Excise invoice date should be equal to GR Posting date in MIGO (Part1 cap.)

Hi,
My client wants to have a date validation of "Excise invoice date should always be equal to GR Posting date" in MIGO (Part1 capturing)" whenever they do Goods receipt for excisable transactions.
As per SAP standard the system will display an error message whenever excise invoice date is greater than GR posting date in MIGO while capturing Part1.
But system will not display any error message when Excise invoice date is less than GR posting date. My question is why the system will allow to post the MIGO with part 1 entries when Excise invoice date is less than GR posting date.
Is there any BADI/User exits to put the validation of  "Excise invoice date should always be equal to GR Posting date" (while capturing part1 in MIGO).
Also, after implementing this date validation in the SAP system,  any serious impact to business with excise department (Indian excise scenario).
Please help....
Thanks & Regards,
Pavan
Edited by: cn_pavan on Aug 18, 2009 4:47 AM

hi
check whether any std user exit there for this process and code as per your logic and activate it

Similar Messages

  • MIRO Posting Date should be greater than GRN posting Date

    Dear Expert,
    My MIRO posting Date 01.10.2010 and GRN posting Date 10.10.2010. How do I  restrict or validate this criteria?
    Regards,
    PK.

    hi
    you have to go for BADI for  posting date check
    take help of the abaper
    check note
    Note 1156325 - BAdIs in the Logistics Invoice Verification environment
    regards
    kunal

  • MIRO Baseline Date should be same as GRN posting date.

    Dear sir.
    While doing MIRO, the Baseline date should come default date as GRN posting Date. who i can achieve this.
    Because in payment terms, the default baseline date is 1)no default 2)document date3)posting date4)entry date is there.with is it will not come.
    if any user exit or BADI is there Pl send sir.
    regards
    jayareddy

    Hi
    Base Line Date
    Not possible bt std sap.
    Vijay
    Edited by: Vijay on Apr 27, 2009 1:41 PM

  • How to set Service render date should be equal to Billing date

    Hi All,
    At present when invoice is created the service rendered date (FBUDA) is taken as the basis for the Rebate condition types to select the condition value from the agreement.
    The business requires that for the rebate conditions, service rendered date should be equivalent to the billing date, so that correct agreement is selected based on the billing date.
    Required Change: Service Rendered date should be equivalent to the Billing Date for only Rebate condition Types and only for particular Sales Org.
    To achieve this how can I proceed, I have gone through all user-exist for billing no where I have found
    Could you please guide me to achieve this functionality?
    Thanks and Regards,
    Jaya.G

    Hi Yadav,
    My requirement is to put the billing date in service render date
    I.e. in my scenario the Actual GI date is populating into billing date and also in service render date (komk-fbuda)
    If we enter billing date manually while creating the billing that should be reflect in service render date, in condition level.
    Here it is not happening, it is taking the Actual GI date in service render date,
    Here VBRP-FBUDA is different form komk-fbuda.
    Vbrp-fbuda is have to reflect form Actual GI date only
    My requirement is, I need to populate the billing date into service render date for some conditions only. These conditions are rebate type conditions.
    I can populate the billing date to all conditions not for particular conditions
    In user exit userexit_pricing_prepare_tkomk
    I can move the vbrk-fkdat to tkomk-fbuda
    But this not my requirement
    I need to populate the billing date to service render date to some conditions types only
    In this exit I canu2019t restrict the conditions, I mean in this routine I am not able to select the condition types
    Please advice me where can I write the code to achieve my functionality
    Thanks in Advance
    Jaya.G

  • Need By Date Should be equal or after the effective start date- error in po_requisitions_interface_all

    Hi All,
    We have created a manual planned order for one buy item in ASCP workbench for some qty and released it.
    But, we are not able to get its requisition created in source.
    When we check the PO_Interface _Errors table, we found that it is errored out with error as --
    Need By Date Should be equal or after the effective start date .
    Can anyone please help me out to find the cause of this issue. Any help/pointer in this regard will be highly appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Avinash

    Hi Abhishek,
    We found the root cause of the issue.
    Its BPA was not having any Effective start date mentioned in its terms. So we put it as BPA creation date and ran the data collection and plan run.
    After that we were able to see its BPA release created without any error.
    Thanks,
    Avinash

  • Commercial & Excise invoice no Should be same.

    Hi,
    i want that my commercial invoice & Excise invoice no should be same.
    How to achieve this?
    any negative effects of this?
    Regards,
    Amol

    While you can try with maintaining the same object of SAP billing document number range in SNUM also so that the same number range may flow.
    But as you would be aware SAP billing document is a continuous process and each and every year, you cannot  change to match the excise invoice.  In this case, how are you going to handle ??  Obviously, I would not recommend to maintain like that
    thanks
    G. Lakshmipathi

  • Excise Invoice UOM should Post Based on Chapter ID

    Hi All,
    Greeting for the day!!!
    We have a requirement, like Billing document create in Uom like EA. But Chapter Id for that materials are like KG.
    When I create excise invoice UoM Should post in KG's.
    for this what we have to do.
    Please do needfull.
    Thanks and regards,
    Prasad.

    Hi Laxmipathi,
    Thanks for your quick reply.
    I will try this and let you know.
    Regards,
    Prasad

  • Excise Invoice Tab should not open at GRN

    Hello all,
    I am trying to procure assets with account assignment A and without material code. I am using 0% tax.  We also do not have any records in J1ID tcode.
    However, during GRN the Excise invoice tab is opening up.
    One way to get around at GRN is to use " no excise entry". But this tab should not be opening at all.
    Can you guess what configuration, if any, might be making the system propose excise for the PO. The PO item is not excisable in fact.
    Thanks and regards,
    Soumyadeep

    Hi,
    If you using asset PO without material master with a vendor. Now if you do not want excise TAB should come in MIGO, then remove vendor number in J1ID t.code and then do GR.
    If you want to enter excises details , then you should slect check box of "Duty different at GR" check box selected ( so that you can entry manually the excises value in MIGO screen) in MIGO Setting segment in Maintaining Excise Group setting in following path
    SPRO ->>Logistics general ->> tax on Goods Movements-->>India -->> Basic setting -->>Maintain Excise Groups
    NOTE:
    If you want Excise fields are should not be open, then you DO NOT should select check box of "Duty different at GR" in the above path. But think what about Dealer Invoice Scenarios.
    Regards,
    Biju K

  • AR Invoice date should not be less than delivery date

    How can i make an alert for user when they will prepare AR Invoice?
    Example:
    If Delivery date is 01-10-2010 and Invoice date should be later or same but not less than delivery date(01-10-2010).
    if Invoice date is less than delivery date then This data should not be added into the database.
    So there is any way to stop this error.
    Thanks
    Mizan

    Dear Bala,
    Here is the SP:
    set ANSI_NULLS ON
    set QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON
    go
    ALTER proc [dbo].[SBO_SP_PostTransactionNotice]
    @object_type nvarchar(20),                     -- SBO Object Type
    @transaction_type nchar(1),               -- [A]dd, <u>pdate, [D]elete, [C]ancel, C[L]ose
    @num_of_cols_in_key int,
    @list_of_key_cols_tab_del nvarchar(255),
    @list_of_cols_val_tab_del nvarchar(255)
    AS
    begin
    -- Return values
    declare @error  int                    -- Result (0 for no error)
    declare @error_message nvarchar (200)           -- Error string to be displayed
    select @error = 0
    select @error_message = N'Ok'
    --     ADD     YOUR     CODE     HERE
    If @object_type='13' and @transaction_type='A'
    BEGIN
    If Exists (Select distinct 'error' from [dbo].[OINV] T0 Inner Join INV1 T1
    On T0.DocEntry=T1.DocEntry Inner Join DLN1 T2 On T1.BaseEntry=T2.DocEntry
    Where T0.DocDate<T2.DocDate
    And T0.DocEntry = @list_of_cols_val_tab_del)
    BEGIN
    Select @error = -1,
    @error_message = 'DocDate for Invoice Should not be Less than Del. Date. So You can not Add this Doc'
    End
    End
    -- Select the return values
    select  @error,@error_message
    end
    Regards,
    Mizan

  • Commercial Invoice and Excise Invoice number should be same

    Hi Friends,
    I want to know whether is it possible to maintain same number for commercial and excise invoice.
    If yes then how to do?
    Do i have any impact in other areas?
    Thanks&Regards
    Azeez.Mohd

    Hi,
    In that case you can make use of MV45AFZZ user exit.
    Use the MOVE_FIELD TO VBAK_VBAP exit.
    In this exit, get the corresponding excise invoice number and year (by using Delivery / Proforma as reference From VBRK / J_1iEXCHDR ) tables and concatenate it.
    As excise invoice has document number and year.. You can make the billing document number as the concatenation of these two and move to VBAK-VBELN.
    As you already move the value to VBAK-VBELN, system will not pick up the the number range that is assigned for the billing document.
    Regards,
    Sai
    Edited by: sai srinivas on May 14, 2009 12:35 PM

  • Comparing dates (Start date should not be later than End date etc ...)

    Hello All,
      I have a table (5 rows) with 7 columns. Of which the first to columns are the start date and the end date. Can someone kindly advise on how I can go about to ensure that there is some validation mechanism in place such that the start date is not later than the end date and vice versa ? Thank you very much.
    from
    Kwok Wei

    Hi
      Use calculated attributes as Pran suggested. It should work. Where are you getting the data from. Is it from R/3. The node bound to the table ui element is it a model node. Anyway Here is the link on how to use the calculated attribute.
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/7f/a0384162316532e10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm
    regards
    ravi

  • Delivery date should be equal to basline date

    Hi,
    I have created PO on 2nd and delivery taken place on 5th , IR is taken place on 7th.  Right now i want my baseline date in inoice is should be 5th as delivery date.  please help me in this.

    The base line date gets defaulted based on the payment terms , this is standard.
    If you want the delivery date as the base line date , then you need to use an Enhancement or BAdi to acheive the same.

  • Default date should be displayed in Locale's date short format in Prompt

    Dear BI Gurus,
    I would like to take your attention to resolve one of date format issue which we are currently facing.
    We want to display Current_Date in locale's date short format ( For US: MM/DD/YYYY and for UK: DD/MM/YYYY) in a dashboard prompt. Also we need to pass the the prompt value to the report filter through presentation variable.
    For this we used logical sql to get the default value as select Times.time_id from sh when times.time_id= Current_Date. Once I click on the preview button it was showing in locale's date short format. But when we place the prmpt in dashboard, the default date was coming up in 'YYYY-MM-DD' format. But since calendar picker is giving value in locale's date short format (For US: MM/DD/YYYY and for UK: DD/MM/YYYY), there is an inconsistency in the display format. So could you please provide any workaround to make them consistent.
    Thnaks,
    Siva Naga Hari.
    Edited by: user6371352 on 27-Mar-2010 13:50

    Hi Vinay,
    Thanks for reply.
    We are looking for default date display format in dashboard prompt. i.e For US locale, default date and calendar picker should be displayed in MM/DD/YYYY and for UK locale, default and Calendar picker should be displayed in DD/MM/YYYY.
    We don't have any problem in report output for different locales. Also we don't need to create 2 seperate reports for different locales. If we set the data format to [FMT:dateShort], it will display as per the locale's date short format. Please provide workaround to display in dashboard prompt.
    Thanks,
    Siva Naga Hari.

  • Date should not be  less than current date.

    Hello, I have a form.It has an item called end_date. I want to have validation of end_date in such a way that "end_date should not less than current date". Any tips would be helpful.
    Thanks in advance.

    jwellsnh wrote:
    Pravish,
    A dynamic action executing JavaScript can do this:
    Create a Dynamic Action:
    Event Before Page Submit
    Condition JavaScript Expression
    Value $v('P1_END_DATE')<$v('P1_BEGIN_DATE')In this scenario; P1_BEGIN_DATE would need to default to sysdate and could be a hidden item on the page.
    Jeff
    Edited by: jwellsnh on Jul 19, 2012 9:50 AMMaybe I'm missing something but isn't this just a use case for a common-or-garden validation? Would be interested to know why you thought of javascript rather than normal built-in functionality (not meant as a criticism incidentally!) - is javascript your first port of call when it comes to APEX?
    I'd also watch out for comparisons to SYSDATE - remember that SYSDATE includes the current time, so you'd need to take that into account (maybe you could make use of the TRUNC function to remove the time element?). Indeed, would javascript evaluate that expression as comparing two dates (I know Javascript evaluates variables byDuck Typing but does this work in practice)?

  • Actual dates should not impact the Network scheduled dates

    Hi
    I have planned schdeuled dates (Early/latest).
    When i am confirming the activity the actual dates get updated
    When i schedule the network the scheduled planned dates are recalulated
    This should not happen for this client i am working for
    The requirement is that the Planned Scheduled should remain fixed and
    should only change if duration, relationship etc changes.
    I have tried different option to solve this but still no clue
    Adjust basic date 1, 2, 3 option
    Shift Order
    No date Update - this seems to work but not visible in CN22/CN25/CJ20n
    Kindly highlight if any of you have come with similar requirement & provided solution to it
    Either thru standard functionality, configuration or any development
    Cheers

    Hi Manoj,
    I had the same requirement and able to achieve it by std. settings. Keep in mind that the planned dates wil get changed when you do the final confirmation. You should have the control on the planned dates until the activity get Fianlly confirmed.
    psconsultant

Maybe you are looking for