Error in quantity/value determination in condition type P101

Dear experts ,
I am getting bthe following message in the condition type analysis in PO for the condition type P101 . I want to know from where does the sysytem pick th value of the said condition in PO . Further , I observe that the system in NOT picking up the MAP/ SP of the material . It takes some other value . In some cases even if the MAP exists the system picks the value as "0.00 " for the said condition type in PO .
Please guide
Regards
Anis

Dear Experts ,
P101 condition type is not picking the MAP value in PO . It sometimes takes 0.00 or some other value other than MAP . Please tell me what could be wrong ?
Regards
Anis

Similar Messages

217 Error in quantity/value determination

Hi experts,
In my pricing procedure the condition type VPRS is showing 0 value.
In analysis it is showing error: 217 Error in quantity/value determination.
Can you please tell what can be the problem? How dose VPRS work? I only know that VPRS is taken from the material master.
Regards
Fan

Hi
VPRS retrives the cost of the Material from the material master data > Accounting 1 tab to the Sales order.
Once the cost is found, then Profit margin (Net value - cost) is calculated.
VPRS does not contain any Access sequence.
With the help of its Condition category "G", it accesses the Material master > Accounting tab 1 and takes cost.
There may be two cost specified in the Material master. They are
- Moving Avarage Price
- Standard Price
Which one system will consider that depends upon the "Price control" field.
If the value is "V' in the Price control field, the system takes the "Moving Avarage Price" and if it is "S", then system takes the "Standard Price".
So, you must ensure these few control
- VPRS should NOT have any Access sequence.
- Condition category "G" must have been assigned to VPRS.
- VPRS must have been activated as "Statistical" condition in the Pricing Procedure and should not have any Account key.

Error in Quantity Value Determination

Hi all,
I am creating an invoice with respect to an intercompany PO. In the invoice, I am getting an error "Mandatory condition VPRS missing". When I check the analysis, I could see a message "Error in Quantity Value Determination"
In the preceeding PO, when I checked the P101 Condition type, it also displays the same message "Error in Quantity Value Determination". However, when the value of P101 is manually maintained, --> PO saved --> invoice cancelled and --> Invoice recreated, no error in SD invoice is seen. Evident that problem is in MM.
Please share your views and help me in solving this issue
Regards,
Rajesh

Dear Jürgen and Praveen,
Material master valuation price is maintained. What actually the error "Error in Quantity Value Determination" mean?
Regards,
Rajesh

Error in Quantity/Value Determination : VPRS (IV)

Gurus,
When I am creating an IV (Intercompany Invoice), I am getting an error in VPRS determination in pricing. VPRS is not getting determined and it throws up an error saying "Error in Quantity/Value determination" (Error number 217)
Need you help on the same
Regards
Leo

Lakshmipathi,
Pricing procedure is defined as you indicated. It is all standard. VPRS is getting determined for other materials for IV. Only for this specific material it is a problem.
The error says as below
Diagnosis
"This condition has not been determined using condition records. The amount or value should be determined from another data source. For cost (condition category 'G') it is read using conditions from the material valuation segment, for a cash discount condition it is read using conditions from the terms of payment table.
In this transaction an error occurs - the material valuation segment or the terms of payment table could not be read or a currency translation has failed."
Any idea
Regards
Leo

Not possible to determine a condition type for the price in ME49

Hi,
While saving the price in ME49 i.e. comparision of Quotation i am getting below error:
Not possible to determine a condition type for the price
Message no. 06657
Diagnosis
When it attempted to generate the time-dependent conditions for the price you entered, the system was unable to determine a condition type. Price determination is therefore not possible.
Procedure
Contact your system administrator.
The latter can maintain the calculation schema assigned to the purchasing document using the Implementation Guide (IMG).
Utsav

Hi Utsav,
You can refer to the following link. it might be useful to you
RFQ price
Thanks
Nisha

Automatic determination of Condition type value

Hi Friends,
I have one requirement here as described below.
In pricing procdure, I have defined 3 condition types for 3 types of taxes i.e. GST, HST and PST as per client requirement. The value of each condition type is fixed i.e. GST=5% of Gross, HST=7% of Gross, and PST=11% gross. These condition types are not applicable always in the PO. My requirement is when user selects any condition type, then system should calculate the condition type amount and value automatically.
Ex. Suppose the purchase price of a material is 100 USD. In the PO, if user selects GST condition type, then 5% should be determined automaticall in the condition type amount and condition type should be calculated accordingly i.e. 5 USD. One important thing is to note that these condition types will be selected by user as per their requirement and the corresponding % of the condition type should be determined automatically.
Please advice.
Thanks & regards
Satya

Hi Satya,
You can achieve this using access sequence.
1. Create one Access Seq or use Existing seq in your system
transaction code OLME
Purchasing --> condition --> Define Price determination proces --> Define Access Seq
2. Transaction M/06 (Condition Type)
Select your condition code (say ZGST) and click onthe detail view.
Assign the Access Seq to this Condtion
In the Manual Entries Field Assign 'C' for manual entry priority.
save the entries.
3. MEK1 - Create Condition Records
Depending upon your access sequence priorties, define the condtion 'ZGST' with its rate applicable.
similarly maintain the other condition code.
After that create Purchase order. In condtion tab, whenever you enter either of these condition system will take the rate from condition records.
Hope it solve ur issue.
Regards,
S Anand

Incorrect value for condition type P101 in Stock Transport order

Hello Friends,
We have a scenario where in transfering material from one plant to another using the STO way , the excise duty from the sending plant should be loadded on the inventory of the receiving plant.
In this scenario the excise duty X% is calculated on the condition type P101 (which is the standard price or the moving average price from the material master accounting view)
Giving below a sample cas e for the error occuring:-
- Suppose a material M1 has stock of 5,00,000 EA of total value 2,03,707.16 inr , thus the moving average price calculated by the system is 0.41 inr per unit.
- When i try to create the Stock transport order for this material the P101 condition value now appears as 2,05,000 inr for same 5,00,000 Quantity
If we check the difference between the material master value and condition value their is a difference of 1292.84
As mentioned the excise duty(X%) is now getting calcuated on 2,05,000 . When we do post goods issue against the delivery created for the stock transport order the inventory value posted is from the material master i.e 2,03,707.16 , but the excise value are calculated on 2,05,000 in the Purchase.
This difference in value between the condition P101 in PO and the actual inventory posting value is resulting in incorrect calcuation of the excise duty.
can some help me regarding this issue.
regards,

Dear Gundam,
This might accured due to the rounding off problem, so please chek the rounding off condition type is available in the invoice or not.
If not plaese maintain the rounding off condition type sames as in the sales order then try.
I hope this will help you,
Regards,
Murali.

Condition value of Tax condition type gets added to Total Value in Contract

Hi All,
I'm currently investigating an issue where there are 2 line items in an SAP Sales Contract. There is a human error in the second line where the billing end date is less than billing start date in the billing plan. Consequently, the second line has null Outgoing target value.
However, the header Total value in the Contract gets wrongly calculated as Basic condition value of 1st line + Condition value of tax condition type of line one due to this.   When I modify the billing end date for the second line item to be a date greater than the billing start date, the above problem disappears and the total value of the contract does not include the tax component.
For eg.
Normal Error free Contract
Total Value at Header =   700.00 EUR
                   Material          Outgoing Target val
Item 0010    MAT1               450.00                          ( 450 + 50 (tax ) )
Item 0020    MAT2               150.00
Contract with billing plan error in second line
Total value at Header =   550.00 EUR
                        MAterial       Outgoing target val
Item 0010         MAT1             450.00                    ( 450 + 50 (tax ) )
Item 0020         MAT2              0.00
Any inputs would be most welcome.
Regards,
Venkatesh.
Edited by: Venkatesh Gopalarathnam on Jan 24, 2012 9:48 AM

No, i didn't.
Actually, i enter condition type and amount in sales order manually.
At that time my program which i modified at 'Define And Assign Pricing Procedures' in IMG should be run.
But the result of running is different from my purpose.
To change Condition value of condition type in sales order, are there any solution?

Function module to change the value for pricing condition type

Hello experts,
I want to change the value for pricing condition type for an item in the transaction CRMD_ORDER.
I used many function modules but none are working.
Please kindly suggest a function module that will change the value for a condition type .
I have used the following function module but its not working, please correct the coding if anything needs to be changed or added. Please help me .
Thank you.
CLEAR PRCD_COND.
     SELECT SINGLE * FROM PRCD_COND WHERE KPOSN = WA_ORDERADM_I-GUID AND
                                          KSCHL = COND_TY.
IF SY-SUBRC = 0.
*    MOVE-CORRESPONDING PRCD_COND TO L_COND_CHG.
*    CLEAR L_COND_CHG-KBETR.
    L_COND_CHG-STUNR = PRCD_COND-STUNR.
    L_COND_CHG-KBETR = COND_PRC.
*    L_COND_CHG-KSCHL = COND_TY.
    INSERT L_COND_CHG INTO TABLE T_COND_CHG.
L_HEAD_GUID = CRMD_ORDERADM_H-GUID.
L_ITEM_GUID = WA_ORDERADM_I-GUID.
INSERT L_HEAD_GUID INTO TABLE HEAD_GUID.
INSERT L_ITEM_GUID INTO TABLE ITEM_GUID.
    CALL FUNCTION 'CRM_ORDER_READ'
     EXPORTING
       IT_HEADER_GUID                    = HEAD_GUID
       IT_ITEM_GUID                      = ITEM_GUID
     IMPORTING
       ET_ORDERADM_H                     = LT_ORDERADM_H
       ET_ORDERADM_I                     = LT_ORDERADM_I
       ET_PRIDOC                         = IT_PRIDOC_RD
       ET_DOC_FLOW                       = T_DOC_FLOW
*     CHANGING
*       CV_LOG_HANDLE                     =
*     EXCEPTIONS
*       DOCUMENT_NOT_FOUND                = 1
*       ERROR_OCCURRED                    = 2
*       DOCUMENT_LOCKED                   = 3
*       NO_CHANGE_AUTHORITY               = 4
*       NO_DISPLAY_AUTHORITY              = 5
*       NO_CHANGE_ALLOWED                 = 6
*       OTHERS                            = 7
    IF SY-SUBRC <> 0.
* MESSAGE ID SY-MSGID TYPE SY-MSGTY NUMBER SY-MSGNO
*         WITH SY-MSGV1 SY-MSGV2 SY-MSGV3 SY-MSGV4.
    ENDIF.
MOVE-CORRESPONDING LS_PRIDOC_RD TO L_PRI_COND.
INSERT L_PRI_COND INTO TABLE PRI_COND.
LOOP AT IT_PRIDOC_RD INTO LS_PRIDOC_RD.
MOVE-CORRESPONDING LS_PRIDOC_RD TO L_PRIDOC_CHG.
L_PRIDOC_CHG-PRIC_COND = PRI_COND.
L_PRIDOC_CHG-REF_GUID = LS_PRIDOC_RD-GUID.
L_PRIDOC_CHG-COND_CHANGE = T_COND_CHG.
INSERT L_PRIDOC_CHG INTO TABLE PRIDOC_CHG.
ENDLOOP.
LOOP AT LT_ORDERADM_H INTO LS_ORDERADM_H .
MOVE-CORRESPONDING LS_ORDERADM_H TO L_HEADER.
INSERT L_HEADER INTO TABLE HEADER.
ENDLOOP.
LOOP AT LT_ORDERADM_I INTO LS_ORDERADM_I.
MOVE-CORRESPONDING LS_ORDERADM_I TO L_ITEM.
INSERT L_ITEM INTO TABLE ITEM.
ENDLOOP.
L_FIELD-FIELDNAME = 'STUNR'.
INSERT L_FIELD INTO TABLE FIELD.
L_FIELD-FIELDNAME = 'KBETR'.
L_FIELD-CHANGEABLE = 'X'.
INSERT L_FIELD INTO TABLE FIELD.
L_INPUT-FIELD_NAMES = FIELD.
L_INPUT-REF_KIND = 'E'.
L_INPUT-REF_GUID = LS_PRIDOC_RD-GUID.
L_INPUT-OBJECTNAME = 'PRIDOC'.
INSERT L_INPUT INTO TABLE INPUT.
    CALL FUNCTION 'CRM_ORDER_MAINTAIN'
     EXPORTING
       IT_PRIDOC                     = PRIDOC_CHG
     IMPORTING
       ET_EXCEPTION                  = EXCEPT
     CHANGING
       CT_INPUT_FIELDS               = INPUT.
    IF SY-SUBRC <> 0.
* MESSAGE ID SY-MSGID TYPE SY-MSGTY NUMBER SY-MSGNO
*         WITH SY-MSGV1 SY-MSGV2 SY-MSGV3 SY-MSGV4.
    ENDIF.
REFRESH EXCEPT.
CALL FUNCTION 'CRM_ORDER_SAVE'
EXPORTING
    IT_OBJECTS_TO_SAVE         = HEAD_GUID
*   IV_UPDATE_TASK_LOCAL       = FALSE
*   IV_SAVE_FRAME_LOG          = FALSE
*   IV_NO_BDOC_SEND            = FALSE
*   IT_ACTIVE_SWITCH           =
IMPORTING
   ET_SAVED_OBJECTS           = SAVED
   ET_EXCEPTION               = EXCEPT
   ET_OBJECTS_NOT_SAVED       = UNSAVED
* CHANGING
*   CV_LOG_HANDLE              =
* EXCEPTIONS
*   DOCUMENT_NOT_SAVED         = 1
*   OTHERS                     = 2
IF SY-SUBRC <> 0.
* MESSAGE ID SY-MSGID TYPE SY-MSGTY NUMBER SY-MSGNO
*         WITH SY-MSGV1 SY-MSGV2 SY-MSGV3 SY-MSGV4.
ENDIF.
COMMIT WORK AND WAIT.

Hi,,
To be able to call a function module in an update work process, you must flag it in the Function Builder. When you create the function module, set the Process Type attribute to Update with immediate start
Alternatively u can use this function module.
CRM_STATUS_DATA_SAVE_DB
BAPI_CUSTOMERCRM_CHANGE (If u wish to use a bapi for this).
Also , Let me know what error you got when implementing other function module.Does the function module didnt return any error but still the value is not changed for pricing condition type?

Change the Condition base value in a Condition type.

Hi Experts,
I have a problem because I need to change the condition base value for a condition type. This condition base is calculated as a result of other condition types in the list of pricing Elements. I would need to change the base in order to solve the problem.
Thank you and best regards.

Hi Alberto
if i get it correctly , this is your scenario
condition 1--- price x
condition 1--- price Y
condition 1--- price z
now you want a fourth conddition with base value total of the above 3
if so , you maybe define all the above 3 as statistical ,
in another row , create a total of the above 3,
assign a sub total this ,
create new conditon type and in its alt base value , give the formalue for the sub total
for eg 5 for sub toal 1, 6 for sub total 2
and then you would get the right base value
Hope this helps
Thanks
Akasha

Hide values for certain condition types in Quotation Saleorder and Invoice

Hi All,
I have written code to hide values for certain condition types in LV69AFZZ,
this works fine in the ITEM LEVEL.
But for the same condition types, I could not hide the values in the HEADER LEVEL.
Unless I hide it at header level also, this is useless.
Please guide me how to do it.
Thanks & Regards
Pradeep

Hi,
We have been using FORM USEREXIT_FIELD_MODIFICATION of LV69AFZz for item level & FORM USEREXIT_FIELD_MODIFIC_KOPF of LV69AFZZ for hiding heade level conditions.
I hope this helps,
Regards
Raju chiutale.

RFQ - Header Condition (Not possible to determine a condition type)

Hi,
I have defined my own Condition Schema for RFQ Item Condition are working fine. But when i am trying to add header condition it is giving msg "Not possible to determine a condition type"
Regards

Hi,
I have defined my own Condition Schema for RFQ Item Condition are working fine. But when i am trying to add header condition it is giving msg "Not possible to determine a condition type" and now allowing me to enter the condition on header level.
Regards
Edited by: Kashif Ihsan on Jun 14, 2010 3:52 PM

STO condition type P101

Hi All,
How does STO condition type P101 picks up the supplying plan't material cost (from accounting view) into the STO conditions. There's no access seq for P101 and therefore no cond rec can be maintained...right?
I trying to understand how the material stand cost from material master it pulled into the STO condition type P101?
Thanks in advance

Hi,
In M/06, for condition type P101 (Valuation Price of Supplying Plant), check following;
Cond. class B Prices
Calculat.type C Quantity
Cond.category G Cost
Because of Condition Category "G", Condition Type "P101" picks the MAP or Standard Price of the Material from the Supplying Plant.

No Value in VPRS Condition type

Dear Experts
While preparing a sales order , i am getting zero value against the cond type VPRS.It was working fine until recently this problem has started coming.In the Conditions details , it shows Incative-Inactive via formula of incorrect.
the accounting view in the material master is also maintained.
Your immediate comments for the same are required.

Ensure that "Moving avarage price" or the "Standard price" is maintained in the Material master data in "Accounting 1".
Specify the "Price control" in the MATERIAL MASTER as "V" if you want that system should take the "Moving avarage price" or specify "S" if you want that "Standard price " to be taken.
In the Pricing procedure(V/08), Subtotal should be "B" and Requirement should be "4" for the VPRS condition type.
Activate, the "Determine cost" check box in the Item category for Sales (VOV7).
In the condition type VPRS, ensure that it has "Condition category" G.

Passing values/results between condition type by using the formula

Hi,
I'm having one condition type (A), that is determining a result percentage based on Condition Table A. Based on the percentege determined in Condition Table A, I would like to set a custom field value in the Kondition record structure (KOMP) so that value will be considered within condition type B and accessing condition table B.
So far the only way to set values that I could find was within the Requirement formula associated with condition type B. Are there any other options? And how can I acces the percentage that Condition Type A determined? I looked into all kinds of global tables, but could not find anything.
Thanks a lot for your help!
Doreen

Shivanand,
There's no need to post that much code when you could create a very short test case that demonstrates only the problem you are having.
You're using &NAME. notation on something that isn't a page or application item. You can't reference PL/SQL variables that way (or any other way) outside the PL/SQL scope. For your situation, you could create a page item named P55_DOCID and assign it a value in the PL/SQL process (:P55_DOCID := DOCID;), then reference &P55_DOCID. in HTML areas like the success message.
Scott

Error in quantity/value determination in condition type P101

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for