use the ColdFusion Standard or Enterprise version.
    On the other hand, if a user has multiple websites, all with different functionality and have multiple applications (may or may not) running, then they can go for Multiserver installation. Each website can be configured with individual instances. Clustering can be done within ColdFusion if needed. One would need an Enterprise license of ColdFusion for the same.
    Hope this helps.
    Regards,
    Anit Kumar

  • Multiple Applications and RPC

    I'm having problems with loading multiple sub-applications
    and making remote calls to BlazeDS. I get an error saying:
    TypeError: Error #1034: Type Coercion failed: cannot convert
    Object@ce33921 to mx.messaging.messages.ErrorMessage.
    I have read a few places that I should use registerClassAlias
    or that I need to create a Bootstrap application that loads some of
    the required classes. However, I haven't been successful with
    either. Does someone have an example of how to load multi-version
    sub-applications that can also make remote calls?
    Here is some more information about my current attempt:
    When the application starts it has a preloader that loads
    messaging classes (Preloader below). Then when other
    sub-applications are added I create a new ApplicationDomain to use
    for the loader context. I would like to have the new
    sub-applications as siblings to the main application but still have
    the same messaging classes. Is this the correct approach? Any
    suggestions?

    "bistro37" <[email protected]> wrote in
    message
    news:gok8rt$as$[email protected]..
    > I'm having problems with loading multiple
    sub-applications and making
    > remote
    > calls to BlazeDS. I get an error saying: TypeError:
    Error #1034: Type
    > Coercion
    > failed: cannot convert Object@ce33921 to
    > mx.messaging.messages.ErrorMessage.
    http://www.magnoliamultimedia.com/flex_examples/Amys_Flex_FAQ.pdf
    I think it'sQ8 but don't have time to check right now, search
    for Module.

  • Is it possible to deploy SharePoint or its Service Applications on: multiple DB-Servers and multiple SQL Instances?

    Hello Forum,
    We have a SharePoint 2013 farm (Enterprise edition) that uses one single SQL Server 2012 (Standard edition). That statement means: All my SharePoint DBs e.g. (Config, Admin, Content, and Service Apps) DBs are hosted and running onto one single instance e.g.
    Server1\SQLInstance1.
    We have some new requirements to install and configure BI tools such as: PerformancePoint services and PowerPivot. BI tools require either SQL Server 2012 Enterprise or BI editions, and we do NOT want to upgrade our current SQL Server1\SQLInstance1
    Instead, We have other separate SQL Server instance which is enterprise edition let's name it (ServerX\InstanceX) that is running standalone, and we are thinking or using it, and my 2 questions are:
    1) Can we use this other separate
    SQL Server instance which is enterprise edition to host the create and hosts the DBs of PerformancePoint services and PowerPivot ?
    2) My second question is the same: Can I create PerformancePoint services application in my SharePoint farm, But in the Database Server field, I fill up
    the details of the other DB server ServerX\InstanceX  which is the one that is SQL
    enterprise edition ? Will this work ?
    Any official Microsoft resources/links tell that it is possible to deploy SharePoint or its service applications on multiple DB-Servers and multiple SQL Instances?

    Thank you Alex and Anil,
    What are the ramifications of that?
    I mean, Assuming that I have created such a farm where most of SarePoint DBs in Standard SQL instance while the PerformancePoint service application and others e.g. PowerPivot and reporting service are deployed and configured onto other Enterprise SQL instance.
    Are there any recommendations or concerns that you would like to draw my attention to ?

  • Using XA with Oracle ERP application

    Hi,
    We have two Tuxedo Domains that we need to establish global transaction:
    First Domain - Tuxedo 6.4 with Oracle 8.0.6 database.
    Second Domain - Tuxedo 6.4 with Oracle ERP application (Oracel version 8.0.5)
    A Client that calls a Tuxedo server in the first domain this service doing some work
    on the database and then calls another service in the second domain (using Domain
    connection).
    The service in the second Domain activate a Oracle API (package) from the ERP application.
    The Rollback works but we problem with the commit. We recieve the following Oracle
    Error - ORA-06574: Function "VIEW_ALL" references package state can not execute remotly.
    Revital Bloom
    [email protected]

    Subbu,
    As I mentioned earlier in this thread, support for Oracle RAC has been
    implemented in Tuxedo 9.1 and in the Tuxedo 8.1 and Tuxedo 9.0 rolling patch
    streams. There are no plans to backport this feature to Tuxedo 8.0. If you
    plan to use RAC transactionally and if it is possible for multiple services
    that could be located on different RAC instances to be accessed in a single
    transaction (which will be true for most applications), then you should
    upgrade to a version of Tuxedo with support for Oracle RAC. The
    documentation at http://e-docs.bea.com/tuxedo/tux91/ads/adorac.htm#248431
    gives an overview of RAC support in Tuxedo.
    Ed
    <Subramonian Arumugom> wrote in message news:[email protected]..
    Hello Nadeer, Hello Ed,
    Has the implementation of Tuxedo8.0 with Oracle RAC was completed
    successfully ?.
    If it is done , I have few doubts. Could you please help me ?.
    1) I hope your Tuxedo middleware connects to the oracle Database using
    Oracle XA resource manager and the TMS server built using buildtms with
    oracle as RM .As per the mail from Ed, migration of Tuxedo9.1 should be done
    before moving to Oracle RAC.
    Also from BEA documentation, Oracle RAC support was given as new feature in
    Tuxedo9.1.
    Our Application uses Oracle RM to connect to Oracle DB[ Oracle 10g] from
    Tuxedo8.0. So do we need to upgrade to Tuxedo9.1. for using Oracle RAC ?.
    Thanks for your help
    Best Regards
    Subbu
    #9880278452
    Edited by subramonian.a at 04/16/2007 12:15 AM
    Edited by subramonian.a at 04/16/2007 12:19 AM
    Edited by subramonian.a at 04/16/2007 1:37 AM
    Edited by subramonian.a at 04/16/2007 8:20 AM

  • Having one single tablespace versus multiple tablespace?

    My database version is
    Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.1.0.7.0 - 64bit Production
    PL/SQL Release 11.1.0.7.0 - Production
    CORE 11.1.0.7.0 Production
    TNS for Linux: Version 11.1.0.7.0 - Production
    NLSRTL Version 11.1.0.7.0 - Production
    My os version is
    Linux damdat01 2.6.18-128.7.1.el5 #1 SMP Wed Aug 19 04:00:49 EDT 2009 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
    My database is OLP system.
    My question is what are the advantages and disadvantages having one single tablespace versus multiple tablespace?
    Easy to maintain when you have single tablespace. but hard to track the IO issues.
    Any other input from any one? Please let me know.

    Billy  Verreynne  wrote:
    EdStevens wrote:
    Does the term "keeping all your eggs in one basket" mean anything ....Well, in the majority of cases, even when using multiple tablespaces they will be on the same storage array or same file system. So the "+all eggs in one basket+" goes a lot a deeper down the storage layer than just the top part where you deal with logical tablespace storage containers.
    Absolutely. Except for the bazillion microscopic solid-state switches and a layer of rust on a spinning platter, everything else is just layers of abstraction. One's thinking and frame of reference depends on what layer of abstraction one is dealing with.
    The major problem with multiple tablespace for a single application And here is where there was some 'fuzz' in the OPs question. I don't recall him specifying one TS per application. Maybe he assumed that, but I read it as one (user) TS per database.
    a) deciding the space allocation of each tablespace
    b) managing what is created in which tablespace
    This comes down do an issue of micro-managing space versus simply chucking everything into a single container and let god ASM/Oracle/LUN/driver/whatever sort them out.
    Issues like transportable tablespaces... separating your logical data into different containers... and the like? That is not really sufficient justification to me for having to micro-manage space for a 101 tablespaces. This simply creates a huge workload on the space management part of the database - that is complex and difficult to deal with. Free space from an underutilised (incorrectly sized) tabelspace cannot simply be moved and reallocated to a tablespace stressed for more space. Everything but...
    Which is why I prefer having fewer tablespaces as this means not having to micro-manage space and continually having to wave a threatening lead pipe around to make sure that applications and developers play rigidly within the large set of strict rules of how these many tablespaces are to be used.Agreed. One can go way overboard, and a lot of this discussion hinges on the OP's intent, as I mentioned above -- one TS per ... what? My default position is one TS per application schema. Normal human users all default to one USERS ts, but don't have any quota because they don't have any reason to create objects.

  • How do I install Snow Leopard while keeping files, applications, and settings

    I need to update my system, I realized that I need Snow Leopard (quiet late) before Maverick. My question is, how can I install it keeping files and all the data. I found this on Internet, does it work?
    Install Snow Leopard while keeping files, applications, and settings
    If you follow these steps, the installer will replace your operating system if one is already present, but will preserve your account information and personal files.  You may have to reinstall some applications, however.
    Insert the install disc (or the first install disc if you have more than one) into your disc drive. Restart your computer while holding down the c key. This causes your computer to start up from the install disc rather than your hard drive. When you see the gray Apple insignia, release c . 
    The Mac OS X installer should open automatically. Follow the on-screen prompts to read and accept the license agreement and begin the installation. When prompted to choose a destination disk, select your preferred location and click Install. 
    When the Mac OS X installation finishes with the disc, restart your computer. After the installation completes, a configuration program may begin automatically if you are installing for the first time. You will need to supply basic setup information for your computer. 
    Update your system software to ensure that you have the most recent operating system components.  From the Apple menu, select Software Update... , and then follow the instructions on the screen. Often, you will have to restart your computer, and you may have to run Software Update multiple times before it can completely update your system.

    That's why you need to back it up. You won't need to restore the backup immediately afterwards unless something goes wrong during the upgrade, but you'll need it later; the drive will eventually fail.
    (105428)

  • One application with Multiple schemas- common application frame work

    Hi All,
    I am trying setup a common application frame work in apex. Please help me.
    How to achieve this.
    Creation of one application attached to different schemas at run time. So that my application maintaince is going to be easy instated of creating copies of same application.
    More details:
    1. I have one application with 100 pages pointing to a schema dev_common in one workspace APP_COMMON. I have 50 schemas with same structure of dev_common schema with different set of data ( because of large amount of data).
    So I want to create one application attached to different schemas.
    2. And another thing is I have 100 users, the user can work on 1 or multiple schemas ( I mean same application with different schemas attached)
    Any help much appreciated.
    Thanks,

    Thank you for the reply.
    >> b) I think you have to give access rights for the dev_common and app_common to all users.
    Dev_common schema is a kind of placeholder. I have 50 schemas same as dev_common because of different business requirements but the front end is same for all 50 schemas. How can we create one application used for 50 schemas instead of creating 50 applications and 50 workspaces.
    Please help me.

  • One Search service application for multiple web applications in a single server

      We are planning to host 17 Web applications in a single Server. Do I need to create search service application for each web application or I need to create one  Search service application , create a Content source for each web
    application and create a Result source for filtering. Which is the best approach. And which approach takes more RAM memory.
       In my application I am using Search web part, "Recently Changed Items", "Popular Items" web parts. when I created only one one  Search Service application for all web applications and using Result sources ,
    I am not getting the results. What could be the problem.

    Hi,
    One SSA is ok, but you should think about access rights. If the access is clear cut between all the web apps you should be ok with one SSA. Multiple result sources limiting on content source also works, but could easily be bypassed.
    Multiple SSA's will eat up RAM/CPU like a mother :)
    As for popular etc.. it could be due to how those sources are set up, but haven't investigated or tested this much.
    Thanks,
    Mikael
    Search Enthusiast - SharePoint MVP/MCT/MCPD - If you find an answer useful, please up-vote it.
    http://techmikael.blogspot.com/
    Author of Working with FAST Search Server 2010 for SharePoint

  • When to use WEb Dynpro application and Portal application in NW dev studio

    I would like to know what is the difference between
    webdynpro application  and EP Application using PDK.
    Are they comaparable  ...Which one has an edge over the other specific to any applications.
    I want develop an application related to e-commerce using the SAP R3 as backend for an industiry(where in a registered user can place an order and query on the staus of order. All the data will be stored in R3 ).
    I am planning to dev this using NW dev studio , but have an appehension about which application is useful for this kind of application either webdynpro or EP application .
    can anybody explain which one has edge over the other ( Webdynpro or EP applcations in context with NW Dev studio) and why.
    thanks
    PK

    Hi,
    <b>Webdynpro</b> is used when requirements ask for a prototype using minimal time n effort.
    Highly skilled programmers are not necessary to write a webdynpro application
    It uses dynamic controls without reloading the page.
    <b>Portal components</b> esp Abstract portal component provides a lean method to write HTML command to web client
    Large interactive components requires more programming.
    <b>WebDynpro</b> is a highly declarative, tool-based programming model. It minimizes platform-dependent "plumbing" code for building UIs and maximizes declarative metadata describing huge portions of a typical application in a platform-independent way.
    Web Dynpro follows a "top-down" approach in order to consistently support multiple runtime platforms.
    In Web Dynpro you just have to drag & drop the UI components.
    <b>Portal components</b> has followed a "bottom-up", programming-driven approach to Web development.
    Regards,
    Pooja.

  • Webservice (oracle erp applications) to SAP PI to SAP R/3 scenario.

    Hi All,
    I have to make webservice (oracle erp applications) to SAP PI to SAP R/3 scenario.
    1. If I make Outbound Interface with 2 fields  in SAP PI. Publish its Webservice in Service Registry and then
        send its WSDL URL to oracle erp applications system team.
    Question --oracle erp team is asking me how they will call my webservice with 2 parameters so that JDBC Table which has 2
                      fields can be passed to my webservice and its parameters.
    2.  If I use JDBC sender adapter scenario --     Please let me know if am doing the things fine
        a. Oracle erp System driver to install at SAP PI system
        b. Connection, host name etc. information will be provided by ERP team that I will use in JDBC sender adapter
    Please let me know for the aboce scenario
    Thnaks

    Hi ,
    If I make Outbound Interface with 2 fields in SAP PI. Publish its Webservice in Service Registry and then
    send its WSDL URL to oracle erp applications system team.
    Question --
    oracle erp team is asking me how they will call my webservice with 2 parameters so that JDBC Table which has 2
    fields can be passed to my webservice and its parameters.  Please let me know
    The below approach is when above webserive is not used.
    2. If I use JDBC sender adapter scenario -- Please let me know if am doing the things fine
    a. Oracle erp System driver to install at SAP PI system .
        Question -- If I install Oracle erp System JDBC driver in SAP PI system then what is  use of ora14jdbc.jar.
                             Do i need to that also. Please let me know.

  • Load-balancing issues with iPlanet and multiple clusters

    We're in performance test of a large-scale clustered deployment based on WLS 5.1sp10.
    Due to scalability/functionality issues, some of which we've seen firsthand and
    some of which we've been informed of by associates as well as BEA representatives,
    we've chosen to implement multiple clusters with a maximum of three nodes each.
    These clusters will be fronted by a web server tier consisting of iPlanet servers
    using the proxy plugin.
    Due to hardware constraints (both in test and in production), however, we've configured
    the iPlanet servers to route across the multiple clusters. In our test environment,
    for instance, we've got a single iPlanet server routing across two 3-node clusters,
    and the configuration in obj.conf is as follows:
    <Object name="application" ppath="*/application">
    Service fn="wl-proxy" \
    WebLogicCluster="clusterA_1:9990,clusterB_1:9991,clusterA_2:9990,clusterB_2:9991,clusterA_3:9990,
    clusterB_3:9991" \
    CookieName="ApplicationSession"
    </Object>
    Our issue is that the load-balancing doesn't appear to work across the clusters.
    We're seeing one cluster get about 90% of the load, while the other receives
    only 10%.
    So, the question (finally!) is: Is this configuration correct (i.e., will it
    work according to the logic of the proxy plugin), and is it appropriate for this
    situation? Are there other alternative approaches that anyone can recommend?
    Thanks in advance,
    cramer

    I use weblogic6.1 with sp2+windows 2000.I develop a web application and deploy
    it to cluster.Through HttpClusterServlets proxy of weblogic I found that a server
    in cluster almost get 95% of requests but another only get 5% of requests.Why???
    I don't set any special parameter.And the weight of the two clustered server is
    equal.I use round-robin arithmetic.
    Thanks!
    "cramer" <[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    We're in performance test of a large-scale clustered deployment based
    on WLS 5.1sp10.
    Due to scalability/functionality issues, some of which we've seen firsthand
    and
    some of which we've been informed of by associates as well as BEA representatives,
    we've chosen to implement multiple clusters with a maximum of three nodes
    each.
    These clusters will be fronted by a web server tier consisting of iPlanet
    servers
    using the proxy plugin.
    Due to hardware constraints (both in test and in production), however,
    we've configured
    the iPlanet servers to route across the multiple clusters. In our test
    environment,
    for instance, we've got a single iPlanet server routing across two 3-node
    clusters,
    and the configuration in obj.conf is as follows:
    <Object name="application" ppath="*/application">
    Service fn="wl-proxy" \
    WebLogicCluster="clusterA_1:9990,clusterB_1:9991,clusterA_2:9990,clusterB_2:9991,clusterA_3:9990,
    clusterB_3:9991" \
    CookieName="ApplicationSession"
    </Object>
    Our issue is that the load-balancing doesn't appear to work across the
    clusters.
    We're seeing one cluster get about 90% of the load, while the other
    receives
    only 10%.
    So, the question (finally!) is: Is this configuration correct (i.e.,
    will it
    work according to the logic of the proxy plugin), and is it appropriate
    for this
    situation? Are there other alternative approaches that anyone can recommend?
    Thanks in advance,
    cramer

  • Differences between Product Version SAP ERP 2005 and SAP ECC 6.0

    Hello Guys,
    I have to setup an new XI interface between two R/3 system. During Integration Scenario setup you have to select under Application Component Type the Product version for the R/3 systems.
    Now, i am able to select SAP ERP 2005 or SAP ECC 6.0 from menu
    Could someone tell me the differences between SAP ERP 2005 and SAP ECC 6.0. Both are listed as Product Versions.
    Thanks in advance!
    Jochen

    SAP ECC 6.0 is latest version 2005 is last year version . as you are intergatin between 2 . you need select accordingly our source and target.
    let me know you still require any doubt
    Thanks
    Sreeram
    Message was edited by:
            Sreeram Reddy

Maybe you are looking for