Extractor issue

Hi
Gurus
I am checking the values in the faglflext, when trading partner is posted with the journal entry, the posting period is 16 (where i am posting in this period , so i need the period to be 11 ). while i check the same entry in faglflexa the trading partner is posted with period 11. if then , when i am using fi_gl_10 as an extractor , i require faglflext table, to read all my balances which shows the period wrong.
Could someone clarify on this entry.
there are no special ledgers used.
thanks
bisembcs

Hi all
there is another problem associated with it.
For all the postings in faglflexa, for any period, for any account number there is a smilar postingin faglflext with one and only one period .
is this a config issue ?
thanks

Similar Messages

0FC_OP_01 extractor issues- DFFKKOPBW data not matching with

Hi All
We have an issue with the extractor 0FC_OP_01. Our business is comparing the values in
R/3 report u2013 G/L Account Balance Display (t-code S_ALR_87012277) with the
Open Items by GL Account report in BW .(actually these values in the BW report are coming from DFKKOPBW table in R/3) .
But since august, the R/3 G/L account balance report is not matching with the DFKKOPBW table balances. So bottom line the extractor 0FC_OP_01 is doing something wrong when populating the DFKKOPBW table which is causing these two reports to be out of balance
Did anybody face this kind of issue before? Please Advise.
FYI : We are following the same procedure to populate the DFKKOPBW table as in the below article.
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/a9996115-0b01-0010-b2b2-d9de0170a425;jsessionid=%28J2EE3417800%29ID0001499250DB01896329908162586522End
Thanks
KPK

In my case the Cube/PSA data itself is not matching with the R/3 report data.
Basically we run a job in R/3 in t-code FPBW with a Date id and Indentification. This job will pull the entries from base table DFKKOP into DFKKOPBW table .Then FRom this DFKKOPBW table data is loaded into PSA/Cube.
Here in my case the data in table DFKKOPBW itself is not matching with the R/3 report - G/L Account Balance Display (t-code S_ALR_87012277)) .
I am following the same procedure to run the JOb in T-code FPBW to populate the DFKKOPBW table as listed in the document at the above link. Moreover this difference in balances is occuring only starting from August ..Till July the balances in DFKKOPBW tally with the R/3report.
Please advise ..
Thanks
KPK

Document Date - Invoice Extractor Issue

Hi Folks,
I am facing an issue with Invoice extractor document date format while extracting data from source system.
The record fails at the SPM validation step.
Date in ECC and BKPF table 0949.08.10 (format: yyyy.mm.dd)
This data come to PSA but fails at the SPM validation step. Ideally if you look at the date it is in the valid format and should not fail.
The error message I get in SPM is: Field XSATRANDAT is of type DATS and contains unallowed values
Let me know how can we resolve this issue. We have 3 source system and to aggregate from all the systems we have approximately 5 such records creating problems.
Regards,
Sampat Desai

Hi Sampat,
Can you check to make sure under global settings the data format is setup correctly. Or you can also choose date format under the properties of each load.
Regards,
Rohit

CRM Extractor issue 0CRM_SRV_IBASE_ATTR

Hello,
This is a production issue.
CRM system has the installed bases created and extracted to BW and reporting is fine.
When there is a change to these installed bases such as
* serial number is changed AND/OR
* material number is changed
the delta still brings in the complete hierarchy 'After Image' only.
Meaning old material number and old serial number still remains in the BW cube and hence reporting is faulty.
Example.
In Ibase 30, Material 500085 with Qty 1, is overwritten/changed in CRM as Material 600088. (This is seen in Activity log in CRM correctly).
The extractor sends whole Ibase content as one row for Component header and one row for Material 600088 details(as seen in PSA).
However material 500085 row is still valid in BW as the validto is 12/31/9999.
So BW reports qty as 2 instead of 1.
I see the extractor delta process is AIM.
So this should have been an ongoing issue. However user complained only now.
How to solve this problem. Since this is a generic extractor others would also face this situation i would think.
Please advise.
Thanks

Hi Meenakshi,
As i understand you had two issues 1. with the new material 2.with qty.I hope the modified record is not coming to DSO.Some part of the code in the start routine is blocking the record.Please analyze the code in start routine.And check the change log table for this record for any clue how it is not being overwritten.
Regards,
Rambabu

Generic Extractor Issue

Hello Experts,
I have one small doubt on the Generic Extractor. My Generic Extractor is based on the Delta with the changed on Field(AEDAT) and I wanted to know is it possible to extract the data if changed on is not updated to the document but other fields are getting updated.
Like if the Sales Document status is changing from One status to other. In this case the AEDAT for that sales order wont get updated. in this case is it possible to extract that record as Delta thru the Generic Extractor if the Extractor is based on AEDAT.
Suggestions will be appreciated..
thanks
Bulli

Hello Bulli
Its very muc possible to define delta on 2 fields in generic data source , you need to use created on and changed on field to define delta by modifying standard extractor program
follo below threads
generic delta using function module with two fields AEDAT AND ERDAT
/people/siegfried.szameitat/blog/2005/09/29/generic-extraction-via-function-module
Thanks
Tripple k

Generic Fn Module Extractor Issue

Hi guys,
As i understand the function module extraction, when i use the open cursor and if i have to delete the datA in e_t_data, what kind of impact does it have in my data package as the size gets reduced by the above operation.
Thanks,
Your help is greatly appreciated.

The thing is i open the cursor with selection fields right, what if i have
to manipulate this data reduce it in the function module, the datapacket size gets reduced right. so what should i do to tackle this and also what should i do so if the data packet data from each packet is interrelated.
Thanks,
Your help is greatly appreciated

Full load Concept

Hi all,
Can somebody explain me why there are full loads that should not be deleted from the Infocube?
Theoratically, a full brings all data from the Source System, but we have fulls that only bring the data from a specific day and therefore we need to keep them on the cube/ods.
Example:
In our ODS we keep the full requests. If they are deleted the data can not be anymore reported.
Now we only have data starting from 23.05 and even that we load a full the data previously to this day is not being extracted.
The extractor is also not bringing the data of the past.
Is this a extarctor configuration or there´s some way to bring all data that is on the R/3 system?
Thanks,
Marta.

Hi Marta,
Yes you are very much correct. Full load pulls in all the data from the source system, but it pulls in the data for the restrictions mentioned in infopackage ..
Now say we are doing a full load to a cube and also to ODS. And say we dont have any selection restriction ..
As you know ODS has overwrite functionality .. while the cube does nt have it ..
Now say we do the full load continously .. Now the same records will b e pulled everytime .. And In ODS if we have set overwrite for data values in the update rule, It will overwrite only, and we will get the latest data only .. But in case of cube all these key figure will keep getting added up as the same data is being loaded multiple times ..
Hence in this case we delete the earlier requests for a cube .. Now say we do full load with some selection restrictios(say, quarter wise, month wise) .. In this case we dont delete the earlier requests if the selection restrictions are mutually exclusive ..
And for the extractor issue, could you please elaborate on that?
Hope it helps ..

DBACOCKPIT for SQL DB

Hi !
We're running the Managed System Config for a Java NW 7.4 SP 7 system on Solman 7.1 SP12.
In the DB extractor step, I see the below error as a result of which DBACOCKPIT Monitoring also stops working.
(The Monitoring from DBACOCKPIT works when we enter the parameters in Step 4 & select create DB connection...but after a few minutes, due to this extractor issue it probably stops)...
Both Solman & the satellite system have their DB'S under one named SQL 2012 instance.
I've tried to run the scripts manually from DBACOCKPIT, but it gives me the below error:
The DBACOCKPIT connection still works...its only the Monitoring part that's affected.....
Please help advise....
Thanks a lot !
saba.

Hi Guys,
Thanks a lot for the help
I'm a little finicky about implementing Note 1963503, since DBACOCKPIT monitoring for other connected systems works well from Solman.
The only difference is this is a Java stack.
I've entered the below details in MSC:
Where Monitor login name is: SID_SAPMonitor.......
Am I doing something wrong ?
Thanks !
saba.

CRM TERRITORY_GUID extraction to BW using 0CRM_OPPT_H/0CRM_LEAD_H

Hello,
I am using the standard extractor for Opportunity and Lead header data extraction to BW. Being TERR_GUID is a standard field on both the extractor, I always overlooked this field. But recently I saw that this field is not getting populated consistently during extraction.
I did RSA3 test in CRM system, and for some transactions, TERR_GUID is populated and for some it is not. In all cases TERRITORY is maintained while creating the transaction in CRM system. Seems strange, but this is what is happening. So just trying to understand what could be the reason. Does not seems to be extractor issue, may be some issue with Territory maintainance in CRM..not sure though.
Also I found a SAP NOTE# 1017643 for similar issue, however it is not valid for our release.
Anyone faced such problem in past. Please advice.
Regards
Pankaj

One more thing I am observing is that.... when I use one perticular Business Partner (say 'ABC'), RSA3 extract the TERR_GUID value. But when I use business Partner 'XYZ', TERR_GUID is not extracted. Is there link between BP and TERR which is not maintained correctly?

FI-SL Special Ledger Extractor (Delta not working) Issues

Hi,
We are creating extractor for Special Purpose Ledger using standard SAP methodology.
Step1: Goto Transaction BW01 --> select the Summary table ---> Check for total records and line Items and then execute. This results in extrators created for totals and Line Items.
Issue 1: The Summary table eg. ZLTST has special ledgers Z1, Z2 and ZA where Z1 and Z2 are for spot balances and ZA is for Average Balances, the issue is we dont see any extractor for ZA (we do see extractors created for Z1 and Z2 both totals and line Items)
Step 2: Goto transaction BW03 ---> select the totals extractor and double click
Issue 2: When you double click the check box to Activate Delta Update for Z1 and Z2 (totals) is disabled???
If anyone has configured Special Ledger Extractors in past for release 4.7 and higher please let me know the process to set up delta

Hi Gilles,
As you are a FI-SL consultant, can you provide me peformance issues on FI-SL?
I posted a thread on New G/L and FI-SL performance
My apologizes to post that question on this thread.
Thank you
Bernard

Data syncup issue - Custom extractor for revenue recognition data from ECC into BW

Hi there,
We have created a custom extractor on top of a Function Module (FM) in ECC that reads data primarily from VBREVE table. Currently, we have close to 10 million records and full load isn't a preferred option so we built in a delta mechanism using "Created On" (ERDAT) and "Posting Date" (BUDAT). The idea is to do an initial full load and then switch over to delta loads on a nightly basis for data where:
"Created On" OR "Posting Date" is within last 6 months.
This will ensure if any updates are made to the existing VBREVE entries, this change will be reflected in the BW DSO, provided the "Created On" or "Posting Date" fall within last 6 months. The issue comes up if in ECC a billing plan is cut down to a smaller term, let's say from 3 years to 2 years, the entries for the 1 year will be deleted from VBREVE table. How can I pick up this change in BW DSO since this data has already been loaded in the past? Addition of entries are okay but I need to address the deletion on entries in VBREVE table so that it reflects this in BW DSO. Any ideas how I can accomplish this? In the example on the screenshots, BW still shows the before image and I need to be able to get it to sync up with ECC as per the after image.
-Rohit

Dear Rohit,
The case is complicated , there can be workaround using the changedon date from VBAK table. if the billing plan is changed in the sales order VBAK will be updated for changedon.
1) If the billing plan deletion is a very specific case, then using the change log tables find out which are the sales order for which there has been billing plan change. Store this sales order details in DSO day wise. call it DSO1
2) Create a self transformation to the DSO ( DSO2) where you are currently loading from the table VBREVE (DSO2 to DSO2 -For loading data from the same DSO) .Transformation should have reverse record mode given as a constant.
3) load the data DSO2 from DSO2 by filling up sales order details from DSO1 in the DTP filter.
( This will reverse the complete entry for the sales order in DSO2 for the sales order for which billing plan has been changed)
4) Now load afresh for these sales order again from source system to DSO2 from the table VBREVE.
You can also use VBAK changedon date to trigger this load.
Hope I have not confused you
Regards
Gajesh

Extractor for goods issue

Can anyone send me the name of the extractor for goods issue? Does it comes under SD? or MM fullfillment?
Thanjs
Raj

Hi RajMani,
What exactly is your requirement?
Check with your business or functional team for the source tables from where they want the report to be built.
based on the source tables we can suggest you the exact data source you need for your requirement.
Regards
KP

Issues with a customized extractor running 'Full' loads.

Hi Gurus,
Is it possible to check at what date/time a particular data record has been posted in the VBPA table [Sales Document Partner Function Table]?
My issue is that we have a customized extractor that pulls data from both the VBAP & VBPA tables based on VBELN [Doc No] & POSNR [Item]. We are using an 'Inner Join' on these two tables, so if either the Doc No or Item is not present in the VBPA table at the time of extraction, the data record will be skipped and we are facing several such missing documents in BW.
The loads are 'Full' based on 'ERDAT' & 'AEDAT' on the VBAP table for the last 3 days i.e. if a Sales Document is either Created or Changed in the last 3 days, it will be picked up by the extractor. So my reasoning for the missing data records in BW is that the VBPA table entries for that particular Order had been updated at a later date and hence data was missed out during extraction [because of the 'Inner Join' based on Doc No & Item].
But since VBPA does not have a created on or changed on field, I am unable to find out when exactly a data record has been updated in the VBPA table.
Any suggestions that you can provide will be highly appreciated!
Thanks

Hi,
I feel your table join logic is not correct. Please discuss with your functional team once and try to revise the logic. Otherwise you may keep missing some records all the time. Test the extractor alot in RSA3 before replicating in BW.
Regards,
Suman

Issue with the SNP Extractor in APO-BI.

Hi Experts,
I am facing an issue with SNP Extractor. I have a SNP Extractor in APO system, and it has 4 datasources connected to it.Out of the 4 datasources, we are getting display of records for relevant selections in only one data source, but for the other three data sources, given what ever be the selections, it gives a message saying " 0 records available ".
Please could you suggest, what can be the issue and also indicate a solution to resolve it. Do we need to apply any SAP Note to resolve the issue?? And where can we see the Current Support Package that is installed in the system??
Replies in this regard, would be very helpful.
Thanks and Regards,
Bhargava

Hi,
you can see the Current Support Package in this way:
Log on in your BW system --> System --> Status --> Component Information (hand lens) -->
near the SAP_BW software component and release, there is the level (for example 0006).

Sequence issue for Extractor

Hi All,
We are facing problems with the delta record sequence in some of our extractors(QM, SD). How do we fix this issue.
we are of 2004.1 Patch 5, Update Mode - Queued Delta.
Thanks
Niveda

Hi Niveda,
Please clerify (and check) that where is this sequence problem, at R3 side or in BW.
In BW if you are using any datamart then chk at data target also. In ODS check via keys, how data is coming.
My suggestion would be:
1. if you are sure at R3 side then go for writing a start routine and try to sequence records while extracting them.
Like say there are 3 records. Record 1, Record 2, Record 3 and thery are in different requests then you should have these requests in sequence, meaning req 1 for rec 1 and so on.
2. Look for OSS note, may be patch upgrade needed (I am not sure of this but you can write to SAP for this also) .
3. Check RODELTAM for different delta types and their working, in contrast to your source.
4. Also check your update rules, is there any additional setting?
Hope this helps.

Extractor issue

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for