F110 : How to group payments by assignement field (ZUONR)

Hi,
I have created a Grouping key '02' and I assigned this grouping key to a vendor for which I will run a payment program.
In customizing I assigned field1 ZUONR (Assignement) to my Grouping key '02'
I run Tcode F110 to pay 3 invoices :
Invoice 1 : Assignement = Investment
Invoice 2 : Assignement = Exploitation
Invoice 3 : Assignement = Exploitation
When I run a payment program (F110) the system create one Payment document and one Check for the 3 invoices !
However, for my case I want to create 2 payment documents and 2 Checks, one for invoice 1, an other for invoice 2 and invoice 3
Please Have I forget a Customizing point ? how to do to have 2 payment documents in my case ?
Regards.

see this in OSS note 305414 - F110: Unintelligible grouping of documents:
2. A grouping key is stored in the master record of the vendor/customer.The fields according to which the payment program groups the documents are defined per grouping key in Customizing (Transaction OBAP).
If this grouping key does not work the way you expect it to, check whether report RSZGR000 contains the respective source code (the keys defined in Transaction OBAP have to exist in the CASE statement for G01-ZGRUP). If this not the case, you have to generate the report. You can do this by changing one of the entries in the transaction and subsequently saving it.

Similar Messages

Assignment field (ZUONR) in partial payment customer

Hello,
We have an issue concerning the assignment field in the partial payment from a customer.
In the assignment field (ZUONR) we normally have the invoice numbers from another application (via interface to SAP).
When we receive a partial payment from a customer via bank statement (MT940 EBS file), we get a payment advice in FEBAN. on the correct invoice. It is not booked because the difference is too large. That is correct!
Our debtor department delete the payment advice and the use post item (in FEBAN) to create a partial payment (via FB05).
Instead of the assignment from the invoice document, SAP puts another number in ZUONR for the first posting area. Afetr investigation it seems like it is a part of the payment advice number!?
When we manually create a partial payment (without first having a payment advice from EBS), we get the (actual) date in ZUONR.
In the screenprints attached, it is shown.
In the attachment BSEG part 1 and BSEG part 2, the assigment fields with their values are visible as result of FB05 from post item in FEBAN.
For those items there was a payment advice, which is deleted (first). Assignment (ZUONR) is a "strange" value, part of payment advice number!?
BSEG part 3 and BSEG part 4, the items are shown when partial payment is manually entered (via FB05) without payment advice via EBS in FEBAN. Then a date is filled in assignment (ZUONR) field.
Is it possible to arrange that the assignment field (ZUONR) gets the value of the original invoice, on which the partial payment is created?
Is that possible with customizing?

Hi,
The ZUONR is filled by the Sort key in the account's master data. This sort key is defined in the OB16.
And check the path below: Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable --> Customer Accounts --> Line Items --> Display Line Items --> Display Line Items without ALV.
JPA

Updating the Assignment Field (ZUONR) with Check No

Hi
Can anyone help me please?
I would like to update the assignment field (ZUONR) in the Bank Payables Clearing Account with the cheque number from the payment run (PAYR-CHECF).
1. Firstly is this possible?; and
2. If so could you explain how I do this.
Thanks in advance for your assistance on this issue.
Regards
Claire

Hi
I would but there is no sort key which contains this, nor can I create one :o(.
If you are aware of how I can do this then please let me know. Is there a user exit which will populate this field when a payment has been made?
Regards
Claire

Assignment field(ZUONR) data at clearing

Hello Experts,
I have a question on the assignment field(ZUONR) when I do the clearing for 2 open items.
I have 2 open items for a certain customer, one is an account receivables and another a down payment for customer.
And above 2 open items have a certain data at each assignment field(ZUONR) to identify each open item.
I'd like to clear above 2 items, so I go into the transaction FB05, select 2 items and simulate that document.
At that time, when I look into each line item, there is no data at each assignment field even though the original document has a certain data at each assignment field.
Namely, each assignment field is all blank.
I wish the clearing document has the data at each assignment field that the original document has.
Is there anyone who can solve this issue?
Thanks.
BR,
Chris

Hi,
In order to populate same assignment field (ZUONR) in both the documents Sort Key should be same in the G/L master.
You can try following Sort keys
1. 031 Customer number
2. 024 Document header text
Else you can create your own sort key through transaction code OB16.
In this give
1. Sort key in Enter Sort key
2. Enter Description - In this enter description of Sort Key.
3. Enter Field1 - In this enter field name.
Hope your issue is resolved else revert.
Regards,
Tejas

To change assignment field (ZUONR) in accounting document when doing PGI

Hi Gurus,
I have one requirement. I will create one sales order with the reference of contract and then i will do the delivery and I will do PostGoodsIssue(PGI).In standard at that time it creates an accounting document in background.At that time I need to change that assignment field (ZUONR) value to contract number in that Accounting document.
I treid with BAPI and Business Transaction Events like (1130,1120,1025) but it is not working.
So please help me in this issue.
Thansks & Regards,
R.P.Sastry.

The substitution logics run before delivery number generated, so how can we achieve this?
No, it doesn't. The substitution is triggered at the time the accounting document is created during PGI which is WAY after the delivery is created.
The substitution suggestion is valid. If you can't use a direct substitution, then use a substitution exit. BTE's will work as well.

Payment Advice Assignment Field

Hello Experts,
My client wants to update BSEG-ZUONR field when user updates the Assignment field of the payment Advice (AVIP-ZUONR).
Is there any configuration that should be done to update BSEG-ZUNOR when we update the AVIP-ZUONR? Please shed some light on this.
Thanks In Advance

HI Venkat,
ineed your advice in payment advice in app we asign setup paying company code for payment transaction ofter in this payment advice and check we give any link.
Please give me answer!
Thank you!
Regards,
Pradheep.

To change assignment field (ZUONR) in accounting document

Hi Gurus,
I have a requirement to change the value of the field (ZUONR) with delivery number for particular g/l account in the accounting document when i will go to accounting information from vf03.
Please help me in this regard.
Thanks & Regards,
R.P.Sastry

Another solutions,
You can use 1120 BTE.
For example,
You can copy from SAMPLE_PROCESS_00001120 to ZFI_EVENT_00001120 and you must some customizing on transaction FIBF for activation.
Then you write some codes for updating ZUONR.
LOOP AT t_bkpf.
    IF t_bkpf-blart = 'SA'.
      LOOP AT t_bsegsub.
        t_bsegsub-zuonr = ''.
        MODIFY t_bsegsub.
      ENDLOOP.
    ENDIF.
ENDLOOP.
Regards,
Burak

F110 - How to group two payments for a single costumer

Hello experts,
I'm having an issue here. The user has 14 invoices, 11 of them are DR document type, 3 are DM doc. type. All of the 14 invoices have payment method 4. When we create the proposal for this costumer, two payments are created, one for all the DR invoices, and another one for the DM invoices.
What the business want is to be able to create only one payment, including both DM and DR invoices. I tried looking into FBZP for payment method "4", both in company code and country. I flagged "Single payment for marked item" and nothing changed, 2 different payments are still created for the same customer.
Also I looked into the customer master data, on the "Payment Transaction" tab, flagged the "Single payment" but it works exactly the other way, one payment document per invoice, which I do not need. I saw something about Grouping keys, created one with GL Account, Customer and Posting key but did not work, still two payments for the same document.
Is there anything else that I can try? Any help will be appreciated. Please let me know if something is unclear.
Best regards and thanks in advance,
Ivan

Hello DSK,
First of all thanks for the reply. I tried with the grouping key in the customer master data, I created one grouping key "02" and assigned it the customer but it did not work.
The grouping key is composed by:
KUNNR
BSCHL
HKONT
Which I think are common values between the DM docs and the DR doc.s
Regards,
Ivan

F110 - how to spread payment as % to different banks ?

Hello,
We set up vendor payments by transfer.
All payments to a provider must be a single transfer.
We want to spread the various transfers between several banks.
For the transaction F110, is it possible to set an allocation of the total payment as a percentage (%) between different banks?
Regards.

I should not mention house bank in the vendor accounts because if one day you have no available amount in one house bank the vendors linked to this bank will not be paid from another house bank.
I prefer using optimization by bank group: in the bank data (BNKA), you enter a bank group for each bank and the payment program will choose for each vendor an house bank belonging to the same bank group, if possible. But the payment program will also try using another house bank if there is no available amount in the banks of the same bank group.
see also:
[http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/01/a9bf34455711d182b40000e829fbfe/content.htm]

How to group data and assign cell names using Excel templates

Hi all,
reading the article "Real Excel Templates 1.5" on the Tim Dexter's Blog, I found that I need hierarchical data for Excel templates. So only in this way I can group my data.
My hierarchy is composed by 3 levels:
lev 1 DESTINATION: is the higher level that groups SERVICES and COUNTRY
lev 2 SERVICES: is the level that groups the countries
lev 3 COUNTRY: is the lowest level with the COUNTRY, CALLS and CALLS_MINUTES details
An example of my hierarchy is this:
lev 1 INTERNATIONAL
lev 2 INTERNATIONAL FIXED
lev 3 Albania 90 438,15
lev 3 Armenia 1 16,95
lev 2 INTERNATIONAL MOBILE
lev 3 Albania Mobile 161 603,35
lev 3 Australia Mobile 6 34,38
lev 1 NATIONAL
lev 2 HELLAS LOCAL
lev 3 Hellas Local 186,369 707940,6
lev 2 HELLAS MOBILE
lev 3 Hellas Mobile Cosmote 31,33 43856,97
lev 3 Hellas Mobile Q-Telecom 2,398 4343,78
lev 2 HELLAS NATIONAL
lev 3 Hellas Long Distance 649 1499,55
lev 1 INTERNET
lev 2 INTERNET CALLS
lev 3 Cosmoline @Free 79 2871,3
So, my data template is the following (with exactly the hierarchy I want for my data):
<dataTemplate name="emp" description="destinations" dataSourceRef="GINO_DB">
     <dataQuery>
          <sqlStatement name="Q1">
               <![CDATA[SELECT 1 TOTAL_CALLS, 2 TOTAL_CALLS_MIN from dual ]]>
          </sqlStatement>
          <sqlStatement name="Q2">
               <![CDATA[SELECT dest.ID_DESTINATION, dest.DESC_DEST from ale.AAA_DESTINATION dest order by dest.ID_DESTINATION ]]>
          </sqlStatement>
          <sqlStatement name="Q3">
               <![CDATA[SELECT ser.ID_SERVICE,
ser.ID_DEST,
ser.DESC_SERVICE,
count.ID_COUNTRY,
count.ID_SERV,
count.COUNTRY,
count.CALLS,
count.CALLS_MIN
from ale.AAA_SERVICE ser, ale.AAA_COUNTRY count
where ser.ID_SERVICE= count.ID_SERV
and ID_DEST = :ID_DESTINATION
order by ser.ID_SERVICE ]]>
          </sqlStatement>
     </dataQuery>
     <dataStructure>
          <group name="G_TOT" source="Q1">
               <element name="TOTAL_CALLS" value="G_COUNTRY.CALLS" function="SUM()"/>
               <element name="TOTAL_CALLS_MIN" value="G_COUNTRY.CALLS_MIN" function="SUM()"/>
               <group name="G_DEST" source="Q2">
                    <element name="DESC_DEST" value="DESC_DEST"/>
                    <element name="DEST_CALLS_SUBTOTAL" value="G_COUNTRY.CALLS" function="SUM()"/>
                    <element name="DEST_CALLS_MIN_SUBTOTAL" value="G_COUNTRY.CALLS_MIN" function="SUM()"/>
                    <group name="G_SERV" source="Q3">
                         <element name="DESC_SERVICE" value="DESC_SERVICE"/>
                         <element name="SERV_CALLS_SUBTOTAL" value="G_COUNTRY.CALLS" function="SUM()"/>
                         <element name="SERV_CALLS_MIN_SUBTOTAL" value="G_COUNTRY.CALLS_MIN" function="SUM()"/>
                         <group name="G_COUNTRY" source="Q3">
                              <element name="COUNTRY" value="COUNTRY"/>
                              <element name="CALLS" value="CALLS"/>
                              <element name="CALLS_MIN" value="CALLS_MIN"/>
                         </group>
                    </group>
               </group>
          </group>
     </dataStructure>
</dataTemplate>
Not considering the CALLS and CALLS_MIN details (I focused only on the COUNTRY which is as the same level), with this data template, making tests on my excel template, I noticed that I can group ONLY two nested levels using the format XDO_GROUP_?group_name?
XDO_GROUP_?G_DEST?
XDO_GROUP_?G_SERV?
or
XDO_GROUP_?G_DEST?
XDO_GROUP_?G_COUNTRY?
or
XDO_GROUP_?G_SERV?
XDO_GROUP_?G_COUNTRY
If I try to group all the three level together in this order
XDO_GROUP_?G_DEST?
XDO_GROUP_?G_SERV?
XDO_GROUP_?G_COUNTRY
I don't have the output I would like to have.....
Practically, in my excel I have 3 rows with the following labels
DESTINATION (called XDO_?DESC_DEST? - =Sheet1!$A$3
SERVICE (called XDO_?DESC_SERVICE? - =Sheet1!$A$4
COUNTRY (called XDO_?COUNTRY? - =Sheet1!$A$5)
where
XDO_GROUP_?G_DEST? (=Sheet1!$A$3:$B$5)
XDO_GROUP_?G_SERV? (=Sheet1!$A$4:$B$5)
XDO_GROUP_?G_COUNTRY     (=Sheet1!$A$5:$B$5)
I noticed that if I don't use the last one (XDO_GROUP_?G_COUNTRY), my output is correct even if I don't have more than one country for each service....As soon as I put XDO_GROUP_?G_COUNTRY....I loose all the 2nd level and the most of times the 3rd level too....
So...I think that the problem is how I choose the excel cells when I assign the XDO_GROUP_?group_name?
Anybody had made some tests, or can help me ???? I'm becoming crazy.....
Any help will be appreciated
Thanks in advance
Alex

But how can I use tags XDO_GROUP_?? to group data correctly using hierarchial xml, I don't want to use flat XML.
Yep, I using Template Builder in Excel to run reports localy, and output is wrong
It's seems that groups couldn't define the level of nesting, I think...
How can I write it in XDO_METADATA sheet?
Though I have hierarchial XML and groups should define nesting level correctly.
I have no clue.....

F110 - How to change Payment Form to send to bank

Hi friends,
I am testing F110 and my target is to generate a file in the end of the process payment (F110) in the format/layout required by the bank and send it to the bank. Where can I change or define the file layoutto suit t to the bank layout?
Thank you,
Jean

Hi Praisty,
This is why we are going to execute payments trough a new bank and they need to receive payment information in a specific layout (their layout). We are going to make credit current account, for example.
I configurated some bank information in FBZP, but now I need generate payment information in the layout informed in the layout that bank.
There is already a configuration for that which was done to work witth another bank so I think I just need to know were it is and done and copy it it and adjust it to that new layout. (in the future will work with both banks).. I am not sure.
Thank you,
Jean

Display Assignment Field for Mulitple Account Assignment Screen in MIRO

Hi Members,
I'm hoping someone may have the answer to a question concerning the transaction MIRO-posting an invoice.
The issue occurs in MIRO on the Purchase Order tab. I have a validation rule which requires a value in the assignment field before the document can be posted. When multiple account assignment functionality is used to allocate the charges, there is no assignment field available. How can I configure the assignment field (ZUONR) to be present in this area?
Your responses are appreciated.
KF

Thank you for your response.
What is call point 2? Would this specify that the substitution rule would only apply to the multiple account assignment screen?
If that is the case, this might provide one option.
However, if it applies to the entire MIRO transaction, that will not be possible because we use the text field and the assignment field for other purposes in the transaction.
Do we have any other options?
KF

F4 help for assignment field in F-02

Requirement is to attach a drop down help to assignment field (ZUONR) in F-02. This F4 should be visible only when special G/L indicator filed is ticked.
How this can be done any BADI or screen -exit for this.
Thanks
Pt

Doesn't look like this would work without a modification.

Assignment Field is blank in the Accounting Document of MIRO

Hi Gurus
I am working on ECC 6 version. I have observed in my system that for some of the vendor invoices posted using the MIRO transaction, assignment field is blank in the respective Accounting Document for the Vendor Line Item. But for GRIR Line Item Assignment field is filled with Purchase Order Number.
My requirement is to display the Purchase Order Number in the Assignment Field (ZUONR) of the Vendor line item also and for that purpose I have assigned the Sort Key of Purchase Order in the Recon GL Account master under Control Data Tab, Sort Key Field as 010(Purchase Order No.). Also, the Vendor Master has the Sort Key as 010 (Purchase Order).
I have applied the Note 676338 and checked and checked the structure RFPOSXEXT. It has the Assignment fields both ZUONR as well as U_ZUONR.
Still after above changes, when I post the MIRO, the assignment field in the vendor line item of its accounting document is blank. Any clues how to fill the vendor line item's assignment filed with the purchase order number ?
Thanks for your help.
Regards
Gemini

Hi Gemini,
Sort key does no magic, it populates value from the original field from the same line item only.
Taking this as an example...First check that PO field is populated in the Vendor Line item then only sort key will be able to populate the field else it will be blank.
I don't think system populated PO field in the vendor line item.
If you want to meet your requirement and contact your ABAPer and write a Substitution User-exit to populate PO Number into assignment field.
Regards,
Chintan Joshi

Assignment field in Process Receivables page of collection work list.

Hi Experts,
I have a requirement where I need to show the customer invoice assignment field (ZUONR) in the Process Receivables table in the collection management worklist. Below is the screenshot for more understanding on my requirement. I need to know how can I pull this field from AR to FSCM?
I can pull the data from BSEG table and create an user exit for modifying the structure of the Process Receivables table to include the assignment field.
I am looking for alternative better solution. Any inputs on this will be very helpful.
Regards
Pankaj Pareek

Hi Pankaj.
BAdI UDM_WL_ITEM_CREATE, UDM_WL_ITEM_DISP is very good point to control worlist items but you have to do enhancement to add fields AR list in Process receivables.
1. Append structure into structure FDM_COLL_INVOICE
2. Add Enhancement at the end of functions FDM_COLL_INVOICES_READ & FDM_COLL_INVOICES_READ_CLOSED
You can get more detail of implementation in blog posting named 'Adding fields in the Item level / Invoice level of the Collection management work list' in this area.

F110 : How to group payments by assignement field (ZUONR)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for