Exchange server 2007 automatic transfert

Hi all,
I have a strange problem with my Exchange server 2007 : since several days, all my incoming and outcoming mails from Exchange server are automatically transfered to my admin mailbox.
The messages are like "Microsoft Exchange from ..." and I have the original message attached to the email.
I don't find where to disable this option and how it activate alone ... :/
Anyone know this problem ?
Best regards,
Billy
Billy LAILLE

Hi Ed,
Ok you were right.
Journaling was activated for my mailbox under Transport Hub.
Thanks a lot for you help,
Billy
Billy LAILLE

Similar Messages

Exchange Server 2007 / Java issue

We have just upgraded to Exchange Server 2007. We have a couple of web apps that add an appointment automatically to users calendars using HttpClient PostMethod. Since the upgrade this no longer works. Any ideas or suggestions?

Hi,
From your description, I would like to verify the following things for troubleshooting.
1. Were you able to send and receive emails before?
2. What type of email account is configured in Outlook?
3. Please check if you can send and receive emails using OWA.
Best regards,
Amy Wang
TechNet Community Support

Journaling - Exchange Server 2007 Outlook POP Email Account

Hi there,
My current setup:
In Outlook
Account 1: Exchange Server Email Account
Account 2: Other Email accounts using POP setting (Only when outlook is open send/receive emails and used only via outlook)
Email Store -Incoming
Account 1: OST Cache -Inbox Folder
Account 2 :Same as account 1 (Emails are replicated on Exchange Server) so they are available through OWA.
Email Store - Outgoing
Account 1: OST Cache –Sent Folder
Account 2 :Same as account 1 (Emails are replicated on Exchange Server) so they are available through OWA
All emails are stored on Exchange Mailbox.
Now I will need to activate Journaling on Exchange Server 2007.
Will all email be collected in journal (Exchange+POP)?
If not how can this be done?
I will need an automatic way of doing it (maybe using Outlook rules - received/send via a specific account).
This is required as I am planning to implement
GFI Mail Archiver.
Thanks,
Rajiv

Exchange journaling only journals Exchange messages - it is not an Outlook-dependent system, nor does it journal everything that Outlook can access. It is server-side only - messages sent through the Exchange system will be journaled because they hit
the Exchange server; messages sent through POP accounts will not, since they never see the Exchange server.
So, messages you receive in the POP mailbox will not be journaled, but since all messages you send go out through Exchange, they will all be journaled.
Oh, and one more thing you need to know: all messages that are already in your mailbox will not be journaled - Exchange journals what is delivered through the transport system, not what is in the mailboxes already.

Upgrading from SBS 2008 and Exchange Server 2007 and Adding Modest Failover Protection

I haven't seen anyone describe this scenario, so maybe it can't be done, but it seems it should work. Can someone either confirm this is viable or set me straight and tell me it's not wise (and if not, why not).
I currently have SBS 2008 (2008 Server + Exchange Server 2007 + some other components). I use redirected folders so all my user data is stored primarily on the server, and then sync'd with their local harddrives for roaming use and as an additional
backup precaution. I want to upgrade to a modern version of Exchange (don't care too much about the underlying server OS, but seems like a good time to upgrade everything). I also want to improve the reliability for rapid recovery in the event of a system
failure. I have always felt nervous with SBS because it only runs on a single server.
My plan is:
Install Windows Server 2012 Standard on a new server machine
Join that new server to the existing SBS domain and sync the users, etc.
Install Exchange Server 2013 on the new 2012 Server
Migrate the existing Exchange data and account info to the new server
Demote the SBS Server and promote the new server to primary DC
Reformat the old SBS server and install Windows Server 2012 on it too, and join it to the domain as a second DC
Set up DFS Replication and keep all my user data folders between the two servers (so if one server fails, the other can take over, just not automatically like with a cluster)
Install Exchange Server 2013 on the reformatted 2012 Server box (so second instance on the domain) and set it up to sync with the first Exchange Server 2013 via DAG (so if either computer crashes, the other can take over for both Exchange Server and file
services)
Wouldn't that give me a complete slow-response failover system without the need for setting up a cluster (I know a cluster would provide instant failover protection, but I don't need that kind of speed - a manual switchover in the rare event of a server
failure is acceptable for us)? I could do this using cheap hardware for each server, because unless both servers fail at the same time, clients can point to the other server. And because it's not a formal cluster, I don't need to buy anything for a shared
SAN. This seems like such an obvious more cost-effective solution for a small network, I don't understand why this isn't a common approach, which makes me wonder if there is some reason it won't work.
Any suggestions or feedback? Are Redirected Folders still recommended for users on a Server 2012-based domain?
Thanks,
Colin
Colin

Ed, thanks again for your help. OK, so here's my updated plan (I realize I should probably check on some of these pieces on the Server group, instead of this Exchange group).
Constraints/objectives:
None of the machines are truly server grade hardware, but only 5 people on the network, so performance is generally not an issue, unless a given server is just pegged on CPU or HD due to its own internal maintenance tasks and can't respond to user requests.
Haven't seen any problems, since upgrading server from 4GB RAM to 8GB a few years ago.
Not going to buy any new hardware at this time, but do have several unused consumer-grade computers I can deploy as wimpy or moderate servers.
Main issue is to limit repair time in the event of a system failure (instant failover is not required, but want to be able to restore network functions within less than 24 hours in the event of a hardware failure) and minimize time spent on IT
maintenance.
Because of light IT maintenance (not anyone's primary job and we're too small to justify a dedicated IT person or to pay for outside help), almost every touch takes me research and time to re-learn what I haven't done in weeks, months, or years -- so also
want to keep all IT tasks as simple as possible.
We philosophically want to invest now for the next 5 years and avoid ongoing cloud fees (so zero interest in Windows Server Essentials with Exchange Online)
A little nervous about using VM's, just because I never have before, but I do respect that's probably the right way to do many of these things...
Currently I have SBS 2008 (Windows Server 2008 R2, Exchange Server 2007, WSUS 3, all with latest SP's, also includes SharePoint and other stuff, but I don't really care about most of it) on a single 8GB consumer grade system, which functions as a file
server and Exchange server. We use Redirected Folders and Offline files for all users, which works great for us and provides additional file redundancy (if server goes down, all of each user's files are also on their own machine and they can even continue
to work just fine w/o the server, losing only ability to send and receive e-mail). It has been sufficient, but I want to upgrade our version of Exchange and I am nervous that if that current one server fails, it would take me a long time to restore everything
from backup, easily many days, especially if I need to buy any replacement hardware. It is RAID1, so a single drive failure is easy to handle, but that's the only hardware redundancy for the current server.
New Plan:
Install Windows Server 2012 R2 Standard on a new modest machine (16GBR RAM, Core i7, 1TB RAID1 (may upgrade to 3 or 4 TB), 256 GB SSD boot drive, this had been my old personal computer)
Join that new server to the existing SBS domain (2008 R2/Exchange 2007), make it a DC, sync the users, etc.
Install Windows Server 2012 R2 Standard on a wimpy computer (4GB RAM Core i3 processor), leave it as a member server
Install Exchange Server 2013 on the wimpy new 2012 R2 Server (and nothing else, this will be dedicated to Exchange to make the most of such a wimpy machine)
Migrate the existing Exchange data from the old SBS Exchange 2007 server and account info to the new server
(or should I just create new accounts and copy the data from the user end through Outlook -- is that safer and cleaner than attempting any kind of server-level Exchange data migration?)
Demote the old SBS Server and promote the new 16GB server to primary DC. Now it's OK to take the old SBS server off the network.
Reformat the old SBS server and install Windows Server 2012 R2 on it too, and join it to the domain as a second DC (and possibly DCPROMO it to be the main server)
Install Exchange Server 2013 in a VM on the reformatted 2012 R2 Server box (so second instance on the domain for Exchange redundancy) and set it up to sync with the first Exchange Server 2013 via DAG OR set up another physical wimpy member server and install
it there. In any case, do NOT install Exchange directly on either DC.
Set up DFS Replication or a Failover Cluster (still need to research this, but I had planned on DFS, thinking Cluster required shared drive, but Ed corrected me on this) between the two DC's for redirected files and keep all my user data folders between
the two servers. We don't need automatic failover, like with a cluster, a manual switch would be acceptable, but if no additional cost or risk to clustering the two DC's, then the auto-failover protection that provides would be better than DFS.
I think this incorporates all of your points, Ed. Does this sound right now? What's your advice on #5 (how to best migrate user data)?
Thanks so much for all your help,
Colin

Is there a way to sync Pre-MS Exchange Server 2007 (Service Pack 1) Calendar?

Hello all,
I think my company must be using Pre-Microsoft Exchange Server 2007 with Service Pack 1 for our exchange server, because
I can only set up company Exchange account on MS Entourage, not the new Outlook
I can only set up the same exchange account only on iPad and iPhone (able to view in Mail, Calendar, Contacts & Reminders)
But
I am unable to use Lion's Mail, iCal and Address Book to see my Exchange account
For the moment, I am not really concern about mail and addresses,
but can I see my Exchange calendar on my desktop iCal? How do I set it up?
I guess the most obvious and straight forward way, for now, is to view on my iPad :-) But it is really funny that the iDevices are backward compatible but yet Lion OS cannot...
Thanks and cheers.

Hi,
Yes it will work, it says enterprise because it works there as well.
Thanks
Bifocals
Click Accept as Solution for posts that have solved your issue(s)!
Be sure to click Like! for those who have helped you.
Install BlackBerry Protect it's a free application designed to help find your lost BlackBerry smartphone, and keep the information on it secure.

Provisiong of users from OIM to Exchange Server 2007

Hi,
I am trying to Provisioning the users from OIM 9.1.0.1 to Exchange server 2007. For this i used Exchange Server Connector 9.1.1.1.0. By using AD_Base_connector 9.1.1.0.0 i can
provisioned the user details. But while provisioning to the Exchange server 2007 i am getting the following error
ERROR [XELLERATE.WEBAPP],Class/Method: tcLookupFieldAct ion/lookupByColumn encounter some problems: lookup Error in OIM
And i am unable to get the LookUp detais for the MailBox in Design Console as well as in the ScheduleTasks in OIM Admin Console..
Can anybody help me in solving this issue.
Thanks & Regards
SRI

Hi suren,
i am using the Remote Manager. I enabled logs in log.properties in both OIM server and Remote Manager.
I am observing the following message in Remote Manager command prompt.
DEBUG,30 Mar 2010 01:12:44,437,[XELLERATE.REMOTEMANAGER],Class/Method: RMISSLCli
entSocketFactory/createSocket left.
and i am getting the error in Weblogic server command prompt.
Running ISADAM
Target Class = java.lang.String
Running GETATTRIBUTEHASH
Target Class = com.thortech.xl.util.adapters.tcUtilHashTableOperations
Running Set User Attributes
ERROR,30 Mar 2010 01:13:39,484,[XELLERATE.WEBAPP],Class/Method: tcLookupFieldAct
ion/lookupByColumn encounter some problems: lookup Error
can u help me in resolving this issue.
Thanks in Advance,
SRI

MimeMessage.reply() issue with MS Exchange Server 2007 Emails

I have an application that retrieves emails from an MS Exchange Server 2003 mailbox. The data from each message is read, validated and conditionally loaded to a table. If the message doesn't pass validation, a rejection email is sent back to the sender with an error message and a copy of the email. (We're using Java 1.5. However, I test with both 1.5 and 1.6.)
Also, if the message passes validation, positive notification is sent back to the sender.
Both processes use the method: javax.mail.Message.reply()It's coded as:
MimeMessage reply = (MimeMessage) message.reply(false);My organization is in the process of migrating to MS Exchange Server 2007. We've found that the reply() method no longer finds the sender method, thus unable to create a reply message. The error message we receive is:
javax.mail.SendFailedException: No recipient addresses
     at javax.mail.Transport.send0(Transport.java:110)
     at javax.mail.Transport.send(Transport.java:80)
     at org.ccci.gms.datacollector.DataCollector.sendReply(DataCollector.java:514)
     at org.ccci.gms.datacollector.DataCollector.processMessages(DataCollector.java:162)
     at org.ccci.gms.datacollector.DataCollector.main(DataCollector.java:101)After creating the MimeMessage object from the reply() method, I printed out the email header detail from both 2003 and 2007 messages. You'll note from below that the "To" or recipient address is missing from Server 2007.
MS Exchange 2003 works fine
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Report
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>MS Exchange 2007 no longer works
From: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Reports
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>I know I could just use the "addRecipient()" method to get around this problem. I wanted to know if anyone has encountered this issue. Please share the resolution. Any suggestions will be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
LaelW

When the original message is accessed using IMAP, the reply method uses the information in the
IMAP ENVELOPE to determine where to send the reply. It first looks for the Reply-To address
in the ENVELOPE, then the From address.
Interestingly, when not using IMAP, the getFrom method returns the Sender header if the From
header is empty. The IMAP-specific code doesn't do that, although perhaps it should.
It would be interesting to compare the ENVELOPE data from the protocol trace in the two cases.
The ENVELOPE data will follow this syntax:
envelope     = "(" env-date SP env-subject SP env-from SP
          env-sender SP env-reply-to SP env-to SP env-cc SP
          env-bcc SP env-in-reply-to SP env-message-id ")"
So it's the first three address fields after the Subject that are relevant. If the From and Reply-To
fields are NIL, but the Sender field has a valid address, let me know. I should probably fix the
IMAP provider to fall back to the Sender field if the From field is missing.

Need Documentation on how to intehrate Exchange server 2007 with SAP portal

hi,
i need some documentation on how to integrate microsoft Exchange server 2007 with SAP portal.
can anybody help?

Hi Payel,
Pls check the links below..
<a href="http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/7a/ec015c8446d447a83776d40f31c84f/content.htm">Link</a>
Note : As specified in the document, only the following versions of Microsoft Exchange server are supported:
● Exchange Server 2000
● Exchange Server 2003
Regards,
Venkat.

How to setup microsoft outlook 2011 with exchange server 2007

How to setup microsoft outlook 2011 for Mac with Exchange server 2007?

The folks who set up the Exchange Server should be happy to help you.

M4E with N73 - MS Exchange server 2007

Hi Guys,
maybe I am stupid, but I can't seem to get this thing to work,
I have installed mail for exchange 2.3, finally the security setting is showing, I have approved the certificate but still I am getting the very general :
"Error in Exchange server. try again later."
to explain my steps:
1. configure the connection to use the HSDPA/Cellular link.
2. hostname: owa.domain.com , username and password.
server is Exchange server 2007 and configured behind an ISA server. OWA 2007 from a browser works fine.
please any assistance would be great, I don't even know how to approach it anymore.
thanks in advance,
Badsyntax (Simon)

Hi Imran,
As per my information Webcenter Suite 10.1.3.2 does not have any direct integration capability with MS Exchange Server due to DEEP LINK LIMITATION. Only possible work around is go for External Application SSO registration and then render that URL in IFRAME.
As far as WEBCENTER INTERACTION is concerned i think its seprately licensed and eventhough it's free you need extra Hardware to Install and Configure.
Regards,
Vindhyachal Sharma

HELP - Exchange Server 2007 Transport Rule Issue

Hi all,
sorry if here is not the place to put my question but I did not find another forum, so if anyone can help me I appreciate.
- I have an Exchange Server 2007 SP3 environment with 1 MBX Server and 3 CAS/HUB Servers.
- I have created a Transport Rule that said:
"all emails that have @test.com in BCC field are dropped off except one group can send" .
The issue is the rule doesn´t work.
Anyone can help me, please?
Thanks in advance.
Luiz

The Exchange previous versions forums are here:
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/category/exchangeserverlegacy
Ed Crowley MVP "There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems."

Backup Issue of exchange server 2007 mailbox store

Dears
Exchange server 2007 with CCR clustering
I have got a problem with the backup of one of my mailbox store. Its going till the last and giveing the final error as follows:-
V-79-57344-65247 - A failure occurred reading an object.
Also the warning as follows:-
Backup- \\mailserver.domain\Microsoft Information Store\First Storage Group
WARNING: "\\mailserver.domain\Microsoft Information Store\First Storage Group\Database" is a corrupt file. This file cannot verify.
Backup V-79-57344-34108 - An unexpected error occurred when cleaning up snapshot volumes. Confirm that all snapped volumes are correctly resynchronized with the original volumes.
Does it mean my information store is really a corrupted file. It has been properly monted and logs are genearting.
Even when I checked the last full backedup log file from the management shell it clearly shows the backing up is properly happened on the log files.
When I checked the event log of Exchnage server I can see these logs:-
Event ID 401, 403 errors
The size of the problem store is 308 GB.
One of the other store with 46 GB is backing up without any issue

Hi,
If you have a space issue with the Exchange server, you can upgrade drives on active node and passive node one by one. It is not recommended to upgrade them at the same time.
For more information about upgrading Exchange 2007 CCR active node or passive node, here are some helpful threads for your reference.
Upgrade hard drives on passive node. Process and procedure
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/exchange/en-US/08b9e893-87c9-48c3-bab2-91027cc09949/upgrade-hard-drives-on-passive-node-process-and-procedure?forum=exchangesvravailabilityandisasterrecoverylegacy
Upgrading hard drives in exchange server
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/exchange/en-US/0e4514f9-76da-44d2-9dec-a3be5add79b1/upgrading-hard-drives-in-exchange-server?forum=exchangesvravailabilityandisasterrecoverylegacy
Hope it helps.
Best regards,
Amy
Amy Wang
TechNet Community Support

Hidden Contact Subfolders are visible on iPhone after sync with Exchange Server 2007

Hello,
We have encountered an issue where synchronizing the iPhone with Contacts from an Exchange Server 2007 mailbox, causes hidden contact subfolders (from Outlook) to be visible and appear in the Groups list in the Contacts App on the iPhone. This does not occur with Exchange Server 2010 mailboxes.
We have a 3rd party application that creates hidden subfolders in the default Contacts folder on Exchange Server 2007 mailboxes. The hidden folders do not display in the Outlook client, Blackberry or on an Android phone. We did see that they were showing up in Outlook Web Access until we applied this Microsoft Exchange Server 2007 Service Pack 3 Rollup 2 patch unto the Exchange server:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2210042 - A sub contact folder is still visible after you set the "PR_ATTR_HIDDEN" attribute to "True" in an Exchange Server 2007 environment.
After the patch was applied, the hidden contacts do not show up anywhere else. However, when we synced the mailbox to an iPhone and synced existing contacts, all of the hidden folders appear in the Contact Groups list. Is there a way to hide the hidden sub contact folders on the iPhone and prevent them from appearing in the Contact Group lists?
Any help provided would be most appreciated.
Thanks and Best Regards

Hi SBuchan,
I have an open case with Microsoft about it. It is an issue with ActiveSync in Exchange 2007 that sends the hidden objects. Microsoft tried to resolve this in Exchange 2010 by sending a delete message after sending the hidden objects to remove them from the device. Am awaiting to see if they will approve a design change to Exchange 2007 ActiveSync to prevent the synching of hidden objects.

Exchange Server 2007 shows email as "Receive" but not "Deliver"

Hi Guys
We have Exchange Server 2007 inside of a SBS 2008 set up.
One specific email from a regular sender wasn't received by the recipient. The recipient is used to receiving messages from this sender and the email is not hiding within Outlook.
Exchange 2007 mail tracker shows the email was received, but that's it. Nothing has happened to the email after that. Normally we'd see a "Deliver" report, or possibly a "Fail", but always something to show the email has been actioned
in some way.
The queues are all empty.
So, this one email has disappeared into the ether of Exchange! So far as I can see, this is the only email with only a "Receive" notification. All others have something else immediately following the Receive.
The Server has GFI anti-spam installed, but that hasn't seen the email either, because emails are collected by Exchange before being passed to GFI. In this instance it hasn't been passed, or returned to the sender as undeliverable. It just seems
to have been eaten.
Would anyone have any sensible suggestions on where to start kicking this email back into life?

Hi Simon
Apologies for the late response, but I only get to this client once a month.
1. Did the sender get NDR? ~ No
2. Let the receiver check the email via OWA and see
whether the email is available. ~ Still not available
3. Use MFCMAPI to check the user mailbox, can you
find the missing email? ~ I haven't yet worked out what is MFCMAPI or how to use it to check, but I suspect that as the Exchange email tracker doesn't have any actions after "Receive" that it cannot have sent the email on to the user's mailbox or rejected
the email as non-deliverable.
The client isn't too willing to expend too much effort
/ cost on this issue which does appear to be a one-off glitch, but I am interested in resolving it for myself as I haven't heard of this problem before.
Thanks for the interest,
Michael D

Exchange server 2007 SP3

Dear all,
Presently we are using exchange server 2007 Sp3 along with windows 2008 x64 Domain controller it's working fine . But we have some issue related with
Message Size restriction when I changed maximum msg size sent and receive this option will applied to the mail box user taking long time how can i update this option immediately to the end users ?
Best Regards
Subash

Hi,
After you configure the mailbox size restriction for a mailbox, the configured limits are enforced after a period of time, but do not take effect immediately. Restarting the Microsoft Exchange Information Store service causes the configured limits to take
effect immediately.
Please restart the Microsoft Exchange Information Store service to check result.
Here is a related article about this issue for your reference.
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb684892(v=exchg.80).aspx
Best regards,
Belinda Ma
TechNet Community Support

Exchange server 2007 automatic transfert

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for