Error while doing Std.cost estimation.

Hallo gurus,
I am facing one problem while doing Std.Cost estimation.
Let me explain in detailed..
I am doing costing estimation for a Product. This product contains both Bought out Material and Customer Supplied Products.But both are coming as Material class as Raw material.
But Overheads to be calculated differently for those means for Bought out product - 1.5% and for Customer supplied Products-5%.
So i have created one Overhead Key and the same is attached to Overhead
Group and this overhead group is attached to a respective material.
In Costing sheet for overhead i have selected Dependency D010 and maintained the same along with Overhead key..
But while executing CK11N, system is not calculating the same.
Pls through some light on this....
Advance Thanks..
Regds,
Janardhan.

Did you attached the costing sheet in costing variant?

Similar Messages

Recursive Loop Error while doing standard cost estimate

SAP Gurus,
We are trying to do standard cost estimate on a material and we are getting error because it is going in recursive loop even though we have used "recursive allowed" indicator for item components in the BOM. The error message numbers are CK 730 and CK 740. We are using 4.6c. I have tried the same scenario in ECC 6.0 and still I get the same problem.
Below is my BOM structure:
Material 10890345 (has low-level code 012)
        ---> 10867220 (has low-level code 013) and has recursive allowed indicator
10867220
        ---> 10846733 (has low-level code 014) and has recursive allowed indicator
10846733
        ---> 10890345 (has low-level code 012) and has recursive allowed indicator
According to me, the BOM for material 10846733 is causing the problem.
For some weird reason while doing the costing run for material 10890345, it s not stopping and going in a loop.10890345 and 10846733 should ideally have the same low-level code as they are recursive.
Please help to provide some solutions at the earliest on how to avoid recursive loop during costing.
Regards,
Swapnil

Dear,
I have 2 things to shear with you.
The method we followed to solve the iteration is as below
1.Config change -
Valuation variant in the costing variant, we changed the sequence as below
material valuation
4 planned price 1
2 std price
3 Mov ave price
2. Material master change
made all the semi finished goods and finished goods
procurement type = E,
costing with qty structure,
Enter the planned price1
By doing this what happens is
when system first start the iteration, takes the planned price 1 and start iterating and next time in the second iteration it takes the calculated price from qty structure till it finds the difference between the value calculated is less than .001. Then it gives the result
Why lot size is important is, in our case in some levels the usage is very less compared to the first material header qty and system used to stop in between and not even reaching the last level as during the cycle it was reaching less .001 difference. may be in your case it may not be the case...just check
Please come back after trying this. this was the only last option i had to solve the issue in my client.
Another alternative is to have a different material for costing purpose to stop the iteration which i will not recommend as we need to do some calculation for each stage and input the cost of dummy material in each stage.
My client is happy with the result as the difference between manual calculation and system calculation is less then .1%...this is because SAP will not consider the difference beyond .001, but in excel you get as many as decimals you want.

Error while doing "Visulaize Plan"

Hi,
Before i did Visualize plan many times without any problem.Now I am getting error while doing so.
I was able to run "Explain Plan" successfully.
I am on HANA revision 60.
I saved above error log and the log information is given below:
I can identify invalid XML tag <TablesInvolved><![CDATA[raj/AN_VIZ]]></TablesInvolved> but how to fix this issue?
I gone through various blogs related to Visulaization Plan but not found related to this issue.
<Plan xmlns="http://www.sap.com/ndb/planviz" ID="ID_0" Type="Estimated">
<SQL><![CDATA[SELECT KOKRS, BELNR, PERIO, SUM(MEGBTR)
FROM "_SYS_BIC"."raj/AN_VIZ"
GROUP BY KOKRS, BELNR, PERIO]]></SQL>
<CompileTime>
<Start Unit="us">1401281467643661</Start>
<End Unit="us">1401281467658329</End>
</CompileTime>
<RootRelation ID="ID_0" TypeName="PROJECT" Status="Finished">
<Name>Project</Name>
<ExecutionType>Row Search</ExecutionType>
<Summary><![CDATA[raj/AN_VIZ.KOKRS, raj/AN_VIZ.BELNR, raj/AN_VIZ.PERIO, SUM(raj/AN_VIZ.MEGBTR)]]></Summary>
<Location>hanasp7:30003</Location>
<EstimatedCost>
   <Exclusive Unit="us">2.12902e+06</Exclusive>
   <Inclusive Unit="us">2.64021e+06</Inclusive>
</EstimatedCost>
<EstimatedOutputCardinality>648284</EstimatedOutputCardinality>
<Details><![CDATA[{"Projected Cols":"raj/AN_VIZ.KOKRS, raj/AN_VIZ.BELNR, raj/AN_VIZ.PERIO, SUM(raj/AN_VIZ.MEGBTR)","Project column0":"NString(4, 0) __trex_field_NVarchar3__() ....... [3]:040:<5/7 (16B)>:
/1/ void* \"__rids__\" ....... [0]:NOP:<0/1 (8B)>:
/2/ int32_t(10, 0) const := 0 ....... [1]:LOAD:<3/4 (4B)>:
/3/ int32_t(10, 0) const := 0 ....... [2]:LOAD:<4/5 (4B)>:","Project column1":"NString(10, 0) __trex_field_NVarchar3__() ....... [8]:040:<5/7 (16B)>:
/1/ void* \"__rids__\" ....... [5]:NOP:<0/1 (8B)>:
/2/ int32_t(10, 0) const := 0 ....... [6]:LOAD:<3/4 (4B)>:
/3/ int32_t(10, 0) const := 1 ....... [7]:LOAD:<4/5 (4B)>:","Project column2":"NString(3, 0) __trex_field_NVarchar3__() ....... [13]:040:<5/7 (16B)>:
/1/ void* \"__rids__\" ....... [10]:NOP:<0/1 (8B)>:
/2/ int32_t(10, 0) const := 0 ....... [11]:LOAD:<3/4 (4B)>:
/3/ int32_t(10, 0) const := 2 ....... [12]:LOAD:<4/5 (4B)>:","Project column3":"Decimal(18, 3) __typecast__() ....... [23]:076:<10/12 (16B)>:
/1/ Fixed16(18, 3) __trex_field_Fixed16__() ....... [19]:043:<6/8 (16B)>:
     /1/ void* \"__rids__\" ....... [15]:NOP:<0/1 (8B)>:
     /2/ int32_t(10, 0) const := 0 ....... [16]:LOAD:<3/4 (4B)>:
     /3/ int32_t(10, 0) const := 3 ....... [17]:LOAD:<4/5 (4B)>:
     /4/ int32_t(10, 0) const := 3 ....... [18]:LOAD:<5/6 (4B)>:
/2/ int32_t(10, 0) const := 18 ....... [21]:LOAD:<8/9 (4B)>:
/3/ int32_t(10, 0) const := 3 ....... [22]:LOAD:<9/10 (4B)>:"}]]></Details>
<Child ID="ID_8" >
</Child>
</RootRelation>
<Relation ID="ID_8" TypeName="TREX_SEARCH" Status="Finished">
<Name>Column Search</Name>
<ExecutionType>Column Search</ExecutionType>
<Summary><![CDATA[Aggregation on a single table]]></Summary>
<Location>hanasp7:30003</Location>
<EstimatedCost>
   <Exclusive Unit="us">511194</Exclusive>
   <Inclusive Unit="us">511194</Inclusive>
</EstimatedCost>
<EstimatedOutputCardinality>648284</EstimatedOutputCardinality>
<TablesInvolved><![CDATA[raj/AN_VIZ]]></TablesInvolved>
<LogicalPlan ID="ID_11" Type="Estimated">
   <RootRelation ID="ID_11" TypeName="PROJECT" Status="Finished">
    <Name>Project</Name>
    <EstimatedCost>
     <Exclusive Unit="us">0</Exclusive>
     <Inclusive Unit="us">0</Inclusive>
    </EstimatedCost>
    <EstimatedOutputCardinality>648284</EstimatedOutputCardinality>
    <Child ID="ID_12" >
    </Child>
   </RootRelation>
   <Relation ID="ID_12" TypeName="GROUP_BY" Status="Finished">
    <Name>Aggregation</Name>
    <Summary><![CDATA[raj/AN_VIZ.KOKRS, raj/AN_VIZ.BELNR, raj/AN_VIZ.PERIO\nSUM(raj/AN_VIZ.MEGBTR)]]></Summary>
    <EstimatedCost>
     <Exclusive Unit="us">0</Exclusive>
     <Inclusive Unit="us">0</Inclusive>
    </EstimatedCost>
    <EstimatedOutputCardinality>648284</EstimatedOutputCardinality>
    <Details><![CDATA[{"Grouping Cols":"raj/AN_VIZ.KOKRS, raj/AN_VIZ.BELNR, raj/AN_VIZ.PERIO","Aggregation Cols":"SUM(raj/AN_VIZ.MEGBTR)"}]]></Details>
    <Child ID="ID_13" >
    </Child>
   </Relation>
   <Relation ID="ID_13" TypeName="TABLE" Status="Finished">
    <Name>Column View</Name>
    <Schema><![CDATA[_SYS_BIC]]></Schema>
    <ObjectName><![CDATA[raj/AN_VIZ]]></ObjectName>
    <Location>hanasp7:30003</Location>
    <EstimatedCost>
     <Exclusive Unit="us">0</Exclusive>
     <Inclusive Unit="us">0</Inclusive>
    </EstimatedCost>
    <EstimatedOutputCardinality>682404</EstimatedOutputCardinality>
   </Relation>
</LogicalPlan>
</Relation>
</Plan>
Regards
Raj

Hi,
To solve this you must update your studio. In lower studio versions (PlanViz) does not allow "unknown" XML tags sent by higher version servers. A fix for this issue was made so that PlanViz parser can simply skip unknown tags.
Please go to version 74, if possible.
Regards,
Michael

Error while doing AUC Settlement in KO88

Hi
I am getting the below error while doing KO88. I have maintained the Allocation structure for FXA and given the cost element group in the Source field & Given FXA in Receiver category and selected By cost element option aginast Receiver category FXA in Settlement Cost Element field. I am getting the below error while settling in KO88.
Define a settlement cost element for receiver type FXA
Message no. KD506
Diagnosis
In allocation structure A1 (controlling area BP01), you did not define which cost element should be used when settling costs/revenues of the sender. Nor did you define receiver type FXA.
Procedure
Assign a different allocation structure to the settlement sender (-> Master data -> Settlement rule -> Goto -> Settlement parameters), or maintain allocation structure A1.
Please help me
Thanks
Kishore

Please check your allocation structure , it looks that settlement cost element that you have assigned in the allocation strcuture is not having correct cost element category.
regards
Ranjan

Error while doing settlement from WBS to P&L Account

Hello
I am trying to do a settlement from WBS to P&L Account(Expense account). In this case, "Dummy" Prof Ctr is getting derived from 0KE5 (we have maintained a dummy prof ctr). We have set the validations to disallow any postings/settlements to dummy prof ctr. Hence I am getting an error while doing settlement.
Now I am maintaning a Prof ctr in my WBS master data. I am unable to understand why system is deriving dummy prof ctr and not the one maintained on WBS master data. The settlements are working fine when I do them against Balance sheet accounts and proper prof ctr is getting derived, which is being maintained on WBS master data. I am getting trouble only while doing settlement to my P&lL i.e. expense accounts.
can anyone throw some light on this?
Thks
Sarang

Dear Sarang,
You have maintained profit center in WBS master which is not updated at the time settlement to FI that what makes you worried. If you are making FI posting and give WBS as an additional account assignment then Profit center in WBS master will be updated. Here in settlement WBS is sender not the receiver so that profit center will not be updated. In settlement receiver (any) is debited and sender (WBS) is credited so this credit entry will be updated in profit center.
To your second query that when you carry out settlement to balance sheet account right profit center is updated then please make sure, that balance sheet account is maintained in 3KEH with profit center or OKB9.
Your P&L account (expense) receives dummy profit center because it is not able to find cost center which can fetch profit center from the master. So, if you can afford, maintain that cost elements (expense account) with profit center in OKB9.
might help you..........................................................

Error while doing Goods receipt for process order. Error code: "BS027"

I am getting error while doing GR for a day whereas previous day(s) GR is already done and also 2 days post that day are also done successfully.
Error : ""Goods receipt for prodn. order" is not allowed (ORD XX-CEMTSAL) " (XX = First two characters of plant code)
Error code: BS027.
Thanks to all in advance.

Hello,
This issue would occur when you want to post a confirmation for a production order. The error message is generated if you wanted to post a backflush for a component and if this component was assigned to a sales order stock. The sales order itself was assigned to a work breakdown structure element which should be debited with the actual costs. However, the business transaction 'Confirm' is not permitted for a work breakdown structure.
Please look into SAP Note 62367 and 64370
Hope the information is helpful
regards

I am getting error while doing MFBF for semifinisg good

Hi,
i am getting error while doing MFBF for semifinisg good
Existing standard cost estimate cannot be used
Message no. RM175
Diagnosis
This error appears under the following circumstances:
The existing standard cost estimate cannot be used for backflushing activities as the repetitive manufacturing profile was not maintained correctly when the standard cost estimate was carried out.
The standard cost estimate must come from product costing. Other cost estimates (such as base object controlling) are not possible.
Procedure
The repetitive manufacturing profile assigned to the material at the time of the planned cost estimate must be a profile for repetitive manufacturing with product cost collector.
Use product costing to create the standard cost estimate.

I had already check REM profile repetitive mfg profile final backflush w. activities.
this particular material is semifinish material attached in BOM of finish material.
backflush of finish good is possible but now new requirement is to do production booking for the semifinish material.
i had assign production version , done routing and maintain REM profile,
created material cost with quantity structure ck11n then run the costing in ck40n.
still getting the error what else is to done to able to book this thru MFBF.

Error while doing ABGL Asset Credit Memo

Hi Friends,
I am getting the below error while doing Asset Credit Memo in ABGL. Please help me in fix this issue.
Balance for transaction type group 10 negative for the area 01
Note:In Asset Explorer Fiscal year start Asset value is 98,425.45 and Change is 4768.19. So total Asset value as of now is 1,03,193.64.
Now we are trying to do ABGL with 12,790.23 value (Transaction type is 105). System is giving the above highlighted error.
If we give the amount 4768.19 in ABGL transaction, system is not giving any error. If we give more that that system is giving error.
Why system is giving error even the asset has balance of 1,03,193.64? Please help me on this..
Thanks
Sunil

Hi,
If the asset has been capitalized during earlier years, use ABGF to post credit memo. ABGL is meant for assets capitalized during the year.
Best Regards,
Madhu

Error while doing EHP4 upgrade in downtime phase

HI .
Iam facing the below error while doing the EHP4 upgrade , in downtime phase.
Checks after phase MAIN_SWITCH/STARTSAP_TRANS were negative!
Last error code set: RFC call to subst_get_uvers failed with key RFC_ERROR_COMMUNICATION (open): SAP_CMINIT3 : rc=20 >
Connect to SAP gateway failed Connect_PM GWHOST=Hydhtc4526D, GWSERV=sapgw04, SYSNR=04 LOCATION CPIC (TCP/IP) on local host with Unicode ERROR partner '10.136.162.30:3304' not reached TIME Mon Jun 06 18:17:46 2011 RELEASE 720 COMPONENT NI (network interface) VERSION 40 RC -10 MODULE nixxi.cpp LINE 3286 DETAIL NiPConnect2: 10.136.162.30:3304 SYSTEM CALL connect ERRNO 10061 ERRNO TEXT WSAECONNREFUSED: Connection refused COUNTER System start failed
Please help me in resolving this error.
Sanketh.

Hi,
Upgrade tool is trying to start the system but system is not coming up. Try to start system manually and see if system comes up or not. If not then check logs in work directory for why system is not coming up.
Thanks
Sunny

Error while doing GR for scheduling aggrement

Dear Experts,
We are facing error while doing GR for scheduling aggrement.
we have done the following steps.
1) Scheduling aggreement in ME31L
2) Released in ME35L
3) Mainatined Sch.Agmt Schdule in ME38 for todays and date 200 qty and other line is 800 qty.
When we are trying to do GR in MIGO system is giving the following message.
Document 5500000152 does not contain any selectable items
can I know what I have missed in the above steps.
Please guide me to resolve this.
Regards,
Prasad

Hi,
Please check Please check if Gr is already done against this document. Also please check whether you have attached SA in the source list with line items.
T-code:ME01
Enter Mat.code & Plant.
In the next screen pl.do the following:
Valid from - commencement date of the SA
Valid to - End date of the SA
Vendor - Vendor on whom the SA is released
POrg - Your purchase organisation
PPL - Leave it blank(This is only for interplant)
OUn - Ordering unit
Agreement - SA number
Item - 1
I hope this will resolve your issue. Thanking you

Error While doing ABT1N transaction

Hi,
I am facing the below error while doing ABT1N in Asset Accounting.Please help me in fixing this Issue.
Error Message -No depreciation area for receiving the revenue
Message no.AAPO149
Diagnosis
You tried to post a retirement on asset 1000 100007-0.You entered transaction type 300,in which the retirement with revenue indicator is not set
You tried to transfer asset 1000 100007-0.According to transfer variant 0001,none of the areas on the asset uses a transaction type for retirement with revenue
In both of these cases, you are not allowed to enter revenue or make specifications for the determination of revenue.
Proceedure
Check the transfer variant and check your entry
please do the needful
Thanks
Supriya

Hello,
You will have a check box for the same.
Double click on transaction type, you will see the check box for revenue.
Otherwise, tomorrow I will get back to you once I am in front of the system.
Regards,
Ravi
Edited by: Ravi Sankar Venna on May 5, 2009 7:53 PM

Error while doing F-90 Asset Acquisation

Hi,
I am getting the below error while doing F-90 Asset Acquisation scenario. Please help me to fix this issue.
Tax code V1 country IN does not exist in procedure TAXINN
Message no. FF713
Diagnosis
You entered a tax code which is not defined for the country of the company code to be posted to in the tax calculation procedure.
System Response
Procedure
Check and, if necessary, correct the entry.
Procedure for System Administration
If it is not an input error, check and possibly change the system settings.
To do this, choose Maintain entries (F5).
Check whether the company code is assigned to the correct country and whether the correct tax calculation procedure has been entered for the company code country.
Create a new tax code if necessary.
Caution:
Since it is possible that the tables in question are being updated at a different time on another computer, it can take a certain amount of time for the tax code to be on all local machines in client server architectures after saving the new code.
Thanks
KB

Hi,
you need to maintain Tax Code A0 & V0 in t.code OBCL t.code.
and also ensure to check whether you have created tax code V1 or not in FTXP t.code. If not, create V1 tax code and assign GL on that in the right Transaction event keys in OB40.
Try.... if not working let me know....
Regards,
MOhan.

Error while doing AIAB Settlement

Hi I am facing the below error while doing AIAB during AUC settlement. Please do the needful.
Data for determination of capitalization not managed in area 01
Message no. AW507
Diagnosis
You have chosen a depreciation area, which does not carry the depreciation data from table COEPBR.
Procedure
Choose a different depreciation area.
Thanks
KC

Hi,
This message could be helpful:
Error AW507
Please check the field T082AVIEWB-AUTHORITY. If it is not on 2 this is the reason.
In this case, you can change the value in T093-VIEW1 using the coding as per SAP note 29706 which you have already discovered. There will be no risk involved in changing this value.
regards Bernhard

Error while doing BAM configuration in JDeveloper

Hi,
I tried to create a connection to my local BAM Server in JDev 10.1.3.2.0 and also in 10.1.3.3, but I always failed! Error messages:
"Server is not set up correctly SOA1"
I'm running on Windows 2003 and installed BAM according to the Installation Guide (version was Bam with Enterprise Link for windows 10.1.3.3.0).
I did not get any error while doing the other setups and can access the different BAM tools via the Oracle BAM Start page, but I can't create a connection in JDev. I used the following parameters:
Host Name: SOA1(system name)
Port Number: 80
User Name: Administrator
Password: <windows domain pwd>
Domain Name: DOMAINNAME
Any help would be highly appreciated.
Regards,
Shaily

hi Shaily
It looks like suggesting a different forum is not needed, because you already tried that ...
Error while doing BAM connection in jdeveloper
Error while doing BAM connection in jdeveloper
Error while doing BAM connection in jdeveloper
I hope you get some answers.
success
Jan Vervecken

Error while doing BAM connection in jdeveloper

Hi,
I tried to create a connection to my local BAM Server in JDev 10.1.3.2.0 and also in 10.1.3.3, but I always failed! Error messages:
"Server is not set up correctly SOA1"
I'm running on Windows 2003 and installed BAM according to the Installation Guide (version was Bam with Enterprise Link for windows 10.1.3.3.0).
I did not get any error while doing the other setups and can access the different BAM tools via the Oracle BAM Start page, but I can't create a connection in JDev. I used the following parameters:
Host Name: SOA1(system name)
Port Number: 80
User Name: Administrator
Password: <windows domain pwd>
Domain Name: DOMAINNAME
Any help would be highly appreciated.
Regards,
Shaily

*** Duplicate Posting ***Edited by: damorgan on Oct 6, 2008 11:05 PM

Error while doing Std.cost estimation.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for