Exclude a table from time-based reduction

Hi,
Iu2019d like to exclude a table from time-based reduction. How can I do this ? Is there any manual how to do customizing in TDMS ?
Regards
p121848

Thank you Markus for your annotation.
AUFK is technically declared as an Master Data Table, but stores orders. Standard
TDMS provides a reduction of this file and in the client copies we did via TDMS a lot of records disappeared when we selected time-reduction.
Now we fond out that some Transactions as OKB9 or KA03 refer to old internal orders. So we would like to maintain the customizing, to exclude AUFK from reduction. But this is not possible in activity TD02P_TABLEINFO, because no changes can be done to the tables, which have got the transfer_status 1 = Reduce.
You can manipulate the Transfer-Status in file CNVTDMS_02_STEMP before getting to activity TD02P_TABLEINFO, but I wonder whether this is the way one should do.
Any idea ?
Regards p121848

Similar Messages

How to exclude some tables from schema level replicatio????

Hi,
I am working on oracle10g stream replication.
My replication type is "Schema Based".
So can anyone assist me to undersatnd, how to exclude some tables from schema based replication.
Thanks,
Faziarain

You can use rules and include them in the rule set, lets say you dont want LCR to be queued for table_1 in schema SALES, write two rules one for DDL and another for DML with NOT logical condition.
DBMS_RULE_ADM.CREATE_RULE(
rule_name => 'admin.SALES_not_TALBE_1_dml', condition => ' (:dml.get_object_owner() = ''SALES'' AND NOT ' ||
' :dml.get_object_name() = ''REGIONS'') AND ' ||
' :dml.is_null_tag() = ''Y'' ');
DBMS_RULE_ADM.CREATE_RULE(
rule_name => 'admin.hr_not_regions_dlll',
condition => ' (:dml.get_object_owner() = ''SALES'' AND NOT ' ||
' :ddl.get_object_name() = ''table_!'') AND ' ||
' :dsl.is_null_tag() = ''Y'' ');
just go through this document once, http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B28359_01/server.111/b28321/strms_rules.htm#i1017376
Edited by: user8710159 on Sep 16, 2009 5:21 PM

Sales orders in TDMS company/time based reduction are outside the scope

Guys,
I have had some issues with TDMS wheras it didn't handle company codes without plants very well. That was fixed by SAP. But I have another problem now. If I do a company code and time based reduction, It doesn't seem to affect my sales orders in VBAK/VBUK as I would have expected. I was hoping it would only copy sales orders across that have a plant which is assigned to a company code that was specified in the company code based reduction scenario. That doesn't seem to be the case.
VBAK is now about one third of the size of the original table (number of records). But I see no logic behind the reduction. I can clearly see plenty of sales documents that have a time stamp way back from what I specified in my copy procedure and I can see others that have plant entries that should have been excluded from the copy as they do belong to different company codes than the ones I specified.
I was under the impression that TDMS would sort out the correct sales orders for me but somehow that doesn't seem to be happening. I have to investigate further as to what exactly it did bring across but just by looking at what's in the target system I can see plenty of "wrong" entries in there either with a date outside the scope or with a plant outside the scope.
I can also see that at least the first 10'000 entries in VBAK in the target system have a valid from and to date of 00.00.0000 which could explain why the time based reduction didn't work?
Did you have similar experiences with your copies? Do I have to do a more detailed reduction such as specifying tables/fields and values?
Thanks for any suggestions
Stefan
Edited by: Stefan Sinzig on Oct 3, 2011 4:57 AM

The reduction itself is not based on the date when the order was created but the logic enhances it to invoices and offers, basically the complete update process.
If you see data that definitely shouldn't be there I'd open an OSS call and let the support check what's wrong.
Markus

TDMS time based reduction method has no end date

Hello TDMS experts,
I am in the process of configuring the 'Time based reduction' method of TDMS. In the package, I am in phase "System Analysis"->"Analyze and specify'from date'".
Here it gives me the option to specify the start/from date only. If I want to transfer data for only a month in the past lets say april of 2007, then how can I specify the from and to dates.
Please advise.
Thank you,
kind regards,
Zaheer Shaikh

Hi Pankaj,
Thanks for the reply.
In the phase "maintain Table Reduction" I have chosen SAP standard reduction, that means the table reduction is handled by SAP itself. Since my sender system database is 4 Terabytes, my question is if I select the 'from date' as 10th April 2009 (present date is 20 April 2009), will the TDMS still copy the whole tables for which I have not manually defined any reduction?
Please advice.
Thank you,
Kind regards,
Zaheer Shaikh

TDMS - time based reduction - receiver system deletion

Experts,
I'm doing a time based reduction. I'm on the step "Start Deletion of Data in Receiver System". It's been running for over 18hours.
But I don't see any jobs running in SM66 on the Central/Control or Sender or Reciever systems.
When I click on the "Task" button, I see it has completed 8,444 of 12,246 sub activites. There are 3,802 not yet started.
We're on all the latest levels of DMIS and ECC.
Any ideas?
Thanks
NICK

Ashley and Niraj,
Hey, I'm all for tips/tricks so don't worry about messing up my thread.
I completely shut down the central/control system via stopsap and restarted. Still it was in "running" status but no jobs were running on sender/rec or central/control.
So I tried the trouble-shooting but it was un-clear to me what to do.
I ended up highlighting the phase I reference earlier, then doing "execute" again. The status changes from the "truck" to a green flag and I started to see jobs run again on the receiver system. Again they have stopped, but I see another job scheduled to run in a few minutes....It's just weird, I didn't run into this on my last time-based copy.
I'll post a few things I've learned to increase performance:
RDISP/MAX_WP_RUNTIME = 0
At LEAST 25 WP and 25 BCK procs
rec/client = OFF
RDISP/BTCTIME = 60
RUN STATS regularly
TAKE OUT OF ARCHIVELOG MODE
Read/Impl these notes:
Read theseu2026Update these parameters
o TD05X_FILL_VBUK_1 Note 1058864
o TD05X_FILL_VBUK_2 Note 1054584
o TD05X_FILL_BKPF Note 1044518
o TD05X_FILL_EBAN Note 1054583
o TD05X_FILL_EQUI Note 1037712
Set these oracle index on rec system:
Table: QMIH
fields: MANDT, BEQUI
Table: PRPR
fields: MANDT, EQUNR
Table: VBFA
fields: MANDT, VBELN, VBELV, POSNV
set parameter u2018P_CLUu2019 to u2018Yu2019 in the following
activities before you start the activities for filling internal header tables:
TD05X_FILL_BKPF
TD05X_FILL_CE
TD05X_FILL_EKKO
TD05X_FILL_VBUK
TD05X_FILL_VBUK_1
TD05X_FILL_VBUK_2
TD05X_FILL_VSRESB
TD05X_FILL_WBRK_1
run TCODE CNVMBTACTPAR, specify the project number to do this
IMPORTANT TCODEs
CNV_MBT_TDMS_MY  Main TDMS starting point
CNVMBTMON  Process Monitor (must know your project number)
DTLMON  MWB transfer monitor
CNVMBTACTPAR  activity parameters
CNVMBTACTDEF  MBT PCL activity maint
CNVMBTTWB  TDMS workbench to develop scrambling rules
CNV_TDMS_HCM_SCRAM  run in SENDER system for scrambling functionality
Reports
CNV_MBT_PACKAGE_REORG  to reorganize TDMS projects..aka delete
CNV_MBT_DTL_FUGR_DELETE  deletes function groups associated with old projects
Tables
CNVMBTUSEDMTIDS  lists obsolete MTIDs
IMPORTANT NOTES
Note 894307 - TDMS: Tips, tricks, general problems, error tracing
Note 1405597 - All relevant notes for TDMS Service Pack 12 and above
Note 1402704 - TDMS Composite Note : Support Package Independent
Note 890797 - SAP TDMS - required and recommended system settings
Note 894904 - TDMS: Problems during deletion of data in receiver system
Note 916763 - TDMS performance "composite SAP note"
Note 1003051 - TDMS 3.0 corrections - Composite SAP Note
Note 1159279 - Objects that are transferred with TDMS
Note 939823 - TDMS: General questionnaire for problem specification
Note 897100 - TDMS: Generating profiles for TDMS user roles
Note 1068059 - To obtain the optimal deletion method for tables (receiver)
Note 970531 - Installation and delta upgrade of DMIS 2006_1
Note 970532 - Installation of DMIS Content 2006_1
Note 1231203 - TDMS release strategy (Add-on: DMIS, DMIS_CNT, DMIS_EXT...)
Note 1244346 - Support Packages for TDMS (add-on DMIS, DMIS_CNT, ...)
I'm doing this for an ECC system running ecc 6.0 EHP6 by the way.
Still any help with my issue on the delete would be helpful. but post tips I don't kwnow about
NICK

Please explain steps for Time based reduction scenario

Hi,
I am done with the RFC connections.
The scenario I am going to work with is 'Time Based Reduction'.
Can somebody please explain the process step-by-step from here on.
Thanks,
Mohammed Tauseef Ahmed

hi,
thanks for the replies.
the step "Start Programs for Generation and Receiver Settingsu201D is taking very very long time for execution(the log shows that the process started on May20,and it is still going on).
Now till the execution of this step is completed,we cannot execute furthet steps.Is there a way that we can execute the other steps or do we have to wait for this step to be completed?
Secondly, on the suggestion to change the process settings, I was not able to make the changes in process settings. Can the somebody kindly explain step-by-step on how to change the process settings.
Thanks.
Mohammed Tauseef Ahmed

Exclude a table from GATHER SCHEMA STATISTICS

Hello All,
How do you exclude a table from gather schema statistcs?
Thanks.
Gregg

hi,
it is explained here:--
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/appdev.102/b14258/d_stats.htm#i1043993
LOCK_TABLE_STATS Procedure
This procedure locks the statistics on the table.
Syntax
DBMS_STATS.LOCK_TABLE_STATS (
ownname VARCHAR2,
tabname VARCHAR2);
thanks.
Edited by: varun4dba on Dec 10, 2010 7:39 PM

TDMS copy based on Company Code and time based reduction.

I'm struggling to understand the process of this scenario.
I created a new client in the target system (using local client copy with SAP_UCSV).
I configured a time based and company code based reduction.
After the TDMS copy is complete, I check the target system and still find plenty of data that isn't related to the company codes I selected. It appears that it still copies part of the excluded data. For example: I can still find work orders and sales orders for company codes that I specifically didn't select for the copy process.
Any idea why this is? It appears that the copy doesn't bring across ALL of the excluded data. Just some.
I double checked and triple checked my TDMS selection for company code based reduction and I can't find any error in there.
To be more specific: I selected company code A01 A02 A03 and left B01 B02 B03 out. After the copy there are still orders visible in the target system with company code B01 B02 B03.
This is after I created an empty target client first so it's not copying into an already existing client.
Thanks for any guidance guys.

Hm, not sure what's going on. There is no clear link between those existing orders and the company codes I initially selected. Then again it only seems to have a "high level" record of the data. As soon as one starts to drill down, the data is missing as expected. Same goes for other areas as well.
Looks like we can live with that for now so I won't lose any sleep over it anymore.

Exclude TAO tables from stat gathering

Hi,
on FSCM 9.1, Tools 8.52. on Windows 2008. DB Oracle 11g R2.
Automatic stat gathering, collects statistics for temporary tables PS_XXX_TAO. This distorts the Explain plans cardinality but if I delete the statistics :
dbms_stats.delete_table_stats(ownname=>'SYSADM',tabname=>'PS_XXX_TAO');
But it is not permanent and the stats are re collected during the night.
-how to ran a definite delete for that tables ? I mean delete one time but for a permanent result ?
or
-how to exclude these two tables from automatic stat gathering ?
Thanks.

thank you I applied :
exec dbms_stats.lock_table_stats('ADAM','B')
Any Poeplesoft recommendation in documentaries ?
Regards.

Can I exclude places.sqlite from time machine backup?

Hi,
Just looking at the time machine backup and raised a question about the repeated backup of places.sqlite in "~/Library/Application Support/Firefox/Profiles/xxxxxxxx.default/", I am wondering if I can exclude this file from my backup or even exclude Profiles from my backup?
What would this affect my backup? Are these all essentials?
I have looked into this page and understand what places.sqlite does. However, what don't know is if this file is missing, does Firefox produce one automatically?
Or say, if each of my places.sqlite in the prevoius backups was like 90MB, how much size would them really take in the storage?

Alvyn wrote:
Thus, I am thinking if this "places.sqlite" thing is there every hour putting around 100MB to my time capsule, quickly my time capsule will be depleted.
No, that's very small.
Is there any way to do something like trimming time points from time capsule?
Under normal circumstances, you shouldn't have to. TM automatically "thins" (deletes) backups every time it does a new backup, on the following schedule:
"Hourly" backups after 24 hours (except the first of the day, which is a "Daily" backup).
"Daily" backups after a month (except the first of each week, which is a "Weekly" backup.)
"Weekly" backups are kept until TM needs the space for new backups; then one or more of the oldest weeklies will be deleted.
So after a month, even if you do an hourly backup every day, and that 100 mb file is changed and backed-up +*every time+* (not real likely), you'd have 54 backups (1 per day plus 24). That would take a total of 5.4 GB, small potatoes on any TM drive, and really not worth worrying about.
But if you want, you could delete all the backups of it. See #12 in the Frequently Asked Questions *User Tip,* also at the top of this forum.

Exclude MV Table from gather schema stats

Hey,
I am running the daily stats gathering procedure below.
But it is running at the same time with an MV that is refreshing,and it's failing due to that.
Is it possible to exclude the Materialized view from the below schema stats procedure?
BEGIN
dbms_stats.gather_schema_stats(ownname=>'SCOTT',estimate_percent=>dbms_stats.auto_sample_size,degree=>2);
END;
This is running on Oracle 10.2.1.0, on Linux env.

You could lock the statistics onto the tables you don't want to re-gather stats : dbms_stats.lock_table_stats
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/appdev.102/b14258/d_stats.htm#i1043993
Then run the mentioned command will not compute stats on those objects.
Nicolas.

Exclude Hidden File from Time Machine Backup?

Hi all,
Used the Time Machine error message widget, and got the following info:
Starting standard backup
Backing up to: /Volumes/HD Backup/Backups.backupdb
Backup content size: 880.8 GB excluded items size: 247.4 GB for volume Macintosh HD
No pre-backup thinning needed: 760.15 GB requested (including padding), 929.90 GB available
Error: (-36) SrcErr:YES Copying /.DocumentRevisions-V100/PerUID/501/1/com.apple.documentVersions/029AC116-6255- 42B7-977E-7698A590699D.key to (null)
I searched for the trouble file so I could exclude it from the backup, but couldn't find it.
Any ideas?
Thanks!

Alvyn,
On all my machines the Time Machine destination disk is normally excluded. I can't remember if I did this or it's added by default. You can excluded anything you want in the Privacy tab of Spotlight's system preferences.
Regards,
Captfred

How to exclude synchronous interfaces from component based message alerting

Hi Pi experts,
We are configuiring Alerts in PI 7.3 single stack.If we have 'n'number of interfaces, and if we configured general alerts for all.How to exclude synchronous interfaces in that.Alerting is for asynchronous interfaces only.How to do that.
Please advice on this.
Regards
Suneel

Hello,
>>What are your approaches regarding this requirement in the context of java-only?
I would suggest you to schedule jobs like this:
Customize Alerts Using Job in PI 7.31/PO
>> alerts are consumed according to the given interval and not in "real time" when error occurs, today solution using BADI is "real time" - if possible I would prefer "real time" solution
Check this:
Michal's PI tips: How to trigger an alert for Component Based Message Alerts (CBMA) via "API" ?
>>an separate service determine the actual alert count would be helpful to provide the correct value for maxAlerts, this have to be called beforehand
I haven't tried it but i think u can do that, since these consumers are nothing but JMS queues only so i think there will be a method to read number of alert counts.
>>In history I saw emails generated by the standard alert consumer which only contain details for the first alert, in my case I need details especially the message id for all errorneous messages
If ur max alert parameter is greater than 1 then u should see multiple alert text (along with message id and other details) in ur email message.
Thanks
Amit Srivastava

Is it possible to exclude tagged files from Time Machine backups in OS X Mavericks?

E.g. I want to exclude all files and folders tagged "red" from backups.

There may be an Applescript to do this. There is no front end feature to automate this process. You would have to manually exclude given files/folders.
Try posting in the Mac OS X Technologies forum and ask about an Applescript to do so.
Well, that's wrong.
There is:
System Preferences > Time Machine > Options > > > Exclude
Message was edited by: nbar

Cannot exclude FileVault Account from Time Machine...

Hi
I use a FileVault account to work on work-related stuff at home, which I do not want backed up to TimeMachine. Despite excluding this account in TimeMachine prefs, it continued to get backed up after logging out. After reading that exclusions should ideally be set up before the first-ever back-up, I erased my TM drive and started from scratch, excluding both the Home folder (call it ABC) and the sparsebundle (.ABC) for the account. This didn't work, so I also manually edited the TM prefs in /Library to add both these paths under "Exclude by Path".
Yet still it goes to "preparing to back-up ABC..." when I log out. So far I have cancelled this process each time, so there is as yet no back-up on the TM drive, but I simply wish it would not prepare/attempt a back-up and just return to the login window.
What am I missing?
Many thanks

Paul,
Yet still it goes to "preparing to back-up ABC..." when I log out. So far I have cancelled this process each time, so there is as yet no back-up on the TM drive, but I simply wish it would not prepare/attempt a back-up and just return to the login window.
If you have it properly excluded, then let it proceed when you log out. I think what you are seeing is a standard log-out script when a user account is file-vaulted. It's going to always say that even if you have your file-vault excluded.
I believe, that Mac OS starts the file vault backup script automatically, but it hasn't yet hit the fact that your file vault is excluded. So try letting the log out process proceed. It will always say "Preparing to backup ABC..." but then it will hit the exclusion list and should stop. Let is log out and then log back in and see if that's that case.
Otherwise, try deleting the TM Prefs .plist, re-exclude your file vault account, and then log out. You will likely see that message again, but see if it does indeed proceed to back it up.
*Delete The Time Machine Preference .plist*
Go to --> Macintosh HD / Library / Preferences (Note: NOT Home / Library / Preferences).
Drag the .plist file labeled,
com.apple.TimeMachine.plist
to the root level of your Macs’ hard drive.
Reboot your computer.
This .plist file is automatically recreated at startup if it is missing.
Now try choosing the external HD in the TM Prefs for backup.
Cheers!

Exclude a table from time-based reduction

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for