Error when sorting foreign key fields in a view

Hello all
I created a view and links to other views, and then created a table. In the table I put different attributes from the view and the views it is linked to. When I click the sort ascending or descending button in a column attribute that is in the original view, everything works fine. However if I click the same arrow button for a different column, one that is in a linked view, I get this error message.
Definition OnlineTerminalId of type Attribute is not found in ObjektiView1.
I do not understand why this does not work. It shows the values inside these linked views just fine. I did change names of some attributes in the database but I had the problem before then, and after I changed them all back so I doubt that is the issue.
If anyone can help I would be much obliged

Dino2dy wrote:
Hmm, what I did is slightly different, but what my way does is give me the ability to create forms that change automatically when I click a row in a table, which I thought would be useful. I could do it your way too but I would have to do everything again from the beginning, which is something I am trying to avoid. There should be a way to fix this problem this way, as it would be kind of stupid to be able to show the data in the table but just not be able to sort or filter by it.You can still accomplish this by relating the combined VO with your children VOs using View Links, same as what you are doing now.
Also that view would be HUGE as it is a single table that is connected to a lot of other tables via foreign keys, so my single view would cover 10 tables.Not necessarily. You don't have to include all Entities in your combined VO - just those that you want their attributes displayed on your table.
Nick

Similar Messages

Error when adding Foreign Key

Hi,
Problem:
When trying to add a Foreign Key via Edit Table | Foreign Key tab an error is thrown
Error:
"ORA-00942: table or view does not exit", Vendor code 942
SQL Developer Generated DDL:
ALTER TABLE "CNArticlesCODES"
DROP CONSTRAINT "CNArticlesCODES_FK1"
ALTER TABLE "CNArticlesCODES"
ADD CONSTRAINT "CNArticlesCODES_FK1" FOREIGN KEY
"ID"
) REFERENCES CNArticlesDATA
"ID"
) ENABLE
My work around:
table name next to REFERENCES command in double quotes
ALTER TABLE "CNArticlesCODES"
ADD CONSTRAINT "CNArticlesCODES_FK1" FOREIGN KEY
"UID"
) REFERENCES "CNArticlesCODES"
"UID"
) ENABLE
SQL Developer 1.0.0.15.57 on Windows XP SP2
Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.10 (Eval Lic) on Windows 2003 Web Edition 32 bit
The 2 tables in this example where generated by MS DTS tool while importing data. This issue is not present when performing the above action on 2 tables generated using SQL Developer.
I'm no database expert and new to Oracle (R&D stage of SQL Server to Oracle migration). So can some body tell me/point me at docs that explains what's going on here with the table names.
Thanks

Hopefully someone from oracle will see this and log it as a bug. If that doesn't happen and you have a support license, you can open up a ticket with them directly.
As an aside.. if you are daring enough, the template for that is stored in one of the jars in an xml file. You can always edit it and add the quotes. Or..and you don't want to hear this.. you may want to rename everything to uppercase. It would hurt now, but could end up saving you time down the road. (adding quotes to every query is a pain)
Eric

00904 error when sorting columns that require double quotes

We have used an ETL tool to import an XML file into Oracle 10g. The column names are mixed case and unfortunately have to remain mixed case because we have a "column" and a "Column" name with different info in them. So when we migrate it in, the field names have be enclosed in double quotes in all SQL operations. The problem in SQL Developer 1.5.1 (Win XP SP2, Oracle 10G) though is that if I try to sort on a column by double clicking the column header, we get an ORA-00904 error COLUMN does not exist. So it looks like it is trying to do an ORDER BY without putting the column name in double quotes. Has anybody else had issues with this and is there a fix for it?
Message was edited by:
coachy

It's a bug.
Logged Bug 7344539 - 00904 error when sorting columns that require double quotes
Workaround: Use the sort button on DataTab's toolbar.
-Raghu

Error when converting a numeric field to XML

Hi,
When i run the Adobe intractive form,i am getting following exception
"Error when converting a numeric field to XML"
Anyone plz suggest
Regards,
vinoth

Hi Vinoth Raja,
For resolving the following exception
"Error when converting a numeric field to XML"
You have to follow the below link:-
http://www.saptechies.com/error-when-converting-numeric-field-xml/
May be it will help you
Regards,
Sushma Yadav

Ora-2270 Error while adding foreign key constraint on top a view

While adding a constraint, referencing a foreign key column from a view raises error. However, it works fine over a table.
Here's the sample script:
create table t_temp (
sample_id number,
text varchar2(40))
alter table t_temp add constraint temp_pk
primary key (sample_id);
create view tempvw as select sample_id,text from t_temp;
create table t_sample (
uniq_id number,
sample_id number,
sample_text varchar(40));
=========
ALTER TABLE t_sample ADD CONSTRAINT FK_sample_temp
     FOREIGN KEY (sample_id) REFERENCES t_temp (sample_id);
This works fine.
=========
==============
The following raises ERROR....
ALTER TABLE t_sample ADD CONSTRAINT FK_sample_temp1
     FOREIGN KEY (sample_id) REFERENCES tempvw (sample_id);
Error starting at line 1 in command:
ALTER TABLE t_sample ADD CONSTRAINT FK_sample_temp1
     FOREIGN KEY (sample_id) REFERENCES tempvw (sample_id)
Error report:
SQL Error: ORA-02270: no matching unique or primary key for this column-list
02270. 00000 - "no matching unique or primary key for this column-list"
*Cause:    A REFERENCES clause in a CREATE/ALTER TABLE statement
gives a column-list for which there is no matching unique or primary
key constraint in the referenced table.
*Action:   Find the correct column names using the ALL_CONS_COLUMNS
catalog view

What exactly are you trying to accomplish by having a
referential integrity constraint on a view (which is
not allowed). PKs and FKs are allowed on views. DISABLE NOVALIDATE is the only allowed state for them. View constraints are used for query rewriting: http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/server.102/b14223/qradv.htm#sthref1457
Regards,
Dima

Dbms_crypto - avoid error when using different key in lower environment

Hello Experts,
We are using Oracle 11.2.0.2. We are planning to implement dbms_crypto to encrypt few columns. We clone the data from production to lower environment ( DEV, QC).
For the lower environments, we do not want to get the sensitive data from production and do not plan to use same key. Rather than getting an error when using differnt key, is it possible to get a different resultset back.
In other words, we want the implementation to be same across environments but want to use a diffent key in lower environment and get different result (or garbage).
Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
While testing this logic, I am getting following error when using differnt key to decrypt. It works fine if I use same key.
Error at line 1
ORA-28817: PL/SQL function returned an error.
ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_CRYPTO_FFI", line 67
ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_CRYPTO", line 44
ORA-06512: at line 19
DECLARE
l_credit_card_no    VARCHAR2(19) := '1234 5678 9012 3456';
l_ccn_raw           RAW(128) := UTL_RAW.cast_to_raw(l_credit_card_no);
l_key               RAW(128) := UTL_RAW.cast_to_raw('abcdefgh');
   l2_key               RAW(128) := UTL_RAW.cast_to_raw('12345678');
l_encrypted_raw     RAW(2048);
l_decrypted_raw     RAW(2048);
BEGIN
DBMS_OUTPUT.put_line('Original : ' || l_credit_card_no);
l_encrypted_raw := DBMS_CRYPTO.encrypt(src => l_ccn_raw,
                                         typ => DBMS_CRYPTO.des_cbc_pkcs5,
                                         key => l_key);
DBMS_OUTPUT.put_line('Encrypted : ' || RAWTOHEX(UTL_RAW.cast_to_raw(l_encrypted_raw)));
l_decrypted_raw := DBMS_CRYPTO.decrypt(src => l_encrypted_raw,
                                         typ => DBMS_CRYPTO.des_cbc_pkcs5,
                                         key => l2_key); --**Using different key to decrypt
DBMS_OUTPUT.put_line('Decrypted : ' || UTL_RAW.cast_to_varchar2(l_decrypted_raw));
END;Thank you.

If I understand what you are trying to do ... and I may not ... it is not going to work.
SQL> DECLARE
2   l_credit_card_no VARCHAR2(19) := '1612-1791-1809-2605';
3   l_ccn_raw RAW(128) := utl_raw.cast_to_raw(l_credit_card_no);
4   l_key1     RAW(128) := utl_raw.cast_to_raw('abcdefgh');
5   l_key2     RAW(128) := utl_raw.cast_to_raw('zyxwvuts'); -- alternate key used to attempt a different decryption
6
7   l_encrypted_raw RAW(2048);
8   l_decrypted_raw RAW(2048);
9 BEGIN
10    dbms_output.put_line('Original : ' || l_credit_card_no);
11
12    l_encrypted_raw := dbms_crypto.encrypt(l_ccn_raw, dbms_crypto.des_cbc_pkcs5, l_key1);
13
14    dbms_output.put_line('Encrypted : ' || RAWTOHEX(utl_raw.cast_to_raw(l_encrypted_raw)));
15
16    l_decrypted_raw := dbms_crypto.decrypt(src => l_encrypted_raw, typ => dbms_crypto.des_cbc_pkc
s5, key => l_key1);
17
18    dbms_output.put_line('Key1 : ' || utl_raw.cast_to_varchar2(l_decrypted_raw));
19
20    l_decrypted_raw := dbms_crypto.decrypt(src => l_encrypted_raw, typ => dbms_crypto.des_cbc_pkc
s5, key => l_key2);
21
22    dbms_output.put_line('Key2 : ' || utl_raw.cast_to_varchar2(l_decrypted_raw));
23 END;
24 /
Original : 1612-1791-1809-2605
Encrypted : 3534443342333642353141363846384237463732384636373943374630364234323243334539383042323135
Key1 : 1612-1791-1809-2605
DECLARE
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-28817: PL/SQL function returned an error.
ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_CRYPTO_FFI", line 67
ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_CRYPTO", line 44
ORA-06512: at line 20

How to avoid shared locks when validating foreign keys?

I have a table with a FK and I want to update a row in that table without being blocked by another transaction which is updating the parent row at the same time. Here is an example:
CREATE TABLE dbo.ParentTable
PARENT_ID int NOT NULL,
VALUE varchar(128) NULL,
CONSTRAINT PK_ParentTable PRIMARY KEY (PARENT_ID)
GO
CREATE TABLE dbo.ChildTable
CHILD_ID int NOT NULL,
PARENT_ID INT NULL,
VALUE varchar(128) NULL,
CONSTRAINT PK_ChildTable PRIMARY KEY (CHILD_ID),
CONSTRAINT FK_ChildTable__ParentTable FOREIGN KEY (PARENT_ID)
REFERENCES dbo.ParentTable (PARENT_ID)
GO
INSERT INTO ParentTable(PARENT_ID, VALUE)
VALUES (1, 'Some value');
INSERT INTO ChildTable(CHILD_ID, PARENT_ID, VALUE)
VALUES (1, 1, 'Some value');
GO
Now I have 2 transactions running at the same time:
The first transaction:
SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL READ UNCOMMITTED;BEGIN TRAN
UPDATE ParentTable
SET VALUE = 'Test'
WHERE PARENT_ID = 1;
The second transaction:
SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL READ UNCOMMITTED;BEGIN TRAN
UPDATE ChildTable
SET VALUE = 'Test',
PARENT_ID = 1
WHERE CHILD_ID = 1;
If 'UPDATE ParentTable' statement runs a bit earlier, then 'UPDATE ChildTable' statement is blocked untill the first transaction is committed or rollbacked. It happens because SQL Server acquires shared locks when validating foreign keys, even
if the transaction is using read uncommitted, read committed snapshot (read committed using row versioning) or snapshot isolation level. I cannot see why change in the ParentTable.VALUE should prevent me from updating ChildTable. Please note that ParentTable.PARENT_ID
is not changed by the first transaction, which means that from FK's point of view whatevere is set to the ParentTable.VALUE is never a problem for referential integrity. So, such blocking behavior seems to me not logical. Furthermore, it contradicts to the
MSDN:
Transactions running at the READ UNCOMMITTED level do not issue shared locks to prevent other transactions from modifying data read by the current transaction. READ UNCOMMITTED transactions are also not blocked by exclusive locks that would prevent the
current transaction from reading rows that have been modified but not committed by other transactions.
Does anybody know how to workaround the issue? In other words, are there any tricks to avoid shared locks when validating foreign keys? (Disabling FK is not an option.) Thank you.
Alexey

If you change the primary key of the parent table to be nonclustered, there is no blocking.
Indeed, when I update ParentTable.VALUE, then:
in case of PK_ParentTable is clustered, a particular row in the clustered index is locked (request_mode:X, resource_type: KEY)
in case of PK_ParentTable is non-clustered, a particular physical row in the heap is locked (request_mode:X, resource_type: RID).
and when I update ChildTable.PARENT_ID, then:
in case of PK_ParentTable is clustered, this index is used to verify referential integrity:
in case of PK_ParentTable is non-clustered, again this index is used to verify referential integrity, but this time it is not locked:
It is important to note that in both cases SQL Server acquires shared locks when validating foreign keys. The principal difference is that in case of clustered PK_ParentTable the request is blocked, while for non-clustered index it is granted.
Thank you, Erland for the idea and explanations.
The only thing that upsets me is that this solution cannot be applied, because I don't want to convert PK_ParentTable from clustered to non-clustered just to avoid blocking issues. It is a pity that SQL Server is not smart enough to realize that:
ParentTable.PARENT_ID is not changed and, as a result, should not be locked
ChildTable.PARENT_ID is not actually changed either (old value in my example is 1 and the new value is also 1) and, as a result, there is no need at all for validating the foreign key.
In fact, the problem I described is just a tip of the iceberg. The real challenge is that I have deadlocks because of the FK validation. In reality, the first transaction has an additional statement which updates ChildTable:
SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL READ UNCOMMITTED;
BEGIN TRAN
UPDATE ParentTable
SET VALUE = 'Test'
WHERE PARENT_ID = 1;
UPDATE ChildTable
SET VALUE = 'Test'
WHERE PARENT_ID = 1;
The result is famous message:
Msg 1205, Level 13, State 51, Line xx
Transaction (Process ID xx) was deadlocked on lock resources with another process and has been chosen as the deadlock victim. Rerun the transaction.
I know that if I change the order of the two statements, it will solve the deadlock issue. But let's imagine I cannot do it. What are the other options?
Alexey

Error when adding a partition to a materlialized view

Hi,
I am getting this error when adding a partition to a materialized view.
ALTER MATERIALIZED VIEW mvedw.MV_CLM_CAPITN_F ADD PARTITION MAR2013 VALUES LESS THAN ('201304')
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-14074: partition bound must collate higher than that of the last partition
Please advise.
Regards,
Narayan

SQL> select TABLE_OWNER,TABLE_NAME,PARTITION_NAME,HIGH_VALUE from dba_tab_partitions where table_name =
'MV_CLM_CAPITN_F' order by PARTITION_NAME 2
3 ;
TABLE_OWNER TABLE_NAME PARTITION_NAME HIGH_VALUE
MVEDW MV_CLM_CAPITN_F APR2009 '200905'
MVEDW MV_CLM_CAPITN_F APR2010 '201005'
MVEDW MV_CLM_CAPITN_F APR2011 '201105'
MVEDW MV_CLM_CAPITN_F APR2012 '201205'
MVEDW MV_CLM_CAPITN_F AUG2009 '200909'
MVEDW MV_CLM_CAPITN_F AUG2010 '201009'
MVEDW MV_CLM_CAPITN_F AUG2011 '201109'
MVEDW MV_CLM_CAPITN_F AUG2012 '201209'
MVEDW MV_CLM_CAPITN_F DEC2008 '200901'
MVEDW MV_CLM_CAPITN_F DEC2009 '201001'
MVEDW MV_CLM_CAPITN_F DEC2010 '201101'
TABLE_OWNER TABLE_NAME PARTITION_NAME HIGH_VALUE
MVEDW MV_CLM_CAPITN_F DEC2012 '201301'
MVEDW MV_CLM_CAPITN_F FEB2009 '200903'
MVEDW MV_CLM_CAPITN_F FEB2010 '201003'
MVEDW MV_CLM_CAPITN_F FEB2011 '201103'
MVEDW MV_CLM_CAPITN_F FEB2012 '201203'
MVEDW MV_CLM_CAPITN_F FEB2013 '201303'
MVEDW MV_CLM_CAPITN_F JAN2009 '200902'
MVEDW MV_CLM_CAPITN_F JAN2010 '201002'
MVEDW MV_CLM_CAPITN_F JAN2011 '201102'
MVEDW MV_CLM_CAPITN_F JAN2012 '201202'
MVEDW MV_CLM_CAPITN_F JAN2013 '201302'
TABLE_OWNER TABLE_NAME PARTITION_NAME HIGH_VALUE
MVEDW MV_CLM_CAPITN_F JUL2009 '200908'
MVEDW MV_CLM_CAPITN_F JUL2010 '201008'
MVEDW MV_CLM_CAPITN_F JUL2011 '201108'
MVEDW MV_CLM_CAPITN_F JUL2012 '201208'
MVEDW MV_CLM_CAPITN_F JUN2009 '200907'
MVEDW MV_CLM_CAPITN_F JUN2010 '201007'
MVEDW MV_CLM_CAPITN_F JUN2011 '201107'
MVEDW MV_CLM_CAPITN_F JUN2012 '201207'
MVEDW MV_CLM_CAPITN_F MAR2009 '200904'
MVEDW MV_CLM_CAPITN_F MAR2010 '201004'
MVEDW MV_CLM_CAPITN_F MAR2011 '201104'
TABLE_OWNER TABLE_NAME PARTITION_NAME HIGH_VALUE
MVEDW MV_CLM_CAPITN_F MAR2012 '201204'
MVEDW MV_CLM_CAPITN_F MAR2013 '201304'
MVEDW MV_CLM_CAPITN_F MAY2009 '200906'
MVEDW MV_CLM_CAPITN_F MAY2010 '201006'
MVEDW MV_CLM_CAPITN_F MAY2011 '201106'
MVEDW MV_CLM_CAPITN_F NOV2009 '200912'
MVEDW MV_CLM_CAPITN_F NOV2010 '201012'
MVEDW MV_CLM_CAPITN_F NOV2012 '201212'
MVEDW MV_CLM_CAPITN_F OCT2009 '200911'
MVEDW MV_CLM_CAPITN_F OCT2010 '201011'
MVEDW MV_CLM_CAPITN_F OCT2011 '201111'
TABLE_OWNER TABLE_NAME PARTITION_NAME HIGH_VALUE
MVEDW MV_CLM_CAPITN_F OCT2012 '201211'
MVEDW MV_CLM_CAPITN_F SEP2009 '200910'
MVEDW MV_CLM_CAPITN_F SEP2010 '201010'
MVEDW MV_CLM_CAPITN_F SEP2011 '201110'
MVEDW MV_CLM_CAPITN_F SEP2012 '201210'
These are the list of partitions available.
Regards,
Narayan

Foreign key fields not getting populated in datacontrol palette for EJB app

Hi,
I am quite new to ADF and EJB.I developed a jdeveloper application with JSF and EJB tiers.(I am using jdeveloper 10.1.3.5)
For database the default HR database is used.I created the entities for the EMPLOYEES and DEPARTMENTS table.
I also created a session bean and a data control for the session bean.
I am having a JSF page that receives all the details of a new Employee and insert into database (i.e persistEntity)
But the Employees constructor from the Data control palette is not populating the MANAGERID and DEPARTMENTID fields which are
the foreign key constraints for the EMPLOYEES table and hence while trying to persist the entity
with the auto populated fields an error message is thrown.
If I used ADF BC instead of EJB then i could populate all the fields including MANAGERID and DEPARTMENTID.
Is it possible to have two text fields for Manager and Department in the jsf to insert the Employee details with EJB as the Model?.
If possible how do I bind the values of these fields to the Employees entity object in EJB.
Kindly need your insights on this.
Thanks,
Guna.

Hi,
How are you using MANAGER_ID and DEPARTMENT_ID fields, are they exposed as Long (or some other numeric type), or did you map them on the entity, something like this
@ManyToOne
private Employee manager; // this by default uses the column named MANAGER_ID
@ManyToOne
private Department department; // this by default uses the column named DEPARTMENT_ID
.... If you mapped them (which is the right way), when you create an employee you should set these attributes before persisting the entity, by using employee.setManager(manager) and employee.setDepartment(department). Then, the foreign keys get populated automatically by your persistence provider (Toplink).
If you are using data controls, it is a little different process to set the department and manager, but you should take a look at this tutorial http://www.oracle.com/technology/obe/obe11jdev/ps1/ejb/ejb.html , it will hopefully answer a lot of your questions.
Pedja

Error when adding forigen key (table or view does not exist)

Hi
i write the foreign key name and select the the table from the combo and also the field and click apply it gives me error message says :-
error table or view does not exist vendor code 942
any help?
thanks in advance.
.

There is only an issue with this if your table has to be enclosed in double quotes. i.e. If you have mixed case table names. In that case, instead of using the context menu (right click on Table) Constraint -> Add Foreign Key, you should use the Edit... table dialog.
We did have a bug logged for this, but the instance for using the Create foreign key dialog has not been fixed. I have reopened the bug.
Sue

Performance degradation when using foreign keys

Hi,
I face drastic performance degradation when I add foreign keys to a table and perform insert / update on that table.
I have a row store table to which I need to insert around 1,50,000 records.
If the table has no foreign key reference it takes maximum of 5 seconds but if the same table has references to other tables (in my case there are 3 references), the processing speed reduces drastically to 2 minutes.
Is there any solution / best practice that can help me in gaining performance (processing speed) in this situation?
Thanks
S.Srivatsan

Hi Sri,
When you perform one insert in any database table which is having foreign key relationships, it will check the corresponding parent tables to check whether the master data is available or not. If your table is having 2 foreign key relationship, it happen twice per insert. Hence the performance will degrade. This is one of the reasons why ECC doesn't establish foreign key relationship in the back end database. The case is not just for INSERT, for UPDATE & DELETE the same is applicable.
Sreehari

Error when add a custom field to source 2LIS_12_VCHDR

Hi Experts,
I'm trying add a custom field to source 2LIS_12_VCHDR. The fields are in LIKP table's append. That are
zz fields. I can see the fields in MCLIKP structure, but I can't see these fields in LBWE transacction when I try update the structure MCLIKP. I don't know if this last is important because when I replicate of the source the fields, they are visible in BW.
The problem is when I try activate the transfer structure. I Can add the fields from the data source to the transfer structure but If try activate the source the error is:
"Error when creating transfer structure /BIC/CCBA2LIS_12_VCHDR in source system XXXX"
I'm forgetting some step?
somebody know other way for do it?
thanks for your help.
Manuel.

Hi
May be the datasource is not active, do the following obviously in development
goto LBWE and click on your datasource; system will ask you for a transport request number give it a name. now save the datasource.
replicate and activate your t/r
hope this helps
Regards

SOAP Error When Referencing Indexed Picklist Fields

You may receive the following error, or something similar, when trying to access the "Indexed Picklist" fields via webservices.
<siebelf:errormsg>Method 'SetFieldValue' of business component 'Opportunity Copy No Sales Process' (integration component 'Opportunity') for record with search specification '[Name] = "Hay man"' returned the following error:"The value entered in field Indexed Pick 1 of buscomp Opportunity Copy No Sales Process does not match any value in the bounded pick list Occam Indexed Custom Opty 1.(SBL-DAT-00225)"(SBL-EAI-04375)</siebelf:errormsg>
This error can be caused by searching for a picklist value that doesn't exist. In many cases, the picklist values are valid, but the developer is accessing the wrong picklist. This is a common mistake because the user interface, and WSDL files are a little different. Indexed Picklist 1 in the user interface is really IndexedPick0 in the WSDL definition file, not IndexedPick1 like many people would think.
Indexed Picklist 1 = IndexedPick0
Indexed Picklist 2 = IndexedPick1
Indexed Picklist 3 = IndexedPick2
Indexed Picklist 4 = IndexedPick3
Indexed Picklist 5 = IndexedPick4
Indexed Picklist 6 = IndexedPick5
Below are the tests I ran when testing this issue, both SOAP requests and responses.
==========================================================================================================================================
The value "Will" is a valid value for the indexed picklist 1 in the admin screen.... I receive the error because I should be looking in IndexedPick0, not IndexedPick1.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?><soap:Envelope xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"><soap:Body>
<OpportunityWS_OpportunityUpdate_Input xmlns="urn:crmondemand/ws/opportunity/10/2004">
<ListOfOpportunity>
<Opportunity>
<OpportunityName>Hay man</OpportunityName>
<IndexedPick1>Will</IndexedPick1>
</Opportunity>
</ListOfOpportunity>
</OpportunityWS_OpportunityUpdate_Input>
</soap:Body>
</soap:Envelope>
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
- <SOAP-ENV:Envelope xmlns:SOAP-ENV="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">
- <SOAP-ENV:Body>
- <SOAP-ENV:Fault>
<faultcode>SOAP-ENV:Server</faultcode>
<faultstring>Method 'SetFieldValue' of business component 'Opportunity Copy No Sales Process' (integration component 'Opportunity') for record with search specification '[Name] = "Hay man"' returned the following error:"The value entered in field Indexed Pick 1 of buscomp Opportunity Copy No Sales Process does not match any value in the bounded pick list Occam Indexed Custom Opty 1.(SBL-DAT-00225)"(SBL-EAI-04375)</faultstring>
- <detail>
- <siebelf:errorstack xmlns:siebelf="http://www.siebel.com/ws/fault">
- <siebelf:error>
<siebelf:errorsymbol />
<siebelf:errormsg>Method 'SetFieldValue' of business component 'Opportunity Copy No Sales Process' (integration component 'Opportunity') for record with search specification '[Name] = "Hay man"' returned the following error:"The value entered in field Indexed Pick 1 of buscomp Opportunity Copy No Sales Process does not match any value in the bounded pick list Occam Indexed Custom Opty 1.(SBL-DAT-00225)"(SBL-EAI-04375)</siebelf:errormsg>
</siebelf:error>
</siebelf:errorstack>
</detail>
</SOAP-ENV:Fault>
</SOAP-ENV:Body>
</SOAP-ENV:Envelope>
==========================================================================================================================================
Correct example and good response.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?><soap:Envelope xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"><soap:Body>
<OpportunityWS_OpportunityUpdate_Input xmlns="urn:crmondemand/ws/opportunity/10/2004">
<ListOfOpportunity>
<Opportunity>
<OpportunityName>Hay man</OpportunityName>
<IndexedPick0>Will</IndexedPick0>
</Opportunity>
</ListOfOpportunity>
</OpportunityWS_OpportunityUpdate_Input>
</soap:Body>
</soap:Envelope>
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
- <SOAP-ENV:Envelope xmlns:SOAP-ENV="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">
- <SOAP-ENV:Body>
- <ns:OpportunityWS_OpportunityUpdate_Output xmlns:ns="urn:crmondemand/ws/opportunity/10/2004">
- <ListOfOpportunity xmlns="urn:/crmondemand/xml/opportunity">
- <Opportunity>
<OpportunityId>1-UVW382</OpportunityId>
<AccountId>1-SILNWP</AccountId>
<CreatedDate>12/07/2006 08:58:52</CreatedDate>
<CreatedBy>Will Braithwaite, 12/07/2006 08:58:52</CreatedBy>
<ExternalSystemId />
<IntegrationId>1-UVW382</IntegrationId>
<ModifiedDate>07/13/2007 09:45:56</ModifiedDate>
<ModifiedById>1-S79WT5</ModifiedById>
<ModifiedBy>Will Braithwaite, 07/13/2007 09:45:56</ModifiedBy>
<CreatedById>1-S79WT5</CreatedById>
</Opportunity>
</ListOfOpportunity>
</ns:OpportunityWS_OpportunityUpdate_Output>
</SOAP-ENV:Body>
</SOAP-ENV:Envelope>

Post Author: ayla1209
CA Forum: Data Connectivity and SQL
I'm having the same error - did you ever get a solution?

Error when Create User Defined Field

Hi all, i got an error when create UDF
Attempted to read or write protected memory. This is often an indication that other memory is corrupt.
Here is part of my code
oUserFieldMD.Name = fieldname
        oUserFieldMD.Description = fielddesc
        oUserFieldMD.Type = fieldtype
        oUserFieldMD.DefaultValue = defaultValue.ToString()
        If fieldtype <> SAPbobsCOM.BoFieldTypes.db_Date Then
            oUserFieldMD.Size = fieldlength
            oUserFieldMD.EditSize = fieldlength
        End If
        If fieldtype = SAPbobsCOM.BoFieldTypes.db_Float Then
            oUserFieldMD.SubType = SAPbobsCOM.BoFldSubTypes.st_Price
        Else
            oUserFieldMD.SubType = SAPbobsCOM.BoFldSubTypes.st_None
        End If
        oUserFieldMD.TableName = tablename
        lRetVal = oUserFieldMD.Add()
        prgbar.Value = prgbar.Value + 1
        If (lRetVal <> 0) Then
            msgs.Add(tablename & " - " & fieldname & " : " & oCompany.GetLastErrorDescription())
        Else
            msgs.Add(tablename & " - " & fieldname & " : successfully created!")
        End If
the error come when reach lRetVal = oUserFieldMD.Add()
what is wrong with my code ?
thanks.

This could be a x64/x86 problem. Try following this thread
[GetCompanyService|GetCompanyService] and recompile your code for the platform you need.

Non key field in Maintainance View

Hi,
I have generated a maintainance view for a Z table. I want to sort data from SM30 by means of a selection screen, for that, in the 'View Flds' tab in the maintainance view, i have entered a 'S' for which ever fields i want to filter the data on.
When i execute the table maintainance, i am able to see only the key fields and not the non-key ones in the selection popup, though i have put a 'S' for both, the key and non-key fields.
Can anyone please let me know how to get the non-key fields on the selection popup when i execute the maintainance view?
Cheers,
Raghav.

Not possible via this functionality. A workaround was suggested by Raymond in this thread:
Transaction code for Table Maitainence for table
Thomas

Error when sorting foreign key fields in a view

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for