Error while doing GR/IR clearing in MR11

Hi friends,
We have a schedule ageeement created in 2004 but got some GR/IR differences and need to do clearing in MR11. I can able to see the purchase order history of it so it conforms that the document is not archived. Only issue is I cannot phisically able to display the material/accounting document because we have recently migrated to different system and therefore the po history was not migrated because of amount of data.
Now the issue is, after inputing the required fields in MR11, we are getting the following error:
System error: Error in routine VERARBEITEN_WERE_DATEN, RE_BPMNG<0 0055004113 0000
Message no. M8 607
I've searched sap notes but couldn't find much help. I've tried different seach criteria but no luck. Could anyone able to help me?
Thanks
Kelly

Hi Vinod Kapote,
Check following IMG Settings in your system;
(a) Schema for Stock transports
(b) Shipping data for Site
Hope you have carried out following activities;
(1) Purchase order with document type UB
(2) Outbound delivery using VL10B
(3) Post Goods Issue using VL02N
(4) Goods Receipt using MIGO
Bye,
Muralidhara

Similar Messages

  • F-04 Section code error while full Down Payment Clearing

    Hi,
    I am facing a situation wherein suppose I have given an advance of INR 10,000 to an employee as Travel advance but due to some reason his trip got cancelled and the employee is refunding me the full advance. I am trying to clear that down payment of INR 10,000 through transaction code F-04 but I am getting an error and the system is asking to input Section code to proceed further but the Section code field is greyed out; I can see only Business Place coming automatically but not Section code. In this case ofcourse no invoice will be raised on the employee.
    I am facing the same problem if try to clear through F-54 without any invoice reference. But when I try to do a partial/residual clearing the system allows me to enter Section code and proceed with the clearing. I have created a validation for making Section code mandatory and am using Sets (t-code GS01) in my validaiton but i have not inputted clearing transaction codes in there.
    What I am unable to understand is why I am getting this error only while doing full clearing and without invoice reference. If there is something wrong with the validation I should get the same error while doing partial/residual clearing.
    Please help me out on this one.
    Thanks

    Hi
    In validation , you have to give TCODs in which both the field required to make mandatory. Otherwise it is applicable for every transaction of vendor.
    Make necessary changes in prequisits in validation.
    Thannks
    GG

  • Error message while doing the Vendor Clearing

    Dear Team,
    I am encountering an issue while doing the Vendor clearing.I am nullifying the Vendor down payment against to RE document through residual posting system is showing the message like the below.
    No additional posting to asset
    Message no. AA 444
    Diagnosis
    A downpayment was already posted to the asset 80567 0 in the currently displayed document. Additional posting to the same asset in this document is not possible for technical reasons.
    Procedure
    Combine the two downpayments into one.
    Please kindly advice.The concern Down payment is showing under open item in FBL1N.Kindly advice how to proceed further.
    Thanks for the consideration.
    Regards,
    Suma.

    Hi Suma,
    First clear Down payment with using of F-54 & next you can clear normal OI.
    Rgds
    SumaMani

  • Error while doing listing

    Hi,
    I am getting error while doing listing. "Manual module selection and checking procedure not possible at present.
    Please advise the resolution and root cause of the error.
    Regards
    prawmu

    i clearly mentioned what was the error occured for me agian ur asking quetion means i can't  tell m . i created an article in mm41 while doing the listing in wsm3 that time this error is occuring if u can solve i will be happy
    thank u
    rk

  • Error while doing outbound delivery against Purchase Order

    hello
    i m getting error while doing Outbound delivery for purchase order as follows
    EKPO-SOBKZ=E; EKPO-UMSOK=_; EKPO-KZBWS<>_ EKPO-KZVBR<>E (Note 305582) not supported (check your entry)
    Message no. M7146, i m not getting wht will be the reason,
    Regards
    NISHJ

    Please go through the note - 305582. It is clearly given the direction.
    Symptom
    You try to post a goods movement for a stock transport order from the unrestricted-use stock into the sales order stock or project stock.
    During the goods issue, the system displays error message M7146 with a text along the lines of "EKPO-SOBKZ=E; EKPO-KZVBR<>E; ... not supported".
    Cause and prerequisites
    In the goods issue for the stock transport order, the system may have to create a stock in transit which is deconstructed during the goods receipt. If the withdrawal takes place from the special stock, it is clear which is the receiving stock.
    However, if the withdrawal is carried out from the unrestricted-use stock ("Collective requirements", controlled by the dependent requirements indicator MARC-SBDKZ in the material master of the issuing plant), this results in the design problem that the control tables of the goods movement do not have any key field for the receiving stock. Therefore, the control for the receiving stock is controlled via the consumption indicator in the account assignment category of the purchase order. The consumption indicator therefore requires a specific default setting (you may have assumed you could change the design of these control tables, however this is not possible).
    Using an inappropriate consumption indicator then causes for the goods issue an incorrect or no stock in transit to be created so that the goods receipt fails.
    Solution
    Implement the program change in accordance with the correction instructions.
    Afterwards implement Note 413908 immediately if this is relevant for your release.

  • Error while doing ABGL Asset Credit Memo

    Hi Friends,
    I am getting the below error while doing Asset Credit Memo in ABGL. Please help me in fix this issue.
    Balance for transaction type group 10 negative for the area 01
    Note:In Asset Explorer Fiscal year start Asset value is 98,425.45 and Change is 4768.19. So total Asset value as of now is 1,03,193.64.
    Now we are trying to do ABGL with 12,790.23 value (Transaction type is 105). System is giving the above highlighted error.
    If we give the amount 4768.19 in ABGL transaction, system is not giving any error. If we give more that that system is giving error.
    Why system is giving error even the asset has balance of 1,03,193.64? Please help me on this..
    Thanks
    Sunil

    Hi,
    If the asset has been capitalized during earlier years, use ABGF to post credit memo.  ABGL is meant for assets capitalized during the year.
    Best Regards,
    Madhu

  • Error while doing "Visulaize Plan"

    Hi,
    Before i did Visualize plan many times without any problem.Now I am getting error while doing so.
    I was able to run "Explain Plan" successfully.
    I am on HANA revision 60.
    I saved above error log and the log information is given below:
    I can identify invalid XML tag <TablesInvolved><![CDATA[raj/AN_VIZ]]></TablesInvolved> but how to fix this issue?
    I gone through various blogs related to Visulaization Plan but not found related to this issue.
    <Plan xmlns="http://www.sap.com/ndb/planviz" ID="ID_0" Type="Estimated">
    <SQL><![CDATA[SELECT KOKRS, BELNR, PERIO, SUM(MEGBTR)
    FROM "_SYS_BIC"."raj/AN_VIZ"
    GROUP BY KOKRS, BELNR, PERIO]]></SQL>
    <CompileTime>
      <Start Unit="us">1401281467643661</Start>
      <End Unit="us">1401281467658329</End>
    </CompileTime>
    <RootRelation ID="ID_0" TypeName="PROJECT" Status="Finished">
      <Name>Project</Name>
      <ExecutionType>Row Search</ExecutionType>
      <Summary><![CDATA[raj/AN_VIZ.KOKRS, raj/AN_VIZ.BELNR, raj/AN_VIZ.PERIO, SUM(raj/AN_VIZ.MEGBTR)]]></Summary>
      <Location>hanasp7:30003</Location>
      <EstimatedCost>
       <Exclusive Unit="us">2.12902e+06</Exclusive>
       <Inclusive Unit="us">2.64021e+06</Inclusive>
      </EstimatedCost>
      <EstimatedOutputCardinality>648284</EstimatedOutputCardinality>
      <Details><![CDATA[{"Projected Cols":"raj/AN_VIZ.KOKRS, raj/AN_VIZ.BELNR, raj/AN_VIZ.PERIO, SUM(raj/AN_VIZ.MEGBTR)","Project column0":"NString(4, 0)  __trex_field_NVarchar3__() ....... [3]:040:<5/7 (16B)>:
      /1/ void*  \"__rids__\" ....... [0]:NOP:<0/1 (8B)>:
      /2/ int32_t(10, 0) const := 0 ....... [1]:LOAD:<3/4 (4B)>:
      /3/ int32_t(10, 0) const := 0 ....... [2]:LOAD:<4/5 (4B)>:","Project column1":"NString(10, 0)  __trex_field_NVarchar3__() ....... [8]:040:<5/7 (16B)>:
      /1/ void*  \"__rids__\" ....... [5]:NOP:<0/1 (8B)>:
      /2/ int32_t(10, 0) const := 0 ....... [6]:LOAD:<3/4 (4B)>:
      /3/ int32_t(10, 0) const := 1 ....... [7]:LOAD:<4/5 (4B)>:","Project column2":"NString(3, 0)  __trex_field_NVarchar3__() ....... [13]:040:<5/7 (16B)>:
      /1/ void*  \"__rids__\" ....... [10]:NOP:<0/1 (8B)>:
      /2/ int32_t(10, 0) const := 0 ....... [11]:LOAD:<3/4 (4B)>:
      /3/ int32_t(10, 0) const := 2 ....... [12]:LOAD:<4/5 (4B)>:","Project column3":"Decimal(18, 3)  __typecast__() ....... [23]:076:<10/12 (16B)>:
      /1/ Fixed16(18, 3)  __trex_field_Fixed16__() ....... [19]:043:<6/8 (16B)>: 
         /1/ void*  \"__rids__\" ....... [15]:NOP:<0/1 (8B)>:
         /2/ int32_t(10, 0) const := 0 ....... [16]:LOAD:<3/4 (4B)>:
         /3/ int32_t(10, 0) const := 3 ....... [17]:LOAD:<4/5 (4B)>:
         /4/ int32_t(10, 0) const := 3 ....... [18]:LOAD:<5/6 (4B)>: 
      /2/ int32_t(10, 0) const := 18 ....... [21]:LOAD:<8/9 (4B)>:
      /3/ int32_t(10, 0) const := 3 ....... [22]:LOAD:<9/10 (4B)>:"}]]></Details>
      <Child ID="ID_8" >
      </Child>
    </RootRelation>
    <Relation ID="ID_8" TypeName="TREX_SEARCH" Status="Finished">
      <Name>Column Search</Name>
      <ExecutionType>Column Search</ExecutionType>
      <Summary><![CDATA[Aggregation on a single table]]></Summary>
      <Location>hanasp7:30003</Location>
      <EstimatedCost>
       <Exclusive Unit="us">511194</Exclusive>
       <Inclusive Unit="us">511194</Inclusive>
      </EstimatedCost>
      <EstimatedOutputCardinality>648284</EstimatedOutputCardinality>
      <TablesInvolved><![CDATA[raj/AN_VIZ]]></TablesInvolved>
      <LogicalPlan ID="ID_11" Type="Estimated">
       <RootRelation ID="ID_11" TypeName="PROJECT" Status="Finished">
        <Name>Project</Name>
        <EstimatedCost>
         <Exclusive Unit="us">0</Exclusive>
         <Inclusive Unit="us">0</Inclusive>
        </EstimatedCost>
        <EstimatedOutputCardinality>648284</EstimatedOutputCardinality>
        <Child ID="ID_12" >
        </Child>
       </RootRelation>
       <Relation ID="ID_12" TypeName="GROUP_BY" Status="Finished">
        <Name>Aggregation</Name>
        <Summary><![CDATA[raj/AN_VIZ.KOKRS, raj/AN_VIZ.BELNR, raj/AN_VIZ.PERIO\nSUM(raj/AN_VIZ.MEGBTR)]]></Summary>
        <EstimatedCost>
         <Exclusive Unit="us">0</Exclusive>
         <Inclusive Unit="us">0</Inclusive>
        </EstimatedCost>
        <EstimatedOutputCardinality>648284</EstimatedOutputCardinality>
        <Details><![CDATA[{"Grouping Cols":"raj/AN_VIZ.KOKRS, raj/AN_VIZ.BELNR, raj/AN_VIZ.PERIO","Aggregation Cols":"SUM(raj/AN_VIZ.MEGBTR)"}]]></Details>
        <Child ID="ID_13" >
        </Child>
       </Relation>
       <Relation ID="ID_13" TypeName="TABLE" Status="Finished">
        <Name>Column View</Name>
        <Schema><![CDATA[_SYS_BIC]]></Schema>
        <ObjectName><![CDATA[raj/AN_VIZ]]></ObjectName>
        <Location>hanasp7:30003</Location>
        <EstimatedCost>
         <Exclusive Unit="us">0</Exclusive>
         <Inclusive Unit="us">0</Inclusive>
        </EstimatedCost>
        <EstimatedOutputCardinality>682404</EstimatedOutputCardinality>
       </Relation>
      </LogicalPlan>
    </Relation>
    </Plan>
    Regards
    Raj

    Hi,
    To solve this you must update your studio. In lower studio versions (PlanViz) does not allow "unknown" XML tags sent by higher version servers. A fix for this issue was made so that PlanViz parser can simply skip unknown tags.
    Please go to version 74, if possible.
    Regards,
    Michael

  • Error while doing EHP4 upgrade in downtime phase

    HI .
    Iam facing the below error while doing the EHP4 upgrade , in downtime phase.
    Checks after phase MAIN_SWITCH/STARTSAP_TRANS were negative!
    Last error code set: RFC call to subst_get_uvers failed with key RFC_ERROR_COMMUNICATION (open): SAP_CMINIT3 : rc=20 >
    Connect to SAP gateway failed Connect_PM GWHOST=Hydhtc4526D, GWSERV=sapgw04, SYSNR=04  LOCATION CPIC (TCP/IP) on local host with Unicode ERROR partner '10.136.162.30:3304' not reached TIME Mon Jun 06 18:17:46 2011 RELEASE 720 COMPONENT NI (network interface) VERSION 40 RC -10 MODULE nixxi.cpp LINE 3286 DETAIL NiPConnect2: 10.136.162.30:3304 SYSTEM CALL connect ERRNO 10061 ERRNO TEXT WSAECONNREFUSED: Connection refused COUNTER System start failed
    Please help me in resolving this error.
    Sanketh.

    Hi,
    Upgrade tool is trying to start the system but system is not coming up. Try to start system manually and see if system comes up or not. If not then check logs in work directory for why system is not coming up.
    Thanks
    Sunny

  • Error while doing  GR for scheduling aggrement

    Dear Experts,
    We are facing error while doing GR for scheduling aggrement.
    we have done the following steps.
    1) Scheduling aggreement in ME31L
    2) Released in ME35L
    3) Mainatined Sch.Agmt Schdule in ME38 for todays and date 200 qty and other line is 800 qty.
    When we are trying to do GR in MIGO system is giving the following message.
    Document 5500000152 does not contain any selectable items
    can I know what I have missed in the above steps.
    Please guide me to resolve this.
    Regards,
    Prasad

    Hi,
    Please check Please check if Gr is already done against this document.  Also please check whether you have attached SA in the source list with line items.
    T-code:ME01
    Enter Mat.code & Plant.
    In the next screen pl.do the following:
    Valid from - commencement date of the SA
    Valid to - End date of the SA
    Vendor - Vendor on whom the SA is released
    POrg - Your purchase organisation
    PPL - Leave it blank(This is only for interplant)
    OUn - Ordering unit
    Agreement - SA number
    Item - 1
    I hope this will resolve your issue. Thanking you

  • Error  While doing ABT1N transaction

    Hi,
    I am facing the below error while doing ABT1N in Asset Accounting.Please help me in fixing this Issue.
    Error Message -No depreciation area for receiving the revenue
    Message no.AAPO149
    Diagnosis
    You tried to post a retirement on asset 1000 100007-0.You entered transaction type 300,in which the retirement with revenue indicator is not set
    You tried to transfer asset 1000 100007-0.According to transfer variant 0001,none of the areas on the asset uses a transaction type for retirement with revenue
    In  both of these cases, you are not allowed to enter revenue or make specifications for the determination of revenue.
    Proceedure
    Check the transfer variant  and check your entry
    please do the needful
    Thanks
    Supriya

    Hello,
    You will have a check box for the same.
    Double click on transaction type, you will see the check box for revenue.
    Otherwise, tomorrow I will get back to you once I am in front of the system.
    Regards,
    Ravi
    Edited by: Ravi Sankar Venna on May 5, 2009 7:53 PM

  • Error while doing F-90 Asset Acquisation

    Hi,
    I am getting the below error while doing F-90 Asset Acquisation scenario. Please help me to fix this issue.
    Tax code V1 country IN does not exist in procedure TAXINN
    Message no. FF713
    Diagnosis
    You entered a tax code which is not defined for the country of the company code to be posted to in the tax calculation procedure.
    System Response
    Procedure
    Check and, if necessary, correct the entry.
    Procedure for System Administration
    If it is not an input error, check and possibly change the system settings.
    To do this, choose Maintain entries (F5).
    Check whether the company code is assigned to the correct country and whether the correct tax calculation procedure has been entered for the company code country.
    Create a new tax code if necessary.
    Caution:
    Since it is possible that the tables in question are being updated at a different time on another computer, it can take a certain amount of time for the tax code to be on all local machines in client server architectures after saving the new code.
    Thanks
    KB

    Hi,
    you need to maintain Tax Code A0 & V0 in t.code OBCL t.code.
    and also ensure to check whether you have created tax code V1 or not in FTXP t.code. If not, create V1 tax code and assign GL on that in the right Transaction event keys in OB40.
    Try.... if not working let me know....
    Regards,
    MOhan.

  • Error while doing AIAB Settlement

    Hi I am facing the below error while doing AIAB during AUC settlement. Please do the needful.
    Data for determination of capitalization not managed in area 01
    Message no. AW507
    Diagnosis
    You have chosen a depreciation area, which does not carry the depreciation data from table COEPBR.
    Procedure
    Choose a different depreciation area.
    Thanks
    KC

    Hi,
    This message could be helpful:
    Error AW507
    Please check the field T082AVIEWB-AUTHORITY. If it is not on 2 this is the reason.
    In this case, you can change the value in T093-VIEW1 using the coding as per SAP note 29706 which you have already discovered. There will be no risk involved in changing this value.
    regards Bernhard

  • Error while doing AUC Settlement in KO88

    Hi
    I am getting the below error while doing KO88. I have maintained the Allocation structure for FXA and given the cost element group in the Source field & Given FXA in Receiver category and selected By cost element option aginast Receiver category FXA in Settlement Cost Element field. I am getting the below error while settling in KO88.
    Define a settlement cost element for receiver type FXA
    Message no. KD506
    Diagnosis
    In allocation structure A1 (controlling area BP01), you did not define which cost element should be used when settling costs/revenues of the sender. Nor did you define receiver type FXA.
    Procedure
    Assign a different allocation structure to the settlement sender (-> Master data -> Settlement rule -> Goto -> Settlement parameters), or maintain allocation structure A1.
    Please help me
    Thanks
    Kishore

    Please check your allocation structure , it looks that settlement cost element that you have assigned in the allocation strcuture is not having correct cost element category.
    regards
    Ranjan

  • Error while doing BAM configuration in JDeveloper

    Hi,
    I tried to create a connection to my local BAM Server in JDev 10.1.3.2.0 and also in 10.1.3.3, but I always failed! Error messages:
    "Server is not set up correctly SOA1"
    I'm running on Windows 2003 and installed BAM according to the Installation Guide (version was Bam with Enterprise Link for windows 10.1.3.3.0).
    I did not get any error while doing the other setups and can access the different BAM tools via the Oracle BAM Start page, but I can't create a connection in JDev. I used the following parameters:
    Host Name: SOA1(system name)
    Port Number: 80
    User Name: Administrator
    Password: <windows domain pwd>
    Domain Name: DOMAINNAME
    Any help would be highly appreciated.
    Regards,
    Shaily

    hi Shaily
    It looks like suggesting a different forum is not needed, because you already tried that ...
    Error while doing BAM connection in jdeveloper
    Error while doing BAM connection in jdeveloper
    Error while doing BAM connection in jdeveloper
    I hope you get some answers.
    success
    Jan Vervecken

  • Error while doing BAM connection in jdeveloper

    Hi,
    I tried to create a connection to my local BAM Server in JDev 10.1.3.2.0 and also in 10.1.3.3, but I always failed! Error messages:
    "Server is not set up correctly SOA1"
    I'm running on Windows 2003 and installed BAM according to the Installation Guide (version was Bam with Enterprise Link for windows 10.1.3.3.0).
    I did not get any error while doing the other setups and can access the different BAM tools via the Oracle BAM Start page, but I can't create a connection in JDev. I used the following parameters:
    Host Name: SOA1(system name)
    Port Number: 80
    User Name: Administrator
    Password: <windows domain pwd>
    Domain Name: DOMAINNAME
    Any help would be highly appreciated.
    Regards,
    Shaily

    *** Duplicate Posting ***Edited by: damorgan on Oct 6, 2008 11:05 PM

Maybe you are looking for

  • CSS problem with content in different browsers?

    I've been revamping the CSS for a website and got most internal pages to display normally on different browsers. However, the site entry page is driving me nuts. I think I've been staring at the code so long that I've overlooked an obvious error. In

  • Confirm Premise takes me to Personalization screen

    Dear Experts, In IC Webclient in the Technical master data I click on the Confirm button and i am taken to the Personalization screen did any one encounter this issue? if yes, could you resolve it? how? we are using CRM 2007 Regards, Raj

  • Data type in SE11

    Hi everyone, a simple question.. In se11 I want to create a structure. But the "data type" zone is gray that I couldn't define types to each component. How could that be? Thanks a lot!

  • Can't find program to burn DVDs

    I used to burn and copy DVDs, XP OS. Now I cannot find the program to do that. Hope I explain myself ok Thank You not too techie minded

  • Raw format to output command to NI 9264

    I need to determine if there is a way to command output to the ni6009 D/A channels in RAW binary format rather than decimal. I have done this for input from the module, see jpg.  The Labview DAQmx read has a RAW option which works for input.  It also