Error with partitioning

My friend has a macbook unibody (the silver one) and when ever he trys to run boot camp to partition his drive, the application comes up but when you hit continue, it tells you that the software needs to be updated. I have updated everything and it shows it all as being updated but it is still not working. I have tried to find the plist file but can't find any. What is going on?

Fixed it! it turns out the drive has to be journaled. so I just went into disk utility and enabled it and it works fine. I dont know why it doesnt tell you that off the bat. or at least that you have to upgrade your hardware

Similar Messages

Error with Partition Help please.

Hello!
So when I tried to install Windows on my Mac using Boot Camp Assistant, I set my partiton memory to 25 gigs (I have 150 gigs free) and clicked partition. However it said that it couldent be partitioned because some files couldent be moved. I read up on it and it said that you had to restore your computer and defrag it. I would like to avoid this and was wondering what is the matter. I had other partitions on my mac but I deleted them and it appears that my Mac HD is the only partition in disk utility. What is going wrong?

EDIT:
Some people say to boot with the Install CD and use the Disk utility on that to repair the Hard Drive. Does this delete files and apps?

Errors with partitioning by callback or keys (JNI/Java), bug?

Hello,
Just upgraded to 4.8, to test new partitioning features. Seems to be not working for me, or maybe I'm doing something wrong?
Vista 64-bit, Java 1.6.0_16 32-bit, BDB 4.8.24 32-bit.
Callback-based partitioning:
public class InfoDataPartitionHandler implements PartitionHandler {
@Override
public int partition(Database db, DatabaseEntry key) {
return 0; // just testing
DatabaseConfig cfg = new DatabaseConfig();
cfg.setAllowCreate(true);
cfg.setPartitionByCallback(4, new InfoDataPartitionHandler());
cfg.setType(DatabaseType.BTREE);
Database db = env.openDatabase(null,"test",null,cfg);
And this is what I get when running, looks like a bug actually:
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: DatabaseEntry must not be null
at com.sleepycat.db.internal.db_javaJNI.Db_set_partition(Native Method)
at com.sleepycat.db.internal.Db.set_partition(Db.java:497)
at com.sleepycat.db.DatabaseConfig.configureDatabase(DatabaseConfig.java:2206)
at com.sleepycat.db.DatabaseConfig.openDatabase(DatabaseConfig.java:2105)
at com.sleepycat.db.Environment.openDatabase(Environment.java:314)
Key-based partitioning
Things are even worse.
DatabaseEntry k1 = new DatabaseEntry();
StringBinding.stringToEntry("111111111111111111111111", k1);
int sz = k1.getSize();
MultipleDataEntry keys = new MultipleDataEntry(new byte[sz]);
keys.append(k1);
DatabaseConfig cfg = new DatabaseConfig();
cfg.setAllowCreate(true);
cfg.setPartitionByRange(2, keys);
cfg.setType(DatabaseType.BTREE);
Database db = new Database("/tmp/test.db", null, cfg);
db.close();
Exception in thread "main" com.sleepycat.db.DatabaseException: DB_NOTFOUND: No matching key/data pair found: DB_NOTFOUND: No matching key/data pair found
at com.sleepycat.db.internal.db_javaJNI.Db_open(Native Method)
at com.sleepycat.db.internal.Db.open(Db.java:449)
at com.sleepycat.db.DatabaseConfig.openDatabase(DatabaseConfig.java:2106)
at com.sleepycat.db.Database.<init>(Database.java:103)
at Temp.main(Temp.java:23)
Please help.

Hello. Thanks for this report, both situations you've reported are bugs in Berkeley DB. We are currently validating patches internally.
Please contact me directly at ben dot schmeckpeper at the obvious domain.
Thanks,
Ben

Errors with Time Machine (not completing backup, and needing to erase the ".inProgress" package)

I have in a previous discussion been talking about errors with my Time Machine backup. The errors were with a problem with Indexing a file, it fails and stops the whole backup. Each time it attemps another backup, it fills my ".inProgress" package with a (nearly) whole backup, filling my Time Machine hard drive, and thus errasing my previous good backups. The error occurs after about 95% completion.
In my last post of a similar disscussion, the problem was indexing the Preference Pane files and this caused the whole backup to fail. This was my last post there: (below in some additional info of my situation)
I did exclude the MobileMe.prefPane. And I got:
12/16/11 9:24:50.468 PM com.apple.backupd: Starting standard backup
12/16/11 9:24:50.556 PM com.apple.backupd: Backing up to: /Volumes/3 TB GoFlex Drive/Backups.backupdb
12/16/11 9:25:14.418 PM com.apple.backupd: Waiting for index to be ready (101)
12/16/11 9:27:02.366 PM com.apple.backupd: Deep event scan at path:/ reason:must scan subdirs|
12/16/11 9:27:02.366 PM com.apple.backupd: Finished scan
12/16/11 9:33:37.119 PM com.apple.backupd: Deep event scan at path:/Volumes/Mac OS Lion GM reason:must scan subdirs|
12/16/11 9:33:37.119 PM com.apple.backupd: Finished scan
12/16/11 9:36:15.650 PM com.apple.backupd: 758.92 GB required (including padding), 830.32 GB available
12/16/11 10:25:14.873 PM com.apple.backupd: Copied 22.8 GB of 630.5 GB, 782749 of 2357620 items
12/16/11 11:25:15.335 PM com.apple.backupd: Copied 86.6 GB of 630.5 GB, 1167675 of 2357620 items
12/17/11 12:25:16.227 AM com.apple.backupd: Copied 152.2 GB of 630.5 GB, 1393795 of 2357620 items
Dec 17 01:25:16 Thomas-P-Kellys-iMac com.apple.backupd[99858]: Copied 305.2 GB of 630.5 GB, 1413946 of 2357620 items
Dec 17 02:25:16 Thomas-P-Kellys-iMac com.apple.backupd[99858]: Copied 457.1 GB of 630.5 GB, 1419190 of 2357620 items
Dec 17 03:19:07 Thomas-P-Kellys-iMac com.apple.backupd[99858]: Copied 1736865 files (568.3 GB) from volume Macintosh HD.
Dec 17 03:25:16 Thomas-P-Kellys-iMac com.apple.backupd[99858]: Copied 572.1 GB of 630.5 GB, 1848939 of 2357620 items
Dec 17 03:40:33 Thomas-P-Kellys-iMac com.apple.backupd[99858]: Indexing a file failed. Returned 200 for: /Volumes/Mac OS Lion GM/System/Library/PreferencePanes/Mouse.prefPane, /Volumes/3 TB GoFlex Drive/Backups.backupdb/Tom iMac/2011-12-14-171406.inProgress/7DB524DD-EFB9-42A6-8A21-0A2A312EDA6D/Mac OS Lion GM/System/Library/PreferencePanes/Mouse.prefPane
Dec 17 03:40:33 Thomas-P-Kellys-iMac com.apple.backupd[99858]: Aborting backup because indexing a file failed.
Dec 17 03:40:33 Thomas-P-Kellys-iMac com.apple.backupd[99858]: Stopping backup.
Dec 17 03:40:33 Thomas-P-Kellys-iMac com.apple.backupd[99858]: Copied 2164998 files (581.1 GB) from volume Mac OS Lion GM.
Dec 17 03:40:33 Thomas-P-Kellys-iMac com.apple.backupd[99858]: Copy stage failed with error:11
Dec 17 03:40:50 Thomas-P-Kellys-iMac com.apple.backupd[99858]: Backup failed with error: 11
This time it was the Mouse.prefPane that caused the error. I'd like to exclude the entire PreferencePanes directory.
This was my error message this time:
I just realized this was on my small Developers partition. Perhaps there is an error with the build, OR an error with the initial restore. I'd like to perhaps exclude the entire /Volumes/Mac OS Lion GM. I expect that Time Machine is working fine with my main partition and the error happens when it's almost done with the Mac OS Lion GM partition.
The problem now is that I only have 265 GB of 3 TB available on my Time Machine HDD. If attempt another backup, it'll surely erase about 410 GB of my past saved backups. I've already lost 6 months, and I only have two months left of backups. I need to erase the ".inProgress" package again. That'll take time, and it's impossible to do from this main partition, even at root access. This ".inProgress" has a total of two (nearly) full backups; it didn't cleanup the first full backup attempt while starting the second,perhaps it would have had it finished. But I fear even if I exclude the whole "Mac OS Lion GM" partition, It'll create a third full backup before cleanup and erase ~400 GB of previous good backups. Then, I'll have a total of 4 (nearly) full backups! 3 TB is just enough without any past backups.
Maybe I'll just copy my documentations of my 'errasing the ".inProgress" package' last time (from the Mac OS Lion GM partition) and do a full restore of just that partition. Thus erasing the errors all together. If it doesn't fix the errors then this could be a bug in the build that doesn't allow Time Machine to work. I've always included this partition in Time Machine before, even with other Lion builds, so I suspect that it was an error in the initial restore. (I may be answering my own questions, and that the inital restore (of the small partition) is the problem, and I just need to re-restore the small partition)
Again, I'm going to have to erase the ".inProgress" file to regain 1.53 TB of space before proceeding.
Also, I gave myself permission to read the ".Backup.345781513.887697.log", the log that was created last night when I first started Time Machine this last time. It was interesting, but didn't show the error I could see from the console.
Right now, mds and mdworker appear to be going crazy even after I just now turned off Time Machine. I think I'll let it go for the rest of the night. Then I'll work on erasing the ".inProgress" package from the other partition boot up.
That was my entire last post. To add some information, I have two OS X partitons, both Mac OS X Lion. One is my large main partition, the other is one I don't mind testing with. I recently replaced my internal hard drive in my iMac and restored from Time Machine both partitions. This appeared to go smoothly. But I have yet to create a single successful Time Machine backup since. At first it was doing a Full Backup, which I didn't like, but now it just aborts around 95% completion. Each, time, it tries it fills the Time Machine hard drive with duplicate (nearly) full backups errasing my older good backups. I would like to erase the ".inProgress" file to save space.
My main question in this new discussion is does anyone know of a good way of erasing the ".inProgress" file? This is so I can preseerve my previous backups. ACLs and other permissions seem to make it impossible to erase from this startup partition, the one I'm running Time Machine from. Even at root level, if I give myself permission to change permissions or delete a file, it'll say Operation not Permitted instead of Permission Denied. I have been able to delete this ".inProgress" package before when booting from the other partition, but with great difficulty. I have had much help from another Member in this Support Community when it comes to solving my Time Machine problems. I think I have found the problem (indexing files in my small OS X partition), as stated in my copy& pasted post above, but I really need to delete this inProgress package first to save space before continuing!

Pondini wrote:
Gator TPK wrote:
Now I'll have to fix the small partition? How's the best way to do this? There could be thousands of files that won't index fine.
See if there's anything you haven't done, that applies, in the pink box of #C3 in Time Machine - Troubleshooting
Otherwise, since most (or all?) of the indexing errors are in OSX, you might want to just reinstall it. Something may have gone wrong sometime, that damaged those files.
I reviewed #C3 in Time Machine - Troubleshooting and I have already done most of those things. I have just learned something new though:
When I included my Main OS X partition again, I got an indexing error for the first time for that partition. I might be interesting to note that the _spotlight process was running, and it's running again (the magnifying glass has a dot and it generically says "Indexing Tom's iMac"). mdworker, mds and backupd processes really are working hard, one moment they used over 500% of my CPU. It's nice to know for once quad core is good for something other than video encoding. (Now if they could just get the Finder to do more than 100.1%, only 1 thread is doing 100%, I'd like to see file size calculations 8 times quicker!)
I never got an indexing error once in the past 2 weeks for that large Mac OS X v10.7.2 main volume, and it had appeared to finish that partition backup before running into problems with my smaller test partition. Also, I had just updated the smaller test partition with a later build of Mac OS X. But It appears that the beta builds are clearly not the problem. I thought I could just restore again (from the December 4th backup) the small partition and both would be fine.
I'll finish reviewing all the suggestions on Time Machine - Troubleshooting and go from there. Hopefully, the _spotlight indexing simutaniously was the only problem. It's strange that the indexing hasn't happened since the original restore last week untill I finally got a good clean complete partial Time Machine backup. Why would the first Time Machine backup trigger indexing again?
For now, I'm going to exclude the Main Partition again, and let another good backup run. And try your suggestions. (And wait till mds, mdworker, etc. to finish!)
I have the logs of the first two sucsessful backups and the last two failed backups from the last 3 hours, if that would help.?

Table creation with partition

following is the table creation script with partition
CREATE TABLE customer_entity_temp (
BRANCH_ID NUMBER (4),
ACTIVE_FROM_YEAR VARCHAR2 (4),
ACTIVE_FROM_MONTH VARCHAR2 (3),
partition by range (ACTIVE_FROM_YEAR,ACTIVE_FROM_MONTH)
(partition yr7_1999 values less than ('1999',TO_DATE('Jul','Mon')),
partition yr12_1999 values less than ('1999',TO_DATE('Dec','Mon')),
it gives an error
ORA-14036: partition bound value too large for column
but if I increase the size of the ACTIVE_FROM_MONTH column to 9 , the script works and creates the table. Why is it so ?
Also, by creating a table in this way and populating the table data in their respective partitions, all rows with month less than "JULY" will go in yr7_1999 partition and all rows with month value between "JUL" and "DEC" will go in the second partition yr12_1999 , where will the data with month value equal to "DEC" go?
Plz help me in solving this problem
thanks n regards
Moloy

Hi,
You declared ACTIVE_FROM_MONTH VARCHAR2 (3) and you try to check it against a date in your partitionning clause:TO_DATE('Jul','Mon')so you should first check your data model and what you are trying to achieve exactly.
With such a partition decl, you will not be able to insert dates from december 1998 included and onward. The values are stricly less than (<) not less or equal(<=) hence such lines can't be inserted. I'd advise you to check the MAXVALUE value jocker and the ENABLE ROW MOVEMENT partitionning clause.
Regards,
Yoann.

Cannot format my iMac. Problem with partition's file

I cannot format my iMac because Disk Utility sends an error: The partition map needs to be repaired because there's a problem with the EFI system partition's file system. Any suggestions?

The problem began when the Time machine excluded my home folder of the backup. I could not include it again in the process (not in system preferences, nor anything else), so I decided to format the HD and make a fresh install of OSX Mavericks. I could not do this because Disk Utility cannot unmount the partition when formatting the HD, and the error arose. I simply cannot fix this, and before giving up and take it to a Mac repair shop, I would like to try by myself.

Using AGO function with partitions

I have a situation where we have logical sources with the same repository folder that are partitioned. We would like to use the AGO function but are getting the following error:
State: HY000. Code: 10058. [NQODBC] [SQL_STATE: HY000] [nQSError: 10058] A general error has occurred. [nQSError: 22042] AGO function may not be used on '# Applied Invoices' because its source is horizontally partitioned. (HY000)
Has anyone had success using the AGO function with partitions? If not, do you have an alternate solution to the problem?

AGO doesn't work with partitions - it's documented on metalink....there's an enhancement request , but that's it - no work-around provided....I'd suggest creating a common view for that particular report

Troubles editing tables with partitions

I'm running SQL Developer 1.5.3 against Oracle 10/11 databases and SQL Developer has trouble with my partitioned tables. Both the schema owner and sys users experience the same problems.
The first time I try to edit a table, I get an "Error Loading Objects" dialog with a NullPointException message. If I immediately turn around and try to edit the table again, I get the Edit Table dialog. That's annoying but there's at least a work-around.
Next, if I select the Indexes pane, I can view the first index but selecting another one results in an "Index Error on <table>" error dialog. The message is "There are no table partitions on which to define local index partitions". At this point, selecting any of the other panes (Columns, Primary Key, etc.) results in the same dialog. While the main Partitions tab shows my partitions, I cannot see them in the Edit Table dialog. In fact, the Partition Definitions and Subpartition Templates panes are blank.
Does anyone else see this behavior? Version 1.5.1 behaved the same way so it's not new.
Of course I've figured out how to do everything I need through SQL but it would be handy if I could just use the tool.
Thank you.

Most of my tables are generated from a script so this morning I decided to just create a very basic partitioned table. It contained a NUMBER primary key and a TIMESTAMP(6) column to use with partitioning. That table worked just fine in SQL Developer.
At that point I tried to figure out what is different about my tables and I finally found the difference... Oracle Spatial. If I add an MDSYS.SDO_GEOMETRY column to my partitioned table, SQL Developer starts having issues.
I also have the GeoRaptor plugin installed so I had to wonder if it was interfering with SQL Developer. I couldn't find an option to uninstall an extension so I went into the sqldeveloper/extensions directory and removed GeoRaptorLibs and org.GeoRaptor.jar. GeoRaptor doesn't appear to be installed in SQL Developer anymore but I still see the same behavior.
It appears that there is an issue in SQL Developer with Oracle Spatial and partitioning. Can someone confirm this?

Problems with partition tables

Hi all,
I've got some problems with partition tables. The script at the bottom run but when I wanna insert some values it returns me an error
(ORA-06550: line 1, column 30: PL/SQL: ORA-06552: PL/SQL: Compilation unit analysis terminated
ORA-06553: PLS-320: the declaration of the type of this expression is incomplete or malformed
ORA-06550: line 1, column 7: PL/SQL: SQL Statement ignored)
and I can't understand why!
There's something incorrect in the script or not?
Please help me
Thanks in advance
Steve
CREATE TABLE TW_E_CUSTOMER_UNIFIED
ID_CUSTOMER_UNIFIED VARCHAR2 (27) NOT NULL ,
START_VALIDITY_DATE DATE NOT NULL ,
END_VALIDITY_DATE DATE ,
CUSTOMER_STATUS VARCHAR2 (255)
PARTITION BY RANGE (START_VALIDITY_DATE)
SUBPARTITION BY LIST (END_VALIDITY_DATE)
PARTITION M200909 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE('20091001','YYYYMMDD'))
(SUBPARTITION M200909_N VALUES (NULL), SUBPARTITION M200909_NN VALUES (DEFAULT)),
PARTITION M200910 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE('20091101','YYYYMMDD'))
(SUBPARTITION M200910_N VALUES (NULL), SUBPARTITION M200910_NN VALUES (DEFAULT)),
PARTITION M200911 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE('20091201','YYYYMMDD'))
(SUBPARTITION M200911_N VALUES (NULL), SUBPARTITION M200911_NN VALUES (DEFAULT)),
PARTITION M200912 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE('20100101','YYYYMMDD'))
(SUBPARTITION M200912_N VALUES (NULL), SUBPARTITION M200912_NN VALUES (DEFAULT)),
PARTITION M201001 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE('20100201','YYYYMMDD'))
(SUBPARTITION M201001_N VALUES (NULL), SUBPARTITION M201001_NN VALUES (DEFAULT)),
PARTITION M201002 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE('20100301','YYYYMMDD'))
(SUBPARTITION M201002_N VALUES (NULL), SUBPARTITION M201002_NN VALUES (DEFAULT)),
PARTITION M210001 VALUES LESS THAN (MAXVALUE))
(SUBPARTITION M210001_N VALUES (NULL), SUBPARTITION M210001_NN VALUES (DEFAULT))
;

Hi Hoek,
the DB version is 10.2 (italian version, then SET is correct).
...there's something strange: now I can INSERT rows but I can't update them!
I'm using this command string:
UPDATE TW_E_CUSTOMER_UNIFIED SET END_VALIDITY_DATE = TO_DATE('09-SET-09', 'DD-MON-RR') WHERE
id_customer_unified = '123' and start_validity_date = TO_DATE('09-SET-09', 'DD-MON-RR');
And this is the error:
Error SQL: ORA-14402: updating partition key column would cause a partition change
14402. 00000 - "updating partition key column would cause a partition change"
*Cause: An UPDATE statement attempted to change the value of a partition
key column causing migration of the row to another partition
*Action: Do not attempt to update a partition key column or make sure that
the new partition key is within the range containing the old
partition key.
I think that is impossible to use a PARTITION/SUBPARTITION like that: in fact the update of "END_VALIDITY_DATE" cause a partition change.
Do u agree or it's possible an update on a field that implies a partition change?
Regards Steve

Problems Faced with Partitions in Oracle 9i.

I have a doubt regarding the partitions in Oracle 9i can you please help me regarding this?
Create table t1
( x number,
y number,
z number);
insert into t1 values (1,1,1);
insert into t1 values (2,2,2);
insert into t1 values (3,3,3);
Create table t2
x number,
y number,
z number
partition by range(x)
partition p1 values less than(2),
partition p2 values less than(3),
partition p3 values less than(4),
partition p4 values less than(maxvalue)
alter table t2 exchange partition p1 with table t1;
SQL> alter table t2 exchange partition p1 with table t1;
alter table t2 exchange partition p1 with table t1
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-14099: all rows in table do not qualify for specified partition
WHAT DOES THIS ERROR MESSAGE MEAN? I AM NOT ABLE TO UNDERSTAND THIS? WHAT NEED's TO BE DONE TO RESOLVE THIS?
alter table t2 exchange partition p1 with table t1 WITHOUT VALIDATION;
SQL> SELECT * FROM T2;
X Y Z
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
SQL> SELECT * FROM T2 PARTITION(P1);
X Y Z
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
SQL> SELECT * FROM T2 PARTITION(P2);
no rows selected
SQL> SELECT * FROM T2 PARTITION(P3);
no rows selected
(i) Why i am facing this error ORA-14099: while partitioning? Can you please brief me about this ?
(ii) why there is not data's in the PARTITIONS p2 &p3 after the partitions is exchanged WITHOUT VALIDATION options?
what is going with this method?
(iii) Also can you please explain me with an example how to partitions a table having milliion of records with EXCHANGE PARTITION Options with MULITPLE partition segment's (say partition based on status id column with 6 differnt values i am thinking to use list partitions using status_id as partition key) ?
Also i have tried the below approch is this a right approch? please correct me if i am wrong.
Create table t1
( x number,
y number,
z number);
insert into t1 values (1,1,1);
insert into t1 values (2,2,2);
insert into t1 values (3,3,3);
commit;
Create table t2
x number,
y number,
z number
partition by range(x)
partition p1 values less than(2),
partition p2 values less than(3),
partition p3 values less than(4),
partition p4 values less than(maxvalue)
SQL> insert into t2 select * from t1;
3 rows created.
SQL> commit;
Commit complete.
SQL> SELECT * FROM T2 PARTITION(P1);
X Y Z
1 1 1
SQL> SELECT * FROM T2 PARTITION(P2);
X Y Z
2 2 2
SQL> SELECT * FROM T2 PARTITION(P3);
X Y Z
3 3 3
SQL> SELECT * FROM T2 PARTITION(P4);
no rows selected
EXPLAIN PLAN
FOR SELECT * FROM T2 WHERE X = 1
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost | Pstart| Pstop |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 9 | 2 | | |
| 1 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | T2 | 1 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
Now my question is what is problem instead of using EXCHANGE PARTITION why caun't we follow this above approch?
to partition a non-partitioned table?
Thanks,
Rajesh.

The value of 3 should obviously should go into the partition P3.Then why are you putting it into p1?
Your command,
<tt> alter table t2 exchange partition <b>p1</b> with table t1;</tt>
will swap partition p1 with the contents of table t1, leaving you with partition p1 containing the three values that were in t1. At first it told you there were rows in t1 that did not belong in that partition, but you used FORCE so it put them in anyway.
btw there are notes in the FAQ about how to use ** tags to format your posts.
~Edited by: William Robertson on Oct 15, 2008 6:49 AM~

Airport Utility `install failed' error with both 6.0 and 6.1

Hi folks
I am running Mac OS X Lion 10.7.4 (11E53) and cannot get the Airport Utility to run at all. [5.5.3] The application icon flickers as though it is about to launch and then nothing happens.
I have tried other 5.x downloads and they all fail because I am running OS X Lion 10.7.4.
Doing a standard Software Update or using a download of 6.x from the Apple Support site, the installer comes up with an `install failed' error with both 6.0 and 6.1, having gotten through the complete process and looking like they were `successful'.
It's the only time in two years and many updates later that i have come across this issue, so I am unsure how to start to tackle it.
Any ideas or suggestions please?
Thanks in advance.

Welcome to Apple Communities
Backup your files and try this:
1. Reboot from recovery partition (or as in my case USB recovery drive)
2. Select Re-install Mac OS X
3. Allow the process to run through multiple restarts
4. When reinstall process is complete run software update (side note, my software update would not launch as long as my USB recovery stick was plugged in, weird)
5. Run all updates saving the Airport Utility 6.0 until last.
6. Install the airport utility from software update.

Arch 0.7 Wombat full iso error with logical volumes

I have a 160 GB ide-hd as primary master in my system.
Whenever i create logical partitions through the installer and try to give them a filesystem i get errors.
the installer reports unable to mount /mnt/usr or not enough space to mount.
Checking the partition table with Partition magic 8 dos tells that the extended partition starts above cil. 1024 and should be of type extendedX.
I let PM8 repair the table and go back to the archlinux install that now works fine.
it looks to me like the error is in cfdisk 2.12a.

Nope, cfdisk gave no errors or reboot instructions.
1 time i tested this, used the install cd to create 1 primary and 1 logical volume , rebooted and tried /arch/setup without success.
rebooted with PM8 rescue cd, repair things, rebooted again with arch cd and install went on without problems.
It looks like cfdisk/large HD's / logical volumes don't work well together.
I have switched to using LVM since then, so i don't need physical logical volumes anymore.

Is it possible to create table with partition in compress mode

Hi All,
I want to create a table in compress option, with partitions. When i create with partitions the compression isnt enabled, but with noramal table creation the compression option is enables.
My question is:
cant we create a table with partition/subpartition in compress mode..? Please help.
Below is the code that i have used for table creation.
CREATE TABLE temp
TRADE_ID                    NUMBER,
SRC_SYSTEM_ID               VARCHAR2(60 BYTE),
SRC_TRADE_ID                VARCHAR2(60 BYTE),
SRC_TRADE_VERSION           VARCHAR2(60 BYTE),
ORIG_SRC_SYSTEM_ID          VARCHAR2(30 BYTE),
TRADE_STATUS                VARCHAR2(60 BYTE),
TRADE_TYPE                  VARCHAR2(60 BYTE),
SECURITY_TYPE               VARCHAR2(60 BYTE),
VOLUME                      NUMBER,
ENTRY_DATE                  DATE,
    REASON                      VARCHAR2(255 BYTE),
TABLESPACE data
PCTUSED    0
PCTFREE    10
INITRANS   1
MAXTRANS   255
NOLOGGING
COMPRESS
NOCACHE
PARALLEL (DEGREE 6 INSTANCES 1)
MONITORING
PARTITION BY RANGE (TRADE_DATE)
SUBPARTITION BY LIST (SRC_SYSTEM_ID)
SUBPARTITION TEMPLATE
(SUBPARTITION SALES VALUES ('sales'),
   SUBPARTITION MAG VALUES ('MAG'),
   SUBPARTITION SPI VALUES ('SPI', 'SPIM', 'SPIIA'),
   SUBPARTITION FIS VALUES ('FIS'),
   SUBPARTITION GD VALUES ('GS'),
   SUBPARTITION ST VALUES ('ST'),
   SUBPARTITION KOR VALUES ('KOR'),
   SUBPARTITION BLR VALUES ('BLR'),
   SUBPARTITION SUT VALUES ('SUT'),
   SUBPARTITION RM VALUES ('RM'),
   SUBPARTITION DEFAULT VALUES (default)
PARTITION RMS_TRADE_DLY_MAX VALUES LESS THAN (MAXVALUE)
    LOGGING
        TABLESPACE data
     ( SUBPARTITION TS_MAX_SALES VALUES ('SALES')      TABLESPACE data,
    SUBPARTITION TS_MAX_MAG VALUES ('MAG')      TABLESPACE data,
    SUBPARTITION TS_MAX_SPI VALUES ('SPI', 'SPIM', 'SPIIA')      TABLESPACE data,
    SUBPARTITION TS_MAX_FIS VALUES ('FIS')      TABLESPACE data,
    SUBPARTITION TS_MAX_GS VALUES ('GS')      TABLESPACE data,
    SUBPARTITION TS_MAX_ST VALUES ('ST')      TABLESPACE data,
    SUBPARTITION TS_MAX_KOR VALUES ('KOR')      TABLESPACE data,
    SUBPARTITION TS_MAX_BLR VALUES ('BLR')      TABLESPACE data,
    SUBPARTITION TS_MAX_SUT VALUES ('SUT')      TABLESPACE data,
    SUBPARTITION TS_MAX_RM VALUES ('RM')      TABLESPACE data,
    SUBPARTITION TS_MAX_DEFAULT VALUES (default)      TABLESPACE data)); Edited by: user11942774 on 8 Dec, 2011 5:17 AM

user11942774 wrote:
I want to create a table in compress option, with partitions. When i create with partitions the compression isnt enabled, but with noramal table creation the compression option is enables. First of all your CREATE TABLE statement is full of syntax errors. Next time test it before posting - we don't want to spend time on fixing things not related to your question.
Now, I bet you check COMPRESSION value of partitioned table same way you do it for a non-partitioned table - in USER_TABLES - and therefore get wrong results. Since compreesion can be enabled on individual partition level you need to check COMPRESSION in USER_TAB_PARTITIONS:
SQL> CREATE TABLE temp
2 (
3    TRADE_ID                    NUMBER,
4    SRC_SYSTEM_ID               VARCHAR2(60 BYTE),
5    SRC_TRADE_ID                VARCHAR2(60 BYTE),
6    SRC_TRADE_VERSION           VARCHAR2(60 BYTE),
7    ORIG_SRC_SYSTEM_ID          VARCHAR2(30 BYTE),
8    TRADE_STATUS                VARCHAR2(60 BYTE),
9    TRADE_TYPE                  VARCHAR2(60 BYTE),
10    SECURITY_TYPE               VARCHAR2(60 BYTE),
11    VOLUME                      NUMBER,
12    ENTRY_DATE                  DATE,
13      REASON                      VARCHAR2(255 BYTE),
14    TRADE_DATE                  DATE
15 )
16 TABLESPACE users
17 PCTUSED    0
18 PCTFREE    10
19 INITRANS   1
20 MAXTRANS   255
21 NOLOGGING
22 COMPRESS
23 NOCACHE
24 PARALLEL (DEGREE 6 INSTANCES 1)
25 MONITORING
26 PARTITION BY RANGE (TRADE_DATE)
27 SUBPARTITION BY LIST (SRC_SYSTEM_ID)
28 SUBPARTITION TEMPLATE
29    (SUBPARTITION SALES VALUES ('sales'),
30     SUBPARTITION MAG VALUES ('MAG'),
31     SUBPARTITION SPI VALUES ('SPI', 'SPIM', 'SPIIA'),
32     SUBPARTITION FIS VALUES ('FIS'),
33     SUBPARTITION GD VALUES ('GS'),
34     SUBPARTITION ST VALUES ('ST'),
35     SUBPARTITION KOR VALUES ('KOR'),
36     SUBPARTITION BLR VALUES ('BLR'),
37     SUBPARTITION SUT VALUES ('SUT'),
38     SUBPARTITION RM VALUES ('RM'),
39     SUBPARTITION DEFAULT_SUB VALUES (default)
40    )
41 (
42   PARTITION RMS_TRADE_DLY_MAX VALUES LESS THAN (MAXVALUE)
43      LOGGING
44          TABLESPACE users
45       ( SUBPARTITION TS_MAX_SALES VALUES ('SALES')      TABLESPACE users,
46      SUBPARTITION TS_MAX_MAG VALUES ('MAG')      TABLESPACE users,
47      SUBPARTITION TS_MAX_SPI VALUES ('SPI', 'SPIM', 'SPIIA')      TABLESPACE users,
48      SUBPARTITION TS_MAX_FIS VALUES ('FIS')      TABLESPACE users,
49      SUBPARTITION TS_MAX_GS VALUES ('GS')      TABLESPACE users,
50      SUBPARTITION TS_MAX_ST VALUES ('ST')      TABLESPACE users,
51      SUBPARTITION TS_MAX_KOR VALUES ('KOR')      TABLESPACE users,
52      SUBPARTITION TS_MAX_BLR VALUES ('BLR')      TABLESPACE users,
53      SUBPARTITION TS_MAX_SUT VALUES ('SUT')      TABLESPACE users,
54      SUBPARTITION TS_MAX_RM VALUES ('RM')      TABLESPACE users,
55      SUBPARTITION TS_MAX_DEFAULT VALUES (default)      TABLESPACE users));
Table created.
SQL>
SQL>
SQL> SELECT PARTITION_NAME,
2          COMPRESSION
3    FROM USER_TAB_PARTITIONS
4    WHERE TABLE_NAME = 'TEMP'
5 /
PARTITION_NAME                 COMPRESS
RMS_TRADE_DLY_MAX              ENABLED
SQL> SELECT COMPRESSION
2    FROM USER_TABLES
3    WHERE TABLE_NAME = 'TEMP'
4 /
COMPRESS
SQL> SY.

Erroneous "insufficient disk space" error with WaveStudio 7

This has been bugging me for over 2 years. I get the "Insufficient disk space" error with Vista x32 and x64 and now with Windows 7 x64 when I've edited a wav file and then try to save it. I have plenty of disk space.
I've searched till I'm blue in the face but cannot find an answer and am tired of the lame work-around. I know how to copy and paste the entire edited wav into another file and then save it. It's annoying, but it works. What gets me is why is this not fixed?
Running CTWave.exe as administrator does not work. Running in Windows XP SP3 compatibility mode does not work.
I have been a faithful Creative Labs user for more years than I care to remember, but this one is shaking my faith. Is there anybody who can explain why this happens, or offer a fix?
Many thanks and keep on rockin',
Dave

You may wish to try these steps in order to solve your issue:
1. Make sure your computer has the latest Java runtime. To do this, just google search "Download Java", go to the first URL and download that free software. This step should solve most of the "insufficient disk space" problems.
2. If step 1 failed to work, you can open "My computer", right click on the hard disk you were trying to write your files into. From the "File System" tab, check to see it's "NTFS" but not "FAT32".
3. If the above two steps do not work, try creating a new partition from your primary hard disk. To do this, click "Start" -> then right click "My Computer" -> "Manage" -> "Disk Management" -> Make sure you shrink a new volume for at least 50 GB to 100 GB free disk space, again please have the NTFS file system. Once you successfully created this new partition, do a format then try writing your music files onto this Disk.
4. I think the above 3 steps are able to solve your issue. However, there's a bug I found sometime back when Win 7 first released. You can try creating a "temp" folder in your primary system drive, writing any files in there should have no problem as long as disk space is sufficient.
5. I certainly do not hope that error was caused by your anti-virus programme, but if all failed, you may want to consider temporarily disable your anti-virus software, and if everything works fine, you might want to switch to a new anti-virus programme.
Cheers.
Originally Posted by bghcomposer
Dave, I also have this problem. I recently bought new components for a new computer and put it together myself. I took Audigy 2zs Platinum Pro out of my old computer (if it ain't broke, don't fix it!) and put it in the new one. After getting the drivers and programs downloaded and installed, I too, have an "insufficient disk space" error. It also won't record - where it would work wonderfully on my other computer!
As a music teacher, I record piano parts for the students to sing to, but I can no longer do that! This would be a great fix! Hope someone responds with an answer!
Brian

RE: [Adobe Reader] when i open pdf file it open all the pages but some pages give error massage (there was error processing a page,there was a problem reading this document 110) but if i open this page which give me error with google chrome it's work ? i

HelloThank's for your helpsI hope this document is helpfulBest Regards,
Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2014 17:10:17 -0700
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: when i open pdf file it open all the pages but some pages give error massage (there was error processing a page,there was a problem reading this document 110) but if i open this page which give me error with google chrome it's work ? if you can help me th
    when i open pdf file it open all the pages but some pages give error massage (there was error processing a page,there was a problem reading this document 110) but if i open this page which give me error with google chrome it's work ? if you can help m
    created by Anoop9178 in Adobe Reader - View the full discussion
Hi,
Would it be possible for you to share the document?
Regards,
Anoop
     Please note that the Adobe Forums do not accept email attachments. If you want to embed a screen image in your message please visit the thread in the forum to embed the image at https://forums.adobe.com/message/6485431#6485431
     Replies to this message go to everyone subscribed to this thread, not directly to the person who posted the message. To post a reply, either reply to this email or visit the message page:
     To unsubscribe from this thread, please visit the message page at . In the Actions box on the right, click the Stop Email Notifications link.
     Start a new discussion in Adobe Reader by email or at Adobe Community
For more information about maintaining your forum email notifications please go to http://forums.adobe.com/thread/416458?tstart=0.

thank's for reply and your help
i did the step's that you told me but i still have the same problem
                                 i have the latest v.11.0.7
i
i disable the protected mode

Error with partitioning

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for