[EWM]-[BADI] /SCWM/ES_CORE_CONS (Define Consolidation Group)

Hi Experts,
I have implemented the BADI: /SCWM/ES_CORE_CONS and done some code incuding a break-point to modify the "Consolidation Group" in the module EWM but when I performed the flow transactions my BADI is not called (no Break Point raised).
Have you got some idea, please?
Best regards.
Rachid.

Hi Suddesh Soni,
Yes, I have done that but the Badi is never called. In fact, I have 2 systems communicating:
ECC ==>  EWM (Add-on).
When I end up the flow transactions, the ECC sends the data to the EWM (module) for updating data.
And the documentation specify that the BADI should be called to perform my need.
But the BADI is never called through CL_EXITHANDLER-GET INSTANCE( ).
Maybe not activated ?

Similar Messages

  • BCS 604 SP6 - Change to Consolidation Group extra features

    Hi All,
    We've upgraded from SP0 to SP6 and noticed some new options for CCG config:
    IN UCWB we have rthe following new options:
    1. under Consolidation area -->  Settings --> Consolidation Functions used, we have:
    (checkbox) Separation of Goodwill from Investment (ERP 2005)
    2. Under Changes to Consolidation group we had:
    - Selected Items
    - Task
    - Document Type
    - System Utilization - NEW
    > (checkbox) Other Comprehensive Income in Total Divestiture
    Help on "1" reveals:
    If you select this checkbox, you enable the separation of goodwill from the investment relationship.
    Use
    If the Separation of Goodwill from Investment function is active, you can manually enter a goodwill entry on a separate consolidation unit for the Reclassification of Treasury Stock activity. The system does not post a minority interest to effects from valuation allowance or currency translation. The system suppresses the posting of minority interests on the assumption that no investment and equity data exist for a separate consolidation unit for which you have entered a manual goodwill entry. (However, the system does not check whether investment and equity data on the separate consolidation unit really do not exist.)
    Help on "2":
    Other Comprehensive Income in Total Divestiture
    If you select this checkbox, you enable the system to post the other comprehensive income in the Total Divestiture activity with an effect on net income.
    Use
    If the Other Comprehensive Income in Total Divestiture function is active, the system posts the group value of the other comprehensive income in total divestiture to the income statement.
    Dependencies
    You define the items for other comprehensive income as a subset of the equity items in Equity Data Customizing on the Other Comprehensive Income tab page. You specify there for each item for other comprehensive income the relevant posting item in the income statement.
    Anyone used either of these extra features,
    found them useful, any problems?

    I have not used the 1st "Separation of Goodwill".
    The second feature is needed when Cons of Investment (COI) is not used. I actually configured Cons Grp Chgs with this and subsequently implemented COI in the same system. What happened is that this feature disappeared from Cons Grp Chgs and reappeared in COI > Settings > Appropriation of Retained Earnings.
    I hope this helps.

  • COI not reading equity data after consolidation group change

    Dear experts,
    I am running the consolidation of investments task for a new group that has been created on 012.2009. This new group CG2 is a child of an existing one CG1, and all the consolidation units that I have in 012.2009 under CG2 were in 012.2008 under the CG1.
    In my new group GC2 all the units have as first consolidation period 012.2009 and on the parent group they have as last consolidation period 012.2009.
    The problem is that when I run the COI task the system does not read the equity data for these consolidation units. I have both, equity data and Investment data defined to be read from additional financial data.  The system reads correctly the investment data for the parent consolidation unit, and tries to eliminate it, but as it does not read the equity data of the child so it takes the value to consolidation a difference, that is incorrect.
    Does anyone know what I am missing?
    Thanks in advance.
    Kind regards,
    Sónia

    Hi Sonia
    i dont want to confuse you as Dan is guiding so far. let me put my thoughts some here.
    CG1  12/2008
       - CU - A    Parent    12/2008 to 999/9999
       - CU- B                   12/2008  to 999/9999
       - CU - C                  12/2008 to 999/9999
    do you have any another sub node for CU-B and CU-C? as B has investment in C
    New Group: 12/2009
      CG1
       - CU -A    12/08 to 999/9999
       - CU - B    12/08 to 12/9999
       - CU - C     12/08 to 12/2009
       CG2 group supose to be like this
      CG1
        -CU-A
        -CU-B
           I---  CG2
                 CU - B   Parent  12/09  to 999/9999
                 CU - C                12/09 to 999/9999
         - CU-C 
    Now with above scenario you can invest in C from B and system will treate as FIRST CONSOLIDATION  based on AFD Investments/Equity
    How did you maintain B investments in C at CG1 12/08 level?
    and or    as per Dan
    You have to run PREP for CONSOLIDATION GROUP CHANGE  task  before CT task and after Elim Taks but before COI task
    thx

  • Consolidation Group - Partner Company

    Hi All,
    First of all I am not an FI person (BWer), so if you can give a slightly simpler answer it would be great.
    I am looking for information related to a field Consolidation Group- in one of the BW reports.
    I have checked the details and came to know that it is a masterdata field for Company and - in this report it is taking the
    same from the partner company (I beaileve it is related to partner functions - not very sure)
    Kindly share some inputs related to same, like what is the functionality expected out of this? In whcih screen I can check this out and which is the database table etc.
    Thanks
    Jith

    Hi Jith,
    The business object Consolidation group is a user-defined aggregation of multiple consolidation units for the purpose of consolidation and reporting thereon.
    You can find the consolidation mapping in CX1X, where you can define your naming consolidation group with the required company code assigned to it.
    Thank you,
    Ethiraj

  • New consolidation group with wrong values

    Hi all,
    We are working with SEM-BCS 6.0 and we are having an issue that we hope you can help us.
    At 012.2008 we have created a new consolidation group (N002) with the consolidation unit 0100.
    This consolidation unit (0100) also exists in consolidation group (H001) since 006.2008.
    The problem is that at 012.2008 when we use the posting logic u201Cstandardu201D the account values are correct in the consolidation group that used to exist (H001), but for the new consolidation group (N002) the account values are only the delta values.
    For example:
    011.2008
    Account 111000 = 50.000u20AC
    012.2008
    Account 111000= 60.000u20AC
    At 012.2008 in the consolidation group (H001) we have the 60.000u20AC but in the consolidation group N002 the account only has 10.000u20AC (delta)
    But if the new consolidation group (N002) only exists since 012.2008 and for the consolidation unit 0100 the first consolidation is defined as 012.2008 why is only being considered the delta (10.000u20AC) and not the all value (60.000u20AC)?
    Thanks for your help.
    Best regards

    We are using the cumulative type of data storing.
    Sorry, you can't. It's the system that always stores data periodically. You may just load data cumulatively.
    Regardless of type of your load data in the system is always kept periodically.
    > The reason for the appearance of this company in another group is only because they want to do a u201Csecondu201D consolidation considering a different group of companies by consolidation area.
    > That is, they want to consolidate both consolidation groups with the same companies but with them being considered differently by consolidation areas.
    > Is like the second consolidation group is a simulation.
    Sorry, Ricardo, I cannot read it in business terms. Different hierarchies, dif. ConsAreas, dif. groups... I do not see why and what for.

  • BCS - Divestiture  consolidation group change

    Is there a FM module that would tell me when a company was divested and what the new consolidation group would be?
    I'm not a BCS consultant.

    There may not be a FM for this.
    When you define the consolidation units and consolidation group in BCS in the context of consolidating investments and eliminating inter comoany diviidends.
    Even there, you may not get the date on which the disinvesment took place. Consolidation of investments will be carried on a "given day" on which the Balance sheet and BS are drawn.
    Ravi Thothadri

  • Consolidation Group Change and Consolidation Activity

    Hi Experts,
    I am new in SAP consolidation, I have a question regarding the difference between the function "consolidation group change" and "consolidation activity".
    If I read in the sap library, these 2 functions are separated, but if I look at the content, I saw some similarity where the consolidation group change also included the investment activity like acquisition and divestiture.
    Could anyone explain what are the difference between these 2 function?
    When I was a user, if the group acquiered a new cons unit, I just add a new cons unit in the consolidation group hierarchy, assign consolidation method, add the additional financial data for the ownership percentage (activity = first consolidation), enter the reported financial data, run CI function and add one more column in my report painter.
    When I read SAP library, I saw the "consolidation group change" function talking about the consolidation activity, now I wonder, what are the difference? What is the business scenario for using the "normal" CI activity and the "consolidation group change"? Please anyone advise. Thank you.
    regards,

    Normal C/I is a regular acquisition or divestiture.  Cons Group Change could be movement of a company from one consolidation group to another (i.e., parent A sells company 1 to parent B).  Or you own a company 20% and purchase an additional 60% and must switch accounting technique from Equity to Purchase.  BCS will need to book Cons Group Change entries to account for the acct technique change.  (In the past, at 20%, you would only book equity pickup, or equitization entries, to the parent as PL30 adjustments in the CoI.  Now you must bring in the complete balances of the company due to purchase method of consolidation.  BCS books consolidation-group specific adjustments to do this.)
    Example....
    "Normal C/I activity"
    New company A needs be consolidated in Cons Group 1 starting in 03/2007.  Add the company to the Cons Group master data, set the accounting technique, update additional financial data w/ activity First consolidation and load data for the new company.  Run COI
    "Cons Group Change"
    Company A is consolidated in Cons Group 1, but starting in 06/2007 they will be sold to a parent in Cons Group 2.  Update the Cons Group master data...setting company A to divest in 06/2007 from CG1 and to First Consolidate in CG2 starting in 06/2007.  If using Org Change logic, create an Org Change number and define a sender/receiver relationship for CG1 --> CG2.  In additional financial data, create a total transfer activity w/ org change logic from CG1 to CG2.  Run Org Change task and BCS will zero out balance sheet related to company A in CG1 on posting level 02/12/22.  In CG2, similar postings will book "catch up" entries in 06/2007 to bring full balance sheet into CG2.  In CoI, company will be transferred to new parent.
    Hopefully that makes sense...
    Chris

  • Purpose of defining account group?

    purpose of defining account group?

    Hi,
    Please read the rules of engagement before you post.
    <b>Step 1: Finding An Answer</b>
    Rule number one: Try to find the answer first. There are tons of resources out there, show that you have tried to find the answer. A question that shows that the person is willing to try and help themselves is more likely to be answered than one which simply demands information. Tell us what you have done to try and solve the problem yourself - often we can learn from that too!
    Search the forums, the articles, the blog posts and the Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) in the Wiki for your topic.

  • PL30 -Posting  Balancing issue for postings across consolidation groups

    Hi All
    Greeting for the Day
    We have implemented PL30 Upload for consolidation groups ,User is trying to post cross consolidation Groups  as per one sample file with fields in the order mentioned below
    100     2009     09                                                                 
    Cons Group/Doc type/C/i Activity/company/FS Item/movement type//investee company/Period value in GC
    GABCD     301     05     ABCD     11610C     125          IJKL     -500                                   
    GWXYZ     301     05     EFGH     60102C     125          EFGH     500
    now ABCD& EFGH belong to alotgether different consolidation groups GABCD & GWXYZ ,so while doing a flexi upload of the same system throws error
    as below
    Balance sheet/income statement balance 500,00 EUR
    Message no. UCD1011
    Diagnosis
    The document to be posted is not completely in balance.
    Entries involving items of the balance sheet or the income statement must always have a zero balance to ensure that both the balance sheet and the income statement are balanced, respectively. This is not true in this case.
    System Response
    Entry cannot be posted.
    Procedure
    Correct the amounts for the balance sheet items and/or income statement items.
    So our understanding of the same is that for this kind of entry to balance at Legal entity level we need to have an offsetting account entry created on the flexi upload file
    But want to know if there is any automatic way of doing the same without making users enter an offsetting entry
    ANy other suggestions are welcome as well as there are lot of manual postings at this time which are time consuming so we want to cut it down by using Flexi upload
    Rgds
    Dheeraj

    We have agreed with client on getting an offsetting account posting in the Flexi upload file
    as nothing else works as it was against the accounting bit
    Rgds
    Dheeraj

  • Customer fields do not display in Define Field Groups for Cust. Fields IMG

    I am customizing to display cusotmer fields in cporjects IMG actviity 'Define Field Groups for Customer Fields'.
    I am able to see the main tab in object category and multiple sub tabs in it. However customer fields that have been added by Enhance database tables in DPO are not shown or visible in the sub tabs.
    Am I missing any config? Please let me know.
    Senthil

    Hi Senthil,
    If you can see the tabs and not the fields, pl check if you have covered field control for these newly created custom fields.
    To have field control for these fields, you will have to copy the standard SAP provided field control, include the structure that has you custom fields and give it authorizations etc as per your requirement.
    Pl read carefully the documentation provided with field control.
    Refer note 947963 - Setting up field control
    Regards,
    Reema.

  • SEM-BCS Preparation for Consolidation Group Changes

    Hi All,
    Is the task "Preparation for Consolidation Group Changes" only implemented when Consolidation of Investments has also been implemented?
    Does "Preparation for Consolidation Group Changes" have any value on its own?
    Any comments, replies or suggestions most welcome.

    Hi,
    I think that prep for cons group changes is independent (but supplementary to) from CoI.
    See what is said in help:
    "When in the middle of a fiscal year a consolidation unit is either acquired by a consolidation group (acquisition), divested from a consolidation group (divestiture), or <b>changes its accounting technique</b> (method change), the following data must be adjusted:
    - Reported financial data
    - Standardized financial data
    - Consolidated data with posting level 20"
    As you can see, not only consolidated data are to be changed, but also Standardized and Reported.
    Moreover, as is seen above, changes of accounting technique will also trigger such activities.
    So, my answers:
    1. No
    2. Yes.
    Best regards,
    Eugene

  • Consolidation group change: Balance sheet/income statement balance 14,560

    Dear All,
    While performing the consolidation group change task, system throws the error message :
    Balance sheet/income statement balance 14,560,497.62- INR
    Message no. UCD1011
    Diagnosis
    The document to be posted is not completely in balance.
    Entries involving items of the balance sheet or the income statement must always have a zero balance to ensure that both the balance sheet and the income statement are balanced, respectively. This is not true in this case.
    System Response
    Entry cannot be posted.
    Procedure
    Correct the amounts for the balance sheet items and/or income statement items.
    I have checked the COI Settings and not showing any error.
    I have analysed the problem and found that system is not picking one FS item 107501 i.e Profit and Loss CY.
    Can any one suggest me how to resolve this.
    Thanks in advance.
    G Vinod

    Hi DAN,
    i ll elaborate what i wanted to convey.
    When we upload
    1. TB Equal to ZERO
    2. Net of BS items may not be equal to ZERO
    Eg: if September 2010 (FY is April to Mar) file is being uploaded, the profit till the period September will be in PL items. so to the extent of profit element will be the difference in BS Items.
    when u run profit calculation task, after data upload and validation, system will pass the following entry,
    In case of Loss:
    BS - Profit and loss - CY  -           Dr
    PL-  Profit  before MI         -          Cr
    BS- BS Clearing A/c                     Cr
    PL - PL Clearing  A/c                    Dr
    when u run PCC, system ll pick these two items *BS - Profit and loss - CY and BS- BS Clearing A/c. so obviously, posting cannot be done.
    Please tell me if u still not understand
    Thanks and Regards,
    G Vinod

  • Badi: for user defined fields in Budget Entry Document

    HI,
    I am implmenting BADI for user defined field in budget entry document definatin name 'FMBW_CUSTOMER' . I have created two fields in include 'CI_FMBH' and also created a sub screen and assign this subscreen to badi. I have called get data and put data methods in PBO and PAI. like this.
    <b>
    PBO
    create object grid1.
      CALL METHOD grid1->if_ex_fmbw_customer~get_data_from_screen
      importing doc_header = doc_header.</b>
    <b>PAI
      CALL METHOD grid1->if_ex_fmbw_customer~put_data_to_screen
        EXPORTING
          doc_header = doc_header
          processing_mode = 'CRE'.</b>
    But the system is not saving these fields in database.
    What could be the problem .

    Hi, did you have any advance on this issue?

  • Consolidation group Hierarchy - rollup calculation issue?

    Hi,
    I am facing an issue with my consolidation groups hierarchy (created in SEM BCS).
    We have a new conso group hierarchy starting for our plans 2010 : we have new nodes (zones), new leaves (new Business units) and some BUs moved fom one node to another one.
    Level 1 ZONE
            Level 2  BUSINESS UNIT
    (simplified hierarchy since we have sub-zones)
    in a Bex report, I fixed this new consolidation group hierarchy in selection (in filters) (to be able to select the new zones, the new Business units etc.)
    I can only get figures for one version and one fiscal year/period with this report.
    Results :
    -When i call a new Business unit, i get the correct figures, but when i call its higher level (the zone), the figures of this new Business unit are not included.
    -If i call a new zone, i don't see the proper figures with the sum of its BUs  + elimination between the BUs of the zone : i just see the eliminations between its BUs.
    I checked the master data synchronization between BCS and BW and everything looks fine.
    Has anyone had the same issue? Is there any solution?
    Many thanks in advance
    Armelle

    error on the version.
    Version not specificed in the ABAP code used for the exit

  • Defining Multiple Groups in PDF template

    Hi,
    I am having trouble defining multiple groups in my pdf template. I would like to set up multiple groups for printing po data such as (G_LINES, G_SHIPMENTS, etc.) How is this done in Acrobat? I am using 7.0 Professional. I have created BODY START and BODY END text fields and inserted the <?rep_field="BODY_START"?> and <?rep_field="BODY_END"?> syntax into the Tooltip area as instructed in the user's guide. I have entered the <?rep_field="T1_G1"?> syntax for each element in my lines group. This works fine. But, how do I set up the group for the shipment information?
    Thanks!

    Put all the fields inside the innermost for-each loop.
    You can be better helped with such questions in the specialized BI Publisher forum:
    BI Publisher

Maybe you are looking for