Export quality poor on final output

I'm working on a macbook pro using iLife09.
I've edited everything in FCE 4 and the final output after burning in idvd has 3 movies on it and one of them, about halfway through, continues to have a very pixelated section lasting about 1 minute. it plays choppy and blurry.
in fce 4 I exported>quicktime movie. I've tried making it self contained and not self contained. Same results on both. I use verbatim dvd-R, burn at slowest possible speed, and at professional quality. I've repaired disk permissions, deleted idvd prefs, and saved as "disk image." the results are the same on the disk image. I think this means it is an encoding/burning problem.
All my audio has been converted to .aiff and is 44.1 KHz.
is this an export issue within FCE 4? what other options should I try?

thanks for your quick response. I've been working on it ever since.
the exported QT movie does not display the pixellation.
I switched it to Best Performance as opposed to Professional Quality, but this didn't solve the problem. It seems that the content was too close to filling up the capacity of the dvd. once I shortened the content, the problem went away.
thanks for the suggestions, this gives me other options when other things go wrong in the future.

Similar Messages

  • Final Output - manage my expections

    I'm new to FCP and I'm about ready to export my first project for DVD authoring. I realize that the authoring process will require some trial and error. However, for right now, I just want realistic expections about the resolution quality of my final output. I recognize that a DVD version of my project could never look as sharp as the Canvas. However, is there any reason to believe that the final product can look better than it currently does on my external monitor (a 14" television set)??

    I recognize that a DVD version of my project could never look as sharp as the Canvas. However, is there any reason to believe that the final product can look better than it currently does on my external monitor<<</div>
    You recognize that viewing highly compressed DVD footage won't look as good in the Viewer as the original un or less compressed original footage ... but you don't see how that correlates to when you're viewing on an external TV??
    To answer your question; no. DVD-Video is highly compressed and therefore suffers a quality loos when compared to the original. But like anything else, DVD-Video is GIGO (garbage in, garbage out). The better quality your source footage is, the better the quality it will be after compression.
    -DH

  • Poor export quality Aperture 3

    I've been searching all over the internet and can't seem to find any answers in regards to export quality in Aperture 3. When I finish editing an image and I export it in either TIFF, JPEG or PNG all of them look the same regardless of if I change DPI, File size etc and none of them look even close to as detailed as the original. I'm exporting "version" and changing the options in presets with no luck.
    Can someone help me? I can't accept the poor quality of the exported images as they make my portraits look fuzzy and not sharp (when they're very sharp and vivid in Aperture!). Is it possible to get the same quality in an exported image as I see in Aperture. It seems like it should be a no brainer!
    Thank you!

    I had the same problem. While in a One-to One the Creative told me to do this. What ever you are planning to export the file/files to have pluged in (flash drive, hard drive) or loaded (DVD/CD) before you start the process.
    Chose the file or files by highlighting them then choose File - Export - Version. In the center of the window that will pop up there is a "Export Preset"" tab. He told me to choose TIFF- Original Size (8-bit). He did say that any higher than 8 bit is pointless. I did this and it worked great. I had a large beautiful file that I was blowing up to 30 by 20 and it looked so bad printed before I learned this trick. I printed it again after exporting the new way and it really looked great!
    I hope this solves your problem, it was VERY frustrating for me also.

  • Final output of Final Cut Express HD 3.5 is blurry and out of focus.

    Using clear/sharp '.mov' files as clips. Doing simple editing, nothing fancy. When I finally output the project using 'Export/Using QuickTime Conversion,' the final is blurry and out of focus. I've tried every compression type (H264, Animation, etc.). Same problem. Anyone know why this is happening?
    Although the specs for my computer are well within the Final Cut Express guidelines (I've even upgraded my graphics card to a Radeon 9800 Pro 256 MB), I'm still thinking that perhaps the G4 I'm using doesn't have enough juice to run the FCE software. By the way, I don't have any other programs active when using FCE. Any help on this would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.
    G4 (Mirror Drive Doors)/1.25 GHz/2.0 GB Memory/Radeon 9800XT (256 MB) Mac OS X (10.4.9) 2 Internal 120 GB Hard Drives (RAID)/2 CD-DVD Drives: Super Drive & Combo Drive
    G4 (Mirror Drive Doors)/1.25 GHz/2.0 GB Memory/Radeon 9800XT (256 MB)   Mac OS X (10.4.9)   2 Internal 120 GB Hard Drives (RAID)/2 CD-DVD Drives: Super Drive & Combo Drive

    Thanks for your response.
    Here's what I'm (trying) to do:
    I'm creating short 5 minute tutorial movies that will be distributed as QuickTime movies (burned to disk) for short run distribution (college).
    Here's the process: the movie itself is a recording of monitor screen actions recorded (audio and video) using Snapz Pro movie mode. The recorded size is 800 x 600. There might be 5 such 1 or 2 minute clips. The quality is excellent. I bring them in to FCE, drop all the clips on the same track, and add simple transitions. That's it.
    Now I need to somehow get a final QuickTime movie, with close to the same quality I had in the clips.
    So... I take the FCE file, output it using 'Export>QuickTime Conversion,' using the same size I originally recorded in, 800 x 600. Tried every codec available. Every time, the end result is a very blurred version of the original Snapz Pro recordings.
    I've even tried outputting the FCE file as 'Export>QuickTime Move' (not using the conversion method). Opened that up in QuickTime Pro with the same result: blurred and out of focus.
    I'm viewing the exported file in QuickTime Pro, with the 'Movie Properties' setting of 'High Quality.'
    Any clue? This is driving me crazy. But I'm determined to get this right.
    G4 (Mirror Drive Doors)/1.25 GHz/2.0 GB Memory/Radeon 9800XT (256 MB) Mac OS X (10.4.9) 2 Internal 120 GB Hard Drives (RAID)/2 CD-DVD Drives: Super Drive & Combo Drive

  • Adobe After Effects CS3 horrible export quality

    I made an intro for my Youtube channel using Adobe After Effects CS3, in the preview and whilst I was rendering the video quality was remarkable, no flaw in it. But after it rendered and I exported it as a .flv file the quality was horrible and grainy. Since I'm starting a serious channel my videos have to be high quality, including the intro. Is there any way to make it better quality, perhaps a free program that converts it into a better quality extension, or anything. I appreciate any feedback since I really need this intro in high quality.
    Here's the video link as you can see it's grainy as hell, even when put at 720p(HD):
    As I mentioned before in the preview and whilst rendering the quality was one of the best I've ever seen, no grain or anything, it was flawless, but when I exported, the quality turned to s***. Please help.

    Well, straight to the point: Read YouTube's requirements! FLV? They don't even recomemnd it themselves and in the last 3 years nobody serious has used it. There are enough free H.264 encoders based on ffmpeg. Download one and render an uncompressed movie from AE to be used for final output.
    Mylenium

  • Exporting HD Video From Final Cut Express HD

    When attempting to export HD video from Final Cut Express using "uncompressed" setting, I notice that the output quality seems to be limited to "medium." If no compression is used, wouldn't that imply that the video quality should equal original footage?

    All FCE Timelines are using the AIC (Apple Intermediate Codec) for HD stuff if you selected the correct Easy Setup before you started your Project.
    If you export as a Quicktime Movie then you are getting exactly the same export quality as the Timeline.
    The Quicktime Movie can be either Self-Contained or a Reference file. Reference Files are great because they use/reference you exisating captured files on your Scratch Disc, use less space and export fast.
    However if you need to play the export somewhere other than your Mac your will require the file to be Self-Contained.
    QuickTime Conversion does just that, Converts to whatever you select.
    Al

  • Is the canvas something like "the final output"? Or is that the viewer?

    I am making a video of my HD footage i shot with my Full HD Camcorder (Sony HDR-SR12).
    When i go through te timeline and play something, it shows fully in my viewer, but in the canvas i get only a selection of the full image (it seems that it is zoomed in)... So, my question is, do i have to "make the video smaller" by choosing image+wireframe in the canvas? Because i am afraid that when i output on to a DVD, i will also get the zoomed-in video? Or is the Viewer the "final output?"... I am getting crazy, because i can't let two or more clips play after eachother in the Viewer, right?
    Also, what is the best way to output my full HD footage? (without loosing to much quality) Just click "Export -> Quicktime Movie"? Wil quicktime not lose the HD? Thanx...

    The canvas always displays the final result and quality of your editing in the current sequence in the timeline; the viewer is just a way to monitor single clips (not the composition of clips as in the canvas) and displays the quality of the clip usually before you edit it into the timeline.
    This is important, because if (for example) your sequence (in the timeline) is a standard DV while your captured clips are HD, when you look at a clip in the viewer opened from the browser, you watch it at +HD quality+, when you drag (edit) the same clip into the timeline it is down-converted to the +DV lower quality+; and this is what you see in the canvas. Instead if you open a clip from the timeline (not browser) in the viewer, you see the exact same quality as in the canvas, but only for that single clip. So the best way is to always check quality in the canvas, since it shows the result of all your editing, conversions, and composition, as it will show up in the exported movie.
    Now, to really verify the result in the canvas you must also make sure to:
    - use Fit to Window (from the small zoom button on top of the canvas window) when you want see the full frame and its composition, but not the final quality
    - instead use 100% (same button) to see the final quality for HD
    - or even better connect the firewire output to an HDTV through a HDV deck (or camcorder) for HD, or to a standard TV through a D/A converter (or camcorder) for standard DV. The advantage of this solution is that you see the final result on the final output device while editing, without having to burn DVDs to check it (and this is almost mandatory when you import images and want to have control over interlacing artifacts).
    When you export to iDVD you always use Export/Quicktime Movie even if you burn the DVD on different Mac; if the burner is on the same Mac you can uncheck the Make Movie Self-Contained option, so the file will be smaller and the export faster; otherwise you leave that option checked, and the file will contain all video and audio media necessary for burning (but the file much larger, and export much longer).
    One more note: the Image+Wireframe option in the 2nd small button on top of the canvas (or also viewer) window allows you to apply changes to the frame size and position directly in the canvas without using the Basic Motion control of the viewer; in any case, whatever change you apply and you see in the canvas will be reflected also to the exported movie.
    My guess in your case is that you are using a wrong (standard DV) setup for your sequence even if you captured HD, and that probably you zoomed in too much so that both the canvas and the exported movie show a small portion of the original frame.
    I hope this helps a bit
    Piero

  • HD to SD final output question

    Hello Forum,
    I have just completed Jeff Bellune’s excellent HD to SD tutorial called “hd2sd - High Quality Scaling From HD to SD”. For weeks I have been trying in vain to downscale my 1920 x1080i AVI-8bit YUV HD footage for output to PAL DVD without much luck, resulting in terrible output quality, but for anyone experiencing the same problem I would like to let you know that the quality of the conversion with Jeff's method is absolutely amazing. http://bellunevideo.com/tutlist.php Thanks for the post Jeff you are a star!
    But I have one small problem. In the final process when using VirtualDub to open your AviSynth script file and then saving it out to a Lagarith AVI file.
    The process works as described with great results however the final output file is exported at an output size of 720x576 - 1.250 (5:4) aspect ratio. (Size data extracted from GSpot) The problem is when I import this into Encore the footage does not fill the whole screen.
    My to the forum question is does anyone know how I can change the output file size in VirtualDub to a (16.9) aspect ratio so that when imported into Encore the footage takes up the whole screen in a (16:9) widescreen format.
    Can VirtualDub be used to do this and if so does anyone know the exact settings to be used?
    Any assistance with this will help me greatly.
    Thanks in advance.
    Rex.

    Thank you Jeff
    You are a brilliant person, thank you very much as you solved my long standing and draining problem in one answer!
    The output result is second to none as a matter of fact I can’t even tell the difference from the original footage!
    Everything is fine now but while the Big man himself is about I wonder if you could possibly answer these 3 questions?
    1) I am using Premiere CS5.5, Should I have used the Maximum render quality setting when exporting my MPEG2 file from premiere (this wasn’t mentioned in the CS4 tutorial)
    2).My original source footage used in my test project is 1920 X1080i (1.0) 50Hz Pal - and I have exported 3 versions, one Lower field first, one upper field first and one Progressive no fields. Using the Interpret Footage techniques from your advice I created 3 separate Encore projects in each field setting the thing is I can’t tell the difference between them in my test DVDs. (Q. which field setting do you recommend me use for my final project output to Pal DVD (Note Encore Pal Project settings make reference to Lower field first).
    2) Could I re-import the exported VirtualDub avi file back into premiere. Then edit my project adding effects and titles and when the project is complete export the finished project into Encore either by uncompressed AVI or MPEG2-DVD?. If this is possible will I lose much quality on export? And would you know how I could Interpret the Footage to PAL Widescreen (1.4587).in premiere? (I ask this as it would be much easier to edit with these smaller files as my original files are very resource consuming)
    Again I would be most grateful if you have some advice on these questions as I am a newbie to HD editing but embracing the challenge.
    Thanks again.
    Rex.

  • Is Your Footage Suffering from the Massive Difference in Export Quality Between FCPX

    I read this article today and considering I do all my rendering through Premiere or AME it made me a little concerned. What does Adobe think of this? and has any else experienced this problem?
    Cheers,
    Moja.
    I took this article from: Is Your Footage Suffering from the Massive Difference in Export Quality Between FCPX & Premiere?
    A rational person might assume that the program from which you export your media wouldn't have a noticeable impact on the quality of the final image, especially if the export settings are identical in both programs. A recent test by filmmaker Noam Kroll might just teach us to think twice before making assumptions.
    First, a little bit of background on Kroll's test. Having noticed that exporting from Adobe Media Encoder yielded quicker results than using the same settings and exporting from FCPX, he tended to use Media Encoder for the bulk of his exporting. When a recently exported project came out with some nasty compression artifacts, blocky rendering of certain areas, and a noticeable change in color quality, Kroll put on his detective's hat and tried exporting again from FCPX. To his, and soon to be your, surprise, the exported result from FCPX yielded significantly higher image quality with the EXACT same export and compression settings.
    Don't believe it? Have a look for yourself. According to Kroll, "both FCP X and Premiere Pro were set to output a high quality H.264 file at 10,000 kbps." The image on top was exported from FCPX and the bottom was exported from Premiere Pro.
    Exported from FCPX
    Exported from Premiere Pro
    In the shots above, you'll notice more blocky compression artifacts in the version exported from Premiere, especially on the lower part of the woman's face, and there's a fairly significant reddish hue that's been introduced into the midtones and shadows of the Premiere export. Here's a version of the same shot that is cropped in on the woman's face by 400%. This is where the difference between the two starts to become painfully obvious. Again, FCPX is on top, and Premiere on the bottom.
    Exported from FCPX
    Exported from Premiere Pro
    Here's the conclusion that Kroll came to in his post.
    After seeing this I can confidently say that I will not be compressing to H.264 using Premiere Pro or Adobe Media Encoder any more. [sic] The image from Premiere is so much blockier, less detailed, and muddy looking, not to mention that the colors aren’t at all accurate. In fact I even did another output test later on with Premiere Pro set to 20,000 kbps and FCP X only set to 10,000 kbps and still the FCP X image was noticeably higher quality, so clearly something is up.
    It's really difficult to speculate as to what's going on behind the scenes that's causing such a drastic difference in results between the two programs. However, what is clear is that you should take caution when exporting to h.264 from Premiere and Media Encoder. Regardless of the program that you're using, perform your own tests and make sure that the export process is leaving your media with a visual quality appropriate for the delivery medium.
    The good news here is that Adobe is extremely receptive to feedback from their user base, and their Creative Cloud subscription model allows them to roll out updates with a much higher frequency than they could with the boxed version of the Creative Suite. If more people are experiencing these problems and reporting it to Adobe, chances are that we'll see an update with fixes sometime in the near future. With that said, I have no idea how Adobe handles the technical process of exporting, so it could very well take a complete overhaul of how the program encodes h.264 to fix the problem.

    Well, I did my own little comparison with a shot from my A7s (XAVCS 50mbps) and seeing as I don't have FCP X I used FCP 7. The AME H264 looks nicer than the FCP one in this instance.
    Dropbox - WALKING 444.jpg
    Pro Res 444 from Premiere
    Dropbox - WALKING AME.jpg
    H264 from AME at these settings:
    Dropbox - WALKING FCP.jpg
    H264 from FCP 7 at these settings:

  • Export quality in After Effects

    I'm using After Effects CS4 and have exported as an MPEG-4.  The quality of the final movie is very poor.  It looks like a low quality JPEG.  In After Effects preview, it looks fine.
    I'm familiar with exporting quality videos out of Premiere.  Is the usual workflow to open AE projects in Premiere and use the options there to export?  Or am I missing something in AE?

    That may be, but I'm just not a fan.  I did some tests a few years ago and decided that Animation
    wasn't worth it and that it was in fact creating artifacts in my renders.
    Just to show my work, I am pulling some info from wikipedia as a reference:
    "For complex 3D rendered scenes or digitized film of real-world footage, it barely compresses at all and also can add visible noise."
    Now I know, wikipedia isn't highly reliable, anyone can edit it, blah blah blah, but this statement runs congruent to my own findings.  Add to that the weighty file size, and then the fact that this codec is officially my ENEMY because my students, who are instructed to use Sorenson 3, often forget to change the codec for their .mov renders, and so sometimes I get these bloated files that I have to trash and they have to re-render, and I just don't really care for this codec at all.
    I just don't render video any more.  Haven't for a long time now.  So many advantages to using img sequences, I haven't looked back to big bloated video files.

  • Best Export Quality HD-AVI to DVD

    Hello,
    I'm currently working on a project and have come up with some poor results in my final iDVD disk images, namely blockly looking video.
    I am using FCx 4.0.1 on 10.7.1
    My HD-AVI source video has the following properties:
    When starting my FCx project I selected the DV-NTSC Easy Setup and proceeded to make subclips and a voiceover successfully. My sequence has the following properties:
    In FCx I used the Export->Quicktime Movie to produce my file for iDVD. In iDVD I selected Professonal Quality encoding.
    Are there any ideas in this circumstance as to how to maximize export quality to DVD?
    Much appreciated!

    You have 1440 clips going into and SD Sequence.
    This is the key problem.
    Also I'm not sure how the AVI DML Jpeg clips will go in FCE, you may have to transcode to Apple Intermediate Codec.
    Al

  • Final Output & DVD Question

    Hey Everyone,
    I recently completed a short film and exported to Quicktime at the highest level and the film looks fantastic.
    When I sent it to Compressor at the best quality I could get and outputted to DVD, it still looks good, but if I get close enough to the screen I can see some very minor lines around the edge of things (like an actors head or a closeup of a piece of paper, etc). Is this normal with compression rates on a DVD? Should the image be as crisp as the QT .mov file? Is there a way to make it crisp?
    After briefly reviewing a film I own DVD, I am thinking it is normal, but I wanted to make sure. I am getting ready for the film festival submissions...and may be using a DVD to screen off of in certain festivals.
    Since I shot with the Canon HV-40 in 24p mode and captured the settings at 23.98, I wasn't sure if deinterlacing would be beneficial or not.
    Look forward to your thoughts/knowledge.

    Hi Ben,
    I did not edit with a real production monitor (I plan to get one in the future) I edited on a the 27 inch IMAC. My TV is not HDTV either, but is 16:9 frame. '
    When I was in Compressor preview mode, I even noticed these flaws there. It sounds like this is most likely the norm when it comes to this. Is that correct?
    Also, I spoke with Apple yesterday and they told me to just export by sharing from Final Cut Pro directly versus using Compressor and to use Dual Layer DVD's. Not sure if that made much of a difference or not.
    - Eric
    Message was edited by: EPCFitness

  • Speedgrade CS6 won't apply my Look in the final output

    So I have this problem where I try to output a quick color graded version of my source footage, but the final output shows no difference.  In other words, I import DSLR footage, make all the necessary adjustments (in this case I just applied a look that I saved previously) in SG then render it out as a ProRes 422.  The ProRes version looks the same as my source (DSLR) footage (minus a few megabytes) and doesn't look as if my saved look was ever applied.
    My Output settings are as follows: (NOTE: I have changed all of my output settings trying to solve this problem and, no dice.  So I can only assume that it's not a problem with my output settings)
    Output:
    Format & Options = Apple ProRes 422.  Automatic color calibration = Unchecked.  Write ALE file to output path = Unchecked.  Render annotations = Checked
    Use the same burn-in as playback, No calibration lookup table, Time code source = Source
    Framing:
    Full Image (No Proxy).  1:1 (square).  1080p
    Render
    Offline Quality (fast).
    My system specs are:
    Mac Pro OS X 10.10.1 (Late 2013)
    3.5 GHz 6-Core Intel Xeon E5
    16 GB 1866 MHz DDR3 ECC
    AMD FirePro D500 3072 MB
    Hop I provided enough info.
    Any help is appreciated.
    Thanks!

    With your theory in mind of it being a permissions problem, I went ahead and moved my Looks from an external drive to my computer.  Still no dice.  Although, do you believe that it might need to be in a particular place on my computer?  Like say, a SpeedGrade folder inside and Adobe folder inside my library folder?  I don't see why that would matter.  I found a rather time consuming fix.  If I open the Look in After Effects, I can apply it to the video clip but that's just a little convoluted.
    I'll keep searching for a solution and post any updates.  Thanks for your help thus far!

  • Export quality grainy for TEXT / TITLE

    Hello there,
    Am kind of a newb, but am getting used to the basics and am happy with the video export quality. For some reason, the TITLE objects are coming out grainy, even when viewed at 100% size. I tried different output types, bitrates, changed fonts, font size, position, etc. Put black background behind, removed background, no matter what am still getting the fonts looking crappy once exported.
    Some screenshots of what I see in the Premiere Pro output preview / workspace, and then a second shot showing the resulting output (same result in diff bitrates, just chose one as example)
    In Pro:
    http://fms.whoajack.com/textIssue01.png
    Exported:
    http://fms.whoajack.com/textIssue02.png
    Any ideas?
    Thanks for any suggestions,
    Greg

    DV is far from the best codec for text. But the real problem is that you're using FCP's built-in text generators. Instead, use the Boris Title 3D and Boris Title Crawl generators. They produce much cleaner vector-based text and have a ton of more options for creativity.
    -DH

  • Data Mismatch in the final output

    Hi,
    I am using the eclipse version downloaded from here
    http://www.businessobjects.com/campaigns/forms/downloads/crystal/eclipse/datasave.asp
    In the final output, data seems to be corrupted.
    Example
    Column A
    3500
    9852
    7533
    Sum 35.4
    The sum value reflects the right value, where as the value in column A  is displayed from a different page.
    In short the Column A values are randomly swapped between pages.
    I tested the same report with Visual Studio with the same parameters. It works fine.
    Can some one please provide me a direction.
    Thanks
    Raman

    For your questions,
    1. I have this problem when previewing report in the crystal report viewer. This is not specific to exporting to a third party format, Previewing and even exporting to PDF results in same incorrect output.
    2. I tried exporting it to RPT format and its resulting in exception, See below the exception stack.
    380416980 [TP-Processor23] INFO  com.crystaldecisions12.reports.dataengine  - Validating report parameters
    380416980 [TP-Processor23] ERROR com.businessobjects.reports.reportconverter.v12.V12Converter  - ERROR: Could not convert saved data
    com.crystaldecisions12.reports.dataengine.MissingParameterValuesException: Some parameters are missing values
         at com.crystaldecisions12.reports.dataengine.h.a(SourceFile:802)
         at com.crystaldecisions12.reports.dataengine.SavedDataUpdater.a(SourceFile:85)
         at com.businessobjects.reports.reportconverter.v12.V12SavedDataBackwardConverter.do(SourceFile:450)
         at com.businessobjects.reports.reportconverter.v12.V12SavedDataBackwardConverter.a(SourceFile:380)
         at com.businessobjects.reports.reportconverter.v12.V12SavedDataBackwardConverter.if(SourceFile:292)
         at com.businessobjects.reports.reportconverter.v12.V12SavedDataBackwardConverter.do(SourceFile:108)
         at com.businessobjects.reports.reportconverter.v12.f.do(SourceFile:377)
         at com.businessobjects.reports.reportconverter.v12.V12SaveLoader.a(SourceFile:316)
         at com.businessobjects.reports.loader.ReportSaver.a(SourceFile:75)
         at com.businessobjects.reports.loader.ReportSaver.a(SourceFile:62)
         at com.businessobjects.reports.loader.ReportSaver.saveCopyAs(SourceFile:52)
         at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
         at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
         at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
         at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:616)
         at com.crystaldecisions.reports.formatter.export2.ExportSupervisorEx.a(SourceFile:686)
         at com.crystaldecisions.reports.formatter.export2.ExportSupervisorEx.if(SourceFile:736)
         at com.crystaldecisions.reports.formatter.export2.ExportSupervisorEx.if(SourceFile:619)
         at com.crystaldecisions.reports.formatter.export2.ExportSupervisorEx.a(SourceFile:586)
         at com.businessobjects.reports.sdk.requesthandler.ReportViewingRequestHandler.a(SourceFile:636)
         at com.businessobjects.reports.sdk.requesthandler.ReportViewingRequestHandler.int(SourceFile:672)
         at com.businessobjects.reports.sdk.JRCCommunicationAdapter.do(SourceFile:1944)
         at com.businessobjects.reports.sdk.JRCCommunicationAdapter.if(SourceFile:661)
         at com.businessobjects.reports.sdk.JRCCommunicationAdapter.a(SourceFile:167)
         at com.businessobjects.reports.sdk.JRCCommunicationAdapter$2.a(SourceFile:529)
         at com.businessobjects.reports.sdk.JRCCommunicationAdapter$2.call(SourceFile:527)
         at com.crystaldecisions.reports.common.ThreadGuard.syncExecute(SourceFile:102)
         at com.businessobjects.reports.sdk.JRCCommunicationAdapter.for(SourceFile:525)
         at com.businessobjects.reports.sdk.JRCCommunicationAdapter.int(SourceFile:424)
         at com.businessobjects.reports.sdk.JRCCommunicationAdapter.request(SourceFile:352)
         at com.businessobjects.sdk.erom.jrc.a.a(SourceFile:54)
         at com.businessobjects.sdk.erom.jrc.a.execute(SourceFile:67)
         at com.crystaldecisions.proxy.remoteagent.RemoteAgent$a.execute(SourceFile:716)
         at com.crystaldecisions.proxy.remoteagent.CommunicationChannel.a(SourceFile:125)
         at com.crystaldecisions.proxy.remoteagent.RemoteAgent.a(SourceFile:537)
         at com.crystaldecisions.sdk.occa.report.application.ds.a(SourceFile:186)
         at com.crystaldecisions.sdk.occa.report.application.ReportSource.a(SourceFile:1558)
         at com.crystaldecisions.sdk.occa.report.application.ReportSource.a(SourceFile:337)
         at com.crystaldecisions.sdk.occa.report.application.ReportSource.export(SourceFile:286)
         at com.crystaldecisions.sdk.occa.report.application.AdvancedReportSource.export(SourceFile:209)
         at com.businessobjects.report.web.event.bh.a(SourceFile:158)
         at com.businessobjects.report.web.event.o.a(SourceFile:146)
         at com.businessobjects.report.web.event.bw.broadcast(SourceFile:93)
         at com.businessobjects.report.web.event.am.a(SourceFile:53)
         at com.businessobjects.report.web.a.t.if(SourceFile:2104)
         at com.businessobjects.report.web.e.a(SourceFile:300)
         at com.businessobjects.report.web.e.a(SourceFile:202)
         at com.businessobjects.report.web.e.a(SourceFile:135)
         at com.crystaldecisions.report.web.ServerControl.a(SourceFile:607)
         at com.crystaldecisions.report.web.ServerControl.processHttpRequest(SourceFile:342)
         at com.crystaldecisions.report.web.viewer.CrystalReportViewerServlet.a(SourceFile:109)
         at com.crystaldecisions.report.web.viewer.CrystalReportViewerServlet.doPost(SourceFile:69)
         at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:637)
         at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:717)
         at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:290)
         at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:206)
         at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.java:233)
         at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValve.java:191)
         at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java:127)
         at org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java:102)
         at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(StandardEngineValve.java:109)
         at org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:298)
         at org.apache.jk.server.JkCoyoteHandler.invoke(JkCoyoteHandler.java:190)
         at org.apache.jk.common.HandlerRequest.invoke(HandlerRequest.java:291)
         at org.apache.jk.common.ChannelSocket.invoke(ChannelSocket.java:774)
         at org.apache.jk.common.ChannelSocket.processConnection(ChannelSocket.java:703)
         at org.apache.jk.common.ChannelSocket$SocketConnection.runIt(ChannelSocket.java:896)
         at org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPool$ControlRunnable.run(ThreadPool.java:690)
         at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:636)
    380416981 [TP-Processor23] INFO  com.businessobjects.reports.reportconverter.v12.V12Converter  - Converting to version 12 finished successfully
    380416982 [TP-Processor23] ERROR com.crystaldecisions.reports.common  - Failed to load the resource 'InternalFormatterException' from the bundle java.util.PropertyResourceBundle@58fd36e4.
    java.util.MissingResourceException: Can't find resource for bundle java.util.PropertyResourceBundle, key InternalFormatterException
         at java.util.ResourceBundle.getObject(ResourceBundle.java:402)
         at java.util.ResourceBundle.getString(ResourceBundle.java:362)
         at com.crystaldecisions.reports.common.CrystalResources.loadString(Unknown Source)
         at com.crystaldecisions.reports.common.CrystalResources.loadMessage(Unknown Source)
         at com.crystaldecisions.reports.common.CrystalResourcesFactory.getLocalizedMessage(Unknown Source)
         at com.crystaldecisions.reports.common.CrystalException.getLocalizedMessage(Unknown Source)
         at com.crystaldecisions.reports.common.CrystalException.getMessage(Unknown Source)
         at java.lang.Throwable.getLocalizedMessage(Throwable.java:284)
         at java.lang.Throwable.toString(Throwable.java:360)
         at java.lang.Throwable.<init>(Throwable.java:259)
         at java.lang.Exception.<init>(Exception.java:94)
         at com.crystaldecisions.reports.common.CrystalException.<init>(Unknown Source)
         at com.crystaldecisions.reports.common.CrystalException.<init>(Unknown Source)
         at com.crystaldecisions.reports.exportinterface2.exceptions.ExportException.<init>(SourceFile:22)
         at com.crystaldecisions.reports.exportinterface2.exceptions.InternalFormatterException.<init>(SourceFile:15)
         at com.crystaldecisions.reports.formatter.export2.ExportSupervisorEx.if(SourceFile:763)
         at com.crystaldecisions.reports.formatter.export2.ExportSupervisorEx.if(SourceFile:619)
         at com.crystaldecisions.reports.formatter.export2.ExportSupervisorEx.a(SourceFile:586)
         at com.businessobjects.reports.sdk.requesthandler.ReportViewingRequestHandler.a(SourceFile:636)
         at com.businessobjects.reports.sdk.requesthandler.ReportViewingRequestHandler.int(SourceFile:672)
         at com.businessobjects.reports.sdk.JRCCommunicationAdapter.do(SourceFile:1944)
         at com.businessobjects.reports.sdk.JRCCommunicationAdapter.if(SourceFile:661)
         at com.businessobjects.reports.sdk.JRCCommunicationAdapter.a(SourceFile:167)
         at com.businessobjects.reports.sdk.JRCCommunicationAdapter$2.a(SourceFile:529)
         at com.businessobjects.reports.sdk.JRCCommunicationAdapter$2.call(SourceFile:527)
         at com.crystaldecisions.reports.common.ThreadGuard.syncExecute(SourceFile:102)
         at com.businessobjects.reports.sdk.JRCCommunicationAdapter.for(SourceFile:525)
         at com.businessobjects.reports.sdk.JRCCommunicationAdapter.int(SourceFile:424)
         at com.businessobjects.reports.sdk.JRCCommunicationAdapter.request(SourceFile:352)
         at com.businessobjects.sdk.erom.jrc.a.a(SourceFile:54)
         at com.businessobjects.sdk.erom.jrc.a.execute(SourceFile:67)
         at com.crystaldecisions.proxy.remoteagent.RemoteAgent$a.execute(SourceFile:716)
         at com.crystaldecisions.proxy.remoteagent.CommunicationChannel.a(SourceFile:125)
         at com.crystaldecisions.proxy.remoteagent.RemoteAgent.a(SourceFile:537)
         at com.crystaldecisions.sdk.occa.report.application.ds.a(SourceFile:186)
         at com.crystaldecisions.sdk.occa.report.application.ReportSource.a(SourceFile:1558)
         at com.crystaldecisions.sdk.occa.report.application.ReportSource.a(SourceFile:337)
         at com.crystaldecisions.sdk.occa.report.application.ReportSource.export(SourceFile:286)
         at com.crystaldecisions.sdk.occa.report.application.AdvancedReportSource.export(SourceFile:209)
         at com.businessobjects.report.web.event.bh.a(SourceFile:158)
         at com.businessobjects.report.web.event.o.a(SourceFile:146)
         at com.businessobjects.report.web.event.bw.broadcast(SourceFile:93)
         at com.businessobjects.report.web.event.am.a(SourceFile:53)
         at com.businessobjects.report.web.a.t.if(SourceFile:2104)
         at com.businessobjects.report.web.e.a(SourceFile:300)
         at com.businessobjects.report.web.e.a(SourceFile:202)
         at com.businessobjects.report.web.e.a(SourceFile:135)
         at com.crystaldecisions.report.web.ServerControl.a(SourceFile:607)
         at com.crystaldecisions.report.web.ServerControl.processHttpRequest(SourceFile:342)
         at com.crystaldecisions.report.web.viewer.CrystalReportViewerServlet.a(SourceFile:109)
         at com.crystaldecisions.report.web.viewer.CrystalReportViewerServlet.doPost(SourceFile:69)
         at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:637)
         at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:717)
         at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:290)
         at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:206)
         at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.java:233)
         at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValve.java:191)
         at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java:127)
         at org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java:102)
         at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(StandardEngineValve.java:109)
         at org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:298)
         at org.apache.jk.server.JkCoyoteHandler.invoke(JkCoyoteHandler.java:190)
         at org.apache.jk.common.HandlerRequest.invoke(HandlerRequest.java:291)
         at org.apache.jk.common.ChannelSocket.invoke(ChannelSocket.java:774)
         at org.apache.jk.common.ChannelSocket.processConnection(ChannelSocket.java:703)
         at org.apache.jk.common.ChannelSocket$SocketConnection.runIt(ChannelSocket.java:896)
         at org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPool$ControlRunnable.run(ThreadPool.java:690)
         at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:636)
    Edited by: muthusada on Jan 11, 2012 3:09 AM

Maybe you are looking for