EVC no service, bridgedomain Service

Hi All,
I have cisco 36xx connected to l2 node,
we have the servcies on the bridge domain, but not on the evc of mpls;
Please find the below config of bridgedomain & EVC.
(Internet )BRAS -> Huawei DX(57xx)-> Cisco 36xx->CTS(3rd party)
EVC CONFIGURATION:
interface Port-channel4
switchport trunk allowed vlan none
switchport mode trunk
no keepalive
service instance 1 ethernet
encapsulation dot1q 201-300
xconnect 10.50.7.201 3841 encapsulation mpls
BRiDGE DOMAIN(service instance/EFP):
interface Port-channel4
switchport trunk allowed vlan none
switchport mode trunk
no keepalive
service instance 1 ethernet
encapsulation dot1q 201-300
bridge-domain 3841
Please help me out.
Thanks
Kumar

I had the same issue (iPAD version 4.3.3) and it wouldn't connect to 3G in the house which I know has good signal. I tried several times turning off the Cellular Data switch and putting it into flight mode, leaving it for a while, doing a hard reset several times but still the darn thing gave "no signal". Guess a hard reset isn't as hard as it could be.
Fiddled with the automatic carrier then but when I pressed this it just whirled away for minutes. Then
Put machine into flight mode and turned it off.
Removed SIM.
Rebooted and made sure I got the no sim card message.
Turned off machine again
Replaced sim and at last success it found 3G.

Similar Messages

ME3400E - 802.1ad, QinQ, EVC

Hi,
Ive been reading through documentation and posts in the forum about L2 tunneling EVC etc.. but some items are still confusing so if some people out there can shed some light would be great.
Im using 7600 with ES+ cards and ME3400E, Aim is to setup a L2 tunnel for a customer over an SP network (I run the SP network)
Q1. Am I correct in saying that QinQ is proprietary version of the technology while 802.1ad is the standardised version but they essentially achieve the same thing (abit like ISL and dot1q vlans) and you would use either one or the other ?
For QinQ config like this on the customer facing port should do it
int g0/1
switchport mode dot1q tunnel <-- (setup the l2 tunnel for C tagged frames and apply S vlan)
switchport access vlan 5 <-- the S vlan to apply as the second outer tag
l2 protocol tunnel <-- tunnel not process L2 control frames like STP, CDP
For 802.1ad we achieve the same by saying:
int g0/1
ethernet dot1ad uni s-port <-- (setup the l2 tunnel for C tagged frames and apply S vlan)
switchport access vlan 5 <-- the S vlan to apply as the second outer tag
l2 protocol forward <-- tunnel not process L2 control frames like STP, CDP
Q2. 8021.ad uses a different ethertype 0x88a8 instead of the standard 0x8100 for QinQ which is also used by v802.1q tagged frames - what are the advantages of using a different ethertype, and also what are the advantages of using dot1.ad compared to QinQ ethertype aside ? Im aware that 0x8100 frames arriving on a 0x88a8 port are considered untagged. Im just not seeing the reason to deploy with 0x88a8. Would apreciate any feedback from people using this in their daily operations and some pointers to any useful docs.
Q3. The above config are lets say a more traditional config approach. I see that it is possible to also do this with EVC and service instances.
Would something like the below achieve the same as what I mention in Q1 above ?
int g0/1
service instance 1
encapsulation dot1q
bridge domain 5
Is this functionally equivalent to QinQ since we match all tagged frames, we do not pop the vlan tag, but place in bridge domain 5 for forwarding where vlan 5 can be considered as the S vlan ?
Likewise the 802.1ad equivalent would be:
int g0/1
ethernet dot1ad uni s-port
service instance 1
encapsulation dot1q
bridge domain 5
thanks
Mark

I'm far from an expert in Metro Ethernet, but I was facing similar questions
as you (see also https://supportforums.cisco.com/thread/2200327), so let me give a try :
> Q1. Am I correct in saying that QinQ is proprietary version of the
> technology while 802.1ad is the standardised version but they
> essentially achieve the same thing (abit like ISL and dot1q vlans) and
> you would use either one or the other ?
I would agree with that.
> Q2. 8021.ad uses a different ethertype 0x88a8 instead of the standard
> 0x8100 for QinQ which is also used by v802.1q tagged frames - what are
> the advantages of using a different ethertype, and also what are the
> advantages of using dot1.ad compared to QinQ ethertype aside ? Im
> aware that 0x8100 frames arriving on a 0x88a8 port are considered
> untagged. Im just not seeing the reason to deploy with 0x88a8. Would
> apreciate any feedback from people using this in their daily
> operations and some pointers to any useful docs.
The advantage of 0x88a8 is compatibility with non-Cisco equipment,
especially if that equipment doesn't have a 'Cisco compatibility'
feature to use 0x8100 for the S-tag. The Metro Ethernet forum
(MEF) always consistently mentions 0x88a8 for the outer
encapsulation (S-tag).
You can also check out a Cisco document, namely
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/metro/me3600x_3800x/software/design/guide/CE2.0_certification_v1.pdf
From what I see there, the 7600 and ASR9000 can interface to unknown Metro Ethernet
via dot1ad. I believe that the ME3800X cannot, have seen no options for "dot1ad"
or "0x88a8" (I mean that probably they can only use 0x8100 for outer tag and you
can't interface them to non-Cisco equipment).
> Q3. The above config are lets say a more traditional config approach.
> I see that it is possible to also do this with EVC and service
> instances.
Agreed.
I will follow this post, please add to this post if you learn something new.
Patrick

Asr 9000 evc grouping

Do the ASR 9000's support EVC grouping / service group qos similar to the ES-20's cards?
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/routers/7600/install_config/ES20_config_guide/bald_qos.html#wp1453539

The ASR9000 has a feature called "Shared Policy Instance" which allows to apply a service-policy to the aggregate traffic of a set of subinterfaces:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/routers/asr9000/software/asr9k_r4.0/qos/configuration/guide/qc40clas.html#wp1895131
Hope this helps,
JC

L2 tunnel between me3600x and 3925

Hello,
We are currently trying to configure a l2tunnel between a ME3600X (running 15.3(3)S3 with the AdvancedMetroIPAccess licence) and a 3925 (running 15.0(1)M2 with the datak9 licence).
We are part of a CsC architecture, playing the role of the customer carrier, using BGP for label distribution between the Backbone carrier and the Customer carrier.
Our architecture is quite flat as the CE and PE roles are on the same routers.
we have the view on the following architecture and can configure the R1, RCV1, RCV2 and R2 routers :
R1 --- RCV1---(Backbone Carrier)---RCV2--- R2
We have 3 sites A,B and C but only 2 dark fibers to connect them.
We are using the CsC to build a L2 tunnel and close the triangle :
   A-ME=tun=3925-B
     df          df
               C
For year were using a 2911 and a 3900 to build the tunnel and it was good. The tunnel was build with an xconnect l2tpv3.
we replaced our 2911 for a ME3600X few weeks ago following the advice of our backbone CsC contact, and we are now facing the following problem :
the configuration we used is not working any more : we can build the tunnel but the spanning tree BDPU are not passing through (We use rstp for spanning-tree protocol).
3925 : ______________
pseudowire-class backup-sro-ypa
encapsulation l2tpv3
ip local interface GigabitEthernet0/0/0.777
interface GigabitEthernet0/1
description interface connecting site B
no ip address
duplex auto
speed auto
no keepalive
no cdp enable
xconnect 10.193.32.50 5 pw-class backup-sro-ypa
interface GigabitEthernet0/0/0.777
description interface facing the CsC
encapsulation dot1Q 777
ip address 10.193.32.42 255.255.255.252
mpls bgp forwarding
ME3600 : ______________
pseudowire-class backup-ypa-sro
encapsulation l2tpv3
sequencing both
ip local interface Vlan777
interface GigabitEthernet0/1
description interface facing the CsC
switchport trunk allowed vlan none
switchport mode trunk
mtu 1512
service instance 777 ethernet
description *** Transport vers to CsC***
encapsulation dot1q 777
rewrite ingress tag pop 1 symmetric
l2protocol tunnel
bridge-domain 777
interface GigabitEthernet0/2
description interface connecting site A
no switchport
no ip address
xconnect 10.193.32.42 5 encapsulation l2tpv3 pw-class backup-ypa-sro
interface Vlan777
description vers RCV
dampening
mtu 1512
ip address 10.193.32.50 255.255.255.252
no ip unreachables
mpls bgp forwarding
As we have no experience with the ME3600X and their EVC and service instance concepts we have a hard time figuring out what solution to use :
- According to this post l2tpv3 is not supported on the ME3600X : https://supportforums.cisco.com/discussion/11919131/configuring-pseudowire-between-3800-router-and-me3600x
- According to this one it seems possible to interoperate a tunnel between a 2911 and a Me3600 : https://supportforums.cisco.com/discussion/11848451/eompls-and-layer-2-tunneling
Our need is slightly different though, as we are trying to pass a dot1Q trunk in the tunnel.
We tried to switch to encapsulation mpls, with no luck so far...
Any help or feedback would be greatly appreciated.
Best Regards,
Jérôme Schlumberger

News from the lab...
I decided to start again my config from scratch :
On the ME3600X___________ :
pseudowire-class backup-ypa-sro
encapsulation l2tpv3
ip local interface Vlan777
sequencing both
interface GigabitEthernet0/2
description *** Backup L2 VLans Internes avec RSROHES1 ***
no switchport
no ip address
no keepalive
no cdp enable
xconnect 10.193.32.42 5 pw-class backup-ypa-sro
On the 3900___________
pseudowire-class backup-sro-ypa
encapsulation l2tpv3
ip local interface GigabitEthernet0/0/0.777
sequencing both
interface GigabitEthernet0/1
description Tunnel_BB_HEIGVD
no ip address
duplex auto
speed auto
no keepalive
no cdp enable
xconnect 10.193.32.50 5 pw-class backup-sro-ypa
-> The "sequencing both" is mandatory to get the tunnel UP.
-> I configured l3 interfaces on the devices facing the ends of the tunnel and I can't ping them. Looking a little bit more carefully, I noticed that the arp table does not fill on the 3900, but it does on the 3600. I guessed that's a limitation on the 3600, but still not sure.
I then tried to switch to mpls encapsulation with the following configuration :
On the ME3600X_____________________________
pseudowire-class backup-ypa-sro
encapsulation mpls
interface GigabitEthernet0/2
description *** Backup L2 VLans Internes avec RSROHES1 ***
no switchport
no ip address
no cdp enable
xconnect 10.193.32.42 5 pw-class backup-ypa-sro
On the 3900___________
pseudowire-class backup-sro-ypa
encapsulation mpls
interface GigabitEthernet0/1
description Tunnel_BB_HEIGVD
no ip address
duplex auto
speed auto
no keepalive
no cdp enable
xconnect 10.193.32.50 5 pw-class backup-sro-ypa
This time, impossible to get the tunnel UP :
sh xconnect all detail :
XC ST Segment 1                         S1 Segment 2                         S2
------+---------------------------------+--+---------------------------------+--
DN     ac   Gi0/1(Ethernet)              UP mpls 10.193.32.50:5               DN
            Interworking: none                   Local VC label 147
                                                 Remote VC label unassigned
                                                 pw-class: backup-sro-ypa
Actually, as I am in a CsC architecture using BGB for label distribution with the CsC core, there is not ldp neighbor, and it seems to be the reason why I can't get the tunnel UP.
I am now trying to avoid ldp for the signaling of the tunnel using AToM Static Pseudowire Provisioning but I am to much of a newbie for that. I get a "Incomplete AToM manual config" when configuring the xconnect on the me3600...
Here is my config on the ME3600x so far :
pseudowire-class backup-ypa-sro
encapsulation mpls
protocol none
interface GigabitEthernet0/2
description *** Backup L2 VLans Internes avec RSROHES1 ***
no switchport
no ip address
no cdp enable
xconnect 10.193.32.42 5 encapsulation mpls manual pw-class backup-ypa-sro
! Incomplete AToM manual config
Funny, I tried to configure
RYPRC01(config-if-xconn)#mpls label 0 1048500
on the xconnect sub config section of the interface, but it won't appear in the config...
I am really stuck, and any help would really be appreciated.
Best Regards,
Jérôme Schlumberger

Q-in-Q on an EVC/Service Instance

Hi
I want to take a bunch of VLANs from an interface, trunk them through my network, and spit them out on another end. Sounds like simple Q-in-Q to me.
Problem is one end is a 3600X, and the other is a 4900M. The 4900M is simple. The problem I have is with the 3600X and the EVC. Let's say I want to take VLAN 10 from a customer, and carry it on my network as VLAN 100. I will take them from a port on my 3600X and then carry VLAN 100 along with another bunch of unrelated VLANs through my network.
Can I configure a service instance on the customer facing port encapsulating their VLANs (let's say VLAN 10 for this example), then carry the internal VLAN (100) through on my trunks?
Example, 3600X:
interface GigabitEthernet0/1
description FACING CUSTOMER NETWORK
switchport trunk allowed vlan none
switchport mode trunk
service instance 1 ethernet
encapsulation dot1q 10
bridge-domain 100
interface GigabitEthernet0/2
description FACING SERVICE PROVIDER CLOUD
switchport trunk allowed vlan 100
switchport mode trunk
Then the 4900M will be:
interface GigabitEthernet0/1
description FACING CUSTOMER NETWORK
switchport access vlan 100
switchport mode dot1q-tunnel
interface GigabitEthernet0/2
description FACING SERVICE PROVIDER CLOUD
switchport trunk allowed vlan 100
switchport mode trunk
This doesn't work. I've tried various configs on the 3600 but can't get it working. I am not sure how to config the EVC properly - on the 3600X I suspect I also have to configure a service instance on the trunk facing into the cloud? This unfortunately isn't preferable as I want this to function as a basic, normal trunk (it has about 50 other VLANs on it).
Cheers for any help!

Not sure in 4900M, I would have to test it, but in ME switch, I believe you would have to push a tag because it seems you don't care about which VLAN it comes in.
So for example, your encapsulation would be anything.
service instance 1 ethernet
encapsulation dot1q 1 - 4094
rewrite ingress tag push dot1q 100 symmetric
This would push a second VLAN (100) in a tagged frame that reaches the port.
The symmetric would pop it when sending out of that interface so the inner VLAN would be kept.

Packet Capture on a EVC (service instance)

Hi all,
I am trying to capture packets on a ASR i have tried the monitor sess type command and specified the source vlan but there is no traffic capture.
Does anyone know how to do this?
Is it possible?
cheers
Kev

Hello Kev
You can do it via ERSPAN. you will get the CLI for the service instance in the XE 3.5 image due in november i guess...
Cheers!!!
Vinit

ME3400E: Unable to delete a service under ethernet cfm domain

Hello all,
With a ME3400E running IOS Version 12.2(55)SE4 sometimes when we try to remove a service we get an error:
EDD-1001111111(config)#ethernet cfm domain PT level 6
EDD-1001111111(config-ecfm)#no service 1000 vlan 100
An EVC is associated with this service. Remove all EVC's associated before removing the service. Command Aborted.
Only with a reboot we can remove the service.
Bug ? Order of operations ? Can anyone help me ?
Thanks !
David

Hi Manpreet,
Once you deleted the Business Service, it comes into your change list as it is one of the changes in your objects.
Now to confirm the delete operation just right click on your change list and click activate, and it will be permanently deleted.
Or if you just want to remove the service from your scenario then just right click on the service and select remove from the scenario and again activate your changes.
I hope it helps.....
Do get back for more doubts.
Thanks and Regards,
Varun Joshi
Message was edited by: Varun Joshi

Service instance command is not as documented

Hi,
I use Cisco 7609 with IOS 15.0(1)S1 and with ES+ module.
I try to configure a service instance, but the only possible commands I get are:
Router-1(config-if)#ser insta 22eth
Router-1(config-if-srv)#?
Ethernet EFP configuration commands:
default   Set a command to its defaults
ethernet Configure ether lmi parameters
exit      Exit from ETHER EFP configuration mode
no        Negate a command or set its defaults
I need the "encapsulation ... " command.
Could someone explain what is the problem? ES+ module supports EVC-style configuration and Cisco official documentation claims that the above mentioned command IS supported.
Thanks,
Yoav.

Hello Yoav
Yes indeed it should be supported .. Is it possible to try different IOS if it is a lab router
NPE-1(config-if)#ser in 10 ethernet
NPE-1(config-if-srv)#?
Ethernet EFP configuration commands:
default        Set a command to its defaults
description    Service instance specific description
encapsulation Configure ethernet frame match criteria
errdisable      Configure error disable
ethernet        ethernet
exit            Exit from ETHER EFP configuration mode
group          Join a service group
ip              Interface Internet Protocol config commands
l2protocol      Configure l2 control protocol processing
mac            Commands for MAC Address-based features
no              Negate a command or set its defaults
service-policy Attach a policy-map to an EFP
shutdown        Take the Service Instance out of Service
snmp            Modify SNMP service instance parameters
weight          Assign a weight to an EFP
NPE-1(config-if-srv)#
Regards
Sherif Ismail

ME 3800 X - QinQ across service instance

I realize a test rig of ME-3800-X.
I use the MPLS and QinQ.
EoMPLS for pseudowire is Ok in test rig.
QinQ also.
In fact, everything is ok.
But, in documentation, it is not said that we can forward the frame QinQ across a Service Instance.
Header:vlan+eth+data                     >>ingress 3800 -A >> evc bridge-domain 100 >>>>>> Vlan 100 and rewite imposition and Xconnect to B>>
                                      egress 3800 -A >> Eompls+QinQ+Vlan+eth+data >>>>
                                                                                                                   |
                                                                                                                   |
                                                                                                    BACKBONE MPLS
                                                                                                                   |
                                                                                                                   |
>>>ingress 3800- B >>>> Vlan 100 (not rewite) + xconnect to A >>>> evc bridge-domain 100 >>>>egress 3800 - B > Header QinQ+ETH+DATA
It has QinQ frames within the bridge domaine not frame Vlan.
Question:
Is what I can do this even if the documentation does not indicate.
Thanks for your comment.
I am french, sorry for my bad english language.
Cdlt,

Hello Cdlt.
but what is the question? Is it something like "how come that even if my configuration does not match the guide my setup is working?"
Is that one?
Also, does it work when your config is matching the EVC guide instead (the one in green on your pdf)?
Quick notation is that even if the configuration is not matching the guide the final result is the same as you moved the pop operation of the outmost dot1q tag from the ingress PE (the one on top) to egress one by configuring 'platform rewrite imposition tag push 1 symmetric' on the SVIs.
So you either strip the qinq tag on ingress or on egress the frame looks like the same way when the last mpls label is popped.
Does this answer to your question or am I still missing the point?
Riccardo

Service-name meaning in the service instance command

Hi,
in the Cisco 7600 we have the following command to configure a service instance:
service instance id ethernet [service-name]
Searching information for the meaning of the service-name option I didn't find nothing..
Do you know what service-name do and when (or why) it might be configured?
Often the service instance configuration is
service instance 100 ethernet without any service-name
thx
Riccardo

Hi,
Router(config-if-srv)#service instance id {Ethernet [service-name]}
Creates an service instance (instantiation of an EVC) on an interface. It sets the device into the config-if-srv sub-mode.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/routers/ps368/products_configuration_guide_chapter09186a00807f3f7e.html

Etherchannel Issues when i apply service-instance

I am trying to do etherchannel between two ports of ME3600 and two ports of Cisco Switch 3400 with either Pagp or LACP. If the ports are with a simple configuration (trunk ports) the etherchannel is up and running properly. But when i apply a simple service instance at port-channel at ME3600, the etherchannel doesnt work properly.
But when the etherchannel is configured with the MODE ON everything is Ok. Is it possible to do evc on port-channel (Pagp/Lacp)?
Thank you All,
Mery

try to remove all ur data not with a back up but manually by syncing your phone with your pc so in this step u can save only your contats and callender in outlook and your photos and videos in a folder
and then restore your iphone again
this can help you to do not backup your settings because maybe there's something wrong with it

Flexible QinQ/Service Awareness on 7600 12.2(33)SRB

Hi experts,
I have a scenario whereby the NPE core-facing links are using the 7600-ES20-10G3CXL with MPLS turned on. The UPE facing links are using the WS-X6724-SFP LAN modules. I would like to know in this kind of setup, is the flexible QinQ feature supported, if configured on the WS-X6724 interfaces?
For example:
Module 2 on the 7600 is a WS-X6724-SFP LAN module.
7600-NPE#conf t
Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z.
7600-NPE(config)#int g2/1
7600-NPE(config-if)#service instance 999 ?
ethernet Configure an Ethernet Instance
7600-NPE(config-if)#service instance 999 ethernet ?
WORD Attach an EVC to the service instance
<cr>
I understand the commands are there, but is this generally a supported feature? Or is the flexible QinQ only supported when a ES20/SIP-400 based card facing UPE is used?
Note: UPE is a 3750ME/ME3400 with 802.1Q trunk towards the 7600 NPE terminating on the WS-X6724.
Appreciate your thoughts on this.
Thanks in advance.

Hello,
The config seems to be valid from H-QoS point of view.
But as per Table 7-3, first row and Note1, on the following CCO link there are restrictions
from Classification side (class-maps) on ES+:
https://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/routers/7600/install_config/ES40_config_guide/es40_chap7.html#wp1337428
Like, for match ACLs only classify based on source MAC address using Layer 2 ACL
supported for L2-switchports, EVCs/Port-chan EVCs.
Deny ACL is not supported on ES+ linecards.
So if in your class maps classification is based on an ACLs trying to
match Layer3 (IPs) and/or Layer4 info, those classification options are not supported for ES+.
And you got those errors.
If such a case you would need a some kind of re-design, for example, to mark CoS fields on some downstream/access device,
and then on ES+ ingress l2 interface or EVCs use a class maps
which would just match on those DSCP/IP_Prec values.
Thanks,
Sergey

Error while calling a select esb service

javax.resource.ResourceException: RollbackException: Transaction has been marked for rollback:
I encounter the above error while executing a synchronous bpel process, that invokes an esb db select service to fetch a value from the db.
the details available for the error are:
An unhandled exception has been thrown in the ESB system. The exception reported is: "java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: Array index out of range: 0 at java.util.Vector.get(Vector.java:710) at oracle.tip.esb.server.common.wsif.WSIFInvoker.readResponseHeader(Unknown Source) at oracle.tip.esb.server.common.wsif.WSIFInvoker.executeOperation(Unknown Source) at oracle.tip.esb.server.common.wsif.WSIFInvoker.nextService(Unknown Source) at oracle.tip.esb.server.service.impl.outadapter.OutboundAdapterService.nextService(Unknown Source) at oracle.tip.esb.server.service.impl.outadapter.OutboundAdapterService.processBusinessEvent(Unknown Source) at oracle.tip.esb.server.dispatch.InitialEventDispatcher.dispatchNonRoutingService(Unknown Source) at oracle.tip.esb.server.dispatch.InitialEventDispatcher.dispatch(Unknown Source) at oracle.tip.esb.server.dispatch.BusinessEvent.raise(Unknown Source) at oracle.tip.esb.wsif.WSIFOperation_ESB.executeRequestResponseOperation(Unknown Source) at com.collaxa.cube.ws.WSIFInvocationHandler.invoke(WSIFInvocationHandler.java:431) at com.collaxa.cube.ws.WSInvocationManager.invoke2(WSInvocationManager.java:353) at com.collaxa.cube.ws.WSInvocationManager.invoke(WSInvocationManager.java:192) at com.collaxa.cube.engine.ext.wmp.BPELInvokeWMP.__invoke(BPELInvokeWMP.java:733) at com.collaxa.cube.engine.ext.wmp.BPELInvokeWMP.__executeStatements(BPELInvokeWMP.java:368) at com.collaxa.cube.engine.ext.wmp.BPELActivityWMP.perform(BPELActivityWMP.java:197) at com.collaxa.cube.engine.CubeEngine.performActivity(CubeEngine.java:3266) at com.collaxa.cube.engine.CubeEngine.handleWorkItem(CubeEngine.java:1696) at com.collaxa.cube.engine.dispatch.message.instance.PerformMessageHandler.handleLocal(PerformMessageHandler.java:75) at com.collaxa.cube.engine.dispatch.DispatchHelper.handleLocalMessage(DispatchHelper.java:184) at com.collaxa.cube.engine.dispatch.DispatchHelper.sendMemory(DispatchHelper.java:269) at com.collaxa.cube.engine.CubeE
Please suggest
thanx
AJ

Done That,
Thanx a ton Dave, it worked.
So I am finally moving on :-)
Just one question Dave, I happened to work on the Beta release of this version too, the problem was not there. How come we have been able to get it in dev preview.

Error while invoking a WS-Security secured web service from Oracle BPEL..

Hi ,
We are facing some error while invoking a WS-Security secured web service from our BPEL Process on the windows platform(SOA 10.1.3.3.0).
For the BPEL process we are following the same steps as given in an AMIS blog : - [http://technology.amis.nl/blog/1607/how-to-call-a-ws-security-secured-web-service-from-oracle-bpel]
but sttill,after deploying it and passing values in it,we are getting the following error on the console :-
“Header [http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2004/08/addressing:Action] for ultimate recipient is required but not present in the message”
Any pointers in this regard will be highly appreciated.
Thanks,
Saurabh

Hi James,
Thanks for the quick reply.
We've tried to call that web service from an HTML designed in Visual Studios with the same username and password and its working fine.
But on the BPEL console, we are getting the error as mentioned.
Also if you can tell me how to set the user name and password in the header of the parter link.I could not find how to do it.
Thanks,
Saurabh

Necessary Fields For Creation of Service PO of Order Type Relaese Order.

Dear Guru,
I have encountered an issue which i am trying to resolve...
My this requirment will seem little okward the way i am asking but i have no way...
The issue is I have to create a Service PO of Order type Release order (RO) using BAPI Function Module .BAPI_PO_CREATE1.
The service PO should be of multiple Item and services for particular line item should be multiple.
When I am creating this using ME21 or ME21N i am facing no issue.
But when i am using BAPI Function Module .BAPI_PO_CREATE1
i am getting following errors ;; The error which i am getting as below
T ID                   NUM MESSAGE
E BAPI                001 No instance of object type PurchaseOrder has been created. External reference:
E MEPO              000 Purchase order still contains faulty items
E SE                   029 Please maintain services or limits
E SE                   140 Service HIRING OF LCD: please specify unit of measure
But I am failing to findout in which field services or limits and unit of measurement have to maintain.
What are the necessary fields have to pass in Bapi import parameter and the table i am unable to findout.
Please show some way how to resolve this or give me some guideline to resolve this
Dear Moderator request your kind intervane to move this qurry into correct forum if i have asked this in wrong forum
Thanks and regards
saifur rahaman

Hi Saifur
Can you please elaborate how did you resolve the issue we are also facing same problem when we are trying to create the PO for service items through SRM it is throwing same error while creating the PO in SAP.
Email Id : [email protected]
Thank you in advance!!
Regards
Deepika

EVC no service, bridgedomain Service

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for