Excise mandatory

Hi,
While making GR, if the PO is having excise duty applicable, we have to capture excise invoice before posting GR.The item is checked for capturing excise invoice.If somebody selects NO EXCISE ENTRY while Gr creation, system allows to proceed further. This should not be allowed.How?
Regards,
Sattuj

Hi,
If you want to capture the excise invoice at the time ofGRN only then you have do customization & disable 'No excise entry' option from MIGO screen. But this option is provided to enable the user to post the GRN if excise documents are not clear.
However I think you may capture & post excicse invoice with reference to the GRN document (after the GRN is posted) through transaction J1IEX.
Regards,
Prashant Kolhatkar.

Similar Messages

J1ID vendor excise details mandatory

Dear All
is it possible to make mandatory in the fields Ecc no,PAN no,Vendor excise region,in J1id under vendor excise details is it possible in SAP standard field selection..
Regards
Anand.

Standard SAP does not provide this option , however you can check with SHD0 or you will have to make some customized changes for the same.
Regards,
Akhileshwar K

Mandatory Excise Group in Order (Urgent)

Hi,
I need to make it mandatory to select respective Plant / Excise Group / Series only, so that no-body can select other plant except the respective document.
Rgds

the scenario is as follows:
there r different depots for which difeerent Excise groups & different series groups are maintained.
now while doing J1IJ i m putting delivery no, excise group, but i can select any series group from the list, which i dont want......
It must only be possible to select the series group defined for the particular plant.
And plant(Depo) is having only one series group not two hence how cud ur sugesstion be mapped as it has only one series group assigned
And when in J1IJ i enter any series group which is assigned to other plant it takes that too and i dont wanna that to happen.
I understand what u r saying is to diffrentiate the series groups as "Domestic" and "ARE1". but in my case the plant is used as a depo and there's only one series group assigned to it.
Thanks in advance for all ur help and time
Rgds
Edited by: SAP SD GUY on Apr 15, 2008 9:36 AM

In excise invoice data , MRP indicator needs to be made mandatory

Friends,
While doing GRN, in more data for excise invoice, I would like to make the field MRP indicator mandatory. Can any body help me to make this happen?
regards,ebenezer

Hi Ramesh
In copy control VTFL for NL->F8, I made the copying requirement at header as '003' ( replacing 009 as was the original).
-Also,as per earlier suggestion, I changed the Copying requirement at Item level ..i.e for NLN to 034 ( replacing 010 as was original).
Next I ran the cycle
a) Created a PO. ..ME21n
b) Created replenishment delivery .VL10B
c)Picked the Delivery Quantity ..VL02n
d) Tried ..Generating Proforma invoice .of .type F8 .in VF01 . It didn't allow.
This was fine and satisfy my requirement of not being allowed to do invoicing before PGI.
Next ....
e) Did PGI for that delivery.
f) Tried to generate proforma invoice ..type F8 . But the system is not allowing me to do so.
Processing status-Incorrect.
Error log..The document is not relevant for invoicing.
What is the way out?
(As a fyi..without the changes I did in copy control, I was able to generate Proforma invoice after PGI.earlier)

Excise Tax Code mandatory in Purchase Request

Hi Experts
In Purchase Request or Purchase Order if user chooses Excisable item and Excise Warehouse SAP is not allowing to add without selecting excise Tax code. What is the Purpose of doing this validation at Purchase Request Level. Since user might not aware of tax code. If there any way to by-pass it.
Regards
Karunakaran P.

Hi Joseph
Thanks for your reply. this may be work around solution but what is the purpose of selecting excise tax code in purchase request.
One more thing how can we set the default tax code for purchase request document. i have tried following
1. Tax Code determination
2. No option for form settings default tax code in purchase request
3. Tried with user defaults.
all the above attempts were failed.
Is there any other possible way to achieve this?
Regards
Karunakaran P.

Mandatory miro must be done after excise posting

hi expert
i required validation/userexit that will not allowed user to do miro until excise posting is done.
i want this case to happen if material is excisale or excise capture is thr for migo.
Remark.
if sometime material excisable, we dont do excise capture or posting.
Regard
Nabil

hi,
Please set this message as error message in (8I 478 )
CIN cutomizing ->SPRO->logistics general->taxes on goods movement ->India-> tools-> message control
here put application area 8I message no 478 t code MIRO and set as Error
( if this message not exist please make new entries and set as error )
It will serve your purpose .. without validation and user exit ( as it is standard in CIN)
Check and revert

How do we raise Incoming Excise invoice on Vendor1 and A/P Invoice on Vendo

Hi All,
How do we raise Incoming Excise invoice on Vendor1 and A/P Invoice on Vendor2 for a single purchase order?
The Scenario: PO is raised on Vendor2 for certain goods excisable and Vendor2 is not registered under Excise hence i cannot get Incoming excise invoice from Vendor2 or I cannot raise Excise invoice in B1 on the name of Vendor2.
But
the same goods (which are excisable) were already supplied by Vendor1 to Vendor2. So here the excise invoice is coming from Vendor1 and A/P Invoice from Vendor2 how this is actually handled in Business One? How do we show the A/P Invoice amount due on Vendor2 and the Excise Passed from Vendor1?
Thanks
SV Reddy

Hi Thanga Raj,
what you said is works only for payment consolidation. where in a particular purchase two vendors are involved, the tax updates should go into relevant vendor master data. in the above case excise is updated in the vendor1 account and RG23 also should be generated on the name of Vendor1.
Since you already raising incoming excise invoice on the name of Vendor1 you also need to raise A/P Invoice on Vendor1 (this is mandatory, from the goods receipt PO when you click copy to Incoming Excise Invoice and A/P Invoice the system automatically inserts "Vendor1")
but how do you update the Vendor2 account only for the A/P Invoice VAT portion. Because in reality the VAT you are paying to Vendor2 since you need to raise the a/P Invoice on the name of Vendor2. it is not actually happening in business one. If you try to raise A/P Invoice on Vendor2 from this Goods Receipt PO, initially the system copies Vendor1 from GRPO and if you change and try to add the invoice on Vendor2 name, the system will ask you to create a serial number again if the item is excisable. here the work is duplicated for the same item you already created a serial number while you creating the Goods Rectipt PO from Vendor1.
Any body knows any other scenario please help me.
Thanks
SV Reddy

Excise base value is not changing in MIGO excise tab for Import PO scenari

Dear Gururs,
We are using MIGO to capture & Post Excise Invoice for our Import PO (PO type ZIMP). the problem is, when we change the qty in MIGO Qty tab, corresponding base value is not getting update in Excise tab. we are not creating the planned cost mIRO directly we do the GRN.
Please suggest a solution.
Thanks
Shital

Hello Shital ,
You are using the India Scenario right?
The issue can be because you have not assigned a zero tax code to the line item. For India please make the tax code field in PO as mandatory so that the user does not save the PO without atleast a zero tax code.
Maintain the tax code & proceed. You will see the tab in MIGO.
Regards
Plauto

In STO process , PGI to be made mandatory

I wish to make PGI mandatory for STO process..Steps are as follows:
-Create PO.-.ME23n
-Create Replenishment Delvery -VL10B
-Do PGI -.VL02n>PGI
-Create Proforma Invoice-VF01
-Create Excise -J1iin
In order to achieve that , in VTFL copy control for NL to F8 , I changed Copying Req ( at header) to 003 from 009.
But somehow I am not able to create proforma invoice VF01 ...even after doing PGI.
Message is that there is no delivery related items.

Hi Ramesh
In copy control VTFL for NL->F8, I made the copying requirement at header as '003' ( replacing 009 as was the original).
-Also,as per earlier suggestion, I changed the Copying requirement at Item level ..i.e for NLN to 034 ( replacing 010 as was original).
Next I ran the cycle
a) Created a PO. ..ME21n
b) Created replenishment delivery .VL10B
c)Picked the Delivery Quantity ..VL02n
d) Tried ..Generating Proforma invoice .of .type F8 .in VF01 . It didn't allow.
This was fine and satisfy my requirement of not being allowed to do invoicing before PGI.
Next ....
e) Did PGI for that delivery.
f) Tried to generate proforma invoice ..type F8 . But the system is not allowing me to do so.
Processing status-Incorrect.
Error log..The document is not relevant for invoicing.
What is the way out?
(As a fyi..without the changes I did in copy control, I was able to generate Proforma invoice after PGI.earlier)

Problem in export excise invoice under bond

Dear Gurus,
I am creating excise invoice for export under bond, in T-code J1iin, in utilization tab when i change to export invoice then it became mandatory for deemed export while i set it for under bond by following path
maintained in IMG Path -- Logistics-General --> Tax on Goods Movements --> India --> Business Transactions --> Outgoing Excise Invoice --> Maintain Default Excise Group and Series Group.
For that series group,excise group,sales area, plant,shipping point, I maintained Export under bond
But still problem is there.
Please give me solution
Thanks & Regards

Hello Rajesh,
While creating excise invoice for export excise invoice if duty values are getting nullified after selecting
utilization TAB, excise invoice type BOND, then kindly use the user exit J_1I7_USEREXIT_DUTY_IN_EXPORT
here pass the suppress calculation = X. So duty values will get copied from the billing document. If it is left
blank system will recalculate duty while creating excise invoice.
Best Regards
MBS

RG23A Part -1 Excise Entry At the time of Issuance !!

HI,
If I am issuing excisable material at shop floor with movement type 201 in t code MIGO. In excise tab, i am selecting part-1 entry along with that system is also asking customer code in customer field which is mandatory.
As i am issuing this material which is a spare in nature then there is no requirement of giving customer code.Please guide what settings are required
Regards
Vivek

Hi
No need for RG 23 A Part I entry.
It is your material that you are issuing to the cost center,excise will not be applicable while issue to cost center as you have already taken the credit.
Cheers
Rahul
Awards plz if helpful.

Vendor excise details entries configuration

Hi All,
Could any body explain the path of the vendor CIN configuration?
In the client system in XK01 t code, excise details like ecc no., excise reg. no. and tax details like CST and VAT numbers are made mandatory. But we want those entries should be optional.
Could you please suggest where I can configure that?
Reg
Ramesh

Hello,
You can not make field selection of fields in "CIN details" Tab page.
Since it is not directly linked with Vendor Master Table.
You can try user exits.
FARC0002 -Additional Checks for Archiving MM Vendor Master Data
MM06E010- Field selection for vendor address.
Regards
Mahesh Naik.

Profit center not in derived at the time of excise utilisation

Dear SAP guru
Need your help.....
We are implemented new GL functionality.
At the time of excise utilisation (T code - J2IUN ) - profit center field is not derived in standard SAP transaction because of that system showing error message - profit center mandatory for line item 0001.
Awaiting your reply.
Regards
Anjan

You have to assign profit centre to GL accounts companycode-wise & plant-wise probably using a user exit.

No excise duty for exports

Just so that I don't violate forum rules. I searched this forum for the keywords "Exports Excise Invoice". Did not find a question in the first three pages. So, I am posting mine.
Hello,
I'm working on a export scenario, I want the excise invoice NOT TO capture excise duty (none of these BED,AED,SED). I am not sure but I think it's called ZERO Duty Excise invoice. In exports, as we all know exports are excise exempted.
There are several items in the invoice(approx 15 items), unfortunately in my case the excise invoice is capturing all of BED,AED,SED for each material and my Excise Duty total is exceeding the total invoice(VF01). Which should not be the case.
Simply put my excise invoice should be similar to my commercial invoice in terms of Net value and each material value and it should print Zero Excise duty for each material.
To achieve my objective can I go to FTXP and for the TAX Code maintained for UTXJ put zero for BED,AED,SED and also make the excise condition types statistical in my pricing procedure.
Is this the right approach?
Edited by: SAP SD_Newbie on Sep 11, 2011 7:30 PM
btw, I am using TAXINJ
Edited by: SAP SD_Newbie on Sep 11, 2011 8:01 PM
To make my life miserable, they are using the same Document and Same pricing procedure for other exports scenario where it is mandatory to capture excise and other taxes(can't argue it's their requirement). So the second option of making the tax condition types statistical is ruled out. So, apart from FTXP do I have any other options.

Same pricing procedure for other exports scenario
where it is mandatory to capture excise and other taxes
It is nothing wrong capturing ED in export invoice but it should be statistical.
my Excise Duty total is exceeding the total invoice
Check in J1ID > Excise Tax Rate as to what percent has been maintained for those chapter ids. System will calculate based on this assignment only.
G. Lakshmipathi

Table J_1IEXCDTL - EXBAS isnt updated -Excise Base Amt not flowing to ARE1

Dear Friends,
This is in continuation to the earlier post.......Excise Duty Base Amount is not flowing into ARE1...Iam here briefing up the earlier post details:
When I am creating ARE-1 for the Exports Excise Invoice, Excise Duty Base Amount is not flowing into ARE1 but BED and other cess conditions are flowing into ARE1
Liable to AT1 and Indicator NCCD is checked and in my pricing procedure NCCD condition is not maintained as its not required.
The latest patch updated in my system is SAPKH600011 (Logistics and Accounting).....
Most importantly the Excise base amount field is not seen in the Excise Invoice but in ARE1 this field is in display mode and Excise base value is not flowing into the Table J_1IEXCDTL field EXBAS.
Someone Pl help me on this issue.
Thanks
Sasi
Edited by: j sasi on Jul 9, 2008 7:13 AM

Sasi,
I think you are making a mistake between manual and mandatory. IN the pricing procedure MAN stands for manual condition and mdt stands for mandatory. Now in the standard, the PR00 is an automatic entry and JASS is a manual and a statistical condition. It is not mandatory. PR00 being the base value for calculation of gross price/nett price it is mandatory.
Most of the customers prefer a manual pricing procedure where PR00, discount, surcharge everything is manual.
In such a case change the appropriate condition type to the manual condition with manual has priority in the settings for condition type.
But here you need to enter the prices and all the conditions manually.
Here you should have only one condition type for pricing condition with the category as basic price. PR00 is normally that condition and so is the P101 which is a Price ( STO). Now if there are several select all others to statistical and only PR00 with an account key assignment to ERL.
Ensure that JASS the assesable value as statistical and manual.
If however you want the JASS as the excise base amount then PR00 will be used for calculation of discounts and and NETT price only but JASS will be the one for Excise base amount.
BAsed on this excise base amount which you will find in the table J_1IEXCHDR the values for BED, ECS and SECS gets calculated.
Either way is O.K but one word of caution. There is an assessable value in the J1ID transaction where you maintain the Assessable value for materials. Its mostly used in TAXINJ. DO not use it or even if that field is filled ensure that you give the JASS assessable value manually at the time of calculating SAles ordr pricing.
If you don;t then there will be an error.
Also check in the analysis whch condition basis value is being taken for calculated in your excise conditions.
This should solve your problem.
Remember calculating assessable value is not a small thing but customers prefer it because reversing excise or paying additional excise is a pain for them. If thats the case then so be it.
But ensure that assessable value is calculated nett of discounts and given there.
In one case I came across where otehr charges, finance charges and transportation were added to the basic price and only on the total excise duty was added and discount was given after calculation of excise duty. Please check your scenario in line with your requirement. Any questions. My pleasure to reply.
regards
Jude

Excise mandatory

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for