Error locking table TBTCO

Hi,
We are having issue in locking "Error locking table TBTCO" at our SM12 statics Maximum Number of Lock Owners     3603
Even on increasing the enque/table_size it not effecting the lock owner. Our environment having enq replication server.
The profile parameter for enque/serverinst = $(SCSID) (00)
enque replication server instance number is 10
What could be the correction need to be done?
Regards,
RMav

You have to check the reason for the error in the lock.
Get the Work Process number that logged the error in SM21. Check the trace file of this work proces. At the same timestamp of the error in SM21 you do find the root cause in the work process trace.
Usually this is caused by a overflow in the enqueue table, but not always. For this reason you have to check the work process trace the reasl root cause.
To check if the enqueue is suffering a overflow you should go to SM12 -> Extras -> Statistics
If in the statistics you do find that the "Maximum Fill Level" reached the maximum number of locks in these itens, for example:
Maximum Number of Lock Owners 39481
Maximum Fill level 458                               
Current Fill Level -25
Maximum Number of Lock Arguments 39481  <<<
Maximum Fill level 39480                                 <<<
Current Fill Level 15
Maximum Number of Lock Entries 39481    <<<
Maximum Fill level 39480                             <<<
this means that the enqueue was really suffering under an overflow situation.
Just for your information, the TBCTO is the table for the status of the jobs. So, every job need
to write the status in this table and also lock this table firstly.
Clébio

Similar Messages

  • File to Idoc error:"Lock table overflow"

    When I post 3000 records I see 3000 idocs generated in ECC successfully, when I try to post 4000 idocs I get an error in PI "Lock table overflow" in SM58, please help
    Thanks

    Hi.
    The error could be due to following:
    1. small size of lock table
    2. a particular program sets a large no of locks
    3. an update process hangs hence setting a large number of locks
    please check below thread.
    Lock table overflow
    Also check below link frm help.sap.
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/d3/43d2416d9c1c7be10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm
    Hope this helps.
    Regards,
    Deepak.
    Edited by: Deepak  Shah on Feb 8, 2011 4:48 AM

  • Lock table overflow - Delta (fetch)

    Hi,
    I have an InfoCube which contains large amount of data. Before starting to extract data from this InfoCube, I want to set datamart status as fetched to start extractions with new coming requests.
    However, when I choose the processing mode of DTP as "9 No Data Transfer; Delta Status in Source: Fetched" and execute the DTP, it ends with an error: "Lock table overflow".
    Is there any way to solve this without increasing the lock table parameters (enque/table_size) ?
    Regards,
    Erdem

    You need to first resolve the issue with the "Lock table Overflow"....usign the below method in RZ10.
    Here you can solve the problem in two ways
    1) increase the size of the lock table via parameter
    enque/table_size
    2) or increase the enque work processes from 1 to 2 or 3
    via parameter rdisp/wp_no_enq
    Ask Basis team for their assistance on the same.
    Thanks
    Murali

  • Lock table overflow in SAP

    We are tyring to execute a transaction and it is giving the error Lock table overflow, Though the  enque/table_size parameter is set to 96,000 KB which i guess good enough.
    Can you please suggest.
    Thanks,
    Chandu

    Hello Chandu,
    how many records this transaction is locking?
    SAP Note 746138: Analyzing lock table overflows, describes how to analyze this issue.
    Are you using Standalone enqueue? If that's the case check that the enqueue table size is defined in the ASCS instance.
    kind regards,
    Mercedes

  • Lock table overflow - BRF Plus - can it work with many entries in tables ?

    hi,
    when I'm trying to open expression table in BRFplus with 500 entries in web
    I get an error: Lock table overflow and I see more then 2000 entries in sm12 for fdt_ tables
    and the system cannot create any more locks (so other applications are not working)
    why is that ? can BRF plus work with more then 100 entries in table expressions at all ?
    can anyone tell from experience as this is a huge issue I believe
    thank you,
    Regards,
    Michal Krawczyk

    Hi Michal,
    You are running a NW 701 system. This was the first version of BRFplus and the DB schema was not good for high volumne.
    I have created some notes recommending to use decision table for up to 100 rows (of course other factors like # of columns are also important).
    In NW 702 the DB schema has been changed and decision tables with 10.000 rows are possible and performance better by a factor of 100 and more.
    In your specific case you may consider to increase the number of logs that are possible. But this is rather a workaround than a solution.
    BR,
    Carsten

  • Perl & "Lock table is out of available lock entries"

    Hi,
    i use to retrieve about ten thousand results with ./dbxml,
    but when i use the same query within a perl script,
    i get the error:
    Lock table is out of available lock entries
    Query collection("frwiki_10_0.dbxml")/DOCUMENT/Sentence failed (1)
    Error: Could not fetch next DOM element for doc id: 2, nid: 8CB6 in /Users/francois/Desktop/INRIA/EasyRef2_DBXML/script/../lib/session.pm, line 175
    Database handles still open at environment close
    Open database handle: frwiki_10_0.dbxml/structural_stats
    Open database handle: frwiki_10_0.dbxml/secondary_document_statistics_double
    Open database handle: frwiki_10_0.dbxml/secondary_document_index_double
    Open database handle: frwiki_10_0.dbxml/secondary_document_statistics_string
    Open database handle: frwiki_10_0.dbxml/secondary_document_index_string
    Open database handle: frwiki_10_0.dbxml/node_nodestorage
    Open database handle: frwiki_10_0.dbxml/secondary_document
    Open database handle: frwiki_10_0.dbxml/secondary_dictionary
    Open database handle: frwiki_10_0.dbxml/primary_dictionary
    Open database handle: frwiki_10_0.dbxml/secondary_sequence
    Open database handle: frwiki_10_0.dbxml/secondary_configuration
    Segmentation fault
    Somewhere on other forums, one's talking about Configuring locking: sizing the system & DB_ENV->set_lk_max_locks(),
    but how can I my environment the same way with a perl script?

    I'm configuring my environment in my Java application via this DB_CONFIG file, and it definitely works. When I had problems like you have, I just increased the number of locks, lockers, objects and everything started to work just fine. Are you sure that you have put DB_CONFIG into environment home directory. Did you increase the number of locks, lockers, objects sufficiently?
    Vyacheslav
    UPD. Does your application have enough permissions to read DB_CONFIG file?
    Edited by: detonator413 on Oct 21, 2009 12:33 PM

  • Lock table is out of available locker entries

    My mail server version is -->
    Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server STORE 6.3-0.15 (built Feb 9 2007)
    Not always this thing happened but sometimes, I can find follow error message in deault log file.
    ---- default log --
    [12/May/2009:12:00:00 +0900] epajo01 imdbverify[4106]: General Notice: verify database snapshots started
    [12/May/2009:12:00:00 +0900] epajo01 imdbverify[4106]: General Notice: verify snapshots finished: Total verified 3 Total failed = 0
    [12/May/2009:12:00:01 +0900] epajo01 imexpire[4115]: General Notice: imexpire started, functions: expire purge
    [12/May/2009:12:00:01 +0900] epajo01 imexpire[4115]: General Error: locking error: Lock table is out of available locker entries
    [12/May/2009:12:00:01 +0900] epajo01 imexpire[4115]: General Error: DBERR: can't get locker id for file descriptor 20: Not enough space
    [12/May/2009:12:00:01 +0900] epajo01 imexpire[4115]: Store Critical: Unable to lock index for user/journal_ms08_i: Not enough space
    [12/May/2009:12:00:01 +0900] epajo01 imexpire[4115]: General Error: locking error: Locker does not exist
    [12/May/2009:12:00:01 +0900] epajo01 imexpire[4115]: Store Error: locking {StoreRoot}/=user/02/91/=journal_ms08_i/store.exp: Invalid argument
    [12/May/2009:12:00:01 +0900] epajo01 imexpire[4115]: General Error: locking error: Locker does not exist
    [12/May/2009:12:00:01 +0900] epajo01 imexpire[4115]: Store Critical: Unable to lock index for user/journal_ms08_y: Invalid argument
    [12/May/2009:12:00:01 +0900] epajo01 imexpire[4115]: General Error: locking error: Locker does not exist
    -------- omit ---------
    [12/May/2009:12:00:01 +0900] epajo01 imexpire[4115]: Store Error: locking {StoreRoot}/=user/e1/91/=journal_ms08_g/store.exp: Invalid argument
    [12/May/2009:12:00:01 +0900] epajo01 imexpire[4115]: General Error: locking error: Lock table is out of available locker entries
    [12/May/2009:12:00:01 +0900] epajo01 imexpire[4115]: General Error: locking error: Locker does not exist
    [12/May/2009:12:00:01 +0900] epajo01 imexpire[4115]: General Error: DBERR: can't get locker id for file descriptor 23: Not enough space
    [12/May/2009:12:00:01 +0900] epajo01 imexpire[4115]: Store Critical: Unable to lock index for user/journal_ms08_w: Invalid argument
    [12/May/2009:12:00:01 +0900] epajo01 imexpire[4115]: Store Error: locking {StoreRoot}/=user/73/e5/=journal/store.exp: Not enough space
    [12/May/2009:12:00:01 +0900] epajo01 imexpire[4115]: General Error: locking error: Locker does not exist
    [12/May/2009:12:00:01 +0900] epajo01 imexpire[4115]: Store Error: locking {StoreRoot}/=user/e2/91/=journal_ms08_w/store.exp: Invalid argument
    [12/May/2009:12:00:01 +0900] epajo01 imexpire[4115]: General Error: locking error: Locker does not exist
    [12/May/2009:12:00:01 +0900] epajo01 imexpire[4115]: Store Critical: Unable to lock index for user/journal_ms08_h: Invalid argument
    [12/May/2009:12:00:01 +0900] epajo01 imexpire[4115]: General Error: locking error: Locker does not exist
    [12/May/2009:12:00:01 +0900] epajo01 imexpire[4115]: Store Error: locking {StoreRoot}/=user/f1/91/=journal_ms08_h/store.exp: Invalid argument
    [12/May/2009:12:00:01 +0900] epajo01 imexpire[4115]: General Error: locking error: Locker does not exist
    [12/May/2009:12:00:01 +0900] epajo01 imexpire[4115]: Store Critical: Unable to lock index for user/journal_ms08_x: Invalid argument
    [12/May/2009:12:00:01 +0900] epajo01 imexpire[4115]: General Error: locking error: Locker does not exist
    [12/May/2009:12:00:01 +0900] epajo01 imexpire[4115]: Store Error: locking {StoreRoot}/=user/f2/91/=journal_ms08_x/store.exp: Invalid argument
    [12/May/2009:12:00:01 +0900] epajo01 imexpire[4115]: General Notice: Expire finished
    When I can see this error message in default log files, all emails are enqueued but not dequeued.
    Emails are just piled up in a queue directory, and getting increased.
    To solve this thing, I just restart mail server(with stop-msg, start-msg command) and then emails are dequeued.
    In a web site, I found those error messages can be found when some interrption occurred like Control-c in product using Berkeley DB .
    I know JMS is using Berkeley DB but at that time there is no chance to use Control-c.
    With those log, I just can assum imexpire started when snapshots job is not finished completely(although log file shows snapshots job is finished).
    Imexpire started before snapshots not release locker
    But I am not Sure.
    I don't know why this thing happened and what is solid workaround.
    If someone had the same problem as mine, plz reply
    Thanks in advance.
    Edited by: leeky41 on May 12, 2009 7:22 AM

    leeky41 wrote:
    Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server STORE 6.3-0.15 (built Feb 9 2007) Please always provide the full output of ./imsimta version. I cannot tell for example what platform you are using (Solaris SPARC/x86/Linux).
    I don't know why this thing happened and what is solid workaround.I suggest your first step is to upgrade to a recent release of MS6.3 and see if the problem persists.
    Regards,
    Shane.

  • Lock table is out of available object entries

    hi,
    i am using db4.6.21 version.
    i have created an table where other applications writes to this tables concurrently.
    this table opened in DB_THREAD and every application writing in DB_WRITE_CURSOR mode. and i am note using any Locking subsystems.only READ_COMMITTED and DB_WRITE_CURSOR are used by applications to access the table.
    while In PC it is working properly.
    But in At91SAM9260EK with kerenl 2.6.23.9 ,
    Berkeley DB error: Lock table is out of available object entries
    error comes...what would be the reason..???

    Hi Ratheesh,
    Please search through the forum; similar locking subsystem configuration issues have already been discussed.
    In short, you'll need to increase the number of lock objects:
    http://www.oracle.com/technology/documentation/berkeley-db/db/ref/lock/max.html
    I see you're using the DB_WRITECURSOR flag which is specific to CDS (Concurrent Data Store), so you should size the locking subsystem appropriately to CDS: the number of lock objects needed is two per open database (one for the database lock, and one for the cursor lock when the DB_CDB_ALLDB option is not specified). The locking subsystem configuration should be similar for all the processes accessing the environment, or not specified for the processes that just join the environment.
    If you still see this error message reported, provide some information on your OS/platform, information on how the processes access the environment and the locking statistics (db_stat -N -Co -h <env_dir>).
    Regards,
    Andrei

  • System error: Unable to lock table/view V_T077K_M

    Hi,
    Not able to work on field selection (OMSG) i am getting an error "System error: Unable to lock table/view V_T077K_M" checked in SM 12 also, but dint get there anything.
    please cud you help me in this regard,

    contact your basis team,  there might be an overflow of the lock table because of mass changes from other users (even for other tables)

  • Lock table overflow 1 & Error 7 when sending an IDoc

    dear all,
    we r getting error in purchasing cube for itm datasource
    2lis_o2_itm for delta...
    1.Lock table overflow 1
    2.Error 7 when sending an IDoc
    3.Errors in source system
    when i check in details it is showing :
    Data Package 1 : arrived in BW ; Processing : Selected number does not agree with transferred n
    its daily delta..plz give me solution its urgent....
    at request in manage...we got some records...wat shud  the process..
    Thanks in adv
    pinky reddy
    Edited by: pinky reddy on Apr 8, 2008 7:42 AM

    solved

  • Error  " RFC Status :-  Lock table overflow "in event trace  ( SWEL )

    Hi experts ,
    I will not mention this post as URGENT but you guys can understand the importance as I am in PRD Support of my workflows .
    My Workflow is throughing error in SWEL  , as below   and after error its getting deactivated .
    The workflow is triigering based on the  BO : DRAW and event CREATED .
    Error :  RFC Status           Lock table overflow
    In feedback after error the message is : A system error has occurred in lock management .
    I have resolved the deactivation problem after error  , but   can any body please suggest me  what is the root cause of this error , so that i can try to avoid that error .
    Regards
    Prabhudutta
    Edited by: Prabhudutta Behera on Nov 20, 2008 5:58 AM

    This error I have not faced. i will suggest you to check SWU3 transaction Code and check everything is configured. Also check SM12 and SM58. Also I will ask you to contact the Basis Guys related to this issue. Also check WF-BATCH is having all the authorization required. Try to replicate this from the system where Workflow is working.
    Thanks
    Arghadip

  • MC603 Lock Table Overflow Error in Maintenance Order Settlement

    Hello,
    I am running RKO7KO8G- "Settlement of Maintenance Orders" program in background. For few Orders I am getting "MC603:Lock Table overflow " error. What might be the problem for this?
    Number of Order processed in a job is around 10,000.
    I checked in SM12 table.No entry is found
    Size of the Lock table details is
    Min - 4096
    Max - 102400
    Diff Value - 4096
    Profile Value - 10000
    Current Value - 10000
    Regards,

    Hello Srinivas,
    Please take a look at the below link.
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/37/a2e3ab344411d3acb00000e83539c3/content.htm
    As I already said, there is no standard value to define. You need to consider the no.of locks being generated and act accordingly to address this problem.
    I suggest you please go through the lock management documentation to address this kind of problems in the feature.
    Thanks,
    Siva Kumar

  • Lock table overflow Error in BD91

    Hi Sapper's,
    Can anyone please tell me how to rectify the below error which occurs for me in T-Code - BD91.
    MC603: Lock table overflow in T-Code BD91
    Also please help me how to change the size of the profile parameter 'enque/table_size'
    Please reply immeidately.
    Regards,
    Kumar.S

    Dear,
    Lock table overflows means that their are too many locks in the system at that point in time. Check SM12 to see these locks. Is your program causing all these locks or is it something else.
    Please take help from technical person.
    Also refer this link,
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005/helpdata/EN/c2/2d7037ecc92a7ee10000009b38f8cf/frameset.htm
    Regards,
    R.Brahmankar

  • Lock Table Overflow Error in SM58

    Hi Team,
    Error has observed on transactional RFC (SM58),it is happing  every monday during business hours .So we observed that same day db2 automatic reorg job is running same day and same time in SAp PI .Please confirm is this issue with SAPPI or target system ?
    Error Text: “Lock table overflow”
    This issue has fixed after reorg job finished automatically .is there any relation b/w lock table and reorg job ?
    I observed that this was due to DB2 reorg job causing the issue.Please correct me if am wrong ?
    Regards ,
    Ravindar.a

    Hi
    Please check the following link:
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/37/a2e3ba344411d3acb00000e83539c3/frameset.htm
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/d3/43d2416d9c1c7be10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm
    http://sap.ittoolbox.com/groups/technical-functional/sap-basis/lock-table-overflow-506470
    Mutti

  • "Lock table overflow" error msg when trying to change a repot program

    hi ABAP experts,
    We are getting the following error msg
    "Lock table overflow
    Choose 'Display object' or 'Cancel'.".
    Click the question mark on the same error msg window, then the detailed error msg would like this:
    Message no. MC603
    Diagnosis
    This table overflowed when trying to enter SAP locks in the lock table.
    System Response
    The locks could not be set.
    Procedure
    Contact your system administrator. If this error occurs frequently, change the size of the profile parameter 'enque/table_size'. This parameter defines the size of the lock table in KByte.
    What would be the reason and how to resolve this problem?
    <REMOVED BY MODERATOR>
    Edited by: Alvaro Tejada Galindo on Apr 2, 2008 1:03 PM

    Hi,
    This could be bcos the lock table is getting overflowed beyond the allotted space. Check if any other program/BAPI is causing continuous creation of locks.
    To analyze choose (SM12) Extras Statistics to display the statistics. These are the statistics that have been compiled since the last time the lock server was restarted.
    Check the below link for more information on SAP Lock Concept.
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/7b/f9813712f7434be10000009b38f8cf/content.htm
    For details on Subsequent Analysis of Lock Table Overflows, check the below links.
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/d3/43d2416d9c1c7be10000000a1550b0/content.htm
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/f0/b57338788f4d72e10000009b38f8cf/content.htm
    Hope this helps. <REMOVED BY MODERATOR>
    Thanks,
    Balaji
    Edited by: Alvaro Tejada Galindo on Apr 2, 2008 1:03 PM

Maybe you are looking for