Exchange rate does not reflect in Sales Document

Hi,
I have configured a new exchange rate for JPY -> USD, but when I create a new Sales Order, the exchange rate at the Item Level -> Sales A is still showing the old exchange rate, how can I solve this?
Thanks for your help.

Hi,
Maintain exchange rate type in customer master sales tab.
Check the exchange rate type and valid from values in OB08.
Regards,
Chandra

Similar Messages

"An Exchange Rate Does not Exist" error while creating an item

Hi..
Pre-requisites: RMS is installed without base data
We are trying to create an item in RMS by filling the required information in "Item Maintenance window" and "Supplier details" screen. After this is done when we select the "Retail by Zone" link and the application prompts an error message : "An Exchange Rate Does not Exist", and all the values in "Retail by zone" screen are not populated. How do we ressolve this?
Thanks in Advance
Yamini

Also, make sure that if a currency has a rate entry for example, 01-jul-2010, then make sure that ALL other currencies have a rate entry for 01-jul-2010, even if the rate has not changed for other currencies - a little trick I learned from an Oracle consultant.
Alan

Output determination does not happen during Sales Document creation

Hello All,
I am facing an issue where the automatic output determination does not happen when the Sales Order is created. Let me explain a bit on the background.
Output type ZDL2 has been defined as a special function (TNAPR-NACHA = 8) attached to a custom program and Form routine to create Outbound delivery after successful posting of the sales order.
Condition records are maintained to trigger this output for the Key Combination of Sales Org/Distrib Channel/Division/Route. Access sequence has also been correctly maintained for the above fields.
When the Sales order is saved, the output is supposed to be triggered but out of several sales orders created, it triggered for just one document. We have no clues on what could be the issue.
One question here is, can we have the access sequence maintained for the fields from both header and item level (ie KOMKBV1 and KOMPBV1). Please be reminded that, in our case, the field ROUTE comes from the field catalog KOMPBV1.
Another point which we noticed is that, the Function Module COMMUNICATION_AREA_KOMPBV1 which is supposed to fill the Item data Communication structure for output determination was never called.
Has anyone came across such situations. Comments or suggestions are really appreciated.
Kind Regards
Sabu Kuriakose

Sabu Kuriakose,
Since you are using ROUTE as one parameter for the condition table, and it is at the item level.
the output is triggered at the header level.
So a sales order can contain multiple items with different routes. so at header level how will u identify the route ?
the fields might be available for creatign the condition table but the problem is the fields should get the value during order processing.
in the analsysis screen you will know that the field is getting the value of the ROUTE or not ?
also for creating a delivery you need a shipping point. same as above you can hae multiple items with different shipping points. how will u consider that scenario.
If you can explain that, then that will be helpful to answer your problem.

Exchange Rate Ratio Not Reflected in New Exchange Rate

We've reached the maximum exchange rate value between IDR and USD (9,999 to 1) based upon our current RATIO of 1,000 to 1. In our sandbox, via t-code OBBS I've changed the ratio for IDR to USD to 10,000 to 1 with a Valid From date of 12/1/2008. Then, via t-code OC41 I created a new IDR to USD rate with a Valid From date of 12/5/2008. When I press enter, the OLD ratio of 1,000 is pulled in, not the new value of 10,000. I've tried several different dates, ensuring that the rate date is the same or after the ratio date. None of these approaches change the results. Is there a RATIO activation step I need to perform before adding the new RATE?

The only way around this situation was to write down all the existing IDR-USD rates and their valid from dates and delete them via OC41. Via OBBS, I left the existing 1,000 to 1 IDR-USD ratio in place and added the new 10,000 to 1 ratio with a date greater than the ratio entry but less than the first rate date. I then readded the IDR-USD rates, adjusting the values for the new ratio, and they pulled in the 10,000 to 1 ratio.

Change in Quota at Exchange Server does not reflect in Outlook

I have changed the quota for a database on the exchange server from the default 2 GB to Unlimited and even restarted the information store service. The user is able to receive emails and send them as well. However in Outlook the message still persists that
users quota is 2 GB. Have restarted Outlook several times. Can anyone shed some light why this may be happenning. Also what is the default interval in which the information displayed by Outlok changes after a change at the exchange server?
Ron
Ron

Hi RonMen,
The change of mailbox quota will not reflect in outlook immediately, the update occur every 30 minutes by default.
Updates can be triggered either manually by the user or automatically.
The following user actions will request the server to update the properties :
1. Emptying Deleted Items
2. Emptying a Folder (via the button in the ribbon’s folder tab or right-click on folder)
3. Permanently deleting (shift-delete) an item
4. Closing the Archive / AutoArchive dialogs
There is a more detailed article for your reference:
Mailbox Quota in Outlook 2010 - general information and troubleshooting tips
http://blogs.technet.com/b/outlooking/archive/2013/09/19/mailbox-quota-in-outlook-2010-general-information-and-troubleshooting-tips.aspx
If you have any further questions, please let me know.
Best regards,
Eric

FSCM - Credit - Documented Credit Decision not linking to Sales Document

When a Sales Order is created/changes a credit check occurs and a Documented Credit Decision is created. The issue is that the Documented Credit Decision case does not seem to have a link to the Sales Order from which it was created. When selecting to Check, Release or Reject the Sales Doc from the SCASE screen an error message appears. Does anyone know where I should be looking to resolve? Not sure if this is a config related issue, web service, or a Badi code issue.
These are the errors received when selecting each option (check, release, reject)
Cannot be checked; entry does not relate to sales document
Message no. UKM_DCD_MSG028
Cannot be released, entry does not relate to sales document
Message no. UKM_DCD_MSG029
Rejection not possible; entry does not relate to an SD document
Message no. UKM_DCD_MSG042

Solution: Activate DCD_ACTIVE within BAdI UKM_R3_ACTIVATE

Sales order rejected in ECC does not reflect in APO

Hi Friends,
We are working on ECC6 and APO7.0 for a paper mill- IS Mill functionality. We have MTO ATP with block planning and a exernal trim application. The sales order is rejected in ECC but did not reflect in APO. This has not appeared in daily CCR monitoring also. The order is trimmed, i.e planned for production. I dont see the rejection in APO table: /SAPAPO/SD_DOC Beow are the sequence of events:
-Order rejected 3/25
-Sales order 42678-20 had planned order 587645.
-Planned order 587645 is part of the enquee 4487 that was downloaded to trim on 4/4. Well after the rejection.
Please guide me if there is any way to prevent such occurences, leading to unnecessary planning, blocking of capacities.
Thanks in advance.
Arvind

Arvind,
I haven't worked with SCM when linked to IS_MILL, so I am not speaking from experience. However, I have worked with SCM and ERP Baseline, so I will be speaking from this perspective.
You didn't mention how your GATP is configured, and what planning modules you have implemented in SCM. These facts definitely can have an impact on the supply elements (planned or production orders), and what should/should not happen to these supply orders.
You also didn't mention what indicated to you that the Sales order is inconsistent between the two system. FYI just looking at tables is not a definitive method. The most important bits of information lie in LiveCache.
I don't know what is meant by "Planned order 587645 is part of the enquee 4487 ", so I will assume it is some customized interface, and I will ignore this statement for the moment.
So, I will just make a couple of suggestions as a starting point. If the sales order is actually rejected, it should not appear in R/3 MD04. Does it? If so, run program SDRQCR21 in R/3. The inconsistent order should then disappear from MD04.
If MD04 does not show the sales order (as it shouldn't), but /SAPAPO/RRP3 does show the sales order, then run program /SAPAPO/SDRQCR21 in SCM.
If neither MD04 not //RRP3 currently shows the sales order, then please tell me why you think there is a problem.
Best Regards,
DB49

Exchange rate difference not going to the correct GL account

Hello,
In the transaction OB09, I have given the GL account 702000 for exchange rate difference realized loss and gain.
I have also maintained the exchange rates in the transaction OB08.
In transaction F-44(clear vendor), I give the foreign curreny(EUR) in the entry screen. When I do a charge off difference, however, I need to enter the amount in local currency(USD) because our bank operates in the local currency. When I do a document simulate, it puts the exchange rate difference into another GL account (703030 - that we have defined for unauthorized deductions) and not the one defined for the exchange rate difference(702000). This does not happen if I enter the amount also in the foreign currency.
Could anyone tell me the reason for this and the correction measures.
Any helpful suggestion will be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Rugmani
Edited by: Rugmani Rajan on Aug 27, 2008 11:35 AM

Hello,
The original problem is resolved. The current exchange rate was not getting uploaded to the system and as a result, the old exchange rate was being used. So it was putting the difference into the other account.
That has given rise to another problem. We use the TBEX to upload exchange rates from a centrally maintained spreadsheet. The upload is giving the following errors:
Securities master data EUR do not exist!
Interest rate master data CNY is missing
Suggestions and correction measures will be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Rugmani

AR Down Payment Invoice Does Not Reflect in BP Master Data...

We have placed a sales order for a BP.
We select payment means and accept the payment
In the background a AP Down Payment Invoice is created
When we view the BP master data - the account ballance window does NOT reflect this "down payment"
If we select the golden arrow at account ballance, uncheck "reconciled transactions" you can see the payment and AP down payment and they clear each other out.
The problem is that when the final invoice is created it is not obvious that a down payment has been received. Even if you are simply working at the BP master data window, it is not obvious that a down payment has been received. I belive our process is correct because If you click the TDP box, the payment is listed and will be applied to the final invoice.
It simply does not alert the user that a payment had been received.
What are we doing wrong?????\
Thank you!
Edited by: Andrew Bleier on Feb 4, 2009 1:27 AM

Keith Taylor
You are right this feature is only available in Version 2007A. There account posting happen purely due to the pay SAP has been designed and the configuration of GL Accounts.
To make fundametal change to the core product is very difficult if you explain me your business process exactly as you do, I could think of alternatives.
Please let know.
Suda

Material document 4900000006 does not include an accounting document

Hi guys
I created normal sales order, delivery and and released it thr VF01.
Then I created the RE document without order reference and PGR. But while checking the accounting documents in VL02N it gives the error as follows
Material document 4900000006 does not include an accounting document
Diagnosis
The system cannot find an accounting document for the material document 4900000006.
Possible reasons for this are:
The goods movement has no relevance to accounting. Therefore, the system did not generate an accounting document for the material document.
The material document is a document that was posted before Release 2.1. Such documents must be converted so that the system can find the relevant accounting document.
The procedure for the subsequent calculation of value is not active in your system. For further information, refer to the documentation on the program for valuating goods movements: RM07MWBU.
Procedure
Choose Continue and then choose another function.
Find out when the material document was created. If the document was created prior to the Release changeover, ask your system administrator to carry out the conversion of the documents. The individual steps required for document conversion are described in the Release Notes for Release 2.1B
Please give me the solution
Thanks in advance
Rahul

Hi Rahul,
Can you tell me how did you resolve this error indetail or step by step? I have a same error in test client. I am doing returns with stock catergory of E while PGI and then it throws error message.
Material document 4900000006 does not include an accounting document
Diagnosis
The system cannot find an accounting document for the material document 4900000006.
Possible reasons for this are:
The goods movement has no relevance to accounting. Therefore, the system did not generate an accounting document for the material document.
The material document is a document that was posted before Release 2.1. Such documents must be converted so that the system can find the relevant accounting document.
The procedure for the subsequent calculation of value is not active in your system. For further information, refer to the documentation on the program for valuating goods movements: RM07MWBU.
Procedure
Choose Continue and then choose another function.
Find out when the material document was created. If the document was created prior to the Release changeover, ask your system administrator to carry out the conversion of the documents. The individual steps required for document conversion are described in the Release Notes for Release 2.1B
regards
rc gopi

Ship to party and Bill to party not reflecting in marketing documents

Hi,
Ship to party and Bill to party not reflecting in marketing documents inspite of defining it in BP Master data.why does it happen.we are on 8.8 version and this is happening in Livedatabase.
Thanks,
Mansoor Baig

Hi Mansoor,
Is this for new transactions or existing ones that went thru the 8.8 upgrade? Is this for new BP that the address doesn't show or existing (if you have other transactions with no address problem then it shouldn't be the address format setup unless something happened in the upgrade).
Heather

Output error:the name of the package "greet" does not reflect the location of this file...

output error: The name of package 'greet' does not reflect the location of this file. Please change the package definition's name inside this file, or move the file. C:\Documents and Settings\Igal\My Documents\meiran\greet\Greeter.as
I keep on recieving this output error although my source path is set to C:\Documents and Settings\Igal\My Documents\meiran\greet.
any suggestions why this happens?

The classpaths you define in your Flash software tell the compiler where to look when it needs to find a class. According to your as file, the very top line indicates the Greeter.as file should be at a location specified by the path...
one-of-your-classpaths\com\example\quickstart\
So if one of your classpaths is: C:\Documents and Settings\Igal\My Documents\meiran\greet\
and you placed the file in the greet folder, then in your AS document you should not have the "com\example\quickstart" and your import statement in the fla should not be using that (should just be... import Greeter;)

Exchange rate account not defined

While doing F-04 for a particular bank incoming clearing account, I am getting an error saying : exchange rate account not defined for G/L account and currency INR.
All the postings in the account are in INR and I have also done settings in OBA1 for KDF.
Please help
Thanks

Why would I need to maintain exchange rate settings if all entries are in local currency?
One more observation:
During f-04 clearing, when I toggle between local currency and clearing currency, there is a difference of 25000000.
Any ideas?
Thanks

802.1x accounting does not reflect correct port status

Hi,
I've just discovered an issue when trying to use MSFT supplicant and Cisco 802.1x accounting. This makes 802.1x accounting completely unusable.
Facts:
1. MSFT supplicant does not send EAPOL-Logoff messages and there's no way to enable this (btw. Aegis client does not send it either, except when disabling interface).
2. I am doing machine authentication along with domain authentication.
3. Windows XP SP2 is used with EAP registry hacks applied.
4. PEAP/MS-CHAPv2 method is used.
Now when the computer is started it is logged into 802.1x with 'host/machine' account and RADIUS accounting start is sent by the switch. That's fine.
When a user logs on with its 'domain\user' identity, then EAPOL-Start is sent from the host triggering new EAP message exchange and the user is authenticated correctly. However the switch sends Interim Accounting still using 'host/machine' credentials which is obviously wrong.
Even more bizarre accounting happens when the user subsequently logs off from the machine. The EAPOL-Start is sent from the host triggering new authentication process for 'host/machine' identity and the host is authenticated ok. The accounting being sent is:
- first Accounting Stop for 'host/machine' User-Name
- then strange Interim Accounting with most attributes empty or missing
256970: Jul 10 15:56:41.211 MET-DST: RADIUS: authenticator 68 CA 1A 46 85 4F F5 95 - 87 B4 84 61 72 85 42 F3
256971: Jul 10 15:56:41.211 MET-DST: RADIUS: Acct-Session-Id [44] 10 "013F0000"
256972: Jul 10 15:56:41.211 MET-DST: RADIUS: Vendor, Cisco [26] 34
256973: Jul 10 15:56:41.211 MET-DST: RADIUS: Cisco AVpair [1] 28 "connect-progress=Auth Open"
256974: Jul 10 15:56:41.211 MET-DST: RADIUS: Acct-Session-Time [46] 6 0
256975: Jul 10 15:56:41.211 MET-DST: RADIUS: Acct-Input-Octets [42] 6 0
256976: Jul 10 15:56:41.211 MET-DST: RADIUS: Acct-Output-Octets [43] 6 0
256977: Jul 10 15:56:41.211 MET-DST: RADIUS: Acct-Input-Packets [47] 6 0
256978: Jul 10 15:56:41.211 MET-DST: RADIUS: Acct-Output-Packets [48] 6 0
256979: Jul 10 15:56:41.211 MET-DST: RADIUS: Acct-Authentic [45] 6 RADIUS [1]
256980: Jul 10 15:56:41.211 MET-DST: RADIUS: Acct-Status-Type [40] 6 Watchdog [3]
256981: Jul 10 15:56:41.211 MET-DST: RADIUS: Vendor, Cisco [26] 24
256982: Jul 10 15:56:41.211 MET-DST: RADIUS: cisco-nas-port [2] 18 "FastEthernet0/11"
256983: Jul 10 15:56:41.211 MET-DST: RADIUS: NAS-Port [5] 6 50011
256984: Jul 10 15:56:41.211 MET-DST: RADIUS: NAS-Port-Type [61] 6 Eth [15]
256985: Jul 10 15:56:41.211 MET-DST: RADIUS: Class [25] 27
256986: Jul 10 15:56:41.215 MET-DST: RADIUS: 43 41 43 53 3A 30 2F 32 39 32 66 2F 61 38 31 38 [CACS:0/292f/a818]
256987: Jul 10 15:56:41.215 MET-DST: RADIUS: 30 32 38 2F 35 30 30 31 31 [028/50011]
256988: Jul 10 15:56:41.215 MET-DST: RADIUS: Service-Type [6] 6 Framed [2]
256989: Jul 10 15:56:41.215 MET-DST: RADIUS: NAS-IP-Address [4] 6 10.129.128.40
256990: Jul 10 15:56:41.215 MET-DST: RADIUS: Acct-Delay-Time [41] 6 0
256991: Jul 10 15:56:41.239 MET-DST: RADIUS: Received from id 1646/238 10.129.128.38:1813, Accounting-response, len 20
256992: Jul 10 15:56:41.239 MET-DST: RADIUS: authenticator ED 8E 8B 15 28 5F E4 37 - BF A8 F5 9E 10 43 5E A8
So that the accounting sent from the switch does not reflect current status of the authenticated user on a given port.
How to deal with this issue? Any ideas?
thanks,
robert

Does your radius proxy-table is populated wrong for EAP- SIM users ?

The invoice & excise Invoce s are genrated but does not diplay in Sales Re

Dear Team,
The invoice & excise Invoce s are genrated but does not diplay in Sales Report.(ZMSR ) . then i have go throught the VF02 & enter the invoice no & click the Relese to Accounting the flag but problem is not solve. pl give the correct solution.;

Dear friend
i think there is no problem in releasing to accounts ,
the problem is in accounting document settings.
to solve this first go to pricing procedure , and check all account keys are maintained or not
go to 'VKOA' check g.l a/c assignments for account key.

Exchange rate does not reflect in Sales Document

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for