Error in TRFC queue

Hi all,
A job was loading and in TRFC queue i get an error 'Time Limit Exceeded' and when  i try to execute this queue i get the message that "Request REQU_1N6KJEJGQ3PKKISMS0620YYU4 properly ended; no further processing allowed " and the queue is in error status.
When i check the data target all records have been arrived and the Request is in green status. But in the Total and Technical parameters of the 'Details' tab the status is showing red.
Kindly suggest me possible solutions.
Regards,
Dinesh

Hi
Due to the many processes hitting the same time to the TRFC will get stuck or its processing time exceeds, hence you got the error.
Go to SM58-- Delete Entry -- Run the Load Again.
Hope it helps

Similar Messages

  • TRFC queue needs to be automatically restarted after errors

    transaction SMQS, tRFC queue.  We have documents being sent from the tRFC queue which when an error is encountered, then the tRFC queue needs to be restarted manually.  Is there a way to have this queue restarted automatically after an error is encountered?

    SAP verified no other way than to manually restart this queue....

  • TRFC Queue Error "Unable to interpret BGUA as a number"

    Hi all,
    I am getting the below error message in TRFC queue
    "Unable to interpret BGUA as a number" when i do a datamart dataload from ODS to Cube. ODS is getting data from datasource 0CO_OM_CCA_9. Can anyone help how to resolve this issue?.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Muruganand. K

    What is  BGUA ??
    I think you have mapped this field (BGUA holding infoobject) to number or key figure field.
    Check your  mapping in transformation form ODS to CUBE.
    Hope this helps.

  • IDoc- XI- IDoc - Problem in TRFC-Queue

    Hi everybody,
    in Integration Builder i have created an A2A-Scenario (Idoc->XI->IDoc).
    After designing and configurating i want to send an IDoc to XI.
    But the IDoc stands in the TRFC-Queue with error "no service for system <xxx> client 020 in Integration Directory."
    In ID i have set Business Systems for sender and receiver both with outbound/inbound interfaces of idoc-type, which i have upload from relevant sap-system.
    What is my fault?
    Thanks a lot.
    Greetings
    Joerg Knaust

    hi,
    most probably it's a typo
    there's no sender agreement if you're sending idocs
    from r3 to the xi
    1. how does your service in TCODE - IDX1 look like?
    sapSID ?
    2. adapter specific identifiers (do it step by step):
    /people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/03/29/xi-error--unable-to-convert-the-sender-service-to-an-ale-logical-system
    Regards,
    michal
    <a href="/people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/06/28/xipi-faq-frequently-asked-questions">XI FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions</a>

  • TRFC Queue

    Hi,
    Is there any job that can check the trfc queues for any error entries and remove it automatically so that it process the next one in the queue.
    Regards
    Krish

    > Is there any job that can check the trfc queues for any error entries and remove it automatically so that it process the next one in the queue.
    Using this program you can delete    RSARFCER     Delete various LUWs 
    [http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/25/bcfa40badbf46fe10000000a1550b0/content.htm]
    Thanks
    Siva

  • BD87 hide "idoc entries in tRFC queue" by assigning to status or other meth

    Hi,
    I am working on the inbound side of an idoc interface for message type MATMAS. My problem is that when I enter in BD87 there are more than 400 hundred entries in "idoc entries in tRFC queue". Now, whatever filter I put on the first screen this line appears. Even, if I enter with a specific idoc number. These entries are obviously outbound errors and are completely irrelevant to the interface I am working on but will make the reprocessing screen unnecessarily complicated for the users. So, basically I want to allow the end user to filter out these messages.
    I noticed that the errors "idoc entries in tRFC queue" aren't associated to a status and I was wondering if it is possible to give them a status value and so make them sensitive to a status filter. But if this isn't possible any solution to hide these error messages from the end user would be equally valid.
    I know someone will probably suggest that the best solution would be to remove all old entries from tRFC queue in SM58 and that there shouldn't be so many idoc in entries in the tRFC queue. The problem is that it is not my role to monitor tRFC in production and if it has not been regularly monitored up to now then it probably won't be in the future.
    Many thanks in advance,
    Jamie.

    Hi Jamie,
    To the best of my knowledge the shown outbound RFC entries in BD87 are a feature that cannot be suppressed. I.e. in the coding of BD87 one can see logic where it automatically checks for outbound RFC errors and adds those to the output.
    In general IDoc status 03 should be associated with the outbound RFC errors. Yet, when one sees those in BD87, the IDoc status field is empty. Along your train of thought I had also previously tried to suppress those displayed IDocs by adding a filter for suppressing status 03 or blank status, but nothing helps. And as you correctly point out, even when using BD87 on a single IDoc (e.g. specified via IDoc number), the transaction will still display the outbound RFC errors.
    So unless somebody else has some good idea or insight, I'm afraid you're stuck with that behavior.
    Cheers, harald

  • Problem in TRFC queue (SM58) - IDOC2FILE scenario

    Hi,
    I am executing IDOC2file scenario. In the transaction we19, i have successfully posted the IDOC to external system (XI).
    But the iDOC is still in TRFC queue. (SM58 or BD87).
    <b>Recipient details</b>
    Port : RFC in We21.
    Partner No. : XI logical name.
    Partner Type: Logical system.
    <b>Sender details</b>
    Port : SAPBIW
    (This is the confusing part, I was told that first three letters should be SAP and next three should be SID of the SAP system).
    Is this mandatory. But my TRFC (we21 in BW) didn't have any such port, so i created one.
    Partner No. : BIW logical name.
    Partner Type: Logical system.
    I am getting this error in SM58
    <b>Transaction IDX1: Port SAPBIW, client 001, RFC dest contains error.</b>
    Now i want to know what is the problem because of which IDOC is not being to pushed to XI

    Hi,
    go to sm58 and release or delete  that queue, next time idoc will not stuck in  the queue.
    <i><<<Port : SAPBIW
    (This is the confusing part, I was told that first three letters should be SAP and next three should be SID of the SAP system)Is this mandatory</i>
    It is not mandatory, you can leave this option blank.
    Thanks

  • IDOC Error at TRFC

    I have a problem with an IDCO which is failing at TRFC port. When i see the processing logs of the IDOC for the invoice i can see that "IDOC is successfully generated and sent to R/3" but when i run the trasaction and check the IDOC status there i could see a error message " IDOC error in RFC queue "......So can anyone help me out ??

    I have a problem with an IDCO which is failing at TRFC port. When i see the processing logs of the IDOC for the invoice i can see that "IDOC is successfully generated and sent to R/3" but when i run the trasaction and check the IDOC status there i could see a error message " IDOC error in RFC queue "......So can anyone help me out ??

  • Error while activating Queue XBTR* in Manage Queues in TCODE sxmb_adm

    Hello Experts,
    SAP PI is sending the data to ECC through inbound proxy in PI SXMB_MONI it is showing Black colur flag as it is through but in R3 SXMB_MONI messages  are in green colur flag showing it is in scheduled state.Data is in quues in SMQ2.
    While i try to activate queues in SXMB_ADM it throwing as Error while activating Queue XBTR*
    XBTR Queue is in SMQ2.
    Regards
    Naresh

    Hello Naresh,
    Check if the queue XBTR* is already registered in your SAP R3 server.
    You have to do it first, if not already done.
    Regards,
    Subhajit

  • Error while activating queue XBTI*

    Hi All,
    When I triggered the message i have seen the message in Green Color in MONI.
    there by i went to SMQ2 and have seen the message that is strucked in the queue XBTI0001.
    After that i have deleted the queues from SMQ2 and De-registered the queues and Registered the queues again. in SXMB_ADM
    There by i Activated the Queues in the same screen.
    then i got the Error as Error while activating queue XBTI
    What could be the problem with this activation
    REgards

    Hi Prateek,
    That activation and all is working now,
    but the problem is iam trying to restart the successfully processed messages in MONI through
    this Blog
    Michal Krawczyk's Blog
    The specified item was not found.
    Every thing has been followed as explained in the Blog.
    I took the message ID of the Successfuly processed message from MONI and when i execute the report.
    Each and every time The message is comming to MONI with GREEN Status .
    Then if i goto SMQ2 , ther i can see the queu with the description saying that SYSFail
    and if i manually trying to release the Queue means it is saying Running and immediately turning into the same SYSFail state
    The queue is not at all getting Free.
    This is the problem
    Regards

  • IDOCs in TRFC Queue

    Hi,
    We have a ALE scenario where we send IDOCs to other SAP system.
    The IDOCs we send are sitting in TRFC queues, they are not sent to the target system. I checked all the ALE settings, they are fine. The processing mode is "Immediate".
    When I go to SM58 I will find the entry for the transaction with status "Transaction Recorded". If I select the entry and press F6 (Execute LUW) the IDOC is sent to the target system and the queue becomes empty.
    What I am missing? I dont want to go to SM58 everytime I post an IDOC. I am sure there will be some setting to process the IDOCs from the TRFC queue automatically. Can you please let me know that?
    Regards,
    Ravikanth

    HI,
    the problem is caused by immediately processing.
    Pipeline:
    Outbound Processing -> sender IDOC -> TRFC Queue -> receiver IDOC - Inbound Processing
    In case your are using IP (immediately Processing) at sending side your are using 1 LUW to send it to the TRFC Queue and saving IDOC at receving side -STOP.
    In case your are using IP at both sides .. your are using 1 LUW for the complete Pipe.
    That means this LUW is still open if the IDOc is processed in the receiving system.
    ToDO:
    Go to your Receiving System and check the Processing Settings. Try to use Background Jobs or get higher Batch Processing to avaoid TRF Queue Jam
    Regards,
    Gordon

  • XI Error JCO_SYSTEM_FAILURE.MAPPING: Queue stopped

    In SMQ2, i can see a queue stuck giving error:
    XI Error JCO_SYSTEM_FAILURE.MAPPING: Queue stopped
    when i click it...it leads me to a SXMB_MONI entry..
    which corresponds to a IDOC to File scenario, where a message mapping fails giving the following error,
    <SAP:Category>XIServer</SAP:Category>
      <SAP:Code area="MAPPING">JCO_SYSTEM_FAILURE</SAP:Code>
      <SAP:P1>java.lang.OutOfMemoryError</SAP:P1>
    <SAP:Stack>&quot;SYSTEM FAILURE&quot; during JCo call. java.lang.OutOfMemoryError</SAP:Stack>
      <SAP:Retry>A</SAP:Retry>
    If i try to reEXECUTE the LUW from SMQ2, it again shows the error.......
    how can i solve the problem without delecting the queue

    hi ,
    This error is coming because your message is very large or lots of large xsd files are uploaded in XI
    you need to increase the memory used by JVM for your XI. How to increase the Memory ? for answer go to this blog.
    /people/keerti.nayak/blog/2007/03/05/solving-145out-of-memory146-problem-150-using-jnlp
    hope it will sovle the problem...

  • XI Error ATTRIBUTE_IDOC_RUNTIME.IDOC_ADAPTER: Queue in SMQ2

    Hi XIer's,
    I have an issue while i am doing an  IDOC-to-IDOC  Scenario
    The queues have been stucked in the SMQ2 and when i checked the queue it is showing sys-fail and with this Error : "XI Error ATTRIBUTE_IDOC_RUNTIME.IDOC_ADAPTER: Queue ".
    when i tried to process the queue by executing LUW it is not processing.
    Therefore i request you let me know the reason for this error why it occurred and please let us know how to resolve it.
    Appreciate your quick reply and points will be awarded accordingly.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Ram

    Hi XIer's,
    I have an issue while i am doing an  IDOC-to-IDOC  Scenario
    The queues have been stucked in the SMQ2 and when i checked the queue it is showing sys-fail and with this Error : "XI Error ATTRIBUTE_IDOC_RUNTIME.IDOC_ADAPTER: Queue ".
    when i tried to process the queue by executing LUW it is not processing.
    Therefore i request you let me know the reason for this error why it occurred and please let us know how to resolve it.
    Appreciate your quick reply and points will be awarded accordingly.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Ram

  • Error"XI Error CLIENT_RECEIVE_FAILED.INTERNAL: Queue sto" in SMQ2

    Hi,
    When i am trying to test my JDBC to ABAP Server proxy i am getting the error(XI Error CLIENT_RECEIVE_FAILED.INTERNAL: Queue sto) in SMQ2 please advice me what could be the problem?
    Regards,
    Bhoj

    Hello better you apply LUW on each and every message in SMQ, queues. Else activate and inactivate the messages in the queue by sxmb_adm -> managequeues -> deregisterqueues -> registerqueues -> activate queue.
    And also do if any messages are failed follow the blog to resend the failed messages,
    XI :  How to Re-Process failed XI Messages Automatically

  • Inbound queue error"XI Error APPLICATION_ERROR.ABAP: Queue stopped"

    Hi,
    In  SMQ2 ,we have received inbound queue error "XI Error APPLICATION_ERROR.ABAP: Queue stopped".When activate queue error is not going.So please advice.
    Thanks,
    Praveen

    Hello Mr,
    Have a look into SAP Notes: 824554, 906435, 783515, 910649, 706563.
    /people/sap.user72/blog/2005/11/29/xi-how-to-re-process-failed-xi-messages-automatically
    To be more helpful, can you post here complete error log?

Maybe you are looking for