Exchange 2010 Auto-Mapping not removing mailbox from Outlook

I am having an issue that others seem to have as well. When I give Full Access to another mailbox, auto-mapping brings it in to the users Outlook 2010 client. However, when I remove that users access to the shared mailbox it doesn't remove the
mailbox from Outlook.
I know that I can go the shared account in ADSIedit and edit the msExchDelegateListLink and remove the user that should no longer have access, but this is not a good solution. I feel this is a bug that Microsoft should address and release a patch for.
Does anyone know of a fix? Not a workaround, an actual fix?

Hi,
Based on my experience, we can take the following actions to remove the additional mailbox :
1. Turn off the auto-mapping feature for your account:
Add-MailboxPermission usermailbox –user PersonBeingGrantedRights –AccessRights ‘FullAccess’ –AutoMapping:$false
2. Remove the full access permission by using EMC or EMS.
3. Clear the msExchDelegateListLink attribute for all mailboxes which are being displayed as an additional mailbox in Outlook. In your case, you need change 10 msExchDelegateListLink attributes.
If you have any question, please feel free to let me know.
Thanks,
Angela
Angela Shi
TechNet Community Support

Similar Messages

Auto-mapping of shared mailboxes in a resource forest scenario

In a resource forest scenario you assign full access to a shared mailbox using:
Add-MailboxPermission -Identity SharedMailbox -User AccountForestDomain\UserID -AccessRights FullAccess
This provides the user in the account forest full access, but it will NOT auto-map the shared mailbox in Outlook.
If you use the command:
Add-MailboxPermission -Identity SharedMailbox -User UserID -AccessRights FullAccess
and UserID is the disabled account of the linked mailbox in the resource forest then the user in the account forest does not have the necessary permission to
open the mailbox, but the auto-mapping of the mailbox in Outlook works.
You have to use both commands to have the auto-mapping feature and have access to the shared mailbox.
This looks like another issue of the auto-mapping feature. The intention of the feature is good, but the way it was implemented can be improved.
How do you configure full access to shared mailboxes in a resource forest scenario?

Hi J-H,
Because i don’t have such a lab environment, so I am unable to do a test.
Now let’s separate the issue.
1. The first issue is
[email protected]
unable to auto configure outlook profile.
I suggest you
changing the user’s attributes in the account forest, does it work?
2. The second issue is
[email protected] unable to open a shared mailbox in the resource
forest.
At first, I suggest you create a shared mailbox in resource forest with this command.
New-Mailbox -name
<name> -Database <Database name> -OrganizationalUnit Users –UserPrincipalName
<UPN value, example: [email protected]> -<ResourceType: Room, Equipment or Shared>
Managing
Resource Mailboxes in Exchange Server 2007 (Part 1)
Then test if you can log on the shared mailbox via outlook.
If yes, then grant full access right for
[email protected]
to [email protected]
Resource:
Shared mailbox
permission in resource forest with linked users
Manage Full Access Permissions
Please remember to click “Mark as Answer” on the post that helps you, and to click “Unmark as Answer” if a marked post does not actually answer your question. This can be beneficial to other community members reading the thread.

Exchange 2010 Sp2 - Does not audit Shared calender access

I have Exchange 2010 sp2 , I have enabled mailbox audit on few mailbox , as well as MSExchange IS logs for logon event to expert.(event ID 1016),
I am trying to get folderbind events , from shared calender access , like Non-owner mailbox event or anything that I can run audit get the detail if non-owner accessed the calender or mailbox folder etc..
I found changes are logged like create , delete or any changes but not folderbind
i have following on to few mailboxes.
AuditEnabled : True
AuditLogAgeLimit : 90.00:00:00
AuditAdmin : {Update, Move, MoveToDeletedItems, SoftDelete, HardDelete, FolderBind, SendAs, SendOnBehalf, Create}
AuditDelegate : {Update, Move, MoveToDeletedItems, SoftDelete, HardDelete, FolderBind, SendAs, SendOnBehalf, Create}
AuditOwner : {Update, Move, MoveToDeletedItems, SoftDelete, HardDelete, Create}
Can some one please help me to find what is missing to get folderbind audit events when any non-owner access anything like shared calender etc..
Thank you

Hi ANdy,
Yes we have the followed the same commands as mentioned in both the article and the PPT as well. But i got the errors as mentioned in my thread above.
Databases were not getting mounted, even when i tried the resume command still it failed.
regards
abubakar
Md.Abubakar Noorani IT Systems Engineer Serco Ltd.
Ok, because that is the part I wasnt clear about. I assume that the servers in the DR site are not set for automatic activation, so in order for them to mount, you would have to clear that block.
When you tried to move the databases to the DR site, you got the same error message as you got when you ran the restore-databaseavailibilitygroup command?
So, is everything back to normal? Did you run test-replicationhealth before you failed over?
Also, anything of use in the cluster logs? “cluster log /g”.
I assume the MAPI bindings and NICS are set correctly since this worked before.
Twitter!:

How can I unsync email so deleting from one device will not remove it from all devices?

How do I unsync email so deleting from one device will not remove it from all devices?

Sounds like you have an IMAP/Exchange mail account (vice a POP3 account). By design, an IMPA/Exchange account synchronized your mail boxes among different devices. That behavior can't be changed.

I am new to mac air. Today i installed (unsuccessfully!) MAPLE16 on my mac book air. Now since it does not work properly (it also does not appear in applications) i decide to delete it. I could not remove it from launchpad . i need urgent help

i am new to mac air. Today i installed (unsuccessfully!) MAPLE16 on my mac book air. Now since it does not work properly (it also does not appear in applications) i decide to delete it. I could not remove it from launchpad . i need urgent help from your side.

Any third-party software that doesn't install by drag-and-drop into the Applications folder, and uninstall by drag-and-drop to the Trash, is a system modification.
Whenever you remove system modifications, they must be removed completely, and the only way to do that is to use the uninstallation tool, if any, provided by the developers, or to follow their instructions. If the software has been incompletely removed, you may have to re-download or even reinstall it in order to finish the job.
I never install system modifications myself, and I don't know how to uninstall them. You'll have to do your own research to find that information.
Here are some general guidelines to get you started. Suppose you want to remove something called “BrickMyMac” (a hypothetical example.) First, consult the product's Help menu, if there is one, for instructions. Finding none there, look on the developer's website, say www.brickmyrmac.com. (That may not be the actual name of the site; if necessary, search the Web for the product name.) If you don’t find anything on the website or in your search, contact the developer. While you're waiting for a response, download BrickMyMac.dmg and open it. There may be an application in there such as “Uninstall BrickMyMac.” If not, open “BrickMyMac.pkg” and look for an Uninstall button.
You generally have to reboot in order to complete an uninstallation.
If you can’t remove software in any other way, you’ll have to erase and install OS X. Never install any third-party software unless you're sure you know how to uninstall it; otherwise you may create problems that are very hard to solve.
You may be advised by others to try to remove complex system modifications by hunting for files by name, or by running "utilities" that purport to remove software. I don't give such advice. Those tactics often will not work and maymake the problem worse.

TS3899 Sending a meeting invite from Exchange 2007 account located in Central Time from Outlook 2010 Email Client located in Eastern Time cause meeting to show up 1 hour early on iPhone

Sending a meeting invite from Exchange 2007 account located in Central Time from Outlook 2010 Email Client located in Eastern Time cause meeting to show up 1 hour early on iPhone.

The meeting invite is being sent from a Computer through the Outlook 2010 Email Client. Both Computer and Outlook 2010 are set to Eastern Time. The OWA (Outlook Web Access) for the 2007 account is set to Eastern Time. The Outlook 2010 Email Client is connected to an Exchange 2007 account and the Exchange server for the exchange 2007 account is located in Chicago (Central Time) and is set to Central Time. When the meeting invite is sent from the Outlook 2010 Client the recipient receives the invite on his/her iPhone(set and located in the Eastern Time Zone) and a mime-attachment.ics file is attached to the meeting invite email. There is no info displayed in the subject line or message body. If the iPhone user opens the attachment it displays the meeting date and time and any other info that was sent from Outlook. The Outlook 2010 user sets the meeting for 10:00am to 11:00am. when the meeting invite mime-attachment.ics file is opened on the iPhone the meeting is displayed as 9:00am to 10:00am. if the iPhone user adds the ics file to his/her calendar it adds a meeting event that is scheduled 1 hour earlier than it is supposed to be. I had the iPhone user to set Time Zone support on and off and there is no change.

Issue with Update Rollup 5 for Exchange 2010 SP3 - Mailboxes that were auto mapped not working

Below is my response in another thread but creating a new one in the hopes that someone has the same issue and a solution besides mine below.
Ever since we installed Update Rollup 5 for SP3 Exchange 2010 mailboxes that were auto mapped are not accessible. They all get the same error.
Cannot expand the folder. The set of folders cannot be opened. The attempt to log on to the Microsoft Exchange has failed.
What I have been doing is removing the users permission, then adding them back using the noautomap switch in Powershell. After doing that, the user manually adds the mailbox and all is well.
Just a note here, I suspect it may have something to do with the version of Outlook 2010. We are running an older version here. I think only SP1 with no other incremental updates. Office is up to SP2. Also, one of the users I was working with could not access
the mailbox no matter what we tried but she can walk over to another workstation and open Outlook and access the very same mailbox so that pretty much proves its software related particularly with Outlook.
I cannot reproduce the problem on a workstation (XP) with a newer version of Outlook.
This has been wearing me out and I suspected the Update Rollup all long. Now I am confident as others are having the same problem. If you find out anything on how to fix this other than the steps above, let me know.

Not sure why it was suggested to use the auto mapping feature to grant permissions because that is the component that is causing the issue. Also, there is nothing wrong with the auto configuration because the user can access their own mailbox just fine and
also select mailboxes in their Outlook that were NOT auto mapped.
With that said, here is how I fixed them all.
Remove the permissions using the Exchange Console. Don't forget Send As
Wait about 15 minutes. The mailbox should disappear from the users Outlook
Open an Exchange PowerShell window and run the following command:
.\add-mailboxpermissionsnoautomap.ps1 -Identity mailbox -User user -AccessRights FullAccess
Have the user add the mailbox to their Outlook using the manual process.
All is well....
If you don't have the PS script add-mailboxpermissionsnoautomap.ps1, you can download it. I stumbled across it a few years ago and use it all the time. If you can't find it, just use the Exchange built in command for adding mailbox folder permissions but
specify automap $false.
The idea here is to grant the user access without auto mapping.

Removing mailbox server from Exchange 2010 DAG - Node not fully cleaned up

Hi,
We are in the process of decommissioning some old Exchange 2010 servers. I have just attempted to remove one of our mailbox servers and have received a number of errors, related to its removal from the DAG.
I have already removed the Public Folder replicas and all mailbox database copies. I then tried to evict the server from the DAG and received the following warning:
I then ran the command that was recommended, from another server and in an administrative command prompt:
I have looked in this log on both the server I ran the command on, a CAS server, and the mailbox server itself and can see no evidence of this error 2 that is listed here.
If I run the Powershell command to look at the DAG I cannot see it there any more. I am assuming that this error message might only be an issue if I was planning on re-using this server somewhere else in Exchange or perhaps adding this server to another
DAG. But I just want to decommission it.
Can anyone put my mind at rest as to whether this is a genuine concern or not. If not my next step is to uninstall Exchange 2010 from this server and turn it off.

Hi Belinda,
I get the following:
[PS] C:\Windows\system32>Get-DatabaseAvailabilityGroup
Name Member Servers
Operational Servers
DAG01 {WSR-EX-01, WSR-EX-101, WSR21}
It doesn't look like that server is part of the DAG any more as far as I can see. I just can't explain that error message reported from the cluster command. As far as I can see the server is isolated. I already removed its database copies as a pre-requisite
before removing it from the DAG as per this guide:
http://www.experts-exchange.com/Software/Server_Software/Email_Servers/Exchange/Q_27039933.html
I found a nice little script that gave reports on your Public Folder configuration and it highlighted that some of our folders were not being replicated properly across our mailbox servers. This helped me in removing these services from the server.
It is currently doing nothing at this time as far as Exchange Services are concerned.

Exchange 2013 - can no longer move mailboxes from Exchange 2010 to Ex 2013.

Migrating to Exchange 2013 from Exchange 2010. Created Ex 2013, moved some mailboxes OK. Then could no longer move mailboxes. No errors. The Migration email says complete. Synced: none, Total Mailboxes: none.
Tried several mailboxes. Same result.
Ex 2010 is SP3 RU6, (at least it says RU6 is installed in Programs/Features. The build is for SP3 w/o RU6???)
Ex 2013 is SP1 aka CU4.
How to proceed???
john11

After many attempts to fix the issue (move remaining 4 mailboxes from Exchange 2010 to Exchange 2013) I contacted Microsoft and we resolved the issue. Here's how.
btw - Thanks for the suggestions from Ed. However, they did not seem to move us forward.
What did work:
1. On the Exchange 2010 box, create a new database. (Someone else suggested this also). Then move the remaining Exchange 2010 mailboxes to this new db. Then after that, move the 4 mailboxes to Exchange 2013 using the GUI on Ex 2013. This only worked for one
of the four mailboxes. The other 3 failed.
2. Apparently, we need to restart the Microsoft Exchange Mailbox Replication service on the Exchange 2013 after several failed move attempts to clear cache related to the moves.
3. Then on the Exchange 2013 box, use this Exchange shell command:
New-MoveRequest -identity "[email protected]" -TargetDatabase "Exchange 2013 DB name" -BadItemLimit '500' -verbose
This moved the remaining 3 mailboxes including the Discovery mailbox. It took some time. But we could check the progress using
Get-MoveRequest
The MS Tech was terrific. Really knew his stuff. And all mailboxes are on Exchange 2013. Well, the last one is still moving, but I am optimistic.
Thanks for the suggestions. I had to get this done and the MS Tech made that happen.
john11

Appointments from Exchange 2010 show as Mail in Mailbox

I have a very frustrating issue with a single user on one of our post offices. For reasons unknown appointments sent to the user from Exchange 2010 appear as mail items instead of appointments within the mailbox. Other users on the same post office do not get the same issue. I have tried resetting the user's views and a full client reset via maintenance. I have set the user's client settings to be the same as another user who does not get the issue without any luck either. Maintenance checks on the account does not flag any errors. I'm pretty certain I'm missing something very simple, but alas I can not think what.
Software wise we're running client 8.0.1 on post office agent version 8.0.2. We seem to get the same results regardless of the Client version of outlook, (we have tried the web version and 2003 and 2010 of the client). Anything else I could try would be greatly appreciated.
Kind Regards
Rob

In article <[email protected]>, Rob naylor
wrote:
> Software wise we're running client 8.0.1 on post office agent version
> 8.0.2.
>
How about updating those as they are a bit old.
Try looking at that user's account from another machine and from
WebAccess (if installed).
It is good to separate the PC from the user account as sometimes an odd
problem can be from some funky issue on the PC.
I'm not surprised that different versions of the Exchange 2010 client
doesn't make a difference as there is the formatting is set when
Exchange formats the outgoing to the internet.
A thought there, is your user setup as a contact on the Exchange
system, there have been settings in the past that caused invalid
formatting of internet messages. Something to the effect that 'this
user is on OutLook/Exchange vs regular internet standards'.
Has there been a single appointment sent from a user on that Exchange
system to two of your users?
Andy Konecny
Konecny Consulting Inc. in Toronto
"Give more than others think is wise
Challenge yourself beyond what others think is right"
Michael 'Pinball' Clemens

On-premise Exchange 2010 SMTP Relay to O365 mailboxes does not resolve Display Name

Dear All,
We have SMTP relay receive connector in our on-premise Exchange 2010 server that accepts emails from anonymous users.
The Externally Secured check box is checked. Display Name of the sender in Emails to mailboxes in on-premise is resolved correctly.
But the display name of the sender in the same email to mailboxes which are migrated to O365 is not getting resolved.
Please let me know if anyone has seen this issue. Some of our mailboxes are in O365 and some are in On-premise server.
Thanks
Fred

Do you have a hybrid configuration set up, and if not, is there any particular reason?
Ed Crowley MVP "There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems."

Removing "Not Deleted" Mailboxes from a Database

Before I go anywhere, let me explain what I mean by "Not Deleted" mailboxes - We will be deleting and recreating a pair of databases this weekend. A s part of this process, we move all mailboxes from these databases to the other 22 mailbox databases
in the corporation, leaving our databases empty. We then run a command to find the soft-deleted and disconnected mailboxes and handle them (remove the former and reconnect the latter so we can move them to another database). When I ran this script
on one of the two databases, I found that the database had two supposedly live mailboxes on it.
So I ran Get-MailboxStatistics -Database and got info about these two mailboxes. Neither shows as being SoftDeleted or Disconnected, and neither has a DisconnectDate. So they should be live mailboxes, with an AD account. So I checked them
and found one had an account - but was on another database on a totally different server (in fact, in the other DAG). And the other belonged to an account that was deleted last November.
So, these two mailboxes appear to be zombies, with no life and no soul, but doomed to foil my plans to delete the database gracefully - they are all that stands between me and the success of my mission. Now, I know I can take the database offline,
delete the database files, and bring them back online and that will kill these zombie mailboxes, but I was hoping someone had a way I can delete them gracefully so I don't feel like I've just used a sledgehammer on my servers. I tried Remove-StoreMailbox,
but it requires that the mailbox have a status of either SoftDeleted or Disconnected - and from what I've read online, those are the only two accepted options.
So I come to you for possible guidance - keep in mind that these are totally unnecessary mailboxes and I have no qualms about deleting the database if that what it comes down to. Anyone have any other suggestions? Thanks ...
Will

There were two active mailboxes showing from the "Get-MailboxStatistics -Database <database name>" command, even though the database showed no active mailboxes when running "Get-Mailbox -Database <database name>" command. Neither of these
had a disconnected date, and neither showed a value in the Reason field. Now for your answers:
1. One of these mailboxes showed as being on another database, same GUID, etc, and was able to be accessed on that other database. However, Get-MailboxStatistics - Database <database name> showed that it also existed on this database.
We couldn't connect an account to this mailbox, nor could we delete it - the command (below) said the mailbox was on another database (which it was).
Connect-Mailbox -Identity <mbx GUID> -Database <name of the database we wished to delete> -User <account SAM account name> -Alias <account SAM account name> -Shared -DomainController <domain controller>
2. The command was what I show above.
Post Mortem: Since we had to delete the database, and since neither of them were needed, we just went forward with our work. I was hoping we'd be able to remove these mailboxes gracefully, but none of the tools we had available worked for the
job.

Exchange 2010 Free busy not working from remote site to main site "exception message is: Could not find a base address"

Hi all , I have an exchange 2010 SP 2 environment with 2 sites , the remote site FL free busy has NEVER worked and I get this error on the remote site , is this related ?
thanks
Log Name: Application
Source: System.ServiceModel 3.0.0.0
Date: :
Event ID: 3
Task Category: WebHost
Level: Error
Keywords: Classic
User: SYSTEM
Computer: FL-CAS1.WOMBAT.LOCAL
free bust works from WITHIN the remote (FL ) site , but NEVER to the main (WASH) site , it has Never worked ,I am thing that this error is related
thanks I have no idea how to fix
Description:
WebHost failed to process a request.
Sender Information: System.ServiceModel.ServiceHostingEnvironment+HostingManager/17256489
Exception: System.ServiceModel.ServiceActivationException:
The service '/EWS/exchange.asmx' cannot be activated due to an exception during compilation. The exception message is: Could not find a base address that matches scheme http for the endpoint with binding CustomBinding. Registered base address schemes
are [https].. ---> System.InvalidOperationException:
Could not find a base address that matches scheme http for the endpoint with binding
++++

Hi
This issue could be with corruption in Autodiscover and web services virtual directory
Replace Web.config file for Autodiscover and web services virtual directory from the other working site
Delete and Recreate Autodiscover and web services virtual directory
Do this only on the affected site
Remember to mark as helpful if you find my contribution useful or as an answer if it does answer your question.That will encourage me - and others - to take time out to help you Check out my latest blog posts on http://exchangequery.com Thanks Sathish
(MVP)

Exchange 2010 public folder not showing on exchange 20003 mailbox

Hi,
I have public folder on exchange 2003 and separate public folder on exchange 2010. On exchange 2010 user mailbox, I can see both 2003 and 2010 public folders. On exchange 2003 user mailbox, I can only see 2003 public folders. It is not the permission issue
as I have given the user "owner" right and see not able 2010 public folder inless i move 2003 user mailbox to 2010 exchange.
Appreciate if anyone could help me if to point me to directions or any hotfix I can run?
Thank you very much.
Pwint

Are you using OWA or Outlook to view the public folders?
If you're using OWA, the reason you can't see the folders is that OWA in Exchange 2003 uses WebDAV, which is no longer present in Exchange 2010.
If you're using Outlook, you'll need to use the troubleshooting logs to determine the cause of the problems.
It could be related to Outlook trying to connect directly to 2010 mailbox server instead of CAS. Because normally the mailbox server is installed without the CAS role, it does not allow a direct Outlook connection. Or it could be something else,
like authentication.

How to reset logs on Exchange 2010 after Event 518 stops backups from completing?

I'm only able to find references to resetting logs Exchange 2000 and 2003. I'm looking for info for Exchange 2010.
There appears to be some kind of corrupt logs issue with one of our mailbox databases. The corrupt logs cause the full backup to fail and because the full backup fails, the logs just get worse and keep growing.
The server has event ID 518 that says a log is "is missing (error -528) and cannot be used. If this log file is required for recovery, a good copy of the log file will be needed for recovery to complete successfully. "
How do e get past this and stop the backup job from trying to look for this log file and start over? I know that a full backup is supposed to clear the logs, but it will not happen because the backup never completes due to this log error.

its still same for 2010
Stop all the databases in the storage group.
Verify the state of each database file in the particular storage group. For information about how to verify the state of each database file, see the "Database states" section.
Perform one of the following actions:
If one or more of the databases are in a Dirty Shutdown or Inconsistent state, determine which transaction log files can be removed without affecting database consistency.
For more information, see the "Log files" section.
If all the databases are in a Clean Shutdown or Consistent state, you may remove all the transaction log files except for the current transaction log file. Removing the
current log file when all databases are in a Clean Shutdown state will cause a reset of the log file sequence. This does not prevent databases from starting. However, a reset of the log file sequence affects the ability to roll a
database forward from a previous backup if the situation occurs.
Copy all the transaction log files that you want to remove to a different location before you permanently remove them from the transaction log hard disk. Do not permanently delete the transaction log files until you have
successfully completed a full online backup of all the databases in the storage group.

Exchange 2010 Auto-Mapping not removing mailbox from Outlook

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for