[ERR]crypto map WARNING: This crypto map is incomplete

i have PIX 501 ver6.3(5) when i setup VPN i get this error message
WARNING:This crypto map is incomplete to remedy the situation add a peer and a valid access-list to this crypto map.
although it seems fine in sh conf command
but tunnel is not started
when i review log i found
sa_request,ISAKMP Phase 1 exchange started

i could successfully establish VPN with another FW cisco 501 6.3
but still can't fix my dilemma which i connect to Huawei Eudemon 500â
sh isakmp
PIX Version 6.3(5)â
interface ethernet0 10full
interface ethernet1 100full
nameif ethernet0 outside security0â
nameif ethernet1 inside security100 â
access-list inside_outbound_nat0_acl permit ip host internal IP host name remote internal IP1â
access-list inside_outbound_nat0_acl permit ip host internal IP host name remote internal IP2â
access-list outside_cryptomap_100 permit ip host internal IP host remote internal IP1â
access-list outside_cryptomap_100 permit ip host internal IP host remote internal IP2 â
global (outside) 1 interfaceâ
nat (inside) 0 access-list inside_outbound_nat0_acl
sysopt connection permit-ipsec
crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-3DES-SHA esp-3des esp-sha-hmac â
crypto ipsec security-association lifetime seconds 3600â
crypto map outside_map 100 ipsec-isakmp
crypto map outside_map 100 match address outside_cryptomap_100â
crypto map outside_map 100 set peer remote peer
crypto map outside_map 100 set transform-set ESP-3DES-SHA
crypto map outside_map 100 set security-association lifetime seconds 3600 kilobytes 1843200â
crypto map outside_map interface outside
isakmp enable outside
â â
isakmp key ******** address remote peer netmask 255.255.255.255 no-xauth no-config-mode â
isakmp policy 20 authentication pre-share
isakmp policy 20 encryption 3des
isakmp policy 20 hash shaâ
isakmp policy 20 group 2â
isakmp policy 20 lifetime 86400â
sh crypto map
Crypto Map: "outside_map" interfaces: { outside }â
Crypto Map "outside_map" 100 ipsec-isakmp
Peer = remote peer
access-list outside_cryptomap_100; 2 elementsâ
access-list outside_cryptomap_100 line 1 permit ip host 10.102.0.11 host remote internal IP1 ââ(hitcnt=14) â
access-list outside_cryptomap_100 line 2 permit ip host 10.102.0.11 host remote internal IP2 ââ(hitcnt=6) â
Current peer: remote peer
Security association lifetime: 1843200 kilobytes/3600 secondsâ
PFS (Y/N): N
Transform sets={ ESP-3DES-SHA, }â
Crypto Map: "set" interfaces: { }â

Similar Messages

WARNING: This crypto map is incomplete

Hi ,
i have ASA with 4 l2l vpn configured. as now am trying to configure new VPN tunnel; while configuring of crypto map set match add its giving me
error like ... WARNING: This crypto map is incomplete
as i have read all the discussion from forms its not effecting ; request you to please help
Thanks
Gajendra

Hi,
This is a normal message and just tells you that you have not yet entered all the "crypto map" commands related to this new connection to make the configuration complete
You will essentially have to make sure that you have ATLEAST the following lines configured
crypto map match address
crypto map set peer
crypto map set ikev1 transform-set
The "transform-set" part might NOT need the "ikev1" depending on your ASAs software level.
- Jouni

When using Craigslist I keep getting this error: Warning! Domain mapping upgrade for this domain not found. Nothing I do works to fix this.

When I use Craigslist, my personal list of things being sold, and I try and renew my listings, I periodically get this: "Warning! Domain mapping upgrade for this domain not found. Please log in and go to the Domains Upgrades page of your blog to use this domain." Usually rebooting my computer makes it go away for a short time, but today that isn't working and following the commands on the warning doesn't work either...is this truly a firefox issue? How do I fix it.

Clear the cache and the cookies from websites that cause problems.
"Clear the Cache":
*Firefox/Tools > Options > Advanced > Network > Cached Web Content: "Clear Now"
"Remove Cookies" from sites causing problems:
*Firefox/Tools > Options > Privacy > Cookies: "Show Cookies"

Map warning - btm1028 - No incoming links

Hi
I have a simple flat file to flat file map which is not giving me any output. I have the following warnings when i build my solution -
'warning btm1028: The required field "Name" has no incoming link, constant value, or default value.'
'warning btm1028: The required field "Zip" has no incoming link, constant value, or default value.'
'warning btm1000: The map contains no links or destination constant values.'
I'm not sure why this occurs though, as i have clearly linked the source schema nodes to the target and can test the map in visual studio with correct output.
Any idea?
Regards
John

John,
As the error clearly say the required fields Name,Zip doesn't have any value mapped.
May be you're using any conditional fuctiond (like value mapping, logical etc) from source field to these mandatory destination fields. So this conditional fuctionds may not result an output for a condition. Try to give some default value in the properties
of these fields and also use the conditional fucntiods in the map. If the conditional functiods outputs any value then the default values would be overwritten otherwise you will have default value for that field's properties.
If this answers your question please mark it accordingly. If this post is helpful, please vote as helpful by clicking the upward arrow mark next to my reply.

Mapping - Warning while executing

Hi All,
While executing mapping the following waring is getting:
ORA-04091: table %s.%s is mutating, trigger/function may not see it
ORA-02063: preceding line from DBLINK.
The mapping contains one filter & expression:
We had created function to get max_date from target table A
We are using the above function to filter the records by using this formula UPDATE>(MAX_DATE-30) to filter the records for last 30 days and load into the Target Table A
In exprression level we are converting Char datatype to Varchar2 datatype.
Regards,
Edited by: [email protected] on Jul 16, 2009 11:40 PM

If you have the get_max_date function being used in an expression within the mapping, then this date can change during the course of the load which is problematic from a logial perspective.
What you need to do is get the function out of the main generated DML statement.
To do that, create a constant operator and set the value to your get_max_date function, then use the constant in the logic of the ETL. In generated code the constant will be created as a package constant which is initialized once and only once when the mapping first gets called and this value is then locked for the duration of the mapping.
Oh! And check to ensure that this IS what is causing the problem. Is there a trigger on your target table which could be raising the error?
Mike

After Upgrade to IOS 6.1, find my iPhone's map cannot see the street or city, especially in China, can we change back to google map in this app?

After Upgrade to IOS 6.1 also with "find my iPhone" app, the map when locate my iphone cannot see the street or city, especially in China, can we change back to google map in this app?
If the map cannot show details, how can we find my iphone? And it seem Apple just have an good idea for customer only but it is not function, why need to use Apple map in "Find my Iphone" if we all know it is not a good map!
So stupid Apple!!!!!

https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/google-maps/id585027354?mt=8
It won't help find your iPhone, however.

Im trying to find out were I can go and submit a email to add to all the other people who cannot stand this new maps app. I want the google app back now or they need to make it the exact same. I hate that you have to close it out and redo the whole direct

Hello. Ive never even wanted to use my time to do this. But this maps app is absolutly discusting. There are a couple cool things but for the most part its horrible. I drive for a living. So I use maps app all the time. This has affected how I do my job. Ill either get a android phone soon if apple doesnt fix this problem. I dont like that you have to redo your directions each time you shut your phone off instead of starting off were your current position is. I dont like that you cant swipe to the next turn you have to make so you can see ahead. I have no use for the 3D option. Thats cool for some and I understand that. But please take it back it to the way the old maps worked but keep the voice navigation. I do like the maps sceem. But people if this is not were I need to post this please let me know. email [email protected] email me people please if you can help me or tell me were to find were I can email apple so they can see this complaint. I dont want to sound like a complainer cause im not. I just dont like this new maps app. I love apple products. IOS is awesome.

http://www.apple.com/feedback
They are actively working to improve the Apple Maps app.
It is extremely unlikely that you will get the Google Maps app back, as the built in app. Google may release an app one day in the app store.
You can alos look for other Map apps in the app store.

Google maps don't display right, part is good but about half of it says "we are sorry, but we don't have maps at this zoom level for this region." Zooming out doesn't help.

When displaying a Google map I get about four vertical strips that alternately display good and in gray bands. The gray area displays the message "we are sorry, but we don't have maps at this zoom level for this region." Zooming out doesn't get rid of the gray areas.
I've had this problem for over a year and get around it by using either MS Internet Explorer or Google Chrome which work Ok. Otherwise Firefox works fine and I use it for everything else except Google Maps.
I've tried an uninstall of FireFox and then reinstall but it didn't help. I don't remember what I was doing when this problem first showed up.

You're welcome

Require a Message mapping for this Logic.

Hi Experts,
I require a Message mapping for this Logic.
In the Source there are 4 fields and, the Target side, the fields should appear like this.
Source Structure- File
Record
|-> Header
Order_No
Date
|-> Item
Mat_No
Quantity
Target Structure-IDoc
IDoc
|-> Header
|-> Segment
Delivery_Order_No
Recv_Date
|-> Item
|-> Segment
Delivery_Order_No
Material_Num
Recv_Quantity.
The Logic is for every Order number an IDOC is generated.And if the Material num matches then the quantity should be added. and important note is that the material numbers are different for every order number. That means if a material number is 2 in the order number A. Then the material number can never be 2 in any of the order numbers.Here is the following with an example for the above scenario.
For example:-
we have
Source Structure- File
Order-no Date Mat_No Quantity
1 01/02/2011 A 10
1 01/02/2011 B 15
1 01/02/2011 A 10
2 01/02/2011 C 10
2 01/02/2011 C 10
3 01/02/2011 D 20
3 01/02/2011 D 10
3 01/02/2011 E 25
Target Structure-IDoc
Delivery_Order_No Recv_Date Material_Num Recv_Quantity
1 01/02/2011 A 20
1 01/02/2011 B 15
2 01/02/2011 C 20
3 01/02/2011 D 30
3 01/02/2011 E 25
So for this example total of 5-Idocs created. That means for this example if Order_No is 1 When the Mat_No is A the quantity gets added. For this Scenario 1 IDoc with four Fields 2 in Header(Delivery_Order_No, Recv_Date) and 2 in Item(Material_Num, Recv_Quantity) is generated by adding the quantity field in the Target Side. Similarly if Order_No is 1 when the Mat_No is B then separate IDoc is generated with four Fields 2 in Header(Delivery_Order_No, Recv_Date) and 2 in Item(Material_Num, Recv_Quantity) in the Target Side. Similarly, if Order_No is 2 when the Mat_No is C, an IDoc is generated with four Fields 2 in Header(Delivery_Order_No, Recv_Date) and 2 in Item(Material_Num, Recv_Quantity) by adding the quantity field in the Target Side. ike wise the process goes on upto 3.Kindly do the needy..
Thanq very much in advance..
Edited by: Prashanth Bharadwaj on Oct 17, 2011 1:29 PM

Hi Prashanth,
Concatinate the two fields OrderNo and MaterialNo and follow the below logic which will resolve your problem.
concatinationOfOrderNo&MaterialNo>removecontext>sort>splitByValueChange>collapseContext-->IDOC
concatinationOfOrderNo&MaterialNo>removecontext>sort>splitByValueChange>collapseContext>splitByEachValue>subString(0,1)-->Delivery_Order_No
formatByExample>collapseContext>SplitByEachValue-->Recv_Date
FormatByExample:
input1:resulrOfSortByKey
input2:concatination>removecontext>sort-->SplitByValuChange
sortByKey:
input1:concatination-->removecontext
input2:date-->removecontext
concatinationOfOrderNo&MaterialNo>removecontext>sort>splitByValueChange>collapseContext>splitByEachValue>subString(1,1)-->Material_Num
formatByExample>sum>Recv_Quantity
FormatByExample:
input1:sortByKey
input2:concatination>removecontext>sort-->SplitByValueChange
SortByKey:
input1:concatination-->removecontext
input2:Quantity-->removeContext
Regards,
Priyanka.

How did Apple screw up the maps app this badly?

I am normally not a complainer, but rather appreciate great technology.
However, I am shocked beyond description about how badly Apple screwed up the maps application in IOS 6.
The maps application is the by far the most frequently used and most useful iphone application for me.
I rely on it all the time. It WAS so incredibly easy to use, and almost always dependable.
Yes, turn-by-turn directions would be nice, but not at the cost of screwing up so many other critical features.
I have now had 2 extremely frustrating experiences.
The other night, I was driving home from work and using the maps application to route to a store. I was using the voice instruction mode. There was heavy traffic so I wanted to zoom out / around to look for alternate routes. Well, this is almost impossible to do, and furthermore, there is much less accurate and detailed information about traffic conditions. This would have been a piece of cake with the old maps application.
Yesterday, I had to make a trip to Pacific Sales in San Jose.I tried "Pacific" with the mapped zoomed to the general area, and it could not find it.Then I tried "Pacific sales", again no luck. Its an appliance store, so I tried "appliances", and again no luck.
Finally, I had to log into the web, go to google maps, and find it there.
It was slow, but it worked!
1 month ago, I had the highest confidence in Apple due to their track record of deliverying great stuff that works and is easy to use.
I would never have considered an android phone.
However, this problem with the maps app has so shaken my confidence in Apple, that I will go today to look at a Samsung Galaxy III.
Maybe its not going to be my thing, but I hope Apple realizes how big they screwed up.
The Apple of Steve Jobs would never, ever, ever have let this happen.
The old Apple would have stayed with Google Maps for another year, and made this new maps app better, more reliable, and more user friendly than Android BEFORE releasing it. It would have been revolutionarily good and would have surprised us with how good it was.
I really truly love Apple and its products.
But this is a really bad mistake and I am so fearful that its an omen of whats to come in future from Apple.
I would not be surprised if this very deeply damages Apple at a time when the competition is getting tougher & tougher.
Of all the functions on the Apple Iphone, the maps are the heart and soul. Apple is probably right to go its own way eventually, but not like this!
It is just going to drive people into the arms of Android.
I am just curious, did Apple actually test this thing thoroughly before releasing it?
I mean, it took me only a few days to figure out this thing is total crap.
How did Apple not know this (which is a very scary thought), or maybe even more scary, maybe they did know but feel they have enough market power to get away with it? I can't think of any other explanations. So, which is it? Either way, its very bad news for Apple fans.

Ok, 3 more wonderful IOS 6 maps experiences to share!
When out shopping for paints, decided to visit Kelly Moore.
Used the maps app and used it to take me to the nearest store, except it was not where maps said it would be!
I called the Kelly Moore store, and they told me the maps app has the wrong town, and they have had many customers with the same problem!
Next up, I was looking for a Sherwin Williams store in San Jose, so maps took me to El Camino Real, except it took me to the wrong end of El Camino Real in Santa Clara, about 15 minutes from the right destination in Mountain View! In fact, the app took me to Santa Clara University!
Last up, I was looking for a Chevron station. Apps routed me to the location, but no gas station.
So, I finally decide to use google maps through the browser, and it ends up it was again the right address but wrong city!!!!
Unbelievable! My confidence in Apple has been further shaken, to where I am about to give up.
I just can't trust their app, which is something I depend on every day to save me time, money and gas.
So disappointed in Apple right now... It makes antenna gate look like a minor incident, which it was in my opinion!

HT5313 It doesn't appear that Apple Maps replaces Google Maps in this update. Am I correct?

It doesn't appear that Apple Maps replaces Google Maps in this recent software update. Am I correct?

Hepvill wrote:
Ah...of course. Just updated my iPad and am really disappointed about Apple Maps. Thanks for setting me straight.
Maybe try the iPad forums.
Pete

My time machine 3 TB HD was encryption enabled and it took forever. I tried reformattiing, it is online, but, get this Partition map repair failed while adjusting structures to fit current whole disk size. Any comments appreciated.

My time machine 3 TB HD was encryption enabled and it took forever. I tried reformattiing, it is online, but, get this Partition map repair failed while adjusting structures to fit current whole disk size. Any comments appreciated.

This issue has been in discussion (actively) since last August here:
https://discussions.apple.com/thread/4218970?start=0&tstart=0
After months and months of new reports, it's pretty clear that this is an Apple Mountain Lion problem and one that Apple needs to address. As one frsutrated user noted :
>>There is no consistent solution for a user. Apple has to supply it. All you can do is submit a bug report to
>> http://www.apple.com/feedback
Please, if you are encountering this problem you will save yourself a lot of wasted time and energey simple by joining me and others in asking Apple to fix this problem: Make a bug report.
Thanks!

IOS6 update Maps do noy integrate or work properly with Rocanda Land Tracker Does anyone have a solution to this horrible map upgrade?

Installed the IOS6 Uodate on both my Iphone and Ipad.
Have found the Rocanda LSD finder and land tracker apps to not integrate with maps properly.
I use these applications constantly as I am a driver in the oilfield.
This update has made my Rocanda useless. It will not save a converted LSD location
and use another LSD location to show directions on the maps.
This used to work perfectly and was a valuable tool.
Can anyone tell me how to repair this?

Speaking as someone who happens to be named Michael Broughton ;), let me note that I did not depend on trying to parse the OWB runtime repository to determine the last run status for a given mapping. I used a set of our own tables that we use to audit various processes that run against our database.
Similar to you, we had the notion of a master process and sub-processes. So, our load could be described as:
Insert master process row with status "Started".
For each mapping to execute:
insert a sub-process row with status "started"
if the last run of the master process ran to "COMPLETE", or the last run of this master process ran to "FAILED" but there is no row for this sub-process with status "COMPLETE", then we need to run the process. run it and update the sub-process row with the return status. If status <> OK, then update master process to status "FAILED" and exit.
otherwise, If we determined that the mapping did not need to be executed, then update the sub-process row with status "COMPLETE"
We put in the stubs for the processes whether we need to run them or not so that if the load fails multiple times, each run will contain the complete list of mappings that were completed.
In point of fact, if you insert the stubs when skipping over mappings during a restart then you can condense the "do I need to run this time" logic to: Run allways unless the last master process run failed but this process succeeded.
How you want to code that query will depend entirely on how you are saving your data.
Hope this helps. I'd offer code snippets but I away from my work 'puter 'til next week.
Mike

Map.get(K) and Map.get(Object)

When I first saw the new 2.0 generics compiler, I was very pleased to see that the signature of Map.get() has changed (since 1.3) from:
    interface Map<K,V> { V get(Object obj); }to:
    interface Map<K,V> { V get(K key); }because it means buggy code like this:
    Map<File,Integer> fileSizeMap = new HashMap<File,Integer>();
    Integer sizeOfFile = fileSizeMap.get("/tmp/foo");
    if (sizeOfFile == null) {
        System.err.println("File not found in map");
    }(where I have mistakenly called Map.get() with a String rather than a File) will now get a compiler error rather than a fault raised several months after the application has gone live.
So, as I say, I am very pleased with the new signature for Map.get(), although I would also like to see the following methods changed:
    boolean containsKey(Object)   -> boolean containsKey(K)
    boolean containsValue(Object) -> boolean containsValue(V)
    V remove(Object object)       -> V remove(K)However, I just read on http://cag.lcs.mit.edu/~cananian/Projects/GJ/Bugs/v20/map.html that Neal Gafter says that putting Map.get(K) into 2.0 was a mistake, and that it will be put back to Map.get(Object) in the next version.
I do hope I haven't missed something obvious, but keeping these methods with Object parameters seems to me to be a backwards step from the excellent type safety benefits provided by Generics.
Does anyone else agree with me that having get(K) would be beneficial in allowing the compiler to identify bugs that would otherwise only be discovered much later?
Or, could someone explain to me why having get(Object) is preferable, and whether this reason is more important than the type safety issue I identified in my example code above?
Many thanks in advance
Geoff

Gafter wrote:
The reason the argument type is Object and not K is that existing code depends on the fact
that passing the "wrong" key type is allowed, causes no error, and simply results in the
key not being found in the map.But "existing code" does not use Generics, and therefore as with all other non-generic code, the authors of that code can choose to either leave it as it is (in which case their Maps will become Map<Object,Object> and Map.get() will then take an Object), or to upgrade it to Generics, and take advantage of the helpful compiler messages that may highlight some design flaws in the original code.
In Jakarta Commons Collections (this is "existing code"), there's a class MultiHashMap which extends HashMap. When you call MultiHashMap.put(someKey, someValue) it appends someValue to an ArrayList that gets stored as the value in the HashMap. However when you call MultiHashMap.get(someKey), it returns a Collection of values, rather than just a single value.
If they try to upgrade MultiHashMap to Generics, they are going to come up with a problem: they would be needing something like this:
    public class MultiHashMap<K,V> extends HashMap<K,V> {
        public V put(K key, V value) { ... }
        public Collection<V> get(K key) { ... }
    }which of course is not allowed, since Map<K,V>.get() returns V, not Collection<V>.
Now, I don't hear anyone saying: This "existing code" relies on Map.get() returning an Object, so in Generics we're going to make Map.get() return Object rather than V.
No, instead we (correctly) say: That MultiHashMap code was wrong to abuse the flexibility provided by the use of Object as the return value of Map.get(), and if it wishes to use Generics, it will either need to become MultiHashMap<K,Object>, or if it insists on being MultiHashMap<K,V>, it will not be allowed to extend HashMap.
I really don't see the problem in using Generics (and a typesafe Java Collections API) as a means of highlighting problems in existing code. As I said before, existing code will continue to work as before, because List will become List<Object> and Map will become Map<Object,Object>.
This is no worse than "accidentally" trying to get() with a key of the right
type but the wrong value. Since none of these methods place the key into the
map, it is entirely typesafe to use Object as the method's parameter.Suppose for a moment that when String.endsWith() was first written, it took an Object parameter instead of a String. If I were to say to you: This method needs to change its parameter from Object to String, would you tell me that that there's no need to make the change, because a String can only ever end in a String, and so it is entirely typesafe to use Object as the method's parameter?
Geoff

What is difference between Service map iview and Workset Map iview

Hi Experts,
Can anyone tell me the difference between service map iView and Workset Map iView.
When I am creating these iViews, its seams both are same. I canu2019t find difference still, can anyone help me out of this
Thanks in Advance
Janardhan

Hi,
Service Map Iview:The Service Map iView is an ERP-specific variant of the portal Workset Map iView. It serves as a central point of entry and guided access to the services of SAP service modules such as the Manager Self Service (MSS) module, or the Employee Self Service (ESS) module.
Workset Map iview:A Workset Map is the equivalent of a site map, providing users with explicit information on the functionality that is available in a given workset. It is based on an iView, and serves as a central point of entry and guided access to the contents of a workset.
if you want to more info pls go thr the below thread
Workset Map iView
i hope it will help you
Thanks,
Sreeni.

[ERR]crypto map WARNING: This crypto map is incomplete

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for