Exception Handling inside a Multi-Instance Loop

I would like to see a sample process that demonstrates Exception Handling inside an inline subprocess containing another subprocess with a multi-instance sub-process in parallel. The outer sub-process is executing in sequence. Each instance of the outer loop depends upon the outcome of the successful execution of previous step. At each step, the inner inline sub-process activity can have more than one instance which are all executed in parallel using multi-instance. If the outcome code of any one of these parallel instances is "REJECT" code, we simply raise a business exception and the stop the outer sub-process from going through the next instance of the loop. The problem we are trying to solve is similar to the sample in chapter 5 of the book "New Book: Oracle BPM Suite 11g: Advanced BPMN Topics" by Mark Nelson. Particularly, the exception handling example shown in Page 73 under the topic “Exception Handling with embedded Sub-processes”. The inner most multi-instance sub-process should raise a business exception and interrupt the .
We would like to see a smple that demonstrates how exceptions are handled inside a multi-instance parallel sub-process. Could someone please provide a working sample that we can go though? We would like to raise a business exception as soon as certain outcome of a Human Tasks in observed and break out of the loop and continue thereafter. Thanks very much in advance for your help.
Pankaj
Edited by: 1001027 on 2-May-2013 10:09 AM

I would like to see a sample process that demonstrates Exception Handling inside an inline subprocess containing another subprocess with a multi-instance sub-process in parallel. The outer sub-process is executing in sequence. Each instance of the outer loop depends upon the outcome of the successful execution of previous step. At each step, the inner inline sub-process activity can have more than one instance which are all executed in parallel using multi-instance. If the outcome code of any one of these parallel instances is "REJECT" code, we simply raise a business exception and the stop the outer sub-process from going through the next instance of the loop. The problem we are trying to solve is similar to the sample in chapter 5 of the book "New Book: Oracle BPM Suite 11g: Advanced BPMN Topics" by Mark Nelson. Particularly, the exception handling example shown in Page 73 under the topic “Exception Handling with embedded Sub-processes”. The inner most multi-instance sub-process should raise a business exception and interrupt the .
We would like to see a smple that demonstrates how exceptions are handled inside a multi-instance parallel sub-process. Could someone please provide a working sample that we can go though? We would like to raise a business exception as soon as certain outcome of a Human Tasks in observed and break out of the loop and continue thereafter. Thanks very much in advance for your help.
Pankaj
Edited by: 1001027 on 2-May-2013 10:09 AM

Similar Messages

  • Is Modeling Multi-Instance Loops of Activities available in CE 7.1?

    Hi,
    I just want to know if Modeling Multi-Instance Loops of Activities available in CE 7.1. Because I dont see the property for Looping in my version CE 7.1

    No, the parallel looping capability is only added with SAP NetWeaver Composition Environment 7.2.

  • Modeling Multi-Instance Loops of Activities?

    Hi,
    in the help for BPM 7.20 it says
    "When you use the Parallel For Each loop option, the following additional loop-specific data objects are automatically created:
    numberOfCompletedIterations
    This data object contains the number of completed loop instances.
    currentCollectionItem
    This data object contains the list element assigned to each loop instance."
    However, when I select the Parallel For Each option, I do not see the aforementioned data objects. Please assist.
    Thanks.

    Solved by adding an expression.

  • Exception Handling of Screenflows inside Processes

    Greetings,
    We are currently encountering a problem where some unhandled Exceptions are not being caught in our BPM application.
    Whenever an exception occurs inside a process, BPM has provided a way of handling those exceptions by using the “Process Exception” activity (this looks like a small lightning bolt). All errors that are not caught but are of the compatible type would fall into this activity and get processed.
    The problem arises when your process has a Global Activity Interactive Screenflow. Whenever this screenflow encounters an error inside its flow, it does not get caught by the “Process Exception” activity even though this process was the one that invoked it.
    We can try to make some exception handling per automatic activity inside the Screenflow itself but this usually results in large try-catch statements and multiple connections to custom defined exception activities. This may not be the optimal solution to this.
    Would anyone be able to shed some light on this or offer some best practices on how to resolve these issues?
    Thank you very much!
    Oracle BPM Suite 10.3.2

    Wish I had a better answer for you. Telling you something that you already know, but if you've defined the Global's property with "Has instance access" then you can catch the exceptions in the process.
    Undoubtedly though, you've got a standalone Global or you would not be asking the question. The exception from a Global that does not have instance access can't get caught in the process because there was never an instance created for it inside the process.

  • Exception handling in stored process, loop IF..ELSE

    Hello Guys,
    we want to put in exception handling in the loop but get the following error:
    Error(43,3): PLS-00103: Encountered the symbol "EXCEPTION" when expecting one of the following: begin case declare end exit for goto if loop mod null pragma raise return select update while with <an identifier> <a double-quoted delimited-identifier> <a bind variable> << close current delete fetch lock insert open rollback savepoint set sql execute commit forall merge pipe
    create or replace
    PROCEDURE xxxx
    FOR MESSSY IN
    select I.*
    FROM x I
    LOOP
    IF upper(CODE)='N' THEN
    INSERT INTO T_MESS(MP)
    select I.MP_ID
    FROM T_ME
    ELSIF upper(MESSSY.k2)='L' THEN
    DELETE T_MESS WHERE T_MESS.MP = MESSSY.MP;
    END IF;
    EXCEPTION
    WHEN DUP_VAL_ON_INDEX THEN
    A program attempted to insert duplicate values in a column that is constrained by a unique index.
    DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE ('A program attempted to insert duplicate values in a column that is constrained by a unique index.')
    --No Rollback
    END;
    COMMIT;
    END LOOP;
    END xxxx;
    does someone know why?

    BluShadow wrote:
    Well, your code is missing all sorts of bits and we don't have your data or your exact logic to know what it's supposed to be achieving.
    That is right, you dont have my data and that is why I was suprised by your comment.
    Since the input table might contain a few thousand rows and each of those might need to
    be considered N , D, or C and each case has a different handling I can not imagine how this
    can be all done with a merge statement.
    MERGE
    T_METRICPOINT_META with T_METRICSSYSTEM_LOAD where T_METRICSSYSTEM_LOAD .LOAD_DATE=to_char(sysdate)
    WHEN MATCHED THEN --we know those are the metric points that have to be loaded today, but we still need to do a IF..ELSE to handle them
    WHEN NOT MATCHED THEN -- not considered in todays load
    ----original code-----
    create or replace
    PROCEDURE myprocedure AS
    BEGIN
    --Extracting the records from T_METRICSSYSTEM_LOAD which have todays load date. Corresponding to these MP_System, we extract the MP_IDs from the T_METRICPOINT_META table.
    --Comapring these MP_IDs with the MP_IDs from the source(T_METRICPOINT_IMPORT) and extracting only those Metric points which need to be loaded today.
    FOR METRICSSYSTEM IN
    select I.*
    FROM T_METRICPOINT_IMPORT I
    where I.LOADDATE = TO_CHAR(SYSDATE) AND I.MP_ID IN
    (select a.MP_ID
    from T_METRICPOINT_META a INNER JOIN T_METRICSSYSTEM_LOAD b on a.MP_SYSTEM = b.MP_SYSTEM where b.LOAD_DATE=to_char(sysdate))
    LOOP
    --If mutation code in the source/import data is "N", the record is inserted as it is in the "T_METRICPOINTS" table.
    IF upper(METRICSSYSTEM.MUTATIONCODE)='N' THEN --new
    INSERT INTO T_METRICPOINTS(MP_ID, ......)
    SELECT DISTINCT I.MP_ID,.....
    FROM T_METRICPOINT_IMPORT I WHERE I.MP_ID = METRICSSYSTEM.MP_ID
    ELSIF upper(METRICSSYSTEM.MUTATIONCODE)='D' THEN --delete
    DELETE T_METRICPOINTS WHERE T_METRICPOINTS.MP_ID = METRICSSYSTEM.MP_ID AND T_METRICPOINTS.KEY = METRICSSYSTEM.KEY;
    ELSIF upper(METRICSSYSTEM.MUTATIONCODE)='C' THEN --correction
    UPDATE T_HISTORYMETRICPOINTS H
    SET CHANGE_DATE = to_char(sysdate)
    WHERE H.MP_ID=METRICSSYSTEM.MP_ID AND H.KEY = METRICSSYSTEM.KEY;
    INSERT INTO T_HISTORYMETRICPOINTS(MP_ID, KEY, .....)
    --The distinct here is used, to handle 2 identical records in the input table with correction value "C". This would insert into 1 record in the T_HISTORYMETRICPOINTS table without
    --violating the primary key constraint.
    select DISTINCT I.MP_ID,I.KEY, ....
    FROM T_METRICPOINT_IMPORT I WHERE I.MP_ID = METRICSSYSTEM.MP_ID
    --END IF;
    END IF;
    COMMIT;
    END LOOP;
    END myprocedure;

  • PL/SQL 101 : Exception Handling

    Frequently I see questions and issues around the use of Exception/Error Handling in PL/SQL.  More often than not the issue comes from the questioners misunderstanding about how PL/SQL is constructed and executed, so I thought I'd write a small article covering the key concepts to give a clear picture of how it all hangs together. (Note: the examples are just showing examples of the exception handling structure, and should not be taken as truly valid code for ways of handling things)
    Exception Handling
    Contents
    1. Understanding Execution Blocks (part 1)
    2. Execution of the Execution Block
    3. Exceptions
    4. Understanding Execution Blocks (part 2)
    5. How to continue exection of statements after an exception
    6. User defined exceptions
    7. Line number of exception
    8. Exceptions within code within the exception block
    1. Understanding Execution Blocks (part 1)
    The first thing that one needs to understand is almost taking us back to the basics of PL/SQL... how a PL/SQL execution block is constructed.
    Essentially an execution block is made of 3 sections...
    +---------------------------+
    |    Declaration Section    |
    +---------------------------+
    |    Statements  Section    |
    +---------------------------+
    |     Exception Section     |
    +---------------------------+
    The Declaration section is the part defined between the PROCEDURE/FUNCTION header or the DECLARE keyword (for anonymous blocks) and the BEGIN keyword.  (Optional section)
    The Statements section is where your code goes and lies between the BEGIN keyword and the EXCEPTION keyword (or END keyword if there is no EXCEPTION section).  (Mandatory section)
    The Exception section is where any exception handling goes and lies between the EXCEPTION keyword at the END keyword. (Optional section)
    Example of an anonymous block...
    DECLARE
      .. declarative statements go here ..
    BEGIN
      .. code statements go here ..
    EXCEPTION
      .. exception handlers go here ..
    END;
    Example of a procedure/function block...
    [CREATE OR REPLACE] (PROCEDURE|FUNCTION) <proc or fn name> [(<parameters>)] [RETURN <datatype>] (IS|AS)
      .. declarative statements go here ..
    BEGIN
      .. code statements go here ..
    EXCEPTION
      .. exception handlers go here ..
    END;
    (Note: The same can also be done for packages, but let's keep it simple)
    2. Execution of the Execution Block
    This may seem a simple concept, but it's surprising how many people have issues showing they haven't grasped it.  When an Execution block is entered, the declaration section is processed, creating a scope of variables, types , cursors, etc. to be visible to the execution block and then execution enters into the Statements section.  Each statment in the statements section is executed in turn and when the execution completes the last statment the execution block is exited back to whatever called it.
    3. Exceptions
    Exceptions generally happen during the execution of statements in the Statements section.  When an exception happens the execution of statements jumps immediately into the exception section.  In this section we can specify what exceptions we wish to 'capture' or 'trap' and do one of the two following things...
    (Note: The exception section still has access to all the declared items in the declaration section)
    3.i) Handle the exception
    We do this when we recognise what the exception is (most likely it's something we expect to happen) and we have a means of dealing with it so that our application can continue on.
    Example...
    (without the exception handler the exception is passed back to the calling code, in this case SQL*Plus)
    SQL> ed
    Wrote file afiedt.buf
      1  declare
      2    v_name VARCHAR2(20);
      3  begin
      4    select ename
      5    into   v_name
      6    from   emp
      7    where  empno = &empno;
      8    dbms_output.put_line(v_name);
      9* end;
    SQL> /
    Enter value for empno: 123
    old   7:   where  empno = &empno;
    new   7:   where  empno = 123;
    declare
    ERROR at line 1:
    ORA-01403: no data found
    ORA-06512: at line 4
    (with an exception handler, we capture the exception, handle it how we want to, and the calling code is happy that there is no error for it to report)
    SQL> ed
    Wrote file afiedt.buf
      1  declare
      2    v_name VARCHAR2(20);
      3  begin
      4    select ename
      5    into   v_name
      6    from   emp
      7    where  empno = &empno;
      8    dbms_output.put_line(v_name);
      9  exception
    10    when no_data_found then
    11      dbms_output.put_line('There is no employee with this employee number.');
    12* end;
    SQL> /
    Enter value for empno: 123
    old   7:   where  empno = &empno;
    new   7:   where  empno = 123;
    There is no employee with this employee number.
    PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
    3.ii) Raise the exception
    We do this when:-
    a) we recognise the exception, handle it but still want to let the calling code know that it happened
    b) we recognise the exception, wish to log it happened and then let the calling code deal with it
    c) we don't recognise the exception and we want the calling code to deal with it
    Example of b)
    SQL> ed
    Wrote file afiedt.buf
      1  declare
      2    v_name VARCHAR2(20);
      3    v_empno NUMBER := &empno;
      4  begin
      5    select ename
      6    into   v_name
      7    from   emp
      8    where  empno = v_empno;
      9    dbms_output.put_line(v_name);
    10  EXCEPTION
    11    WHEN no_data_found THEN
    12      INSERT INTO sql_errors (txt)
    13      VALUES ('Search for '||v_empno||' failed.');
    14      COMMIT;
    15      RAISE;
    16* end;
    SQL> /
    Enter value for empno: 123
    old   3:   v_empno NUMBER := &empno;
    new   3:   v_empno NUMBER := 123;
    declare
    ERROR at line 1:
    ORA-01403: no data found
    ORA-06512: at line 15
    SQL> select * from sql_errors;
    TXT
    Search for 123 failed.
    SQL>
    Example of c)
    SQL> ed
    Wrote file afiedt.buf
      1  declare
      2    v_name VARCHAR2(20);
      3    v_empno NUMBER := &empno;
      4  begin
      5    select ename
      6    into   v_name
      7    from   emp
      8    where  empno = v_empno;
      9    dbms_output.put_line(v_name);
    10  EXCEPTION
    11    WHEN no_data_found THEN
    12      INSERT INTO sql_errors (txt)
    13      VALUES ('Search for '||v_empno||' failed.');
    14      COMMIT;
    15      RAISE;
    16    WHEN others THEN
    17      RAISE;
    18* end;
    SQL> /
    Enter value for empno: 'ABC'
    old   3:   v_empno NUMBER := &empno;
    new   3:   v_empno NUMBER := 'ABC';
    declare
    ERROR at line 1:
    ORA-06502: PL/SQL: numeric or value error: character to number conversion error
    ORA-06512: at line 3
    SQL> select * from sql_errors;
    TXT
    Search for 123 failed.
    SQL>
    As you can see from the sql_errors log table, no log was written so the WHEN others exception was the exception that raised the error to the calling code (SQL*Plus)
    4. Understanding Execution Blocks (part 2)
    Ok, so now we understand the very basics of an execution block and what happens when an exception happens.  Let's take it a step further...
    Execution blocks are not just a single simple block in most cases.  Often, during our statements section we have a need to call some reusable code and we do that by calling a procedure or function.  Effectively this nests the procedure or function's code as another execution block within the current statement section so, in terms of execution, we end up with something like...
    +---------------------------------+
    |    Declaration Section          |
    +---------------------------------+
    |    Statements  Section          |
    |            .                    |
    |  +---------------------------+  |
    |  |    Declaration Section    |  |
    |  +---------------------------+  |
    |  |    Statements  Section    |  |
    |  +---------------------------+  |
    |  |     Exception Section     |  |
    |  +---------------------------+  |
    |            .                    |
    +---------------------------------+
    |     Exception Section           |
    +---------------------------------+
    Example... (Note: log_trace just writes some text to a table for tracing)
    SQL> create or replace procedure a as
      2    v_dummy NUMBER := log_trace('Procedure A''s Declaration Section');
      3  begin
      4    v_dummy := log_trace('Procedure A''s Statement Section');
      5    v_dummy := 1/0; -- cause an exception
      6  exception
      7    when others then
      8      v_dummy := log_trace('Procedure A''s Exception Section');
      9      raise;
    10  end;
    11  /
    Procedure created.
    SQL> create or replace procedure b as
      2    v_dummy NUMBER := log_trace('Procedure B''s Declaration Section');
      3  begin
      4    v_dummy := log_trace('Procedure B''s Statement Section');
      5    a; -- HERE the execution passes to the declare/statement/exception sections of A
      6  exception
      7    when others then
      8      v_dummy := log_trace('Procedure B''s Exception Section');
      9      raise;
    10  end;
    11  /
    Procedure created.
    SQL> exec b;
    BEGIN b; END;
    ERROR at line 1:
    ORA-01476: divisor is equal to zero
    ORA-06512: at "SCOTT.B", line 9
    ORA-06512: at line 1
    SQL> select * from code_trace;
    TXT
    Procedure B's Declaration Section
    Procedure B's Statement Section
    Procedure A's Declaration Section
    Procedure A's Statement Section
    Procedure A's Exception Section
    Procedure B's Exception Section
    6 rows selected.
    SQL>
    Likewise, execution blocks can be nested deeper and deeper.
    5. How to continue exection of statements after an exception
    One of the common questions asked is how to return execution to the statement after the one that created the exception and continue on.
    Well, firstly, you can only do this for statements you expect to raise an exception, such as when you want to check if there is no data found in a query.
    If you consider what's been shown above you could put any statement you expect to cause an exception inside it's own procedure or function with it's own exception section to handle the exception without raising it back to the calling code.  However, the nature of procedures and functions is really to provide a means of re-using code, so if it's a statement you only use once it seems a little silly to go creating individual procedures for these.
    Instead, you nest execution blocks directly, to give the same result as shown in the diagram at the start of part 4 of this article.
    SQL> ed
    Wrote file afiedt.buf
      1  create or replace procedure b (p_empno IN VARCHAR2) as
      2    v_dummy NUMBER := log_trace('Procedure B''s Declaration Section');
      3  begin
      4    v_dummy := log_trace('Procedure B''s Statement Section');
      5    -- Here we start another execution block nested in the first one...
      6    declare
      7      v_dummy NUMBER := log_trace('Nested Block Declaration Section');
      8    begin
      9      v_dummy := log_trace('Nested Block Statement Section');
    10      select empno
    11        into   v_dummy
    12        from   emp
    13       where  empno = p_empno; -- Note: the parameters and variables from
                                         parent execution block are available to use!
    14    exception
    15      when no_data_found then
    16        -- This is an exception we can handle so we don't raise it
    17        v_dummy := log_trace('No employee was found');
    18        v_dummy := log_trace('Nested Block Exception Section - Exception Handled');
    19      when others then
    20        -- Other exceptions we can't handle so we raise them
    21        v_dummy := log_trace('Nested Block Exception Section - Exception Raised');
    22        raise;
    23    end;
    24    -- ...Here endeth the nested execution block
    25    -- As the nested block handled it's exception we come back to here...
    26    v_dummy := log_trace('Procedure B''s Statement Section Continued');
    27  exception
    28    when others then
    29      -- We'll only get to here if an unhandled exception was raised
    30      -- either in the nested block or in procedure b's statement section
    31      v_dummy := log_trace('Procedure B''s Exception Section');
    32      raise;
    33* end;
    SQL> /
    Procedure created.
    SQL> exec b(123);
    PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
    SQL> select * from code_trace;
    TXT
    Procedure B's Declaration Section
    Procedure B's Statement Section
    Nested Block Declaration Section
    Nested Block Statement Section
    No employee was found
    Nested Block Exception Section - Exception Handled
    Procedure B's Statement Section Continued
    7 rows selected.
    SQL> truncate table code_trace;
    Table truncated.
    SQL> exec b('ABC');
    BEGIN b('ABC'); END;
    ERROR at line 1:
    ORA-01722: invalid number
    ORA-06512: at "SCOTT.B", line 32
    ORA-06512: at line 1
    SQL> select * from code_trace;
    TXT
    Procedure B's Declaration Section
    Procedure B's Statement Section
    Nested Block Declaration Section
    Nested Block Statement Section
    Nested Block Exception Section - Exception Raised
    Procedure B's Exception Section
    6 rows selected.
    SQL>
    You can see from this that, very simply, the code that we expected may have an exception was able to either handle the exception and return to the outer execution block to continue execution, or if an unexpected exception occurred then it was able to be raised up to the outer exception section.
    6. User defined exceptions
    There are three sorts of 'User Defined' exceptions.  There are logical situations (e.g. business logic) where, for example, certain criteria are not met to complete a task, and there are existing Oracle errors that you wish to give a name to in order to capture them in the exception section.  The third is raising your own exception messages with our own exception numbers.  Let's look at the first one...
    Let's say I have tables which detail stock availablility and reorder levels...
    SQL> select * from reorder_level;
       ITEM_ID STOCK_LEVEL
             1          20
             2          20
             3          10
             4           2
             5           2
    SQL> select * from stock;
       ITEM_ID ITEM_DESC  STOCK_LEVEL
             1 Pencils             10
             2 Pens                 2
             3 Notepads            25
             4 Stapler              5
             5 Hole Punch           3
    SQL>
    Now, our Business has told the administrative clerk to check stock levels and re-order anything that is below the re-order level, but not to hold stock of more than 4 times the re-order level for any particular item.  As an IT department we've been asked to put together an application that will automatically produce the re-order documents upon the clerks request and, because our company is so tight-ar*ed about money, they don't want to waste any paper with incorrect printouts so we have to ensure the clerk can't order things they shouldn't.
    SQL> ed
    Wrote file afiedt.buf
      1  create or replace procedure re_order(p_item_id NUMBER, p_quantity NUMBER) is
      2    cursor cur_stock_reorder is
      3      select s.stock_level
      4            ,r.stock_level as reorder_level
      5            ,(r.stock_level*4) as reorder_limit
      6      from stock s join reorder_level r on (s.item_id = r.item_id)
      7      where s.item_id = p_item_id;
      8    --
      9    v_stock cur_stock_reorder%ROWTYPE;
    10  begin
    11    OPEN cur_stock_reorder;
    12    FETCH cur_stock_reorder INTO v_stock;
    13    IF cur_stock_reorder%NOTFOUND THEN
    14      RAISE no_data_found;
    15    END IF;
    16    CLOSE cur_stock_reorder;
    17    --
    18    IF v_stock.stock_level >= v_stock.reorder_level THEN
    19      -- Stock is not low enough to warrant an order
    20      DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('Stock has not reached re-order level yet!');
    21    ELSE
    22      IF v_stock.stock_level + p_quantity > v_stock.reorder_limit THEN
    23        -- Required amount is over-ordering
    24        DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('Quantity specified is too much.  Max for this item: '
                                     ||to_char(v_stock.reorder_limit-v_stock.stock_level));
    25      ELSE
    26        DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('Order OK.  Printing Order...');
    27        -- Here goes our code to print the order
    28      END IF;
    29    END IF;
    30    --
    31  exception
    32    WHEN no_data_found THEN
    33      CLOSE cur_stock_reorder;
    34      DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('Invalid Item ID.');
    35* end;
    SQL> /
    Procedure created.
    SQL> exec re_order(10,100);
    Invalid Item ID.
    PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
    SQL> exec re_order(3,40);
    Stock has not reached re-order level yet!
    PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
    SQL> exec re_order(1,100);
    Quantity specified is too much.  Max for this item: 70
    PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
    SQL> exec re_order(2,50);
    Order OK.  Printing Order...
    PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
    SQL>
    Ok, so that code works, but it's a bit messy with all those nested IF statements. Is there a cleaner way perhaps?  Wouldn't it be nice if we could set up our own exceptions...
    SQL> ed
    Wrote file afiedt.buf
      1  create or replace procedure re_order(p_item_id NUMBER, p_quantity NUMBER) is
      2    cursor cur_stock_reorder is
      3      select s.stock_level
      4            ,r.stock_level as reorder_level
      5            ,(r.stock_level*4) as reorder_limit
      6      from stock s join reorder_level r on (s.item_id = r.item_id)
      7      where s.item_id = p_item_id;
      8    --
      9    v_stock cur_stock_reorder%ROWTYPE;
    10    --
    11    -- Let's declare our own exceptions for business logic...
    12    exc_not_warranted EXCEPTION;
    13    exc_too_much      EXCEPTION;
    14  begin
    15    OPEN cur_stock_reorder;
    16    FETCH cur_stock_reorder INTO v_stock;
    17    IF cur_stock_reorder%NOTFOUND THEN
    18      RAISE no_data_found;
    19    END IF;
    20    CLOSE cur_stock_reorder;
    21    --
    22    IF v_stock.stock_level >= v_stock.reorder_level THEN
    23      -- Stock is not low enough to warrant an order
    24      RAISE exc_not_warranted;
    25    END IF;
    26    --
    27    IF v_stock.stock_level + p_quantity > v_stock.reorder_limit THEN
    28      -- Required amount is over-ordering
    29      RAISE exc_too_much;
    30    END IF;
    31    --
    32    DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('Order OK.  Printing Order...');
    33    -- Here goes our code to print the order
    34    --
    35  exception
    36    WHEN no_data_found THEN
    37      CLOSE cur_stock_reorder;
    38      DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('Invalid Item ID.');
    39    WHEN exc_not_warranted THEN
    40      DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('Stock has not reached re-order level yet!');
    41    WHEN exc_too_much THEN
    42      DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('Quantity specified is too much.  Max for this item: '
                                  ||to_char(v_stock.reorder_limit-v_stock.stock_level));
    43* end;
    SQL> /
    Procedure created.
    SQL> exec re_order(10,100);
    Invalid Item ID.
    PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
    SQL> exec re_order(3,40);
    Stock has not reached re-order level yet!
    PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
    SQL> exec re_order(1,100);
    Quantity specified is too much.  Max for this item: 70
    PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
    SQL> exec re_order(2,50);
    Order OK.  Printing Order...
    PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
    SQL>
    That's better.  And now we don't have to use all those nested IF statements and worry about it accidently getting to code that will print the order out as, once one of our user defined exceptions is raised, execution goes from the Statements section into the Exception section and all handling of errors is done in one place.
    Now for the second sort of user defined exception...
    A new requirement has come in from the Finance department who want to have details shown on the order that show a re-order 'indicator' based on the formula ((maximum allowed stock - current stock)/re-order quantity), so this needs calculating and passing to the report...
    SQL> ed
    Wrote file afiedt.buf
      1  create or replace procedure re_order(p_item_id NUMBER, p_quantity NUMBER) is
      2    cursor cur_stock_reorder is
      3      select s.stock_level
      4            ,r.stock_level as reorder_level
      5            ,(r.stock_level*4) as reorder_limit
      6            ,(((r.stock_level*4)-s.stock_level)/p_quantity) as finance_factor
      7      from stock s join reorder_level r on (s.item_id = r.item_id)
      8      where s.item_id = p_item_id;
      9    --
    10    v_stock cur_stock_reorder%ROWTYPE;
    11    --
    12    -- Let's declare our own exceptions for business logic...
    13    exc_not_warranted EXCEPTION;
    14    exc_too_much      EXCEPTION;
    15  begin
    16    OPEN cur_stock_reorder;
    17    FETCH cur_stock_reorder INTO v_stock;
    18    IF cur_stock_reorder%NOTFOUND THEN
    19      RAISE no_data_found;
    20    END IF;
    21    CLOSE cur_stock_reorder;
    22    --
    23    IF v_stock.stock_level >= v_stock.reorder_level THEN
    24      -- Stock is not low enough to warrant an order
    25      RAISE exc_not_warranted;
    26    END IF;
    27    --
    28    IF v_stock.stock_level + p_quantity > v_stock.reorder_limit THEN
    29      -- Required amount is over-ordering
    30      RAISE exc_too_much;
    31    END IF;
    32    --
    33    DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('Order OK.  Printing Order...');
    34    -- Here goes our code to print the order, passing the finance_factor
    35    --
    36  exception
    37    WHEN no_data_found THEN
    38      CLOSE cur_stock_reorder;
    39      DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('Invalid Item ID.');
    40    WHEN exc_not_warranted THEN
    41      DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('Stock has not reached re-order level yet!');
    42    WHEN exc_too_much THEN
    43      DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('Quantity specified is too much.  Max for this item: '
                                  ||to_char(v_stock.reorder_limit-v_stock.stock_level));
    44* end;
    SQL> /
    Procedure created.
    SQL> exec re_order(2,40);
    Order OK.  Printing Order...
    PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
    SQL> exec re_order(2,0);
    BEGIN re_order(2,0); END;
    ERROR at line 1:
    ORA-01476: divisor is equal to zero
    ORA-06512: at "SCOTT.RE_ORDER", line 17
    ORA-06512: at line 1
    SQL>
    Hmm, there's a problem if the person specifies a re-order quantity of zero.  It raises an unhandled exception.
    Well, we could put a condition/check into our code to make sure the parameter is not zero, but again we would be wrapping our code in an IF statement and not dealing with the exception in the exception handler.
    We could do as we did before and just include a simple IF statement to check the value and raise our own user defined exception but, in this instance the error is standard Oracle error (ORA-01476) so we should be able to capture it inside the exception handler anyway... however...
    EXCEPTION
      WHEN ORA-01476 THEN
    ... is not valid.  What we need is to give this Oracle error a name.
    This is done by declaring a user defined exception as we did before and then associating that name with the error number using the PRAGMA EXCEPTION_INIT statement in the declaration section.
    SQL> ed
    Wrote file afiedt.buf
      1  create or replace procedure re_order(p_item_id NUMBER, p_quantity NUMBER) is
      2    cursor cur_stock_reorder is
      3      select s.stock_level
      4            ,r.stock_level as reorder_level
      5            ,(r.stock_level*4) as reorder_limit
      6            ,(((r.stock_level*4)-s.stock_level)/p_quantity) as finance_factor
      7      from stock s join reorder_level r on (s.item_id = r.item_id)
      8      where s.item_id = p_item_id;
      9    --
    10    v_stock cur_stock_reorder%ROWTYPE;
    11    --
    12    -- Let's declare our own exceptions for business logic...
    13    exc_not_warranted EXCEPTION;
    14    exc_too_much      EXCEPTION;
    15    --
    16    exc_zero_quantity EXCEPTION;
    17    PRAGMA EXCEPTION_INIT(exc_zero_quantity, -1476);
    18  begin
    19    OPEN cur_stock_reorder;
    20    FETCH cur_stock_reorder INTO v_stock;
    21    IF cur_stock_reorder%NOTFOUND THEN
    22      RAISE no_data_found;
    23    END IF;
    24    CLOSE cur_stock_reorder;
    25    --
    26    IF v_stock.stock_level >= v_stock.reorder_level THEN
    27      -- Stock is not low enough to warrant an order
    28      RAISE exc_not_warranted;
    29    END IF;
    30    --
    31    IF v_stock.stock_level + p_quantity > v_stock.reorder_limit THEN
    32      -- Required amount is over-ordering
    33      RAISE exc_too_much;
    34    END IF;
    35    --
    36    DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('Order OK.  Printing Order...');
    37    -- Here goes our code to print the order, passing the finance_factor
    38    --
    39  exception
    40    WHEN exc_zero_quantity THEN
    41      DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('Quantity of 0 (zero) is invalid.');
    42    WHEN no_data_found THEN
    43      CLOSE cur_stock_reorder;
    44      DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('Invalid Item ID.');
    45    WHEN exc_not_warranted THEN
    46      DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('Stock has not reached re-order level yet!');
    47    WHEN exc_too_much THEN
    48      DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('Quantity specified is too much.  Max for this item: '
                                  ||to_char(v_stock.reorder_limit-v_stock.stock_level));
    49* end;
    SQL> /
    Procedure created.
    SQL> exec re_order(2,0);
    Quantity of 0 (zero) is invalid.
    PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
    SQL>
    Lastly, let's look at raising our own exceptions with our own exception numbers...
    SQL> ed
    Wrote file afiedt.buf
      1  create or replace procedure re_order(p_item_id NUMBER, p_quantity NUMBER) is
      2    cursor cur_stock_reorder is
      3      select s.stock_level
      4            ,r.stock_level as reorder_level
      5            ,(r.stock_level*4) as reorder_limit
      6            ,(((r.stock_level*4)-s.stock_level)/p_quantity) as finance_factor
      7      from stock s join reorder_level r on (s.item_id = r.item_id)
      8      where s.item_id = p_item_id;
      9    --
    10    v_stock cur_stock_reorder%ROWTYPE;
    11    --
    12    exc_zero_quantity EXCEPTION;
    13    PRAGMA EXCEPTION_INIT(exc_zero_quantity, -1476);
    14  begin
    15    OPEN cur_stock_reorder;
    16    FETCH cur_stock_reorder INTO v_stock;
    17    IF cur_stock_reorder%NOTFOUND THEN
    18      RAISE no_data_found;
    19    END IF;
    20    CLOSE cur_stock_reorder;
    21    --
    22    IF v_stock.stock_level >= v_stock.reorder_level THEN
    23      -- Stock is not low enough to warrant an order
    24      [b]RAISE_APPLICATION_ERROR(-20000, 'Stock has not reached re-order level yet!');[/b]
    25    END IF;
    26    --
    27    IF v_stock.stock_level + p_quantity > v_stock.reorder_limit THEN
    28      -- Required amount is over-ordering
    29     

    its nice article, have put up this one the blog
    site,Nah, I don't have time to blog, but if one of the other Ace's/Experts wants to copy it to a blog with reference back to here (and all due credit given ;)) then that's fine by me.
    I'd go for a book like "Selected articles by OTN members" or something. Does anybody have a list of links of all those mentioned articles?Just these ones I've bookmarked...
    Introduction to regular expressions ... by CD
    When your query takes too long ... by Rob van Wijk
    How to pipeline a function with a dynamic number of columns? by ascheffer
    PL/SQL 101 : Exception Handling by BluShadow

  • Exception Handling in Inbound Synchronous ABAP Proxy

    Hi All,
    I am implementing inbound synchronous proxy which has inbound ,outbound and fault message ( same of SAP-PI).
    I am calling a FM inside inside the method. All the business logic is coded in the FM which also handles the exception.
    The exception raised in the FM is captured in the MESSAGE table of type BAPIRET2.
    During testing I found that the exception raised inside the FM( Message Table) is not passed to Fault message
    which is in the proxy method( If sy-subrc 0, raise excption type MT_FaultMessage was coded after FM).
    I found 5 instance under the Fault message exception.IF_MESSAGEGET_TEXT , IF_MESSAGEGET_LONGTEXT ,IF_AI_APPLICATION_FAULT~GET_RT_FAULT_TEXT,
    GET_SOURCE_POSITION and CONSTRUCTOR.
    Kindly provide the input how to pass the error text captured in MESSAGE TABLE of FM to the exception message MT_FaultMessage of Proxy
    Regards
    Alice Rebecca

    Hi Alice ,
    Please have a look at the below document which contains ways to handle different errors and exception.If you still have doubts please revert back .
    [http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/502a7f0e-e5d9-2910-5aa2-976a8ed8384f?QuickLink=index&overridelayout=true]
    For more specific i.e to handle the retrun message from a BAPI go through the below link .I assuming that you have exception class  already created and it is available in the Exception tab of the execute_synchronus .
    [http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/25/a45c3cff8ca92be10000000a114084/frameset.htm]
    Thanks,
    Anjaneya .
    Edited by: Anjaneya Bhardwaj on Jan 13, 2012 6:26 AM

  • Exception handling in static block

    How to handle and exception raised in static block, pls answer

    Yeah, you are right, but I was just quoting the example on how to use it.
    Now, come to your problem,
    1. Static blocks are executed first time, when a class is loaded, i.e. when first reference of class is made.
    2. So, handle the situation there.
    E.g.
    You have test class:
    public class Test {
         static{
              try{
                   String s = null;
                   File f = new File(s);
              }catch(Throwable ne)
                   System.out.println("Eror");
                   throw new RuntimeException(); // Or use Error depends on your implementation
         public static void abc(){
              System.out.println("Hello");
    Now,
    calling it from another class:
    public class Test1 {
         public static void main(String[] args) {
              try{
              Test.abc(); *// This is the first instance where class for Test will be load and hence the static block will be executed*
              }catch(Throwable th) // Or catch Error
                   th.printStackTrace(); // Do the handling
              System.out.println("Done");
    This is a standard practice. From static block, instead of throwing Error exception, use some of your inherited class from Error. (i.e. create a exception framework inside your application)
    Hope this explains my point.

  • Exception handling in procedures/functions

    I want to know if an exceptions can be handled inside a while loop in Oracle procedures/functions?
    thanks in advanced,

    Abhijit,
    Darn while writting an answer other people already did as well (coooool). I guess I'll still post my reply :).
    In my example, I cause the error by doing 0/0 (can't divide by zero) but the loop still continues. You can copy/paste this in sqlplus and it should give you the same output as me.
    --[START]
    create or replace procedure sp_test as
    li_loop number := -1;
    li_temp number;
    begin
    while li_loop < 10 loop
    li_loop := li_loop + 1;
    begin
    select li_loop/li_loop into li_temp from dual;
    EXCEPTION WHEN OTHERS THEN
    dbms_output.put_line ('ERROR IS : ' || sqlerrm);
    end;
    dbms_output.put_line ('loop value is [' ||to_char(li_loop) || ']');
    end loop;
    end;
    set serveroutput on;
    execute sp_test;
    --[END]
    ERROR IS : ORA-01476: divisor is equal to zero
    loop value is [0]
    loop value is [1]
    loop value is [2]
    loop value is [3]
    loop value is [4]
    loop value is [5]
    loop value is [6]
    loop value is [7]
    loop value is [8]
    loop value is [9]
    loop value is [10]
    PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
    SQL>
    Have a happy coding day,
    Tyler

  • Bean exception handling

    Hello,
    I have a question concerning the bean exception handling. If I'd like to use a DB-connection inside a bean, how to handle the SqlException to display a nice error message to the user (perhaps next to the submit-button or redirect to another site).
    Thx
    Stefan

    Thank you for the reply. That works fine but I wanted
    to avoid using Faces-code inside of the bean because
    of portability. Is there a possibility to throw an
    exception inside of a setter and catch it somewhere
    else to generate the FacesMessage there ?There are at least two ways to look at this.
    First, I've found that you often need one or more beans that ties the UI to the backend. For instance, my backend bean may have a method for saving itself to a database, but that method most likely doesn't return a String, as an "action method" must. I also often need a bean to hold UI values that are pure UI artifacts rather than backend values, say a filter criteria for a database search. In this type of bean (I call them "glue beans", others call them "backing bean" or "code behind file") I don't mind having JSF code, so my original suggestion applies to this type of bean rather than to the real backend beans.
    Second, in an application where you can bind the JSF components directly to backend bean properties and methods, you can set up an error handler in the web.xml file that displays a nice error message and logs details about the problem for further analysis.
    Hans Bergsten (EG member)

  • QUESTION: Multi-instance memory requirements on Linux

    Hi, all.
    I've been out of the loop on Oracle technical details for awhile, and need to re-educate myself on a few things. I'm hoping someone can point me to a book in the online docs which discusses my question.
    Oracle db 10.2.0.2, on Redhat Linux 2.6.9-67.0.0.0.1. This server is a virtual machine, on a VMWare ESX server.
    My question concerns the utilization of memory resources in a multi-instance environment.
    I currently have 2 instances/dbs on this server. Each was configured with an SGA_TARGET of approximately 900MB. java_pool_size, large_pool_size and shared_pool_size are also assigned values in the pfile, which I believe supersedes SGA_TARGET.
    I am tasked with determining if the server can handle a third instance. It's unclear how much load the database will see, so I don't yet know how much memory I will want to allocate to the shared pool for the buffer cache, etc.
    I wanted to see how much memory was being used by the existing instances, so on the server I attempted to capture memory usage information both before, and after, the startup of the second instance.
    I used 'top' for this, and found that the server has a total of 3.12GB of physical memory. Currently there's about 100MB free physical memory.
    the information from 'top' also indicated that physical memory utilization had actually decreased after I started the second instance:
    Before second instance was started:
    Mem: 3115208k total, 3012172k used, 103036k free, 46664k buffers
    Swap: 2031608k total, 77328k used, 1954280k free, 2391148k cached
    After second instance was started:
    Mem: 3115208k total, 2989244k used, 125964k free, 47144k buffers
    Swap: 2031608k total, 89696k used, 1941912k free, 2320184k cached
    Logging into the instance, I ran a 'show SGA', and got an SGA size of about 900MB (as expected). But before I started the instance, there wasn't anywhere near than amount of physical memory available.
    The question I need to answer is whether this server can accomodate a third instance. I gather that the actual amount of memory listed in SGA_TARGET won't be allocated until needed, and I also understand that virtual memory will be used if needed.
    So rather than just asking for 'the answer', I'm hoping someone can point me to a resource which will help me better understand *NIX memory usage behavior in a multi-instance environment...
    Thanks!!
    DW

    Each was configured with an SGA_TARGET of approximately 900MB. java_pool_size, large_pool_size and shared_pool_size are also assigned values in the pfile, which I believe supersedes SGA_TARGET.
    Not quite. If you set non-zero values for those parameters as well as setting SGA_TARGET, then they act as minimum values that have to be maintained before extra free memory is distributed automatically amongst all auto-tuned memory pools. If you've set them as well as SGA_TARGET, you've possibly got a mish-mash of memory settings that aren't doing what you expected. If it was me, I'd stick either to the old settings, or to the new, and try not to mix them (unless your application is very strange and causes the auto-allocate mechanism to apportion memory in ways you know are wrong, in which case setting a floor below which memory allocations cannot go might be useful).
    3GB of physical memory is not much these days. The general rule is that your total SGAs should not make up more than about 50% of physical memory, because you probably need most of the other 50% for PGA use. But if your users aren't going to be doing strenuous sorting (for example), then you can shrink the PGA requirement and nudge the SGA allowance up in its place.
    At 900MB per SGA, you can have two SGAs and not much user activity. That's 1800MB SGA plus, say, 200MB each PGA = 2200MB, leaving about 800MB for contingencies and Linux itself. That's quite tight and I personally wouldn't try to squeeze another instance of the same size into that, not if you want performance to be meaningful.
    Your top figures seem to me to suggest you're paging physical memory out to RAM already, which can't be good!

  • Exception handling for all the insert statements in the proc

    CREATE PROCEDURE TEST (
    @IncrStartDate DATE
    ,@IncrEndDate DATE
    ,@SourceRowCount INT OUTPUT
    ,@TargetRowCount INT OUTPUT
    ,@ErrorNumber INT OUTPUT
    ,@ErrorMessage VARCHAR(4000) OUTPUT
    ,@InsertCase INT --INSERT CASE INPUT
    WITH
    EXEC AS CALLER AS
    BEGIN --Main Begin
    SET NOCOUNT ON
    BEGIN TRY
    DECLARE @SuccessNumber INT = 0
    ,@SuccessMessage VARCHAR(100) = 'SUCCESS'
    ,@BenchMarkLoadFlag CHAR(1)
    ,@BenchmarkFlow INT
    ,@MonthYearStart DATE
    ,@MonthYearEnd DATE
    ,@StartDate DATE
    ,@EndDate DATE
    /* Setting the default values of output parameters to 0.*/
    SET @SourceRowCount = 0
    SET @TargetRowCount = 0
    /*Setting the Start and end date for looping */
    SET @MonthYearStart = @IncrStartDate;
    SET @MonthYearEnd = @IncrEndDate;
    /* Setting the @InsertCase will ensure case wise insertion as this sp will load data in different tables
    @InsertCase =0 means data will be inserted in the target TAB1
    @InsertCase =1 means data will be inserted in the target TAB2
    @InsertCase =2 means data will be inserted in the target TAB3
    @InsertCase =3 means data will be inserted in the target TAB4
    @InsertCase =4 means data will be inserted in the target TAB5
    @InsertCase =5 means data will be inserted in the target TAB6
    if @InsertCase =0
    WHILE (@MonthYearStart <= @MonthYearEnd)
    BEGIN
    SET @StartDate = @MonthYearStart;
    SET @EndDate = @MonthYearEnd;
    /* Delete from target where date range given from input parameter*/
    DELETE FROM TAB1
    WHERE [MONTH] BETWEEN MONTH(@StartDate) AND MONTH(@EndDate)
    AND [YEAR] BETWEEN year(@StartDate) and year(@EndDate)
    /*Insert data in target-TAB1 */
    BEGIN TRANSACTION
    INSERT INTO TAB1
    A,B,C
    SELECT
    A,BC
    FROM XYZ
    COMMIT TRANSACTION
    SET @MonthYearStart = DATEADD(MONTH, 1, @MonthYearStart)
    SELECT @TargetRowCount = @TargetRowCount + @@ROWCOUNT;
    END -- End of whileloop
    END TRY
    BEGIN CATCH
    IF @@TRANCOUNT>0
    ROLLBACK TRANSACTION
    SELECT @ErrorNumber = ERROR_NUMBER() ,@ErrorMessage = ERROR_MESSAGE();
    END CATCH
    END--End of Main Begin
    I have the above proc inserting data based on parameters  where in @InsertCase  is used for case wise execution.
     I have written the whole proc with exception handling using try catch block.
    I have just added one insert statement here for 1 case  now I need to add further insert  cases
    INSERT INTO TAB4
                    A,B,C
    SELECT
                                    A,BC
    FROM XYZ
    INSERT INTO TAB3
                    A,B,C
    SELECT
                                    A,BC
    FROM XYZ
    INSERT INTO TAB2
                    A,B,C
    SELECT
                                    A,BC
    FROM XYZ
    I will be using following to insert further insert statements 
    if @InsertCase =1 
    I just needed to know where will be my next insert statement should be fitting int his code so that i cover exception handling for all the code
    Mudassar

    Hi Erland & Mudassar, I have attempted to recreate Mudassar's original problem..here is my TABLE script;
    USE [MSDNTSQL]
    GO
    /****** Object: Table [dbo].[TAB1] Script Date: 2/5/2014 7:47:48 AM ******/
    SET ANSI_NULLS ON
    GO
    SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON
    GO
    CREATE TABLE [dbo].[TAB1](
    [COL1] [nvarchar](1) NULL,
    [COL2] [nvarchar](1) NULL,
    [COL3] [nvarchar](1) NULL,
    [START_MONTH] [int] NULL,
    [END_MONTH] [int] NULL,
    [START_YEAR] [int] NULL,
    [END_YEAR] [int] NULL
    ) ON [PRIMARY]
    GO
    Then here is a CREATE script for the SPROC..;
    USE [MSDNTSQL]
    GO
    /****** Object: StoredProcedure [dbo].[TryCatchTransactions1] Script Date: 2/5/2014 7:51:33 AM ******/
    SET ANSI_NULLS ON
    GO
    SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON
    GO
    CREATE PROCEDURE [dbo].[TryCatchTransactions1] (
    @IncrStartDate DATE
    ,@IncrEndDate DATE
    ,@SourceRowCount INT OUTPUT
    ,@TargetRowCount INT OUTPUT
    ,@ErrorNumber INT OUTPUT
    ,@ErrorMessage VARCHAR(4000) OUTPUT
    ,@InsertCase INT --INSERT CASE INPUT
    WITH
    EXEC AS CALLER AS
    BEGIN --Main Begin
    SET NOCOUNT ON
    BEGIN TRY
    DECLARE @SuccessNumber INT = 0
    ,@SuccessMessage VARCHAR(100) = 'SUCCESS'
    ,@BenchMarkLoadFlag CHAR(1)
    ,@BenchmarkFlow INT
    ,@MonthYearStart DATE
    ,@MonthYearEnd DATE
    ,@StartDate DATE
    ,@EndDate DATE
    /* Setting the default values of output parameters to 0.*/
    SET @SourceRowCount = 0
    SET @TargetRowCount = 0
    /*Setting the Start and end date for looping */
    SET @MonthYearStart = @IncrStartDate;
    SET @MonthYearEnd = @IncrEndDate;
    /* Setting the @InsertCase will ensure case wise insertion as this sp will load data in different tables
    @InsertCase =0 means data will be inserted in the target TAB1
    @InsertCase =1 means data will be inserted in the target TAB2
    @InsertCase =2 means data will be inserted in the target TAB3
    @InsertCase =3 means data will be inserted in the target TAB4
    @InsertCase =4 means data will be inserted in the target TAB5
    @InsertCase =5 means data will be inserted in the target TAB6
    IF @InsertCase =0
    WHILE (@MonthYearStart <= @MonthYearEnd)
    BEGIN
    SET @StartDate = @MonthYearStart;
    SET @EndDate = @MonthYearEnd;
    /* Delete from target where date range given from input parameter*/
    DELETE FROM TAB1
    WHERE START_MONTH BETWEEN MONTH(@StartDate) AND MONTH(@EndDate)
    AND START_YEAR BETWEEN year(@StartDate) and YEAR(@EndDate)
    /*Insert data in target-TAB1 */
    BEGIN TRANSACTION
    INSERT INTO TAB1 (COL1,COL2,COL3)
    VALUES ('Z','X','Y')
    SELECT COL1, COL2, COL3
    FROM TAB1
    COMMIT TRANSACTION
    SET @MonthYearStart = DATEADD(MONTH, 1, @MonthYearStart)
    SELECT @TargetRowCount = @TargetRowCount + @@ROWCOUNT;
    END -- End of whileloop
    END TRY
    BEGIN CATCH
    IF @@TRANCOUNT > 0
    ROLLBACK TRANSACTION
    SELECT @ErrorNumber = ERROR_NUMBER() ,@ErrorMessage = ERROR_MESSAGE();
    END CATCH
    PRINT @SUCCESSMESSAGE
    END--End of Main Begin
    GO
    I am just trying to help --danny rosales
    UML, then code

  • Exception handling In File Adapter

    My requirement is that i am reading a file using file adapter but the file is not in correct format so it is not reading that file and even not making any bpel instance.
    so i need to add exception handling that show me the above error(file read failure).
    we have log file in that it is showing this error but i need to show that error on BPEL console.
    Please help how to proceed with this.
    Thanks
    Vivek Garg

    I am able to call another bpel when error occured in file reading Bpel.
    the second Bpel will handle the error and shows the error. but addition to that i need BPEL process name which fails(File Read BPEL) and call second BPEL.
    Thanks
    Vivek Garg

  • Exception Handling-rite way??

    Hi Friends,
    This Exception handling is really causing some problems for me.I run a query,return the resultset,cook the data from my other java class and display it thru my jsp and the last statement from my jsp is to call the close method(commented out).The problem is if some unknown Exception arises the close() method is not being called,causing open connections which later on are
    creating some disasters.I tried to implement it now using the finally method,so that it always gets closed,but hte problem is when i call the ReturnResultSet() method and try to cook the data,it says "ResultSet Closed".Please tell me which is the right way to implement this:
    public ResultSet ReturnResultSet(String Query) throws Exception
         try{  
           if (datasource != null) {
             connection = datasource.getConnection();
             if (connection != null) {
               statement = connection.createStatement( );
               resultset = statement.executeQuery(Query);         
           return resultset;
         } catch (SQLException sqle)
           sqle.printStackTrace();
           return null;
         finally {       
         try {
           if (resultset != null) resultset.close();
           if (statement != null) statement.close();
           if (connection != null) connection.close();
         catch (SQLException sqle) {
           sqle.printStackTrace();
    public void close()
       try { resultset.close(); } catch (Exception ex) {}
       try { statement.close(); } catch (Exception ex) {}
       try { connection.close(); } catch (Exception ex) {}
    */Any help would be appreciated and some duke dollars would be awarded too.Thanks

    Ok I think i got your point and i should award you
    the duke dollars too,but one last thing to ask.I call
    the close() method after all my processing is over,I
    just
    wanna know should I have the connection.close() thing
    inside it,becuase dont that contradicts the whole
    connection pool thing,as i am closing a connection
    and it has to open a new connection for every
    request.Or should i just have resultset.close() and
    statement.close() in it.
    Thanks for all your helpAre you talking about a standard J2EE container-provided connection pool? If so, then yes, you still need to 'close' the connection. That doesn't actually close it, it just tells the pool it is available to be used again the next time someone asks it for a connection. Hopefully you're not writing your own home-grown "connection pool".

  • Exception handling for Scanner console input

    I'm trying to add exception handling to a Scanner console to deal with exceptions caused by non-numeric input. My idea was to do use a try/catch in a for loop and break if no exception occurs.
    Whats happening is the "iNumber = console.nextInt(); " does nothing on subsequent retries, when an exception occurs. That is, I enter "123w", an InputMismatchException occurs, goes into the first catch block, hits "continue" and goes back into the for loop, hits the "iNumber = console.nextInt(); ", then immediately blows through it without executing. Thus, I hit my max loop count and exit with iNumber = 0.
    I'm thinking I may need to instantiate "static Scanner console = new Scanner(System.in);" again in the event of an exception?
    Thanks for any feedback. I'm brand new at Java and learning as fast as I can :)
    Here is the code:
    class ConsoleInput
         public ConsoleInput() // constructor
         static Scanner console = new Scanner(System.in);
         public int GetInput()
              int iNumber = 0;
              for(int i=0; i<3; i++)
              try
                   System.out.print("Please enter a number: ");
                   iNumber = console.nextInt(); // get console input
                   break;
              catch(java.util.InputMismatchException ex)
                   continue;
              catch(Exception ex)
                   continue;
         return iNumber;
    }

    public class Scratch {
      public static void main(String[] args) {
        Scanner sc = new Scanner(System.in);
        boolean gotAValidInt = false;
        int theInt;
        System.out.println("Enter an int");
        do {
          try {
            theInt = sc.nextInt();
            gotAValidInt = true;
          catch (InputMismatchException exc) {
            System.out.println("Not an int. Try again.");
            sc.next(); // consume the non-int that nextInt couldn't consume
        } while (!gotAValidInt);
    }There are different ways you could structure your loop, but the key is that when nextInt throws an exception, you have to call next() in the catch block to consume the token that nextInt couldn't.
    Edited by: jverd on May 2, 2008 1:52 PM

Maybe you are looking for