Error while Stock Posting

Hi All
While posting the stock in the plant, I am getting the Error message that " Period 004/2007 is not open for account type S and G/L 399999.
In the diagnosis message is coming that Period 044 of the fiscal 2007 does not exist in table T 001 B either in period 1 or in period 2 of the table entry with the record type " 0", the selected company code, the account type S and the G/L account 399999. The period is therefore not open.
I have already closed the Fiscal period till 004 2007.
Could anyone help on this.
Regards
Vipin

Hi Steve,
Since I am doing this for my practice purpose so I am seeking help from the experts here.
I have gone to the T.Code screen OB52, there we have Account type +,A,D,K, S with each having their own period ranges. I had done the changes in the S type of the account to the correct period and my problem is still there. the changes i did are mentioned below. My question is is it required to change the posting period for rest of the account types as well.
And in the column To Period Indicates "16". Does this 16 indicates the special period for postng i.e 12 + 4 or what?. I am just writing the entries in the table for the reference,
Vart   Account Type    "From Account" "To Account"    "From Per1"   "Year"     "To Period" "Year"   "From Per 2"    "Year"    "To Period"     "Year"    "AUGR."
0001               S            -
                      ZZZZ                  1            2001     12            2004      13   2001        16    2007
And whats the meaning of period 1 and period 2..
Pls provide the answers to these questions. Thank you

Similar Messages

Error while stock posting through template

Hi
im using stock taking tamplate for posting stock.after importing dtw shows no error, but when i observe the stock then the stock is not inserted.Whats the reason?how to solve it?
Thanks

Hi Krishna,
Actually when you import the data thru the oStock taking, then the data features in the
Inventory> Inventory Transactions> Initial Quantities......
in the Inventory Tracking tab page wih the counted check box ticked.
Then you update that and then open the same thru the stock posting tab and post by clicking on reconcile.
Now as a prior activity you should have the price list imported in the system. Before you update the counted quantities in inventory tracking, go to the initial quantities tab page and select the price list. The system will then take this price as the item cost to post in the inventory.
As a an activity to proceed, generally I would suggest that you take the item cost from the client, make a price list name "Item cost" and then import the price values for all the items.
Then you start the quantity import. So this price list is only for the stock posting purpose.
so to put in in a step wise schedule
1. Import price list and price values
2. go to Inventory> Inventory Transactions> Initial Quantities......
3. Initial quantities tab> and select the required price list for inventory posting
4. Import thru DTW (oStocktaking)
5. go to Inventory> Inventory Transactions> Initial Quantities......
inventory tracking tab> update
6. Inventory> Inventory Transactions> Initial Quantities......
stock posting tab> Reconcile
Then there will be a posting in the inventory gain which is an ofset entry for the import of opening balance. The same way you create an offset account during the update of BP opening balance. You may change the name to Opening balance offset and map that account during the time you reconcile the stock posting.
I hope this answers your query.
Regards,
Raj.

ERROR IN STOCK POSTING

while doing stock posting I am getting the bellow error T.code:MB1C
(Period 004/2014 is not open for account type S and G/L 799999)
Discussion locked.
Reason:
1. Basic question. Please put some effort in search & trail, before you post your query as discussion and explain your effort & understanding on that. Don't treat SCN as training center or help center.
2. Don't post all CAP in subject title
Please review SCN Rule of Engagement(RoE) and adhere them in your future post/conduct in SCN.
Message was edited by: Jyoti Prakash

MATERIAL 419 DOES NOT EXIST IN WAREHOUSE AP " this error is generated when you make a transfer posting from material to material in inventory management and simultaneously change the plant.
Solution: Maintain the Material master record of the material in the current plant only. Please also check the warehouse assigned to the plant and whether it has multiple assignments.
award points if helpful

QM error while GR posting-urgent

hi all,
We are getting Quality related error while posting GR.
ERRor message is :<b>Change the inspection stock of material in QM only</b>.
Have faced this problem ever before?
regards,
Shyam

hi mona,
i think the material with which u r trying to do the gr has QM view uptodated i material master.
if that is the case then u cannot directly place the material in unrestricted use.
u have to go through the user decision and then place the material in the respective stock.
regards,
indranil

Error while running post clone on DB tier

Hi,
While running post clone on DB tier (12.1.1 version), I am getting the following error
Creating the control file for faat1212_jsrc-cn4 database ...
SQL*Plus: Release 11.1.0.7.0 - Production on Mon Mar 8 18:24:10 2010
Copyright (c) 1982, 2008, Oracle. All rights reserved.
ERROR:
ORA-01031: insufficient privileges
ORA-01031: insufficient privileges
ERROR:
ORA-01031: insufficient privileges
ORA-01031: insufficient privileges
SP2-0640: Not connected
SP2-0640: Not connected
SP2-0640: Not connected
SP2-0640: Not connected
SP2-0640: Not connected
ORA-01012: not logged on
ERROR:
ORA-01031: insufficient privileges
ORA-01031: insufficient privileges
SP2-0640: Not connected
SP2-0641: "EXECUTE" requires connection to server
ORA-01031: insufficient privileges
ERROR:
ORA-01031: insufficient privileges
Checking for errors ...
The database has not been successfully created. Shutting down the instance ...
SQL*Plus: Release 11.1.0.7.0 - Production on Mon Mar 8 18:24:11 2010
Copyright (c) 1982, 2008, Oracle. All rights reserved.
ERROR:
ORA-01031: insufficient privileges
.end std out.
.end err out.
I am running the script only as oracle user and I also checked in the context file for the "dbuser", it also shows oracle user.
Please help
Thanks
Sasi

Hi,
I copied the ORACLE_HOME again and ran the post clone on DB tier again. This time I am getting the following error
Total System Global Area 1071333376 bytes
Fixed Size                  1318172 bytes
Variable Size             427819748 bytes
Database Buffers          629145600 bytes
Redo Buffers               13049856 bytes
Control file created.
alter database open resetlogs
*+
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-01092: ORACLE instance terminated. Disconnection forced
Process ID: 6001
Session ID: 400 Serial number: 3
ERROR:
ORA-03114: not connected to ORACLE
ORA-24324: service handle not initialized
ORA-01041: internal error. hostdef extension doesn't exist
Checking for errors ...
The database has not been successfully created. Shutting down the instance ...
SQL*Plus: Release 11.1.0.7.0 - Production on Tue Mar 9 02:20:04 2010
Copyright (c) 1982, 2008, Oracle. All rights reserved.
Connected.
ORA-24324: service handle not initialized
ORA-01041: internal error. hostdef extension doesn't exist
Disconnected from ORACLE
These are the last few lines in the alert log
+ORA-07445: exception encountered: core dump [PC:0x3D7E4214] [SIGSEGV] [ADDR:0xF718BE] [PC:0x3D7E4214] [Address not mapped to object] []+
Incident details in: /u02/app/oracle17/tech_st/11.1.0/admin/faat1212_jsrc-cn4/diag/rdbms/faat1212/faat1212/incident/incdir_2530/faat1212_ora_6247_i2530.trc
+Exception [type: SIGSEGV, Address not mapped to object] [ADDR:0xB6F6A224] [PC:0x94EA856, {empty}]+
Errors in file /u02/app/oracle17/tech_st/11.1.0/admin/faat1212_jsrc-cn4/diag/rdbms/faat1212/faat1212/trace/faat1212_ora_6247.trc (incident=2531):
+ORA-07445: exception encountered: core dump [PC:0x94EA856] [SIGSEGV] [ADDR:0xB6F6A224] [PC:0x94EA856] [Address not mapped to object] []+
+ORA-07445: exception encountered: core dump [PC:0x3D7E4214] [SIGSEGV] [ADDR:0xF718BE] [PC:0x3D7E4214] [Address not mapped to object] []+
Incident details in: /u02/app/oracle17/tech_st/11.1.0/admin/faat1212_jsrc-cn4/diag/rdbms/faat1212/faat1212/incident/incdir_2531/faat1212_ora_6247_i2531.trc
+Exception [type: SIGSEGV, Address not mapped to object] [ADDR:0x1] [PC:0xAF3B863, {empty}]+
Tue Mar 09 03:20:08 2010
Sweep Incident[2546]: completed
Sweep Incident[2545]: completed
Sweep Incident[2538]: completed
Sweep Incident[2537]: completed
Please help..Thanks a lot in advance
Regards
Sasi

Error while MIRO posting: Unique co code has not been assigned to co number

Hi all
I am getting the following error while posting MIRO-
"A unique co code has not been assigned to co no". I think this might have to do something with CO no range. Is it so. Does any1 have any idea what this could be because of?
Thxs in advance
Hrishi

Hi Vishnu
Thxs for ur immediate reply. But cross co conttrolling is not active in my case. The error diagnosis reads as follows-
Doc breakdown is active in ur system. In certain cases, a co code is derieved frm the Co ID no and this must lead to the assignment of a unique co code.
A unique co code could not be assigned to Co no.
Message No GLT0001

Error while doing post good receipt

Hi Frnd,
I am doing Returns delivery VL02n while doing Post goods receipt i am getting an error saying that
*Document is incomplete: You cannot post goods movement*
The batches are not defined for delivery item 900001
What is this error ?
Regards
Rakesh

Hi Rakesh,
Go to IMG... logistic general ... batch management ... batch determination and batch check ... batch search procedure and check the activationu2026 Activate Automatic Batch Determination in SD
Activate Automatic Batch Determination for Delivery Item Categories
I think you have not checked the Auto batch determination for your delivery item categories.
Please check and then try.
Hope it helps,
Regards,
MT

AFS-QM Error in stock posting performed by taking Usage decision

Hi all,
during stock posting with 105 mov type performed by taking Usage Decision (QA11), I faced with a strange system behavior, described beneath.
Previuos steps:
Purchase order creation
Partial Good receipt performed by MIGO, mov type 103 (Blocked stock from PO)
Automatic Creation of Inspection Lot
Error encountered:
If I take usage decision (QA11) for the inspection lot created, putting the stock checked in Unrestricted Use (correspondant mov type = 105), in the following good receipt (related to the same purchase order), the incoming stock available is less of the real quantity, previously accepted..
After some checks we understood that with 105 mov type the system doubles the real quantity previoulsy accepted, acting in the following manner:
Initial PO: 100 PZ
1° Good receipt: 30 PZ
(automatic creation of inspection lot)
If we take a usage decision, posting stock to unrestricted use (mov type 105), in the 2° Good receipt, the quantity available from the same PO is not 70 PZ (100 - 30), but only 40 PZ ! ! (100 - (30 * 2)) = 40
Please note that it does not occur if we post stock (always 105 mov type) with a MIGO transaction, so we are forced to think that the problem is strictly related to AFS-QM inventory posting, and not to 105 mov type or inbounding process.
Thanks for your collaboration,
Regards,
Ale

I'm not familiar with the specific apparel and footwear solution but with regards to QM, if you are using the standard SAP delivered stock postings, it should use 105 to accept the material to unrestricted for the GR blocked.
I would first use MB51 for the material and batch and review all the material movement documents. Look at the trail of movements and try to see where the changes happen.
In your example, what did the unrestricted inventory and GR blocked inventory show as stock levels?
I'd also check OSS for issues related to AFS/QM. This is not new functionality in SAP so I would be surprised if this was an actual bug or problem in the system that hasn't been seen before.
FF

Error in stock posting and valuation

Hi
While taking stock in initial qty tab of inventory transaction im considering two ledgers one at the top im taking one opening account(open inventory account)and one is in front of item is ledger belonging group of that item (inventory account), avg value of item.there are no of items with different inventory accounts.on adding what the system does is
1.just debiting and crediting the inventory account.ie the inventory account is balanced(shows nill).
2.shows the qty stored in the (-ve ) sign in stock posting tab, which on reconsilling crediting the inventory account and debiting stock diffrence losses account.
the thing i want is that my inventory account should be debit and opening balance should be credit.
how should i do this?i have no clue.please solve it.
Thanks in advance

Hi,
The system will pick the inventory account from the item master data which you have assigned. Example - if you have set your item GL account on Item Group then system will hit the Inventory Account from the respective Item group. This is irrespective of the valuation method.
Hope this will help you.
Regards,
Abhishek
Edited by: Abhishek A on Dec 23, 2008 11:53 AM

Error in stock posting in UD

hiii,
Error in Record Usage Decision (inspection lot stock tab)showing
"stock posting for inspection lot not possible"
lot is in released status
thanks
Edited by: aks on Jan 2, 2009 1:36 AM

For you to be able to post the stock the status of the lot should be SPRQ ( Quantity posting required ), only then would you be able to post the lot to URS and the lot status would change to SPCO ( Stock posting completed ).
For a complete sequence of lot status refer below:
UD Usage decision has been made
PASG Plan/specification assigned
CCTD Insp. characteristics created
CALC Sample calculated
RREC Results confirmed
ICST Short-term insp. completed
ICCO Inspection close completed
SPRQ Quantity posting required
SPCO Stock posting completed
STUP Statistics updated

Error in stock posting : 005/2007 period not close in GL 799999 for type S

Dear All,
While posting stock through MB1C following error is shown. Though in T-Code MMRV is shows the period is closing. And also we tryed OBBP and created variant for our company code for all the line copying from 1000.
Please help in this regards,
Thanks in Advance.
CG Balaji

Hi,
This is an FI error, but you can go to OB52 and then in the second colum of the period change it to 2007 for type S.
Thanks
Priyanka M.

Error in Stock Posting (mb1c)

Hi!
Guru's,
While posting the stock in T-code MB1C i have this error- "Document number Z100(this is my CCode) 1 2007 was already assigned.
I checked in FBN1 (T-code).
Plz solve this error.
Thanks with Regards,
nrk.

Hi,
Can you check material document number range and check the number range, might be clash with other fiscal year.I mean the same number range exist in other year.
Regards,
Chandra

Error while Sales posting in ISR , Inbound WPUUMS

Hi,
While posting the sales in ISR , through inbound IDOC im getting a error : Pipeline/consignment movement posted without value for a article.
Although the Purchase info record is correctly maintained.
Pls let me know what could be the possible reasons for this error & how to resolve it?
Regards,
Priyanka.

The system has determined a consignment/pipeline price of 0.00.
Possible reasons:
The system could not find any valid condition for the posting date in the consignment/pipeline info record.
A price of 0.00 was defined in the info record.
check whether the conditions or the price has been defined correctly in the info record, if necessary. If there is a condition with a price other than zero, check whether the posting date of the movement lies within the condition's validity period.

FM error while saving posting for FB60

Dear all,
i have implemented FM in ecc 6 ver ,while doing FB60 i got the below error.
FM account assignment SPML/DUMMY cannot be posted in posting ledger 9A
Message no. FMBS123
Diagnosis
The budget structure settings do not allow posting to the FM account assignment SPML/DUMMY. The check of the budget structure ended with the return code 4.
The system recognizes the following return codes for the check of posting addresses:
u2022     Return code 1:
The check of posting addresses is switched on. However the FM account assignment SPML/DUMMY is missing in the budget structure. Insert this account assignment in the budget structure for the posting ledger 9A.
u2022     Return code 2:
The check of posting addresses is switched off, but the validation of posting addresses does not allow posting on this address. Check the implementation of the Business Add-In (BAdI) Validate Budget and Posting Addresses in BS.
u2022     Return code 3:
The FM account assignment SPML/DUMMY leads to a conflict when you define a grouping key within the context of the budget structure. Check the implementation of the Business Add-In (BAdI) Define Grouping Key.
u2022     Return code 4:
The derivation strategy used for deriving the budget address from the posting address derives an invalid budget address. You can use the program for displaying of budget structure settings to find out which derivation strategy is used. Check the Derivation Strategy for BudgetAddresses in Customizing. This error may also be caused by inconsistent customizing of active FM account assignment elements in BCS and FM. This can be checked in IMG activity Activate Account Assignment Elements in Budget Control System.
System Response
Processing stops.
Procedure
Check the budget structure settings according to the given return code.

Hi,
Two things:
a) FMDERIVE is relevant for both former and BCS models. It's a strategy which derives FM objects (not address) for postings of the document which have to be assigned to FM (basically, most of FI and LO documents).
b) Strategy for derivation of budget address is something different. Here, you can tell the system where you want your budget to be checked. For example, the posting goes to fund centre X (either by direct entry or via derivation strategy put in FMDERIVE), but the budget to be checked is on fund centre Y. This functionality could be also achieved with AVC controlling objects, but since you work with budget structure, it's more natural to do it there. If your posting and budget entries are on the same level, then you basically don't need the budget address derivation strategy at all.
Regards,
Eli

Product costing error while defining posting rules

Hi Friends,
When I'm trying to define posting rules for settling WIP using OKG8,
I get an error msg "GL account 7000100 cannot be created as a cost element" and the aforesaid account is WIP (P&L account).
The long text of the error msg is as follows:
G/L account 7000100 cannot be created as a cost element
Message no. KQ119
Diagnosis
When maintaining the posting rules for passing on results analysis data to Financial Accounting, you entered a G/L account that is defined as a primary cost element in cost and revenue element accounting. This is not allowed. You must enter a G/L account in the posting rules that is not defined as a cost element.
System Response
The entry invalid.
Procedure
You have the following options:
Enter a G/L account for which no cost element is specified in Cost and Revenue Element Accounting.
You can change the message type with user-defined error management (transaction OPR4_KKA). What should be observed when you enter a G/L account in a posting rule that is defined as a primary cost element in Cost and Revenue Element Accounting? You need to define a CO account assignment so that the posting defined in the posting rule can be executed. You do this with transaction OKB9 (default account assignment) or OKC9 (substitution), or using the default account assignment in the cost element master.
Could anyone suggest me on this.
The steps that I've already defined as far as the account are concerned:
1. Have defined the aforesaid account as a cost element
2. Assigned Prodn. C CTR in OKB9 agnst the same.
But then I dont understand why the system pops up this msg, saying, cannot be created as a cost element, wherein the account is already a cost element.
Plz suggest
regards
sandhya

Hiya,
WIP accounts (neither Inventory nor Offset) should NEVER be created as Cost Elements.
In most manufacturing scenarios, costs are tracked on the P&L. During period-end, since there is the risk of writing off some issues to the Production/Process/Sales Order, SAP has introduced the complex but ingenious system called Results Analysis that moves the balance of all open Orders to the Balance Sheet.
If the Order balance is (+)ve, the P&L is credited and the Balance Sheet is debited and vice versa. When you display the Order costs at period-end, the WIP costs are not considered. In order to calculate WIP, we have separate RA GL accounts that track costs independently of the Orders. Therefore, these are never created as Cost Elements. Creating these as Cost Elements would force the system to inadvertently post the WIP costs back on the Order (alongwith posting these to the B/S??? - an unimaginable situation).
At period-end, you have postings like:
Dr WIP Inventory Account
Cr WIP Offset Account
and, this is reversed at settlement:
Cr WIP Offset Account
Dr WIP Inventory Account
Along with this, the system calculates the Actual COS for the finished product. Neither of the two WIP accounts used above is created as a Cost Element. If you have created any of these as Cost Elements, the system will not allow you to save OKG8. Delete the Cost Element and then try saving the posting rule.
(PS: The "Cost Element" field in this screen has a different use. It is used to specify if a Secondary Cost Element from the RA Update table should be posted to a G/L Account. This is not meant for Primary Cost Elements. I think these Secondary CEs are of type 31 (requires confirmation - no SAP access right now). As you may have guessed, you can only enter either the RA Category or this Secondary CE).
You may also delete the OKB9 assignment to the Cost Centre. It is redundant.
Hope this helps.
Cheers.

Error while Stock Posting

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for