Express database solve is taking time to refresh.

We created one model solve through OFA, But if we submit the solve its taking 6 to 7 hours to complete the solve.
What could be the problem ?
Is there any design issue ?
and what are all the thing we need to take care while designing the solve model. If any one knows tuning document for Express. please let me know.
Thanks
Murugesan

Hi Scott,
The following is the details about the FDI. The FDI dimensioned by the following dimension in the same order.
     Time
     Account
     Product line
     Product type
     Company
     Platform
I have created a composite for account, product line, product type, company and platform and the time dimension as fast varying dimension.
A rollup solve is associated with this variable. Now the problem it is taking 7 to 8 hours to run the rollup if I submit the separately. However if I submit the rollup solve using groups solve. It is taking only 3 hours.
Why it is taking more time if I submit the rollup solve separately. Is there any design issue.?
In Express tuning manual stated that if the application is related to financial then should not use time dimension as fast varying dimension.
I am using the above variable in the financial application. Is this time dimension affecting the performance?
Do I need to change the sparse definition to exclude product line as fast varying dimension and the time dimension as slowly varying dimension?
Thanks
Murugesan

Similar Messages

Web-I Report taking lots of time to refresh when filters changed

In BO XI 3.1 Web-I report is taking lot of time to refresh when any changes are made in edit query mode on the filters.
When the query is runned for the first time it runs well, but if we make any changes in the filters pane, it is taking lots of time to refresh, and when we cancel the query web-i server is not releasing the server resources (CPU, Memory)
Did anyone face this kind of a problem, and resolved it.
Please let me know your thoughts
Thank you

Hi,
why do you need 100K rows in your reports? Is there a way to consolidate/aggregate your data on the database?
Comparing sqlplus and BOBJ is a little bit unfair. Let me explain you why:
sqlplus starts displaying data after the query returns the first results. I am sure that if you measure the time that sqlplus needs to display ALL rows, this should be way more than just 10 secs.
On the other hand BOBJ will display something as soon as the first page can be created. Depending on the way your report is structured, it may be the case that the WebI server should first get ALL rows in order to be able to display the first page of your report. This is for example the case if you let the total number of pages being displayed or if you display total sums already at the header of your report or if you have added a chart based on your data also in the header of your report. Of course, after the first call the report will be cached (and thus fast to be displayed) until you change again the parameters values for your query.
Since you do not display (or do you use this function in a variable or a formula, maybe?) the total number of pages in your report, I can only assume that you either trying to display total sums (or other kinds of aggregated values) or a chart in the first page of your report. Can you confirm this?
Regards,
Stratos

Work book is taking more time to refresh

Hi Gurus,
we are facing an issue with the workbook, one query is inserted in the workbook and the User has inserted few more sheets in the workbook and performing some calculations ,when the user perform calculations and refresh the workbook it is taking 45 to 1hr time to refresh. Could you pls suggest
Thanks

Hi Chakri,
Refresh time mainly depends on the calculations, How many KFs are used in the sheets and the complex calculations can also affect.
Please put exact details of query/work sheets or try to reduce overlapping sheets or make them different file.
Rds

How can I Purge in SQL Express database?

For development purposes, we created a Hyper-V VM running Windows 7 with BizTalk Server 2010 installed running against a SQL Express database. We also installed Visual Studio (licensed) for map development.
Over time, the BizTalk tables grow, and are taking up way too much storage space.
I looked at the "Microsoft recommended" method of purging the BizTalk database/tables, but it requires enabling a DTA job in SQL Agent which is not available in SQL Express (as far as I know.)
How can I purge the BizTalk tables in SQL Express to reclaim storage space?
Since this is a development platform, I do NOT care about ANY historical data being retained, only "system" data (such as parties, etc.)
Thanks!!
Jim Barr

You can use the various cleanup scripts to purge the database. Details:
http://biztalkscheduledtask.codeplex.com/
Of course, you should not be using SQL Express.

Insert statement taking time on oracle 10g

Hi,
My procedure taking time in following statement while database upgrading from oracle 9i to oracle 10g.
I m using oracle version 10.2.0.4.0.
cust_item is matiralize view in procedure and it is refreshing in the procedure
Index is dropping before inserting data into cust_item_tbl TABLE and after inserting data index is created.
There are almost 6 lac records into MV which are going to insert into TABLE.
In 9i below insert statement is taking 1 hr time to insert while in 10g it is taking 2.30 hrs.
EXECUTE IMMEDIATE 'ALTER SESSION ENABLE PARALLEL QUERY';
EXECUTE IMMEDIATE 'ALTER SESSION ENABLE PARALLEL DML';
INSERT INTO /*+ APPEND PARALLEL */ cust_item_tbl NOLOGGING
         (SELECT /*+ PARALLEL */
                 ctry_code, co_code, srce_loc_nbr, srce_loc_type_code,
                 cust_nbr, item_nbr, lu_eff_dt,
                 0, 0, 0, lu_end_dt,
                 bus_seg_code, 0, rt_nbr, 0, '', 0, '', SYSDATE, '', SYSDATE,
                 '', 0, ' ',
                               case
                             when cust_nbr in (select distinct cust_nbr from aml.log_t where CTRY_CODE = p_country_code and co_code = p_company_code)
                             THEN
                                     case
                                        when trunc(sysdate) NOT BETWEEN trunc(lu_eff_dt) AND trunc(lu_end_dt)
                                        then NVL((select cases_per_pallet from cust_item c where c.ctry_code = a.ctry_code and c.co_code = a.co_code
                                                      and c.cust_nbr = a.cust_nbr and c.GTIN_CO_PREFX = a.GTIN_CO_PREFX and c.GTIN_ITEM_REF_NBR = a.GTIN_ITEM_REF_NBR
                                                      and c.GTIN_CK_DIGIT = a.GTIN_CK_DIGIT and trunc(sysdate) BETWEEN trunc(c.lu_eff_dt) AND trunc(c.lu_end_dt) and rownum = 1),
                                                      a.cases_per_pallet)
                                  else cases_per_pallet
                              end
                      else cases_per_pallet
                 END cases_per_pallet,
                 cases_per_layer
            FROM cust_item a
           WHERE a.ctry_code = p_country_code ----varible passing by procedure
             AND a.co_code = p_company_code   ----varible passing by procedure
             AND a.ROWID =
                    (SELECT MAX (b.ROWID)
                       FROM cust_item b
                      WHERE b.ctry_code = a.ctry_code
                        AND b.co_code = a.co_code
                        AND b.ctry_code = p_country_code ----varible passing by procedure
                        AND b.co_code = p_company_code   ----varible passing by procedure
                        AND b.srce_loc_nbr = a.srce_loc_nbr
                        AND b.srce_loc_type_code = a.srce_loc_type_code
                        AND b.cust_nbr = a.cust_nbr
                        AND b.item_nbr = a.item_nbr
                        AND b.lu_eff_dt = a.lu_eff_dt));explain plan of oracle 10g
Plan
INSERT STATEMENT CHOOSECost: 133,310 Bytes: 248 Cardinality: 1
     5 FILTER
          4 HASH GROUP BY Cost: 133,310 Bytes: 248 Cardinality: 1
               3 HASH JOIN Cost: 132,424 Bytes: 1,273,090,640 Cardinality: 5,133,430
                    1 INDEX FAST FULL SCAN INDEX MFIPROCESS.INDX_TEMP_CUST_AUTH_PERF_MV Cost: 10,026 Bytes: 554,410,440 Cardinality: 5,133,430
                    2 MAT_VIEW ACCESS FULL MAT_VIEW MFIPROCESS.TEMP_CUST_AUTH_PERF_MV Cost: 24,570 Bytes: 718,680,200 Cardinality: 5,133,430 can you please look into the issue?
Thanks.

According to the execution plan you posted parallelism is not taking place - no parallel operations listed
Check the hint syntax. In particular, "PARALLEL" does not look right.
Running queries in parallel can either help performance, hurt performance, or do nothing for performance. In your case a parallel index scan on MFIPROCESS.INDX_TEMP_CUST_AUTH_PERF_MV using the PARALLEL_INDEX hint and the PARALLEL hint specifying the table for MAT_VIEW MFIPROCESS.TEMP_CUST_AUTH_PERF_MV Cost might help, something like (untested)
select /*+ PARALLEL_INDEX(INDX_TEMP_CST_AUTH_PERF_MV) PARALLEL(TEMP_CUST_AUTHPERF_MV) */Is query rewrite causing the MVs to be read? If so hinting the query will be tricky

I want to know what should do if the SPID : 12 Checkpoint is taking time.

Hi Team,
I want to know what should do if the SPID : 12 Checkpoint is taking time.
I can't kill it also.
Thanks

It was taking quite long therefore I have pasted here the comments and there was a activity for database restore was pending on that database due to which I have to restart the instance service.
If next time it will occur what should I do?
Nothing you cannot do anything reason being it is system process. I guess i said same thing in my comment before. Its just there because system is running checkpoint. I upfront cannot suggest what you should do but I have seen this on many prod databases and
it is normal. Dont restart SQL Server services if database is in middle of restore
Please mark this reply as answer if it solved your issue or vote as helpful if it helped so that other forum members can benefit from it
My Technet Wiki Article
MVP

Wicd takes a long time to refresh

Ok, I am not entirely sure what will be relevant to this inquiry, so I will wait a post to put up the needed logs or config files.
Right now, dbus, hal, wicd and wicd-client all load. The iwlagn module loads. The trouble is that Wicd started taking a long time (~3-5 minutes) to refresh the first time I open the client's gui. If I am in an area that snags a signal I have used before it loads it just fine usually before I can even get firefox to wake up and get it's fat a$$ moving when I first boot the comp.
The trouble starts when I am in a new wifi area, like school, where the signals are for networks not on Wicd's list. I have to open the gui to select the right one, but it just sits there blank for a long time. Once it refreshes the first time, it refreshes again in just ~20 seconds.
When I kill wicd-client and start it from terminal, all it says is ***refreshing***.
Any and all help would be greatly appreciated, and while it is an inconvenience, it's not crippling.

hi,
If you discover significant high frontend time, check whether the formatting is the reason. If so, either switch it off or reduce the result lines.
As formatting information is not transferred, the time consumed in the frontend can be reduced.
But the workbook you are executing may obviously take much time.
Message was edited by: AVR - Intelli

Using Materilaized view in a query .. query is taking time????

Hi I have a query :-
SELECT rownum as id, u.last_name, u.first_name,u.phone phone, u.empid,u.supervisor id
FROM emp_view u -- using view
CONNECT BY PRIOR u.empid = u.supervisor_id
START WITH u.sbcuid = 'ph2755';
here emp_view is a view .
------ The above query is taking 3 sec to execute.
Then I created Materialuized view emp_mv and the the MV query is same as emp_view view query.
After this i executed following sql
SELECT rownum as id, u.last_name, u.first_name,u.phone phone, u.empid,u.supervisor id
FROM emp_mv u -- using materialized view
CONNECT BY PRIOR u.empid = u.supervisor_id
START WITH u.sbcuid = 'ph2755';
this query is taking 15 sec to execute..... :(
can anyone please tell me why MV query is taking time????

Hi,
In your first case you query a view, meaning that you query the underlying tables. These probably have indexes and stats are updated.
In you second case you query a materialized view, meaning that you query the underlying base table of that mview.
This probably do not have the same indexes to support that query.
But of course, I'm just guessing based on the little information provided.
If you want to take this further, please search for "When your query takes too long" and "How to post a tuning request".
These two threads holds valuable information, not only on how to ask this kind of question, but also how to start solving it on your own.
Regards
Peter

Gl posting is taking time

Hi All,
Everyday we run a gl process. Gl posting is taking more 1 hr. Same way 4 gl posting run during gl process which is causing
performance delay.
I see in the the log file that below stage is taking time.
glpibr.concurrency() 02-MAR-2013 08:13:03
glpibr.concurrency() 02-MAR-2013 08:13:03
glpidb() 02-MAR-2013 08:46:41
glpidb() 02-MAR-2013 08:49:59
glpibr() 02-MAR-2013 08:49:59
This process itself takes more than 30 hours. It varies everyday. Sometime it takes 1 hr also.
insert into gl_balances
( set_of_books_id, code_combination_id, currency_code, period_name,
actual_flag, budget_version_id, encumbrance_type_id, last_update_date,
last_updated_by, period_type, period_year, period_num, period_net_dr, period_net_cr,
period_to_date_adb, quarter_to_date_dr, quarter_to_date_cr, quarter_to_date_adb, year_to_date_adb,
project_to_date_dr, project_to_date_cr, project_to_date_adb, begin_balance_dr, begin_balance_cr,
period_net_dr_beq, period_net_cr_beq, begin_balance_dr_beq, begin_balance_cr_beq, template_id, translated_flag )
select pi.set_of_books_id, pi.code_combination_id, pi.currency_code, pi.period_name, pi.actual_flag, pi.budget_version_id, pi.encumbrance_type_id, sysdate, :fnd_user_id, pi.period_type, pi.period_year, pi.period_num, 0, 0, NULL, 0, 0, NULL, NULL,
0, 0, NULL, 0, 0, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, pi.template_id, pi.translated_flag from gl_posting_interim_50130 pi where not exists ( select 'X' from gl_balances b where b.set_of_books_id = pi.set_of_books_id and b.code_combination_id = pi.code_combination_id and b.currency_code = pi.currency_code and
b.period_name = pi.period_name and b.actual_flag = pi.actual_flag and
nvl(b.encumbrance_type_id, -1) = nvl(pi.encumbrance_type_id, -1) and
nvl(b.budget_version_id, -1) = nvl(pi.budget_version_id, -1) and decode(b.translated_flag, '', '-1', 'Y', '0', 'N', '0', 'R', '1', b.translated_flag) = decode(pi.translated_flag, '', '-1', 'Y', '0', 'N', '0', 'R', '1', pi.translated_flag) )Above query is taking more than 30 mins as i can see in awrreport . As per metalink note id - 1096873.1 it is due to gl_posting_interim tables which is locking the another gl_interim_posting tables. I dont see any lock but i can see lots of gl_posting_interim present in the database. As per my knowledge this table must be dropped after posting got over.
Env details -
Apps version - 11.5.10.2
DB version - 11.2.0.1
OS - IBM AIX 6.1
Please suggest.
Thanks

Please see these docs.
R11i GLTTRN Translation Performance Issue In INSERT INTO GL_BALANCES [ID 761898.1]
Information Center: Optimizing Performance for Oracle General Ledger [ID 1489537.2]
Performance Issue With Translation Program After Upgrading To 10G Database [ID 742025.1]
Deleting Summary Accounts Has Poor Performance [ID 1088585.1]
GL Posting Performance Issue at glpip2() [ID 280641.1]
GLPPOS Performance Issue After 9i To 10g Upgrade in gluddl.lpc [ID 1262020.1]
Thanks,
Hussein

Problem of Cube data in oracle express database

I am having one problem related to express server database created using relational access administrator. I am using express objects to create some adhoc analysis reports. For that i have created express database using Relational Access Administrator(RAA). I have done the following steps:
     1. Created Dimensions (D1,D2,D3)
     2. Created Variable V1 having dimensions (D1,D2,D3)
     3. Mapped D1 dimension to D1_table (dimension table in oracle schema) and same for the rest two also
     4. Mapped Vaiable to F1_Table (fact table in oracle schema)
     5. Saved this project in RAA.
     6. It will create one Data Cude related to vairable V1.
     7. I have created express database maintenance procedure using RAA
     8. Executed express database maintenance (created above) using Batch manager.
     9. Now I try to access V1 variable in express objects. "It shows me values for all related dimensions in this variable,      But it does not show me value for the fact related to this vaiable. It shows blank information."
     If you have any solution then please let me know.
     Thanks in advance.
Surinder Kaur

Hi Visu,
You can do the selective deletion after carefully making the selections. It may also be a good idea to break up the delete process: Like if you need to delete 2004 data for one company code, then you can do that montt by month.
It is okay to include the compression in a process chain. What we usually do is to compress requests that are eg. older than 15 days. By that time we can be sure that this data is correct. You can also make these settings by number of requests to leave uncompressed.
Hope this helps...

PartitionOn taking time

Hi All,
We have weekly maintainence for essbase cube. There are total 2 source cubes and target cubes for the reporting purposes. The target cubes are accessed through the
partitions. During weekend maintainence process we load the data into the cube and in the end we run the Partitionon.bat script to create partition betweeb the cubes
here the problem comes "the script is common for all the countries but for some countries the script excutes in 20 min and for some countries it takes nearly 1hr even
though the cube size is very less when compared with the countries which execute first".
Thanks in advance.

Hi MattRollings ,
As i said we are having two types of partitions one is for statitic reports and the another for the dyanmic reporting. yes the script which we use to for partitionon will create the partitions. The Script is common for all the countries and the script runs like this
1.First it creates the Transparent partition.
2.Then to create the Replica it refreshes from the two source cubes after that aggregation happens asually.
The main problem comes here during the refresh from the source to the Target its taking time. To say exactly during the refresh from source to the replica its taking 15min. For the other countries its taking only 8 min of time.
I have gone ahead to compare two different countries replica cubes size what i found is that one country cube size is 2Gb and the another one is 2.5Gb the one which is having less size taking 20min to complete and the other one takes 1hr time. Even though the second one is .5GB extra when compared with the first it should take 25min to create the replica partition.
what might be reason to consume more time while creating replica partition? Is it dependent on Defined Blocks, Actual Blocks,Non missing leaf blocks etc?
Thanks Matt in advance.

Oracle Express Database to Microsoft SQL

We are trying PCM v13 and when we installed it we choose to go with the Oracle Express database, if i want to install PCM again but this time using a Microsoft SQL database can i migrate or convert the previous database ?
Also I would like to know if there is a method to migrate the database of PCM 13 to be compatible with a PCM v14
Thanks in advance

The dbsetup utility includes options for both migrating from one dbms to another, and also for converting from a prior version, so the answer to both questions is yes.

Form printing taking time.

Hi experts,
From me23n trnasaction , when i click on print preview and take an output type system is taking time to display adobe form.
what could be the reason for this, custom program is linked to the adobe form.
Please help me in this regards, its u
jayant.

Hi,
There are a number of elements;
The print progam
- Could contain inefficient database access or other slow running code
The adobe form
- Could have inefficient ABAP code in the interface initialisation
The ADS
- Could be under-speced or overloaded with requests
The frontend
- Could be under-speced, unable to launch the adobe viewer in a reasonable time
The first two you can identify using regular perfromance tuning techniques (search for more help), the other two would need basis or desktop support input. Also, you might need to consider the network that joins all of these steps together.
Regards,
Nick

UCCX What field and table of the UCCX database contains the max time to answer a call?

What field and table of the UCCX database contains the max time to answer a call?
Also when performing an aggregate function on CSQ queries do I group on target id? Is that the unique identifier?

Hi Christina,
Please find the information of the UCCX DB schema in the following table:
http://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/cust_contact/contact_center/crs/express_8_5/user/guide/uccx85dbschema.pdf
Regards,
Arundeep

My Inbox Takes a Long Time to Refresh

My inbox on Mac Mail (desktop / Mavericks) takes a very long time to refresh. Messages that I have archived on iOS or on my other Mac (Mac Air) are still in the inbox and new messages do not appear.
I have rebuild the inbox, refreshed, re-started etc to no avail. There is only a lag on my gmail accounts. I am aware of the "All Messages" issue with Mavericks and my IMAP is set up properly.
Hardware Overview:
Model Name:          MacBook Pro
Model Identifier:          MacBookPro5,2
Processor Name:          Intel Core 2 Duo
Processor Speed:          3.06 GHz
Number of Processors:          1
Total Number of Cores:          2
L2 Cache:          6 MB
Memory:          8 GB
Bus Speed:          1.07 GHz
Boot ROM Version:          MBP52.008E.B05
SMC Version (system):          1.42f4
System Software Overview:
System Version:          OS X 10.9 (13A603)
Kernel Version:          Darwin 13.0.0
Boot Volume:          Macintosh HD
Boot Mode:          Normal
Secure Virtual Memory:          Enabled
Time since boot:          2:02

Yes, i'm using the charger that came with it.
My iPad is iPad with retina display
No, i'm not using it while it charges. I turn it off to charge it. The firsts charges were quicker, but now it's take too long to charge.

Express database solve is taking time to refresh.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for