Extending the End Date of Relationship Org. Unit and Position

Hi All,
Please help me below.
Problem: The end date for the relationship between org. unit and position should be set back to 31.12.9999. It was accidentally been set to 31.03.9999 and results to two records in infotype 0001, which the wrong record should be deleted.
This can only be deleted by changing the relationship end date in PO13 but unfortunately, the user doesn't have any access to this transaction.
Request: Can you explain to me on how the end date can be change in transaction PPOME or PPOM_OLD as these are the only transactions the user has an access. I'd already explored these transactions but I can't find on how it should be deleted here.
Thanks!

Hi Raju,
Thanks for this information. This was a very helpful answer. But I only need to extend the end date of a particular infotype 0001 record of a particular employee. I think the report will extend all of the records of all the employees in the system. I can't find any parameter in the report wherein I can set the employee number I wish to extend the end date.
Thanks!

Similar Messages

  • What are the infotypes should i maintain for  org units and positions in om. and how can i see positions under org units.

    can anyone help me

    Hi,
    It is depends on your requirement. compulsory info types are 1000 1001 1002 1003 1008 1018....
    go to pp02 and click on F4 option in IT field and Subtype field.
    Example:
    1000
    Object
    1001
    Relationships
    1002
    Description
    1003
    Department/Staff
    1004
    Character
    1005
    Planned Compensation
    1006
    Restrictions
    1007
    Vacancy
    1008
    Acct. Assignment Features
    1009
    Health Examinations
    1010
    Authorities/Resources
    1011
    Work Schedule
    1013
    Employee Group/Subgroup
    1014
    Obsolete
    1015
    Cost Planning
    1016
    Standard Profiles
    1017
    PD Profiles
    1018
    Cost Distribution

  • Extend End date after the end date has reached

    Hi gurus,
        We are using SRM5.0 on ECS with backend ECC5.0.
        We notice that after the end date of bid has reached even though there is a bid submitted by supplier , the purchaser still can extend the end date to a later date as long as he has not made the accept or reject choice.
        If it is the case, the purchaser can view the price after the end date reached and then extend the end date and maybe tell other supplier what the price the opponent has submitted. This is not allowed and should be penaltied.
        We just want to know how to avoid this in the term of system. Can we make the
    end date field unchangeable after the end date has reached? or any other solutions?
    Thank you in advance.
    Message was edited by:
            YE Wang

    Hi,
    As Teja and SAndeep mentioned,you can go for either the Approval or BADI approach.
    In case you are implementing the BADI,you can make the concerned fields grayed out so no changes are made but then this would mean that <b>no changes
    </b> can be done at all after the END date has been reached.
    In case of workflow,you can have you starting conditions in which you will compare the end date and the system date .If same,you can trigger  a Workflow for approval of any changes to be done further.So even if the changes are made,the chnages are approved by a higher authority.
    Another way would be to implement the "BBP_DOC_CHECK_BADI" to check whether the end date has been reached and then allow the user to do any changes.You can use the FM "BBP_PD_BID_GETDETAIL" to get the details of the BI and then check.In this case,you can additionally check for other parameters of the User like role,authorisation based on which he can make changes in exceptional cases.
    BR,
    Disha.
    <b>Pls reward points for useful answers.</b>

  • Org Unit Under Position

    Hi,
    Can we create an org unit under a position (other than chief position)
    Eg: GM will be the top of the Company, under GM different departments, is it possible in OM..?
    I would appreciate your help. Thanks!
    SD.

    Hi SD,
    Functional units are reprseneted in OM.Please check allowed relationship per object type.tcode OOIT..Org units and Position relationship can be assimilated using this.
    please check T778T,T777E(Table  T777E contains all the relationships permitted between organizational objects)
    Table  T7791 contains information about which SAP organizational object types should be linked with positions, which with jobs and which with organizational units.
    objects and relationships are building blocks of OM(1000 and 1001)
    please refer to the below link for more details
    https://cw.sdn.sap.com/cw/docs/DOC-39190
    Hope this helps.
    No Worries
    KG

  • Changing personnel area/subarea (IT1008) from org unit to position

    We are live with PA and Org. Mgmt, but have been advised to change the infotype 1008 data - personnel area and subarea to be stored on the position instead of the org unit (where we have it now).  A big reason for this is we have cases when we need to overwrite the personnel subarea at the position level.  For example, a position belonging to an org unit with subarea ABCD, may really be in subarea WXYZ.  Therefore, even though the org unit is ABCD, it will be overwritten at the position level to WXYZ.  My understanding is that the RHINTE30 program will not work approrpiately if we are maintaining the data this way. 
    In transaction PPOME there is an account assignment tab on the org unit with cost center (filled in) and personnel area/subarea (which will be blank moving forward since that data won't be maintained on the org unit).  Then, there is also an account assignment tab on the position with cost center inherited from the org unit (sometimes needing to be overwritten at the position level), and the personnel area/subarea data.  My question is how should I handle the view of PPOME for this data?  Can I hide the personnel area and subarea on the account assignment tab for the org units only so it is not confusing for the users?  The problem with having it this way is that personnel area and subarea are blank on the org unit and filled on on the position.  They are conflicting and both visable/maintainable to the User.  Any advise please?  Thanks!

    Hi Nish,
    I gave you my input on your other related message and now will go for this one.
    As I commented on the other message, RHINTE30 will not integrate infotypes 1008 and 1013. So you don't have to worry about using this functionality (first part of your message).
    On the second part (personnel area / subarea on position rather than org unit): there are some considerations here that are more functional / process driven than technical. From a technical point of view, everything can be done. You can hide data from infotype 1008 on the tabstrip for your org. unit using dynpro handling, even via customizing. You can even transfer the data from infotype 1008 on the org. units to the positions or delimit it on the org units. There are some quite easy ways of achieving this using the LMSW tool (have you used it? I can forward some documentation).
    But personally, I would not recommend to do this from a process point of view. Everything in SAP HR is about the inheritance concept, and I think this works very well when it comes to org. units and positions. It is normally advisable to record personnel area / subarea on the org. unit level. This will be inherited by positions (even if you cannot see it at position level in PPOME) and thus defaulted for the employee. At position level you should handle only the exceptions, which will be in turn also defaulted for the employee holding the position. In this way, data maintenance is minimized. If you delete (or do not use from now on) information about infotype 1008 on org. unit level, your HR department will have to maintain this every time a position is created, and even in cases in which a position is shifted from one org. unit to another one.
    In my opinion, you should address this with your HR department and explain the concept and the consequences of maintaining all at position level. It would only be advisable to do it if the org. unit structure is very cross-personnel areas and subareas. If it is a matter of handling exceptions, again, I would recommend to continue recording this data at org. unit level. All in all, if the data is not recorded on the position and you need to see which is its personnel area, you just need to double-click on the org. unit above.
    Just wanted to let you know my opinion, of course it's your decision. By the way, I'm of course not aware of other possible implications like home-developed reporting and so on.
    Regards,
    Rodrigo

  • Empty start validity date for an org unit

    Dears!
    some time ago we discovered a disturbing issue in Productive data. Some org units have an empty start date. I have no idea how it could be created by users, but now we need to solve it.
    The records with empty start date are visible in PP01 only in Display mode.
    The program RE_RHBEGDA0 (New start date) doesn't help. After running the new record for an object is created but there is still remaining the record with empty start date, but with shifted end date...
    Do you have any idea how to solve this?
    Thanks all in advance,
    Anastasia

    Hi,
    You are right - user definitely couldn't create it. Probably you need to ask you ABAPer.
    I can suggest you to try to copy original record and replace empty start date with valid one: PP01, IT1000, copy, change start date, save.
    Cheers!

  • How we will create relationship with org unit and task catalog

    HI Experts
    How we can create relationship between Org unit and Task Catalog in Organisation management once we grouped all the tasks in one group.
    For Example we have one org unit under that we have 3 depts those will consider as org units only.under 3 depts we have professor,Lecturer,Reader as jobs and positions also.If we create Professor tasks in task catalog which all the tasks will be assigned to positions as well.
    If it is Org unit and Task catalog how we can create relationship.
    Thanks
    Rajji

    Hi,
    Please try.
      DATA: lt_hrp1001 TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF P1001.
      DATA: lw_hrp1001        TYPE p1001.
      lw_hrp1001-mandt = sy-mandt.
      lw_hrp1001-plvar = parent_pos-plvar.
      lw_hrp1001-otype = parent_pos-otype.
      lw_hrp1001-objid = other_pos.
      lw_hrp1001-istat = parent_pos-istat.
      lw_hrp1001-begda = sy-datum.
      lw_hrp1001-endda = lc_endda.
      lw_hrp1001-infty = '1001'.
      lw_hrp1001-aedtm = sy-datum.
      lw_hrp1001-uname = sy-uname.
      lw_hrp1001-rsign = codes.
      lw_hrp1001-relat = relats.
      lw_hrp1001-sclas = lc_sclas.
      lw_hrp1001-sobid = cord_pos.
      append lw_hrp1001 to lt_hrp1001.
          CALL FUNCTION 'RH_INSERT_INFTY'
            EXPORTING
              fcode               = 'INSE'
              vtask               = 'S'
              commit_flg          = 'X'
            TABLES
              innnn               = lt_hrp1001
            EXCEPTIONS
              no_authorization    = 1
              error_during_insert = 2
              repid_form_initial  = 3
              corr_exit           = 4
              begda_greater_endda = 5
              OTHERS              = 6.
    Hope this helps.
    regards,
    Xiang Li

  • Org Unit and Cost Center not displaying in 0001 with A012 relationship

    Hi Guru's,
    Kindly help me in this regard ,
    Whenever i hire a person to a position which has an A012 relationship (Chief Position) then Org Units and Cost centres are not getting displayed in IT0001 .
    But when i hire a person in the same org unit with A003 relationship ; both Org units and Costcentres are getting displayed
    I have used an LSMW for uploading relationships and objects and i have also run integration reports for the same but still i am not able to display org unit and cost centre in it0001 when i hire a person with A012 relationship .
    Kindly Help

    both great advice, also, check this link:
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_45b/helpdata/en/14/d22fe48435d111950d0060b03c6b76/content.htm
    within this information there are various reports to run, which help recon OM and PA integration.  it will help you find your data problem and then fix the data for you if you follow step by step.
    best regards,
    michael

  • Managing Org  units and Master Data in project structure

    How are Org units and Master data managed at the project structure? What would be the appropriate place holders for them in the structure. Should we manage it at the top of the project structure or within the  business scenarios/processes. On what basis should we decide this? How would this impact in case of a global template rollout?
    Please share your experiences regarding this.
    Thanks.
    Mike

    any talented  guy do this way.
    i think  that ur working  in E2E project work
    before  singoff ur business process u should give to ur users  master data templets..they collect for  masterdatas in before realization phase...that time  u should know  how many specifications is there and  in spections how  many in quantitative and how many qualitative u will indentify. if any query let me  back.
    Edited by: Lakshmiananda prasad on Oct 6, 2009 11:48 AM

  • Short dump while changing the end date of infotype 0167 through PA30

    Hi all,
    I am getting short dump while changing the end date of infotype 0167(Health Plans) through Tcode PA30.
    dump descript is as below
    An exception occurred that was not caught.
    Runtime Errors         UNCAUGHT_EXCEPTION
    Except.                CX_HRPA_VIOLATED_POSTCOND
    Date and Time          11.03.2010 07:06:26
    What happened?
        The exception 'CX_HRPA_VIOLATED_POSTCONDITION' was raised, but it was not
         caught anywhere along
        the call hierarchy.
        Since exceptions represent error situations and this error was not
        adequately responded to, the running ABAP program
         'CL_HRPA_SAPUP50R_ADAPTER======CP' has to be
        terminated.
    thanks
    shahid

    Search OSS Notes for that.

  • Best practice on extending the SIEBEL data model

    Can anyone point me to a reference document or provide from their experience a simple best practice on extending the SIEBEL data model for business unique data? Basically I am looking for some simple rules - based on either use case characteristics (need to sort and filter by, need to update frequently, ...) or data characteristics (transient, changes frequently, ...) to tell me if I should extend the tables, leverage the 'x' tables, or do something else.
    Preferably they would be prescriptive and tell me the limits of the different options from a use perspective.
    Thanks

    Accepting the given that Siebel's vanilla data model will always work best, here are some things to keep in mind if you need to add something to meet a process that the business is unwilling to adapt:
    1) Avoid re-using existing business component fields and table columns that you don't need for their original purpose. This is a dangerous practice that is likely to haunt you at upgrade time, or (worse yet) might be linked to some mysterious out-of-the-box automation that you don't know about because it is hidden in class-specific user properties.
    2) Be aware that X tables add a join to your queries, so if you are mapping one business component field to ATTRIB_01 and adding it to your list applets, you are potentially putting an unnecessary load on your database. X tables are best used for fields that are going to be displayed in only one or two places, so the join would not normally be included in your queries.
    3) Always use a prefix (usually X_ ) to denote extension columns when you do create them.
    4) Don't forget to map EIM extensions to the extension columns you create. You do not want to have to go through a schema change and release cycle just because the business wants you to import some data to your extension column.
    5) Consider whether you need a conversion to populate the new column in existing database records, especially if you are configuring a default value in your extension column.
    6) During upgrades, take the time to re-evalute your need for the extension column, taking into account the inevitable enhancements to the vanilla data model. For example, you may find, as we did, that the new version of the S_ADDR_ORG table had an ADDR_LINE_3 column, and our X_ADDR_ADDR3 column was no longer necessary. (Of course, re-configuring all your business components to use the new vanilla column can also be quite an ordeal.)
    Good luck!
    Jim

  • How to get the End date of the dynamic period in Financial Reports

    Dear All,
    I have a issue with the Financial Report, I want to show the text under the Heading in the Balance Sheet like 31 DEC 2008 but in this date should be the end date of the dynamic period what user select in the POV.
    Can any one have any idea about this.
    Regards
    rao.

    There are 2 options:
    1. Use the POVAlias text function:
    e.g. <<POVAlias ("Grid1", DimName)>>
    (you could also use POVMember if the items you want is the member and not the alias).
    2. Have a hidden column on the report referencing the POV selection, then reference this in the header.

  • CRM-ISU: Need to change the END date and Start Date for contract items

    Hi,
    There is an old contract item for which  I need to change the end date
    and there is a new contract item for which I need to change the start date.
    I need to change the contract item end date and start date using some function module in IS-U system (may be as RFC to CRM).Pleaselet me know if any body is ware of this functionality?
    I am aware of a FM EECRM_CONTRACT_DATE_CHANGE which may be used for changing End Date
    but how to change the start date of a new contract item?
    Please let me know if any body is aware of this?
    Thanks

    Hi,
    Hope you can solve it by this [Link1|Re: Function modules; [link2|CRM material;.
    Regards,
    Surjith

  • Employee works for 4 org units and want to distribute the cost to 4 cost ce

    Hi Experts,
    I am in the implementation phase, requirement gathering.
    I have scenerio where, Employee works for 4 org units and want to distribute the cost to 4 different cost centers.
    so that I can be able to find the exact cost occured for each Org unit.
    Please let me know how to map this in SAP?
    P oints will be rewarded fully
    Kindly dont post if you are not sure of your solution friends.
    Thanks
    Jay

    Hello,
    Infotype 0027 is the standard solution for multiple reporting / multi tasking in SAP.
    but also check which org unit he will be primarily assigned.
    Regards

  • Is there a way to show the end dates of the previous month stand out?

    is there a way to show the end dates of the previous month in bold or make it stand out? so 30,31 and 1st of this month don't all look the same? For example the 30,31st get a regular text since they are a part of the the last month and this month gets bold dates? Its hard to read the dates anyways.

    Pics and more
    I may receive some form of compensation, financial or otherwise, from my recommendation or link.
    5:05 PM Sunday; January 4, 2009

Maybe you are looking for